GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Digital Transformation In IndustryTop 10 Best Contractor Consulting Services of 2026
Ranked list of top contractor consulting services, with evaluation notes for contractors, including RSM US, CohnReznick, and Grant Thornton.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
RSM US is the best fit when regional contractors need broad finance transformation plus tax, risk, and transaction support, while Currie & Brown is a stronger alternative if you need staffed consulting that tackles cost, contract, and change impacts across delivery phases; for teams in the middle market with tighter coverage, CohnReznick is a solid entry point for complex programs and financial disputes.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
RSM US
Construction specialists paired with Microsoft Dynamics 365 implementation and transaction advisory.
Built for fits when regional contractors need finance transformation plus tax, risk, technology, or transaction advisory..
CohnReznick
Editor pickIntegrated construction advisory, forensic accounting, and tax support under one professional-services engagement.
Built for fits when owners or developers need integrated advisory support for complex construction programs and financial disputes..
Grant Thornton
Editor pickIntegrated construction advisory and forensic accounting for disputed costs, delay impacts, and contract damages.
Built for fits when contractors or owners need integrated capital-project controls and dispute support..
Comparison Table
RSM US
enterprise_vendorMiddle market advisory firm with construction contractor consulting services.
Construction specialists paired with Microsoft Dynamics 365 implementation and transaction advisory.
RSM US advises contractors across accounting, tax, risk, technology, and transaction work, with dedicated construction and real estate expertise. Teams can connect job-cost reporting, finance transformation, cybersecurity, and due diligence across related engagements. Microsoft Dynamics 365 implementation services add practical support for replacing spreadsheets and legacy systems.
The breadth helps regional contractors handling acquisitions, systems modernization, or control remediation across several business functions. Delivery remains consulting-led, so results depend on engagement scope, assigned specialists, and client access to operational data. RSM US fits contractors that need finance transformation alongside tax, risk, or transaction support during expansion.
- +Construction and real estate specialists cover finance, tax, risk, and technology needs.
- +Microsoft Dynamics 365 services support ERP modernization and integrated reporting.
- +Transaction advisory supports contractor acquisitions and post-deal integration.
- +Middle-market orientation suits regional firms without large internal advisory teams.
- –Consulting delivery requires significant client access to operational and financial data.
- –RSM US does not replace dedicated field-management software for daily site coordination.
- –Engagement quality depends on assembling the right specialists across service lines.
- –Broad advisory scope can create longer decision paths than focused construction consultancies.
Mid-market general contractors
ERP modernization and reporting
More consistent management reporting
Construction CFOs
Acquisition diligence and integration
Better acquisition decisions
Show 1 more scenario
Contractor executive teams
Cybersecurity and control assessment
Clearer control priorities
RSM assesses identity controls, incident readiness, and third-party risk across distributed project operations.
Best for: Fits when regional contractors need finance transformation plus tax, risk, technology, or transaction advisory.
CohnReznick
enterprise_vendorAdvisory and accounting firm with construction contractor consulting practice.
Integrated construction advisory, forensic accounting, and tax support under one professional-services engagement.
Owners and developers with complex capital programs can use CohnReznick for project oversight, cost analysis, procurement review, and financial diligence. Construction-industry specialization supports work involving real estate development, infrastructure, hospitality, healthcare, and multifamily assets. Forensic accounting and litigation support add evidence-based analysis to contractor disputes and financial claims.
The tradeoff is a consulting-led delivery model rather than a self-service project management system with native workflow automation. A developer managing a troubled construction program can use CohnReznick to reconcile project costs, assess schedule and contract exposure, and prepare financial support for negotiations or litigation.
- +Combines construction advisory, accounting, tax, and forensic analysis
- +Supports complex capital projects across several real estate sectors
- +Provides financial evidence for disputes, negotiations, and litigation
- +Offers lender, owner, developer, and contractor perspectives
- –Consulting engagements require substantial client coordination and document access
- –Less suitable for teams seeking a self-service project management application
- –Service depth depends on matching the engagement with appropriate specialists
Real estate developers
Troubled capital project review
Clearer recovery strategy
Construction lenders
Independent project cost assessment
Better lending controls
Show 1 more scenario
Contractor legal teams
Dispute financial analysis
Defensible claim analysis
Forensic specialists organize project records and quantify financial impacts for negotiations, arbitration, or litigation.
Best for: Fits when owners or developers need integrated advisory support for complex construction programs and financial disputes.
Grant Thornton
enterprise_vendorAdvisory firm with government contractor compliance and consulting services.
Integrated construction advisory and forensic accounting for disputed costs, delay impacts, and contract damages.
Grant Thornton brings accounting, tax, risk, and advisory specialists into engagements involving major construction programs and infrastructure assets. Its capabilities include cost and schedule assessment, procurement review, controls testing, project governance, financial modeling, and expert support for disputes. Forensic accounting adds detailed analysis of damages, cost allocation, and project records.
The tradeoff is limited emphasis on daily site supervision and field execution compared with specialist construction management firms. Grant Thornton fits owners or contractors facing a complex capital program, contested project costs, financing decisions, or weaknesses in commercial controls.
- +Forensic accounting supports detailed damages, delay, and cost-allocation analysis.
- +Construction advisory teams connect project controls with finance, tax, and risk expertise.
- +Transaction support helps assess infrastructure investments, acquisitions, and contractor financial exposure.
- +Dispute specialists can translate project records into defensible commercial analysis.
- –Engagements may provide less daily field presence than dedicated construction management consultants.
- –Broad advisory coverage can require coordination across several specialist teams.
- –Smaller contractors may receive less operational benefit from transaction-focused capabilities.
- –Recommendations depend on timely access to complete project and financial records.
Infrastructure program owners
Reviewing capital program performance
Clearer investment oversight
General contractors
Preparing complex dispute evidence
Stronger damages analysis
Show 2 more scenarios
Construction investors
Assessing contractor acquisition targets
Better acquisition decisions
Transaction and tax teams examine earnings quality, backlog, working capital, project exposure, and integration risks.
Project finance teams
Testing contractor financial controls
Improved financial visibility
Advisers review reporting processes, cost allocation, approval workflows, and control gaps affecting project performance.
Best for: Fits when contractors or owners need integrated capital-project controls and dispute support.
BDO USA
enterprise_vendorAccounting and consulting firm with government contractor advisory services.
Audit-style contract compliance review workflows that convert obligations into actionable tracking and stakeholder-ready documentation.
BDO USA operates as a contractor consulting firm with consulting delivery that often centers on finance, risk, and compliance workflows tied to capital projects. Engagement teams commonly support construction cost control, contract compliance, and project oversight processes that feed contractor and subcontractor negotiations.
BDO USA also tends to bring governance-oriented reporting and review discipline that helps standardize how issues are triaged and documented across project lifecycle stages. For buyers ranking top contractor consulting services, BDO USA is a strong option when compliance rigor and stakeholder-ready documentation matter alongside delivery support.
- +Strong governance discipline for compliance reporting and project oversight documentation
- +Depth in contract and risk review workflows that reduce downstream execution friction
- +Practical guidance for controlling cost variance and forecasting across project phases
- +Cross-functional teams that coordinate financial, operational, and compliance inputs
- –Less direct for tool-centric bid and estimating automation compared to specialized vendors
- –Delivery depends heavily on engagement staffing and document turnaround cycles
- –Workflow customization for construction-specific logs may require additional project design
- –Automation and API surface are not a native product offering for contractors
Best for: Fits when construction contractors need governance-heavy contract compliance and cost control support.
Crowe
enterprise_vendorPublic accounting and consulting firm with construction contractor advisory practice.
Method-led construction contract compliance and evidence-chain reviews that align financial documentation to governance and audit expectations.
Crowe delivers contractor-focused consulting through accounting, risk, and advisory delivery that maps to construction finance and compliance work. Engagements commonly cover construction contract compliance tasks like pay application review support and retainage and certified payroll workflow governance.
Crowe also provides controls and reporting assistance that connects project documentation to audit-ready evidence chains. The firm’s distinct angle is regulated-industry methodology plus contractor-specific review mechanics rather than providing a single purpose-built construction system.
- +Specialized construction finance and compliance support for contractor documentation workflows
- +Structured review approach improves consistency for pay application and compliance evidence sets
- +Strong risk and controls orientation for contract compliance and reporting governance
- +Broad advisory staff allows coverage across accounting, tax, and operational advisory needs
- –Less suited for teams needing an end-to-end construction administration software workflow
- –Automation and API integration surface is not a core delivery mechanism
- –Delivery depth can vary by engagement team composition and onsite schedule access
- –Requires active client document handoffs to maintain review cadence and traceability
Best for: Fits when contractor leadership needs compliance governance and review discipline across contract documentation.
Plante Moran
enterprise_vendorAccounting and advisory firm with construction contractor consulting practice.
Governance-focused compliance and workpaper documentation that supports contract adherence and closeout evidence.
Plante Moran targets contractor consulting work with delivery rooted in construction and regulated-industry environments, where advisory often needs audit-grade documentation. Core capabilities cover construction program and financial oversight such as estimating support, contract compliance, and construction closeout readiness.
Engagements commonly blend operational process design with stakeholder coordination across bid, award, execution, and claims lifecycles. Delivery typically emphasizes governance artifacts, including defensible workpaper trails and controls suitable for internal review and external scrutiny.
- +Construction and regulatory experience shapes compliance deliverables for contractor operations.
- +Strong documentation discipline supports contract compliance and closeout evidence needs.
- +Advisory approach fits complex programs with cross-functional governance requirements.
- +Works well when subcontractor coordination and schedule alignment must be controlled.
- –Consulting-led delivery limits hands-on automation and workflow tooling depth.
- –Change-order and claims workflows depend on client-provided inputs and process design.
- –Sandbox-style configuration and API-style extensibility are not the core engagement model.
Best for: Fits when contractors need compliance-first advisory and defensible documentation across bid, execution, and closeout.
Turner & Townsend
enterprise_vendorGlobal construction cost management and project performance consulting firm.
Risk and cost assurance methods built into project controls reviews, producing decision-ready variances and actions for leadership.
Turner & Townsend differentiates itself through construction and asset consulting depth tied to cost, risk, and program controls, which suits owners and contractors needing consistent governance. Core capabilities center on cost management, project and program controls, and commercial advisory work across planning, delivery, and reporting cycles.
Delivery quality is typically driven by experienced consultants who map project controls into executive-ready narratives rather than only producing spreadsheets. The service model fits contractor-side decision making where schedule realism, cost assurance, and contract administration coordination need tight alignment across stakeholders.
- +Project controls and cost assurance align reporting with decision governance
- +Risk-informed planning supports clearer change and cost impact tradeoffs
- +Consultant-led delivery fits complex stakeholder and contract environments
- +Consistent methodologies support repeatability across multi-site programs
- –Integration with existing project systems can depend on client-provided data access
- –Implementation timelines can feel heavy for short, low-complexity contractor projects
Best for: Fits when contractors need disciplined program controls, cost assurance, and risk governance across complex delivery portfolios.
CLA (CliftonLarsonAllen)
enterprise_vendorProfessional services firm with construction contractor advisory practice.
Control-oriented construction advisory that ties contract compliance outputs to accounting-backed governance artifacts for project teams.
CLA (CliftonLarsonAllen) brings construction contractor consulting rooted in audit, tax, and advisory delivery, which helps teams connect compliance work to operational decisions. Its construction advisory engagements commonly target job cost controls, contract compliance workflows, and management reporting for ongoing projects.
CLA also supports process design for document-heavy governance such as closeout packages and change order tracking, which reduces handoff gaps across project teams. For contractors that want delivery help plus control documentation rigor, CLA fits better than firms that focus only on implementation services.
- +Connects construction contract compliance to accounting controls and reporting decisions
- +Strong advisory pattern for job cost governance and management visibility
- +Document workflow rigor supports repeatable closeout and change order handling
- +Experience-informed guidance for certified payroll and prevailing wage documentation
- –Delivery is consulting-led, so automation depth depends on engagement scope
- –Requires client data readiness for construction schedules and cost baselines
- –Extensibility to tool-specific workflows may be slower than vendor-native integrations
- –Governance and audit artifacts can add overhead for small project teams
Best for: Fits when contractors need consulting-led control design for contract compliance and job cost governance across active projects.
Currie & Brown
specialistConstruction cost management and advisory firm serving contractors and owners.
Integrated cost and contract advisory that ties change impacts to risk and delivery decisions, not just separate reporting streams.
Currie & Brown delivers contractor consulting through project advisory, cost management, and construction risk support across design and delivery phases. The firm’s core work centers on quantity surveying, cost reporting, and contract advisory for complex stakeholder environments.
Engagements typically connect planning inputs to cost and risk decisions, which helps teams manage changes without losing schedule and budget alignment. Delivery is driven by staffed project teams rather than software-only workflows.
- +Staff-led advisory that covers cost, contract, and delivery planning together
- +Change-focused support that tracks impacts across budget, schedule, and risk decisions
- +Strong construction familiarity for contract compliance and site-facing coordination
- +Practical governance for review cadence on deliverables and decision gates
- –Requires active client participation to keep inputs current for reporting cycles
- –Workflow depth can vary by office and region staffing model
- –Limited evidence of a self-serve automation and API surface compared with software-led competitors
- –May add coordination overhead for teams already running internal cost and planning functions
Best for: Fits when a general contractor needs staffed consulting for cost, contract, and change impacts across delivery phases.
Baker Tilly
enterprise_vendorAdvisory and accounting firm serving construction contractors and government contractors.
Compliance-first contract interpretation support that produces documentation trails aligned to audit and wage-evidence expectations.
Baker Tilly is a contractor consulting firm that targets regulated, compliance-heavy work where accounting rigor and audit-ready documentation matter. Its core delivery centers on financial controls, contract compliance, and advisory support that maps to how general contractors and subcontractor teams manage reporting, claims, and risk.
The firm is a fit when construction leadership needs experienced advisors embedded into workstreams like change order support and contract interpretation rather than tool-led automation. Baker Tilly also supports governance needs around documentation trails that organizations use for prevailing wage and other project compliance evidence.
- +Construction-focused contract compliance advisory with audit-ready documentation emphasis
- +Experienced support for claims and dispute preparation workflows
- +Strong financial controls lens for cost reporting and governance alignment
- +Practical advisory that fits into contractor and subcontractor management processes
- –Consulting delivery model limits automation and API-driven integration depth
- –Implementation timelines depend on stakeholder availability and document readiness
- –Project-specific scope can require multiple workstreams to cover end-to-end needs
- –RBAC, audit log, and sandbox capabilities are not offered as productized software
Best for: Fits when a contractor needs compliance and contract-risk advisory alongside construction finance controls.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 digital transformation in industry, RSM US stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right contractor consulting
Contractor consulting supports general contractors and owners when construction execution needs contract governance, cost assurance, and documentation discipline rather than only software workflows. This buyer’s guide evaluates RSM US, CohnReznick, Grant Thornton, and the broader shortlist of BDO USA, Crowe, Plante Moran, Turner & Townsend, CLA, Currie & Brown, and Baker Tilly.
The provider cards emphasize how consulting engagements translate contract obligations into decision-ready tracking and evidence sets. They also show when delivery is built around finance transformation and advisory depth, as with RSM US and BDO USA, versus dispute-focused analysis and forensic accounting, as with CohnReznick and Grant Thornton.
Contractor consulting services that turn contract and project risk into governable execution control
Contractor consulting engagements apply accounting-backed review methods to construction program decisions, covering contract compliance, cost impacts, and risk governance across active projects. BDO USA and Crowe are positioned around contract compliance review workflows that produce actionable tracking and evidence-chain documentation that stakeholders can reuse.
RSM US and Turner & Townsend are positioned for projects that need controls plus decision support tied to finance and project controls reviews, including risk-informed variances and leadership-ready actions. CohnReznick and Grant Thornton further distinguish their delivery with integrated construction advisory and forensic accounting designed for disputed costs, delay impacts, and contract damages.
Consulting capabilities that convert contract obligations into execution control
Contract consulting earns its place when it turns contract terms into trackable control artifacts that project teams can use during estimating, procurement, change order handling, and closeout. This buyer’s guide evaluates whether each firm’s delivery model consistently produces governance outputs, not only advisory narratives.
Governance-heavy compliance workflows that produce reusable evidence sets
BDO USA and Crowe focus on contract compliance review workflows that convert obligations into actionable tracking and stakeholder-ready documentation. Their approach emphasizes review discipline that supports consistent pay application and compliance evidence chains.
Integrated construction advisory tied to forensic accounting for disputed costs
CohnReznick and Grant Thornton combine construction advisory with forensic accounting to support damages, delay impacts, and cost-allocation analysis. This pairing is designed for complex capital projects where the decision problem is dispute-driven rather than purely operational.
Project controls and risk-informed cost assurance for leadership decision-making
Turner & Townsend and RSM US deliver decision-ready variances by embedding risk and cost assurance methods into project controls reviews. RSM US adds transaction advisory and Microsoft Dynamics 365 implementation support when finance transformation affects reporting governance.
Consulting documentation discipline across bid, execution, and closeout
Plante Moran and Baker Tilly emphasize compliance-first documentation and workpapers that support defensible contract adherence and closeout evidence. Plante Moran centers documentation across bid, execution, and closeout while Baker Tilly concentrates on contract interpretation support aligned to audit and wage-evidence expectations.
Decision framework for matching contract governance needs to a consulting delivery model
Shortlisted contractor consulting firms differ most in delivery orientation, since some engagements build governance evidence chains while others prioritize integrated finance and project controls decision support. The selection process works best when the evaluation criteria start with the operational bottleneck the contractor cannot solve internally, then match firm capabilities to that bottleneck.
Select engagement type based on whether the core problem is compliance governance or dispute economics
If the primary issue is converting contract obligations into stakeholder-ready documentation, BDO USA and Crowe provide audit-style contract compliance review workflows and evidence-chain reviews. If the primary issue is disputed costs, delay impacts, and contract damages, CohnReznick and Grant Thornton combine construction advisory with forensic accounting to produce damages-ready cost analysis.
Decide whether the engagement must connect project controls to finance transformation
If leadership needs cost assurance tied to reporting governance and finance systems modernization, RSM US pairs construction specialists with Microsoft Dynamics 365 implementation and transaction advisory. If the need is program-level project controls and risk governance without an explicit finance transformation scope, Turner & Townsend centers on project controls reviews and risk-informed planning.
Assess how much client data access the engagement requires for recurring control cycles
Engagements that depend on frequent operational and financial inputs need strong document access and stakeholder availability, which CohnReznick and Grant Thornton flag as central to delivery. Where the contractor cannot supply consistent inputs, firms like RSM US and CLA still require data readiness, but their advisory pattern is shaped to connect controls outputs to accounting-backed governance artifacts.
Choose a documentation-forward partner when defensibility across closeout is the risk
When the contractor needs compliance-first workpaper documentation across bid, execution, and closeout, Plante Moran’s governance focus is designed to support contract adherence and closeout evidence. When defensibility centers on audit and wage-evidence expectations with contract interpretation support, Baker Tilly produces documentation trails aligned to compliance evidence needs.
Verify that the engagement model fits active delivery cadence rather than only periodic reviews
If the contractor needs frequent, hands-on guidance across active project execution, Turner & Townsend and RSM US are built around project controls and decision-ready variances. If the engagement will be scoped as periodic review and evidence assembly, BDO USA and Crowe align better to governance-heavy compliance documentation deliverables.
Who contractor consulting engagements fit best and why
Contractor consulting services fit teams that must translate contract language and project performance into governance artifacts that finance, legal, and construction leadership can use together. These services also fit firms that need a repeatable evidence chain for pay application support, compliance reporting, and closeout defensibility.
Regional general contractors needing finance modernization plus contract-advisory support
RSM US pairs construction specialists with Microsoft Dynamics 365 implementation and transaction advisory, which suits contractors that need governance reporting to improve finance transformation while managing contract risk and documentation discipline.
Owners and developers managing complex construction programs with ongoing disputes
CohnReznick and Grant Thornton combine construction advisory with forensic accounting, which matches owner-led needs for disputed costs, delay impacts, and damages analysis across real estate sectors.
Contractors with governance-heavy compliance reporting and evidence chain requirements
BDO USA and Crowe focus on contract compliance review workflows and evidence-chain reviews that convert obligations into tracking and stakeholder-ready documentation.
Contractors that prioritize defensible workpapers spanning bid through closeout
Plante Moran and Baker Tilly emphasize compliance-first documentation discipline, with Plante Moran supporting closeout evidence and Baker Tilly emphasizing audit and wage-evidence aligned contract interpretation trails.
Teams that need risk-informed cost assurance inside project controls
Turner & Townsend and RSM US align cost assurance with project controls reviews, producing leadership-ready variances and risk-informed actions for complex portfolios.
Common pitfalls when buying contractor consulting services
The most frequent buying failure comes from expecting a consulting engagement to behave like software implementation or field management tooling. The second failure comes from scoping the wrong delivery orientation to the wrong risk center.
Treating a consulting engagement as a substitute for daily site coordination and field management software
RSM US explicitly does not replace dedicated field-management software for daily site coordination, so contractor teams should separate governance advisory deliverables from operational execution tooling needs.
Scoping compliance documentation work without allocating enough document access and coordination time
CohnReznick and Grant Thornton flag that engagements require substantial client coordination and document access, so internal teams must be staffed for recurring requests rather than relying on ad hoc approvals.
Assuming every firm will provide strong automation and API-driven workflow depth
Crowe, Plante Moran, and Baker Tilly position delivery as compliance and evidence-chain reviews, so contractors should not treat API integration depth as a core delivery mechanism and should plan governance inputs and manual workflows accordingly.
Underestimating how integration with existing project systems depends on client data access
Turner & Townsend notes that integration with existing project systems can depend on client-provided data access, so contractors should validate reporting feeds and data availability before committing to implementation timelines.
How We Selected and Ranked These Providers
We evaluated contractor consulting providers on features, ease, and value using the submitted provider cards as the scoring basis. Features account for 40% of the ranking, ease accounts for 30%, and value accounts for the remaining 30%.
RSM US ranked highest because it pairs construction specialists with Microsoft Dynamics 365 implementation and transaction advisory, and its card lists strong coverage across finance transformation plus tax, risk, and technology needs. CohnReznick and Grant Thornton followed due to integrated construction advisory combined with forensic accounting, while BDO USA and Crowe ranked higher than more generic compliance-focused options because they convert contract obligations into tracking and evidence-chain documentation that stakeholders can reuse.
Frequently Asked Questions About contractor consulting
How do RSM US and Deloitte differ in handling ERP modernization alongside contractor finance controls?
Which firm handles disputed costs analysis with forensic accounting workflows for construction claims?
When should a contractor prioritize contract compliance evidence chains over general advisory deliverables?
How do Crowe and CLA approach pay application review and retainage or certified payroll governance?
What should contractors expect for integration support and API-driven automation when selecting consulting partners?
How do service providers manage access controls and security during advisory work that touches sensitive contract and payroll data?
When does data migration matter in contractor consulting engagements, and which providers explicitly support migration-heavy transformations?
What breaks if a contractor lacks strong admin controls and configuration governance during construction program oversight?
Which providers offer extensibility for contractor workflows such as change order tracking and closeout documentation beyond one-time consulting?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
- Digital Transformation In IndustryTop 10 Best Contract Consulting Services of 2026
- Technology Digital MediaTop 10 Best Contractor Website Services of 2026
- Digital Transformation In IndustryTop 10 Best High Tech Consulting Services of 2026
- HR In IndustryTop 10 Best Contractor Onboarding Software of 2026
- Technology Digital MediaTop 10 Best IT Consulting Software of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Digital Transformation In Industry alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of digital transformation in industry tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare digital transformation in industry tools→