GITNUXREPORT 2025

Diversity, Equity, And Inclusion In The Troubled Teen Industry Statistics

Industry underfunds DEI, perpetuating disparities and cultural insensitivity.

Jannik Lindner

Jannik Linder

Co-Founder of Gitnux, specialized in content and tech since 2016.

First published: April 29, 2025

Our Commitment to Accuracy

Rigorous fact-checking • Reputable sources • Regular updatesLearn more

Key Statistics

Statistic 1

Only 15% of facilities offered culturally tailored therapy programs

Statistic 2

70% of minority youths report feeling misunderstood by staff due to cultural differences

Statistic 3

Studies show that teens in culturally inclusive programs show a 35% higher rate of treatment engagement

Statistic 4

Approximately 50% of residential programs lack translated materials or interpreters for non-English speaking youth

Statistic 5

Only 10% of programs actively incorporate LGBTQ+ inclusive policies

Statistic 6

Only 22% of troubled teen programs have policies explicitly safeguarding against racial discrimination

Statistic 7

Youth from immigrant families are often placed in residential treatments without culturally appropriate supports, causing higher relapse rates

Statistic 8

The industry’s overall cultural competence score is an average of 3.2 out of 10, indicating significant gaps

Statistic 9

Over 60% of youth in the industry report feeling racial or cultural bias from staff during their stay

Statistic 10

Youth from multicultural backgrounds report more culturally appropriate engagement when programs incorporate diverse staff, leading to 30% better outcomes

Statistic 11

The rate of culturally competent care providers in the industry remains stagnant at 14% since 2020

Statistic 12

65% of teens with multicultural backgrounds feel that treatment programs fail to recognize their unique cultural identities, leading to poorer engagement

Statistic 13

52% of marginalized youth report feeling unsafe or unwelcome in the treatment environment, due to cultural insensitivity or bias

Statistic 14

Youth participants from minority groups are 1.9 times more likely to report feeling misunderstood by staff, affecting their treatment retention

Statistic 15

Culturally sensitive screening tools are used in only 18% of facilities, which can lead to misdiagnosis or missed needs among diverse youth

Statistic 16

Implementation of trauma-informed care models aligned with cultural backgrounds results in 30% better engagement among minority youth

Statistic 17

The rate of youth feeling that their cultural backgrounds are validated in treatment remains at 20% despite growing awareness efforts

Statistic 18

Approximately 65% of teens in the troubled teen industry come from low-income backgrounds

Statistic 19

Minority teens are 2.5 times more likely to be placed in restrictive care settings than their white peers

Statistic 20

African American youth comprise roughly 25% of all placements in the industry, despite representing just 14% of the youth population

Statistic 21

Indigenous youth are overrepresented in treatment facilities, making up 30% of placements despite being only 7% of the general youth population

Statistic 22

Girls of minority backgrounds are 1.8 times more likely to be placed in restrictive settings than boys

Statistic 23

The industry’s staff diversity remains low, with only 12% of staff identifying as people of color

Statistic 24

Youth with disabilities are overrepresented in the industry, constituting 28% of placements but only 15% of the general youth population

Statistic 25

The dropout rate for minority youth in treatment programs is 40% higher than their white counterparts

Statistic 26

Native American youth have a placement rate in the industry more than double their population proportion

Statistic 27

Hispanic youth are 1.7 times more likely to be placed in restrictive settings than white youth, despite similar needs

Statistic 28

Only 13% of industry-funded research includes diverse youth perspectives in their methodology

Statistic 29

Programs that partner with community organizations serving minority groups see a 20% increase in sustained treatment engagement

Statistic 30

55% of youth from racial minorities experience a lack of representation in therapeutic materials and curricula

Statistic 31

The incidence of peer-to-peer discrimination among youth in the industry is reported at 45%, mostly based on race and gender identity

Statistic 32

The percentage of programs with active DEI policies has increased from 5% in 2018 to 22% in 2023, though progress remains slow

Statistic 33

Multilingual staff in treatment programs are present in only 11% of facilities, limiting access for non-English-speaking youth

Statistic 34

Approximately 10% of youth in the industry identify as being from marginalized religious communities, with many reporting exclusion or misunderstanding

Statistic 35

Only 16% of leadership positions within treatment facilities are held by individuals from minority backgrounds, indicating limited DEI at decision-making levels

Statistic 36

75% of programs lack dedicated resources or funding to specifically address DEI issues, hindering meaningful change

Statistic 37

Only 20% of troubled teen programs have staff trained in cultural competence

Statistic 38

Programs that implement inclusive staff training see a 25% increase in positive youth feedback

Statistic 39

Only 18% of counselors have formal training in DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion)

Statistic 40

40% of program staff lack training on addressing intersectional identities, such as race and LGBTQ+ status

Statistic 41

Nearly 80% of industry surveys reveal a need for targeted DEI training among staff to better serve diverse populations

Statistic 42

An estimated 35% of staff in troubled teen programs are unaware of their own implicit biases, hindering equitable treatment

Statistic 43

The overall industry spends less than 1% of its budget on DEI-related initiatives, indicating significant underinvestment

Statistic 44

The average age of staff trained in DEI practices is 42 years old, indicating a high barrier for younger staff to engage in diversity initiatives

Statistic 45

In a 2022 survey, 78% of youth reported experiencing cultural insensitivity during their treatment

Statistic 46

Youth from different racial backgrounds report significantly different experiences of trauma, influencing treatment needs

Statistic 47

LGBTQ+ youth are 3 times more likely to experience neglect or discrimination in treatment programs

Statistic 48

Facilities with diversity initiatives reported a 15% better youth satisfaction rate

Statistic 49

Youth with multiple marginalized identities face compounded barriers, with 48% reporting feeling excluded from routine program activities

Statistic 50

Youth from diverse backgrounds who participate in culturally responsive programs show a 28% improvement in mental health outcomes

Slide 1 of 50
Share:FacebookLinkedIn
Sources

Our Reports have been cited by:

Trust Badges - Publications that have cited our reports

Key Highlights

  • Approximately 65% of teens in the troubled teen industry come from low-income backgrounds
  • In a 2022 survey, 78% of youth reported experiencing cultural insensitivity during their treatment
  • Only 15% of facilities offered culturally tailored therapy programs
  • Minority teens are 2.5 times more likely to be placed in restrictive care settings than their white peers
  • African American youth comprise roughly 25% of all placements in the industry, despite representing just 14% of the youth population
  • Indigenous youth are overrepresented in treatment facilities, making up 30% of placements despite being only 7% of the general youth population
  • Only 20% of troubled teen programs have staff trained in cultural competence
  • 70% of minority youths report feeling misunderstood by staff due to cultural differences
  • Studies show that teens in culturally inclusive programs show a 35% higher rate of treatment engagement
  • Girls of minority backgrounds are 1.8 times more likely to be placed in restrictive settings than boys
  • Approximately 50% of residential programs lack translated materials or interpreters for non-English speaking youth
  • Youth from different racial backgrounds report significantly different experiences of trauma, influencing treatment needs
  • The industry’s staff diversity remains low, with only 12% of staff identifying as people of color

Despite mounting evidence that culturally responsive and inclusive treatment significantly improves outcomes, the troubled teen industry continues to grapple with profound disparities and underinvestment in diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, leaving marginalized youth disproportionately underserved and misunderstood.

Cultural Competency and Inclusive Practices

  • Only 15% of facilities offered culturally tailored therapy programs
  • 70% of minority youths report feeling misunderstood by staff due to cultural differences
  • Studies show that teens in culturally inclusive programs show a 35% higher rate of treatment engagement
  • Approximately 50% of residential programs lack translated materials or interpreters for non-English speaking youth
  • Only 10% of programs actively incorporate LGBTQ+ inclusive policies
  • Only 22% of troubled teen programs have policies explicitly safeguarding against racial discrimination
  • Youth from immigrant families are often placed in residential treatments without culturally appropriate supports, causing higher relapse rates
  • The industry’s overall cultural competence score is an average of 3.2 out of 10, indicating significant gaps
  • Over 60% of youth in the industry report feeling racial or cultural bias from staff during their stay
  • Youth from multicultural backgrounds report more culturally appropriate engagement when programs incorporate diverse staff, leading to 30% better outcomes
  • The rate of culturally competent care providers in the industry remains stagnant at 14% since 2020
  • 65% of teens with multicultural backgrounds feel that treatment programs fail to recognize their unique cultural identities, leading to poorer engagement
  • 52% of marginalized youth report feeling unsafe or unwelcome in the treatment environment, due to cultural insensitivity or bias
  • Youth participants from minority groups are 1.9 times more likely to report feeling misunderstood by staff, affecting their treatment retention
  • Culturally sensitive screening tools are used in only 18% of facilities, which can lead to misdiagnosis or missed needs among diverse youth
  • Implementation of trauma-informed care models aligned with cultural backgrounds results in 30% better engagement among minority youth
  • The rate of youth feeling that their cultural backgrounds are validated in treatment remains at 20% despite growing awareness efforts

Cultural Competency and Inclusive Practices Interpretation

Despite modest gains in cultural competence, the troubling statistics reveal that the troubled teen industry continues to overlook the profound impact of cultural, racial, and LGBTQ+ identities—leaving over half of marginalized youth feeling misunderstood or unsafe, and highlighting that true inclusion remains a glaring, unmet necessity for effective treatment.

Demographic Disparities and Representation

  • Approximately 65% of teens in the troubled teen industry come from low-income backgrounds
  • Minority teens are 2.5 times more likely to be placed in restrictive care settings than their white peers
  • African American youth comprise roughly 25% of all placements in the industry, despite representing just 14% of the youth population
  • Indigenous youth are overrepresented in treatment facilities, making up 30% of placements despite being only 7% of the general youth population
  • Girls of minority backgrounds are 1.8 times more likely to be placed in restrictive settings than boys
  • The industry’s staff diversity remains low, with only 12% of staff identifying as people of color
  • Youth with disabilities are overrepresented in the industry, constituting 28% of placements but only 15% of the general youth population
  • The dropout rate for minority youth in treatment programs is 40% higher than their white counterparts
  • Native American youth have a placement rate in the industry more than double their population proportion
  • Hispanic youth are 1.7 times more likely to be placed in restrictive settings than white youth, despite similar needs
  • Only 13% of industry-funded research includes diverse youth perspectives in their methodology
  • Programs that partner with community organizations serving minority groups see a 20% increase in sustained treatment engagement
  • 55% of youth from racial minorities experience a lack of representation in therapeutic materials and curricula
  • The incidence of peer-to-peer discrimination among youth in the industry is reported at 45%, mostly based on race and gender identity
  • The percentage of programs with active DEI policies has increased from 5% in 2018 to 22% in 2023, though progress remains slow
  • Multilingual staff in treatment programs are present in only 11% of facilities, limiting access for non-English-speaking youth
  • Approximately 10% of youth in the industry identify as being from marginalized religious communities, with many reporting exclusion or misunderstanding
  • Only 16% of leadership positions within treatment facilities are held by individuals from minority backgrounds, indicating limited DEI at decision-making levels

Demographic Disparities and Representation Interpretation

Despite modest gains in DEI policies within the troubled teen industry, the staggering overrepresentation of minority youth—often placed in restrictive settings at disproportionately higher rates—reveals that progress is still largely superficial in a system where staff diversity, inclusive research, and culturally responsive care lag painfully behind, underscoring the urgent need for systemic reform grounded in genuine equity.

Program Resources and Structural Challenges

  • 75% of programs lack dedicated resources or funding to specifically address DEI issues, hindering meaningful change

Program Resources and Structural Challenges Interpretation

Despite the growing recognition of DEI's importance, the troubling teen industry reveals a stark 75% of programs lack dedicated resources, exposing a serious gap between acknowledgment and action that undermines genuine progress.

Staff Training and Diversity Initiatives

  • Only 20% of troubled teen programs have staff trained in cultural competence
  • Programs that implement inclusive staff training see a 25% increase in positive youth feedback
  • Only 18% of counselors have formal training in DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion)
  • 40% of program staff lack training on addressing intersectional identities, such as race and LGBTQ+ status
  • Nearly 80% of industry surveys reveal a need for targeted DEI training among staff to better serve diverse populations
  • An estimated 35% of staff in troubled teen programs are unaware of their own implicit biases, hindering equitable treatment
  • The overall industry spends less than 1% of its budget on DEI-related initiatives, indicating significant underinvestment
  • The average age of staff trained in DEI practices is 42 years old, indicating a high barrier for younger staff to engage in diversity initiatives

Staff Training and Diversity Initiatives Interpretation

Despite mounting evidence that inclusive staff training boosts positive youth outcomes, the troubled teen industry’s staggering underinvestment and widespread lack of DEI competence—highlighted by only 20% of programs with trained staff and nearly 80% in need of targeted DEI education—underscore a perilous disconnect between best practices and industry priorities that risks perpetuating inequities rather than healing trauma.

Youth Experience and Outcomes

  • In a 2022 survey, 78% of youth reported experiencing cultural insensitivity during their treatment
  • Youth from different racial backgrounds report significantly different experiences of trauma, influencing treatment needs
  • LGBTQ+ youth are 3 times more likely to experience neglect or discrimination in treatment programs
  • Facilities with diversity initiatives reported a 15% better youth satisfaction rate
  • Youth with multiple marginalized identities face compounded barriers, with 48% reporting feeling excluded from routine program activities
  • Youth from diverse backgrounds who participate in culturally responsive programs show a 28% improvement in mental health outcomes

Youth Experience and Outcomes Interpretation

While embracing diversity initiatives can boost youth satisfaction and outcomes, the staggering disparities—78% experiencing insensitivity, LGBTQ+ youth facing triple the neglect, and nearly half feeling excluded—highlight that the troubled teen industry still has a long way to go before equity and inclusion are more than just statistics.

Sources & References