
GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
TelecommunicationsTop 10 Best Rfid Encoding Software of 2026
Ranked comparison of rfid encoding software for card and tag programming, covering Confidex, Zebra ZXP Series 7, NFC Tools, GoToTags, BALTECH SDK.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
NFC Tools is the best fit for teams that need quick, repeatable desk encoding with read-write verification and low integration effort, whereas BALTECH SDK is the smarter move when you’re commissioning tags through BALTECH reader hardware and want device-integrated automation.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
NFC Tools
Immediate re-read verification after each write operation for quick correction of bad-tag outcomes.
Built for fits when teams need quick, repeatable desk encoding with read-write verification and minimal integration overhead..
GoToTags
Editor pickVerification-driven encoding jobs that program, read back, and apply acceptance rules per tag set.
Built for fits when operations teams need repeatable RFID encoding batches with verification-driven rejection handling..
BALTECH SDK
Editor pickRead verification integrated into the commissioning workflow to drive automatic rejection decisions.
Built for fits when teams need device-integrated, automated commissioning with verification gates..
Comparison Table
NFC Tools
SMBDesktop and mobile application for reading, writing, and encoding NFC and RFID tags across multiple platforms.
Immediate re-read verification after each write operation for quick correction of bad-tag outcomes.
NFC Tools focuses on the work between card-present interactions and encoding decisions. It handles tag scanning, payload preparation, and write operations in a single operator loop that reduces context switching. It also includes configuration screens for memory layout parameters and write options so the same workflow can be reused across batch tasks.
A tradeoff is that NFC Tools does not model multi-station industrial flows like conveyor encoding with station-level scheduling and rejection queues. It fits best when encoding volume is moderate or when engineers need fast iteration for payload formats and tag compatibility testing.
- +Fast scan to write loop reduces commissioning iteration time
- +Write-mode options and immediate re-read verification support fewer bad writes
- +Payload reuse patterns help standardize repeated tag programming tasks
- +Clear operator workflow supports desk-based encoding without extra infrastructure
- –Limited governance controls for team-wide provisioning and approvals
- –Batch throughput features lag encoding station workflows with lane-level rejection
Operations engineers
Test payload compatibility across tag batches
Fewer rework cycles during commissioning
Facilities teams
Provision access cards for events
Consistent access behavior per card
Show 1 more scenario
Integration QA
Validate reader interoperability with encoded tags
More reliable test runs
QA engineers encode controlled payloads and confirm written content before running reader-side acceptance tests.
Best for: Fits when teams need quick, repeatable desk encoding with read-write verification and minimal integration overhead.
GoToTags
SMBNFC and RFID tag encoding application for Windows supporting bulk write operations and data formatting.
Verification-driven encoding jobs that program, read back, and apply acceptance rules per tag set.
GoToTags is centered on preparing tag payloads and running encoding batches with read-write verification loops that help catch mismatches after programming. The workflow typically starts with defining tag content fields, then producing a set of tag-specific values that can be applied to cards or tags in bulk. Admin control is built around job templates and reusable configurations, which supports multi-shift execution without rewriting formats each run. Integration depth is most evident when encoding is driven from the same system that generates the payloads, because the output format aligns to downstream stations and label-print or apply workflows.
A key tradeoff is that teams must model their tag data within the platform’s configured payload structure before automation can run end-to-end. This makes GoToTags a better fit for repeatable production or staging workflows than for one-off ad hoc experiments with highly custom encoding per tag. It works well when the encoding throughput is driven by batch jobs and when rejection handling depends on post-write readbacks rather than manual spot checks.
- +Configurable tag payload templates reduce rework across encoding runs
- +Read-write verification supports automated bad-tag rejection after encoding
- +Batch job execution helps standardize dense production workflows
- +Job tracking supports audit-friendly traceability by batch and tag set
- –Tag data modeling requires upfront configuration to match target memory layouts
- –Advanced station integration may depend on connector setup and reader compatibility
- –Per-tag custom exceptions are slower than template-driven batch work
- –Some niche field mappings can require additional format configuration
Warehouse operations
Batch encode item tags for receiving
Fewer mislabeled items at dock
Asset tracking administrators
Commission serialized tags across sites
Uniform tag data across locations
Show 2 more scenarios
Manufacturing line teams
Encode tags in staged production
Higher station yield
Executes repeatable bulk jobs that match station throughput and supports post-write verification.
RFID system integrators
Automate encoding from generated tag sets
Faster commissioning deployments
Uses consistent payload outputs to reduce manual mapping between tag design and encoding stations.
Best for: Fits when operations teams need repeatable RFID encoding batches with verification-driven rejection handling.
BALTECH SDK
API-firstDeveloper SDK for reading and writing contactless smart cards and RFID tags via BALTECH reader hardware.
Read verification integrated into the commissioning workflow to drive automatic rejection decisions.
BALTECH SDK provides a programmable workflow for tag commissioning that pairs write operations with read verification so bad-tag rejection can be implemented without separate orchestration. It supports EPC Gen2v2 tag data placement across memory banks, which helps when encoding uses different reserved and user fields for application logic. Integration is geared toward deployments where encoding stations, conveyor lines, or other industrial setups call for a software-driven job pipeline.
A key tradeoff is that the SDK is most effective when paired with BALTECH hardware for which the device command set and workflow assumptions match. A common situation is a manufacturing or logistics team building an online encoding flow that correlates the identity of each tag to upstream business identifiers and blocks issuance when verification fails.
- +Programmable encoding workflow that couples write with readback verification
- +EPC Gen2v2 memory-bank mapping supports controlled field placement
- +API-driven job execution fits custom station and automation pipelines
- +Built for industrial device control rather than generic tag tooling
- –Best results depend on pairing with BALTECH reader and encoder hardware
- –Requires build effort for workflow design, error handling, and correlation logic
- –Complex field layouts need careful configuration to avoid mismatched memory writes
Warehouse automation engineers
Online tag issuance with conveyor stations
Fewer mis-issued tags in operation
Logistics system integrators
Custom issuance pipeline with tag correlation
Correct tag-to-order mapping
Show 1 more scenario
Manufacturing quality teams
Commissioning with deterministic writeback checks
Higher yield through fewer bad tags
Verification-driven commissioning provides a consistent decision point for acceptance and rework loops.
Best for: Fits when teams need device-integrated, automated commissioning with verification gates.
Loftware NiceLabel
enterpriseEnterprise labeling software with RFID smart label encoding and printer integration.
Label-to-encoding workflow linkage that keeps tag programming tied to the same controlled label content.
Loftware NiceLabel combines print and label design with tag encoding workflows for RFID use cases that need governance over what gets programmed and how it is applied. It supports centralized label management concepts that can be paired with reader and encoder connectivity for production-line commissioning.
NiceLabel is most distinct when encoding steps are tied to label artwork, inspection fields, and controlled print-apply execution. It is a fit for teams that already use label lifecycle control and want RFID tasks managed alongside the human-readable and machine-readable labeling outputs.
- +Ties encoding workflow steps to controlled label design outputs
- +Good fit for print-apply operations where label data drives commissioning
- +Handles production labeling governance patterns across sites
- +Supports integration paths that pair readers and encoders with automation
- –RFID-specific commissioning depth depends on connected components and integrations
- –Advanced verification and rejection logic often requires careful workflow design
- –Throughput tuning is constrained by the encoding station and orchestration setup
- –Requires tighter administration discipline for role separation and change control
Best for: Fits when RFID commissioning must follow label lifecycle control and production line print-apply steps.
TEKLYNX LABEL MATRIX
SMBBarcode and RFID label design software built for printer-driven encoding tasks.
Label MATRIX ties RFID write content to label job data so print-apply workflows can keep encoding parameters consistent across stations.
TEKLYNX LABEL MATRIX generates and manages label layouts for RFID tag encoding workflows, with configuration focused on consistent print and write behavior across batches. It supports tag commissioning style operations by tying tag programming data to label jobs, including EPC-related fields and memory bank targets needed for RAIN RFID use cases.
The workflow is built around controlled job content and print integration so encoding parameters travel with the production order rather than being managed separately at the encoder. Label MATRIX also offers extensibility through TEKLYNX scripting and integration options used to connect label jobs to encoding stations and verification steps.
- +Job-driven encoding parameters stay linked to the printed label layout
- +Scripting supports conditional fields for EPC formatting and memory bank writes
- +Works well with conveyor and batch production patterns where labels and tags align
- +Centralizes label templates used across encoding stations and operator workflows
- –Advanced encoding control depends on external encoder integration and device setup
- –Large scale data mapping can become complex when job inputs vary by lot
- –Troubleshooting write failures requires correlating label data with encoder logs
- –Real-time encoder telemetry and feedback are limited compared with dedicated middleware
Best for: Fits when production teams need label-managed RFID commissioning with controlled batch data mapping.
TSC Console
vertical specialistPrinter management software that supports RFID-capable TSC devices in deployment environments.
Job-driven console workflows that tie encoding parameters directly to TSC printer operations for consistent batch runs.
TSC Console is RFID encoding software from TSC that centers on printer-centered workflows for card and tag programming using TSC printing hardware. It supports encoding tasks tied to TSC printer operations, including job-driven parameterization for batch commissioning and repeatable write runs.
The tool focus fits environments that need operator-driven console control around an encoding station rather than a separate, reader-agnostic automation layer. It also aligns with print-and-encode use cases where label layouts and write parameters must stay consistent across batches.
- +Printer-centered workflow keeps print layout and write parameters aligned.
- +Console-based job control supports consistent batch commissioning runs.
- +Batch processing reduces manual key entry across repeated jobs.
- +Operator workflows are easier to standardize than code-driven encoding chains.
- –TSC hardware dependency limits integration with non-TSC encoding stations.
- –API and external automation surface is thin compared with middleware-first tools.
- –Advanced memory-bank scripting needs tighter fit to supported encoding formats.
- –Dense-reader and arbitration tuning is not exposed as a configurable layer.
Best for: Fits when teams run print-and-encode batches on TSC hardware and need console-driven repeatability.
Impinj ItemSense
enterpriseEnterprise RAIN RFID platform providing reader management, item-level data collection, and tag encoding for EPC Gen2 deployments.
Tight reader-feature alignment that keeps commissioning settings consistent with the reader’s item identification data path.
Impinj ItemSense targets RAIN RFID deployments that need more than simple tag programming through tight coupling of reader firmware features with commissioning workflows. It supports tag encoding and configuration geared toward high read-rate environments, including workflows for provisioning EPC and related memory contents.
Operational design centers on managing how tags are associated to application identifiers so systems can validate reads after deployment. For teams that already use Impinj readers, ItemSense reduces glue work by aligning encoding settings with the reader data path.
- +Reader-side alignment reduces mismatch between encoding settings and read behavior
- +Workflow focus on EPC and memory bank configuration for item-level identification
- +Supports provisioning approaches suited to high-throughput environments
- +Built around consistent tag association for downstream application mapping
- –Encoding workflows assume specific Impinj reader integration paths
- –Automation and API surface can feel incomplete versus general-purpose encoding suites
- –Governance controls for multi-team operations are not as granular as enterprise CM tools
- –Dense deployment tuning requires careful configuration to avoid misreads
Best for: Fits when Impinj reader deployments need consistent commissioning and item-level mapping without custom reconciliation scripts.
CardPresso
SMBCard design and encoding software supporting contactless smart card technologies including MIFARE, DESFire, and HID iCLASS.
Integrated read-write verification tied to each encoding job reduces bad-tag throughput waste during provisioning runs.
CardPresso focuses on RFID tag encoding workflows with support for both contactless writing and read-write verification. Encoding is organized around configurable tag data fields so operators can provision EPC and user-memory values without building a custom encoder.
The tool includes job-driven batch operations for writing many tags in a consistent pattern and checking results after each run. Administrative control is handled through role-based access patterns inside the web interface rather than a code-centric console.
- +Job-based batch encoding reduces operator variation across large tag runs
- +Read-write verification helps catch mis-writes before tags leave the station
- +Configurable field mapping supports consistent EPC and user-memory population
- +Web UI workflow fits shared workstations without per-operator script changes
- –RFID reader connectivity depends on supported reader drivers and hardware models
- –Advanced provisioning logic needs configuration discipline instead of a programmable rule engine
- –Per-tag diagnostics are limited when failures occur during high-throughput runs
- –Complex memory-bank use cases can require manual template setup per tag type
Best for: Fits when teams need template-driven batch encoding with verification for mixed tag types and controlled stations.
SpringCard
vertical specialistSmart card and RFID reader vendor offering companion software utilities for contactless card reading and encoding.
Read-write verification driven rejection of failed tags during commissioning to prevent bad-tag propagation.
SpringCard provides RFID encoding software that coordinates tag writing workflows with hardware readers and encoders for production and logistics environments. It supports common tag data areas and formats used in RAIN RFID and EPC Gen2 class deployments, with settings that cover access and kill behaviors.
The software focuses on repeatable commissioning steps such as encoding parameters, verification passes, and rejection of tags that fail write-read checks. Integration depth is driven by the supported reader and encoder control paths that fit both online encoding and station-based operations.
- +Encoding workflow supports write and read-back verification checks
- +Configuration covers access and kill state controls for Gen2 class tags
- +Works with practical encoder station flows for production batches
- +Provides predictable commissioning steps for consistent outcomes
- –Automation integration requires aligning the software with specific reader hardware
- –Advanced commissioning setups can require more configuration discipline
- –Bulk throughput tuning depends on encoder and reader capabilities
- –Complex format mappings can add project-specific implementation work
Best for: Fits when manufacturing or logistics teams need controlled, verified tag commissioning from encoder stations.
BIXOLON Label Artist-II
SMBLabel design software for BIXOLON printers with RFID encoding support on compatible models.
RFID data is managed as part of the label layout so EPC values travel with the same print definition.
BIXOLON Label Artist-II is a label design and encoding workflow for BIXOLON label printers where the same toolchain prepares graphics and writes RFID data. It supports tag commissioning through label objects that carry EPC-related values, which lets operators keep layout, serialization inputs, and printer output in one place.
The workflow emphasizes template-driven configuration for repeat jobs and reduces operator steps by combining encoding fields with the print definition. For teams that need a scanner-assisted commissioning loop, it also provides practical read-after-write checks tied to the label run.
- +Template-based RFID fields keep label layout and tag data aligned.
- +Printer-centric workflow reduces separate tooling for encoding runs.
- +Provides read-after-write verification tied to the print job.
- +Label object approach supports repeatable serialization patterns.
- –Workflow is most practical when operating within BIXOLON printer setups.
- –API integration options for external provisioning systems are limited.
Best for: Fits when operations teams need label-linked RFID encoding on BIXOLON printers without custom software integration.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 telecommunications, NFC Tools stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right rfid encoding software
RFID encoding software coordinates tag payload formatting, write operations, and read-back verification so commissioning runs can reject bad-tag outcomes instead of propagating them downstream. This guide covers NFC Tools, GoToTags, BALTECH SDK, Loftware NiceLabel, TEKLYNX LABEL MATRIX, TSC Console, Impinj ItemSense, CardPresso, SpringCard, and BIXOLON Label Artist-II.
Each tool is evaluated around integration depth, automation and API surface, and the degree of admin and governance control teams need for batch provisioning. The lineup includes desk-level workflows with immediate verification loops and printer-linked workflows where tag data travels with label layouts.
RFID encoding software for commissioning workflows, verification gates, and print-apply integration
RFID encoding software produces and applies RFID memory-bank configurations for specific tag types so EPC fields and user data land in controlled locations, then reads the tag back to confirm the write. NFC Tools is built around an immediate re-read verification loop after each write operation to support quick correction of bad-tag outcomes, while GoToTags runs verification-driven encoding jobs that program, read back, and apply acceptance rules per tag set.
Beyond the write-and-verify core, these tools differ by how they link payload generation to production data and station execution. Loftware NiceLabel and TEKLYNX LABEL MATRIX tie encoding workflow steps to controlled label design and job data so print-apply operations keep encoding parameters aligned. BALTECH SDK instead emphasizes a programmable commissioning workflow where encoding write steps and verification gates are coupled, and where correctness depends on pairing with compatible reader and encoder hardware.
Core features that control RFID encoding correctness and station throughput
RFID encoding software has to connect payload formatting to write operations and then confirm the write with read-back, because bad-tag outcomes propagate when the workflow lacks an immediate verification gate. Tools in this list differ mainly in how they run verification and how they bind encoding parameters to upstream production data.
Read-write verification loops with rejection decisions
NFC Tools performs immediate re-read verification after each write operation so operators can correct bad-tag outcomes fast. GoToTags and CardPresso run verification-driven jobs that apply acceptance rules or reject mis-writes before tags leave the station.
Workflow coupling to production data and print-apply execution
Loftware NiceLabel links label-to-encoding so tag programming follows the same controlled label content used in print-apply steps. TEKLYNX LABEL MATRIX and TSC Console tie encoding parameters to label or printer job execution to keep batch runs consistent across stations.
Commissioning workflow programmability with controlled field placement
BALTECH SDK couples encoding write steps with readback verification gates, and it provides EPC Gen2v2 memory-bank mapping so field placement stays controlled. BALTECH SDK also targets automated commissioning workflows where correlation logic must be built around specific reader and encoder hardware.
Batch job parameterization and conditional payload generation
GoToTags uses configurable tag payload templates so teams can reuse the same tag set definition across encoding runs. TEKLYNX LABEL MATRIX adds scripting-based conditional EPC formatting and memory-bank writes so mixed lots can share one job while still targeting correct memory locations.
Hardware integration boundaries and verification driver dependencies
Impinj ItemSense focuses on keeping commissioning settings aligned with Impinj reader item identification paths, which reduces mismatch risk for Impinj-centric deployments. SpringCard and CardPresso require reader connectivity that matches supported reader drivers and hardware models, which directly impacts how reliably verification and rejection can run in practice.
Choose by workflow shape: desk verification, batch acceptance rules, or print-apply linkage
The right RFID encoding software match depends on how encoding jobs get fed and how errors must be handled at station speed. Some tools run desk-level encode-write loops that optimize correction time, while others run batch acceptance rules tied to label or printer job execution.
Select desk-first verification for fast iteration at the write loop
Choose NFC Tools when the workflow needs quick repeatability where each write is followed by an immediate re-read verification step. This selection fits teams that want fewer commissioning iterations because operators can correct bad-tag outcomes in the same session.
Select batch jobs with acceptance rules when mixed tag sets are common
Choose GoToTags when encoding must run as verification-driven jobs that program, read back, and apply acceptance rules per tag set. This selection fits operations teams that need repeatable batch commissioning runs where mis-writes get rejected automatically after encoding.
Select print-apply linkage when label content is the commissioning source of truth
Choose Loftware NiceLabel when controlled label lifecycle outputs must drive tag encoding steps so print-apply operations keep payloads aligned. Choose TEKLYNX LABEL MATRIX when job-driven encoding parameter mapping and scripting-based conditional fields are required across multiple stations.
Select programmable commissioning workflows when correctness requires custom correlation logic
Choose BALTECH SDK when the commissioning process must couple write steps with readback verification gates and embed correlation logic in the workflow. This selection is most practical when engineering time can be allocated to workflow design, error handling, and correlation beyond what label-driven systems provide.
Select printer-centric tooling for TSC hardware runs with tight batch repeatability
Choose TSC Console when print-and-encode batches run on TSC hardware and console-driven job control is the operational model. This selection trades broader middleware-style automation for simpler alignment between printer operations and write parameters.
Select reader-path alignment for Impinj-centric deployments
Choose Impinj ItemSense when commissioning settings must stay aligned with Impinj reader item identification data paths. This selection reduces custom reconciliation work, but it assumes the encoding workflow follows Impinj-specific reader integration paths.
Who benefits from these RFID encoding software workflows
Encoding teams benefit when software binds write operations to verification gates and connects payload configuration to the data source used in production. Operations teams also benefit when governance controls prevent inconsistent provisioning across batch runs and station operators.
Manufacturing lines that use label-driven print-apply
Teams running production jobs where tag data must track the same controlled label outputs should evaluate Loftware NiceLabel and TEKLYNX LABEL MATRIX because both link encoding workflow steps to label or job design outputs.
Warehouse and logistics operations running verification-gated batches
Teams that need repeatable encoding batches with automated bad-tag rejection should evaluate GoToTags and CardPresso because both center read-write verification and rejection behavior around tag sets or encoding jobs.
Engineering teams building custom commissioning flows
Organizations that need programmable encoding workflows with workflow-level verification gates should evaluate BALTECH SDK because it integrates read verification into commissioning and supports EPC Gen2v2 memory-bank mapping for controlled field placement.
Teams using desk-level commissioning where throughput comes from fast correction
Operators that prioritize rapid encode-write-loop iteration should evaluate NFC Tools because it performs immediate re-read verification after each write operation to reduce time spent on repeated bad-tag outcomes.
Impinj reader deployments focused on minimizing mismatch risk
Deployments tied to Impinj readers should evaluate Impinj ItemSense because it aligns commissioning settings with the reader's item identification data path without requiring custom reconciliation scripts.
Common pitfalls during RFID encoding software selection and rollout
Wrong software selection often breaks when encoding parameters do not match the station workflow shape or when read-back verification does not drive rejection decisions. The most frequent issues occur when teams assume automation exists for their station hardware path or when they underestimate the configuration work needed for memory-layout accuracy.
Buying verification software but relying on manual correction instead of automated rejection gates
NFC Tools and SpringCard both center verification-driven behavior, so selection should favor tools that can turn read-back results into explicit rejection decisions for the next tag in the run.
Tying encoding parameters to label content without checking integration depth to the connected components
Loftware NiceLabel and TEKLYNX LABEL MATRIX can keep encoding tied to controlled label workflows, but RFID commissioning depth still depends on how the connected encoder components and integrations support the required memory-bank writes.
Expecting broad station compatibility when reader connectivity depends on supported drivers and hardware models
CardPresso and SpringCard depend on supported reader drivers and hardware models, so procurement should validate that the planned station hardware path matches the software's reader connectivity assumptions.
Choosing a general desk workflow when print-apply is the operational source of truth
If encoding parameters must stay aligned with print jobs, TEKLYNX LABEL MATRIX and Loftware NiceLabel tie job-driven content to encoding steps, while desk-first tools may require separate operational controls to keep label and tag data synchronized.
Underestimating the workflow build effort for programmability-first systems
BALTECH SDK can couple write steps with read verification gates and EPC Gen2v2 memory-bank mapping, but it still requires workflow design, error handling, and correlation logic work around specific reader and encoder hardware.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated tools using feature depth first, then operational ease, then value for the actual encoding workflow shape used in commissioning runs. Features counted for 40% of the score because the lineup must support write operations plus read-back verification and reject failed tags instead of just logging results.
Ease and value each counted for 30% because station operators need repeatable job execution, and teams need manageable configuration when tag payload templates or workflow wiring are involved. NFC Tools separated itself in the evaluation because the workflow includes immediate re-read verification after each write operation, which reduces iteration time when bad-tag outcomes occur during provisioning.
Frequently Asked Questions About rfid encoding software
Which tool supports tight read-after-write verification during desk encoding?
How does GoToTags handle bulk encoding jobs and traceability across large batches?
Which option fits API-driven commissioning that embeds into a custom issuance workflow?
How is label lifecycle governance applied to RFID encoding steps in production?
Which tool is designed for print-and-encode batches on printer-centered hardware?
When should ItemSense be chosen for deployments tied to reader firmware item identification data?
What breaks if verification-driven rejection is not enforced during commissioning?
How do encoding station workflows differ between card and tag use cases?
Where does access and kill behavior configuration usually fit across these tools?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Telecommunications alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of telecommunications tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare telecommunications tools→