GITNUXSOFTWARE REVIEW
Environment EnergyTop 12 Best Renewable Energy Asset Management Software of 2026
Compare renewable energy asset management software for portfolio teams, with market notes on SkySpecs Horizon and key tradeoffs to review.
How we ranked these tools
Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.
Search agents gather the source set and the review record, including transcriptions of video reviews and podcasts.
Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
SkySpecs Horizon is the best pick for O&M teams running fleet monitoring that directly triggers maintenance actions, because its event-driven workflow mapping turns monitoring signals into planned work across sites, while eMaint CMMS is the better fit for maintenance teams that need CMMS-style work order control with auditable asset history.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
SkySpecs Horizon
Event-driven maintenance workflow mapping that turns monitoring signals into planned work actions across sites.
Best for: Fits when O&M teams need fleet monitoring that directly triggers maintenance execution.
meteocontrol VCOM
Editor pickPlant-to-portfolio normalization that keeps performance reporting consistent across heterogeneous monitoring sources.
Best for: Fits when operators need governed fleet monitoring plus operational workflows across many PV sites.
Raptor Maps
Editor pickMap-driven asset management that ties workflow tasks to specific, navigable locations for field validation.
Best for: Fits when operators need geospatial asset management with structured inspections and maintenance workflows.
Comparison Table
SkySpecs Horizon
vertical specialistSkySpecs Horizon manages wind asset data, inspections, maintenance planning, and operational decisions.
Event-driven maintenance workflow mapping that turns monitoring signals into planned work actions across sites.
SkySpecs Horizon centralizes asset telemetry, applies operational rules, and routes outputs into maintenance workflows used by O&M teams. It supports fleet-level views that help compare sites, track trends, and identify assets needing attention based on observed behavior. The automation surface is oriented around event-like signals and repeatable operational tasks rather than manual spreadsheet cycles.
A tradeoff appears in governance effort when organizations require strict role separation across technicians, engineers, and managers. Horizon fits best when teams already standardize how alarms and maintenance actions map to internal procedures, then need consistent execution across many assets.
- +Telemetry-to-work-order linkage reduces time from signal to action
- +Fleet comparisons highlight recurring underperforming assets
- +Automation rules support repeatable maintenance workflows
- +Cross-site reporting supports consistent O&M reviews
- –Role separation needs deliberate setup to prevent access sprawl
- –External data pipelines require engineering attention for best coverage
- –Complex workflows take longer to model than simple monitoring
Wind O&M coordinators
Trigger maintenance from turbine anomalies
Faster anomaly remediation
PV plant managers
Standardize inverter and string monitoring
Lower recurring performance loss
Show 2 more scenarios
Asset performance analysts
Benchmark sites using operational signals
Clearer fleet improvement targets
Compare assets and sites based on tracked behavior patterns and maintenance history.
Engineering operations leads
Coordinate multi-site maintenance governance
More controlled O&M outcomes
Apply consistent configuration and oversight across distributed assets to maintain execution quality.
Best for: Fits when O&M teams need fleet monitoring that directly triggers maintenance execution.
meteocontrol VCOM
vertical specialistVCOM monitors photovoltaic plants and supports technical operations, reporting, and portfolio management.
Plant-to-portfolio normalization that keeps performance reporting consistent across heterogeneous monitoring sources.
VCOM centralizes plant telemetry and measurement sources so teams can track generation behavior and performance trends over time instead of relying on ad hoc spreadsheets. The system supports automated ingestion from plant monitoring setups and provides reporting views used for asset performance management and operational review. It also supports structured workflows for operational tasks, which reduces the need to translate findings from monitoring tools into separate maintenance trackers.
A tradeoff is that deep integration and data normalization depend on well-defined plant data mappings and consistent naming across sites. VCOM fits best when an organization already has monitoring sources in place and wants repeatable fleet-level reporting plus operational workflows across multiple assets.
- +Fleet monitoring uses consistent plant ingestion and normalized production views
- +Operational workflows reduce manual handoffs between monitoring and maintenance planning
- +Integration focus supports SCADA and energy management system style telemetry feeds
- +RBAC-style governance supports multi-site teams with separate roles
- –Requires disciplined site configuration for consistent asset mapping
- –Advanced analytics depth can depend on integration completeness per plant
- –Workflow customization can be slower than generic work order tools
- –Report tailoring may require admin involvement for large portfolios
PV operations analysts
Track underperformance across a fleet
Faster root-cause targeting
Renewable asset managers
Standardize performance reporting cadence
Lower reporting effort
Show 2 more scenarios
O&M planners
Convert monitoring signals into tasks
Reduced manual tracking
Planners use operational workflows to route findings into maintenance planning and execution cycles.
Portfolio IT and integration teams
Connect plant telemetry sources
More reliable data flow
Integration teams configure data ingestion so telemetry and monitoring outputs land in shared monitoring constructs.
Best for: Fits when operators need governed fleet monitoring plus operational workflows across many PV sites.
Raptor Maps
vertical specialistRaptor Maps coordinates solar asset inspections, work orders, field data, and performance analysis.
Map-driven asset management that ties workflow tasks to specific, navigable locations for field validation.
Raptor Maps is most distinct for geospatial anchoring of asset and work activity, because asset pages and workflow steps are organized around locations that teams can validate in the field. The workflow layer supports recurring inspection and maintenance activities with structured statuses that can be tracked from initiation through closure. Reporting and exports are geared toward operational visibility at the site and portfolio levels rather than deep engineering modeling.
A tradeoff appears when organizations need heavy SCADA or historian-scale analytics, because Raptor Maps emphasizes asset and maintenance workflows instead of supervisory control integrations and time-series computation. It fits best when a wind or solar operations team needs a single place to reconcile asset metadata, inspection findings, and follow-on work orders for defined locations.
- +Location-first asset records improve field-to-back-office traceability
- +Inspection and maintenance workflows keep status visible across teams
- +Portfolio views support cross-site operational reporting
- +Configurable asset hierarchies map to real site structures
- –SCADA and historian integrations are not its core strength
- –Data must be provisioned to match its asset and workflow structure
- –Advanced analytics like performance ratio modeling needs external systems
- –Complex governance requires disciplined configuration and role setup
Wind O and M teams
Manage turbine inspections by location
Faster closure of recurring defects
Solar operations managers
Coordinate inverter and plant maintenance
Higher maintenance throughput per site
Show 2 more scenarios
Renewable asset managers
Audit work history across portfolios
Clearer operational accountability
Use portfolio reporting to review completed maintenance and inspection outcomes by asset and location.
Engineering program coordinators
Reconcile asset records during upgrades
Fewer mismatches between teams
Update asset metadata tied to sites so engineering plans and operational execution reference the same assets.
Best for: Fits when operators need geospatial asset management with structured inspections and maintenance workflows.
eMaint CMMS
SMBMaintenance management software used by renewable energy operators for preventive maintenance and asset tracking.
Work order history stays tightly linked to each asset record, so maintenance outcomes remain traceable during audits and root-cause reviews.
eMaint CMMS is a maintenance-focused system for tracking renewable energy assets through work order execution and lifecycle routines. The product centers on preventive maintenance scheduling, asset hierarchies, and field-to-office workflows that support condition-driven decisions when paired with plant telemetry.
- +Preventive maintenance scheduling tied to detailed asset hierarchies
- +Work order workflows that keep maintenance history auditable
- +Reporting supports operational reviews of maintenance execution patterns
- +Field-facing processes reduce friction between dispatch and technicians
- –Renewable telemetry integrations depend on external data feeds and setup
- –Advanced predictive analytics require add-ons or complementary systems
- –Complex multi-site governance can take time to standardize
- –Some renewable-specific KPIs need custom configuration and report tuning
Enterprise maintenance leaders
Standardize renewable asset maintenance practices
Comparable maintenance execution records
Reliability engineers
Connect decisions to executed maintenance
Traceable maintenance decision records
Show 2 more scenarios
Operations maintenance teams
Track corrective repairs by asset
End-to-end corrective repair trail
Teams capture requests and assign work orders to specific renewable assets through completion with traceability.
Plant operations coordinators
Plan outage windows for maintenance
Improved outage maintenance visibility
Operations coordinators organize planned maintenance work orders around outages and defined operating windows.
Best for: Fits when maintenance teams need CMMS workflow control and traceable asset history across wind, solar, or storage fleets.
Power Factors Drive
enterpriseDrive manages renewable asset performance, operations, maintenance, and portfolio data.
KPI and condition views linked directly to maintenance planning workflows for asset performance tracking over time.
Power Factors Drive is renewable energy asset management software focused on generator performance, operational data handling, and O&M decision support.
- +Performance analytics are mapped to actionable maintenance workflows
- +Fleet-level benchmarking supports cross-asset comparison for loss attribution
- +Operational telemetry ingestion supports ongoing KPI trend tracking
- +Condition-oriented views aid defect identification without manual spreadsheet rebuilds
- –SCADA and historian integration depth depends on implementation details
- –Work order management is less extensive than full CMMS-grade tooling
- –Automation and provisioning capabilities are harder to validate from public documentation
- –RBAC and audit log granularity are not clearly articulated in materials
Wind development and engineering teams
Compare wake-aware yield scenarios
Comparable yield and loss estimates
Renewable portfolio managers and operations
Generate fleet operations reporting
Faster portfolio review cycles
Show 2 more scenarios
Renewable electrical engineers and inspectors
Standardize guided equipment inspections
Comparable inspection data for O&M
Inspectors record condition and performance attributes within an asset hierarchy for consistent reporting.
Solar control-room operations teams
Route deviations and incident follow-ups
Less repeated alarm noise
Teams log power deviations, adjust recurring alarm behavior, and assign follow-ups to responsible owners.
Best for: Fits when asset managers need KPI-driven O&M workflows and fleet benchmarking tied to operational telemetry rather than full CMMS replacement.
Solytic
SMBSolytic provides photovoltaic monitoring, anomaly detection, and portfolio performance management.
Analytics-to-maintenance linking that turns detected anomalies into prioritized investigation actions per asset.
Solytic is a renewable energy asset management system focused on turning operational telemetry into actionable maintenance and performance decisions. The product centers on time-series analytics for PV and wind assets, including monitoring, fault context, and performance reporting that can be used in O&M workflows.
- +Maintenance-oriented analytics that link fault patterns to investigation work
- +Fleet configuration to apply monitoring rules across multiple assets
- +Production and performance reporting built on time-series operational data
- +Clear operational views for asset-level health tracking
- –SCADA and historian integrations can require custom setup for each data source
- –Advanced predictive workflows depend on data completeness and tuning
- –Work order depth may be limited for teams that require full CMMS parity
- –RBAC and governance controls feel less granular than enterprise audit needs
Renewable O&M maintenance managers
Prioritize turbine and inverter fault tickets
Faster fault resolution
Asset performance analysts
Produce PV and wind performance reports
Improved performance tracking
Show 2 more scenarios
SCADA and data operations teams
Standardize fleet abnormality detection
More consistent investigations
Solytic supports fleet configuration and abnormality management so teams apply consistent thresholds and investigation paths.
Renewable asset managers
Track maintenance impact on KPIs
Better maintenance ROI
Solytic connects analytics outputs to O&M workflows so asset teams can assess how interventions affect KPIs.
Best for: Fits when renewables O&M teams need analytics-driven maintenance workflows across PV or wind fleets.
Sphera Asset Performance Management
enterpriseAsset performance management software with risk and reliability modules for energy sector infrastructure.
Governed configuration and audit-focused change management for performance logic used by multiple O and M teams.
Sphera Asset Performance Management models renewable energy asset performance from operational telemetry and maintenance signals into KPI views for asset and portfolio oversight. It focuses on condition and performance tracking that connect fleet operational data to maintenance planning workflows used by O and M teams.
- +Strong link between performance KPIs and maintenance planning workflows
- +Extensibility for custom calculations and portfolio-level reporting structures
- +Governance controls with audit-friendly change traceability for shared configuration
- +Integration support for operational telemetry and enterprise maintenance events
- –Configuration requires disciplined data mapping from multiple source systems
- –Less turnkey for wind and solar domain analytics without implementation work
- –Advanced rules and dashboards need ongoing admin tuning as assets scale
- –Time-series historian depth depends on external data ingestion design
Wind O and M teams
Translate turbine telemetry into maintenance KPIs
More timely maintenance interventions
Solar asset managers
Monitor inverter performance and degradation signals
Lower unplanned downtime
Show 2 more scenarios
Renewables portfolio analysts
Compare asset health across regions
Consistent cross-asset reporting
Uses configurable rules to roll up condition and performance into portfolio KPIs for oversight reviews.
Enterprise reliability governance
Enforce permissions and audit change history
Audit-ready governance for teams
Controls access and maintains change traceability so multiple teams operate from shared configurations.
Best for: Fits when asset management teams need governed KPI-to-maintenance workflows across mixed renewable fleets.
Bazefield
enterpriseBazefield centralizes renewable plant monitoring, operational analytics, and asset performance workflows.
Asset-linked work order execution with fleet reporting that tracks maintenance completion against production context.
Bazefield focuses on renewable asset workflows rather than spreadsheets, with a structure built around meter, production, and maintenance execution for wind and solar fleets. The tool supports operational monitoring, work order management, and asset health analytics that feed routine and condition-based maintenance planning.
- +Work order workflows link maintenance tasks to the specific asset record
- +Fleet reporting consolidates production and maintenance execution for oversight
- +Condition-driven maintenance inputs support targeted scheduling decisions
- +Asset hierarchy and metadata keep multi-site fleets navigable
- –Deep SCADA historian or energy management system integrations may require services
- –Predictive maintenance models are limited compared with specialist analytics stacks
Renewable maintenance execution teams
Link asset conditions to work orders
Traceable work outcomes by asset
Operations reporting and compliance
Standardize context for contract reports
More consistent reporting outputs
Show 2 more scenarios
Multi-site operations analysts
Correlate events with fleet asset history
Better troubleshooting and after-action review
Teams review operational events with supporting asset history across wind and solar sites.
Renewable data operations teams
Map telemetry signals to assets
Unified monitoring context across fleet
Signals are normalized into shared operational views so dashboards and planning stay consistent across sites.
Best for: Fits when multi-site renewable operators need controlled work orders and production reporting tied to asset records.
ONYX Insight FleetMONITOR
vertical specialistFleetMONITOR analyzes wind turbine condition and performance across operating fleets.
Inspection-to-asset-status workflow design that ties field findings to fleet reporting and follow-up tracking.
ONYX Insight FleetMONITOR centralizes fleet-level operational monitoring for renewable energy assets and surfaces performance and anomaly signals across sites. The system focuses on recurring inspections and field-ready workflows tied to asset health indicators, not just dashboards.
- +Fleet-wide monitoring views consolidate multi-site asset performance signals
- +Field workflow structure supports repeatable inspections tied to asset status
- +Benchmarking reports help compare sites using consistent operational context
- +Integration-oriented design supports connecting monitoring outputs to maintenance records
- –SCADA and historian integration depth can lag tools built for real-time telemetry
- –Automation breadth depends on how inspection and workflows are configured
Wind and solar asset managers
Track degradation signals across operating sites
Faster maintenance prioritization
Field operations and inspection teams
Run repeatable inspections with alerts
More consistent inspections
Show 2 more scenarios
Reliability engineers
Benchmark fleet performance and anomalies
Lower unplanned downtime
The system compares sites using benchmarking and structured reporting to locate outliers and recurring events.
Maintenance planners
Connect monitoring to work planning
Better work order alignment
Integration targets data movement between monitoring outputs and asset records for planning decisions.
Best for: Fits when fleet managers need repeatable inspection workflows and consistent cross-site performance reporting.
AlsoEnergy
vertical specialistAlsoEnergy provides renewable asset monitoring, performance analytics, and operational data management.
Issue-to-work traceability links operational events with maintenance follow-up across a fleet.
AlsoEnergy helps renewable operators manage asset performance and reliability workflows around solar and storage portfolios, with emphasis on operational data and execution tracking. The software focuses on turning plant telemetry and O&M inputs into consistent asset histories that support recurring maintenance planning and performance follow-up.
- +Connects monitoring signals to maintenance execution history
- +Fleet-level views support consistent cross-site asset comparisons
- +Workflow structure supports recurring reliability and follow-up cycles
- +Centralizes operational context for troubleshooting and reporting
- –Requires disciplined configuration to keep workflows consistent
- –Deep integration paths depend on established data sources
- –Less suitable for teams needing full CMMS breadth out of the box
- –Reporting customization can require analyst time
Solar O&M operations teams
Standardize inverter event handling
Faster corrective action cycles
Portfolio analytics teams
Track performance trends across sites
More reliable fleet comparisons
Show 2 more scenarios
Reliability engineers
Validate yield assumptions after changes
Better design assumption visibility
Engineers compare expected outcomes with monitored performance after design or operating updates.
Project delivery teams
Reuse configurations across deployments
More consistent commissioning transitions
Delivery teams standardize recurring site structures and configuration assumptions for handoffs into operations.
Best for: Fits when portfolio teams need auditable links from monitoring events to reliability actions.
Bentley AssetWise
enterpriseEnterprise asset performance management platform supporting renewable energy infrastructure lifecycle management.
AssetWise Data management centers on structured engineering asset records used across maintenance and inspection workflows.
Bentley AssetWise links engineering asset data, inspection findings, and work processes into a governed environment for operators with complex renewable portfolios. The distinguishing angle is its orientation around engineering data management and enterprise integration workflows rather than just maintenance scheduling.
- +Engineering data management for asset records across renewables portfolios
- +Strong integration support for connecting field inputs to enterprise workflows
- +Governance-oriented configuration for consistent maintenance and inspection traceability
- +Reusable asset information supports multi-site reporting and planning
- –More admin overhead than lighter CMMS tools for small fleets
- –Renewable-specific workflows may require configuration to match plant operations
- –Integration depth depends on available enterprise connectors and mapping work
- –User experience can feel engineering-centric for field-heavy teams
Asset management teams
Standardize records across wind and solar
Fewer record mismatches
O&M governance leads
Audit-ready traceability for field work
Cleaner audit trails
Show 2 more scenarios
Systems integration teams
Connect telemetry to operational records
Reduced manual rekeying
Uses integration workflows to map external operational data into asset records and downstream processes.
Portfolio reporting analysts
Drive analytics from unified asset data
More consistent metrics
Uses consistent asset structures to generate comparable availability and performance reporting across plants.
Best for: Fits when engineering teams need governed asset records feeding maintenance, inspections, and portfolio reporting.
Clir Renewables
API-firstClir Renewables applies operational data analytics to wind and solar performance improvement.
Asset-centric maintenance execution tracking that links planned activities to outcomes for portfolio reporting.
Clir Renewables is a renewable energy asset management system for managing utility-scale portfolios with a focus on operational reporting and O&M workflows. It centralizes asset and site information and ties it to maintenance planning so teams can track preventive work and follow through on field outcomes.
- +Maintenance planning tied to asset and site records for traceable execution
- +Centralized operational reporting reduces manual consolidation across sites
- +Integration support for operational and energy data feeds into monitoring
- +Governance controls with audit trails for changes and user actions
- –Workflow configuration can require specialist time for complex fleet setups
- –Limited out-of-the-box depth for advanced predictive analytics modeling
- –SCADA historian style workflows need external tooling for full coverage
- –Configuration flexibility may slow adoption when teams differ by region
Asset management analysts
Centralize site and equipment records
Cleaner asset recordkeeping
O&M maintenance planners
Track preventive work to completion
Higher preventive job completion
Show 2 more scenarios
Operations reporting teams
Report operational performance and outcomes
More reliable performance reporting
Users combine operational and energy data with maintenance history to support ongoing performance monitoring.
Governance and compliance leads
Audit changes and manage access
Stronger operational accountability
Administrators apply user access controls and audit logging to support governance across asset teams.
Best for: Fits when portfolio operators need asset-linked maintenance workflows and centralized reporting with controlled governance.
Conclusion
After evaluating 12 renewable energy asset management software, SkySpecs Horizon stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
Frequently Asked Questions About Renewable Energy Asset Management Software
How do renewable asset management platforms handle time-series historian data and plant telemetry ingestion?
Which tools connect monitoring outcomes to work order execution with traceability?
When teams need SCADA or energy management system integration, where does the data typically enter the asset data model?
What tradeoff appears when inspection and maintenance workflows matter more than deep telemetry computation?
How do data migration and asset hierarchy modeling affect rollout timelines for multi-site fleets?
What security controls and governance features should be checked for multi-team operations?
How do APIs and integration options typically support automation between monitoring, historian outputs, and maintenance systems?
When teams must manage preventive maintenance scheduling together with condition-based maintenance signals, which workflow patterns reduce duplication?
Which platform differences show up in extensibility when organizations need custom rules for performance logic or investigation routing?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
How to Choose the Right Renewable Energy Asset Management Software
We separate options by how far they can standardize your renewable energy asset data and then automate daily operations without manual spreadsheets. The biggest differences show up in integration depth, audit log coverage, automation triggers, and how well the data model stays consistent across assets and time.
Asset data model consistency
Why it matters
Asset data model consistency determines whether the same fields mean the same thing across wind and solar sites, so reporting stays trustworthy as you add assets. If this is weak, teams end up reconciling mismatched identifiers and units before they can act.
How to check
In a demo, import a sample dataset for two asset types and show how identifiers (site, asset, meter, contract) map to fields. Ask for a before/after export that proves units and field meanings stay consistent across re-imports and new assets.
API and automation triggers
Why it matters
API and automation triggers affect how quickly the system can react to operational events like data arrivals, curtailment events, and maintenance updates. If automation is shallow, your team will do more manual steps every day.
How to check
Request an example workflow: e.g., when new readings arrive, automatically generate a task or update an asset status. Then ask the vendor to show the API endpoints or automation settings used, plus how they behave under retries or delayed data.
Operational integration depth
Why it matters
Operational integration depth shows whether the product only displays data or actually connects the full workflow from ingestion to execution. Deeper integration reduces handoffs between tools and keeps one source of truth for asset status.
How to check
Ask what it can ingest and what it can write back: dashboards alone are not enough. In the demo, run a change end-to-end—import updated asset attributes, then show how the work side reflects it the same day.
RBAC and audit log coverage
Why it matters
RBAC and audit log coverage matter when multiple roles update asset records, work items, and configuration. Without strong audit trails, it’s hard to attribute changes and prevent accidental overwrites.
How to check
In admin screens, demonstrate at least two roles with different permissions and then attempt forbidden actions. Also show an audit log entry for a configuration change and for a data correction, including who did it and what changed.
Maintenance and work execution tracking
Why it matters
Maintenance and work execution tracking determines whether you can plan, record, and close activities tied to renewable assets. Good tracking reduces lost context between field work and asset performance history.
How to check
Use a sample maintenance scenario and show how it moves from planned to completed with attachments or notes tied to the right asset. Ask how the system links the activity to the underlying measurements or asset tags used elsewhere.
Red flags
- You can’t re-import a dataset without breaking field meanings or units
- Workflows require manual spreadsheet reconciliation for basic updates
- Audit history is missing for configuration changes or data corrections
Fit by situation
- If you operate mixed-site fleets and need consistent reporting across asset types, prioritize Asset data model consistency.
- If you want event-driven updates between tools, prioritize API and automation triggers.
- If multiple roles update assets and you must trace changes, prioritize RBAC and audit log coverage.
Funding and competing interests
This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.
They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.
Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →
- Review · 2026 · Environment EnergyRenewable Energy Software
- Review · 2026 · Business FinanceEquipment Asset Management Software
- Review · 2026 · Utilities PowerWater Utility Asset Management Software
- Review · 2026 · Real Estate PropertyReal Estate Asset Management Software
- Review · 2026 · Marketing AdvertisingSales Asset Management Software
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Environment Energy alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of environment energy tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare environment energy tools→