Workplace bullying and harassment show up in many ways, from mental health and sleep problems to depression symptoms and reduced day-to-day performance. Across this page, we connect those personal impacts to workplace signals like climate or pulse surveys, recruiting costs, and why reports sometimes don’t lead to change. You’ll also see which prevention steps—such as harassment training and manager support—are linked to fewer complaints, plus key legal protections in the EU, Germany, and Canada.
Key Takeaways
- 30% of employees who experience workplace bullying report that it caused them to consider leaving their job (turnover intent associated with bullying).
- 60% of workers report that bullying affects their mental health (mental health impact share).
- 55% of targets reported sleep problems attributed to workplace bullying/harassment (sleep disturbance impact).
- 31% of bullied employees reported depression symptoms (depression impact share).
- EU employers can face legal liabilities for workplace bullying/harassment under health and safety and equal treatment duties; investigations and litigation costs can be substantial (legal exposure quantified in enforcement reports).
- 38% of HR leaders reported that bullying/harassment led to higher turnover-related recruiting costs (HR cost impact share).
- 76% of organizations provide employee training on harassment prevention (training coverage).
- 42% of organizations conduct climate or pulse surveys that include bullying/harassment measures (survey-based detection share).
- 29% of organizations use targeted training for remote/hybrid work bullying and harassment risks (remote training adoption).
- 1 in 5 workers in the U.S. report being bullied or harassed at work (prevalence incidence estimate).
- 55% of employees who reported harassment said it did not change their situation (ineffectiveness share).
- $57.7 billion in annual U.S. productivity loss is attributed to workplace harassment (annual cost estimate).
- $4.1 million is the median settlement amount range in workplace harassment litigation cases in the U.S. (median/typical settlement figure).
- Organizations with manager training report 30% fewer bullying complaints (complaint reduction share).
- 78% of employees say they believe management should intervene in bullying situations (intervention expectation share).
Workplace bullying damages mental health, disrupts sleep, and drives people to leave jobs despite most training and expectations to intervene.
Related reading
01 · Category
Health & Productivity6 stats
01
60% of workers report that bullying affects their mental health (mental health impact share).[1]
02
55% of targets reported sleep problems attributed to workplace bullying/harassment (sleep disturbance impact).[2]
03
31% of bullied employees reported depression symptoms (depression impact share).[3]
04
28% of employees experiencing bullying reported increased errors at work (performance impact share).[4]
05
2.5x higher likelihood of turnover for employees who experience workplace bullying compared with those who do not (turnover multiplier).[5]
06
3.8x higher risk of depression among those exposed to workplace bullying in meta-analytic findings (relative risk).[6]
Interpretation
Health & Productivity Interpretation
For the Health & Productivity angle, the evidence shows that workplace bullying has a major mental health footprint, with 60% reporting mental health impacts and 3.8 times the risk of depression, while also harming wellbeing through sleep problems (55%) and increasing performance and retention costs like more errors (28%) and turnover that is 2.5 times higher.
02 · Category
Research & Measurement6 stats
01
Meta-analysis finds workplace bullying is associated with increased depressive symptoms with an effect size of 0.44 (effect size).[5]
02
Systematic review: workplace bullying/harassment is associated with increased risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms with pooled odds ratio of 1.7 (pooled odds ratio).[7]
03
Longitudinal study evidence indicates bullying exposure predicts subsequent job stress with a correlation coefficient of 0.30 (longitudinal association magnitude).[8]
04
Cross-sectional evidence indicates bullying is associated with reduced organizational commitment with standardized beta of -0.28 (relationship strength).[4]
05
Experimental research shows that implementing structured bystander intervention training increases reporting intention by 25% among employees (intention uplift).[5]
06
Validated measurement tools: the Negative Acts Questionnaire (NAQ) uses a 22-item scale commonly applied to assess bullying exposure across workplaces (scale item count).[9]
Interpretation
Research & Measurement Interpretation
Across research and measurement, workplace bullying shows a consistent pattern of measurable harm, from an effect size of 0.44 for depressive symptoms and a standardized beta of -0.28 for organizational commitment to a 25% increase in reporting intention after bystander training, while validated tools like the 22-item Negative Acts Questionnaire help quantify exposure reliably.
03 · Category
Prevention & Policy3 stats
01
76% of organizations provide employee training on harassment prevention (training coverage).[10]
02
42% of organizations conduct climate or pulse surveys that include bullying/harassment measures (survey-based detection share).[1]
03
29% of organizations use targeted training for remote/hybrid work bullying and harassment risks (remote training adoption).[11]
Interpretation
Prevention & Policy Interpretation
While 76% of organizations provide harassment prevention training, only 42% back it up with climate or pulse surveys and 29% tailor remote or hybrid training for bullying and harassment risks, showing that many Prevention and Policy efforts are stronger in training than in ongoing detection and remote-specific coverage.
More related reading
04 · Category
Culture, Policy & Law3 stats
01
78% of employees say they believe management should intervene in bullying situations (intervention expectation share).[11]
02
Germany’s Federal Anti-Discrimination Act (AGG) has been in force since 2006, providing legal protections against harassment in employment (law duration/protection).[12]
03
In Canada, the National Standard on Psychological Health and Safety at Work recommends nine core elements to prevent psychological harm including harassment and violence-related risks (standard elements count).[13]
Interpretation
Culture, Policy & Law Interpretation
With 78% of employees expecting management to intervene, the Culture, Policy & Law picture is clear that stronger intervention-led culture must be backed by legal and standard frameworks like Germany’s AGG since 2006 and Canada’s nine core elements for preventing psychological harm.
05 · Category
Legal & Economic Cost2 stats
01
EU employers can face legal liabilities for workplace bullying/harassment under health and safety and equal treatment duties; investigations and litigation costs can be substantial (legal exposure quantified in enforcement reports).[14]
02
38% of HR leaders reported that bullying/harassment led to higher turnover-related recruiting costs (HR cost impact share).[15]
Interpretation
Legal & Economic Cost Interpretation
Under the Legal & Economic Cost lens, EU employers can be held legally responsible for workplace bullying through health and safety and equal treatment duties, while 38% of HR leaders say bullying or harassment also raises turnover-driven recruiting costs.
06 · Category
Overview6 stats
01
$57.7 billion in annual U.S. productivity loss is attributed to workplace harassment (annual cost estimate).[16]
02
$4.1 million is the median settlement amount range in workplace harassment litigation cases in the U.S. (median/typical settlement figure).[17]
03
30% of employees who experience workplace bullying report that it caused them to consider leaving their job (turnover intent associated with bullying).[18]
04
1 in 5 workers in the U.S. report being bullied or harassed at work (prevalence incidence estimate).[19]
05
55% of employees who reported harassment said it did not change their situation (ineffectiveness share).[20]
06
Organizations with manager training report 30% fewer bullying complaints (complaint reduction share).[21]
Interpretation
Industry Overview Interpretation
From an industry overview perspective, workplace bullying is widespread and costly, with 1 in 5 U.S. workers reporting harassment and an estimated $57.7 billion in annual productivity loss, yet only 30% of organizations that train managers see a corresponding drop in complaints.
Reference
Cite This Report
This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.
APA
Aisha Okonkwo. (2026, February 13). Bullying In The Workplace Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/bullying-in-the-workplace-statistics
MLA
Aisha Okonkwo. "Bullying In The Workplace Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/bullying-in-the-workplace-statistics.
Chicago
Aisha Okonkwo. 2026. "Bullying In The Workplace Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/bullying-in-the-workplace-statistics.
Sources & references
21 sources cited across this report
apa.org
academic.oup.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
sciencedirect.com
journals.sagepub.com
tandfonline.com
journals.lww.com
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
complianceweek.com
oecd.org
gesetze-im-internet.de
- csps-efpc.gc.ca
eur-lex.europa.eu
gartner.com
nber.org
aba.com
indeed.com
rand.org
- humanrights.gov.au
hbs.edu