GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Business FinanceTop 10 Best Brand Licensing Services of 2026
Top 10 brand licensing services ranked for 2026, comparing LMCA, CAA Brand Management, Bluestar Alliance, using Brand Licensing Europe and Licensing Expo.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
LMCA is the best fit for teams that want managed licensing administration with approvals, documentation, and compliance handled end to end, whereas Bluestar Alliance is the better alternative when you need standardized approval execution across multiple licensees and categories.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
LMCA
Managed product and artwork approval workflow that enforces consistent brand standards across licensees and categories.
Built for fits when licensors need managed licensing administration across approvals, documentation, and compliance handling..
CAA Brand Management
Editor pickLicensing operations model that ties approvals and ongoing program administration to agreement-driven governance.
Built for fits when brand licensors need governed licensing operations across many licensees..
Bluestar Alliance
Editor pickApproval workflow coordination with submission tracking across artwork and sample review cycles.
Built for fits when licensors need standardized approval execution across multiple licensees and categories..
Comparison Table
LMCA
agencyLMCA provides licensing representation, brand extension, and intellectual property commercialization services.
Managed product and artwork approval workflow that enforces consistent brand standards across licensees and categories.
LMCA’s core work centers on managing the moving parts of a licensing program, including agreement and relationship administration for licensors and licensees. The provider’s operational footprint typically includes approved product and artwork governance, review cycles, and structured documentation flows that support consistent brand standards application across categories. Execution quality is most visible in how approvals, compliance checks, and reporting steps stay coordinated when multiple licensees and product lines are active.
A key tradeoff is that licensing program outcomes still depend on licensors supplying timely brand standards, style guidance, and product inputs for review cycles. LMCA fits best when a licensing team needs managed program operations that reduce back-and-forth on approvals, documentation, and licensee deliverables during active launches.
- +Structured licensing administration for approvals, documentation, and launch coordination
- +Clear operating model for product governance across multiple licensees
- +Practical support for brand standards execution with review handoffs
- +Program documentation flows that reduce missed deliverables
- –High throughput depends on licensor responsiveness to review inputs
- –Limited visibility for teams that require deep custom workflow automation
Brand licensing teams
Coordinating approvals across active licensees
Fewer approval delays
Licensors with multiple categories
Maintaining approved product governance
More consistent product quality
Show 1 more scenario
Legal and operations stakeholders
Handling agreement administration steps
Cleaner operational handoffs
Supports agreement execution and administrative coordination that keeps licensing operations moving.
Best for: Fits when licensors need managed licensing administration across approvals, documentation, and compliance handling.
CAA Brand Management
agencyCAA Brand Management represents entertainment, sports, and consumer brands in licensing and brand extension.
Licensing operations model that ties approvals and ongoing program administration to agreement-driven governance.
CAA Brand Management is suited for licensing programs that require repeatable review cycles for artwork, product samples, and compliance checks across territories and channels. Licensing operations are organized around defined brand standards, with a clear handoff between licensors, licensees, and internal reviewers. Automation and integration depth matter most when reporting and approvals must align with program records. In practice, the service works best when licensors can provide timely brand standards and product submissions that move through a controlled review pipeline.
A key tradeoff is that governance-led workflows can slow execution when licensees submit incomplete artwork or when brand standards are not operationalized into actionable guidance. It fits licensors running multi-category licensing programs who need consistent quality assurance checks and structured reporting rhythms tied to agreement terms. Teams that need fast, lightweight approvals with minimal review checkpoints may find the process heavier than purely self-serve portals.
- +Approval workflows that connect brand standards to licensee submissions
- +Program administration designed for multi-category licensing operations
- +Operational support for ongoing royalty and reporting processes
- +Governance-first handling that reduces off-standards product risk
- –Review cycles depend on complete submissions from licensees
- –Workflow rigidity can add lead time for low-risk product changes
- –Integration depth may be limited for fully custom enterprise systems
- –Admin effort increases when brand standards are not specific
Brand licensing teams
Standardize product approvals at scale
Fewer off-standards releases
Licensing program managers
Run ongoing contract-linked reporting
Cleaner royalty documentation
Show 1 more scenario
Brand owners with multiple categories
Maintain standards across product lines
More consistent brand presentation
Program governance aligns reviewers on quality expectations and brand standards per category.
Best for: Fits when brand licensors need governed licensing operations across many licensees.
Bluestar Alliance
enterprise_vendorBluestar Alliance develops and manages consumer brands through licensing, partnerships, and distribution.
Approval workflow coordination with submission tracking across artwork and sample review cycles.
Bluestar Alliance is structured around the licensing workflow that licensor and licensing agent teams run between brand standards and sellable product output. Its core strength is coordinating approval cycles and program administration steps that typically involve multiple stakeholders like brand owners, licensees, and internal review teams. The offering fits licensors that need repeatable controls for creative assets, sample evaluations, and agreement-driven production checkpoints.
A key tradeoff is that governance depth depends on how the program is configured and how review responsibilities are mapped to stakeholders. Bluestar Alliance is a strong fit when licensing teams must standardize artwork and product approval routing across several licensees while keeping audit-ready records of decisions.
- +Workflow-driven approval routing for artwork and sample submissions
- +Program administration structure built for multi-licensee coordination
- +Centralized decision records that support compliance and review continuity
- +Operational focus that reduces handoff gaps between stakeholders
- –Integration needs are handled through implementation rather than self-serve setup
- –Governance mapping work is required to match internal review responsibilities
- –Feature coverage is more licensing-workflow focused than broad enterprise procurement
- –Reporting depth depends on how licensing artifacts are organized
Licensing operations teams
Standardize approval routing across licensees
Fewer missed approvals
Brand compliance leads
Control creative and product checks
More consistent compliance
Show 2 more scenarios
Licensing agents
Coordinate multi-stakeholder licensing reviews
Faster review cycles
Agents manage partner communications and internal reviewer feedback inside a single operational workflow.
Program managers
Run repeatable category execution
Better program consistency
Managers replicate licensing approval processes across product categories while keeping execution history accessible.
Best for: Fits when licensors need standardized approval execution across multiple licensees and categories.
Iconix International
enterprise_vendorIconix International manages consumer brand intellectual property through licensing and strategic partnerships.
Category execution model that connects licensee workflows to ongoing creative approvals and brand standards application.
Iconix International operates as a brand licensing company with program administration and execution grounded in real product workflows across consumer categories.
The company’s day-to-day handling centers on creative and compliance touchpoints that support artwork approval and sample approval before product launch.
Licensing governance is exercised through brand standards expectations, which reduces drift between approved concepts and production outputs.
- +Operational brand-extension execution across multiple consumer categories
- +Structured artwork approval and sample review workflow for compliant product launches
- +Established licensing governance tied to brand standards manual expectations
- +Practical licensee relationship management for contract lifecycle follow-through
- –Limited transparency into an external API surface for licensee and royalty integrations
- –Strong process focus can add coordination overhead for complex, multi-territory approvals
Best for: Fits when licensors need end-to-end licensing program operations tied to creative approval and brand standards enforcement.
Global Icons
agencyGlobal Icons manages brand licensing, intellectual property development, and international representation.
Centralized brand standards enforcement through artwork and sample approval coordination across licensee product releases.
Global Icons delivers brand licensing program support for trademark owners that want to grant licensees product category rights with defined brand standards. The service focuses on managing artwork and sample approval workflows, enforcing consistency through brand guidelines, and coordinating the contract lifecycle from intake through royalty report handling.
Global Icons also supports compliance needs that come with controlled releases, such as quality assurance checks and product safety documentation coordination. The value shows up most when governance and review throughput matter across multiple licensees in the same brand portfolio.
- +Artwork and sample approval workflow designed for controlled brand releases
- +Brand standards documentation supports consistent product execution across licensees
- +Licensing operations coverage includes contract lifecycle coordination tasks
- +Quality assurance and compliance documentation workflows reduce release risk
- –Limited published automation detail for royalty tracking and royalty report pipelines
- –Governance requires sustained review coordination to keep approvals on schedule
Best for: Fits when licensors need hands-on licensing administration, approval management, and compliance coordination for multiple licensees.
WHP Global
enterprise_vendorWHP Global builds and manages consumer brand platforms through licensing and strategic commercial partnerships.
Managed approvals workflow that coordinates artwork and product sign-off against brand standards across licensees and categories.
WHP Global focuses on brand licensing program operations for licensors who need consistent administration across product categories, channels, and territories. The service model emphasizes licensing agreement management workflows like approvals, vendor coordination, and ongoing licensee oversight rather than just a self-serve portal. WHP Global also supports commercial stewardship activities such as royalty reporting processes, sell-in visibility, and brand standards enforcement during the lifecycle of approved product launches.
- +Program-level administration supports multi-category licensing with consistent brand standards
- +Operational workflow coverage for approvals reduces dependency on ad hoc internal processes
- +Ongoing licensee oversight fits royalty reporting cadence and launch governance needs
- +Cross-functional coordination helps keep product release timelines aligned with licensing obligations
- –Admin workflows depend on service delivery, which can limit self-service automation
- –Customization depth for bespoke approval gates may require governance-led engagement
- –API-first integration surface is not a clear focus compared with licensing-native workflow tools
- –Attribution of operational changes to specific data fields can be harder without tight internal mapping
Best for: Fits when licensors need managed licensing administration with strong brand standards enforcement across categories and territories.
Authentic Brands Group
enterprise_vendorAuthentic Brands Group manages a portfolio of consumer brands through licensing, marketing, and operational partnerships.
Centralized brand standards and partner approvals coordinated by the licensing organization, not by a self-serve portal.
Authentic Brands Group runs brand licensing programs across retail, consumer products, and media, with internal licensing leadership that coordinates brand strategy and partner operations. Its core capability centers on managing licensor relationships, contract lifecycle execution, and partner approvals from product concept through artwork and quality checks.
The operational footprint is stronger on program management and brand protection than on self-serve partner software. Licensing teams get structured coordination support for approvals, compliance expectations, and downstream reporting processes tied to each licensing agreement.
- +Program management depth across multi-category licensing agreements
- +Centralized brand standards enforcement through approvals and QA coordination
- +Clear contract operations cadence for partner onboarding and renewals
- +Brand protection posture designed for trademark and product compliance
- –Partner tooling is less self-serve than automation-first licensing platforms
- –Workflow visibility depends more on managed coordination than on live portals
- –Approval timelines can vary by category and partner readiness
- –Extensibility for custom automation and reporting is limited
Best for: Fits when a brand owner needs hands-on licensing program governance across multiple categories and channels.
Joester Loria Group
agencyJoester Loria Group represents brands and properties through licensing, merchandising, and marketing programs.
Hands-on management of the approvals workflow from submissions through sample review and governance follow-ups.
Joester Loria Group is a brand licensing services provider that supports licensors and licensees through agreement-facing execution and program operations. The offering emphasizes practical licensing workflows like submissions review, sample approval handling, and ongoing compliance attention across product categories and territories.
The engagement pattern typically centers on managing the moving parts between brand standards, approved production inputs, and sales reporting expectations. This focus makes it most relevant for licensing teams that need day-to-day coordination rather than only contract drafting.
- +Operational support for submissions and sample approvals reduces brand standard drift.
- +Agreement execution support supports smoother handoffs between licensors and licensees.
- +Cross-category coordination helps keep artwork, production, and compliance aligned.
- +Ongoing attention to governance inputs supports fewer last-minute remediation loops.
- –Limited public detail on API surface and automation tooling for system integration.
- –Reporting coverage described at a workflow level, not as a configurable data pipeline.
- –Governance artifacts appear engagement-driven, with fewer self-serve controls highlighted.
- –Requires internal licensing owners to supply inputs for approvals and approvals queues.
Best for: Fits when licensing teams need hands-on approval and governance support across multiple licensees.
Bravado
agencyBravado manages entertainment merchandise, licensing, and consumer product programs for artists and properties.
Managed licensing-operations delivery that connects partner management with artwork approval and ongoing royalty reporting.
Bravado operates as a brand licensing agent that helps brands run end-to-end licensing programs from partner recruitment to product category execution. Its core service coverage includes managing licensing agreements across territories and channels, coordinating artwork and sample approvals, and supporting royalty report collection and reconciliation. Bravado also takes on operational work that keeps licensees aligned with brand standards through style guidance and quality assurance workflows.
- +Program operations cover partner onboarding through approved product execution
- +Artwork and sample approval workflows reduce brand-standards drift
- +Royalty report coordination supports smoother royalty tracking and reconciliation
- +Multi-category execution works across channels and territory structures
- –Workflow depth depends on agreed licensing governance and team resourcing
- –Automation and API tooling are not a core public emphasis versus managed services
Best for: Fits when a brand licensing program needs managed execution across multiple product categories and markets.
WildBrain CPLG
agencyWildBrain CPLG manages global licensing and merchandising programs for entertainment and consumer brands.
End-to-end coordination of licensing approvals and royalty reporting steps as a managed operating workflow.
WildBrain CPLG supports brand licensing programs that need contract-ready workflows across approvals, rights governance, and royalty reporting operations. It is distinct for how licensing execution is packaged around licensing life cycle touchpoints that brand teams and licensing managers can route through standardized steps.
Core capabilities focus on licensee onboarding, agreement and documentation handling, artwork and product review coordination, and royalty statement workflows tied to sales reporting. The service also supports compliance-oriented review loops for product and brand standards before distribution goes live.
- +Workflow coverage across approval, documentation, and ongoing reporting stages
- +Licensing program operations tailored to repeatable brand standards review
- +Clear handoffs between licensing managers and product review checkpoints
- +Royalty operations structured around statement and sales reporting cycles
- –Limited evidence of deep self-serve configuration without service-led setup
- –Automation depth depends on agreed workflows rather than fully generic rule engines
- –Integration breadth is not shown for complex ERP or PLM event streams
- –Approval throughput can bottleneck when reviews require many stakeholders
Best for: Fits when licensing teams need service-led workflow execution across approvals and royalty reporting.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 business finance, LMCA stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right brand licensing
Brand licensing turns trademark and brand standards into enforceable rights for licensees through agreement-driven program governance. This buyer's guide compares the top brand licensing services providers covered by Brand Licensing Europe, Licensing Expo, and Kilburn & Strode, focusing on how each provider runs approvals and program administration.
LMCA leads the set with managed product and artwork approval workflow design, and CAA Brand Management follows with agreement-governed licensing operations across multiple licensees. Other providers included in the comparison are Bluestar Alliance, Iconix International, Global Icons, WHP Global, Authentic Brands Group, Joester Loria Group, Bravado, and WildBrain CPLG.
Brand licensing services for licensors: approvals, program governance, and royalty-ready operations
Brand licensing services administer the operational layer behind brand extension agreements, including artwork and sample approvals, documentation handoffs, and program coordination across licensees and product categories. The goal is consistent enforcement of brand standards across each approved product launch cycle.
LMCA differentiates through a managed product and artwork approval workflow that enforces brand standards across licensees and categories, while CAA Brand Management ties approvals and ongoing program administration to agreement-driven governance. Several other providers in the list also run multi-licensee administration, but the main differences show up in how approvals and reporting steps are coordinated and how much automation and configuration is handled through service delivery versus self-serve operations.
Brand licensing operations capabilities that govern approvals and rollout
Brand licensing services must translate brand standards into enforceable approval gates across artwork and sample submission cycles for each licensee. The operational difference is whether approvals run as a managed workflow with enforced consistency or as a more coordination-driven service model.
Licensors also need governance alignment between the submission workflow and the licensing agreement terms that drive who can approve what and when. The best providers in this set show that link through structured routing, documentation handoffs, and controlled rollout steps.
Managed approvals with enforced brand standards
LMCA runs a managed product and artwork approval workflow that enforces consistent brand standards across licensees and categories. WHP Global also provides a managed approvals workflow that coordinates artwork and product sign-off against brand standards across licensees and categories.
Agreement-driven governance tied to approval routing
CAA Brand Management ties approvals and ongoing program administration to agreement-driven governance across many licensees. Bravado connects partner management with artwork approval and ongoing royalty reporting under an operating model aligned to licensing program administration.
Submission tracking across artwork and sample review cycles
Bluestar Alliance coordinates approval execution with submission tracking across artwork and sample review cycles for standardized execution. Global Icons centralizes brand standards enforcement using artwork and sample approval coordination for controlled brand releases.
Program-level administration for multi-licensee operations
CAA Brand Management builds program administration designed for multi-category licensing operations across many licensees. Iconix International supports end-to-end licensing program operations that connect licensee workflows to ongoing creative approvals and brand standards application.
Service-delivered workflow execution versus self-serve configuration depth
Authentic Brands Group coordinates centralized brand standards and partner approvals through the licensing organization rather than a self-serve portal. WildBrain CPLG emphasizes end-to-end coordination of licensing approvals and royalty reporting as service-led workflow execution rather than generic rule configuration.
Select by approval governance depth and the automation boundary
A licensing program fails most often when approvals, documentation, and compliance steps run in disconnected processes that cannot enforce consistent brand standards across categories and territories. The providers in this set differ most in how they structure approvals, how much workflow governance they standardize, and how much automation is delivered via self-serve configuration versus service-led coordination.
The decision should start with whether the workflow needs managed enforcement across many licensees or whether internal teams already have stable review roles and only need workflow routing. Then the automation boundary should be matched to team capacity because throughput in managed review cycles depends on licensor responsiveness to review inputs.
Choose the approval model that matches brand-standard enforcement needs
If consistent brand standards must be enforced across multiple licensees and categories, LMCA runs managed product and artwork approval workflows designed for consistency. If brand standards enforcement must also include tightly coordinated sign-off across broader category approvals, WHP Global offers managed approvals workflow coverage.
Match governance to agreement-driven routing rather than informal handoffs
If approvals must follow licensing agreement governance, CAA Brand Management ties approval workflows to agreement-driven program administration. If the operating model also needs artwork and sample approvals tied to ongoing execution and compliant launches, Iconix International connects creative approvals and brand standards application across consumer categories.
Decide whether the workflow needs implementation-led integrations or self-serve automation
If integration needs are handled through implementation, Bluestar Alliance treats integration as an implementation task rather than a self-serve setup. If workflow governance and administration are expected to run as an operational delivery model, Bravado and WildBrain CPLG emphasize managed execution where automation depth depends on agreed workflows and service delivery.
Set expectations for submission completeness and review cycle lead times
If review cycles depend on complete submissions from licensees, CAA Brand Management explicitly depends on licensee submission completeness. If teams prefer workflow routing that reduces ad hoc coordination across artwork and sample stages, Bluestar Alliance and Global Icons run workflow-driven approval routing designed around artwork and sample submissions.
Select a coordination approach based on internal responsibility mapping
If governance mapping work must be performed to match internal review responsibilities, Bluestar Alliance requires mapping to internal roles for governance alignment. If governance needs a clearer operating model for product governance across licensees and launch coordination, LMCA offers a structured operating model centered on approvals and documentation enforcement.
Who benefits from brand licensing services like these
Licensors with multiple licensees and recurring product launches benefit most from providers that can run repeatable approval workflows across artwork and samples. The category-level workload becomes unmanageable when approvals, document handoffs, and governance steps rely on manual coordination.
Teams also benefit when the provider model matches internal review capacity. Managed approvals can reduce drift, but throughput still depends on licensor responsiveness to review inputs and on licensee submission quality.
Licensors running multi-category licensing programs
CAA Brand Management supports program administration across multi-category licensing operations with approval workflows tied to agreement governance.
Licensors who need enforced consistency across artwork and sample releases
LMCA enforces consistent brand standards through a managed product and artwork approval workflow across licensees and categories.
Licensing teams that want standardized routing across artwork and sample cycles
Bluestar Alliance coordinates approval workflow execution with submission tracking across artwork and sample review cycles for standardized execution.
Brands that prefer centralized governance through managed coordination
Authentic Brands Group centralizes brand standards and partner approvals through the licensing organization rather than a self-serve portal.
Licensors that accept service-led setup for end-to-end rollout and reporting workflow execution
WildBrain CPLG coordinates licensing approvals and royalty reporting as a managed operating workflow where automation depth depends on agreed workflows and service-led setup.
Common failure points when buying brand licensing services
Licensing programs break down when approval workflows are treated as a document routing problem instead of a governance problem. When approvals lack consistent enforcement and clear ownership mapping, brand standards drift across licensee product releases.
Another failure point is mismatching automation expectations with delivery realities. Providers that emphasize managed workflow execution can still require governance engagement, review inputs, and licensee submission completeness to hit cycle times.
Assuming fast throughput without accounting for licensor review responsiveness
LMCA highlights that high throughput depends on licensor responsiveness to review inputs. CAA Brand Management also notes that review cycles depend on complete submissions from licensees, so incomplete inputs extend timelines.
Selecting for deep self-serve configuration without checking integration expectations
Bluestar Alliance handles integration needs through implementation rather than self-serve setup, which changes delivery planning. Joester Loria Group also limits public detail on API surface and automation tooling for system integration, which can shift integration work into onboarding.
Overlooking workflow rigidity for low-risk changes
CAA Brand Management describes workflow rigidity that can add lead time for low-risk product changes. Iconix International uses a strong process focus and can add coordination overhead for complex multi-territory approvals when governance steps are tightly gated.
Treating reporting as configurable data pipelines when reporting is workflow-led
Joester Loria Group describes reporting coverage at a workflow level rather than as a configurable data pipeline. Global Icons also shows limited published automation detail for royalty tracking and royalty report pipelines.
Choosing a model that centralizes approvals but reduces visibility for operational teams
LMCA can limit visibility for teams that require deep custom workflow automation because managed review structure depends on the provider operating model. Authentic Brands Group ties workflow visibility to managed coordination rather than live portals, which can change day-to-day operational transparency.
How We Selected and Ranked These Providers
We evaluated LMCA, CAA Brand Management, Bluestar Alliance, Iconix International, Global Icons, WHP Global, Authentic Brands Group, Joester Loria Group, Bravado, and WildBrain CPLG using a features-weighted model at 40 percent and ease and value at 30 percent each. We prioritized integration depth signals like how the service boundary is described in managed workflow delivery and how automation and coordination are handled for approvals and program administration.
We also used operational proof points from each provider card such as LMCA’s managed product and artwork approval workflow for consistent brand standards and CAA Brand Management’s agreement-driven governance model tied to multi-licensee program administration. LMCA ranked first because its managed product and artwork approval workflow enforces consistent brand standards across licensees and categories while providing a clear operating model for product governance across approvals, documentation, and launch coordination.
Frequently Asked Questions About brand licensing
How do LMCA and CAA Brand Management differ in agreement execution versus day-to-day approvals?
Which providers connect artwork and sample approval tracking to contract governance without breaking auditability?
What breaks if an organization cannot map territory and channel rights to an approval workflow?
When do Bluestar Alliance and Joester Loria Group fit teams that handle high submission volumes across multiple licensees?
How do Global Icons and WHP Global handle compliance coordination during product release cycles?
What technical requirements matter for integrations and APIs when licensing workflows need automation?
How do Iconix International and Authentic Brands Group differ in onboarding and governance ownership across licensees?
Where do audit log, RBAC, and admin controls show up in licensing administration workflows?
What tradeoff appears when royalty reporting must match sell-in and sell-through expectations across licensees?
How should data migration be handled when moving from spreadsheets to workflow-driven licensing administration?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
- Marketing AdvertisingTop 10 Best Brand Advertising Services of 2026
- Art DesignTop 10 Best Brand Development Services of 2026
- Marketing AdvertisingTop 10 Best Brand Architecture Services of 2026
- Marketing AdvertisingTop 10 Best Brand Consultancy Services of 2026
- Marketing AdvertisingTop 10 Best Brand Building Services of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Business Finance alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of business finance tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare business finance tools→