GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Data Science AnalyticsTop 10 Best Data Capture Services of 2026
Ranked top 10 data capture services for enterprises, covering Cognizant, Accenture, Deloitte, SunTec Data, Cogneesol, MaxBPO and key criteria.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
SunTec Data is the best pick for managed document extraction with predictable validated outputs, while Cogneesol fits teams that repeatedly process the same document families and can keep capture configurations accurate, and MaxBPO is a strong alternative when you need dependable operational handoffs with managed validation if budgetReviewId is null.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
SunTec Data
Exception-driven review loop that focuses validation effort on low-confidence fields instead of reprocessing everything.
Built for fits when production document extraction needs managed quality controls and predictable validated outputs..
Cogneesol
Editor pickException handling paired with confidence-based human validation routes only problematic pages for review.
Built for fits when document families recur and teams can maintain capture configuration for accuracy..
MaxBPO
Editor pickManaged exception handling with review-driven correction cycles to keep extracted fields within agreed accuracy thresholds.
Built for fits when document capture accuracy needs managed validation and dependable operational handoffs..
Comparison Table
SunTec Data
specialistData entry and data capture service provider for structured and unstructured documents.
Exception-driven review loop that focuses validation effort on low-confidence fields instead of reprocessing everything.
SunTec Data is a delivery-led capture service that supports end-to-end pipelines from document intake through exception handling and validated field extraction. Teams typically rely on it when accuracy gaps appear due to handwriting, inconsistent layouts, or mixed document types where automation alone creates too many rejects. The service fits programs that need repeatable throughput with operational controls, not only OCR output.
A key tradeoff is that SunTec Data is primarily a managed service, so internal teams spend more time on requirements, sampling, and acceptance criteria than on self-serve configuration. The strongest usage situation is a production capture program where an organization needs stable extraction quality and predictable error handling before integrating the results into business workflows.
- +Human-in-the-loop validation reduces risk from low-confidence fields
- +Exception handling routes ambiguous pages into review workflows
- +Document classification and separation support mixed-type intake
- +Structured output format supports faster downstream integration
- –Managed delivery limits hands-on configuration compared with self-serve tools
- –Strong outcomes require clear acceptance criteria and sample-driven tuning
- –More coordination is needed for multi-department document sources
- –Complex edge cases may require iterative cycles to stabilize
accounts receivable teams
Extract invoice fields from mixed scans
Fewer posting rejects
claims operations teams
Classify forms and separate supporting pages
Faster claim indexing
Show 2 more scenarios
revenue operations teams
Capture contract data from varied layouts
Cleaner CRM ingestion
Validates uncertain sections to reduce downstream contract workflow errors.
compliance teams
Extract evidence fields with traceable review outcomes
Improved audit readiness
Uses review routing to handle exceptions while maintaining consistent outputs.
Best for: Fits when production document extraction needs managed quality controls and predictable validated outputs.
Cogneesol
specialistBusiness process outsourcing firm offering data capture and document processing services.
Exception handling paired with confidence-based human validation routes only problematic pages for review.
Cogneesol fits organizations running batch and workflow-based capture where throughput, capture quality checks, and consistent extraction results matter. The service emphasizes configuration-driven capture rules, including key-value field extraction and structured output suitable for downstream processing. API availability supports integration patterns where documents are sent, extraction runs asynchronously, and results are polled or pushed to systems of record.
A key tradeoff is that advanced extraction accuracy depends on providing reliable templates or capture configuration for each document family. It is a stronger choice when exception handling paths are acceptable operationally and when human review capacity can be allocated for low-confidence cases. A common usage situation is accounts receivable or onboarding document capture where field-level errors must be contained before ERP or workflow updates.
- +API-first capture workflow supports asynchronous submit and results retrieval
- +Human-in-the-loop and exception handling reduce wrong-field downstream updates
- +Configuration-driven extraction improves consistency across recurring document types
- +Structured extraction outputs support ingestion into workflow and record systems
- –Accuracy on new document variations requires added capture configuration
- –Higher operational overhead when many pages fall into low-confidence cases
- –Table extraction quality can vary by document layout complexity
- –Batch tuning needs governance to prevent inconsistent rules across teams
revenue operations teams
Capture invoices into workflow records
Fewer posting corrections
accounts payable teams
Batch capture payment documents
Higher straight-through processing
Show 2 more scenarios
customer onboarding ops
Validate identity and form fields
Lower onboarding errors
Performs key-value extraction and flags unclear fields for human confirmation.
operations analytics teams
Convert scanned reports into data
Faster report availability
Turns captured fields into outputs that can be loaded into reporting workflows.
Best for: Fits when document families recur and teams can maintain capture configuration for accuracy.
MaxBPO
specialistBPO services provider specializing in data entry, data capture, and document conversion.
Managed exception handling with review-driven correction cycles to keep extracted fields within agreed accuracy thresholds.
MaxBPO is positioned for organizations that need operational control over capture output, not just model predictions. The delivery model emphasizes ongoing handling of capture quality issues through review, exception management, and rework loops. Engagements typically suit document-heavy operations where accuracy targets depend on both automated extraction and controlled validation.
A tradeoff is that outcomes depend on documented document intake patterns and managed review cycles, which can add lead time versus fully automated capture. A strong fit appears when invoice, KYC, claims, or back-office forms arrive in mixed formats and require consistent field mapping into existing systems.
- +Human-in-the-loop validation for low-confidence fields and exceptions
- +Operational capture workflow suited to mixed document types
- +Field mapping and controlled rework cycles to protect output quality
- +Delivery focus supports governance of capture outcomes
- –Automation depth may be limited by managed-review workflow
- –Throughput targets depend on intake consistency and staffing response
- –System integration work can require active client-side ownership
- –Model tuning iterations may be needed for new document variants
Accounts payable teams
Invoice capture across mixed formats
Fewer posting rejects
Compliance operations
KYC data capture from submissions
More complete compliance records
Show 2 more scenarios
Claims processing teams
Claim form and attachment extraction
Faster straight-through routing
Separates documents and extracts policy and loss details with exception review.
Insurance back offices
Certificate and endorsement capture
Cleaner downstream data
Performs full-page extraction and quality checks before sending structured updates.
Best for: Fits when document capture accuracy needs managed validation and dependable operational handoffs.
Invensis
specialistBPO provider offering data entry, data capture, and document conversion services.
Exception handling that routes low-confidence captures into targeted review tasks for field-level correction.
Invensis combines document capture delivery with automation-focused workflow integration for research-grade and operational document sets. Its core strength is end-to-end ingestion that handles scans and form-like documents, including preprocessing and extraction into structured outputs used by downstream systems.
Invensis also supports exception-driven review loops so low-confidence fields can be validated instead of silently passing through. Integration depth is a recurring theme, with APIs and capture-to-content and capture-to-workflow handoffs designed around predictable operational processing.
- +Human-in-the-loop validation for low-confidence fields reduces silent extraction failures
- +Preprocessing controls improve downstream extraction quality for noisy scans
- +API and workflow handoffs fit document-driven automation and routing
- +Exception handling supports operational throughput during batch capture runs
- –Automation depends on careful configuration to map extracted outputs to targets
- –Complex table extraction needs project-grade tuning and sample coverage
- –Handwriting and OMR performance depends heavily on document quality and constraints
- –Admin governance features can require implementation support for larger user groups
Best for: Fits when capture projects need controlled extraction, exception handling, and integration into workflow and content systems.
Flatworld Solutions
specialistOutsourcing company providing data entry, data capture, and document scanning services.
Exception handling with human review for specific low-confidence fields, integrated into the extraction workflow lifecycle.
Flatworld Solutions delivers managed automated data capture for documents, including capture-to-workflow and capture-to-enterprise integrations for downstream systems. The engagement model combines OCR and intelligent extraction with human-in-the-loop validation for low-confidence fields and exception handling.
Configuration support focuses on repeatable capture through templates, document separation, and field-level rules rather than only ad hoc extraction. Integration depth is oriented around operational handoffs into business processes instead of a capture-only output.
- +Human-in-the-loop validation for low-confidence fields reduces error propagation
- +Document separation and classification support batch processing across document types
- +Field-level extraction rules improve consistency on semi-structured forms
- +Capture handoff oriented toward workflow ingestion for operational processing
- –Heavier governance is needed to keep extraction rules aligned across document variants
- –API surface details are less transparent than vendors that publish granular endpoints
- –Template-driven capture can require ongoing adjustments when form layouts drift
- –Throughput and latency behavior depends on the managed delivery setup
Best for: Fits when enterprises need managed capture with validation and process handoff across multiple document types.
Outsource2India
specialistOffshore outsourcing marketplace offering dedicated data capture and data entry services.
Exception handling workflow that routes low-confidence extractions to human validation before final output export.
Outsource2India fits teams that need managed document-to-data capture without building OCR pipelines in-house. Delivery centers on scanning intake, extraction workflows, and human review loops to handle low-confidence fields and exceptions.
Engagements are oriented around repeatable templates and capture rules so the same document types can be processed consistently at batch throughput. Integration depth is focused on operational handoff to downstream systems rather than only returning a flat export file.
- +Human-in-the-loop validation for exceptions and low-confidence fields
- +Template-based capture rules for repeatable document types
- +Batch intake workflow designed for high-volume scan processing
- +Operational handoff workflows support downstream system ingestion
- –Less suited for fully template-free capture across highly varied layouts
- –Governance controls like RBAC and audit logs are not the primary focus
- –API surface and automation tooling are not described with deep technical specificity
- –Field-level extraction coverage depends on mapping rules per document type
Best for: Fits when organizations need managed capture delivery for known document formats and require exception handling for accuracy.
DataPlus Value
specialistData processing and data capture outsourcing company serving global clients.
Exception routing with review queues that isolate failed pages by rule outcome and field confidence.
DataPlus Value focuses on managed data capture workflows that convert scanned documents into structured outputs using configurable extraction steps. Its delivery emphasis centers on human-in-the-loop review for low-confidence fields and exception handling for capture failures.
The service-oriented model supports integration work for moving captured data into downstream systems like CRMs and back-office processes. Compared with DIY capture engines, governance and operational follow-through matter more than purely self-serve extraction configuration.
- +Human-in-the-loop validation for uncertain field extractions
- +Exception handling that routes failed pages into review queues
- +Managed integration support for moving captured data downstream
- +Batch capture workflows suited to recurring document sets
- –Less turnkey self-serve configuration for new capture types
- –Automation and routing depend on workflow design effort
- –API depth appears more implementation-led than product-led
- –Hand-offs can increase turnaround time versus fully automated capture
Best for: Fits when operations teams need managed capture and validation for recurring document workflows.
TechSpeed
specialistData services company providing data capture, data entry, and data enrichment.
API-first capture orchestration that delivers extracted results into custom workflows with batch-level run tracking.
TechSpeed focuses on automated data capture workflows that turn scanned documents into structured outputs for downstream systems. It is distinct for pairing capture with configurable extraction logic and an API-first delivery path that supports programmatic ingestion and routing.
Core capabilities include document ingestion, extraction of fields, and operational handling for misreads via validation-oriented flows. Governance support shows up in controlled project organization and audit-ready run tracking for capture batches.
- +API delivery supports programmatic capture-to-integration routing
- +Configurable extraction reduces custom development for common document sets
- +Batch processing fits high-volume document capture workflows
- +Operational run tracking helps troubleshoot failures per capture batch
- –Handwriting and low-quality scans require more tuning than typed forms
- –Advanced document classification depth depends on workflow configuration
- –Complex table-heavy layouts need added normalization steps downstream
- –Some governance controls are limited to the workspace layer
Best for: Fits when teams need API-driven capture automation with managed batch operations for recurring document types.
Tab Service Company
specialistDocument processing and data capture service provider with decades of operational experience.
Adjudication-driven exception routing that ties review outcomes to the capture run log for traceability.
Tab Service Company runs managed document capture workflows that route scans and images into structured fields for downstream systems. It focuses on high-volume batch ingestion, capture quality checks, and exception handling so teams can reduce manual rework.
The service is also built for enterprise integration via API-led handoffs and configurable workflow rules for different document types. Governance is supported through role-based access and operational audit trails for capture runs and adjudication outcomes.
- +Batch-oriented capture workflows that handle document volume predictably
- +Exception handling that routes low-confidence fields to review
- +Integration-first handoffs to downstream systems through an API surface
- +Operational audit trails tied to capture runs and review outcomes
- –Setup and document-type tuning require governance and ongoing change control
- –Workflow configuration complexity is higher than self-serve capture tools
- –Advanced extraction accuracy depends on well-prepared document sets
- –Admin workflows for governance can feel heavy for small capture teams
Best for: Fits when enterprises need managed capture operations, exception workflows, and controlled integrations.
Hi-Tech BPO
specialistData entry and data capture outsourcing provider serving diverse industry verticals.
Human-in-the-loop validation tied to exception handling for field-level quality before records are released.
Hi-Tech BPO delivers managed document and data capture workflows designed for outsourcing setups where scanning, extraction, and quality checks must run together. The service emphasizes intake handling across common file types and operational steps like document separation and validation of extracted fields before handoff.
Delivery quality typically hinges on process controls rather than product self-serve tools, with operational review cycles that keep capture outcomes consistent. Where automation needs exceed basic template extraction, the fit depends on how well the workflow can be specified and measured through ongoing exception handling.
- +Managed capture workflow reduces day-to-day operational burden on internal teams
- +Operational validation steps help catch extraction failures before downstream systems see bad fields
- +Supports batch-oriented intake patterns common in back-office capture operations
- +Document preparation and separation can reduce cross-page and mixed-batch errors
- –Integration depth and API surface depend on a defined handoff format and workflow design
- –Complex template-free or highly variable documents require sustained exception handling cycles
- –Admin governance controls like RBAC and audit tooling may be limited compared with software-native systems
- –Throughput depends on operational scheduling and queue management rather than self-tuned automation
Best for: Fits when back-office teams need outsourced capture operations with field validation and controlled handoff to enterprise systems.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 data science analytics, SunTec Data stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right data capture
Data capture services turn scanned or digital documents into structured fields using automated extraction plus exception handling with human-in-the-loop validation, and the enterprise requirements often hinge on integration depth and operational governance. This guide covers SunTec Data, Cogneesol, MaxBPO, Invensis, Flatworld Solutions, Outsource2India, DataPlus Value, TechSpeed, Tab Service Company, and Hi-Tech BPO across managed workflows for extracting consistent records.
The comparisons in the provider cards focus on how each service routes low-confidence fields into review, how it supports API and automation for capture-to-workflow handoff, and how admin controls reduce the risk of incorrect downstream updates. SunTec Data is highlighted for an exception-driven review loop that targets validation effort toward low-confidence fields instead of reprocessing everything end to end.
Data capture services: managed extraction, exception handling, and controlled field validation
Data capture is the production workflow that converts documents into validated data fields using automated capture steps and a structured path for exceptions that would otherwise become bad records. SunTec Data uses an exception-driven review loop that concentrates human validation on low-confidence fields and routes ambiguous pages into review workflows, which reduces reprocessing and supports predictable validated outputs.
Cogneesol pairs confidence-based human validation with exception handling so that only problematic pages require review, and its API-first workflow supports asynchronous submit and results retrieval for capture automation. Across the services, document separation and classification capabilities can support batch processing, while table extraction and noisy scan handling often depend on workflow configuration and the quality controls applied during validation.
Category criteria for data capture services in enterprise document workflows
Data capture reliability depends on how low-confidence fields and exception pages are routed into human-in-the-loop validation instead of flowing into downstream systems as-is. The strongest services concentrate review effort on the smallest set of problematic fields and keep batch outputs predictable for finance, operations, and compliance teams.
Exception-driven validation focus on low-confidence fields
SunTec Data centers validation effort on low-confidence fields through an exception-driven review loop and routes ambiguous pages into review workflows. Tab Service Company ties adjudication outcomes to the capture run log to keep exception handling traceable.
API and automation surfaces for capture-to-integration routing
Cogneesol uses an API-first capture workflow with asynchronous submit and results retrieval for programmatic automation. TechSpeed delivers API-first capture orchestration that pushes extracted results into custom workflows and supports batch-level run tracking.
Managed exception handling with review-driven correction cycles
MaxBPO runs managed exception handling with review-driven correction cycles so extracted fields stay within agreed accuracy thresholds. DataPlus Value isolates failed pages into review queues based on rule outcome and field confidence.
Preprocessing controls and field-level correction tasking
Invensis routes low-confidence captures into targeted review tasks for field-level correction and adds preprocessing controls to improve results on noisy scans. Flatworld Solutions combines human review for low-confidence fields with document separation and classification to support batch processing across document types.
Template strategy for repeatable document families
Outsource2India uses template-based capture rules to support repeatable document types with exception handling for accuracy. Hi-Tech BPO ties human-in-the-loop validation to exception handling so field-level quality is checked before records are released to enterprise systems.
How to choose a data capture service by validation workflow and integration control depth
The first decision should match the validation philosophy to the risk profile of the captured fields. A service that concentrates review effort on low-confidence fields reduces reprocessing, while batch-only exception handling can shift work to operational queues.
The second decision should match the integration shape to the internal workflow stack. API-first orchestration supports capture-to-workflow automation, while managed delivery can limit the amount of hands-on tuning across capture rules.
Map which data errors are most costly to the exception routing style
If wrong-field risk is concentrated in a small set of uncertain fields, prioritize SunTec Data because its exception-driven review loop targets low-confidence fields rather than reprocessing everything. If validation must be tied to each run for operational traceability, prioritize Tab Service Company because review outcomes connect to the capture run log.
Choose automation depth based on how results must be retrieved
If capture results must be polled asynchronously by downstream systems, choose Cogneesol because it supports asynchronous submit and results retrieval via API-first capture workflow. If custom workflow routing and batch run visibility are required, choose TechSpeed because it delivers API-first orchestration with batch-level run tracking.
Select managed review cycles when accuracy thresholds and handoffs drive operations
If delivery needs correction cycles that keep extracted fields within agreed accuracy thresholds, choose MaxBPO because it uses managed exception handling with review-driven correction cycles. If operations must isolate failed pages into rule-based review queues, choose DataPlus Value because it routes failed pages into review queues based on rule outcome and field confidence.
Decide between template-based repeatability and exception-heavy variability
If document families are stable and rule maintenance is acceptable, choose Outsource2India because template-based capture rules support repeatable layouts with exception handling. If documents are highly variable, choose a service that explicitly supports exception-driven validation at field level, such as Hi-Tech BPO.
Validate preprocessing and field mapping effort for noisy scans and complex tables
If scan quality is inconsistent, prioritize Invensis because preprocessing controls improve downstream extraction and exception handling routes low-confidence fields into targeted field-level correction tasks. If complex table extraction and tuning must be supported across document variants, evaluate how Flatworld Solutions handles document separation and classification and assess whether table extraction tuning fits the project sample coverage.
Confirm governance fit for managed delivery versus self-serve configuration
If the organization needs hands-on control to change capture rules often, prefer services with clearer API and workflow configuration emphasis, such as Cogneesol. If managed delivery is acceptable and acceptance criteria can be defined up front, SunTec Data fits because strong outcomes depend on clear acceptance criteria and sample-driven tuning.
Who should buy data capture services for enterprise document extraction
Data capture services fit teams that need validated extracted fields from scans or digital documents with controlled exception handling. The buyer requirement usually centers on preventing incorrect downstream updates and making review work auditable per capture run or per low-confidence field. The services in this guide vary in how they deliver automation and how much capture rule tuning they expect from internal teams.
Enterprises standardizing intake into downstream systems
SunTec Data and Tab Service Company align well when the organization wants predictable validated outputs with exception handling that prevents wrong-field propagation into enterprise systems.
Teams integrating capture into automated pipelines
Cogneesol and TechSpeed fit when results must be retrieved asynchronously or routed into custom workflows using API-first orchestration and batch tracking.
Operations groups managing recurring document families with controlled exceptions
MaxBPO and DataPlus Value fit when accuracy thresholds require managed review cycles and rule-based queueing of failed pages for human validation.
Organizations handling noisy scans and field-level correction work
Invensis and Flatworld Solutions fit when preprocessing controls and targeted review tasks are needed to reduce silent extraction failures from low-confidence fields.
Back-office teams outsourcing capture with field validation before release
Hi-Tech BPO fits when managed capture reduces day-to-day operational burden and field-level quality gates must exist before records reach enterprise systems.
Common data capture buying mistakes that cause rework and bad outputs
The most frequent failures come from mismatching exception handling and validation workload to the document risk profile. Another common issue is underestimating how capture rule tuning and preprocessing controls change extraction outcomes. Managed services can reduce operational burden, but they still require governance discipline around acceptance criteria, sample coverage, and workflow design.
Treating all documents as equal instead of routing only low-confidence fields into review
Avoid delivery designs that push every page through review queues. SunTec Data and Cogneesol both focus validation on low-confidence fields or problematic pages, which reduces reprocessing and limits wrong-field downstream updates.
Assuming API automation exists without aligning it to results retrieval and workflow timing
Do not plan synchronous extraction when the service workflow is designed for asynchronous submit and results retrieval. Cogneesol supports asynchronous submit and results retrieval, while TechSpeed supports API-first batch orchestration with batch run tracking.
Underfunding document-type tuning for new layouts and exception-heavy variability
Do not expect stable accuracy when document variations increase. Cogneesol requires added capture configuration for new document variations, and Outsource2India is less suited for fully template-free capture across highly varied layouts.
Skipping governance around acceptance criteria and change control for extraction rules
Do not launch without defined acceptance criteria and sample-driven tuning for low-confidence handling. SunTec Data depends on clear acceptance criteria, and Tab Service Company requires governance and ongoing change control to keep exception workflows aligned.
Overestimating table extraction performance without workflow tuning and sample coverage
Do not assume complex tables work without project-grade tuning. Invensis highlights that complex table extraction needs project-grade tuning and sample coverage, and Flatworld Solutions calls out heavier governance to keep extraction rules aligned across document variants.
How We Selected and Ranked These Providers
We evaluated each provider on how exception handling routes low-confidence fields into human-in-the-loop validation, and on the automation and API surface used for capture-to-workflow routing. Features accounted for 40% of the ranking, while ease and value each accounted for 30%.
SunTec Data stood out because its exception-driven review loop focuses validation effort on low-confidence fields and routes ambiguous pages into review workflows to produce predictable validated outputs. Cogneesol ranked highly for API-first capture workflow with asynchronous submit and results retrieval, and TechSpeed ranked highly for API-first orchestration with batch-level run tracking.
Frequently Asked Questions About data capture
Which providers prioritize API-first integration for automated data capture pipelines?
How do SunTec Data and MaxBPO handle exception handling when extracted fields fall below confidence thresholds?
When should batch capture programs choose Cogneesol versus Tab Service Company?
What breaks if a template-driven workflow lacks reliable capture configuration for each document family?
How do Flatworld Solutions and Outsource2India structure capture-to-workflow handoffs for downstream operations?
Where do admin controls and audit logging matter most for capture operations, and which providers address it?
Which services best fit scenarios that require human-in-the-loop validation for handwriting or inconsistent layouts?
How do data migration and schema alignment get handled when captured fields must map into existing systems of record?
Which onboarding approach works best for organizations that need controlled intake across mixed file types and must keep field validation before release?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
- Data Science AnalyticsTop 10 Best Intelligent Data Capture Services of 2026
- Data Science AnalyticsTop 10 Best Electronic Data Capture Services of 2026
- Data Science AnalyticsTop 10 Best Data Acquisition Services of 2026
- Data Science AnalyticsTop 10 Best Data Capture Software of 2026
- Data Science AnalyticsTop 10 Best Change Data Capture Software of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Data Science Analytics alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of data science analytics tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare data science analytics tools→