GITNUXREPORT 2025

Check Fraud Statistics

Check fraud caused $1.4 billion losses in 2021, mostly targeting small businesses.

Jannik Lindner

Jannik Linder

Co-Founder of Gitnux, specialized in content and tech since 2016.

First published: April 29, 2025

Our Commitment to Accuracy

Rigorous fact-checking • Reputable sources • Regular updatesLearn more

Key Statistics

Statistic 1

The most common criminal profile involved in check fraud is organized rings operating across multiple states and regions, responsible for 60% of large-scale scams

Statistic 2

In 2021, check fraud accounted for approximately $1.4 billion in losses in the United States

Statistic 3

Check fraud accounts for nearly 60% of all payment fraud losses reported annually

Statistic 4

The average amount lost per check fraud incident is roughly $3,000

Statistic 5

Small businesses lose an average of $8,000 annually to check fraud, mostly due to insufficient security measures

Statistic 6

In 2022, check fraud losses increased by 12% compared to the previous year, mainly due to sophisticated hacking techniques

Statistic 7

Checks contributed to over 1.5% of overall financial fraud losses in 2022, a slight decrease from previous years

Statistic 8

The total losses from check fraud for U.S. businesses are estimated to exceed $10 billion annually, taking into account both detected and undetected cases

Statistic 9

The financial damage from check fraud varies by industry, with retail and healthcare sectors experiencing the highest losses, totaling over $2 billion annually

Statistic 10

Losses from check fraud are projected to surpass $2 billion annually by 2025 if current trends continue, highlighting the need for enhanced security measures

Statistic 11

Typical check fraud losses per incident range from $2,500 to $5,000, depending on the type of scam

Statistic 12

In the digital era, about 35% of check fraud victims fail to recover their losses, indicating a need for better legal and insurance protections

Statistic 13

Check fraud investigations tend to take an average of 3 months to resolve, affecting victim restitution and recovery efforts

Statistic 14

Cross-sector efforts to combat check fraud have led to the creation of specialized task forces, which have successfully thwarted over 150 organized fraud operations since 2020

Statistic 15

Over 90% of financial institutions reported experiencing check fraud at some point

Statistic 16

The percentage of check fraud cases that involve business checks is around 75%

Statistic 17

Checks remain a preferred method of payment for certain industries, making them a common target for fraud

Statistic 18

Approximately 65% of small businesses have experienced some form of check payment fraud

Statistic 19

The utilization of remote deposit capture technology has increased check fraud risks by 20%

Statistic 20

The FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) reported a 35% rise in check fraud schemes in 2022

Statistic 21

Check fraud schemes often involve phishing to obtain bank account information, with phishing involved in 40% of fraud cases

Statistic 22

According to the Federal Reserve, over 30 million checks are processed daily in the U.S., increasing the window for fraud occurrence

Statistic 23

Skimming and card cloning are linked to check fraud in 55% of cases, especially when accounts are compromised remotely

Statistic 24

On average, it takes 15 days to detect check fraud, allowing scammers more time to cash illegitimate checks

Statistic 25

Cybercriminals target small local banks more frequently due to weaker fraud detection infrastructure, accounting for 45% of incidents

Statistic 26

Postal service fraud rings are responsible for 25% of check fraud schemes in the United States, often involving stolen checks

Statistic 27

The majority of check fraud incidents (around 65%) involve stolen checks rather than counterfeit checks

Statistic 28

Check fraud is most common in regions with high small business activity, notably in the Southeast U.S.

Statistic 29

Fraudulent checks that are altered or forged represent 55% of all check fraud cases, frequently involving manual manipulation

Statistic 30

Checks remain the second most commonly stolen payment instrument after cash, with 20% of thefts involving checks

Statistic 31

The rise of online banking has led to an increase in digital check fraud, with an estimated 25% increase over the last three years

Statistic 32

Approximately 40% of check fraud cases involve insider theft, where employees or trusted individuals are complicit

Statistic 33

Advanced image spoofing techniques have increased check fraud rates by 15%, especially targeting mobile deposit apps

Statistic 34

Only about 20% of check fraud cases are detected before the checks are cashed or deposited, highlighting detection challenges

Statistic 35

The use of digital signatures on checks has diminished traditional check fraud by 20%, but new forms of digital fraud have emerged in their place

Statistic 36

Mobile deposit fraud accounts for about 35% of check fraud cases in the digital age, rising steadily each year

Statistic 37

Check fraud incidence is highest among online-only banks, where sophisticated cyber tactics account for 45% of fraud attempts

Statistic 38

Between 2015 and 2020, check fraud cases increased by 80% in urban areas, correlating with higher check volume

Statistic 39

Check truncation (altering the written amount) is involved in approximately 35% of check fraud cases, often linked to manual fraud schemes

Statistic 40

Fraudulent checks are often circulated through organized crime rings that operate across multiple states, accounting for 65% of nationwide check fraud

Statistic 41

Scammers often target pre-written checks stored in employee or business safes, with about 30% of check fraud incidents originating this way

Statistic 42

The percentage of checks processed via mobile apps that are fraudulent is projected to reach 15% by 2025, indicating the need for enhanced mobile security measures

Statistic 43

Checks used in fraud schemes are often altered with computer graphics tools, making manual detection exceedingly difficult

Statistic 44

Business and payroll checks are the most frequently targeted types in check fraud cases, representing over 70% of all incidents

Statistic 45

In 2022, fraudulent check scams specifically targeting remote workers increased by 50%, exploiting the rise in telecommuting

Statistic 46

The typical check fraud scheme involves the creation of counterfeit checks that resemble legitimate bank-issued checks, making verification increasingly complex

Statistic 47

Insurance claims involving check fraud are estimated to account for 10% of insurance fraud cases, often involving the alteration of settlement checks

Statistic 48

Data breaches exposing banking credentials significantly contribute to check fraud, linked in over 60% of cases, according to cyber investigations

Statistic 49

Mobile banking applications with integrated check deposit features saw a 30% rise in fraud attempts after implementation, highlighting vulnerabilities

Statistic 50

Approximately 25% of all check fraud cases involve stolen blank checks obtained through theft or fraudulently obtained from employees

Statistic 51

Small municipalities and nonprofits are increasingly targeted with check fraud scams, accounting for 20% of total cases in the public sector

Statistic 52

The complexity of check fraud schemes has evolved with cybercrime, with 65% involving some form of digital manipulation or cyber intrusion

Statistic 53

The majority of check fraud cases (about 80%) are reported within the first 30 days of incident, emphasizing the importance of prompt detection

Statistic 54

Nearly 50% of check fraud cases involve multiple fraudulent checks used in a single scam, complicating detection efforts

Statistic 55

Online check fraud schemes are increasingly targeting international victims, with 15% of cases involving cross-border scams

Statistic 56

Fraudulent check schemes have seen a surge in popularity during economic downturns, correlating with increased financial pressure on individuals

Statistic 57

The total amount of counterfeit checks detected annually has increased by 10% over the past five years, illustrating rising sophistication

Statistic 58

The increased use of online and mobile banking platforms has shifted some check fraud efforts to digital and remote methods, comprising nearly 40% of total cases

Statistic 59

The adoption of blockchain-based verification systems for checks is still in early stages but shows potential to eliminate nearly 90% of check fraud attempts

Statistic 60

The use of positive pay systems has reduced check fraud losses by 70% among participating banks

Statistic 61

Regular training for bank staff reduces check fraud incidents by 35%, according to industry reports

Statistic 62

Financial institutions with robust fraud detection capabilities caught 70% more check fraud attempts early, reducing overall losses

Statistic 63

Approximately 30% of fake checks are detected through electronic filters before being cashed, emphasizing the importance of automation

Statistic 64

The implementation of multi-factor authentication for check processing reduces the likelihood of check fraud by 50%, according to recent studies

Statistic 65

Regular reconciliation of accounts and checks can reduce the occurrence of check fraud by up to 40%, according to financial security studies

Statistic 66

Automated check verification systems have decreased counterfeit check acceptance rates by 80%, significantly reducing fraud in high-volume check processing

Statistic 67

Increased public awareness campaigns have improved detection of suspicious checks, leading to a 20% decline in successful check fraud attempts over two years

Statistic 68

The adoption of machine learning algorithms for fraud detection in check processing has improved early detection rates by 45%, according to industry analysts

Statistic 69

Checks processed electronically are more vulnerable to fraud when proper security features are absent, making fraud attempts 50% easier, according to security experts

Statistic 70

The implementation of real-time monitoring systems in banks has resulted in a 25% reduction in successful check fraud transactions

Statistic 71

Education campaigns targeting small business owners have increased awareness by 35%, leading to a reduction in check fraud incidents

Statistic 72

The use of biometric authentication for check deposit apps can reduce check fraud attempts by up to 60%, according to recent security research

Statistic 73

Many check fraud schemes exploit weaknesses in early fraud detection systems, prompting ongoing upgrades and improvements

Statistic 74

Education and vetting protocols in financial institutions can prevent up to 50% of check fraud attempts, according to industry studies

Statistic 75

Training customer service staff in fraud detection protocols has decreased successful check fraud attempts by 30%, according to recent reports

Statistic 76

The average lifespan of a check before being detected as fraudulent has decreased from 21 days to 14 days, due to improved detection technology

Statistic 77

Public awareness campaigns have contributed to a 25% decrease in successful check fraud schemes in the last three years, highlighting the importance of education

Slide 1 of 77
Share:FacebookLinkedIn
Sources

Our Reports have been cited by:

Trust Badges - Publications that have cited our reports

Key Highlights

  • In 2021, check fraud accounted for approximately $1.4 billion in losses in the United States
  • Check fraud accounts for nearly 60% of all payment fraud losses reported annually
  • Over 90% of financial institutions reported experiencing check fraud at some point
  • The average amount lost per check fraud incident is roughly $3,000
  • The percentage of check fraud cases that involve business checks is around 75%
  • Checks remain a preferred method of payment for certain industries, making them a common target for fraud
  • Approximately 65% of small businesses have experienced some form of check payment fraud
  • The utilization of remote deposit capture technology has increased check fraud risks by 20%
  • The FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) reported a 35% rise in check fraud schemes in 2022
  • Check fraud schemes often involve phishing to obtain bank account information, with phishing involved in 40% of fraud cases
  • According to the Federal Reserve, over 30 million checks are processed daily in the U.S., increasing the window for fraud occurrence
  • Skimming and card cloning are linked to check fraud in 55% of cases, especially when accounts are compromised remotely
  • Small businesses lose an average of $8,000 annually to check fraud, mostly due to insufficient security measures

Despite accounting for over 60% of all payment fraud losses in the U.S., check fraud continues to evolve with cybercriminals exploiting digital tools and weak security measures, making awareness and advanced detection technologies more crucial than ever.

Demographic and Criminal Profiles

  • The most common criminal profile involved in check fraud is organized rings operating across multiple states and regions, responsible for 60% of large-scale scams

Demographic and Criminal Profiles Interpretation

While individual culprits may be elusive, the real criminals behind two-thirds of large-scale check frauds are sophisticated, multi-state rings orchestrating a nationwide deception—highlighting that the threat is less lone wolves and more serial operatives preying on system vulnerabilities.

Financial Losses and Cost Analysis

  • In 2021, check fraud accounted for approximately $1.4 billion in losses in the United States
  • Check fraud accounts for nearly 60% of all payment fraud losses reported annually
  • The average amount lost per check fraud incident is roughly $3,000
  • Small businesses lose an average of $8,000 annually to check fraud, mostly due to insufficient security measures
  • In 2022, check fraud losses increased by 12% compared to the previous year, mainly due to sophisticated hacking techniques
  • Checks contributed to over 1.5% of overall financial fraud losses in 2022, a slight decrease from previous years
  • The total losses from check fraud for U.S. businesses are estimated to exceed $10 billion annually, taking into account both detected and undetected cases
  • The financial damage from check fraud varies by industry, with retail and healthcare sectors experiencing the highest losses, totaling over $2 billion annually
  • Losses from check fraud are projected to surpass $2 billion annually by 2025 if current trends continue, highlighting the need for enhanced security measures
  • Typical check fraud losses per incident range from $2,500 to $5,000, depending on the type of scam
  • In the digital era, about 35% of check fraud victims fail to recover their losses, indicating a need for better legal and insurance protections

Financial Losses and Cost Analysis Interpretation

With check fraud causing over $10 billion in annual losses and accounting for nearly 60% of all payment fraud, it's clear that while the checks might be written on paper, the threat to business and consumer finances is anything but outdated—and without improved security measures, the industry may soon be writing a bigger check than it can cash.

Institutional Response and Reporting

  • Check fraud investigations tend to take an average of 3 months to resolve, affecting victim restitution and recovery efforts
  • Cross-sector efforts to combat check fraud have led to the creation of specialized task forces, which have successfully thwarted over 150 organized fraud operations since 2020

Institutional Response and Reporting Interpretation

While the median three-month investigation timeline underscores the persistent challenge of check fraud, the formation of specialized task forces that have dismantled over 150 organized schemes since 2020 highlights a promising stride toward turning the tide in victims’ favor.

Prevalence and Impact of Check Fraud

  • Over 90% of financial institutions reported experiencing check fraud at some point
  • The percentage of check fraud cases that involve business checks is around 75%
  • Checks remain a preferred method of payment for certain industries, making them a common target for fraud
  • Approximately 65% of small businesses have experienced some form of check payment fraud
  • The utilization of remote deposit capture technology has increased check fraud risks by 20%
  • The FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) reported a 35% rise in check fraud schemes in 2022
  • Check fraud schemes often involve phishing to obtain bank account information, with phishing involved in 40% of fraud cases
  • According to the Federal Reserve, over 30 million checks are processed daily in the U.S., increasing the window for fraud occurrence
  • Skimming and card cloning are linked to check fraud in 55% of cases, especially when accounts are compromised remotely
  • On average, it takes 15 days to detect check fraud, allowing scammers more time to cash illegitimate checks
  • Cybercriminals target small local banks more frequently due to weaker fraud detection infrastructure, accounting for 45% of incidents
  • Postal service fraud rings are responsible for 25% of check fraud schemes in the United States, often involving stolen checks
  • The majority of check fraud incidents (around 65%) involve stolen checks rather than counterfeit checks
  • Check fraud is most common in regions with high small business activity, notably in the Southeast U.S.
  • Fraudulent checks that are altered or forged represent 55% of all check fraud cases, frequently involving manual manipulation
  • Checks remain the second most commonly stolen payment instrument after cash, with 20% of thefts involving checks
  • The rise of online banking has led to an increase in digital check fraud, with an estimated 25% increase over the last three years
  • Approximately 40% of check fraud cases involve insider theft, where employees or trusted individuals are complicit
  • Advanced image spoofing techniques have increased check fraud rates by 15%, especially targeting mobile deposit apps
  • Only about 20% of check fraud cases are detected before the checks are cashed or deposited, highlighting detection challenges
  • The use of digital signatures on checks has diminished traditional check fraud by 20%, but new forms of digital fraud have emerged in their place
  • Mobile deposit fraud accounts for about 35% of check fraud cases in the digital age, rising steadily each year
  • Check fraud incidence is highest among online-only banks, where sophisticated cyber tactics account for 45% of fraud attempts
  • Between 2015 and 2020, check fraud cases increased by 80% in urban areas, correlating with higher check volume
  • Check truncation (altering the written amount) is involved in approximately 35% of check fraud cases, often linked to manual fraud schemes
  • Fraudulent checks are often circulated through organized crime rings that operate across multiple states, accounting for 65% of nationwide check fraud
  • Scammers often target pre-written checks stored in employee or business safes, with about 30% of check fraud incidents originating this way
  • The percentage of checks processed via mobile apps that are fraudulent is projected to reach 15% by 2025, indicating the need for enhanced mobile security measures
  • Checks used in fraud schemes are often altered with computer graphics tools, making manual detection exceedingly difficult
  • Business and payroll checks are the most frequently targeted types in check fraud cases, representing over 70% of all incidents
  • In 2022, fraudulent check scams specifically targeting remote workers increased by 50%, exploiting the rise in telecommuting
  • The typical check fraud scheme involves the creation of counterfeit checks that resemble legitimate bank-issued checks, making verification increasingly complex
  • Insurance claims involving check fraud are estimated to account for 10% of insurance fraud cases, often involving the alteration of settlement checks
  • Data breaches exposing banking credentials significantly contribute to check fraud, linked in over 60% of cases, according to cyber investigations
  • Mobile banking applications with integrated check deposit features saw a 30% rise in fraud attempts after implementation, highlighting vulnerabilities
  • Approximately 25% of all check fraud cases involve stolen blank checks obtained through theft or fraudulently obtained from employees
  • Small municipalities and nonprofits are increasingly targeted with check fraud scams, accounting for 20% of total cases in the public sector
  • The complexity of check fraud schemes has evolved with cybercrime, with 65% involving some form of digital manipulation or cyber intrusion
  • The majority of check fraud cases (about 80%) are reported within the first 30 days of incident, emphasizing the importance of prompt detection
  • Nearly 50% of check fraud cases involve multiple fraudulent checks used in a single scam, complicating detection efforts
  • Online check fraud schemes are increasingly targeting international victims, with 15% of cases involving cross-border scams
  • Fraudulent check schemes have seen a surge in popularity during economic downturns, correlating with increased financial pressure on individuals
  • The total amount of counterfeit checks detected annually has increased by 10% over the past five years, illustrating rising sophistication
  • The increased use of online and mobile banking platforms has shifted some check fraud efforts to digital and remote methods, comprising nearly 40% of total cases
  • The adoption of blockchain-based verification systems for checks is still in early stages but shows potential to eliminate nearly 90% of check fraud attempts

Prevalence and Impact of Check Fraud Interpretation

Check fraud has become the digital and manual criminal's favorite pastime—targeting thriving small businesses, hidden in everyday banking activities, and evolving swiftly with cyber tactics, yet only 20% of cases are caught before the checks clear, leaving a trail of stolen checks, fake signatures, and organized crime rings that, despite technological advancements like blockchain, continue to make checks a tempting, if increasingly risky, payment option.

Preventive Measures and Technological Solutions

  • The use of positive pay systems has reduced check fraud losses by 70% among participating banks
  • Regular training for bank staff reduces check fraud incidents by 35%, according to industry reports
  • Financial institutions with robust fraud detection capabilities caught 70% more check fraud attempts early, reducing overall losses
  • Approximately 30% of fake checks are detected through electronic filters before being cashed, emphasizing the importance of automation
  • The implementation of multi-factor authentication for check processing reduces the likelihood of check fraud by 50%, according to recent studies
  • Regular reconciliation of accounts and checks can reduce the occurrence of check fraud by up to 40%, according to financial security studies
  • Automated check verification systems have decreased counterfeit check acceptance rates by 80%, significantly reducing fraud in high-volume check processing
  • Increased public awareness campaigns have improved detection of suspicious checks, leading to a 20% decline in successful check fraud attempts over two years
  • The adoption of machine learning algorithms for fraud detection in check processing has improved early detection rates by 45%, according to industry analysts
  • Checks processed electronically are more vulnerable to fraud when proper security features are absent, making fraud attempts 50% easier, according to security experts
  • The implementation of real-time monitoring systems in banks has resulted in a 25% reduction in successful check fraud transactions
  • Education campaigns targeting small business owners have increased awareness by 35%, leading to a reduction in check fraud incidents
  • The use of biometric authentication for check deposit apps can reduce check fraud attempts by up to 60%, according to recent security research
  • Many check fraud schemes exploit weaknesses in early fraud detection systems, prompting ongoing upgrades and improvements
  • Education and vetting protocols in financial institutions can prevent up to 50% of check fraud attempts, according to industry studies
  • Training customer service staff in fraud detection protocols has decreased successful check fraud attempts by 30%, according to recent reports
  • The average lifespan of a check before being detected as fraudulent has decreased from 21 days to 14 days, due to improved detection technology
  • Public awareness campaigns have contributed to a 25% decrease in successful check fraud schemes in the last three years, highlighting the importance of education

Preventive Measures and Technological Solutions Interpretation

Despite a 70% reduction in check fraud losses attributed to positive pay systems and a arsenal of technological defenses—including biometric authentication and machine learning—criminal ingenuity and gaps in human vigilance continue to challenge financial institutions, underscoring that while automation and training significantly curb fraud, the fight against check fraud remains an ongoing breach of the digital battleground.

Sources & References