GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Food Service RestaurantsTop 10 Best Restaurant Review Software of 2026
Top 10 restaurant review software tools ranked for managing online reputation. Includes technical comparison of Podium, GatherUp, NiceJob for teams.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Podium is the best pick if you run a multi-location restaurant and want centralized review collection plus a streamlined response workflow without custom development, while Reputation.com fits larger groups that need permissioned, governed multi-location review routing and operations.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Podium
Location-aware review response templating tied to centralized review handling across a multi-location team.
Built for fits when multi-location restaurants need centralized review response workflows without building custom tooling..
GatherUp
Editor pickMulti-location review dashboard that ties solicitation performance to outlet-level review velocity tracking.
Built for fits when multi-location teams need consistent solicitation and response workflows across outlets..
NiceJob
Editor pickReview alert routing with location-specific assignment and response tracking across a portfolio.
Built for fits when multi-location restaurant teams need review routing, templated responses, and reporting in one workflow..
Related reading
- Food Service RestaurantsTop 10 Best Restaurant Feedback Software of 2026
- Food Service RestaurantsTop 10 Best Restaurant Menu Display Software of 2026
- Food Service RestaurantsTop 10 Best Point Of Sale Restaurant Software of 2026
- Food Service RestaurantsTop 10 Best Restaurant Business Intelligence Software of 2026
Comparison Table
Podium
SMBInteraction management platform with review collection and messaging.
Location-aware review response templating tied to centralized review handling across a multi-location team.
Podium is designed around a post-visit review solicitation workflow that can trigger survey and review prompts after a guest interaction. Review response templating helps teams standardize replies while still customizing key details per location. Multi-location dashboard views review velocity so teams can spot slower periods and route responses to the right owner.
A key tradeoff is that deeper POS and reservation connectivity depends on specific integration paths rather than a single universal connector. Podium fits best when a restaurant group needs consistent solicitation and response timing across multiple locations and wants centralized routing and templated replies.
- +Review solicitation triggers are built for post-visit feedback timing
- +Reply templates reduce per-response work across busy shifts
- +Multi-location routing keeps ownership clear for different restaurants
- +Review dashboard supports review velocity tracking across locations
- –POS and reservation coverage varies by integration path
- –Aspect-based sentiment depth can lag behind specialist analytics tools
- –Automation settings require careful placement of prompts by location
Restaurant group operators
Centralize review replies across locations
Faster response times
Reputation marketing managers
Improve solicitation follow-up timing
More consistent review volume
Show 2 more scenarios
Guest experience leads
Route negative feedback to owners
Quicker issue resolution
Review alerts route issues to the right location queue for timely follow-up.
Franchise operations managers
Manage franchise hierarchy permissions
Cleaner governance
Hierarchy controls support different visibility levels across brand units and locations.
Best for: Fits when multi-location restaurants need centralized review response workflows without building custom tooling.
More related reading
GatherUp
SMBCustomer feedback and review management platform for local businesses.
Multi-location review dashboard that ties solicitation performance to outlet-level review velocity tracking.
GatherUp’s core workflow starts with post-visit feedback requests that can be triggered after dining interactions, then funnels results into centralized review aggregation. Review responses use templated content so teams can standardize tone while still addressing specific comments. The multi-location dashboard supports separate reporting views that help franchise operators and area managers track distribution of star ratings and review volume over time.
A tradeoff appears in governance and process discipline. Teams must manage message approvals and escalation rules so review alerts and routing do not overwhelm managers. GatherUp fits best when operational ownership of responses and request prompts is assigned per location, and a single dashboard is used to coordinate execution during weekly reporting cycles.
- +Location-aware review aggregation with centralized activity visibility
- +Templated review response workflow for faster, consistent replies
- +Automated solicitation prompts tied to post-visit timing
- +Dashboards support review velocity tracking across outlets
- –Routing and escalation require clear internal ownership to stay under control
- –Advanced moderation and policy controls depend on careful configuration
- –POS and reservation integration depth varies by stack and setup effort
- –Template customization can lag behind highly individualized brand guidelines
Franchise operations managers
Track reviews per outlet, enforce response consistency
More consistent review handling
Restaurant marketing coordinators
Run post-visit request prompts with tracking
Higher review solicitation coverage
Show 2 more scenarios
Customer experience leads
Route critical feedback to the right role
Faster issue response cycle
Leads set up alert routing so urgent comments reach owners quickly.
Regional brand owners
Benchmark star distribution across markets
Sharper performance benchmarking
Owners review star rating distribution trends across locations for comparison and coaching.
Best for: Fits when multi-location teams need consistent solicitation and response workflows across outlets.
NiceJob
SMBReputation marketing platform automating review collection for local businesses.
Review alert routing with location-specific assignment and response tracking across a portfolio.
NiceJob centers on a structured review solicitation workflow that can be attached to post-visit timing and guest prompts like QR feedback. Review response templating helps standardize replies while keeping ownership clear for multi-location teams. Multi-location dashboards provide star distribution and review velocity tracking so trends are visible at location and portfolio levels.
A key tradeoff is that deeper automation depends on how the restaurant wires events and publishing steps into NiceJob, which adds setup work for complex ops. NiceJob fits best when a restaurant group needs consistent review routing and response SLAs across many locations, not when one location only needs basic posting links.
- +Review response templating standardizes replies across locations
- +Multi-location dashboards make review velocity and star distribution actionable
- +Review alert routing reduces time between new reviews and responses
- +Post-visit solicitation triggers support consistent guest feedback capture
- –Complex event wiring can require stronger internal governance
- –Advanced workflow changes typically need admin time and testing
- –Some integrations may demand ongoing attention to data sync health
- –Large franchise hierarchies can increase approval and routing complexity
Multi-location operations teams
Route reviews to the right manager
Faster, consistent review replies
Guest feedback coordinators
Trigger post-visit review requests
Higher review capture rate
Show 2 more scenarios
Franchise administrators
Manage hierarchy permissions for owners
Safer decentralized operations
Control who can respond and view reporting within franchise location groups.
Marketing and reputation analysts
Track velocity and distribution shifts
Quicker trend detection
Use star distribution and review velocity tracking to spot changes across locations.
Best for: Fits when multi-location restaurant teams need review routing, templated responses, and reporting in one workflow.
ReviewTrackers
SMBOnline review management and aggregation platform for multi-location businesses.
Franchise hierarchy permissions with location-aware workflow ownership for teams managing shared brand standards.
ReviewTrackers focuses on gathering restaurant reviews from multiple sources and routing them into one management workflow. It supports review response templating, multi-location dashboards, and review alert routing so teams can react consistently.
The product also includes review solicitation tooling with on-site and post-visit triggers designed for faster feedback-loop cycles. Admin workflows emphasize franchise hierarchy permissions to keep location ownership and visibility aligned.
- +Multi-location dashboard keeps review status visible across brands and branches.
- +Review response templating standardizes tone while preserving per-location context.
- +Review alert routing reduces missed reviews by pushing items to the right owners.
- +Franchise hierarchy permissions support role separation across parent and locations.
- –Setup effort is higher when aggregating many sources and locations at once.
- –Automation options are clearer for review handling than for deeper guest insights.
- –Comment moderation is limited to basic queues compared with newsroom-style workflows.
- –Export formats are adequate but lack fine-grained, schema-stable reporting outputs.
Best for: Fits when a multi-location restaurant group needs review response workflow control and routed alerts without custom development.
Grade.us
SMBReview management and monitoring tool for agencies and local businesses.
Review alert routing that assigns urgency by rating and directs items into a moderation and response workflow.
Grade.us collects guest ratings and written feedback through on-site prompts and then routes results into staff-facing workflows for moderation and response. The system supports multi-location review management with consolidated reporting and response templating for faster replies.
Integration options focus on reputation workflows such as business profile syncing and review solicitation triggers tied to visits. Automation is centered on alert routing and feedback handling so operational issues and low ratings reach the right team.
- +Multi-location dashboards consolidate review activity and reply status
- +Moderation queue reduces time spent triaging new comments
- +Response templating speeds consistent answers across locations
- +Alert routing sends low ratings to the right internal owner
- –Advanced automation rules require careful setup to avoid misrouting
- –Sentiment and aspect tagging are less actionable than manual tagging for edge cases
- –Limited visibility into raw review ingestion events compared with audit-heavy systems
- –Less flexible exports for analysts who need custom column layouts
Best for: Fits when restaurant groups need automated review triage and response workflow across locations.
Statusbrew
SMBSocial media management platform with review monitoring capabilities.
Role-based review response governance combined with property-level assignment in a single multi-location workflow.
Statusbrew is a reputation management workflow tool built around managing guest reviews across multiple locations. It centralizes review monitoring and response actions, and it adds automation features for routing and templating so teams can act consistently.
Statusbrew also supports integrations that matter for restaurant operations, including social listening inputs and Google Business Profile review activity. For restaurant groups and franchise-style org charts, it focuses on permissioning and review response governance so the right users handle the right properties.
- +Multi-location review inbox supports fast triage and consistent responses
- +Automation for review response routing reduces missed alerts
- +Google Business Profile review activity can be monitored from one console
- +Permission controls support franchise-style separation of duties
- –Deeper automation needs workflow configuration discipline
- –Some restaurant-specific workflows require tighter process mapping to fit
- –Advanced reporting depends on exports or configured views
- –API-based customization is not as straightforward as UI-first teams expect
Best for: Fits when multi-location restaurant teams need governed review responses plus automation.
Womply
SMBLocal business platform with reputation management and review tools.
Review response workflow with templated replies and review alert routing by location.
Womply focuses on reputation management for restaurants that need review acquisition, response drafting, and multi-location visibility in one workflow. The system ties review solicitation to post-visit triggers and lets staff generate replies to common themes without manually re-sorting feedback each day.
Womply also provides review aggregation and performance tracking across locations so managers can spot emerging issues and review velocity shifts. The automation and notification paths reduce the time between a new review and an assigned response task.
- +Review solicitation workflow connects guest feedback requests to ongoing collection
- +Multi-location dashboard supports centralized monitoring across multiple listings
- +Response templating speeds replies and standardizes tone across staff
- +Alert routing helps route new reviews to the right location owner
- –Automation coverage depends on how the restaurant configures feedback triggers
- –Aspect-based sentiment depth is uneven across review text lengths
- –CSV export is available but can require manual cleanup for analysis pipelines
- –Operational issue tagging needs consistent staff naming conventions
Best for: Fits when multi-location operators need review solicitation, monitoring, and templated responses with daily routing.
GetMoreReviews
SMBReview generation platform for local businesses and franchises.
A response task queue linked to the solicitation workflow helps teams route and complete replies without losing context.
GetMoreReviews is a restaurant review management solution built around collecting guest feedback and using it in a closed loop with responses. The workflow supports review solicitation through branded prompts and funnels both ratings and written comments into a centralized dashboard for multi-location review oversight.
Teams can draft and schedule reply templates and track response timing so operational owners can keep up with review velocity. Automation focus centers on converting post-visit signals into actionable tasks rather than only displaying reviews.
- +Review solicitation workflow that converts feedback moments into tracked submissions
- +Multi-location dashboard for managing responses and visibility across locations
- +Reply templating cuts time spent drafting responses to new reviews
- +Centralized review task queue supports consistent routing and follow-through
- –Limited guidance for complex franchise hierarchies and role-based approval flows
- –Automation depends on timely workflow setup for consistent handoff into response tasks
- –Sentiment analysis depth is less granular than tools that support aspect-based tagging
- –CSV export coverage can be thin for deeper analytics needs like distribution modeling
Best for: Fits when restaurant groups need consistent review solicitation, templated replies, and a single place to manage response work.
Birdeye
SMBReputation management and customer experience platform for local businesses.
Review response templates tied to franchise hierarchy permissions let distributed teams respond with consistent messaging across locations.
Birdeye centralizes restaurant reputation management by aggregating reviews across major sources and providing response tooling for staff. Review solicitation workflows support post-visit triggers and QR code feedback prompts, which help drive consistent review velocity.
Multi-location dashboards consolidate star rating distribution, review trends, and alert routing so operators can spot issues tied to specific locations. Integration coverage includes POS integrations and Google Business Profile sync, which reduces manual data matching across channels.
- +Multi-location dashboards consolidate review trends by location
- +Review response templating speeds replies while keeping messaging consistent
- +Review solicitation supports QR prompts and post-visit triggers
- +Alert routing helps route new reviews to the right team
- –Some workflow automation requires careful setup across locations
- –Comment moderation queues lack granular per-channel rules
- –Data refresh timing can lag without monitoring API polling behavior
- –Aspect-based sentiment coverage may not match every industry phrasing
Best for: Fits when multi-location restaurants need centralized review aggregation, templated responses, and routed alerts without custom development.
Reputation.com
enterpriseEnterprise reputation management and customer experience platform.
Review response templating tied to live review monitoring so routed alerts and reply drafts stay aligned per location.
Reputation.com fits restaurant groups that need structured post-visit feedback workflows across multiple locations with centralized review management. It supports review solicitation and response workflows that connect review monitoring to templated replies and operational follow-ups.
The administration layer supports multi-location reporting and permissioning suited to franchised hierarchies. Built-in integrations focus on mapping review activity to real business entities so teams can route issues and track performance over time.
- +Centralized review response templating for multi-location operations
- +Review solicitation workflow designed for post-visit triggers
- +Integration-focused monitoring to route alerts to the right team
- +Reporting that groups performance by location and venue type
- –Multi-location configuration needs careful governance of permissions
- –Advanced workflow automation takes time to align with store processes
- –Some feedback actions depend on integration availability
- –Outbound messaging rules can feel restrictive for unique brand voices
Best for: Fits when a restaurant group needs multi-location review response workflows and permissioned operations without custom development.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 food service restaurants, Podium stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right restaurant review software
This guide covers restaurant review software used for collecting guest feedback, aggregating reviews from multiple channels, and routing responses across locations. It includes Podium, GatherUp, NiceJob, ReviewTrackers, Grade.us, Statusbrew, Womply, GetMoreReviews, Birdeye, and Reputation.com.
Each tool is mapped to concrete workflows such as post-visit solicitation prompts, location-aware reply templating, review alert routing, and multi-location dashboards for response tracking. The guide also calls out where implementations tend to break, including moderation governance and automation wiring across many outlets.
Restaurant review management and response workflows for multi-location teams
Restaurant review software centralizes review aggregation, response drafting, and review solicitation into one operational loop for restaurants. It solves problems like slow response times, inconsistent replies across locations, and missing context when reviews arrive from different sources.
Tools like Podium and GatherUp connect post-visit review prompts to a routed response queue so staff can act on new feedback without manually sorting items by outlet. Multi-location teams typically use these platforms to manage accountability, track review velocity, and keep messaging consistent across a portfolio.
Mechanisms that decide whether a review workflow stays consistent at scale
Different restaurant teams optimize for different stages of the review lifecycle, so evaluation should start with the workflow mechanics rather than the marketing promise. Focus on how review items move from solicitation to inbox to routing to reply templates to moderation.
The strongest tools also control governance so location owners and franchise roles can handle the right properties. Podium, NiceJob, and Statusbrew show how these mechanics translate into day-to-day operational speed and accountability.
Location-aware reply templating tied to centralized review handling
Reply templates that render per location reduce per-response work and prevent brand drift across outlets. Podium’s location-aware templating links directly to centralized multi-location handling, and Reputation.com ties reply drafts to live monitoring so drafts stay aligned to the correct property.
Review alert routing with property-level assignment and response tracking
Routing determines who gets new reviews and how quickly responses get completed. NiceJob routes alerts to location-specific assignment with response tracking, while Grade.us assigns urgency by rating and directs items into moderation and response workflows.
Post-visit solicitation triggers and feedback prompts
Solicitation triggers decide whether feedback requests land at the right moment and whether review velocity improves. Podium and GatherUp use automated prompts tied to post-visit timing, and Birdeye adds QR code feedback prompts on top of post-visit triggers.
Multi-location dashboards that track review velocity and star rating distribution
Reporting should connect review outcomes to operations so managers can spot emerging issues by outlet. GatherUp ties solicitation performance to outlet-level review velocity tracking, while NiceJob and Birdeye make multi-location reporting actionable through star distribution and review trend views.
Franchise or portfolio permissions that separate access by hierarchy
Permissioning prevents approvals and reply actions from spilling across brands and branches. ReviewTrackers uses franchise hierarchy permissions with location-aware workflow ownership, and Statusbrew combines role-based governance with property-level assignment in one workflow.
Action queues that preserve context from solicitation to reply completion
A task queue reduces drop-offs when multiple staff members handle different steps of the loop. GetMoreReviews links a response task queue to the solicitation workflow so teams route and complete replies without losing context, and ReviewTrackers consolidates routed items into one management workflow for portfolio teams.
Pick the review workflow model that matches the operating structure
Restaurant review tools vary most in how they wire events and who owns the next action after a review arrives. The decision framework below maps choices to operating reality like franchise hierarchy, outlet staffing, and how much workflow governance teams can sustain.
The goal is to pick a tool whose routing, templating, and solicitation mechanics match internal handoffs. Podium and GatherUp fit teams that want centralized workflows, while ReviewTrackers and Statusbrew fit teams that require hierarchy-first permissions.
Choose centralized vs governed property ownership
Teams that need centralized visibility with location routing tend to do well with Podium or GatherUp because centralized review handling and outlet-level dashboards keep ownership clear. Teams that require explicit franchise hierarchy separation and permissioned response governance should evaluate ReviewTrackers or Statusbrew because they emphasize franchise or role-based controls tied to location assignment.
Verify that routing matches the response workflow timeline
If reviews must be assigned quickly and tracked to completion, NiceJob’s review alert routing with response tracking is built for that operational loop. If low ratings should trigger the right internal triage path, Grade.us routes items into moderation and response workflows based on rating urgency.
Confirm solicitation timing matches how visits flow in the real restaurant
If guest prompts should fire after a visit event, Podium and GatherUp support post-visit solicitation triggers tied to automated request timing. If QR code feedback capture is part of the guest flow, Birdeye’s QR prompt capability plus post-visit triggers can fit operational signage and receipts.
Decide how much template consistency is allowed vs how much customization is needed
If consistent brand replies across shifts matter more than heavily personalized wording, Podium and NiceJob both use response templating to reduce per-response work. If templates must follow strict brand guidelines at the outlet level, GatherUp and Womply can still fit but require careful template setup to avoid lag in highly individualized brand requirements.
Stress test automation wiring across many outlets before scaling
For automation-driven routing and event wiring, tools like NiceJob and Statusbrew can require stronger internal governance because workflow changes often need admin time and testing. If complex franchise hierarchies are involved, ReviewTrackers provides hierarchy permissions but still requires planning for aggregation and multi-source setup when many sources and locations start at once.
Map export and reporting expectations to the decision makers
If analysts need fine-grained reporting outputs, ReviewTrackers’ exports can be less schema-stable than teams expect, and Grade.us offers exports that can be thin for deeper analytics pipelines. If reporting mainly supports daily operational triage like velocity and routing outcomes, multi-location dashboards in GatherUp and Birdeye generally align with that use case.
Which restaurant teams benefit from these review workflow tools
Restaurant review software fits teams where review volume creates operational load and where replies must stay consistent across multiple locations. Tools in this category are most useful when review handling requires routing, templating, and tracking rather than manual triage.
The best-fit selection depends on how properties are staffed and whether hierarchy permissions control access. Podium and GatherUp target centralized handling, while ReviewTrackers and Statusbrew emphasize permissioned operations.
Multi-location operators that want centralized review handling with outlet-level routing
Podium and GatherUp support centralized visibility with multi-location review dashboards and templates tied to outlet workflows. This model fits portfolios where managers need one operational view while location teams still receive property-specific assignment.
Multi-location teams that need faster response turnaround with alert-based routing
NiceJob and Grade.us reduce response delays by routing review alerts and tracking response actions to location owners. These tools fit teams where review velocity tracking and star rating outcomes must translate into quick operational follow-through.
Franchise-style organizations that require hierarchy permissions and separation of duties
ReviewTrackers and Statusbrew focus on franchise hierarchy permissions or role-based governance tied to property-level assignment. This fits organizations where approval steps and response responsibilities must follow brand and location boundaries.
Operations teams using QR code feedback prompts and standardized review capture moments
Birdeye fits when QR prompts and post-visit triggers are part of how restaurants collect feedback. It also suits distributed teams that want centralized aggregation with routed alerts and consistent reply templates.
Restaurant groups that want a single queue that ties solicitation to reply completion
GetMoreReviews emphasizes a response task queue linked to the solicitation workflow so teams can complete replies without losing context. This fits operations where the hardest part is closing the loop end to end rather than only viewing new review items.
Where restaurant review software projects fail in real operations
Restaurant review workflows fail when routing, templates, and automation events are configured without matching internal ownership. Several tools require governance discipline so that new reviews do not get misassigned or handled inconsistently across locations.
Other failures happen when teams overestimate sentiment tagging depth or export flexibility for downstream analytics. The pitfalls below map to concrete limitations seen across the reviewed platforms.
Setting up automation without location-by-location ownership rules
Automation settings need careful placement by location in Podium, and event wiring can demand stronger internal governance in NiceJob. A practical fix is to define which role owns which property queue before enabling automated solicitation triggers and routing.
Underestimating franchise and approval complexity for large portfolios
GetMoreReviews and ReviewTrackers can require more planning when franchise hierarchy and role-based approval flows are complex. A practical fix is to prototype permissioning and escalation paths in Statusbrew or ReviewTrackers with a subset of outlets before onboarding the full portfolio.
Relying on aspect-based sentiment for operational decisions without fallback tagging
Podium and Womply note uneven or lagging aspect-based sentiment depth, and Grade.us sentiment and aspect tagging can be less actionable for edge cases. A practical fix is to pair routing rules with manual moderation queue workflows so low ratings still drive triage even when sentiment tagging is shallow.
Assuming exports will match analyst-grade reporting needs
ReviewTrackers’ export formats can lack fine-grained, schema-stable reporting outputs, and Grade.us exports can be less flexible for custom column layouts. A practical fix is to align the reporting model to operational dashboards like review velocity tracking and routing outcomes first, then test export needs for deeper analysis.
Failing to maintain moderation and policy configuration discipline
GatherUp and Grade.us describe moderation and advanced automation behavior that depends on careful configuration to avoid misrouting. A practical fix is to set clear escalation rules and moderation queue ownership before expanding solicitation triggers across locations.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Podium, GatherUp, NiceJob, ReviewTrackers, Grade.us, Statusbrew, Womply, GetMoreReviews, Birdeye, and Reputation.com on feature coverage, ease of use, and value using the reported capabilities and stated usability and implementation constraints. The overall rating used a weighted average where features carried the most weight, while ease of use and value each contributed equally to the final score. This scoring reflects the operational reality that review routing, templating, and solicitation wiring determine throughput more than surface-level interface preferences.
Podium stands out because its location-aware review response templating is tied to centralized review handling for multi-location teams, and that alignment shows up as exceptionally high features and ease of use ratings along with strong performance for review velocity tracking across locations.
Frequently Asked Questions About restaurant review software
How do Podium and NiceJob handle multi-location review response workflows?
Which tools prioritize review solicitation prompts tied to visits or post-visit triggers?
How do the tools route reviews to the right team without manual sorting?
What API or integration coverage matters most for restaurant reputation workflows?
How does data migration work when moving from spreadsheets or legacy review tools?
Which products support franchise permissions and multi-location hierarchy controls?
What breaks if review response templates are missing or inconsistent across locations?
When should an organization choose a routed alert workflow over a shared dashboard?
What security controls are typically required for admin access and auditability?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Food Service Restaurants alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of food service restaurants tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare food service restaurants tools→