Top 10 Best Data Migration Services of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE

Digital Transformation In Industry

Top 10 Best Data Migration Services of 2026

Ten ranked data migration services are compared by capabilities, fit, and tradeoffs, with provider notes for teams selecting a suitable partner.

28 min readUpdated AI-verified · Expert reviewed
How we ranked these tools
01Feature Verification

Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.

02Multimedia Review Aggregation

Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.

03Synthetic User Modeling

AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.

04Human Editorial Review

Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.

Read our full methodology →

Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy

Data migration providers assess source systems, map schemas, convert records, validate outputs, and manage cutover across cloud, ERP, and legacy platforms. This ranking helps analysts, operators, and technical evaluators compare provider depth, delivery control, industry experience, and post-migration support against the tradeoff between migration speed and data integrity.

Hexaware is the strongest overall choice for large, regulated enterprises moving complex legacy, warehouse, database, or ERP data into the cloud, while EY is the better fit when global teams need governed migration across regions, applications, and regulatory environments.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

Hexaware

Hexaware’s standout strength is the combination of its Amaze® automation platform and broad implementation practice. Amaze® supports automated discovery, readiness analysis, code and workload conversion, migration execution, and validation, while Hexaware supplies the architecture, industry expertise, cloud partnerships, and production support needed to turn those accelerators into large-scale transformation programs.

Built for large and regulated enterprises migrating data warehouses, databases, analytics estates, ERP platforms, or industry applications across complex legacy and cloud environments..

2

EY

Editor pick

EY alliance-led migration architecture spanning SAP, Oracle, Microsoft Azure, Salesforce, and legacy estates.

Built for fits when global enterprises need governed migration delivery across complex applications, regions, and regulatory environments..

3

Infosys

Editor pick

Infosys Cobalt migration factory combines reusable cloud patterns, automated assessment assets, and hyperscaler-specific execution playbooks.

Built for fits when large enterprises need managed migration across cloud, ERP, and regional application estates..

Comparison Table

1
HexawareBest overall
enterprise_vendor
9.3/10
Overall
2
enterprise_vendor
9.0/10
Overall
3
enterprise_vendor
8.7/10
Overall
4
enterprise_vendor
8.4/10
Overall
5
enterprise_vendor
8.1/10
Overall
6
enterprise_vendor
7.8/10
Overall
7
enterprise_vendor
7.5/10
Overall
8
enterprise_vendor
7.2/10
Overall
9
enterprise_vendor
6.9/10
Overall
10
enterprise_vendor
6.6/10
Overall
#1

Hexaware

enterprise_vendor

Hexaware designs, builds, modernizes, and operates enterprise AI applications using generative AI engineering, proprietary software platforms, cloud services, data engineering, and industry-focused digital product development.

9.3/10
Overall
Features9.3/10
Ease of Use9.5/10
Value9.2/10
Standout feature

Hexaware’s standout strength is the combination of its Amaze® automation platform and broad implementation practice. Amaze® supports automated discovery, readiness analysis, code and workload conversion, migration execution, and validation, while Hexaware supplies the architecture, industry expertise, cloud partnerships, and production support needed to turn those accelerators into large-scale transformation programs.

Hexaware covers the migration lifecycle from advisory assessment and discovery through conversion, cloud deployment, testing, go-live, hyper-care, and ongoing support. Its documented work includes moving Cloudera data lakes to Azure Databricks, Oracle and Teradata warehouses to AWS and Snowflake, MySQL databases to Azure, SAS workloads to PySpark, and policy data between insurance administration platforms. Amaze® adds reusable automation for workload analysis, metadata extraction, code conversion, migration planning, and data validation, helping Hexaware handle large portfolios rather than isolated database moves.

The tradeoff is that Hexaware is designed for complex enterprise programs, so engagements typically involve substantial architecture, integration, testing, and client-side coordination rather than a lightweight self-service migration. It is particularly well suited to an insurer consolidating policy systems, a healthcare organization modernizing a regulated data lake, or a financial institution replacing legacy analytics infrastructure while preserving business logic.

Pros
  • +Amaze® provides automated assessment, workload analysis, code conversion, migration orchestration, and validation across application and data environments.
  • +Strong coverage of major cloud and data platforms, including AWS, Azure, Snowflake, Databricks, Redshift, PostgreSQL, and enterprise SaaS systems.
  • +Demonstrated experience with regulated and complex industries such as healthcare, insurance, banking, pharmaceuticals, legal services, and mining.
  • +Offers advisory, conversion, infrastructure, implementation, testing, go-live, and managed support capabilities through one provider.
Cons
  • Enterprise-scale delivery usually requires significant client involvement, architecture decisions, and governance discipline.
  • The breadth of Hexaware’s portfolio can make the engagement feel more complex than a narrowly focused database migration specialist.
  • Publicly described capabilities emphasize large transformation programs, so smaller migration projects may not receive the same level of packaged specialization.
Use scenarios
  • Insurance transformation teams

    Consolidating acquired policy administration systems

    Unified policy operations

  • Healthcare data leaders

    Modernizing a regulated data lake

    Faster governed insights

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Financial services CIOs

    Replacing legacy warehouse infrastructure

    Modern analytics foundation

    Hexaware modernizes warehouse code and pipelines for AWS, Snowflake, or Azure while preserving reporting and business logic.

  • Mining operations teams

    Migrating sensor analytics to Snowflake

    Near-real-time operational analysis

    Hexaware combines application modernization with cloud data engineering to analyze high-volume equipment data more quickly.

Best for: Large and regulated enterprises migrating data warehouses, databases, analytics estates, ERP platforms, or industry applications across complex legacy and cloud environments.

#2

EY

enterprise_vendor

Big Four firm offering data migration services for ERP transformations and regulatory reporting systems.

9.0/10
Overall
Features9.0/10
Ease of Use9.2/10
Value8.8/10
Standout feature

EY alliance-led migration architecture spanning SAP, Oracle, Microsoft Azure, Salesforce, and legacy estates.

Large ERP and CRM programs benefit from EY's integration work across SAP S/4HANA, Oracle, Microsoft Azure, Salesforce, and proprietary legacy applications. Teams can define schema mapping, transformation rules, validation controls, and rollback procedures while EY coordinates architecture, testing, security, and business readiness.

EY's delivery model suits multi-country programs needing migration wave planning, regulatory controls, and executive reporting. The tradeoff is heavier governance and consulting involvement than specialist migration software, which fits carve-outs, ERP modernization, and large merger integrations.

Pros
  • +Alliance coverage spans SAP, Oracle, Microsoft, Salesforce, and major cloud providers.
  • +Industry teams address privacy, retention, and regulatory control requirements.
  • +Large delivery teams support multi-country cutovers and complex dependencies.
  • +Schema mapping can be tailored to heterogeneous legacy estates.
Cons
  • Engagements depend on substantial client governance and decision capacity.
  • Delivery quality can vary across member firms, subcontractors, and local teams.
  • Smaller migrations may receive more consulting process than the scope requires.
Use scenarios
  • Global enterprise IT teams

    Modernizing multinational ERP estates

    Controlled global cutover

  • M&A integration teams

    Combining acquired business data estates

    Unified operating data

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Regulated financial institutions

    Moving customer data into cloud platforms

    Auditable cloud transition

    EY combines privacy controls, lineage documentation, testing evidence, and cloud architecture for regulated workloads.

  • Public sector technology offices

    Replacing aging government applications

    Lower transition risk

    EY coordinates legacy dependencies, procurement constraints, user acceptance testing, and phased service transition.

Best for: Fits when global enterprises need governed migration delivery across complex applications, regions, and regulatory environments.

#3

Infosys

enterprise_vendor

Digital services and consulting firm offering data migration as part of cloud and data modernization engagements.

8.7/10
Overall
Features8.5/10
Ease of Use8.9/10
Value8.7/10
Standout feature

Infosys Cobalt migration factory combines reusable cloud patterns, automated assessment assets, and hyperscaler-specific execution playbooks.

Infosys combines source assessment, data profiling, and schema mapping with cloud architecture, integration engineering, testing, and operational handover. Infosys Cobalt adds reusable automation assets, migration factories, and hyperscaler-specific patterns for AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, SAP, and Oracle estates. That structure supports migration wave planning across distributed business units and environments.

The tradeoff is coordination overhead because global teams, cloud partners, and client owners must align on sequencing and accountability. Infosys fits a multinational manufacturer consolidating regional ERP systems while retaining controlled validation and operational handover.

Pros
  • +Infosys Cobalt packages reusable cloud migration patterns for AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud.
  • +Global delivery teams support multilingual, multi-country migration programs.
  • +Industry accelerators address SAP, Oracle, and regulated-sector data estates.
  • +Automation assets reduce repeated assessment and conversion work.
Cons
  • Large programs require coordination across Infosys teams, cloud partners, and client owners.
  • Public materials provide less product-level visibility than dedicated migration software vendors.
  • Smaller transfers may receive heavier governance than their scope requires.
  • Engagement quality depends on assigned architects and client-side data ownership.
Use scenarios
  • Global IT transformation teams

    Consolidating regional ERP estates

    Unified operating data

  • SAP program directors

    Moving global SAP landscapes

    Coordinated SAP transition

Show 1 more scenario
  • Cloud platform teams

    Modernizing legacy application estates

    Repeatable migration execution

    Cobalt supplies cloud patterns, automation assets, and partner integrations for phased modernization programs.

Best for: Fits when large enterprises need managed migration across cloud, ERP, and regional application estates.

#4

PwC

enterprise_vendor

Professional services network providing data migration advisory and implementation for finance and operations systems.

8.4/10
Overall
Features8.2/10
Ease of Use8.5/10
Value8.6/10
Standout feature

Industry-led migration governance links data movement to process redesign, compliance controls, and post-migration ownership.

PwC differentiates its data migration work through industry-led delivery that connects technical movement with operating-model redesign and regulatory control. Teams assess source estates, apply data profiling, and coordinate transformation across ERP, CRM, cloud, and analytics environments.

Schema mapping and cutover planning support controlled movement between legacy and target systems. PwC is strongest for large programs requiring executive governance, cross-functional coordination, and post-migration ownership, but its delivery model is heavier than focused technical engagements.

Pros
  • +Strong data profiling and source-estate assessment for complex portfolios.
  • +Industry specialists connect migration scope to process and compliance requirements.
  • +Broad alliances support ERP, CRM, cloud, and analytics target environments.
  • +Executive governance supports multi-workstream transformation programs.
Cons
  • Delivery quality can vary across countries, practices, and implementation teams.
  • Large programs may introduce heavier governance than focused migrations require.
  • Tooling depends on selected cloud, ERP, and implementation partners rather than one PwC-native stack.
  • Public materials provide limited technical detail on native API controls and automation.

Best for: Fits when regulated enterprises need migration delivery tied to operating-model change across ERP, CRM, and cloud estates.

#5

Accenture

enterprise_vendor

Global professional services firm delivering end-to-end data migration consulting across cloud, ERP, and legacy platforms.

8.1/10
Overall
Features8.1/10
Ease of Use7.9/10
Value8.2/10
Standout feature

myNav's automated cloud assessment and landing-zone planning connects estate discovery with migration sequencing and target architecture design.

Accenture migrates enterprise data across legacy, cloud, and packaged systems through migration factories and industry-specific delivery teams. Programs commonly cover data profiling, schema mapping, and reconciliation controls alongside application modernization and cloud architecture. myNav adds automated cloud assessment and landing-zone planning, while Accenture teams coordinate testing, deployment, and post-migration operations.

Pros
  • +Migration factories support repeatable execution across large application and data estates.
  • +myNav automates cloud assessment, workload grouping, and target-environment planning.
  • +Industry teams address SAP, mainframe, healthcare, financial-services, and public-sector data constraints.
  • +Managed services can extend migration governance into post-migration operations.
Cons
  • Large programs require substantial coordination across Accenture teams and incumbent vendors.
  • Delivery quality depends heavily on the assigned practice, geography, and subcontractor mix.
  • Smaller migrations may receive enterprise-scale process overhead.
  • Public documentation provides less technical detail than product-led migration tools.

Best for: Fits when global enterprises need coordinated migration across legacy estates, cloud platforms, applications, and regulated business units.

#6

Deloitte

enterprise_vendor

Big Four consultancy offering data migration strategy, execution, and validation services for enterprise transformations.

7.8/10
Overall
Features7.4/10
Ease of Use8.0/10
Value8.0/10
Standout feature

Industry-specific migration playbooks paired with Deloitte’s migration factory model for complex ERP and cloud transformation programs.

Deloitte differentiates its data migration work through consulting-led transformation programs that combine source-system assessment, cloud architecture, and operating-model redesign. Delivery teams cover schema mapping, integration dependencies, data quality controls, and controlled release sequencing across ERP, CRM, analytics, and core banking estates.

API architecture, governance, testing coordination, and post-migration support extend the work beyond isolated file movement. The approach suits regulated or multinational programs, but smaller migrations may receive more consulting overhead than needed.

Pros
  • +Industry-specific playbooks cover ERP, CRM, analytics, and regulated-sector migrations.
  • +Global teams coordinate architecture, testing, governance, and post-cutover support.
  • +Schema mapping and integration design address complex application dependencies.
  • +Migration factory methods support repeatable delivery across multiple business units.
Cons
  • Large engagements can add consulting overhead to small, narrowly scoped database moves.
  • Delivery consistency can vary across Deloitte member firms and regional teams.
  • Client subject-matter experts remain necessary for business-rule validation and acceptance testing.
  • Product-level automation visibility is thinner than specialist migration software vendors.

Best for: Fits when multinational organizations need governed migration across ERP, CRM, and data warehouse estates.

#7

IBM

enterprise_vendor

Technology and consulting services firm providing data migration and modernization services for hybrid cloud environments.

7.5/10
Overall
Features7.7/10
Ease of Use7.4/10
Value7.2/10
Standout feature

IBM Aspera FASP accelerates large-file migration across high-latency networks without depending on ordinary file-protocol throughput.

IBM differs from narrower migration vendors by combining consulting-led programs with DataStage, Cloud Pak for Data, and Aspera transfer technology. DataStage handles parallel ETL workloads across relational, mainframe, cloud, and file-based systems.

InfoSphere Data Replication supports CDC for incremental movement, while Aspera addresses large-file transfers over high-latency networks. The portfolio offers broad governance and deployment flexibility, but delivery depends on specialist expertise and careful product selection.

Pros
  • +DataStage runs parallel ETL jobs across heterogeneous enterprise sources.
  • +IBM Aspera FASP moves large files efficiently across high-latency networks.
  • +Cloud Pak for Data provides catalog, policy, and RBAC controls in a shared workspace.
  • +IBM Consulting supports mainframe, SAP, Oracle, and cloud migration programs.
Cons
  • Product selection across DataStage, Data Replication, Aspera, and Cloud Pak for Data increases architecture effort.
  • Self-service setup is less approachable than specialist migration suites.
  • Many delivery patterns depend on IBM consulting engagement rather than one packaged workflow.
  • Legacy application cutovers can require separate testing and reconciliation design.

Best for: Fits when multinational enterprises need governed migrations across mainframe, database, and cloud estates.

#8

Capgemini

enterprise_vendor

Global IT services provider specializing in cloud data migration and SAP system data transitions.

7.2/10
Overall
Features7.0/10
Ease of Use7.3/10
Value7.3/10
Standout feature

Capgemini Data Migration Factory combines reusable migration accelerators with managed ERP, application, and cloud delivery workstreams.

Capgemini combines a Data Migration Factory delivery model with consulting for ERP, application, and cloud estate transitions. Its teams cover source assessment, ETL design, data cleansing, reconciliation, and cutover planning across SAP and non-SAP environments. The service suits complex programs that need architecture governance and managed execution, but smaller migrations may receive more process than they require.

Pros
  • +Data Migration Factory supports repeatable delivery across ERP, application, and cloud estates.
  • +SAP migration expertise covers data cleansing, validation, and business-process dependencies.
  • +Global delivery teams support large programs with governance, testing, and cutover coordination.
Cons
  • Engagements require substantial client governance and subject-matter participation.
  • Delivery quality can depend on the assigned regional team and technology partners.
  • Smaller migrations may face consulting overhead beyond their technical requirements.

Best for: Fits when large enterprises need managed migration across SAP, cloud, and legacy application estates.

#9

Cognizant

enterprise_vendor

IT services company delivering data migration and data platform modernization for healthcare and financial sectors.

6.9/10
Overall
Features7.1/10
Ease of Use6.6/10
Value6.9/10
Standout feature

Data Modernization Factory pairs reusable migration accelerators with Cognizant’s industry-specific engineering teams.

Cognizant migrates legacy application and warehouse data into cloud estates through a consulting-led data modernization practice. Its Data Modernization Factory combines reusable migration accelerators with industry-specific engineering teams.

Delivery covers schema mapping, data profiling, transformation, validation, and cutover planning across large programs. API and automation depth depends on the selected cloud architecture and project team rather than a single public migration product.

Pros
  • +Data Modernization Factory combines reusable accelerators with industry-specific engineering teams.
  • +Coverage spans AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud target environments.
  • +Industry expertise addresses banking, healthcare, insurance, and public-sector migration constraints.
  • +Data profiling supports early assessment of legacy data quality.
Cons
  • Delivery quality varies with the assigned consulting team and subcontractor mix.
  • Public materials provide limited detail on a standardized migration API surface.
  • Smaller projects may receive heavier governance and consulting overhead.
  • Application modernization dependencies can expand scope beyond data movement.

Best for: Fits when enterprise programs need consulting-led modernization across legacy applications and cloud data estates.

#10

KPMG

enterprise_vendor

Professional services firm specializing in data migration for finance transformation and regulatory reporting.

6.6/10
Overall
Features6.4/10
Ease of Use6.7/10
Value6.7/10
Standout feature

KPMG’s Powered Enterprise framework links preconfigured ERP operating models to implementation, data, and change workstreams.

KPMG suits regulated enterprises moving finance-heavy workloads where governance and implementation coordination matter more than self-service tooling. KPMG combines source-system assessment, data transformation, cloud migration, and application modernization across SAP, Oracle, Microsoft, AWS, and Azure environments. Its delivery model connects migration wave planning with controls for data quality, security, and operating-model change, but public service material gives less product-level detail about reusable APIs and automation than specialist migration vendors.

Pros
  • +Strong governance for regulated ERP and finance migrations
  • +Coordinates SAP, Oracle, Microsoft, and cloud transformation workstreams
  • +Connects migration planning with operating-model and compliance controls
Cons
  • Limited public detail on reusable migration APIs and automation assets
  • Large consulting engagements require substantial client-side coordination
  • Less suitable for small, self-directed migrations than specialist tools

Best for: Fits when regulated enterprises need coordinated ERP migration, governance, and post-cutover operating-model support.

Conclusion

After evaluating 10 digital transformation in industry, Hexaware stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
Hexaware

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

How to Choose the Right data migration

This guide compares Hexaware, EY, Infosys, PwC, Accenture, Deloitte, IBM, Capgemini, Cognizant, and KPMG for enterprise data migration. The providers cover database, ERP, application, analytics, mainframe, and cloud estate transitions.

Hexaware ranks first through its Amaze® platform, which supports automated assessment, workload analysis, code conversion, migration orchestration, and validation. IBM differentiates its service portfolio with DataStage parallel ETL and Aspera FASP transfers for large files across high-latency networks.

What Enterprise Data Migration Includes

Data migration moves records, schemas, files, and application dependencies from source systems into target databases, cloud platforms, ERP environments, or analytics estates. The work includes source assessment, mapping, transformation, cleansing, reconciliation, and cutover control.

Hexaware combines automated readiness analysis with migration execution and validation across application and data environments. PwC connects data profiling and source-estate assessment with compliance controls, process redesign, and post-migration ownership.

Enterprise Data Migration Capabilities That Separate Providers

Migration scope determines whether a provider needs automated assessment, ERP expertise, high-throughput transfer, or regulated delivery controls. Hexaware, IBM, PwC, and the other ranked providers differ substantially in how these capabilities are packaged.

A useful comparison separates platform functions from consulting coverage. Amaze®, myNav, IBM DataStage, IBM Aspera FASP, and Infosys Cobalt provide identifiable mechanisms, while EY, PwC, Deloitte, Capgemini, Cognizant, and KPMG emphasize governed delivery through industry and regional teams.

  • Automated estate assessment and execution

    Hexaware combines Amaze® discovery, readiness analysis, code conversion, migration orchestration, and validation in one delivery model. Accenture connects myNav cloud assessment with workload grouping, migration sequencing, and landing-zone planning.

  • Target-platform and alliance coverage

    EY coordinates migration architecture across SAP, Oracle, Microsoft Azure, Salesforce, and legacy estates. Infosys Cobalt provides reusable execution patterns for AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud across cloud, ERP, and regional application environments.

  • Regulatory controls and operating-model ownership

    PwC links source-estate assessment to privacy, retention, compliance, process redesign, and post-migration ownership. KPMG connects SAP, Oracle, Microsoft, and cloud workstreams through Powered Enterprise for regulated ERP and finance programs.

  • Repeatable factory delivery

    Deloitte applies industry-specific playbooks and a migration factory to ERP, CRM, analytics, and regulated-sector programs. Capgemini Data Migration Factory supports repeatable delivery across SAP, enterprise applications, and cloud estates, including data cleansing and validation.

  • Large-file transfer and heterogeneous processing

    IBM DataStage runs parallel ETL jobs across heterogeneous enterprise sources, while IBM Aspera FASP transfers large files across high-latency networks. Cognizant pairs reusable Data Modernization Factory accelerators with engineering coverage for AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud targets.

Select the Migration Model Before Selecting the Provider

The provider choice changes with the migration model. Hexaware and Accenture center identifiable automation platforms, IBM combines transfer and processing products, and EY, PwC, Deloitte, Capgemini, Cognizant, and KPMG center consulting-led delivery.

A narrow database move and a multinational ERP transition require different controls. IBM suits programs with large-file and heterogeneous-source constraints, while KPMG, PwC, and EY suit programs that tie migration to compliance, operating-model decisions, and regional governance.

  • Choose platform-led automation or consulting-led governance

    Select Hexaware when automated discovery, workload analysis, code conversion, orchestration, and validation should anchor the program. Select PwC, EY, or KPMG when privacy, retention, regulatory controls, process redesign, or post-cutover ownership carries equal weight with data movement.

  • Match the provider to the source and target estate

    Select IBM for mainframe, heterogeneous enterprise sources, parallel DataStage processing, or large-file transfer through Aspera FASP. Select Infosys for reusable hyperscaler patterns across AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud, or Capgemini for SAP-centered application and ERP migration.

  • Set the required delivery geography and governance model

    Select EY, Infosys, Accenture, Deloitte, or Capgemini when regional teams must coordinate multinational application, ERP, or cloud estates. Require named decision owners because EY, Deloitte, Capgemini, and Accenture all identify client coordination or regional team composition as delivery factors.

  • Define validation and business ownership before execution

    Require Hexaware to specify how Amaze® validation will cover application and data environments. Require PwC or Capgemini to define how profiling, cleansing, validation, business-process dependencies, and post-migration ownership will be assigned.

  • Test the provider’s product transparency and extensibility

    Request concrete interfaces, automation assets, and handoff controls from Cognizant, KPMG, and Infosys because their public materials provide less product-level detail than dedicated migration software vendors. Compare those controls with IBM’s named products, Hexaware’s Amaze® capabilities, and Accenture’s myNav planning functions.

Enterprise Teams That Need Managed Data Migration Delivery

These providers serve programs where migration affects more than a single database. Their coverage spans ERP, CRM, analytics, mainframe, application, cloud, and regulated data estates.

Provider fit depends on the estate’s technical constraints and governance burden. Hexaware addresses broad application and data transformation through Amaze®, IBM addresses transfer and heterogeneous processing, and PwC, EY, Deloitte, Capgemini, Cognizant, and KPMG connect migration with industry delivery.

  • Large enterprises consolidating legacy databases, analytics platforms, and cloud estates

    Hexaware supports automated assessment, workload analysis, code conversion, orchestration, and validation across complex application and data environments. Accenture adds myNav workload grouping and target-environment planning for broad legacy estates.

  • Regulated organizations migrating ERP, finance, CRM, or customer data

    PwC connects migration scope to privacy, retention, compliance, process redesign, and ownership. EY and KPMG add alliance-led or Powered Enterprise delivery across SAP, Oracle, Microsoft, and cloud workstreams.

  • Multinational organizations coordinating regional application and cloud programs

    Infosys provides multilingual and multi-country delivery teams with AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud patterns. Deloitte and Accenture coordinate architecture, testing, governance, and migration-factory execution across regional teams.

  • Organizations moving mainframe data or large files across constrained networks

    IBM combines DataStage parallel processing with Aspera FASP transfers designed for large files across high-latency networks. IBM’s product portfolio also covers data replication and Cloud Pak for Data within broader enterprise architectures.

  • SAP-centered programs requiring cleansing and business-process coordination

    Capgemini combines SAP migration expertise with data cleansing, validation, and business-process dependency management. KPMG adds ERP operating-model coordination through Powered Enterprise.

Data Migration Selection Errors That Increase Delivery Risk

Enterprise migration failures often result from mismatched delivery models rather than missing destination platforms. A provider with broad cloud coverage may still require extensive client coordination, regional governance, or product-specific architecture work.

The provider cards expose concrete warning signs. IBM has a wider product-selection burden, Cognizant and KPMG provide less public detail on reusable migration APIs, and several consulting-led providers identify variation across regional teams or member firms.

  • Selecting a consulting factory for a narrow database move

    Deloitte, PwC, Capgemini, and KPMG can add industry, ERP, compliance, and operating-model work that exceeds a focused database migration. IBM or a narrowly scoped Hexaware engagement is more aligned when the requirement centers on heterogeneous processing, transfer, assessment, and validation.

  • Treating cloud coverage as proof of automation depth

    Cognizant lists AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud coverage but provides limited public detail on a standardized migration API surface. Hexaware identifies Amaze® functions for discovery, code conversion, orchestration, and validation, while Accenture identifies myNav functions for assessment and target-environment planning.

  • Ignoring transfer constraints for large or remote datasets

    IBM Aspera FASP addresses large-file movement across high-latency networks, while ordinary file-protocol assumptions may not address that constraint. IBM DataStage also matters when heterogeneous enterprise sources require parallel processing.

  • Underestimating client governance and regional delivery variation

    EY, Accenture, Deloitte, Capgemini, and KPMG identify substantial client coordination or variation across member firms, practices, and regional teams. The selection process should assign decision owners and require named delivery teams before migration waves begin.

How We Selected and Ranked These Providers

We evaluated Hexaware, EY, Infosys, PwC, Accenture, Deloitte, IBM, Capgemini, Cognizant, and KPMG across migration features, ease of delivery, and value. Features accounted for 40% of each provider’s score, while ease and value accounted for 30% each.

We compared named capabilities such as automated assessment, code conversion, migration factories, DataStage processing, Aspera FASP transfer, ERP coverage, and regulatory governance. Hexaware ranked first because Amaze® combines discovery, readiness analysis, workload and code conversion, migration orchestration, and validation with broad cloud, data, application, and production-support coverage.

Frequently Asked Questions About data migration

How should an enterprise choose among data migration providers?
Hexaware fits complex estates that span databases, warehouses, ERP systems, and cloud platforms through its Amaze platform and implementation teams. PwC fits programs that connect data movement with operating-model redesign, regulatory controls, and post-migration ownership.
When does a migration factory make sense?
A migration factory suits multinational programs with repeated workloads, multiple regions, and coordinated release waves. Accenture uses migration factories with myNav for cloud assessment and landing-zone planning, while Capgemini combines a Data Migration Factory with SAP, application, and cloud delivery workstreams.
What technical preparation is required before migration begins?
Teams usually need an inventory of source systems, data dependencies, target schemas, access permissions, and validation rules before extraction starts. Deloitte covers source-system assessment, schema mapping, integration dependencies, and release sequencing, while IBM supports relational, mainframe, cloud, and file-based sources through DataStage.
How do providers address security and compliance requirements?
Regulated programs require controlled access, data-quality checks, testing evidence, and governance across migration and cutover activities. EY coordinates profiling, transformation engineering, testing, governance, and cutover management across regulated industries, while KPMG connects data controls with ERP implementation and operating-model change.
Which providers support API-heavy migration programs?
Deloitte includes API architecture, governance, testing coordination, and post-migration support in programs covering ERP, CRM, analytics, and core banking estates. Cognizant supports API-based modernization, but API and automation depth depends on the selected cloud architecture and project team.
What commonly causes data migration failures?
Unresolved data quality issues, incomplete dependency analysis, incorrect mappings, and weak cutover controls can cause missing records or broken application workflows. PwC addresses profiling, schema mapping, reconciliation, and cutover planning, while Infosys coordinates extraction, transformation, validation, release, and post-migration operations.
Which service fits large-file transfers across difficult networks?
IBM fits migrations involving large files and high-latency networks because Aspera uses FASP transfer technology instead of ordinary file-protocol throughput. IBM also supports incremental database movement through InfoSphere Data Replication and CDC.
What is the tradeoff between consulting-led delivery and packaged migration tooling?
Consulting-led providers such as EY, Deloitte, and KPMG cover governance, operating-model changes, and cross-functional coordination, but smaller projects may receive more process than they require. IBM offers named products such as DataStage, Cloud Pak for Data, and Aspera, yet delivery still depends on specialist expertise and careful product selection.
How should migration onboarding and cutover planning be organized?
A practical sequence starts with source assessment, target design, transformation rules, test cycles, reconciliation, and a controlled production release. Infosys coordinates these stages through Cobalt patterns and delivery teams, while Capgemini organizes assessment, ETL design, cleansing, reconciliation, and cutover through managed workstreams.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

Logos provided by Logo.dev

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.