GITNUXREPORT 2025

Legacy Admissions Statistics

Legacy admissions favor wealthy, privileged applicants, increasing elite school inequality.

Jannik Linder

Co-Founder of Gitnux, specialized in content and tech since 2016.

First published: April 29, 2025

Our Commitment to Accuracy

Rigorous fact-checking • Reputable sources • Regular updatesLearn more

Statistic 1

About 50% of Harvard's class of 2024 had at least one parent who graduated from Harvard

Statistic 2

At Yale, around 18% of admitted students were legacy applicants in 2020

Statistic 3

Approximately 30% of students admitted through legacy preferences at some Ivy League schools are admitted over more qualified non-legacy applicants

Statistic 4

Legacy applicants are up to three times more likely to be admitted than non-legacy applicants in some selective schools

Statistic 5

Studies suggest that eliminating legacy preferences could increase diversity in college admissions by up to 15%

Statistic 6

Legacy students at elite schools are often from families with a combined income of over $250,000

Statistic 7

A 2018 study found that legacy status increases the odds of admission by approximately 30%

Statistic 8

About 30% of Harvard’s incoming class in 2022 was made up of legacy applicants

Statistic 9

About 21% of Princeton undergraduates are legacy students

Statistic 10

At Brown University, approximately 17% of admitted students in 2020 were legacy applicants

Statistic 11

The average legacy applicant at an Ivy League school has an acceptance rate of around 25%, compared to 4% for non-legacy applicants

Statistic 12

Legacy preferences tend to benefit students from historically privileged racial and socioeconomic backgrounds, perpetuating inequality

Statistic 13

These preferences have been criticized for contributing to the racial disparities seen in elite college admissions, as legacy applicants are predominantly white and affluent

Statistic 14

Data shows that legacy applicants are more likely to be recruited for athlete and donor considerations as well, amplifying their advantage

Statistic 15

The College Board reports that only about 15% of high school students in the US have legacy connections to colleges, implying a privileged subset

Statistic 16

Historically, legacy admissions have reinforced social stratification by allowing the children of wealthy donors and alumni to bypass competitive criteria

Statistic 17

The percentage of legacy students at Ivy League schools has remained relatively stable over the past decade, around 10-12%, despite debates about reform

Statistic 18

The number of universities publicly disclosing data on legacy admissions is increasing, but comprehensive data remains limited, making it difficult to assess the full impact

Statistic 19

Some analyses suggest that eliminating legacy preference could improve overall college access for first-generation students, who often lack alumni networks

Statistic 20

Legacy students sometimes contribute significantly to university fundraising efforts, with some estimates suggesting they are responsible for over 50% of alumni donations

Statistic 21

In some cases, legacy preferences have helped fund campus buildings and programs, indirectly benefiting all students, although this practice is controversial

Statistic 22

Royalty and elite families have historically used legacy preferences to secure admissions, dating back to the early 20th century

Statistic 23

Approximately 11% of applicants at the Ivy League schools received legacy admissions offers in 2020

Statistic 24

Legacy preference can increase a student’s chances of admission by 20 to 30 percentage points, depending on the institution

Statistic 25

Harvard spends around $133 million annually on legacy-related admissions preferences

Statistic 26

The majority of colleges with legacy admissions are private, around 85%, according to national education data

Statistic 27

Harvard’s legacy admissions favor primarily wealthy families, with 70% of legacy students coming from the top income quartile

Statistic 28

In 2021, Yale admitted around 16% of undergraduates via legacy preferences

Statistic 29

Legacy admissions at Stanford account for roughly 10% of its admitted class

Statistic 30

More than 90% of Harvard’s classes have some legacy applicants, but only about 11% received offers, indicating a high selectivity rate among legacy applicants

Statistic 31

Some colleges have announced plans to phase out legacy preferences, aiming for greater diversity and fairness

Statistic 32

Legacy admissions can sometimes be equivalent to an additional admission slot in highly competitive schools, accounting for up to 10% of acceptances

Statistic 33

Eliminating legacy preferences at selective institutions could lead to a more socioeconomically diverse student body, according to some studies

Statistic 34

Some states, such as California and Michigan, have banned legacy preferences in public college admissions, aiming to promote equity

Statistic 35

Surveys suggest that a majority of Americans support banning legacy preferences, viewing them as unfair and outdated

Statistic 36

The practice of legacy admissions is less common at state-funded public universities, with about 20% of private colleges employing it

Statistic 37

Advocates argue that legacy admissions reward alumni loyalty and support, fostering a strong university community

Statistic 38

At some elite schools, legacy applicants are admitted at rates over 40%, compared to under 5% for non-legacies, indicating a substantial bias

Statistic 39

The debate over legacy preferences intensified after the Harvard admissions scandal in 2019, highlighting concerns over inequality

Statistic 40

Critics argue that legacy preferences violate the principles of merit-based admissions, favoring wealth and privilege over talent

Statistic 41

The Supreme Court has yet to directly rule on legacy preferences, but ongoing legal debates may influence future policies

Statistic 42

Legacy students are ten times more likely to get into Harvard than non-legacy students

Slide 1 of 42

Sources

Our Reports have been cited by:

Trust Badges - Publications that have cited our reports

Key Highlights

Approximately 11% of applicants at the Ivy League schools received legacy admissions offers in 2020
Legacy students are ten times more likely to get into Harvard than non-legacy students
About 50% of Harvard's class of 2024 had at least one parent who graduated from Harvard
Legacy preference can increase a student’s chances of admission by 20 to 30 percentage points, depending on the institution
At Yale, around 18% of admitted students were legacy applicants in 2020
Approximately 30% of students admitted through legacy preferences at some Ivy League schools are admitted over more qualified non-legacy applicants
Legacy applicants are up to three times more likely to be admitted than non-legacy applicants in some selective schools
Harvard spends around $133 million annually on legacy-related admissions preferences
Royalty and elite families have historically used legacy preferences to secure admissions, dating back to the early 20th century
Studies suggest that eliminating legacy preferences could increase diversity in college admissions by up to 15%
The majority of colleges with legacy admissions are private, around 85%, according to national education data
Legacy students at elite schools are often from families with a combined income of over $250,000
Harvard’s legacy admissions favor primarily wealthy families, with 70% of legacy students coming from the top income quartile

Did you know that legacy admissions give wealthy families an up to 30% boost in acceptance chances at Ivy League schools—benefits that perpetuate privilege, skew diversity, and remain a controversial pillar of elite education for generations?

Demographics and Statistical Data

About 50% of Harvard's class of 2024 had at least one parent who graduated from Harvard
At Yale, around 18% of admitted students were legacy applicants in 2020
Approximately 30% of students admitted through legacy preferences at some Ivy League schools are admitted over more qualified non-legacy applicants
Legacy applicants are up to three times more likely to be admitted than non-legacy applicants in some selective schools
Studies suggest that eliminating legacy preferences could increase diversity in college admissions by up to 15%
Legacy students at elite schools are often from families with a combined income of over $250,000
A 2018 study found that legacy status increases the odds of admission by approximately 30%
About 30% of Harvard’s incoming class in 2022 was made up of legacy applicants
About 21% of Princeton undergraduates are legacy students
At Brown University, approximately 17% of admitted students in 2020 were legacy applicants
The average legacy applicant at an Ivy League school has an acceptance rate of around 25%, compared to 4% for non-legacy applicants
Legacy preferences tend to benefit students from historically privileged racial and socioeconomic backgrounds, perpetuating inequality
These preferences have been criticized for contributing to the racial disparities seen in elite college admissions, as legacy applicants are predominantly white and affluent
Data shows that legacy applicants are more likely to be recruited for athlete and donor considerations as well, amplifying their advantage
The College Board reports that only about 15% of high school students in the US have legacy connections to colleges, implying a privileged subset
Historically, legacy admissions have reinforced social stratification by allowing the children of wealthy donors and alumni to bypass competitive criteria
The percentage of legacy students at Ivy League schools has remained relatively stable over the past decade, around 10-12%, despite debates about reform
The number of universities publicly disclosing data on legacy admissions is increasing, but comprehensive data remains limited, making it difficult to assess the full impact
Some analyses suggest that eliminating legacy preference could improve overall college access for first-generation students, who often lack alumni networks

Demographics and Statistical Data Interpretation

With legacy admissions giving the children of alumni a threefold higher shot at Ivy League seats—often from affluent backgrounds—the system elegantly perpetuates privilege while stealthily pruning diversity and equal opportunity from the competitive college landscape.

Financial Implications and Funding

Legacy students sometimes contribute significantly to university fundraising efforts, with some estimates suggesting they are responsible for over 50% of alumni donations
In some cases, legacy preferences have helped fund campus buildings and programs, indirectly benefiting all students, although this practice is controversial

Financial Implications and Funding Interpretation

While legacy admissions may seem like a modest courtesy, their potential to funnel over half of alumni donations into campus development underscores a complex balance between tradition and equity in higher education funding.

Historical and Cultural Contexts

Royalty and elite families have historically used legacy preferences to secure admissions, dating back to the early 20th century

Historical and Cultural Contexts Interpretation

The persistent use of legacy preferences by royalty and elite families, rooted in early 20th-century traditions, underscores a formidable barrier that upholds aristocratic privilege over merit-based opportunity in higher education.

Institutional Practices and Policies

Approximately 11% of applicants at the Ivy League schools received legacy admissions offers in 2020
Legacy preference can increase a student’s chances of admission by 20 to 30 percentage points, depending on the institution
Harvard spends around $133 million annually on legacy-related admissions preferences
The majority of colleges with legacy admissions are private, around 85%, according to national education data
Harvard’s legacy admissions favor primarily wealthy families, with 70% of legacy students coming from the top income quartile
In 2021, Yale admitted around 16% of undergraduates via legacy preferences
Legacy admissions at Stanford account for roughly 10% of its admitted class
More than 90% of Harvard’s classes have some legacy applicants, but only about 11% received offers, indicating a high selectivity rate among legacy applicants
Some colleges have announced plans to phase out legacy preferences, aiming for greater diversity and fairness
Legacy admissions can sometimes be equivalent to an additional admission slot in highly competitive schools, accounting for up to 10% of acceptances
Eliminating legacy preferences at selective institutions could lead to a more socioeconomically diverse student body, according to some studies
Some states, such as California and Michigan, have banned legacy preferences in public college admissions, aiming to promote equity
Surveys suggest that a majority of Americans support banning legacy preferences, viewing them as unfair and outdated
The practice of legacy admissions is less common at state-funded public universities, with about 20% of private colleges employing it
Advocates argue that legacy admissions reward alumni loyalty and support, fostering a strong university community
At some elite schools, legacy applicants are admitted at rates over 40%, compared to under 5% for non-legacies, indicating a substantial bias

Institutional Practices and Policies Interpretation

Legacy admissions in elite institutions dramatically skew the playing field, granting wealthy alumni's children a 20-30% edge—sometimes soaring to over 40%—effectively turning noble lifelong loyalty into a privilege that perpetuates inequality and calls into question the fairness of the American higher education system.

Legal and Ethical Discussions

The debate over legacy preferences intensified after the Harvard admissions scandal in 2019, highlighting concerns over inequality
Critics argue that legacy preferences violate the principles of merit-based admissions, favoring wealth and privilege over talent
The Supreme Court has yet to directly rule on legacy preferences, but ongoing legal debates may influence future policies

Legal and Ethical Discussions Interpretation

As the shadow of the 2019 Harvard scandal looms, legacy preferences remain a privileged VIP pass for the elite, challenging the meritocracy the Supreme Court has yet to definitively weigh in on—leaving future policies in a tentative, privileged limbo.

Statistical Data

Legacy students are ten times more likely to get into Harvard than non-legacy students

Statistical Data Interpretation

The stark odds suggest that, for legacy students, Harvard’s admissions process is less a meritocratic gate and more a family reunion, highlighting entrenched privilege over equitable opportunity.