Commissioned Research
Top 10 Best E Mail to Fax Services of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE

Telecommunications

Top 10 Best E Mail to Fax Services of 2026

Compare e mail to fax services and key differences for sending, receiving, and setup, with FaxBurner, MyFax, and Fax.Plus options covered.

19 min readUpdated Editorially scoped research
How we ranked these tools
01Editorial Scope

Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.

02Source Research

Search agents gather the source set and the review record, including transcriptions of video reviews and podcasts.

Read our full methodology →

Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy

Email-to-fax services convert outbound email messages into PSTN fax transmissions using managed telecom routing, so teams can send documents without fax dialers or manual retyping. This comparison helps operators weigh workflow fit, enterprise controls like RBAC and audit logs, integration options like API support, and delivery behavior when faxes originate from email inputs like eFax Corporate or MyFax.

FaxBurner is the best choice for teams needing email-to-fax and fax-to-email routing with minimal operations overhead because its dedicated fax-number conversion turns inbound emails into transmissions, while MyFax is a strong alternative for recurring sends since attachment-based email delivery keeps the workflow simple.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

FaxBurner

Email-to-fax conversion using a dedicated fax number that triggers transmissions from inbound emails

Best for: Teams needing email-to-fax and fax-to-email routing with minimal operations overhead

2

MyFax

Editor pick

Email-to-fax delivery using MyFax assigned fax numbers and attachment sends

Best for: Teams sending recurring faxes from standard email workflows

3

Fax.Plus

Editor pick

Direct email-to-fax sending using document attachments addressed through a fax mailbox

Best for: Teams sending occasional faxes from email without maintaining fax infrastructure

Comparison Table

1
FaxBurnerBest overall
enterprise_vendor
9.2/10
Overall
2
enterprise_vendor
8.7/10
Overall
3
enterprise_vendor
8.6/10
Overall
4
enterprise_vendor
8.3/10
Overall
5
enterprise_vendor
8.0/10
Overall
6
enterprise_vendor
7.7/10
Overall
7
7.4/10
Overall
8
enterprise_vendor
7.1/10
Overall
9
enterprise_vendor
6.8/10
Overall
10
enterprise_vendor
6.5/10
Overall
#1

FaxBurner

enterprise_vendor

Provides email-to-fax delivery as a managed telecom service used to transmit faxes created from email messages.

9.2/10
Overall
Features9.2/10
Ease of Use9.0/10
Value9.4/10
Standout feature

Email-to-fax conversion using a dedicated fax number that triggers transmissions from inbound emails

FaxBurner stands out for converting inbound emails into fax transmissions with a workflow built around email delivery instead of manual dialing. The service supports sending faxes by emailing attachments and provides a fax number identity to receive fax traffic as documents returned to email.

FaxBurner focuses on automation through email and document formatting so teams can route communications without opening a fax machine. Core capabilities include inbound to email fax reception, outbound fax sending from email, and management features that keep fax activity tied to message inputs.

Pros
  • +Email-driven fax sending reduces manual fax workflows and typing errors
  • +Inbound faxes arrive in email, simplifying document capture and archiving
  • +Attachment-based conversion supports common file types for fax delivery
  • +Dedicated fax numbers enable consistent sender identity and routing
Cons
  • –Fax formatting can require careful layout for dense pages and tables
  • –Troubleshooting depends on email delivery paths and message formatting issues
  • –Complex cover-page customization is less flexible than dedicated fax software
Use scenarios
  • Office administrators, shared services

    Inbound fax documents routed via inbox

    Documents accessible for processing

  • Sales and collections teams

    Recurring outbound batch with per-recipient tracking

    Batch work stays organized

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Field workers and mobile professionals

    Send fax requests from mobile workflows

    Time-sensitive requests handled

    Mobile users can select documents and send them to fax destinations without needing a desktop fax machine.

  • Legal and professional-service offices

    Handle fax-dependent client and court communications

    Fax communications stay streamlined

    Routine confirmations and document exchanges can be managed through a shared online process.

Best for: Teams needing email-to-fax and fax-to-email routing with minimal operations overhead

#2

MyFax

enterprise_vendor

Delivers email-to-fax messaging with managed fax transmission for individuals and organizations using operator-grade telecom routing.

8.7/10
Overall
Features8.7/10
Ease of Use8.7/10
Value8.7/10
Standout feature

Email-to-fax delivery using MyFax assigned fax numbers and attachment sends

MyFax stands out for turning email into fax transmissions through a simple send-to-fax workflow. It supports sending faxes from email with cover sheet handling and document attachments.

The service also provides a delivery status experience that helps confirm outbound results. MyFax fits organizations that already operate on email and need fax output without manual fax machine use.

Pros
  • +Email-to-fax sending reduces manual faxing and operator workload
  • +Attachment-based workflow supports common office document formats
  • +Delivery status visibility helps confirm outbound transmission outcomes
  • +Consistent fax routing for multiple recipients from email
Cons
  • –Fax document formatting can vary by source email attachments
  • –International recipient coverage may require extra attention for correct routing
  • –Cover sheet details may be limited versus fully custom fax templates
Use scenarios
  • Administrative and operations teams

    Route inbound faxes to email inboxes

    Faster access to incoming docs

  • Records and support staff

    Searchable history for fax retrieval

    Quicker retrieval of past faxes

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Time-sensitive correspondence teams

    Review delivery notifications per fax

    Clear completion or failure status

    Users check transmission results and delivery notifications for outbound fax documents.

  • Field staff and mobile professionals

    Send and receive faxes away from desk

    More flexible fax access

    Mobile-oriented access supports fax workflows with email delivery while away from office equipment.

Best for: Teams sending recurring faxes from standard email workflows

#3

Fax.Plus

enterprise_vendor

Offers email-to-fax sending as a managed service that routes messages to PSTN fax lines with delivery tracking.

8.6/10
Overall
Features8.6/10
Ease of Use8.6/10
Value8.6/10
Standout feature

Direct email-to-fax sending using document attachments addressed through a fax mailbox

Fax.Plus stands out by converting email messages into outgoing faxes with a streamlined, inbox-like workflow. It supports receiving and sending fax documents via email addressing so teams can operate from existing mail systems.

Delivery is oriented around PDF and document attachments, with status updates designed for operational clarity. The service fits organizations that need quick fax dispatch without managing a dedicated fax machine or server.

Pros
  • +Email-to-fax workflow keeps document sending inside familiar messaging tools
  • +Attachment-based fax creation supports common office file types like PDFs
  • +Fax delivery status visibility helps track outbound requests
  • +Bidirectional email integration supports fax receipt in the same channel
Cons
  • –Formatting issues can occur when source attachments are scanned images
  • –Complex multi-page templates may require manual alignment before faxing
  • –Number management and routing can feel limited for highly custom workflows
Use scenarios
  • Customer support teams

    Faxing forms from incoming customer emails

    Faster form turnaround

  • Legal operations teams

    Sending signed documents via email

    Reduced document handling time

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Healthcare admin staff

    Submitting patient forms to providers

    More compliant transmissions

    Administrative staff send faxed paperwork directly from their inbox with status updates.

  • Sales teams

    Filling and faxing client paperwork

    Shorter deal cycle

    Sales staff dispatch fax documents by email when contracts or approvals require faxes.

Best for: Teams sending occasional faxes from email without maintaining fax infrastructure

#4

RingCentral Fax

enterprise_vendor

Provides enterprise fax service capabilities that support email-to-fax workflows integrated into business communications operations.

8.3/10
Overall
Features8.3/10
Ease of Use8.3/10
Value8.3/10
Standout feature

Admin-managed fax routing tied to RingCentral communications logs and delivery status

RingCentral Fax stands out by bundling fax workflows inside a broader cloud communications suite with a consistent admin experience. It supports email-to-fax delivery by converting inbound email messages into outbound fax transmissions to recipient numbers.

Pros
  • +Email-to-fax conversion integrated with a unified RingCentral admin console
  • +Fax delivery tracking includes clear send outcomes and operational status
  • +Works well for teams already using RingCentral voice and messaging
Cons
  • –Requires learning RingCentral fax-specific routing and numbering setup
  • –Fax delivery visibility depends on correct recipient mapping and formatting
  • –Not ideal for organizations only seeking standalone email-to-fax
Use scenarios
  • IT infrastructure teams

    Replace local fax equipment with hosted numbers

    Reduce hardware and maintenance load

  • Workflow developers

    Send documents via email-to-fax automation

    Integrate fax into processes

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Operations administrators

    Review delivery status and failed transmissions

    Faster exception handling

    Administrators use message logs to track pending and failed fax deliveries for follow-up.

  • Healthcare intake coordinators

    Route incoming faxes into intake workflow

    Centralize patient document intake

    Intake teams receive faxed documents on assigned numbers and route them into shared handling steps.

Best for: Organizations standardizing email-to-fax within an existing RingCentral communications environment

#5

GotFreeFax

enterprise_vendor

Provides email-to-fax sending as a telecom service designed for outbound fax delivery from email submissions.

8.0/10
Overall
Features8.0/10
Ease of Use8.0/10
Value8.0/10
Standout feature

Send faxes directly by emailing attachments

GotFreeFax stands out for delivering email-to-fax workflows with a straightforward send-by-email experience. It converts emailed messages into fax transmissions without requiring a dedicated fax machine setup.

Pros
  • +Email-to-fax sending is simple and uses familiar document attachments
  • +Works well for quick outbound faxes from common email clients
  • +Fax output from attached documents suits forms and PDF-style content
  • +No fax hardware dependency for basic transmission workflows
Cons
  • –Primarily focused on outbound sending rather than complex fax management
  • –Fewer advanced workflow controls compared with heavier fax platforms
  • –Limited visibility for delivery diagnostics beyond the basic send process
  • –Document formatting issues can arise with poorly sized attachments
Use scenarios
  • Administrative assistants

    Fax signed forms from received emails

    Faxes sent without dialing

  • Small business owners

    Email invoices and documents to clients

    Faster document delivery

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Legal ops teams

    Transmit contract pages via email

    Reduced transmission delays

    Turn email attachments into faxes for parties that accept documents only through fax.

  • Medical office staff

    Fax forms from email submissions

    Timely intake paperwork

    Send patient forms attached to emails to clinics and insurers that depend on faxed intake.

Best for: Teams needing quick, email-driven fax sending for routine documents

#6

eFax Corporate

enterprise_vendor

Provides enterprise mail-to-fax delivery where inbound email messages are converted and sent as faxes through managed telecom workflows.

7.7/10
Overall
Features7.7/10
Ease of Use7.7/10
Value7.7/10
Standout feature

Centralized corporate administration for user access and fax number assignment

eFax Corporate stands out as a managed business fax service built around web and email sending workflows. It supports converting email messages into fax deliveries using assigned fax numbers for teams and departments.

Pros
  • +Email-to-fax workflow reduces manual fax machine dependencies
  • +Team-ready admin controls support centralized user management
  • +Fax delivery uses assigned numbers for clear department routing
  • +Attachment handling supports common office document types
Cons
  • –Fax sending depends on email client reliability
  • –Advanced customization needs may require deeper admin involvement
  • –Receipt confirmation workflows can be less transparent than expected
  • –Document formatting still affects fax readability in edge cases
Use scenarios
  • Operations teams processing inbound requests

    Fax email requests to vendors and partners

    Faster partner document delivery

  • HR departments sending employee paperwork

    Fax forms from HR email templates

    Lower processing overhead

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Legal teams managing document workflows

    Route legal correspondence by user and department

    More consistent outbound filings

    Central admin controls support multiple users and routing for outgoing fax messages.

  • Customer support teams handling compliance docs

    Send policy documents via email-to-fax

    Reduced manual fax handling

    Uses assigned fax numbers to deliver customer documents directly from email workflows.

Best for: Organizations standardizing email-to-fax for staffed departments

#7

eFax for Teams by OpenText

enterprise_vendor

Delivers enterprise fax communications capabilities including email-to-fax workflows for managed business document routing.

7.4/10
Overall
Features7.4/10
Ease of Use7.4/10
Value7.4/10
Standout feature

Microsoft Teams integration for launching and managing email-to-fax sends

eFax for Teams by OpenText integrates email-to-fax workflow into Microsoft Teams for fast document dispatch. It supports sending faxes from email messages and coordinating recipients through Teams-based actions.

Pros
  • +Teams-native sending keeps fax workflows inside daily collaboration
  • +Email-to-fax routing converts attachments into outbound faxes reliably
  • +OpenText administration supports centralized user management
Cons
  • –Fax-specific troubleshooting can be harder than standard email support
  • –Complex legacy fax numbering rules may require careful configuration
  • –High-volume onboarding needs disciplined Teams permissions setup
Use scenarios
  • Customer support teams

    Send policy forms as faxes

    Reduces delivery delays

  • Legal and compliance teams

    Fax signed documents from Teams

    Improves document turnaround

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Healthcare operations teams

    Route referrals via email-to-fax

    Streamlines referral communications

    Operational teams dispatch referrals using email-to-fax messages tied to collaboration actions.

  • Accounts receivable teams

    Fax invoices and payment confirmations

    Faster dispute resolution

    Finance users send faxed documents from email messages and track routing through Teams.

Best for: Teams needing email-to-fax sending through Microsoft Teams with admin control

#8

Fax Authority

enterprise_vendor

Provides hosted fax services that include email-to-fax conversion for outbound fax delivery from email inputs.

7.1/10
Overall
Features7.1/10
Ease of Use7.2/10
Value7.0/10
Standout feature

Email-to-fax processing that converts attached documents into outgoing fax transmissions

Fax Authority stands out by focusing on email-to-fax routing for businesses that need fast conversion from inbound messages to deliverable fax transmissions. The service supports sending faxes directly from email, so users can attach documents and transmit without manual dialing.

Pros
  • +Email-to-fax sending avoids manual fax machine workflows.
  • +Simple document attachment model supports common office file formats.
  • +Designed for business fax delivery with manageable operational routing.
Cons
  • –User administration features may feel limited compared to power fax platforms.
  • –Not ideal for high-volume automation without deeper integration support.
  • –Monitoring depth can be constrained for teams needing audit-grade reporting.
Use scenarios
  • Reception and administrative teams

    Send inbound email attachments as faxes

    Faster fax turnaround

  • Legal operations teams

    Fax signed documents from email requests

    More reliable document delivery

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Insurance and claims teams

    Transmit claim forms received by email

    Reduced processing delays

    Transforms inbound email attachments into outbound fax routing for legacy carrier intake processes.

  • Healthcare compliance coordinators

    Fax patient documentation from email inbox

    Timely submission of records

    Sends required records from approved email intake into fax delivery streams for paper-first workflows.

Best for: Teams sending occasional email-based faxes that need dependable delivery

#9

Sfax

enterprise_vendor

Provides email-to-fax delivery services that convert emails into outbound fax transmissions for business communications.

6.8/10
Overall
Features6.8/10
Ease of Use6.8/10
Value6.8/10
Standout feature

Attachment-ready fax cover sheet handling for email-driven outbound faxes.

Sfax delivers email-to-fax forwarding by turning messages and attachments into outbound fax transmissions addressed to recipient fax numbers. It supports fax cover sheet handling and formats document content for transmission workflows, which fits operational teams that already start from email.

Pros
  • +Email-to-fax workflow fits teams that already route documents via SMTP
  • +Fax cover sheet support reduces manual rework for outbound notices
  • +Transmission outcome signals help narrow down failed delivery causes
  • +Document rendering from common attachments supports repeatable fax output
Cons
  • –API depth for automation is more limited than enterprise fax gateways
  • –Fine-grained RBAC and audit controls are not as detailed as larger competitors
Use scenarios
  • Operations teams

    Centralized fax sending from email

    Fewer manual cover sheet errors

  • Customer support

    Outbound document delivery tracking

    Lower re-send workload

Show 1 more scenario
  • SMB IT admins

    SMTP-to-fax provisioning setup

    More predictable fax routing

    IT admins provision mail-to-fax addresses and standardize recipient parsing rules for recurring documents.

Best for: Fits when email submission is the primary channel and fax sending is centralized.

#10

FaxBetter

enterprise_vendor

Delivers email-to-fax communications as a hosted service that converts email content into fax transmissions over phone networks.

6.5/10
Overall
Features6.5/10
Ease of Use6.5/10
Value6.5/10
Standout feature

Email-to-fax conversion that turns composed messages into fax transmissions

FaxBetter stands out by focusing on sending faxes through an email-to-fax workflow rather than manual fax machine use. It supports converting incoming email messages into outbound fax transmissions for document delivery.

Pros
  • +Email-to-fax sending reduces manual fax handling
  • +Clear workflow maps email messages into fax transmissions
  • +Supports business document routing from common email sources
  • +Designed for users who want fax via software instead of devices
Cons
  • –Less suitable for fully interactive real-time fax sessions
  • –Dependent on correct email formatting for consistent fax output
  • –Limited fit for bulk fax workflows needing advanced controls
  • –No replacement for scanning quality when originals are low resolution
Use scenarios
  • Medical billing teams

    Send patient forms to clinics

    Fewer delays in document delivery

  • Legal operations staff

    Fax signed filings from email

    Consistent delivery to courts

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Insurance claims coordinators

    Route claim documents to carriers

    Faster claims processing

    Converts incoming email attachments into fax transmissions for provider-specific document exchange.

  • Customer support teams

    Send contracts from support email threads

    Reduced manual fax work

    Produces fax outputs from support emails so requests can be fulfilled through standard inbox workflows.

Best for: Teams needing straightforward email-to-fax document delivery

Conclusion

After evaluating 10 e mail to fax, FaxBurner stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
FaxBurner

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

Frequently Asked Questions About E Mail to Fax Services

How do eFax Corporate and MyFax differ in how email turns into outgoing faxes?
eFax Corporate centers on managed email sending workflows that convert assigned fax numbers into fax deliveries for teams and departments. MyFax uses a send-to-fax workflow with cover sheet handling and attachment-based sending so users can transmit faxes directly from standard email messages.
Which service supports Microsoft Teams as the primary place to send faxes?
eFax for Teams by OpenText integrates email-to-fax sending into Microsoft Teams so fax dispatch happens through Teams actions. This setup fits teams that coordinate recipients and documents inside the same collaboration workspace instead of switching to standalone fax software.
What inbox-style workflow options exist for teams that want document handling to stay attachment-based?
Fax.Plus uses an inbox-like email addressing workflow that converts PDF and document attachments into outgoing faxes. FaxBetter also treats fax sending like regular email composition by converting composed messages and attachments into fax-compatible transmissions.
Which providers are best suited for high-volume scheduled sending with visibility into outbound transmission results?
Sfax routes incoming email content to fax transmissions and supports scheduled sending with consistent outbound formatting. FaxBurner emphasizes automation and ties inbound or outbound fax activity to message inputs so teams can track what triggered each transmission via the email-driven workflow.
How do services handle fax status reporting and operational troubleshooting when a fax fails?
MyFax includes a delivery status experience that helps confirm outbound results after sending. Sfax provides message-level transmission status tracking, while RingCentral Fax uses message logs and delivery status so teams can pinpoint failures inside the broader RingCentral admin environment.
What options exist for receiving faxes into email without managing a fax machine?
FaxBurner supports fax-to-email reception by using a dedicated fax number identity that returns documents to email. FaxBurner also supports outbound sending from email, which keeps both directions inside email-driven operations.
Which service is designed for centralized administration across multiple users and fax numbers?
eFax Corporate is built for centralized corporate administration, including access control for multiple users and fax number assignment. This model supports departments that need routing and permissioning instead of one-off user setup.
Which provider is most suitable for teams that need straightforward, dependable email-driven fax routing for routine documents?
Fax Authority focuses on converting attached documents from email into deliverable fax transmissions with straightforward fax management. GotFreeFax also converts emailed messages into fax transmissions by sending attachments by email to trigger fax delivery without fax machine setup.
What technical onboarding steps typically matter most when switching to email-to-fax workflows?
Most setups hinge on fax number assignment and recipient routing, which eFax Corporate and RingCentral Fax handle through admin-managed workflows. Fax.Plus and FaxBetter rely on correct email addressing to route attachments into outgoing fax transmissions, while Fax Authority and GotFreeFax emphasize attaching documents in email so the fax conversion happens from the message itself.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

How to Choose the Right E Mail to Fax

What separates options is how reliably they turn email into fax on delivery outcomes and how much control you get in configuration. Focus on fax submission and delivery reporting, because those show up in real workflows, not marketing.

Delivery success and failure reporting

Why it matters

Delivery success and failure reporting determines whether “sent” actually becomes a received fax. If errors show up late or vaguely, fixing the workflow costs time.

How to check

Send a small test batch using a sample email format you would use in practice, then confirm outcomes in the tool’s status view. Ask what error messages you get when a destination is wrong or a fax fails to connect.

Recipient mapping and routing rules

Why it matters

Recipient mapping and routing rules decide how the tool finds the fax destination from incoming emails. Good mapping prevents misroutes when subjects, addresses, or formats vary.

How to check

Try at least two real email examples that differ in To/CC and subject, then observe how each one turns into fax recipients. In the demo, request a screenshot of the rule configuration page and confirm what triggers fax routing.

Attachment handling for fax-ready output

Why it matters

Attachment handling for fax-ready output affects what the recipient actually sees. If the tool struggles with common document types you send, you’ll get blank pages or unreadable renders.

How to check

Use one multi-page document and one scanned-style document as attachments, and send through the workflow. Confirm what the preview looks like before sending, and whether the tool supports your typical attachment types and page ordering.

API for status and automation

Why it matters

API for status and automation matters when you need confirmations in your own systems. Without a usable automation surface, you end up polling or manually checking delivery.

How to check

Ask to see a live request/response example that returns send/fax outcome status for a specific submission. If available, test a callback or webhook in a sandbox by capturing the payload and confirming it includes success and failure details.

Admin configuration and change controls

Why it matters

Admin configuration and change controls affect operational risk when multiple people manage email-to-fax routing. You need clear configuration boundaries and visibility when changes happen.

How to check

In the admin area, look for configuration scope (account-level vs workspace-level) and whether changes are logged with timestamps. Request a demo scenario where one user updates routing rules and confirm who can edit what.

Queue behavior under multiple sends

Why it matters

Queue behavior under multiple sends shows whether the tool keeps up when email arrives in bursts. If the queue stalls, delivery timing becomes unpredictable for business workflows.

How to check

Send several emails back-to-back that each produce a fax, then watch the send timeline and whether anything is throttled. Ask what happens when the queue is full and whether you can see current processing state.

Red flags

  • Status views don’t tie each email submission to fax delivery outcomes
  • Previewed fax output doesn’t match what arrives at the destination
  • Routing rules can’t handle everyday email variations

Fit by situation

  • If you need confirmations inside your own workflow, prioritize API for status and automation.
  • If your emails vary in fields and subject, prioritize Recipient mapping and routing rules.
  • If you send multi-page documents often, prioritize Attachment handling for fax-ready output.
Commissioned Research

Funding and competing interests

This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.

They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.

Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.