Commissioned Research
Top 10 Best Criminal Background Check Services of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE REVIEW

Public Safety & Crime

Top 10 Best Criminal Background Check Services of 2026

Editorial roundup comparing criminal background check services like First Advantage, HireRight, and BeenVerified to help businesses choose options.

20 min readUpdated Editorially scoped research
How we ranked these tools
01Editorial Scope

Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.

02Source Research

AI search agents find sources, extract figures with provenance, and aggregate written reviews. They also transcribe video reviews and podcasts.

Read our full methodology →

Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page. This does not influence our reviews. Editorial policy

Criminal background check services combine court and public records data models with consent-driven workflows to produce hiring and tenant-screening reports under policy controls. This comparison helps analysts, operators, and technical evaluators weigh automation and integration needs, coverage and jurisdiction depth, and audit log and RBAC requirements against consumer search experiences and corporate investigation expectations.

First Advantage is the best pick for enterprise HR teams that need jurisdiction-scoped criminal checks in repeatable, role-based workflows because it packages structured results built for governed employment decisions, whereas BeenVerified is a better fit for small teams needing a quick preliminary snapshot thanks to its person-centric report that consolidates identity context with public-record findings.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

First Advantage

Jurisdiction-scoped criminal results packaged for role-based employment decisioning across large, repeatable workflows.

Best for: Fits when enterprise HR teams need governed, repeatable criminal screening workflows at scale.

2

HireRight

Editor pick

Ongoing screening options extend oversight beyond pre-employment checks for workforce risk programs.

Best for: Fits when HR operations needs standardized criminal background check workflows across regions and roles.

3

BeenVerified

Editor pick

Subject-focused reporting that consolidates identity context and public-record findings into one reviewable view.

Best for: Fits when small teams need a quick criminal background check snapshot to guide next steps.

Comparison Table

1
First AdvantageBest overall
enterprise_vendor
9.4/10
Overall
2
enterprise_vendor
8.9/10
Overall
3
specialist
8.8/10
Overall
4
enterprise_vendor
8.5/10
Overall
5
specialist
8.3/10
Overall
6
7.7/10
Overall
7
enterprise_vendor
7.4/10
Overall
8
specialist
7.1/10
Overall
9
specialist
6.8/10
Overall
10
specialist
6.5/10
Overall
#1

First Advantage

enterprise_vendor

Background check and drug screening provider for global enterprises.

9.4/10
Overall
Features9.4/10
Ease of Use9.4/10
Value9.4/10
Standout feature

Jurisdiction-scoped criminal results packaged for role-based employment decisioning across large, repeatable workflows.

First Advantage’s criminal background check capability centers on jurisdiction-scoped searches that package findings in a consistent format for HR and risk teams. It also supports global workforce screening workflows that coordinate criminal record checks alongside other background screening components used in cross-border hiring.

A tradeoff for many teams is that effective use depends on tight intake data quality for search scoping and matching, especially when building repeatable workflows across large applicant volumes. It fits best when enterprise HR teams need consistent criminal background check execution and review across recruiting pipelines, contractors, and other authorized workforce populations.

Pros
  • +Jurisdiction-based criminal searches produce structured, review-ready results
  • +Global workforce screening supports governed cross-border hiring workflows
  • +High-volume ordering and report handling fits enterprise recruiting pipelines
  • +Workforce access screening supports repeatable reviews for authorized non-employees
Cons
  • –Search scoping and matching depend on consistent candidate identity data
  • –Configuration and workflow setup take more governance time than lightweight vendors
  • –Coverage depth can require careful mapping across roles and locations
  • –Dispute handling workflows add process overhead for HR teams
Use scenarios
  • HR and risk teams

    Employment criminal screening by jurisdiction

    Consistent employment decision support

  • Global HR and mobility

    Cross-border hiring criminal checks

    Controlled global screening execution

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Enterprise recruiting ops

    High-volume pre-employment screening

    More consistent review throughput

    Hiring pipelines standardize ordering and handling of criminal background check reports across applicants.

  • Vendor management

    Contractor access criminal screening

    Documented access-risk decisions

    Workforce risk teams apply repeatable criminal screening and review workflows to contractors and authorized workers.

Best for: Fits when enterprise HR teams need governed, repeatable criminal screening workflows at scale.

#2

HireRight

enterprise_vendor

Global employment background check and workforce screening provider.

8.9/10
Overall
Features8.9/10
Ease of Use8.9/10
Value8.9/10
Standout feature

Ongoing screening options extend oversight beyond pre-employment checks for workforce risk programs.

HireRight is a good match for multi-location employers that need repeatable applicant screening steps across business units, job roles, and jurisdictions. It supports consolidated hiring screening that can bundle criminal history search with employment-related verification elements for a single decision workflow. Administrators also gain governance leverage through configurable screening programs that keep case records consistent across candidates.

A key tradeoff is operational overhead when screening programs require tight configuration to map roles to the right jurisdiction and disclosable scope. HireRight is most useful when HR operations and compliance teams already have defined intake, consent handling, and adverse action notice steps so the background screening report output can be applied consistently.

Pros
  • +Consistent screening workflow support for multi-location hiring programs
  • +Consolidated view of criminal screening alongside other employment checks when permitted
  • +Ongoing monitoring options for post-hire workforce risk programs
  • +Standardized case documentation supports review and decision processes
Cons
  • –Role-to-jurisdiction configuration requires governance discipline to stay accurate
  • –Some workflow automation depends on disciplined administrative setup
  • –Jurisdiction coverage depth can vary by record type and location needs
  • –Investigation timing can affect turnarounds for high-volume hiring pushes
Use scenarios
  • HR operations and compliance teams

    Standardize criminal screening across regions

    More consistent screening steps

  • Talent acquisition and HR

    Combine criminal with employment checks

    Consolidated candidate verification

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Workforce risk and HR leadership

    Use monitoring after hiring

    Post-hire risk visibility

    Extend criminal background oversight with ongoing monitoring tied to workforce review processes.

  • Recruiters and HR teams

    Verify candidate history in one workflow

    Single screening workflow

    Combine criminal history outputs with other identity and history verification steps for candidate decisioning.

Best for: Fits when HR operations needs standardized criminal background check workflows across regions and roles.

#3

BeenVerified

specialist

Consumer background check and people search subscription service.

8.8/10
Overall
Features8.8/10
Ease of Use8.8/10
Value8.8/10
Standout feature

Subject-focused reporting that consolidates identity context and public-record findings into one reviewable view.

BeenVerified’s criminal background check outputs are structured around a subject profile that consolidates identity and available public-record context into one report view. That design fits property managers and small hiring teams that must triage candidates quickly before requesting deeper documentation. The platform’s workflow emphasizes rapid review over analyst-style evidence assembly, which can shorten time to first decision on non-urgent cases.

A key tradeoff is that the reporting experience is optimized for human review rather than automation and governance-heavy pipelines. It is a good fit for tenant pre-screening, caregiver applicant vetting, and vendor stakeholder due diligence where teams want a readable summary to inform interview questions and reference checks.

Pros
  • +Readable person-centric report format for fast preliminary review
  • +Strong name and identity context useful for background screening triage
  • +Practical for rental, caregiver, and stakeholder screening decisions
  • +Designed for discretionary workflows that feed into interviews and references
Cons
  • –Limited suitability for highly governed, evidence-pack background workflows
  • –Automation depth and API-driven provisioning are not its core strength
  • –Record matching quality can depend on consistent identity inputs
  • –May require extra steps to support formal disclosure workflows
Use scenarios
  • Small property managers

    Tenant applicant preliminary screening

    More informed tenant shortlisting

  • Small hiring teams

    Preliminary hiring screening

    Clearer next-step decision

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Households and family employers

    Caregiver screening for nannies

    Consolidated caregiver screening view

    Families consult the compiled identity and available records before scheduling interviews and references.

  • Small-business buyers

    Vendor and stakeholder verification

    Person-focused due-diligence context

    Buyers review public-record context for people tied to vendors and business relationships.

Best for: Fits when small teams need a quick criminal background check snapshot to guide next steps.

#4

Kroll

enterprise_vendor

Corporate investigations and risk consulting firm offering background checks.

8.5/10
Overall
Features8.5/10
Ease of Use8.5/10
Value8.5/10
Standout feature

Background screening outputs designed to feed governance workflows like adverse-action communication and remediation evidence.

Kroll is a criminal background check provider built for enterprise governance and legal defensibility. Its core work centers on structured background screening reports that support compliance workflows such as authorization handling and adverse-action communications under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

Pros
  • +Enterprise-grade documentation for defensible employment background decisions
  • +Strong fit for compliance workflows tied to adverse-action messaging
  • +Investigation support suited for counsel-facing IP due diligence work
  • +Governance orientation for structured risk remediation tracking
Cons
  • –Operational setup and policy alignment require dedicated admin ownership
  • –Less ideal for teams that want highly self-serve screening changes
Use scenarios
  • Enterprise risk and compliance

    Criminal background checks tied to remediation

    Traceable remediation ownership

  • Regulatory compliance leaders

    Criminal screening under FCRA obligations

    More controlled compliance process

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Corporate legal and counsel

    IP due diligence with record preservation

    Counsel-ready evidence package

    Supports ownership verification and chain-of-title review workflows that rely on structured findings.

  • Transaction and legal teams

    Criminal screening as escrow due diligence input

    Auditable handling of events

    Integrates screening evidence into governed escrow administration workflows and stakeholder reviews.

Best for: Fits when compliance and legal teams need defensible criminal screening outputs and controlled workflows.

#5

Checkr

specialist

API-first background check service for modern hiring workflows.

8.3/10
Overall
Features8.3/10
Ease of Use8.3/10
Value8.3/10
Standout feature

Ongoing workforce monitoring workflows that trigger alerts after an initial screening decision.

Checkr supports criminal background check workflows that fit high-volume and time-sensitive hiring, with results delivery geared toward automated intake and status tracking. The integration surface centers on provisioning screening orders for many candidates and piping results back into recruiting operations.

Pros
  • +Automates screening intake, progress updates, and outcomes across large applicant sets
  • +Connects criminal background checks with post-hire monitoring workflows
  • +Centralizes international onboarding checks into one operational process
  • +Allows drug testing requests to join broader screening activity
Cons
  • –Requires disciplined configuration to keep screening queues and disclosures consistent
  • –Dispute resolution processes may add operational steps for edge-case records
  • –Ongoing monitoring setups can require more internal ownership than one-time screening
  • –Coverage depth can vary by jurisdiction and record source
Use scenarios
  • Recruiting operations teams

    High-volume criminal background check throughput

    Less manual coordination

  • Global HR onboarding

    International criminal background screening coordination

    More centralized process

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Compliance and risk teams

    Add drug testing to screening

    Coordinated screening and testing

    Routes role-specific drug testing activity into the same operational flow as background screening.

  • Workforce risk programs

    Continuous reinvestigation workflows

    Less manual re-screening

    Runs post-hire monitoring workflows that send alerts after the initial criminal background decision.

Best for: Fits when recruiting operations need high-throughput criminal background checks with ongoing monitoring.

#6

Instant Checkmate

specialist

Public records background check service for consumers.

7.7/10
Overall
Features7.7/10
Ease of Use7.7/10
Value7.7/10
Standout feature

Report sharing that turns multiple search findings into a single document for review.

Instant Checkmate is a criminal background check service geared toward identity-driven searches that compile public-record findings into a readable report. It centers on report outputs for criminal history search and warrant status lookup workflows, including sharing a single summary of sourced results.

Pros
  • +Criminal history search results presented as a readable, report-style snapshot
  • +Warrant status lookup supports identity-based preliminary checks
  • +One-share report format helps small teams document findings quickly
  • +Simple input flow supports name and date-of-birth match behavior
Cons
  • –Limited fit for employment screening workflows that need formal governance controls
  • –Not designed for fingerprint-based search accuracy requirements
  • –Dispute resolution workflow depth is unclear for complex record mismatches
  • –Automation and API surface for integrations is not a primary focus
Use scenarios
  • Independent researchers

    Review criminal history search findings

    Consolidated criminal and court summary

  • Small investigation teams

    Run warrant status lookups

    Warrant status summary

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Consumers

    Do personal background research

    Consolidated personal context view

    A criminal background check report helps consolidate publicly available identity and record details.

  • Investigators and businesses

    Share documentation from searches

    Shareable written record

    Findings are compiled into a single readable report for follow-up and basic documentation.

Best for: Fits when individuals or small teams need preliminary criminal background check snapshots.

#7

Mintz Group

enterprise_vendor

Corporate investigations and pre-employment background check firm.

7.4/10
Overall
Features7.4/10
Ease of Use7.4/10
Value7.4/10
Standout feature

Litigation-ready investigative memoranda that translate record research into structured case support.

Mintz Group is a background research firm that differentiates through investigation workflows tied to identity resolution and documented findings. It supports criminal background check use cases that span cross-border research, sensitive executive hiring, and litigation fact development needs.

Pros
  • +Cross-border research supports multi-jurisdiction criminal background check narratives
  • +Structured documentation fits litigation fact development and record chronologies
  • +Sensitive hiring investigations address reputational questions beyond routine screening
  • +Human-led investigation approach supports context-rich background assessments
Cons
  • –Managed investigation workflow can add coordination overhead versus self-serve checks
  • –Limited visibility into automation and API surface for criminal history search
Use scenarios
  • Global compliance teams

    Cross-border criminal background check for hires

    Multi-jurisdiction background assessment

  • Executive recruiting teams

    Sensitive role background investigations

    Contextual background assessment

Show 2 more scenarios
  • In-house legal teams

    Litigation fact development with records

    Structured factual record

    Supports chronologies and investigative memoranda built from records research for disputes.

  • Corporate compliance investigators

    Case support using social account evidence

    Documented account activity

    Analyzes online accounts and preserved content as supporting material for investigations.

Best for: Fits when legal, compliance, or executive search teams need documented multi-jurisdiction findings.

#8

Intelius

specialist

People search and public records background check service.

7.1/10
Overall
Features7.1/10
Ease of Use7.0/10
Value7.2/10
Standout feature

Consolidated screening output blends criminal history leads with person context in one report view.

Intelius is a consumer-focused criminal background check service that packages court and public-record searches into a reviewable screening report. The service emphasizes identity-linked lookups and document-style output for individual candidates, household caregivers, and personal due diligence.

Pros
  • +Report format is easy to review for individual candidates and consumers.
  • +Includes identity-linked context that supports record matching during review.
  • +Supports household caregiver screening with a consolidated view.
  • +Turns search results into a structured narrative for non-technical users.
Cons
  • –Limited visibility into record provenance details compared with enterprise platforms.
  • –Background screening workflows are less automation-first for high-volume hiring.
  • –Dispute resolution guidance is less operationally specific for teams.
  • –Governance controls for HR administration are not clearly positioned for scale.
Use scenarios
  • Small HR teams

    Pre-employment criminal background check

    Reviewable screening information per candidate

  • Households and families

    Caregiver criminal background check

    Single caregiver review report

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Individuals

    Personal criminal due diligence

    Curated public-record leads

    Individuals organize court and related public-record leads before making a personal decision.

  • Consumers and small businesses

    Phone number to identity leads

    More context on unknown caller

    Users start with an unfamiliar phone number and review possible identity and address connections tied to records.

Best for: Fits when small teams or consumers need a readable criminal background check report.

#9

GoodHire

specialist

Background check service for small to midsize businesses.

6.8/10
Overall
Features6.8/10
Ease of Use6.8/10
Value6.8/10
Standout feature

Screening request handling is structured around HR review and repeat reinvestigation cycles.

GoodHire delivers criminal background check workflows that produce employment-ready screening records and support HR review. It is geared toward consistent pre-employment screening and repeat reinvestigation use for roles that require ongoing checks.

Pros
  • +Criminal check reports designed for HR review workflows
  • +Supports repeat reinvestigation processes for recurring screening needs
  • +Provides structured candidate authorization materials for screening requests
  • +Works well for recruiting teams coordinating screening and hiring status
Cons
  • –Jurisdiction depth can vary for county and state courthouse coverage
  • –Dispute resolution workflows can feel slower than high-automation peers
  • –Record matching relies on name and date-of-birth alignment
  • –Integration depth may require more coordination for ATS-driven automation
Use scenarios
  • Recruiters and HR teams

    Routine pre-employment criminal background checks

    Consistent screening records for review

  • HR compliance teams

    Scheduled periodic reinvestigation workflows

    Repeatable reinvestigation record handling

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Workplace safety and HR

    Centralized access to screening exceptions

    Central visibility into exceptions

    Safety teams manage random testing pools and track outcomes through a unified HR workflow.

  • Recruiting operations teams

    Integrated recruiting workflow coordination

    Less manual coordination between teams

    Recruiting teams connect screening request status with hiring systems to reduce duplicate entry.

Best for: Fits when HR needs repeatable criminal background checks for standard hiring pipelines.

#10

TruthFinder

specialist

Consumer background check service with dark web monitoring.

6.5/10
Overall
Features6.5/10
Ease of Use6.5/10
Value6.5/10
Standout feature

Reverse phone investigation ties an unknown phone number to identity-linked record research in the same reporting flow.

TruthFinder is used for criminal background check workflows that rely on identity-linked public-record research. It produces structured reports that can summarize available warrant and criminal-record findings with supporting identity context.

Pros
  • +Report format is readable for human review in manual screening
  • +Supports warrant and criminal-record research with identity context
  • +Reverse phone investigation adds context from an unfamiliar number
  • +Search results are structured enough for caregiver pre-interview triage
Cons
  • –Coverage varies by county and state, especially for older or sealed cases
  • –Dispute resolution requires direct user coordination rather than managed workflow
Use scenarios
  • Small HR and hiring teams

    Manual candidate criminal background check review

    Readable findings for human assessment

  • Families hiring caregivers

    Caregiver screening pre-interview triage

    Initial risk context for screening

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Independent investigators

    Warrant research and record context

    Lead material from public records

    Investigators can search for warrant and criminal-record references tied to identity context for leads.

  • Individuals with unknown numbers

    Reverse phone investigation for context

    More context about a caller

    Users can investigate an unfamiliar phone number to gather identity clues that inform further checks.

Best for: Fits when small teams need readable criminal background check reports for manual review.

Conclusion

After evaluating 10 criminal background check, First Advantage stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
First Advantage

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

Frequently Asked Questions About Criminal Background Check

Which services support high-volume criminal background checks with automation and integrations?
Checkr is built for high-throughput hiring workflows by provisioning screening orders and piping results back into recruiting operations. HireRight and GoodHire also fit larger hiring pipelines with repeatable ordering and structured report handling, which reduces manual tracking.
How do criminal background check services handle identity resolution before the criminal history search?
BeenVerified centers identity-linked reporting and compiles criminal history context into a single subject view, which helps reviewers connect results to a person. Intelius and TruthFinder also emphasize person context so record matching can start from identity details rather than only jurisdiction case listings.
When do jurisdiction-based searches matter versus national or multi-record approaches?
First Advantage packages searches around jurisdiction scoping so results align to role review workflows that require structured jurisdiction sourcing. Mintz Group focuses on jurisdiction-specific record gathering for evidence-backed, multi-jurisdiction findings, which helps when standard employment checks leave coverage gaps.
What data model choices affect audit controls and case handling for employment decisions?
Kroll is designed around compliance workflows with controlled documentation artifacts for adverse action communications under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. HireRight and First Advantage also support governed review and report handling patterns that fit HR decisioning, but Kroll is the most directly built to feed legal and compliance communication steps.
What breaks if record matching relies too heavily on name-only criteria?
Instant Checkmate and TruthFinder can produce readable summaries from identity-linked research, but name-based matching can still increase the risk of conflating similar names. GoodHire and HireRight rely on consistent request and review flows, so teams see fewer mismatches when candidate identity inputs and review steps are controlled.
How do continuous monitoring and reinvestigation workflows differ across providers?
Checkr supports ongoing post-hire monitoring that triggers alerts after an initial decision, which reduces the need to rerun screening manually. HireRight and GoodHire support repeat reinvestigation cycles for ongoing workforce screening, which changes the operational model from point-in-time checks to managed re-check workflows.
Which services fit small teams that need fast report sharing rather than enterprise governance?
Instant Checkmate is oriented to identity-driven snapshots and sharing a single summary document, which fits manual pre-employment review. Intelius and TruthFinder similarly deliver report-style outputs for individual-level review, but they provide less structured governance for multi-role case workflows than HireRight or First Advantage.
How do services support dispute resolution and keeping investigation context together?
Kroll’s compliance-oriented outputs connect screening decisions to remediation evidence that supports communications and internal review artifacts. GoodHire and HireRight structure case review around standardized workflows, which helps teams keep adjudication context consistent when disputes require re-review.
What onboarding and security controls should teams plan for when provisioning screening orders?
Checkr and HireRight require controlled order provisioning so results can be mapped back to the right candidate in recruiting systems without manual handoffs. Kroll and First Advantage fit organizations that need stronger governance patterns, including role-based access patterns and audit trail expectations around report access and decision steps.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

How to Choose the Right Criminal Background Check

What separates options for a criminal background check is how they handle source coverage and matching, not the screen itself. We focus on Report timeliness, Search coverage, and Match rules so the results you get are consistent with what you intended to check.

Report timeliness for requested jurisdictions

Why it matters

For a criminal background check, delays or missing jurisdiction results can change hiring decisions and create follow-up work. Timeliness matters most when you need specific locations and dates.

How to check

Ask for the expected turnaround when you request two or three jurisdictions in one run. Run a demo request and check whether the report shows completed vs pending jurisdictions and the dates covered.

Jurisdiction coverage depth

Why it matters

Search coverage depth determines whether the tool looks where cases actually exist for your scenarios. Coverage gaps are a common reason a check comes back incomplete.

How to check

In a demo, provide a sample person with known ties to multiple locations and ask which locations are searched and what record types are included. Request a coverage statement or list of included sources and compare it to the demo output.

Match rules and confidence signals

Why it matters

For a criminal background check, matching errors create false positives or missed records. Clear match rules reduce the chance that similar names get treated as the same person.

How to check

Ask the product to show how it links results to the person you entered, and what signals it uses when identifiers conflict. Look for fields that explain why results were attached or left unlinked.

Consent and disclosure workflow support

Why it matters

A criminal background check workflow needs the right steps around authorization and disclosures so decisions stay defensible. Tools that don’t support the process leave gaps in auditability.

How to check

During the demo, ask to generate a complete end-to-end case from request to report release, showing the disclosure/authorization artifacts that are produced. Confirm whether users can record version or template selection tied to the case.

Audit log for case actions

Why it matters

When reviewing a criminal background check, you need traceability for who changed inputs, requested new searches, or accessed results. An audit trail reduces disputes and helps internal governance.

How to check

In the admin view, check whether you can see a timestamped history of actions (request, edits, reruns, report access). Ask how long logs are retained and whether they’re exportable for internal review.

Dispute and correction handling path

Why it matters

If data is wrong, a criminal background check should support a clean way to challenge and correct it. A vague path often leads to reruns without a clear record of what changed.

How to check

Ask how the product captures the reason for a dispute and links corrections to the original case. In the demo, simulate a correction request and verify the updated report indicates what was changed and why.

Red flags

  • Report timeliness hides which jurisdictions are incomplete or pending
  • Match rules provide no explainable basis for linking results to the person
  • Audit logs don’t capture edits and reruns tied to a specific case

Fit by situation

  • If you regularly check multiple states in one request, prioritize report timeliness for requested jurisdictions.
  • If your applicants have complex location histories, prioritize jurisdiction coverage depth.
  • If reviewers often question identity hits, prioritize match rules and confidence signals.
Commissioned Research

Funding and competing interests

This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.

They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.

Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.