GITNUXREPORT 2025

Conduct Disorder Statistics

Conduct Disorder affects children, linked to genetics, environment, and early intervention.

Jannik Linder

Co-Founder of Gitnux, specialized in content and tech since 2016.

First published: April 29, 2025

Our Commitment to Accuracy

Rigorous fact-checking • Reputable sources • Regular updatesLearn more

Statistic 1

Up to 50% of youth with Conduct Disorder also meet criteria for Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD)

Statistic 2

Comorbid conditions such as ADHD are present in over 50% of children with Conduct Disorder

Statistic 3

Conduct Disorder is associated with increased risk of substance abuse, with up to 70% of juvenile offenders using drugs

Statistic 4

Conduct Disorder often co-occurs with learning disabilities, affecting up to 35% of affected youth

Statistic 5

Substance use disorder co-occurs in approximately 60-80% of adolescents with Conduct Disorder, increasing health and legal risks

Statistic 6

Up to 25% of adolescents with Conduct Disorder are diagnosed with comorbid anxiety disorders, complicating treatment

Statistic 7

Conduct Disorder is associated with higher utilization of emergency services among youth, reflecting behavioral crises

Statistic 8

Conduct Disorder is associated with impairments in language and communication skills in some cases, which can hinder social integration

Statistic 9

Conduct Disorder is more prevalent among males, with male-to-female ratios ranging from 3:1 to 4:1

Statistic 10

Boys diagnosed with Conduct Disorder are more likely to engage in physical aggression, while girls tend to display relational aggression

Statistic 11

Boys are more likely to display overt behaviors such as aggression, whereas girls may exhibit covert behaviors like lying and theft, associated with Conduct Disorder

Statistic 12

Research suggests that boys with Conduct Disorder are more likely to engage in physical violence, while girls tend toward relational aggression, with differences in underlying neurobiology

Statistic 13

Boys with Conduct Disorder are more likely to display overt aggression, whereas girls tend to show relational aggression and deceitful behaviors, presenting different treatment challenges

Statistic 14

Gender differences in Conduct Disorder manifestation suggest tailored intervention approaches, with boys more aggressive and girls more relational in their antisocial behaviors

Statistic 15

Delinquent girls with Conduct Disorder are more likely to engage in relational aggression and social manipulation compared to boys, who are more prone to physical violence

Statistic 16

Early intervention in Conduct Disorder can reduce the risk of later antisocial behavior by up to 60%

Statistic 17

Treatment effectiveness for Conduct Disorder varies, but multi-modal approaches can lead to symptom reduction in approximately 50-70% of cases

Statistic 18

The use of psychotropic medication in treating Conduct Disorder is controversial; some studies show modest improvements, but evidence for long-term benefit is limited

Statistic 19

Family-based therapies, such as Multisystemic Therapy, have demonstrated success rates of up to 75% in reducing Conduct Disorder symptoms in adolescents

Statistic 20

Family-based early intervention programs can reduce the severity of Conduct Disorder symptoms by up to 50% when implemented before adolescence

Statistic 21

Conduct Disorder can lead to academic underachievement, with affected students averaging lower grades and higher dropout rates compared to peers

Statistic 22

Conduct Disorder affects approximately 2-10% of children and adolescents worldwide

Statistic 23

Approximately 60% of juvenile offenders diagnosed with Conduct Disorder reoffend within three years

Statistic 24

The median age of onset for Conduct Disorder is 11 years, with some cases beginning as early as age 5

Statistic 25

Adolescents with Conduct Disorder are significantly more likely to drop out of school, with rates up to 70% in some studies

Statistic 26

The prevalence of Conduct Disorder among detained youth can reach up to 90%

Statistic 27

Conduct Disorder in childhood increases the risk of later criminal behavior, with approximately 40% of juvenile delinquents having a history of it

Statistic 28

The global burden of disease study estimates that mental health disorders, including Conduct Disorder, account for 3-4% of the total disease burden in children and adolescents

Statistic 29

Conduct Disorder is often preceded by Oppositional Defiant Disorder in many cases, with transition rates around 50%

Statistic 30

The lifetime prevalence of Conduct Disorder is estimated at approximately 4%, with some variation depending on diagnostic criteria

Statistic 31

Conduct Disorder contributes significantly to juvenile detention and incarceration rates worldwide, accounting for an estimated 70-80% of juvenile offenders

Statistic 32

The rate of Conduct Disorder is approximately twice as high in urban areas compared to rural zones, likely due to sociocultural factors

Statistic 33

Rates of Conduct Disorder have shown slight declines in some regions due to increased awareness and intervention programs, but remain a prevalent concern worldwide

Statistic 34

Conduct Disorder is associated with a higher risk of developing antisocial personality disorder in adulthood, with estimates around 50%

Statistic 35

Genetic factors account for approximately 50% of the risk for Conduct Disorder

Statistic 36

Environmental factors such as family conflict, neglect, and exposure to violence are strongly associated with Conduct Disorder

Statistic 37

The probability of developing Conduct Disorder is higher among children with a family history of antisocial behavior

Statistic 38

The risk of developing Conduct Disorder is higher in urban environments compared to rural areas

Statistic 39

Socioeconomic disadvantage is a significant predictor of Conduct Disorder, with higher prevalence rates in low-income populations

Statistic 40

Children with Conduct Disorder often show deficits in executive functioning, particularly in impulse control and emotional regulation

Statistic 41

The presence of harsh, inconsistent parenting is associated with increased risk of Conduct Disorder, as per multiple longitudinal studies

Statistic 42

Conduct Disorder is diagnosed more frequently in children and adolescents who experience family instability, including divorce or separation

Statistic 43

Neuroimaging studies have identified structural differences in the amygdala and prefrontal cortex of youth with Conduct Disorder, indicating irregularities in emotional processing and judgment

Statistic 44

Rates of Conduct Disorder are higher among indigenous and minority youth populations, often due to social and economic disparities

Statistic 45

Early childhood behavioral issues are strong predictors of later Conduct Disorder, emphasizing the importance of early detection

Statistic 46

Children with Conduct Disorder often experience peer rejection, which can exacerbate behavioral problems and social isolation

Statistic 47

In several studies, up to 80% of youth with Conduct Disorder had a history of exposure to violence or abuse, highlighting environmental risk factors

Statistic 48

Kids with Conduct Disorder often exhibit callous-unemotional traits, which are linked to more severe, persistent antisocial behavior

Statistic 49

Parental monitoring and positive reinforcement are protective factors that reduce the risk of Conduct Disorder development, according to behavioral research

Statistic 50

The socioeconomic status of a child's family is a significant predictor, with children in low-income families at higher risk for developing Conduct Disorder

Statistic 51

In longitudinal studies, early Conduct Disorder symptoms often predict adult antisocial and criminal behavior into the 30s and 40s

Statistic 52

Children with Conduct Disorder frequently exhibit impairments in moral reasoning and empathy, which are linked to the severity of their antisocial behaviors

Statistic 53

Peer influence plays a substantial role in Conduct Disorder development, with association to peer delinquent groups increasing the risk

Statistic 54

Adolescents with Conduct Disorder are significantly more likely to be involved in risky behaviors such as unsafe sex and reckless driving, contributing to injury and health risks

Statistic 55

Mental health stigma and lack of access to services contribute to underdiagnosis and undertreatment of Conduct Disorder in various populations, especially in developing countries

Statistic 56

Conduct Disorder prevalence rates are higher among children exposed to prenatal substance abuse and maternal stress, emphasizing the impact of early developmental environments

Statistic 57

Protective factors, including stable relationships, academic success, and community engagement, are associated with reduced risk of Conduct Disorder symptoms, according to epidemiological studies

Statistic 58

Conduct Disorder has a significant economic impact due to increased healthcare costs, juvenile justice expenses, and lost productivity, estimated globally at billions annually

Slide 1 of 58

Sources

Our Reports have been cited by:

Trust Badges - Publications that have cited our reports

Key Highlights

Conduct Disorder affects approximately 2-10% of children and adolescents worldwide
Up to 50% of youth with Conduct Disorder also meet criteria for Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD)
Conduct Disorder is more prevalent among males, with male-to-female ratios ranging from 3:1 to 4:1
Approximately 60% of juvenile offenders diagnosed with Conduct Disorder reoffend within three years
Conduct Disorder is associated with a higher risk of developing antisocial personality disorder in adulthood, with estimates around 50%
The median age of onset for Conduct Disorder is 11 years, with some cases beginning as early as age 5
Genetic factors account for approximately 50% of the risk for Conduct Disorder
Environmental factors such as family conflict, neglect, and exposure to violence are strongly associated with Conduct Disorder
Comorbid conditions such as ADHD are present in over 50% of children with Conduct Disorder
Adolescents with Conduct Disorder are significantly more likely to drop out of school, with rates up to 70% in some studies
The prevalence of Conduct Disorder among detained youth can reach up to 90%
Early intervention in Conduct Disorder can reduce the risk of later antisocial behavior by up to 60%
Treatment effectiveness for Conduct Disorder varies, but multi-modal approaches can lead to symptom reduction in approximately 50-70% of cases

Conduct Disorder affects up to 10% of youth worldwide and is associated with long-term behavioral, social, and legal challenges, making early detection and intervention crucial to altering its devastating trajectory.

Comorbid Conditions and Co-occurring Disorders

Up to 50% of youth with Conduct Disorder also meet criteria for Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD)
Comorbid conditions such as ADHD are present in over 50% of children with Conduct Disorder
Conduct Disorder is associated with increased risk of substance abuse, with up to 70% of juvenile offenders using drugs
Conduct Disorder often co-occurs with learning disabilities, affecting up to 35% of affected youth
Substance use disorder co-occurs in approximately 60-80% of adolescents with Conduct Disorder, increasing health and legal risks
Up to 25% of adolescents with Conduct Disorder are diagnosed with comorbid anxiety disorders, complicating treatment
Conduct Disorder is associated with higher utilization of emergency services among youth, reflecting behavioral crises
Conduct Disorder is associated with impairments in language and communication skills in some cases, which can hinder social integration

Comorbid Conditions and Co-occurring Disorders Interpretation

The stark statistics reveal that Conduct Disorder not only intertwines heavily with oppositional, attentional, and learning challenges but also amplifies risks like substance abuse and legal troubles, highlighting the urgent need for comprehensive, multi-faceted intervention strategies.

Gender and Demographic Differences

Conduct Disorder is more prevalent among males, with male-to-female ratios ranging from 3:1 to 4:1
Boys diagnosed with Conduct Disorder are more likely to engage in physical aggression, while girls tend to display relational aggression
Boys are more likely to display overt behaviors such as aggression, whereas girls may exhibit covert behaviors like lying and theft, associated with Conduct Disorder
Research suggests that boys with Conduct Disorder are more likely to engage in physical violence, while girls tend toward relational aggression, with differences in underlying neurobiology
Boys with Conduct Disorder are more likely to display overt aggression, whereas girls tend to show relational aggression and deceitful behaviors, presenting different treatment challenges
Gender differences in Conduct Disorder manifestation suggest tailored intervention approaches, with boys more aggressive and girls more relational in their antisocial behaviors
Delinquent girls with Conduct Disorder are more likely to engage in relational aggression and social manipulation compared to boys, who are more prone to physical violence

Gender and Demographic Differences Interpretation

While Conduct Disorder overwhelmingly favors male prevalence and overt aggression, its subtler relational and deceitful counterparts in girls underscore the necessity for gender-sensitive diagnosis and intervention strategies to effectively address underlying neurobiological and behavioral differences.

Interventions, Outcomes, and Societal Impact

Early intervention in Conduct Disorder can reduce the risk of later antisocial behavior by up to 60%
Treatment effectiveness for Conduct Disorder varies, but multi-modal approaches can lead to symptom reduction in approximately 50-70% of cases
The use of psychotropic medication in treating Conduct Disorder is controversial; some studies show modest improvements, but evidence for long-term benefit is limited
Family-based therapies, such as Multisystemic Therapy, have demonstrated success rates of up to 75% in reducing Conduct Disorder symptoms in adolescents
Family-based early intervention programs can reduce the severity of Conduct Disorder symptoms by up to 50% when implemented before adolescence

Interventions, Outcomes, and Societal Impact Interpretation

While early, family-focused, and multi-modal interventions can collectively cut the risk of lifelong antisocial conduct by over half, the debate over pharmacological approaches persists, underscoring that a nuanced, multi-layered strategy remains our most promising weapon against Conduct Disorder.

Outcomes, and Societal Impact

Conduct Disorder can lead to academic underachievement, with affected students averaging lower grades and higher dropout rates compared to peers

Outcomes, and Societal Impact Interpretation

Conduct Disorder not only hampers behavior but also stealthily undermines academic success, leaving affected students languishing in lower grades and higher dropout rates, a stark reminder that discipline issues often carry far-reaching consequences.

Prevalence and Epidemiology

Conduct Disorder affects approximately 2-10% of children and adolescents worldwide
Approximately 60% of juvenile offenders diagnosed with Conduct Disorder reoffend within three years
The median age of onset for Conduct Disorder is 11 years, with some cases beginning as early as age 5
Adolescents with Conduct Disorder are significantly more likely to drop out of school, with rates up to 70% in some studies
The prevalence of Conduct Disorder among detained youth can reach up to 90%
Conduct Disorder in childhood increases the risk of later criminal behavior, with approximately 40% of juvenile delinquents having a history of it
The global burden of disease study estimates that mental health disorders, including Conduct Disorder, account for 3-4% of the total disease burden in children and adolescents
Conduct Disorder is often preceded by Oppositional Defiant Disorder in many cases, with transition rates around 50%
The lifetime prevalence of Conduct Disorder is estimated at approximately 4%, with some variation depending on diagnostic criteria
Conduct Disorder contributes significantly to juvenile detention and incarceration rates worldwide, accounting for an estimated 70-80% of juvenile offenders
The rate of Conduct Disorder is approximately twice as high in urban areas compared to rural zones, likely due to sociocultural factors
Rates of Conduct Disorder have shown slight declines in some regions due to increased awareness and intervention programs, but remain a prevalent concern worldwide

Prevalence and Epidemiology Interpretation

While affecting up to 10% of youth globally and heavily burdening juvenile justice systems—especially in urban areas—Conduct Disorder's early onset, high reoffense rates, and links to academic dropout underscore the urgent need for targeted early intervention, lest we unwittingly pass the disorder from childhood into a lifetime of costly consequences.

Risk Factors and Origins

Conduct Disorder is associated with a higher risk of developing antisocial personality disorder in adulthood, with estimates around 50%
Genetic factors account for approximately 50% of the risk for Conduct Disorder
Environmental factors such as family conflict, neglect, and exposure to violence are strongly associated with Conduct Disorder
The probability of developing Conduct Disorder is higher among children with a family history of antisocial behavior
The risk of developing Conduct Disorder is higher in urban environments compared to rural areas
Socioeconomic disadvantage is a significant predictor of Conduct Disorder, with higher prevalence rates in low-income populations
Children with Conduct Disorder often show deficits in executive functioning, particularly in impulse control and emotional regulation
The presence of harsh, inconsistent parenting is associated with increased risk of Conduct Disorder, as per multiple longitudinal studies
Conduct Disorder is diagnosed more frequently in children and adolescents who experience family instability, including divorce or separation
Neuroimaging studies have identified structural differences in the amygdala and prefrontal cortex of youth with Conduct Disorder, indicating irregularities in emotional processing and judgment
Rates of Conduct Disorder are higher among indigenous and minority youth populations, often due to social and economic disparities
Early childhood behavioral issues are strong predictors of later Conduct Disorder, emphasizing the importance of early detection
Children with Conduct Disorder often experience peer rejection, which can exacerbate behavioral problems and social isolation
In several studies, up to 80% of youth with Conduct Disorder had a history of exposure to violence or abuse, highlighting environmental risk factors
Kids with Conduct Disorder often exhibit callous-unemotional traits, which are linked to more severe, persistent antisocial behavior
Parental monitoring and positive reinforcement are protective factors that reduce the risk of Conduct Disorder development, according to behavioral research
The socioeconomic status of a child's family is a significant predictor, with children in low-income families at higher risk for developing Conduct Disorder
In longitudinal studies, early Conduct Disorder symptoms often predict adult antisocial and criminal behavior into the 30s and 40s
Children with Conduct Disorder frequently exhibit impairments in moral reasoning and empathy, which are linked to the severity of their antisocial behaviors
Peer influence plays a substantial role in Conduct Disorder development, with association to peer delinquent groups increasing the risk
Adolescents with Conduct Disorder are significantly more likely to be involved in risky behaviors such as unsafe sex and reckless driving, contributing to injury and health risks
Mental health stigma and lack of access to services contribute to underdiagnosis and undertreatment of Conduct Disorder in various populations, especially in developing countries
Conduct Disorder prevalence rates are higher among children exposed to prenatal substance abuse and maternal stress, emphasizing the impact of early developmental environments
Protective factors, including stable relationships, academic success, and community engagement, are associated with reduced risk of Conduct Disorder symptoms, according to epidemiological studies

Risk Factors and Origins Interpretation

Conduct Disorder, a complex interplay of genetics, environment, and social factors—ranging from neurobiological differences to family instability—serves as both a warning sign and a predictor of serious adult antisocial behavior, illustrating that early intervention and protective influences are essential to prevent a lifelong trajectory of misconduct and societal impact.

Societal Impact

Conduct Disorder has a significant economic impact due to increased healthcare costs, juvenile justice expenses, and lost productivity, estimated globally at billions annually

Societal Impact Interpretation

While Conduct Disorder's staggering global price tag of billions underscores its serious societal toll, it also highlights the urgent need for preventative strategies that can save both lives and economic resources.