GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Business FinanceTop 10 Best Time Plan Software of 2026
Ranked time plan software for planning teams, comparing scheduling, reporting, and collaboration across tools like Saviom, Teamwork.com, and Smartsheet.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Saviom is the best fit for multi-project teams that need true capacity and dependency-aware scheduling with plan-linked collaboration, whereas Teamwork.com works well for planning groups that want timeline sharing and status dashboards without heavy scheduling administration.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Saviom
Resource-level scheduling with assignment capacity checks ties workload visibility to dependency-driven dates.
Built for fits when multi-project teams need dependency logic, capacity control, and plan-linked collaboration..
Teamwork.com
Editor pickTask records keep timeline context, comments, and update history in one place for plan-to-execution continuity.
Built for fits when planning teams need collaboration-rich timelines with dependency links and status dashboards..
Smartsheet
Editor pickTimeline views and dashboards stay tied to the same underlying sheet records.
Built for fits when planning teams need collaborative, schedule-linked reporting without heavy administration overhead..
Comparison Table
Saviom
enterpriseEnterprise resource planning and scheduling software for time and capacity management.
Resource-level scheduling with assignment capacity checks ties workload visibility to dependency-driven dates.
Saviom supports dependency mapping, scheduling constraints, and iterative updates so the time plan remains coherent as tasks move. Resource planning is driven by named roles or resources tied to assignments, with capacity checks that highlight overloads and underutilization. Reporting focuses on plan vs actual views and schedule health signals that help planners explain schedule variance to stakeholders. Collaboration is built into task and assignment status so updates remain connected to the plan structure.
A key tradeoff is that advanced scheduling behavior depends on disciplined dependency and effort setup, since incorrect links or estimates propagate into capacity outcomes. Saviom fits teams that run recurring planning cycles across multiple projects and need collaboration plus structured resource allocation, not just a task list. It also fits organizations that expect system integrations for timesheet ingestion, status feeds, and downstream analytics without manual exports.
- +Dependency-aware scheduling keeps updates consistent across task changes
- +Capacity views show overload risk at assignment and resource levels
- +Assignment-centric collaboration ties status directly to the time plan
- +API supports schedule data exchange and automation workflows
- –High schedule quality depends on accurate dependencies and effort inputs
- –Multi-project governance needs defined roles, ownership, and review routines
- –Some reporting requires learning the platform’s reporting objects
- –Large plans can slow interaction during heavy filtering and redraws
Project portfolio managers
Prioritize interdependent delivery timelines
Lower schedule conflict frequency
Resource planning teams
Prevent role overloads during rollout
Fewer last-minute reschedules
Show 2 more scenarios
PMO and program leads
Track plan vs actual variance
Clearer variance explanations
Maintain task updates in the schedule and monitor drift against planned dates.
RevOps and operations
Automate planning data exchange
Reduced manual reporting work
Use the API to ingest status signals and push schedule updates into downstream systems.
Best for: Fits when multi-project teams need dependency logic, capacity control, and plan-linked collaboration.
Teamwork.com
SMBProject management platform with time tracking and project planning features.
Task records keep timeline context, comments, and update history in one place for plan-to-execution continuity.
Teamwork.com supports timeline planning through task-level dates and dependency links, which lets teams reason about downstream work as schedules change. It connects those timeline fields to execution details like assignees, comments, attachments, and status so schedule updates do not live in a separate sheet. Reporting and dashboards can be configured around project progress and work states, which helps planning teams share schedule health without extracting data to separate tools.
A key tradeoff is that advanced schedule analytics beyond status dashboards depend on disciplined use of dependencies and consistent effort and milestone updates. Teamwork.com fits situations where teams need collaboration-grade task context inside the plan, such as cross-functional delivery with frequent re-planning and stakeholder reporting.
- +Timeline planning stays linked to task assignments and discussion history
- +Dependency-based scheduling supports change impact across related work
- +Dashboards and reporting reflect live work states without extra exports
- +Permissions can separate planners from execution staff
- –Dependency accuracy depends on consistent task date and milestone updates
- –Portfolio timeline views can feel limited for complex multi-program planning
- –Automation coverage for schedule calculations is narrower than dedicated schedulers
- –Reporting customization requires careful tagging of projects and tasks
Project managers in services
Replan dependencies while tracking stakeholder updates
Reduced schedule confusion across teams
PMOs and program coordinators
Report progress from live project states
Faster status reporting cycles
Show 1 more scenario
Delivery leads in IT
Coordinate cross-team work with shared timelines
Fewer handoff misses
Assignments and comments inside the work items keep delivery execution visible to planners.
Best for: Fits when planning teams need collaboration-rich timelines with dependency links and status dashboards.
Smartsheet
enterpriseSpreadsheet-based work execution platform with time and resource planning views.
Timeline views and dashboards stay tied to the same underlying sheet records.
Smartsheet’s timeline planning centers on interactive sheets that can be visualized as a schedule, with fields for planned dates, actual progress, and dependency relationships that feed the timeline views. Reports and dashboards pull from those same sheet records, which helps scheduling and collaboration teams keep status reporting aligned to task-level updates. Automation rules trigger updates and notifications when rows change, which reduces lag between planning decisions and execution reporting.
A key tradeoff is that Smartsheet’s planning depth depends on how planning logic is modeled in sheets rather than on a dedicated constraint solver for complex scheduling scenarios. It fits best when teams need collaborative schedule management with frequent status refreshes, and when time-phased reporting and dependency visibility matter more than advanced schedule optimization.
- +Spreadsheet-native data entry keeps planning fields close to execution status
- +Schedule views update from row-level dates and progress fields
- +Dashboards unify planning metrics and collaboration signals
- +Automation rules reduce manual status propagation across sheets
- –Advanced schedule optimization needs careful sheet modeling
- –Dependency and schedule logic can become complex across many linked sheets
- –Timeline interactivity relies on consistent date field hygiene
- –Some planning workflows depend on add-on integrations for full coverage
Program management offices
Coordinate milestones across multiple teams
Faster cross-team schedule alignment
Operations planning teams
Maintain weekly rolling schedules
Reduced status update latency
Show 2 more scenarios
Project managers
Run dependency-aware schedule updates
Clearer dependency impact visibility
Project managers link tasks and track actual progress while timeline views reflect updates from row fields.
Resource coordinators
Report capacity signals alongside tasks
More consistent resource planning
Coordinators maintain allocation fields in sheets and use dashboards to report utilization trends with schedule health.
Best for: Fits when planning teams need collaborative, schedule-linked reporting without heavy administration overhead.
Float
SMBResource scheduling and project time planning software for agencies and teams.
Dependency-aware drag-and-reschedule that cascades timing changes across predecessors and successors.
Float combines a visual planning board with schedule-linked task timelines to help teams plan across workstreams and keep delivery dates current. It supports dependency-aware scheduling so tasks move with changes to predecessors, while rollups show project progress across levels of work.
Float also connects planning to time tracking by syncing with supported timesheet tools and keeps team visibility through role-based views and shared calendars. For collaboration, it provides commenting and assignment context directly on schedule items so updates stay attached to the plan.
- +Dependency-aware rescheduling keeps dates consistent as tasks change
- +Visual timeline and board views reduce context switching during planning
- +Schedule-to-timesheet sync supports ongoing forecast updates
- +RBAC-style access scoping supports separate stakeholder views
- –Advanced scheduling controls require careful configuration of calendars and working time
- –Dependency modeling can feel limited for complex multi-project governance
Best for: Fits when planning teams need dependency-driven timelines and calendar visibility with light automation.
Monday.com
SMBA work operating system that includes time tracking, project planning, and resource management capabilities.
Automation-triggered timeline updates that keep due dates, statuses, and stakeholder notifications synchronized across projects.
Monday.com can run time-planned work using timeline views, dependency links, and resource-oriented boards tied to schedules. Teams can set milestones, assign owners, and track progress across projects with reporting that surfaces schedule health and workload trends.
Automation recipes can update statuses, notify stakeholders, and trigger recurring cadence tasks across workspaces. The system’s extensibility relies on a documented API plus integrations that connect calendars, spreadsheets, and work tools to the underlying task records.
- +Timeline view renders dependencies and milestones on a single schedule surface
- +Automation can sync status changes to recurring cadence tasks and alerts
- +Board-driven modeling keeps assignments, dates, and progress in one place
- +API and webhooks support custom integrations around task and time fields
- –Critical-path style calculations are limited versus dedicated scheduling engines
- –Large dependency graphs can become slow to review in timeline-heavy projects
- –Cross-project resource planning needs careful conventions for workload fields
- –Governance controls require disciplined setup for consistent reporting structure
Best for: Fits when planning teams need timeline-linked execution tracking with automation and integrations.
Asana
SMBWork management platform with timeline planning and time tracking integrations.
Timeline projects with assignees, due dates, and dependencies update automatically as task fields change.
Asana fits teams that need task planning, dependency-aware execution, and collaboration around shared timelines. It uses project views like Timeline to visualize schedules, milestones, and assignee ownership without requiring a separate scheduling system.
Asana also supports automation rules and a documented API for integrations, plus admin controls for workspace governance. Time tracking can be connected through integrations, but Asana does not provide full schedule analytics like Monte Carlo forecasting or resource leveling.
- +Timeline view links tasks to dates with milestone markers and dependencies
- +Automation rules can route work, update fields, and trigger on status changes
- +Extensive API supports custom planning and reporting around Asana objects
- +Templates, project permissions, and workspace settings support repeatable governance
- –Capacity planning and schedule variance analytics are limited compared with dedicated planning tools
- –Dependency modeling is mostly task-level and lacks advanced constraint engines
- –Resource utilization views like heatmaps require external dashboards and data pulls
- –Time reporting depth depends on connected time-tracking integrations
Best for: Fits when planning teams need timeline visualization and automation across work items, not full schedule optimization.
ClickUp
SMBAll-in-one productivity platform with time tracking and scheduling features.
Automation rules tied to custom fields and task events let plans evolve as work status changes.
ClickUp combines task planning, schedule views, and reporting in one workspace, which reduces the need to copy plan data between tools. Its scheduling workflow uses nested tasks with dependencies, baselines, and timeline views for cross-team coordination.
Reporting centers on status rollups, custom dashboards, and time-based summaries that reflect work progress across many projects. Automation and extensibility via API webhooks and custom fields support planning sequences that trigger from status and assignee changes.
- +Timeline and dependency-based planning stay tied to the same task records
- +Custom dashboards aggregate multi-project status using shared custom fields
- +Automation rules trigger on task status, assignee, and custom field changes
- +API and webhooks support integration-driven planning and reporting pipelines
- –Advanced schedule logic can require careful configuration across task hierarchy
- –Resource-focused planning features are limited compared with dedicated scheduling tools
Best for: Fits when planning teams need one system for task dependencies, timeline reporting, and workflow automation.
Wrike
enterpriseProject management software with time tracking and resource planning tools.
Work item status change automation and approvals can be enforced directly inside plan execution workflows.
Wrike centers schedule planning around work items that move through configurable workflows, with reporting tied to status, ownership, and due dates. Planning teams can manage cross-team initiatives using Gantt views, dependency mapping between tasks, and milestone tracking that keeps rollups consistent across plans.
Collaboration stays attached to work items through comments, file links, and updates that feed schedule and portfolio reporting. For time plan execution, Wrike also supports time tracking and resource-oriented reporting to connect effort to deliverables.
- +Configurable request and approval workflows attach schedule gates to work items
- +Dependency links between tasks work inside Gantt views and milestone structures
- +Portfolio-style reporting aggregates progress by status, owner, and due date
- +Time tracking ties effort updates to the same work records used for planning
- –Advanced planning setups require careful configuration of templates and permissions
- –Resource-oriented schedule views are less granular than dedicated capacity tools
- –Large dependency graphs can slow down interaction during plan edits
- –Some schedule adjustments rely on process discipline more than automatic re-optimization
Best for: Fits when planning teams need Gantt-based dependency tracking plus workflow-driven approvals and item-level collaboration.
Mosaic
SMBResource management for project-driven firms.
Item-linked collaboration inside the time plan lets reviewers discuss schedule changes where work updates already live.
Mosaic is a time plan software used to turn project calendars into trackable work plans with schedules, assignments, and updates. It supports planning workflows built around tasks and dates, then carries those schedules into execution views for progress reporting.
Mosaic’s collaboration features focus on shared planning artifacts and commentary tied to work items. Administration centers on user access and workspace configuration so planning teams can manage who can plan and who can review.
- +Planning views keep dates, owners, and status in the same workflow
- +Commenting attached to work items supports schedule discussion during execution
- +User access controls limit planning actions by role and workspace scope
- +Export and reporting workflows reduce manual schedule transcription
- –Dependency mapping and critical path style analysis are not as central as in dedicated schedule tools
- –Automation and API coverage can feel lighter for complex integrations and high event volume
- –Resource leveling and schedule optimization workflows are limited compared with full scheduling suites
- –Large schedule configurations can require more cleanup before reporting stays consistent
Best for: Fits when teams need calendar-based time planning and collaboration without building a full scheduling office.
Kelloo
SMBResource planning and portfolio management for project teams.
Program-level planning configuration that standardizes how dates, progress, and reporting views roll up across projects.
Kelloo is a time plan software system focused on planning alignment across projects, teams, and resources. It provides structured planning views that translate project plans into execution timelines with collaboration and status tracking.
The solution emphasizes iterative planning with configurable rules for task dates, progress updates, and reporting views. Kelloo also supports integration patterns for keeping plans in sync with external work tracking and reporting workflows.
- +Planning views connect work schedules to progress signals for faster plan updates
- +Collaboration workflows keep task ownership and status changes visible to stakeholders
- +Configurable planning rules support repeatable scheduling patterns across programs
- +Integration options reduce manual re-entry when syncing with external systems
- –Resource and capacity planning depth can require careful configuration for realistic scenarios
- –Dependency modeling coverage may not match dedicated critical-path planning suites
- –Reporting and export options can feel limited for highly custom governance dashboards
- –Advanced workflows depend on administrator setup more than user self-service
Best for: Fits when planning teams need repeatable scheduling views, collaboration, and reporting across multiple projects.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 business finance, Saviom stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right time plan software
Time plan software is used to turn work items into date-linked plans that teams can update through collaboration, reporting, and dependency-aware timelines. This guide covers Saviom, Teamwork.com, Smartsheet, Float, Monday.com, Asana, ClickUp, Wrike, Mosaic, and Kelloo based on scheduling behavior, plan-to-execution continuity, and how timeline updates propagate.
The later sections compare how each platform handles dependency-driven rescheduling, timeline reporting that stays tied to the same records, and plan collaboration workflows that keep discussion anchored to tasks. The comparison also accounts for automation reach and governance discipline because schedule correctness depends on how teams control changes across projects.
Time plan software for dependency-aware scheduling and plan collaboration
Time plan software manages task timelines where due dates and schedule positions change based on task fields, dependency links, and calendar rules. Saviom is built around resource-level scheduling with assignment capacity checks, so workload visibility and dependency-driven dates stay connected at the planning layer.
Teamwork.com and Smartsheet also support plan-to-execution continuity by keeping timeline context with task records, comments, and update history so schedule changes carry their rationale into execution. In practice, the category separates teams who want dependency-cascade rescheduling and resource control from teams who focus on spreadsheet-native or timeline-linked status reporting without deeper schedule optimization.
Time plan software capabilities that determine schedule correctness
Dependency-aware rescheduling is the feature that keeps dates consistent when task fields or predecessor links change. Saviom and Float both cascade timing changes through dependency relationships, while each tool differs in how far it goes into capacity and governance.
Plan reporting must stay tied to the same underlying work records so schedule updates carry context into execution. Smartsheet keeps timeline views tied to sheet rows, while Teamwork.com and Asana keep timeline context connected to task records, comments, and update history for plan-to-execution continuity.
Resource-aware dependency scheduling
Saviom ties dependency-driven dates to assignment capacity checks, so workload overload risk appears at the assignment and resource level. This makes it suited for teams managing multi-project work without drifting schedules.
Plan-to-execution continuity on task records
Teamwork.com and Asana keep timeline planning linked to task assignments, milestones, and discussion history. This reduces lost context when due dates shift during execution.
Spreadsheet-native schedule reporting
Smartsheet keeps timeline views and dashboards tied to the same underlying sheet records. Row-level dates and progress fields drive schedule views so status and reporting remain connected.
Dependency-driven drag and reschedule
Float provides dependency-aware drag-and-reschedule that cascades timing changes across predecessors and successors. Board and timeline views reduce context switching during planning edits.
Workflow gates inside the plan
Wrike enforces request and approval workflows directly inside plan execution workflows. Dependency links operate inside Gantt views, and schedule gates are enforced at the work item level.
Pick the scheduling model that matches how changes should propagate
The first decision is how schedule changes should behave when task dates, predecessor links, or milestones are edited. Some tools prioritize dependency-cascade rescheduling, while others add capacity checks or enforce approvals inside plan execution workflows.
The second decision is where planning context should live when execution starts. Tools that keep timeline context attached to task records and update history support plan-to-execution continuity, while spreadsheet-first tools keep schedule reporting tied to row records for governance lightness.
Choose dependency behavior that fits your change pattern
If dependency edits need immediate cascade across predecessor and successor timing, compare Float with Teamwork.com on dependency-based scheduling and change impact across related work. Float focuses on dependency-aware drag-and-reschedule, while Teamwork.com links timeline planning to tasks and discussion history during edits.
Select capacity control when workload overload must block reality
If plans must reflect assignment capacity at the same planning time as dependency logic, compare Saviom with Kelloo on resource and capacity depth. Saviom shows overload risk through capacity views tied to dependency-driven scheduling, while Kelloo focuses more on standardized program-level planning configuration.
Match timeline reporting to the record type your team updates
If teams enter and update planning data in spreadsheet-like structures, compare Smartsheet with Monday.com on schedule-linked reporting surfaces. Smartsheet ties timeline views to sheet row records, while Monday.com synchronizes timeline updates through automation-triggered due date, status, and notification updates.
Use workflow gates when schedule changes require approvals
If schedule changes must pass approval steps embedded in work items, compare Wrike with ClickUp on enforcement inside execution workflows. Wrike attaches schedule gates through configurable request and approval workflows, while ClickUp anchors plan evolution to automation rules tied to custom fields and task events.
Decide whether collaboration belongs inside the plan or in an adjacent system
If reviewers need collaboration attached to work item updates within calendar-based planning, compare Mosaic with Asana on how discussion attaches to schedule artifacts. Mosaic attaches commenting to work items where schedule discussions happen, while Asana routes automation and task field changes into timeline projects that visualize dependencies and milestone markers.
Stress-test complexity limits using your dependency graph size
If the planning workload includes complex multi-project dependency graphs, compare Smartsheet with Monday.com on how dependency logic behaves at scale. Smartsheet can require careful sheet modeling for advanced schedule optimization, while Monday.com can become slow to review in timeline-heavy projects with large dependency graphs.
Who should use time plan software built for dependency timelines
Planning teams need time plan software when schedules change based on task fields, dependency links, and milestone structures, and when those changes must remain auditable through execution. The right fit depends on whether teams need dependency-cascade rescheduling, capacity-aware scheduling, or collaboration anchored to task records and updates.
Organizations also differ in whether they want plan governance with defined review routines or lighter administration with schedule-linked reporting surfaces. The tools listed here split those priorities across dependency engines, record-linking behavior, and workflow enforcement.
Multi-project planning teams with assignment overload risk
Saviom fits teams that must align dependency-driven dates with assignment capacity checks so overload risk is visible at the resource and assignment level.
Planning teams that treat timeline updates as collaboration artifacts
Teamwork.com and Asana fit teams that rely on timeline context staying linked to task records, comments, and update history for plan-to-execution continuity.
Teams that standardize schedule entry using sheet records
Smartsheet fits teams that want schedule-linked reporting with a spreadsheet-native data entry model where timeline views update from row-level dates and progress fields.
Execution workflows that require schedule change approvals
Wrike fits teams that need Gantt-based dependency tracking but also require request and approval workflows to be enforced inside plan execution at the work item level.
Program planning offices that standardize how views roll up
Kelloo fits teams that need program-level planning configuration so dates, progress, and reporting views roll up across multiple projects into repeatable collaboration surfaces.
Common ways teams misuse time plan software
Schedule correctness depends on how dependency data and effort inputs are maintained, not only on which timeline UI is used. Teams also misjudge how much workflow automation and governance are required for their planning cadence.
The highest impact mistakes usually show up when dependency accuracy degrades, when schedule optimization is expected without compatible modeling, or when large dependency graphs exceed the tool’s review comfort.
Using dependency logic without enforcing dependency and milestone date hygiene
Float keeps timing consistent through dependency-aware rescheduling, but schedule outcomes still depend on dependency modeling accuracy. Teamwork.com similarly relies on consistent task date and milestone updates for dependency-based scheduling to reflect reality.
Modeling advanced scheduling goals in a spreadsheet without aligning complexity to the sheet structure
Smartsheet supports schedule-linked reporting tied to sheet records, but advanced schedule optimization needs careful sheet modeling when many dependencies span linked sheets. Float and Saviom provide clearer dependency-driven behavior during rescheduling edits when planning inputs are structured for it.
Expecting critical-path style optimization from timeline-first tools
Monday.com uses timeline views and automation-triggered updates, but critical-path style calculations are limited versus dedicated scheduling engines. Saviom is better aligned when dependency-driven scheduling and capacity control must stay consistent across task changes.
Treating capacity planning as optional when assignments are shared across projects
Saviom’s standout comes from resource-level scheduling with assignment capacity checks, so skipping that input discipline leads to misleading overload risk. Kelloo can require careful configuration for realistic resource and capacity scenarios when shared work patterns drive the plan.
Configuring governance steps without defining roles and review routines
Wrike can enforce approvals inside plan execution, but advanced planning setups require careful configuration of templates and permissions. Saviom’s multi-project governance also depends on defined roles, ownership, and review routines to maintain consistent schedule updates.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated each time plan software across scheduling behavior, plan-to-execution continuity, and collaboration mechanics tied to task records and timeline surfaces. Features accounted for 40% of the score because dependency-aware rescheduling and timeline reporting tied to the same records determine whether schedule changes stay consistent.
Ease and value each accounted for 30% because planning teams must update dependencies and timelines without creating avoidable configuration friction. Saviom ranked highest because resource-level scheduling with assignment capacity checks ties workload visibility to dependency-driven dates and keeps multi-project planning consistent when assignments span teams.
Frequently Asked Questions About time plan software
How do Saviom and Float handle dependency-driven date changes during drag-and-reschedule?
When teams need plan-linked execution updates, how do Teamwork.com and Wrike keep collaboration attached to the schedule?
What breaks if a time plan must support program-style standardization across many projects, and the tool lacks configurable rollup configuration?
Which tools provide API access for schedule data and planning events without requiring manual exports?
How do Smartsheet and ClickUp reduce re-entry when task status changes affect timeline reporting?
When security requirements include SSO and governance controls, which products support admin-level workspace management?
How do teams migrate existing schedule data into Smartsheet versus Float when the source system uses different task structures?
What tradeoff appears in Asana when planning teams need full schedule analytics like resource leveling or Monte Carlo forecasting?
Where does resource capacity visibility fall short in tools that focus on collaboration over capacity modeling?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
- Business FinanceTop 10 Best 3D Plan Software of 2026
- Business FinanceTop 10 Best Time-Tracker Software of 2026
- Business FinanceTop 10 Best Time Off Manager Software of 2026
- Business FinanceTop 10 Best Project Time Recording Software of 2026
- Business FinanceTop 10 Best Time Expense Tracking Software of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Business Finance alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of business finance tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare business finance tools→