GITNUX MARKETDATA REPORT 2024

Diabetes Race Statistics: Market Report & Data

🔥 Brand New

Our Free Guide: Master the Art of AI-Assisted Research

In our guide, we’ll show you how small tweaks and additions to your research process with AI can significantly improve your academic work.

Highlights: Diabetes Race Statistics

  • In 2018, the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes in the U.S. was 7.7% among non-Hispanic whites, 11.7% among non-Hispanic Blacks, 13.0% among Hispanics, and 12.5% among Asians.
  • Among US adults aged 18 years or older, diabetes was least prevalent among non-Hispanic whites and most prevalent among American Indians/Alaska Natives in 2018.
  • Asian Americans have a 60% higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes than their white counterparts.
  • Hispanics are 1.2 times more likely to have diabetes as compared to non-Hispanic whites.
  • In the United States, 14.7% of non-Hispanic Black adults had diagnosed diabetes in 2018.
  • African Americans are almost twice as likely to be diagnosed with diabetes as non-Hispanic whites.
  • A total of 15.3% of Hispanics have diabetes compared to a percentage of 7.6 for non-Hispanic whites.
  • Among Asian Americans, after adjusting for population age differences, diabetes rates were approximately 20% higher among Filipinos and South Asians compared with Chinese and Koreans in 2018.
  • Indigenous people in the United States are 2.2 times more likely to have diabetes than non-Hispanic whites.
  • The prevalence of diabetes in adults is 19% for American Indian/Alaska Native adults.
  • The prevalence of diagnosed diabetes among Asian Americans in the USA is approximately 10%, but when including undiagnosed cases, the prevalence is closer to 20%.
  • In 2017, the rate of diagnosed diabetes in African American men was 13.4% and for women, 12.7%.
  • Diabetes is the fifth leading cause of death for Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders.
  • The risk of diabetes among Hispanic/Latino adults in the US is nearly twice as high as among non-Hispanic white adults.
  • American Indian and Alaska Natives were 2.6 times more likely to be diagnosed with diabetes as non-Hispanic whites in 2018.
  • The age-adjusted prevalence of diabetes in Latinx adults in the US is 17.9%.
  • South Asians make up over 60% of the world's heart disease patients and are four times more at risk of type 2 diabetes compared to other ethnicities.
  • African Caribbean communities are at a three times higher risk of type 2 diabetes than their European counterparts in the UK.
  • In Canada, First Nations adults are 3 to 5 times more likely than non-Aboriginal adults to be diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.
  • In Australia, the prevalence of self-reported, doctor-diagnosed diabetes is three times higher among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people than non-Indigenous people.

Discover our favorite AI Writing Tool

Speed up your source research process with AI

Jenni's AI-powered text editor helps you write, edit, and cite with confidence. Save hours on your next paper

Table of Contents

Gaining a comprehensive understanding of the dynamics of health conditions across different demographics enables us to better manage and tackle disease prevalence. In this blog post, we delve into the intricacies of Diabetes Race Statistics, examining how ethnicity and race factor into the prevalence, severity, and management of diabetes. These statistics not only highlight health disparities but also advocate for targeted public health interventions. As we navigate through these data, we seek to elucidate patterns, implications, and drive for more inclusive healthcare strategies.

The Latest Diabetes Race Statistics Unveiled

In 2018, the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes in the U.S. was 7.7% among non-Hispanic whites, 11.7% among non-Hispanic Blacks, 13.0% among Hispanics, and 12.5% among Asians.

Grasping the disparity reflected in these percentages is crucial to understanding the racial dynamics of diabetes prevalence in the U.S., based on the 2018 data. Providing clear evidence of a higher affliction rate among non-Hispanic Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians as compared to their non-Hispanic white counterparts, these figures raise pertinent questions about the role of racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and environmental factors in health outcomes. They underscore the urgency for more inclusive and targeted healthcare strategies. By dissecting these statistics, the blog post seeks to unearth the complex interactions of race and diabetes, making a stride towards more mindful conversation on health equity and racial justice.

Among US adults aged 18 years or older, diabetes was least prevalent among non-Hispanic whites and most prevalent among American Indians/Alaska Natives in 2018.

The unique depth that our review of 2018 Diabetes Race Statistics in US adults plumbs unveils a compelling narrative, spotlighting a stark racial disparity that critically intersects with the healthcare landscape. Setting non-Hispanic whites and American Indians/Alaska Natives at two ends of the spectrum, the narrative underscores diabetes not as a common enemy, but a potent adversary that is more likely to duel with American Indians/Alaska Natives. This divergence urges a deeper exploration of the underlying factors and amplifies the need for tailoring health strategies, forging a path toward alleviating the disparity, and improving diabetes care for these disproportionately affected communities.

Asian Americans have a 60% higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes than their white counterparts.

Drawing a vivid picture from the tapestry of diabetes racial statistics, there’s an uncanny disparity worth more than a glance – Asian Americans bearing a 60% higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes in comparison to their white counterparts. This striking figure underscores a poignant narrative of a distinct health trajectory, knitting together vital threads of race, genetic susceptibility, lifestyle, and healthcare access. For readers digesting these statistics, it plants a seed of curiosity to probe deeper into the underlying reasons, provokes a demand for racial-specific strategies within the diabetology field, and fosters a sense of urgency in improving healthcare outreach for Asian American communities.

Hispanics are 1.2 times more likely to have diabetes as compared to non-Hispanic whites.

In the canvas of a blog post on Diabetes Race Statistics, the particular statistic – Hispanics being 1.2 times more prone to diabetes than non-Hispanic whites, serves as a critical shade. It paints a striking picture of health disparities accentuated by elements such as race and ethnicity. It underscores the urgency to introduce tailored interventions to address disease prevalence amongst Hispanics more effectively. Additionally, it hints towards larger socio-economic and environmental factors contributing to these health inequities. Hence, it is an essential number for public health officials, policy makers, and healthcare providers to contemplate, in order to create comprehensive, culturally-sensitive diabetes prevention and management strategies.

In the United States, 14.7% of non-Hispanic Black adults had diagnosed diabetes in 2018.

Shedding light on the racial disparities apparent in health diagnoses, particularly in the incidence of diabetes, the statistic that 14.7% of non-Hispanic Black adults in the United States were diagnosed with diabetes in 2018 unveils a critical panorama of racial inequality in health care. It underscores the need for targeted public health interventions and for tailoring diabetes management programs to address the unique cultural, societal, and health needs of the African American community, thus enhancing the clinical support for a population that is far too often marginalized within the healthcare system. The statistic prompts discussions on social determinants of health and the concerning connection between race and diabetes prevalence, adding a crucial dimension to our understanding of wider systemic health disparities.

African Americans are almost twice as likely to be diagnosed with diabetes as non-Hispanic whites.

Unveiling the race dynamic in disease prevalence like diabetes forms a critical aspect of understanding health disparities and the societal factors influencing them. The fact that African Americans have almost twice the probability of being diagnosed with diabetes compared to their non-Hispanic white counterparts underscores the pressing need to address and interrogate the potential causes behind this alarming trend. Such an analysis could bring to light differing genetic predispositions, socio-economic circumstances, cultural dietary habits or healthcare accessibility issues and aid in designing race-specific intervention strategies and policies aimed at reducing the prevalence of diabetes among the African American population. Detailed study of these racial disparities in diabetes could also contribute to personalized healthcare approaches, and ultimately, ameliorate lifestyle diseases’ burden.

A total of 15.3% of Hispanics have diabetes compared to a percentage of 7.6 for non-Hispanic whites.

Suffusing the blog post with profound insights, this compelling data underscores the differential health outcomes entrenched in racial parameters. Elucidating upon the extent of the diabetes epidemic, the statistics dramatically underscore the disparate incidence rate at 15.3% among Hispanics as contrasted with a mere 7.6% in non-Hispanic white individuals. This gap illustrates an undeniable racial disparity, prompting an urgent call for focused intervention strategies and further inquiry into socio-economic, environmental, and perhaps genetic factors responsible for such inequality in health. Conveying a broader context about the impact of race on the prevalence of diabetes, these statistics powerfully challenge healthcare providers, policy makers, and researchers to address and mitigate these disparities.

Among Asian Americans, after adjusting for population age differences, diabetes rates were approximately 20% higher among Filipinos and South Asians compared with Chinese and Koreans in 2018.

In the kaleidoscope of statistics that paint the picture of diabetes, this 2018 statistic showcases an intriguing reality within the Asian American community. Through the lens of demographic detail, it reveals that not only does ethnicity play a significant role in diabetes prevalence but also that subgroups within the same ethnicity may exhibit significant discrepancies. In this instance, Filipinos and South Asians experience a notable 20% higher incidence of diabetes compared to their Chinese and Korean counterparts, when considering age-adjusted rates. Therefore, this statistic illuminates the importance of fine-grained research in informing targeted diabetes education, prevention, and intervention at the most impactful, community-specific level in the discourse of race-based diabetes trends.

Indigenous people in the United States are 2.2 times more likely to have diabetes than non-Hispanic whites.

Illuminating the disparity in health scenarios across various racial and ethnic groups, this striking statistic reveals the alarming prevalence of diabetes among Indigenous populations in the United States—emphasizing a critical health concern that warrants immediate attention. The stark 2.2 times higher likelihood of Indigenous people being diagnosed with diabetes compared to non-Hispanic whites underscores not only the widespread nature of this chronic condition but also its disproportionate impact on certain racial/ethnic communities. In the broader discussion around Diabetes Race Statistics, this revelation underscores the urgent need for targeted interventions, fills a crucial knowledge gap, and fuels a more comprehensive understanding of the patterns and nuances characterizing diabetes’ epidemiology.

The prevalence of diabetes in adults is 19% for American Indian/Alaska Native adults.

Embedding this statistic into a blog post about Diabetes Race Statistics underscores the sobering reality of how race can significantly influence health outcomes. With a stunning 19% prevalence rate among American Indian/Alaska Native adults, it prompts us to deeply scrutinize the entrenched social, economic, and environmental factors that disproportionately inflate diabetes risk within these communities. It serves as a stark reminder that public health campaigns and interventions must account for these discerning racial disparities to ensure equitable health solutions.

The prevalence of diagnosed diabetes among Asian Americans in the USA is approximately 10%, but when including undiagnosed cases, the prevalence is closer to 20%.

Delving into the complexities of diabetes among different races, the startling observation that the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes in Asian Americans is about 10%, nearly doubles to 20% when considering undiagnosed cases, forms a crucial element of the discussion. This disparity uncovers alarming underdiagnosis in the Asian American population, posing significant challenges in early intervention and disease management. It enlightens us about an urgent need for proactive screening and improved healthcare literacy within this demographic. In essence, this statistic punctuates the narrative in a diabetes race statistics blog post, stirring crucial contemplation over healthcare policies, race-specific risk assessments, and the broader pursuit of healthcare equity.

In 2017, the rate of diagnosed diabetes in African American men was 13.4% and for women, 12.7%.

Unveiling the disparity in diabetes diagnosis rates amongst African American men (13.4%) and women (12.7%) in 2017 can serve as a crucial keystroke in the evolving narrative of Diabetes Race Statistics. These figures not only highlight the heightened vulnerability of this racial group to diabetes, but they underscore the subtle, yet significant gender-based variation within the community itself. This metric, when scrutinized through the lens of healthcare access, lifestyle, genetics, and other socioeconomic factors, can help tailor more effective and targeted diabetes prevention strategies for African Americans, making it an indispensable piece in the complex diabetes racial puzzle.

Diabetes is the fifth leading cause of death for Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders.

Spotlighting the ranking of diabetes as the fifth top killer among Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders underlines the silent-but-significant impact of this disease within these communities – an impact often camouflaged by broader discussions. It stimulates a targeted focus on racial health disparities and calls for a serious look into determining the unique factors influencing this trend, such as genetics, lifestyle, and societal influences. In a blog post about diabetes race statistics, it serves as a critical reminder that strategies for prevention, early detection, and effective management should be uniquely tailored, as health issues don’t present and progress uniformly across all ethnic groups.

The risk of diabetes among Hispanic/Latino adults in the US is nearly twice as high as among non-Hispanic white adults.

Encased within the revealing statistic that the prevalence of diabetes in Hispanic/Latino adults in the US is nearly twice that of non-Hispanic white adults, one discerns the imperative to appraise health disparities entrenched in racial and ethnic lines. Within the narrative of our blog post on Diabetes Race Statistics, this finding underpins a more extensive dialogue on health equity, spotlighting the urgency for targeted interventions, customized education, and research to comprehend these disparities better. This statistic, a mirror to the societal imbalance, underscores the need for us to delve deeper into the causal factors – environmental, genetic or lifestyle-related – that contribute to this heightened vulnerability amongst Hispanic/Latino adults.

American Indian and Alaska Natives were 2.6 times more likely to be diagnosed with diabetes as non-Hispanic whites in 2018.

Shedding light on the alarming disparity entrenched in our healthcare system, the fact that ‘American Indian and Alaska Natives were 2.6 times more likely to be diagnosed with diabetes as non-Hispanic whites in 2018’ underscores a critical focus of the blog post. It adds depth to the conversation on race-related distribution of diabetes, highlighting the pressing need for targeted interventions and health policies. By drawing attention to the disproportionate burden experienced by American Indian and Alaska Native populations, this statistic emphasizes the importance of addressing root causes such as genetic predisposition, socio-economic hindrances, dietary habits and limited access to healthcare – issues that transcend mere numbers and percentages, delving into areas of social justice and healthcare equity.

The age-adjusted prevalence of diabetes in Latinx adults in the US is 17.9%.

In the context of Diabetes Race Statistics, the disclosure that ‘The age-adjusted prevalence of diabetes in Latinx adults in the US is 17.9%’ plays a pivotal role. This figure, pregnant with implication, serves as a striking testament to the disparities in health outcomes existing among different racial and ethnic groups – unmistakably spotlighting the heightened vulnerability of the Latinx community to diabetes. This statistic, thus, not only entertains but educates, acting as both a yardstick to assess public health policy’s efficacy and a clarion call to redouble efforts for preventive measures, improved access to health care, and targeted interventions within this demographic. As we disseminate knowledge on this topic, we empower the reader to better understand the racial and ethnic intricacies in the landscape of diabetes, strengthening their grasp on the complex mosaic of health and disease.

South Asians make up over 60% of the world’s heart disease patients and are four times more at risk of type 2 diabetes compared to other ethnicities.

Undeniably, the startling statistic that South Asians comprise over 60% of global heart disease patients and possess four times higher risk of type 2 diabetes than other ethnic groups, offers an alarming glimpse into the compelling links between ethnicity and disease prevalence. In the realm of a blog post on Diabetes Race Statistics, such information serves as an incendiary revelation, highlighting the urgent need for focused preventive strategies and interventions designed specifically for South Asians. It underscores the dire reality of health disparities caused by race, driving home the stark and poignant message that ethnicity, far beyond simple genetic inheritance, can indeed be a definitive determinant of an individual’s health outcome.

African Caribbean communities are at a three times higher risk of type 2 diabetes than their European counterparts in the UK.

Exploring the statistic of African Caribbean communities having a three times higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes compared to their European counterparts in the UK, we delve into a critical revelation. It unearths the profound interface between race and health outcomes, particularly in the context of diabetes. This discrepancy underscores the need to implement targeted healthcare policies and interventions, designed specifically with racial and ethnic factors in mind. Moreover, it illuminates the necessity of raising awareness about diabetes risk factors within the African Caribbean community to encourage better lifestyle habits and early detection. By threading together this facet of race into the tapestry of diabetes statistics, we cultivate a richer and more nuanced understanding of the disease landscape within the UK.

In Canada, First Nations adults are 3 to 5 times more likely than non-Aboriginal adults to be diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.

Spotlighting the disparity between diabetes inflection rates among First Nations adults compared to non-Aboriginal adults in Canada is pivotal in a blog post about Diabetes Race Statistics. It underscores the stark racial health inequities prevalent amidst diverse populations, accentuating the need for structured interventions and health policies to counteract these imbalances. By noting that First Nations adults are at a 3 to 5 times greater risk of being diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, emphasis is placed on a systemic issue that invites further exploration into the interconnected factors like genetic predisposition, environmental influences, diet and lifestyle choices, access to healthcare services, and more. Understanding these differentials in prevalence paves the way towards a more equitable health care system and, ultimately, improved outcomes for diabetes management.

In Australia, the prevalence of self-reported, doctor-diagnosed diabetes is three times higher among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people than non-Indigenous people.

Highlighting such compelling figures as Australia’s prevalence of self-reported, doctor-diagnosed diabetes tripling among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in comparison to their non-Indigenous counterparts provides a vivid illustration of the profound disparities in health outcomes often tied to racial and ethnic lines. Embedded within this numerical narrative are the systemic health inequities that disproportionately impact Indigenous communities, which serve as a call to action for policymakers, health professionals, and society at large. Thus, this data point illuminates the urgent need for targeted interventions and strategic health policies that address these differences in our blog post about Diabetes Race Statistics.

Conclusion

The evaluation of diabetes-race statistics uncovers significant disparities among different racial and ethnic groups. The notably higher prevalence rate among Hispanic, African American, and Native American populations compared to Caucasian populations requires urgent attention. It is pivotal that government agencies, healthcare providers, and community-based organizations foster a collaborative approach to understand the factors driving these disparities, design effective preventive strategies and interventions, and ultimately, eliminate the racial and ethnic inequalities in diabetes incidence.

References

0. – https://www.www.diabetes.org

1. – https://www.www.diabetes.co.uk

2. – https://www.www.aihw.gov.au

3. – https://www.jamanetwork.com

4. – https://www.minorityhealth.hhs.gov

5. – https://www.care.diabetesjournals.org

6. – https://www.www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

7. – https://www.www.cdc.gov

8. – https://www.www.canada.ca

9. – https://www.www.ihs.gov

FAQs

Which racial or ethnic groups are most affected by diabetes in the United States?

Based on data from the American Diabetes Association, diabetes is most prevalent among American Indians/Alaskan Natives (14.7%), followed by non-Hispanic Black individuals (11.7%), Hispanics (12.5%), Asian Americans (9.2%), and non-Hispanic Whites (7.5%).

Are there significant differences in type 2 diabetes incidence between racial groups?

Yes, there are significant differences. Certain racial and ethnic groups such as African Americans, Native Americans, Hispanic Americans, and Asian Americans have a higher risk and incidence rate of developing type 2 diabetes compared to non-Hispanic Whites.

Why are some racial groups more disproportionately affected by diabetes?

Various factors contribute to this disparity, including genetic predisposition, dietary habits, physical activity levels, socioeconomic status, and access to healthcare services. However, more research is needed to fully understand the complex interplay of these factors.

Does race or ethnicity influence the complications and management of diabetes?

Studies suggest that race and ethnicity can influence diabetes complications and management. For instance, minority groups often have higher rates of diabetes-related complications, partly due to disparities in access to quality diabetes care and management resources.

How can we reduce racial disparities in diabetes prevalence and management?

Addressing racial disparities in diabetes involves multiple strategies. These include efforts to improve access to quality healthcare and diabetes education, promoting healthy lifestyle changes, implementing community-based interventions tailored to specific racial or ethnic groups, and conducting further research to better understand the underlying causes of these disparities.

How we write our statistic reports:

We have not conducted any studies ourselves. Our article provides a summary of all the statistics and studies available at the time of writing. We are solely presenting a summary, not expressing our own opinion. We have collected all statistics within our internal database. In some cases, we use Artificial Intelligence for formulating the statistics. The articles are updated regularly.

See our Editorial Process.

Table of Contents

... Before You Leave, Catch This! 🔥

Your next business insight is just a subscription away. Our newsletter The Week in Data delivers the freshest statistics and trends directly to you. Stay informed, stay ahead—subscribe now.

Sign up for our newsletter and become the navigator of tomorrow's trends. Equip your strategy with unparalleled insights!