GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Video Games And ConsolesTop 10 Best Entertainment App Development Services of 2026
Ranked top 10 entertainment app development services with picks like ArcTouch, Chetu, Algoworks, plus Scopely, Zynga, Epic Games for selection.
How we ranked these tools
Gitnux editors write the brief first: the topic, the inclusion rules, and the frame for what belongs.
Agents extract product evidence with provenance, then collect written reviews and transcribe video reviews and podcasts.
Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
ArcTouch is the safest bet for studios coordinating entertainment, streaming, and loyalty app delivery with backend integration, whereas Chetu is a strong fit for teams that need deeper custom ownership of media app integrations for repeatable releases.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
ArcTouch
API-driven release automation that keeps playback, entitlement checks, and analytics event schemas aligned across environments.
Best for: Fits when studios need coordinated entertainment client delivery and backend integration for ongoing titles.
Chetu
Editor pickClient-backend integration planning that ties API contracts to entertainment workflows and rollout sequencing.
Best for: Fits when teams need custom entertainment app integration and client-backend ownership for repeatable releases.
Algoworks
Editor pickPlayer analytics instrumentation tied to watch history and engagement events across client releases.
Best for: Fits when entertainment teams need integrated app delivery with player telemetry and media pipeline wiring.
Comparison Table
ArcTouch
agencyApp development studio building entertainment, streaming, and loyalty apps for consumer brands.
API-driven release automation that keeps playback, entitlement checks, and analytics event schemas aligned across environments.
ArcTouch production work centers on shipping entertainment clients that handle playback UX, user identity touchpoints, and feature wiring for notifications and account flows. The development approach is geared toward integration depth because client events must align with studio backend logic for entitlement, watch history, and playback telemetry. Admin and governance practices tend to show up through controlled release cycles and environment separation for staging and production deployments.
A tradeoff shows up when teams need a large breadth of third-party integrations without investing in implementation mapping and QA test coverage. ArcTouch fits best when a studio has a defined content model and wants API-based automation for repeatable releases across multiple titles and platforms. It is less aligned for teams that require a fully turnkey catalog pipeline with minimal coordination on their side.
- +Client and backend integration work supports consistent entitlement and playback behavior
- +Event instrumentation wiring supports playback analytics and watch history capture
- +API-first automation reduces manual steps across environment releases
- +TV and mobile client delivery fits studios with multi-screen entertainment roadmaps
- –Works best with clear studio content and entitlement contracts
- –Third-party integration breadth can require extra implementation mapping
- –QA effort rises when titles span many devices and codec variations
Streaming product teams
Ship new watch experiences
Consistent launch across titles
Entertainment studio engineering
Integrate playback telemetry
Accurate watch history capture
Show 2 more scenarios
Live content operations
Run controlled release cycles
Fewer release regressions
Environment separation and automated deployment steps reduce drift between staging and production during live updates.
Smart TV platform teams
Deliver TV app functionality
Faster TV feature rollouts
ArcTouch produces TV client UX and feature wiring that supports multi-screen playback and engagement flows.
Best for: Fits when studios need coordinated entertainment client delivery and backend integration for ongoing titles.
Chetu
enterprise_vendorCustom software development provider offering entertainment and media app solutions.
Client-backend integration planning that ties API contracts to entertainment workflows and rollout sequencing.
Chetu fits when entertainment teams need production-grade client and server integration, including app-side state management and backend coordination. Delivery commonly includes media playback feature wiring, user lifecycle handling, and external service connections like analytics ingestion and identity providers. API surface depth is a recurring strength, because Chetu work typically maps endpoints to specific app workflows and rollout steps rather than treating integration as a single handoff.
A key tradeoff is that Chetu delivery tends to move fastest when requirements are concrete for player behavior, entitlements, and edge cases, because late shifts increase rework across client and backend code. A common usage situation is replacing a fragmented entertainment app stack with a unified client-backend integration plan that reduces runtime issues and aligns release governance.
- +API-driven implementation work that maps endpoints to specific app workflows
- +Engineering support for multi-platform entertainment clients, including TV surfaces
- +Backend integration focus that reduces handoff gaps across releases
- +Operational tooling work for admin-driven content and entitlement changes
- –Delivery speed drops when player, entitlement, or catalog requirements shift late
- –Deep customization can increase coordination needs across multiple stakeholders
- –Complex entertainment edge cases may require incremental sprints, not a single phase
- –Governance and release controls depend on how clearly workflows are specified
Entertainment product teams
Build app flows tied to entitlements
Fewer access mismatches during playback
OTT streaming engineering
Replace fragmented client integration
More predictable release outcomes
Show 2 more scenarios
Data and analytics teams
Instrument watch and playback events
Cleaner event feeds for reporting
Connects playback and session events to analytics pipelines with stable API contracts.
Content operations teams
Admin workflows for content changes
Faster operational content rollouts
Implements admin-driven updates that keep catalog availability aligned with app behavior.
Best for: Fits when teams need custom entertainment app integration and client-backend ownership for repeatable releases.
Algoworks
agencySoftware development company providing entertainment and media app solutions.
Player analytics instrumentation tied to watch history and engagement events across client releases.
Algoworks is positioned to build entertainment apps that rely on live streaming or video-on-demand playback, and it emphasizes media workflow integration rather than front-end delivery alone. Its service focus typically includes adaptive bitrate streaming support paths, media transcoding integration, and playback analytics event wiring for watch history and engagement views. Engagement fit is strongest when product teams need consistent feature behavior across mobile apps and OTT-style clients.
A tradeoff appears when a project demands deep custom console tooling or bespoke DRM client certification processes that are not already part of the delivery plan. Algoworks works well when the media stack is defined upfront enough to map endpoints, entitlement checks, and playback telemetry into implementable app modules. The most efficient usage situation is a studio consolidating app delivery with media pipeline integration so that player behavior and analytics remain consistent across releases.
- +Media workflow integration across playback, telemetry, and UI modules
- +Build delivery across mobile and OTT-style client surfaces
- +Implementation of codec and subtitle rendering paths in player UI
- +Configuration-driven feature rollout across app builds
- –Requires clear media stack ownership to avoid end-to-end scope drift
- –Advanced DRM and certification workflows can add scheduling overhead
- –Complex entitlement edge cases may need extra discovery iterations
- –External content licensing constraints may limit release timelines
OTT product teams
Launch VOD app with analytics
Faster iteration on retention signals
Live streaming studios
Ship low-latency live viewing app
More reliable live session tracking
Show 1 more scenario
Subscription platforms
Implement entitlement-aware playback
Fewer playback access failures
Wires entitlement checks into app flows and conditions stream availability.
Best for: Fits when entertainment teams need integrated app delivery with player telemetry and media pipeline wiring.
Cubix
agencyMobile app development agency delivering entertainment, gaming, and social apps for iOS and Android.
Player and content workflow alignment that reduces rework between playback UX and publishing constraints.
Cubix delivers entertainment app development work with a focus on media-first product engineering and end-to-end release support. The most distinct angle is tighter integration between player experiences, content delivery workflows, and platform operational tasks required to ship streaming and interactive entertainment apps.
- +Media-first delivery that keeps player UX aligned with production workflows
- +Practical focus on release readiness for app-store and content publishing constraints
- +Instrumentation support for playback analytics and watch-history style signals
- +Extensibility for interactive entertainment features beyond basic playback
- –Heavier operational involvement is needed for DRM and rights workflows
- –Governance controls for large multi-team orgs are not its strongest documented area
- –API and automation surface breadth is unclear for deep third-party orchestration
- –Complex OTT entitlement designs may require additional discovery and iteration
Best for: Fits when an entertainment team needs media app engineering tied to release operations.
Blue Label Labs
agencyApp design and development agency serving media, entertainment, and gaming clients.
Media-ready app delivery that coordinates player behavior, device constraints, and release readiness across app surfaces.
Blue Label Labs builds entertainment-focused apps with an emphasis on media workflows and production-grade integrations. It supports end-to-end app engineering for live and on-demand experiences, including streaming playback logic and player-adjacent features.
- +Entertainment app engineering aligned to media product delivery cycles
- +Practical integration work around playback, device behavior, and release constraints
- +Clear handoff structure between engineering, QA, and launch readiness
- +Automation-friendly delivery artifacts for multi-surface entertainment apps
- –Playback-adjacent integrations can require detailed input from the product team
- –Extensibility depends on how early media services and SDK boundaries are defined
- –Governance artifacts like audit logs are not guaranteed as a default layer
- –Complex entitlement and rights flows may need additional orchestration work
Best for: Fits when an entertainment team needs full app engineering plus media workflow integration.
Hyperlink InfoSystem
agencyApp development company offering entertainment, gaming, and social app services.
End-to-end entertainment feature implementation that ties playback UX to backend entitlements, watch analytics, and content operations.
Hyperlink InfoSystem supports entertainment app development with an emphasis on media-focused engineering and cross-device delivery. The service is geared toward building features around playback experience, user engagement, and commerce workflows used in OTT and gaming-adjacent entertainment apps.
- +Media-feature delivery experience for entertainment app feature sets
- +Cross-device development support for mobile and connected viewing contexts
- +Backend integration focus for entitlements, analytics capture, and content workflows
- +Project execution geared toward shipping production-ready app updates
- –Documentation depth on streaming formats and DRM workflows is not consistently evident
- –Automation coverage across release pipelines can require extra internal discipline
- –Admin tooling for complex catalog operations may need heavier client-side process
- –API surface details for third-party player integrations can be thin
Best for: Fits when a team needs mobile-first entertainment delivery with backend integration and ongoing feature iterations.
Mindinventory
agencyMobile app development agency providing entertainment and media app services.
Live-ops delivery workflow that supports iterative content and feature shipping across entertainment app releases.
Mindinventory focuses on production-grade mobile and web game development and live-ops delivery, which fits entertainment teams with ongoing content drops and feature iterations. It is distinct for delivery workflows oriented around shipping playable experiences, not just UI or analytics integration.
- +Entertainment-focused engineering for gameplay, UIs, and continuous feature releases
- +Live-ops oriented delivery that supports recurring content and iteration cycles
- +Cross-platform development coverage for common mobile and web entertainment targets
- +Experience handling back-end support needs that typically accompany app releases
- –Limited evidence of turnkey OTT workflows like DRM and packaging
- –Integration depth for streaming pipelines may require specialist coordination
- –Governance and audit logging controls are not a primary documented differentiator
- –Automation surface for large-scale deployment orchestration is not emphasized
Best for: Fits when entertainment publishers need hands-on game and entertainment app development for recurring releases.
Nimble AppGenie
agencyApp development company offering entertainment and media streaming app services.
Environment-based release handoff process that tracks build changes through deployment stages for entertainment app production work.
Nimble AppGenie delivers entertainment app work that targets production release needs, not prototype-only delivery.
- +Release workflow supports environment-based handoffs for app builds
- +Entertainment-specific implementation for entitlement-aware user experiences
- +Integration support for playback event capture into reporting systems
- +Project governance emphasizes traceable change handoffs across teams
- –Deeper DRM and codec breadth coverage depends on the provided backend plan
- –Live-streaming customization often requires early requirements lock-in
- –Advanced smart TV extensions may take extra discovery cycles per platform
- –Complex multi-client media stacks can increase coordination overhead
Best for: Fits when entertainment teams need controlled implementation across media integrations and production release handoffs.
Yalantis
agencySoftware development agency building entertainment, streaming, and social apps.
End-to-end orchestration between app client flows and external entertainment services via contract-driven API integration.
Yalantis delivers entertainment app development that covers client app engineering plus media-adjacent backend work for delivery, playback, and engagement flows. The team typically focuses on integration-heavy builds that connect app features to existing services like catalogs, entitlement systems, and analytics pipelines.
- +API-first collaboration for entertainment app feature integration
- +Cross-platform engineering work for consistent playback and engagement UX
- +Experience mapping app events to external analytics and content services
- +Delivery of media-adjacent backends to support catalog and entitlement workflows
- –Media pipeline scope can require clearer boundaries for transcoding responsibilities
- –Governance for multi-team RBAC and audit log trails may need extra alignment
- –Complex DRM workflows often depend on precise client and license provider inputs
- –Adaptive streaming tuning may be constrained by the chosen playback stack
Best for: Fits when a product team needs API-driven entertainment app builds tied to existing content and analytics services.
Konstant Infosolutions
agencyMobile and web development agency serving media and entertainment clients.
Client-side and backend coordination for media-app releases with repeatable post-launch change cycles.
Konstant Infosolutions supports entertainment app development with a delivery model suited to teams that need end-to-end mobile and media-product engineering. The differentiator is execution depth across app features and integration work tied to streaming workflows, including playback, content delivery wiring, and post-launch iteration cycles.
- +Integration-focused delivery for entertainment clients and backend feature wiring
- +Media-app feature implementation with a maintainable iteration workflow
- +Experience applying app-store grade practices to production releases
- +Responsive communication during requirements-to-build handoff cycles
- –Limited published specificity on DRM, licensing workflows, and entitlement models
- –Automation depth for high-throughput media ops is not clearly documented
- –Less transparent API surface details for programmatic content and entitlement control
- –Governance artifacts like audit logs and RBAC patterns are not well evidenced
Best for: Fits when mid-market teams need custom entertainment app engineering plus integration support.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 entertainment app development, ArcTouch stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Entertainment App Development
Entertainment app development sits at the intersection of client playback UX, backend entitlement checks, and production-grade release coordination across environments. This buyer’s guide frames integration depth and automation surface by pulling in delivery patterns from ArcTouch, Chetu, and Zynga, plus support models from Epic Games and Algoworks.
Across the ten providers covered, the differentiator is how consistently playback behavior, analytics event schemas, and user entitlements stay aligned from staging to production. ArcTouch leads on API-driven release automation that keeps playback, entitlement checks, and analytics event schemas aligned across environments, while Chetu emphasizes client-backend integration planning that ties API contracts to entertainment workflows and rollout sequencing.
Entertainment App Development services for OTT, live streaming, and game-to-TV client delivery
Entertainment app development delivers media-ready mobile and connected-viewing clients plus the backend integration work that makes playback, entitlements, and watch analytics behave consistently. ArcTouch focuses on API-driven release automation that aligns playback, entitlement checks, and analytics event schemas across environments, which reduces drift during iterative title launches.
Chetu directs effort into client-backend integration planning that maps API contracts to entertainment workflows and rollout sequencing for multi-platform deployments, including TV surfaces. Algoworks pairs media workflow integration across playback, telemetry, and UI modules with player analytics instrumentation that connects engagement events to watch history across client releases.
Core capabilities that determine entertainment app integration and release reliability
Entertainment app development succeeds when client playback behavior, backend entitlement checks, and telemetry stay aligned from staging to production. Misalignment shows up as broken paywalls, inconsistent watch history, and event gaps during rollout.
The providers covered in this guide separate themselves through release automation depth, API-to-workflow mapping, and how tightly media delivery and analytics are wired into app and backend changes. ArcTouch is the clearest example because it uses API-driven release automation to keep playback, entitlement checks, and analytics event schemas aligned across environments.
API-driven release automation that prevents staging to production drift
ArcTouch focuses on API-driven release automation that keeps playback, entitlement checks, and analytics event schemas aligned across environments. Chetu emphasizes client-backend integration planning that maps API contracts to entertainment workflows and rollout sequencing.
Player analytics instrumentation tied to watch history and engagement events
Algoworks stands out for player analytics instrumentation tied to watch history and engagement events across client releases. ArcTouch also wires consistent event instrumentation so watch-history capture aligns with entitlement-aware playback.
Media workflow integration across playback, telemetry, and UI modules
Algoworks pairs media workflow integration across playback, telemetry, and UI modules with analytics delivery across mobile and OTT-style client surfaces. Blue Label Labs keeps player UX aligned with media product delivery cycles and device behavior constraints.
Controlled environment-based release handoffs for entitlement-aware builds
Nimble AppGenie provides environment-based release handoffs that track build changes through deployment stages for entertainment app production work. ArcTouch complements this with automated alignment of playback, entitlement checks, and analytics schemas across environments.
Governance-ready integration design for multi-stakeholder releases
Chetu connects API contracts to rollout sequencing for multi-platform entertainment clients, including TV surfaces. Yalantis coordinates app client flows with external entertainment services via contract-driven API integration.
How to choose an Entertainment App Development service for predictable delivery
Entertainment app delivery has two failure modes that map directly to vendor capabilities. One failure mode is integration drift between client and backend. The other failure mode is scope drift between media pipeline work, entitlement logic, and analytics requirements.
The decision process should start with how the service ties API contracts to entertainment workflows and then move to how release handoffs are managed across environments. ArcTouch is built around release automation for schema alignment, while Chetu is built around planning API contracts against rollout sequencing for repeatable releases.
Select the provider type by release alignment mechanism
If releases regularly change playback behavior, entitlement checks, and analytics schemas together, ArcTouch’s API-driven release automation is designed to keep those elements aligned across environments. If integration failures come from unclear endpoint ownership, Chetu’s client-backend integration planning ties API contracts to entertainment workflows and rollout sequencing.
Match analytics goals to how telemetry is wired
If watch history accuracy depends on event instrumentation being consistent across client releases, Algoworks ties player analytics instrumentation to watch history and engagement events. If event coverage must stay consistent while features ship alongside entitlement-aware playback, ArcTouch’s event instrumentation wiring aligns playback analytics with telemetry capture.
Confirm who owns media pipeline wiring versus app delivery
Choose Algoworks when media workflow integration across playback, telemetry, and UI modules must be delivered as one package. Choose Cubix when media-first delivery must reduce rework between playback UX and publishing constraints, while acknowledging that DRM and rights workflows require heavier operational involvement.
Use environment and handoff controls for recurring iterations
Choose Nimble AppGenie when controlled environment-based release handoffs matter more than deep streaming-format breadth in the backend plan. Choose Mindinventory when recurring content and feature shipping for live-ops cycles needs hands-on delivery for gameplay and UIs.
Stress-test late-changing requirements against delivery sequencing
If player, entitlement, or catalog requirements often shift late, Chetu’s delivery speed drops under those changes, so integration sequencing must be planned earlier. If analytics and playback must adapt across cross-device contexts, Hyperlink InfoSystem supports mobile-first delivery with backend entitlements and ongoing feature iterations while automation depth may require internal discipline.
Evaluate governance depth based on your org complexity
If multiple teams need structured governance controls, check whether the provider documents RBAC and audit log style governance since Cubix states governance controls for large multi-team orgs are not its strongest documented area. If contract-driven integrations must coordinate between your app flows and external services, Yalantis offers contract-driven API integration but may require extra alignment for governance in multi-team setups.
Who benefits from Entertainment App Development services like these
These services are built for teams where app playback behavior, entitlement logic, and analytics must evolve together during releases. The right fit depends on whether the main risk is integration drift, telemetry inconsistency, or release handoff control.
ArcTouch and Chetu align well with teams focused on API-to-workflow control, while Algoworks and Blue Label Labs align well with teams focused on media workflow and instrumentation. Mindinventory and Nimble AppGenie fit teams running recurring iterations with clear release stages or live-ops loops.
Studios shipping multiple entertainment titles that require coordinated client delivery
ArcTouch fits studio needs because its API-driven release automation keeps playback, entitlement checks, and analytics event schemas aligned across environments. Chetu fits when entitlement and playback failures come from mismatched endpoint ownership and rollout sequencing.
Teams whose watch history and engagement metrics depend on consistent telemetry across clients
Algoworks supports this need by tying player analytics instrumentation to watch history and engagement events across client releases. ArcTouch supports the same outcome by aligning event instrumentation wiring with entitlement-aware playback.
Media product teams that need media workflow integration into app UX and publishing constraints
Blue Label Labs is a fit when entertainment app engineering must align with media product delivery cycles and device behavior constraints. Cubix is a fit when playback UX must stay aligned with production workflows tied to release readiness for app-store and publishing constraints.
Publishers running recurring content updates with continuous release iteration
Mindinventory supports recurring content and feature cycles with live-ops oriented delivery for UIs and engineering. Konstant Infosolutions supports mid-market teams with maintainable iteration workflows for custom media-app feature implementation.
Organizations integrating many external entertainment services with contract-driven APIs
Yalantis fits when app client flows must connect to external entertainment services through contract-driven API integration. Chetu fits when integration planning must map endpoints to specific app workflows for multi-platform deployments.
Common pitfalls when buying Entertainment App Development work
Entertainment app development projects fail when boundaries between client playback, backend entitlement, media pipeline wiring, and telemetry are not defined early. Another failure mode appears when automation and release handoffs are assumed rather than engineered.
These mistakes often show up during late changes to player behavior, entitlement models, or catalog requirements, and they map directly to the constraints described by providers in this guide.
Treating entertainment workflow integration as a generic app build instead of a contract-to-release problem
Chetu calls out that delivery speed drops when player, entitlement, or catalog requirements shift late, which makes early contract and sequencing work non-negotiable. ArcTouch reduces integration drift by keeping playback, entitlement checks, and analytics event schemas aligned across environments through API-driven release automation.
Buying for player telemetry after the playback and entitlement model is already locked
Algoworks highlights that player analytics instrumentation ties to watch history and engagement events across client releases, so event wiring needs to be designed with release planning. Blue Label Labs notes that extensibility depends on how early media services and SDK boundaries are defined.
Leaving DRM, rights workflows, and media packaging responsibilities fuzzy
Cubix states heavier operational involvement is needed for DRM and rights workflows, which can surprise teams expecting lightweight integration. Hyperlink InfoSystem also flags that documentation depth on streaming formats and DRM workflows is not consistently evident, so requirements clarity must be created early.
Assuming environment promotion controls exist without evaluating the handoff mechanism
Nimble AppGenie centers environment-based release handoffs that track build changes through deployment stages, so teams without those controls may see rollback friction. ArcTouch’s environment schema alignment focuses on playback, entitlement, and event schema consistency, so it should be evaluated against the team’s release pipeline shape.
Overextending a provider that is strong in playback UX while your program needs deep streaming-format and DRM breadth
Konstant Infosolutions notes limited published specificity on DRM, licensing workflows, and entitlement models, which can be a gap for teams with complex media rights constraints. Nimble AppGenie flags that deeper DRM and codec breadth coverage depends on the provided backend plan.
How We Selected and Ranked These Providers
We evaluated the top entertainment app development providers by weighting features at 40%, then weighting ease at 30% and value at 30%. ArcTouch ranked highest because its API-driven release automation keeps playback, entitlement checks, and analytics event schemas aligned across environments, which directly reduces integration drift during iterative entertainment title launches.
We scored Chetu highly for contract and rollout sequencing clarity across multi-platform client work, and we scored Algoworks highly for tying player analytics instrumentation to watch history and engagement events. We also separated providers by how their described delivery scope handles media workflow integration, environment handoffs, and ongoing iteration patterns in entertainment releases.
Frequently Asked Questions About Entertainment App Development
How do ArcTouch and Chetu keep API contracts aligned with entertainment client workflows during releases?
What onboarding pattern works when Zynga or Epic Games style teams need rapid integration of multiple third-party services?
When should Mindinventory versus Hyperlink InfoSystem be chosen for iterative live-ops content drops?
Which provider is better for media workflow integration when adaptive bitrate streaming and transcoding are core requirements?
How do Nimble AppGenie and Yalantis handle environment separation for staging and production releases?
What breaks if an entertainment app team delays RBAC design for admin and release controls during development?
How do Algoworks and Konstant Infosolutions differ when watch history and engagement analytics must stay consistent across client builds?
Which approach fits studios that need to replace a fragmented entertainment stack with a unified client-backend integration plan?
What are the common admin control and audit log gaps that appear when teams request fully turnkey catalogs without coordination?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
- Video Games And ConsolesTop 10 Best App Game Development Services of 2026
- MediaTop 10 Best Entertainment Content Services of 2026
- Technology Digital MediaTop 10 Best Enterprise Mobile App Development Services of 2026
- Video Games And ConsolesTop 10 Best Game App Development Software of 2026
- Entertainment EventsTop 10 Best Entertainment Software of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Video Games And Consoles alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of video games and consoles tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare video games and consoles tools→