GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Transportation VehiclesTop 10 Best Vehicle Maintenance Management Software of 2026
Top 10 vehicle maintenance management software ranked for fleet teams, with comparison notes on Geotab, AssetWorks FleetFocus, and Fleetio.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Geotab is the best fit when you want telematics-driven maintenance tied to deep system integration, whereas Fleetio works well for dispersed fleets that need mobile work orders with consistent PM intervals and cost reporting; go with AssetWorks FleetFocus if multi-location governance and cost-accounting alignment matter.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Geotab
Maintenance work orders can be driven by telematics health patterns and fault events, then tracked through technician execution history.
Built for fits when fleets need telematics-driven maintenance workflows and strong system-to-system integration..
AssetWorks FleetFocus
Editor pickMaintenance cost accounting derived from work order and parts capture, then used in fleet-level spend reporting.
Built for fits when multi-location fleets need governed work order workflows tied to cost accounting..
Fleetio
Editor pickTechnician mobile completion creates a unified service timeline tied to usage-based triggers and captured expenses.
Built for fits when fleets need mobile work orders, consistent intervals, and cost reporting across dispersed sites..
Comparison Table
Geotab
enterpriseFleet telematics platform with maintenance management and fault diagnostic add-ins.
Maintenance work orders can be driven by telematics health patterns and fault events, then tracked through technician execution history.
Geotab’s maintenance management centers on work order creation, scheduling, and technician history connected to vehicle entities and telematics-driven triggers. Inspection checklists and recorded defects can be converted into corrective maintenance tracking, while service interval adherence supports preventive maintenance scheduling based on usage and engine conditions. Maintenance cost accounting is supported through captured labor, parts, and service entries that tie back to specific work orders.
A tradeoff is that telematics-triggered maintenance workflows depend on data quality and signal mapping to vehicle systems before rules deliver consistent results. Geotab is a strong fit for fleets that already run telematics monitoring and need maintenance records synchronized to an operations or ERP system.
- +API integration connects maintenance records to external work management systems
- +Telematics ingestion enables maintenance triggers from live vehicle health signals
- +Work order history ties technician actions to specific vehicle events
- +Maintenance schedules align with service interval and condition inputs
- –Rule accuracy depends on telematics signal mapping and vehicle configuration
- –Mobile technician workflows require more setup than checklist-only tools
- –Parts and bill of materials associations take disciplined data entry
- –Reporting depth depends on consistent coding of work types
Fleet maintenance managers
Corrective orders from recurring fault events
Lower repeat failures
Operations and EAM integration teams
Two-way sync with work management tools
Single source of maintenance truth
Show 2 more scenarios
Technician leads
Standardized procedures across fleets
More consistent repairs
Apply maintenance procedures and capture technician work history tied to each vehicle order.
Compliance and fleet governance
Regulatory inspection readiness tracking
Faster closure of inspection issues
Store inspection outcomes and link them to corrective maintenance actions for follow-up.
Best for: Fits when fleets need telematics-driven maintenance workflows and strong system-to-system integration.
AssetWorks FleetFocus
enterpriseEnterprise fleet asset management with maintenance scheduling and work order modules.
Maintenance cost accounting derived from work order and parts capture, then used in fleet-level spend reporting.
AssetWorks FleetFocus fits organizations that manage mixed vehicle types and need consistent inspection checklists and service interval adherence across operating units. Work orders can capture the full maintenance loop, from scheduling through completion, with technician attribution and procedure-based guidance. Maintenance records then feed maintenance cost accounting so managers can compare spend by vehicle, cause, and shop activity.
A common tradeoff is implementation effort when the maintenance procedure library, work order templates, and parts associations must match existing internal practices. Fleet teams that already standardize repair codes and preventive intervals benefit most when they want faster technician completion while keeping governance tight across multiple locations.
- +Procedure-driven work orders with technician attribution improve consistency
- +Maintenance cost accounting links spend to completed work orders
- +Preventive scheduling supports recurring service interval adherence
- +Parts and bill associations reduce repeat data entry for repairs
- –Configuration work is required to map procedures and templates to local workflows
- –Telematics workflows may depend on integration design for vehicle health diagnostics
- –Report customization requires admin effort for multi-site rollups
- –Mobile use is strongest when forms and checklists are configured upfront
Fleet maintenance managers
Reduce downtime with standardized work orders
Fewer overdue maintenance events
Maintenance operations analysts
Account for maintenance spend by cause
Clear maintenance cost breakdown
Show 2 more scenarios
Shop supervisors
Coordinate repeat repairs across vehicles
Lower variation in repairs
Bill of materials associations standardize repair steps and parts selection for recurring issues.
Fleet program administrators
Enforce maintenance procedure consistency
More consistent audit trails
Configured procedure and checklist templates standardize inspection and corrective maintenance documentation.
Best for: Fits when multi-location fleets need governed work order workflows tied to cost accounting.
Fleetio
SMB to enterpriseFleet maintenance management platform for tracking vehicles, work orders, and preventive maintenance schedules.
Technician mobile completion creates a unified service timeline tied to usage-based triggers and captured expenses.
Fleetio supports preventive maintenance scheduling with recurring service definitions and mileage or usage triggers, then connects resulting work orders to technician completion notes and labor entries. Inspection checklists can be attached to vehicles and used to record findings, while service history preserves a timeline for each asset. Maintenance cost accounting is handled by capturing expenses against work and then rolling them into reporting views for managers.
A key tradeoff is that deeper vehicle health diagnostics depend on what telematics data the connected provider supplies, so some teams still need manual entry for components without sensor coverage. Fleetio fits operations that already run work orders through a mobile technician flow and need consistent service interval adherence across a distributed fleet.
- +Mobile technician work completion ties notes, labor, and parts to vehicle service history
- +Recurring maintenance intervals can be driven by vehicle usage inputs
- +Telematics integrations can feed mileage and readings into scheduling decisions
- +Expense capture links maintenance spending to specific work orders
- –Maintenance scheduling quality depends on completeness of usage data from integrations
- –Advanced parts and bill-of-materials workflows can require careful admin setup
- –Reporting depth for cross-system KPIs is limited without additional data exports
- –Complex approval chains may demand disciplined process design
Fleet operations managers
Schedule recurring services by mileage thresholds
Higher service interval adherence
Field maintenance technicians
Complete inspections on mobile
Fewer missed inspections
Show 2 more scenarios
Fleet finance analysts
Track maintenance spend by vehicle and work
Clearer maintenance cost drivers
Captured expenses are associated with work orders for reporting and review.
Operations admins
Control access across maintenance roles
Reduced data integrity risk
Role-based access supports controlled creation and edits for maintenance operations.
Best for: Fits when fleets need mobile work orders, consistent intervals, and cost reporting across dispersed sites.
Samsara
enterpriseConnected operations platform with vehicle maintenance, telematics, and safety modules.
Telematics to maintenance linkage uses sensor context to drive work order creation and updates for vehicle health signals.
Samsara connects vehicle telematics signals to maintenance workflows so work orders reflect actual operating conditions. The system supports inspection checklists, preventive maintenance scheduling, and corrective maintenance tracking tied to individual assets and service intervals.
Maintenance teams can capture technician work history on mobile and keep maintenance documentation aligned to each incident or work order. Data flows through Samsara’s integration layer for automated updates to fleet maintenance records.
- +Maintenance triggers can use live telematics signals from vehicle sensors
- +Inspection checklists and service intervals stay tied to specific vehicle assets
- +Mobile technician capture links work performed to completed work orders
- +Integration layer supports automated synchronization of maintenance records
- –Workflow design requires disciplined configuration of triggers and interval rules
- –Deep parts and bill of materials workflows depend on how inventory processes are built
- –Custom reporting often requires more effort than basic fleet utilization views
- –Field coverage of maintenance procedure libraries can feel limited compared with CMMS-first tools
Best for: Fits when fleet teams need telematics-driven maintenance actions with mobile capture and integrations.
ProClass CMMS
vertical specialistAsset and fleet maintenance management software for public sector and utilities.
Procedure-driven work orders with repeatable job steps help standardize corrective maintenance execution across technicians.
ProClass CMMS is used to plan preventive maintenance work and record corrective maintenance through the same vehicle maintenance work order workflow.
Fleet teams can connect inspections, job steps, and completed technician history back to each vehicle asset record for audit-ready maintenance trails.
Maintenance cost accounting can be derived from labor and parts usage tied to each completed work order to support fleet utilization reporting inputs.
- +Vehicle-focused workflow keeps work orders, inspections, and asset history linked
- +Preventive schedules support service interval adherence and renewal planning
- +Parts used can be associated to completed jobs for better maintenance cost accounting
- +Maintenance procedure templates reduce variation across technicians
- –Telematics ingestion and OBD-II data ingestion are limited to supported integrations
- –Advanced routing and dispatching workflow depth depends on add-on configuration
- –Multi-site governance relies on disciplined role setup to keep access clean
- –Detailed maintenance downtime analytics depend on consistent status coding
Best for: Fits when fleets need structured work orders and standardized procedures without heavy custom integration requirements.
Lightship Group
vertical specialistFleet maintenance and compliance software for commercial vehicle operators.
Technician work history is maintained with an audit-focused change record tied to maintenance activity details.
Lightship Group focuses on vehicle maintenance management with an emphasis on operational workflow and fleet asset oversight rather than generic work-order entry. The solution supports planned maintenance and corrective maintenance tracking through structured maintenance records tied to vehicles and maintenance activities.
It also provides governance features for controlling technician access and maintaining an auditable history of maintenance actions. Lightship Group fits organizations that need consistent maintenance documentation with enough automation to reduce manual coordination.
- +Workflow-led maintenance tracking ties work history to specific vehicles
- +Audit trail coverage supports review of who changed what and when
- +Role-based technician access reduces accidental cross-role edits
- +Maintenance schedules keep service interval adherence visible
- –External integration depends on partner connectors or custom work
- –Parts and bill-of-materials depth may require additional configuration
- –Mobile field execution can require process discipline for checklist completion
- –Reporting breadth for uptime and downtime analytics is limited
Best for: Fits when fleets need structured maintenance records, technician access control, and audit-friendly change history.
MaintainX
SMB to midMobile CMMS for preventive maintenance, work orders, and fleet asset tracking.
Mobile inspection and checklist capture tied to work orders for recurring compliance-style maintenance logs.
MaintainX is vehicle maintenance management software that emphasizes field-ready work orders, inspections, and recurring maintenance workflows. It connects maintenance activity to real vehicle assets with technician assignment, parts and labor capture, and maintenance history.
Automation focuses on service interval adherence, checklists, and repeatable procedures that reduce manual tracking. Integration support includes an API surface for pulling and pushing operational data into connected systems.
- +Mobile work orders support checklist capture and technician notes
- +Recurring service schedules reduce missed preventive maintenance events
- +Maintenance history and cost fields support practical maintenance cost accounting
- +API access supports data synchronization with external fleet and telematics tools
- –Complex workflows need careful configuration to match distinct fleet rules
- –Parts and bill of materials workflows can require discipline to stay accurate
- –Audit and role governance features depend on admin setup for each team
- –Deep dispatching workflow coverage is limited compared with dedicated fleet systems
Best for: Fits when fleets need repeatable inspections and work orders with API integration to external systems.
MPulse
mid to enterpriseCMMS with fleet maintenance modules for work orders, PM scheduling, and parts inventory.
Technician-facing inspection checklists and work order execution stay connected to the same vehicle service history.
MPulse focuses on vehicle maintenance management with work order execution, inspections, and scheduling tied to fleet assets. Maintenance records stay connected to technicians, parts usage, and service history so managers can reconcile costs against completed work.
The product supports notifications and routing around service events, plus reporting for maintenance performance and downtime attribution. Integration depth centers on importing and syncing fleet and maintenance data so teams can reduce manual updates across systems.
- +Work order tracking keeps labor steps and outcomes linked to the asset
- +Inspection and checklist execution supports consistent field service documentation
- +Parts and service history association helps maintenance cost accounting
- +Notification routing for service events reduces missed maintenance tasks
- –Complex workflows can require careful configuration to match operational policies
- –Reporting coverage for utilization analytics depends on how data is entered
- –Deep integrations beyond import workflows can demand custom setup effort
- –Warranty and compliance-specific workflows may need extensions to fully match audits
Best for: Fits when fleet teams need end-to-end work orders with inspections, parts tracking, and maintenance history.
Fleet Complete
enterpriseFleet management software combining vehicle tracking, maintenance scheduling, diagnostics, and reporting.
Mobile field workflows that capture maintenance inspection checklists in the same operational context as work orders.
Fleet Complete manages vehicle maintenance workflows with work order planning for preventive and corrective maintenance. It ties maintenance records to fleet assets so teams can track technician work history and service interval adherence.
Fleet Complete also supports inspection checklists and mobile field service workflows for off-site data capture. Fleet Complete integrates fleet operations data streams through telematics connectivity options and exposes automation hooks for downstream reporting.
- +Maintenance work orders align to scheduled service intervals and asset records
- +Technician work history is tied to specific maintenance activities
- +Mobile inspection checklists support consistent off-site capture
- +Integration options connect maintenance events to fleet operations data
- –Advanced automation depends on integrations and workflow configuration discipline
- –Parts and bill of materials depth can require additional setup for complex BOMs
- –Maintenance procedure library coverage can be thinner for unusual compliance regimes
- –Reporting granularity may require data shaping outside the core interface
Best for: Fits when fleet operators need mobile inspection capture and work order tracking tied to vehicles.
Motive
enterpriseFleet management software with vehicle maintenance, inspections, fault monitoring, and compliance workflows.
Connected-vehicle condition signals can be referenced during maintenance execution to prioritize work beyond fixed intervals.
Motive is a fleet maintenance management solution that ties vehicle records to work orders, inspections, and maintenance history. It supports preventive maintenance scheduling and service interval tracking across vehicles and teams, with technician work history linked to completed jobs.
Maintenance cost accounting is handled through job and parts capture that feeds reporting on spend by asset and activity. Motive also focuses on vehicle health signals via connected-vehicle data so maintenance decisions can reference real driving and system conditions.
- +Work orders stay linked to inspection results and technician history for traceability
- +Preventive maintenance intervals and adherence tracking reduce missed service events
- +Maintenance cost accounting connects labor and parts capture to asset-level reporting
- +Connected-vehicle signals support condition-referenced maintenance prioritization
- –Setup takes careful mapping of vehicles, schedules, and work templates
- –Parts and bill of materials depth can lag teams running complex multi-site inventories
- –Automation needs disciplined routing rules to prevent notification overload
- –Cross-team governance relies on role setup to avoid audit trail gaps
Best for: Fits when fleets need scheduled and corrective work tied to technician history and cost reporting.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 transportation vehicles, Geotab stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right vehicle maintenance management software
Vehicle maintenance management software centralizes preventive maintenance scheduling, corrective maintenance tracking, and technician work history across vehicle assets and sites. This guide covers Geotab, AssetWorks FleetFocus, Fleetio, Samsara, ProClass CMMS, Lightship Group, MaintainX, MPulse, Fleet Complete, and Motive.
The best implementations hinge on integration depth between telematics signals and work order creation, plus the automation surface that updates schedules and execution records. Governance strength also matters when access control, audit log coverage, and maintenance procedure consistency must hold across multiple locations and user roles.
Vehicle maintenance management software for work orders, inspections, and maintenance execution history
Vehicle maintenance management software runs the workflow from service triggers to technician execution by combining vehicle assets, scheduled intervals, and work order tracking in one operating view. Systems like Geotab connect telematics health patterns and fault events to maintenance work orders, then track outcomes through technician execution history.
Many platforms also attach operational checklists to scheduled and corrective work so inspection results stay linked to the same vehicle service timeline. Samsara emphasizes telematics-driven maintenance actions that use sensor context to create and update work orders while keeping inspection checklists tied to specific vehicle assets.
Integration, automation, and governance checks for vehicle maintenance management
Vehicle maintenance management software must connect service triggers to technician execution so work orders reflect real vehicle condition and real field outcomes. The strongest implementations also maintain governed cost, procedural consistency, and audit-ready change records across vehicles and locations.
Telematics-to-work order triggers with execution traceability
Geotab creates maintenance work orders from telematics health patterns and fault events, then tracks execution through technician work history. Samsara ties telematics sensor context to work order creation and updates while keeping inspection checklists attached to the same vehicle asset.
Procedure-driven work orders tied to technician attribution
AssetWorks FleetFocus uses procedure-driven work orders with technician attribution to improve consistency across governed workflows. ProClass CMMS standardizes corrective execution with repeatable job steps and keeps inspections and asset history linked to the vehicle workflow.
Maintenance cost accounting linked to completed work and parts capture
AssetWorks FleetFocus derives maintenance cost accounting from work order and parts capture, then rolls those costs into fleet-level spend reporting. Geotab emphasizes API integration so maintenance records can connect to external work management systems, which supports end-to-end cost attribution outside the maintenance tool.
Mobile field capture that writes into the same service timeline
Fleetio ties technician mobile completion to a unified service timeline with notes, labor, and parts linked to vehicle service history. MPulse keeps inspection and checklist execution connected to the same vehicle service history so field documentation and outcomes remain traceable.
Recurring maintenance scheduling driven by usage and interval rules
Fleetio supports recurring maintenance intervals driven by vehicle usage inputs, then ties scheduled events to mobile completion and captured expenses. Motive provides both preventive interval tracking and connected-vehicle condition signals to prioritize work beyond fixed intervals.
Inspection checklist attachment and recurring compliance-style logs
MaintainX links mobile inspection and checklist capture to work orders for recurring compliance-style maintenance logs. Fleet Complete anchors mobile inspection checklists in the same operational context as work orders so scheduled service intervals and vehicle asset records stay aligned.
Choose a maintenance workflow model by trigger source, execution capture, and governance needs
The selection should start with how maintenance gets triggered and how that trigger becomes a work order that technicians can complete with the right level of structure. Governance controls decide whether procedure consistency, auditability, and cross-system integrations remain dependable when roles and sites scale up.
Pick the trigger philosophy: telematics events versus rule-based schedules
If maintenance should start from live vehicle condition, prioritize Geotab or Samsara because both link sensor context to work order creation and updates. If maintenance should start from scheduled intervals and then incorporate signals later, prioritize Fleetio or Motive because intervals and adherence tracking stay central to the workflow.
Map the field execution model: checklist-only versus structured procedure steps
If technicians need repeatable job steps, prioritize ProClass CMMS because it standardizes corrective execution with procedure-driven work orders. If the workflow centers on inspections and checklist completion, prioritize MaintainX or Fleet Complete because mobile inspection capture stays connected to scheduled work and vehicle records.
Confirm cost accounting depth based on how parts and labor are captured
If fleet spend reporting must tie directly to completed work orders and parts capture, prioritize AssetWorks FleetFocus because maintenance cost accounting is derived from those records. If the organization needs work orders to flow into external systems for cost and process linkage, prioritize Geotab because API integration connects maintenance records to external work management systems.
Verify mobile writes into the same service timeline used for reporting
If technicians must complete work on mobile devices and keep the service timeline consistent, prioritize Fleetio because mobile completion ties notes, labor, and parts to vehicle service history. If inspection execution must remain connected to the same asset timeline with field documentation, prioritize MPulse because work order tracking links labor steps and outcomes to the asset.
Size governance and audit requirements to the change-control workflow
If audit-friendly change history is a hard requirement, prioritize Lightship Group because it maintains technician work history with an audit-focused change record tied to maintenance activity details. If auditability depends on standard workflow discipline and careful trigger configuration, plan for added governance effort with tools that require disciplined configuration of triggers and interval rules.
Who benefits from vehicle maintenance management workflows
Vehicle maintenance management software benefits fleets that need traceability from vehicle condition or schedules to work order execution and service history. The fit depends on whether maintenance actions must be driven by telematics, governed by procedures, or captured by technicians in mobile workflows.
Fleet teams using live vehicle health signals to trigger maintenance
Geotab and Samsara create and update work orders based on sensor context and telematics triggers, then preserve technician execution history tied to the originating vehicle signals.
Multi-location operations that require governed work order processes and cost accounting
AssetWorks FleetFocus connects procedure-driven work orders and technician attribution to maintenance cost accounting, which supports fleet-level spend reporting across locations.
Field service organizations that depend on mobile inspection and checklist capture
MaintainX and Fleet Complete emphasize mobile inspection checklists tied to work orders and asset records so compliance-style logs and execution notes stay connected to the maintenance timeline.
Maintenance managers that need standardized job steps for corrective work
ProClass CMMS supports repeatable job steps with procedure-driven work orders so technicians execute corrective maintenance with consistent structure across assets.
Operators that run usage-based preventive schedules across dispersed sites
Fleetio drives recurring intervals from usage inputs and ties technician mobile completion to a unified service timeline with captured expenses.
Common pitfalls when implementing vehicle maintenance management software
Most failures come from mismatched trigger inputs, incomplete setup discipline, or underestimating how parts and workflow configuration affect execution quality. The fixes are usually practical changes to mapping, governance, and workflow design, not broader process changes.
Trigger rules look correct in testing but break in production due to missing telematics signal mapping
Geotab warns that rule accuracy depends on telematics signal mapping and vehicle configuration, so validate mappings per vehicle type before enabling telematics-driven maintenance triggers.
Procedure templates and local workflow steps are not configured to match real maintenance operations
AssetWorks FleetFocus requires configuration to map procedures and templates to local workflows, so build and sign off templates for each location before scaling technician attribution.
Mobile usage data is incomplete, which degrades preventive interval scheduling quality
Fleetio notes that scheduling quality depends on completeness of usage data from integrations, so prioritize reliable usage inputs before relying on usage-driven recurring maintenance.
Parts and bill-of-materials workflows are treated as an afterthought
Fleetio and Samsara both indicate advanced parts and bill-of-materials depth depends on careful admin setup, so decide BOM granularity early and enforce data entry rules for parts capture.
Automation and routing depth is expected without the needed configuration governance
Samsara and MPulse both link workflow automation quality to disciplined configuration, so define interval rules, trigger escalation logic, and reporting expectations as part of rollout governance.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated each tool on features, ease, and value using implementation signals from the provided capability cards. Features accounted for 40% of the ranking because telematics-to-work order linkage and technician execution history determine whether maintenance actions actually reflect vehicle condition.
Ease and value each accounted for 30% because mobile completion and onboarding burden influence whether work orders are completed consistently across sites. Geotab set the top result because it ties telematics health patterns and fault events to maintenance work orders and then tracks outcomes through technician execution history while also offering API integration to connect maintenance records to external work management systems.
Frequently Asked Questions About vehicle maintenance management software
How do vehicle maintenance management platforms connect telematics signals to work order creation?
Which systems provide an API or automation hooks for syncing maintenance data with other fleet tools?
How should teams migrate existing asset, inspection, and service history into a new maintenance system?
What access controls and audit features matter for maintenance administration?
What tradeoff appears when maintenance procedures are standardized versus heavily customized?
When does preventive maintenance scheduling fail, and where is the gap handled best?
Which platforms support technician work history linked directly to execution and status changes?
How do maintenance systems handle parts capture and bill of materials association for cost accounting?
Where do inspection checklists fit in the workflow, and how are they tied to work orders?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
- Transportation VehiclesTop 10 Best Vehicle Lease Management Software of 2026
- Transportation LogisticsTop 10 Best Fleet Maintenance Software of 2026
- Automotive ServicesTop 10 Best Vehicle Monitoring Software of 2026
- Transportation LogisticsTop 10 Best Vehicle Route Planning Software of 2026
- Transportation VehiclesTop 10 Best Boat Fleet Management Software of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Transportation Vehicles alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of transportation vehicles tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare transportation vehicles tools→