Commissioned Research
Top 10 Best Proxy Software of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE REVIEW

Cybersecurity Information Security

Top 10 Best Proxy Software of 2026

Review a shortlist of proxy software options with tradeoffs for web scraping, data access, and privacy. Editorial comparison helps teams choose.

19 min readUpdated Editorially scoped research
How we ranked these tools
01Editorial Scope

Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.

02Source Research

Agents extract product evidence with provenance, then collect written reviews and transcribe video reviews and podcasts.

Read our full methodology →

Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page. This does not influence our reviews. Editorial policy

Proxy software governs how scraping workloads acquire IP identity, rotate endpoints, and enforce access rules while keeping request throughput steady. This comparison helps analysts and operators weigh residential and datacenter network coverage against API extensibility, automation fit, and provisioning controls using examples such as Oxylabs.

Bright Data is the best proxy pick for automation-heavy scraping pipelines because its API-managed session routing keeps behavior consistent across long runs, whereas Rayobyte fits worker-based teams that need job-friendly rotation with authenticated proxy routing.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

Bright Data

API-managed session behavior lets scraping jobs keep routing rules consistent across long runs.

Best for: Fits when automation-heavy scraping pipelines need API-controlled routing and consistent proxy behavior.

2

Rayobyte

Editor pick

Job friendly rotation that aligns with worker segmentation and IP change cadence.

Best for: Fits when teams run worker-based scrapers that need rotating IPs and authenticated proxy routing.

3

IPRoyal

Editor pick

Session and connection governance geared toward long-running scrapers that must avoid abrupt endpoint failures.

Best for: Fits when scraping workloads need rotating IP access and predictable concurrency limits.

Comparison Table

1
Bright DataBest overall
enterprise
9.2/10
Overall
2
8.8/10
Overall
3
8.7/10
Overall
4
8.3/10
Overall
5
enterprise
8.1/10
Overall
6
API-first
7.7/10
Overall
7
7.5/10
Overall
8
7.0/10
Overall
9
6.8/10
Overall
10
enterprise
6.7/10
Overall
#1

Bright Data

enterprise

Large residential, datacenter, ISP, and mobile proxy network with a web scraping platform.

9.2/10
Overall
Features9.2/10
Ease of Use9.1/10
Value9.3/10
Standout feature

API-managed session behavior lets scraping jobs keep routing rules consistent across long runs.

Bright Data offers explicit proxy connectivity for HTTP traffic and SOCKS5 for client flexibility, which supports both browser-like scraping stacks and custom fetchers. API endpoints handle session behavior and request routing, which reduces reliance on hand-built rotation logic. Network selection can be configured at the request level so jobs can pin targets to specific geographies or IP categories.

A key tradeoff is that granular control and rotation require careful client-side concurrency and timeout tuning to avoid latency spikes during high-throughput runs. Bright Data fits teams running continuous scraping pipelines where the proxy layer must be controlled through configuration and automation rather than manual endpoint swaps.

Pros
  • +API-driven session routing reduces custom rotation glue code
  • +SOCKS5 and HTTP proxy endpoints cover common scraping client patterns
  • +Request-level configuration supports pinned geography and IP type selection
  • +Operational tooling helps track proxy performance across jobs
Cons
  • –High concurrency needs deliberate timeouts and connection pooling tuning
  • –Advanced routing policies require more configuration than endpoint-only proxies
  • –Client libraries may still need work for per-request session mapping
Use scenarios
  • web data engineering teams

    continuous market data scraping

    fewer IP mix failures

  • growth analytics teams

    site monitoring at scale

    more consistent collection rates

Show 2 more scenarios
  • fraud intelligence teams

    replicated browsing tests

    repeatable signal capture

    SOCKS5 access supports custom client stacks and network-level testing flows.

  • enterprise research teams

    location-specific content collection

    cleaner regional datasets

    Request-level selection supports geography and IP type targeting for datasets.

Best for: Fits when automation-heavy scraping pipelines need API-controlled routing and consistent proxy behavior.

#2

Rayobyte

SMB

Residential, datacenter, ISP, and mobile proxy provider formerly known as Blazing SEO.

8.8/10
Overall
Features8.8/10
Ease of Use8.9/10
Value8.7/10
Standout feature

Job friendly rotation that aligns with worker segmentation and IP change cadence.

Rayobyte is positioned for production scraping where IP rotation timing and session persistence affect detection risk and data consistency. The service is consumed through proxy connection settings that map cleanly to standard client libraries that already support authenticated proxies. Operationally, Rayobyte fits teams that need a repeatable way to configure scrapers without building a custom network layer.

A tradeoff appears when strict governance is required for large numbers of jobs, because per-session controls often live in the client integration rather than inside a rich admin workflow. Rayobyte works best when scraping jobs can be segmented into explicit workers that manage sticky sessions and concurrency, then rotate upstream IPs between runs.

Pros
  • +Rotating IP behavior supports distributed scraping patterns
  • +SOCKS5 and HTTP CONNECT style endpoints fit many scrapers
  • +Authentication supports per-client credential separation
  • +Good match for worker-based concurrency management
Cons
  • –Sticky session control can require client-side session design
  • –Governance depth for many job types may be limited
  • –Latency overhead can be noticeable under high concurrency
  • –Throughput limits may constrain large crawl bursts
Use scenarios
  • Data engineering teams

    Nightly entity enrichment from many sources

    More consistent dataset refreshes

  • Web scraping teams

    Form submission flows with session persistence

    Lower session breakage rates

Show 2 more scenarios
  • QA and monitoring

    Synthetic checks against geo restricted pages

    Earlier detection of blocks

    Authenticated proxy routing helps reproduce access patterns for monitoring scripts.

  • Competitive intelligence analysts

    Repeated page fetches without hard IP pinning

    More reliable scrape completions

    Rotation schedules help distribute requests across runs for less repeat exposure.

Best for: Fits when teams run worker-based scrapers that need rotating IPs and authenticated proxy routing.

#3

IPRoyal

SMB

Residential, datacenter, ISP, and mobile proxies with pay-as-you-go options.

8.7/10
Overall
Features8.7/10
Ease of Use8.6/10
Value8.8/10
Standout feature

Session and connection governance geared toward long-running scrapers that must avoid abrupt endpoint failures.

IPRoyal is a proxy software provider focused on routing web requests through rotating IPs for scraping and data tasks. Its control surface centers on managing proxy access and session behavior so scrapers can keep request patterns stable across runs.

Teams can integrate via standard proxy credentials and network settings used by scraping stacks that support SOCKS5 or HTTP proxy endpoints. Operational controls focus on concurrency handling and connection limits to reduce timeouts during high-volume collection.

Pros
  • +Credential-based proxy authentication supports straightforward integration
  • +Rotating IP support fits scraping tasks that need changing source signals
  • +Connection limit controls reduce burst-induced failures during collection
  • +Endpoint-based configuration works with common scraping frameworks
Cons
  • –Session consistency tuning can be manual when traffic must stay sticky
  • –Advanced routing features require careful validation to prevent data gaps
Use scenarios
  • Developers and network engineers

    Route application traffic via proxy layer

    Centralized control over egress

  • Data engineers and scraping teams

    Collect with rotating proxy pools

    More varied source IP access

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Automation developers

    Keep stable proxy identity

    Fewer session disruptions

    Session-affinity settings maintain the same proxy identity across related requests in multi-step scraping workflows.

  • QA and application testing teams

    Test reputation-sensitive browsing flows

    Broader browsing coverage

    Teams switch proxy types and IP pools to test routed browsing flows from multiple network vantage points.

Best for: Fits when scraping workloads need rotating IP access and predictable concurrency limits.

#4

Webshare

SMB

Datacenter, residential, and static proxy network with a free tier.

8.3/10
Overall
Features8.3/10
Ease of Use8.3/10
Value8.3/10
Standout feature

Session-aware connection handling for automation workflows that need stable request state across multiple steps.

Webshare provides managed proxy access for scraping and data collection through a centralized dashboard and machine-friendly endpoints. It supports rotating IP usage and session handling so automation jobs can keep consistent state across multiple requests.

Pros
  • +Rotating IP support helps reduce repeated-request correlation
  • +Dashboard controls for per-target proxy configuration
  • +Credentialed proxy access fits multi-job automation
  • +Operational logs support debugging failed crawl requests
Cons
  • –Advanced routing like proxy chaining needs careful setup discipline
  • –Throughput tuning can require iterative configuration changes
  • –Geolocation control may be limited to available pool coverage
  • –Higher session demands increase coordination complexity
Use scenarios
  • Operations teams and researchers

    Run repeatable authenticated browsing

    Repeatable proxy access

  • Site reliability and monitoring teams

    Check availability from changing IPs

    More external perspectives

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Developers and automation engineers

    Send web and API requests via proxy

    Proxy-enabled application traffic

    Code selects authenticated proxy endpoints so automated request traffic runs without managing proxy servers.

  • QA, web, and application teams

    Test IP-location-dependent behavior

    Higher location coverage

    Proxy-enabled requests validate web and API behavior across different IP locations and network types.

Best for: Fits when data teams need credentialed rotating proxy access with operational controls for automated scraping jobs.

#5

Oxylabs

enterprise

Residential, datacenter, ISP, and mobile proxy infrastructure with an AI-powered scraper API.

8.1/10
Overall
Features8.1/10
Ease of Use8.0/10
Value8.2/10
Standout feature

API-led proxy provisioning with job-oriented configuration supports repeatable automation across environments.

Oxylabs is a fit for data engineering and intelligence workflows that run continuously and require repeatable proxy configuration. The integration surface is centered on APIs for provisioning access and driving scraping components through code and schedulers. Operational workflows typically include rotating IP behavior, concurrency control, and rules that help manage session consistency across requests. This structure supports automation that avoids manual proxy credential handling across environments.

Pros
  • +API-driven provisioning supports scripted proxy configuration changes
  • +Multiple routing patterns help match target-site session requirements
  • +Operational tooling supports monitoring and failure triage during jobs
  • +Request handling controls reduce wasted retries on unstable endpoints
Cons
  • –Concurrency and rotation tuning require deliberate configuration discipline
  • –Complex workflow setups can take longer than simple fixed-proxy use
  • –Higher-volume orchestration needs tight integration with scraper logic
  • –Some edge cases require deeper support involvement to stabilize
Use scenarios
  • Revenue intelligence teams

    Monitor competitor pages at scale

    Fewer blocks during frequent checks

  • Data engineering teams

    ETL ingestion from many domains

    More stable ingestion schedules

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Cyber threat research teams

    Collect indicators from variable sources

    Higher fetch success rates

    Maintains session behavior while rotating routes to reduce repeated denials.

  • QA automation engineers

    Test scraping flows against geo targets

    More consistent test outcomes

    Drives scripted traffic patterns through code-run configurations for repeatable test runs.

Best for: Fits when data teams need API automation and strong job-level controls for large scraping workloads.

#6

Apify Proxy

API-first

Proxy rotation service integrated into the Apify web scraping and automation platform.

7.7/10
Overall
Features7.7/10
Ease of Use7.7/10
Value7.7/10
Standout feature

Per-run proxy configuration inside Apify Actors, so automation and routing are controlled together.

Apify Proxy is the proxy offering inside Apify’s automation ecosystem, where browser and HTTP scraping tasks can route traffic through managed proxy endpoints.

Pros
  • +Actor-level routing lets each automation run pick proxy behavior
  • +Programmatic controls fit scripted scraping pipelines and batch jobs
  • +Good fit for teams already operating inside Apify’s job model
  • +Managed endpoints reduce custom proxy infrastructure work
Cons
  • –Less suitable as a drop-in proxy layer for non-Apify stacks
  • –Governance for many internal services may require extra orchestration
  • –Rotation controls can feel constrained for highly specialized traffic rules
  • –Advanced proxy chaining and traffic shaping are not the primary focus
Use scenarios
  • Browser and HTTP automation teams

    Attach managed proxies to jobs

    Proxies set per job run

  • Data extraction teams

    Route scraping with rotation patterns

    Coordinated proxy rotation

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Organizations using Apify Actors

    Select proxy settings in task config

    Less proxy integration work

    Apify-runntime configuration selects proxy settings without building a separate proxy orchestration layer.

  • Workflow automation builders

    Use proxies across multi-step runs

    Consistent routed traffic

    Jobs reuse proxy settings within Apify workflow executions for consistent routing across steps.

Best for: Fits when Apify-centric scraping workflows need consistent proxy routing per job.

#7

Nimble

SMB

Residential proxy and web scraping API platform with an AI-powered unblocker.

7.5/10
Overall
Features7.5/10
Ease of Use7.5/10
Value7.5/10
Standout feature

Session affinity controls for maintaining client consistency across a multi-request scraping workflow.

Nimble from nimbleway.com is a proxy service geared toward web scraping and data collection workflows that need both IP variety and session handling. The product supports rotating IP access patterns and includes mechanisms for session affinity so browser-like traffic can stay stable across requests.

Pros
  • +Session affinity options help keep multi-page workflows stable
  • +Rotating IP access supports distribution across scraping targets
  • +Authentication and request constraints reduce accidental misrouting
  • +Configurable request routing supports tighter latency control
Cons
  • –API and automation details are less complete than larger leaders
  • –Session affinity tuning takes more setup than simple stateless scraping
  • –Rotation behavior can add debugging complexity for failures
  • –Advanced governance features require careful operational discipline
Use scenarios
  • Scraping and data platform engineers

    Route jobs through rotating residential IPs

    Controlled outbound collection

  • Platform and infrastructure teams

    Replace parts of a crawler stack

    Less crawler infrastructure

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Market intelligence and operations teams

    Run scheduled monitoring across URLs

    Recurring web observations

    Repeatable collection jobs monitor many URLs over time with proxy-backed routing.

  • Data and engineering teams

    Retrieve pages for reporting and enrichment

    Usable content for systems

    Recurring page retrieval uses proxy-backed requests to support downstream reporting and enrichment workflows.

Best for: Fits when teams run recurring scraping jobs that need session continuity and rotating IP capacity.

#8

Infatica

SMB

Residential, datacenter, ISP, and mobile proxy network with a scraping API.

7.0/10
Overall
Features7.0/10
Ease of Use7.0/10
Value7.0/10
Standout feature

API-based provisioning and job-scoped proxy configuration for repeatable scraping runs.

Informatica provides managed proxy access for web scraping and data collection workloads, with routing options geared toward industrial automation. Its core offering centers on authenticated proxy endpoints that support rotating behavior and session handling for HTTP clients.

Pros
  • +API-driven proxy provisioning reduces manual endpoint setup for scraping jobs
  • +Session-aware routing helps keep logins stable during longer fetch runs
  • +Operational visibility supports diagnosing proxy failures by job and time window
  • +Configuration supports both per-task and reusable proxy endpoint patterns
Cons
  • –Fine-grained connection governance can require careful integration work
  • –Advanced traffic shaping features may not cover all custom client behaviors
Use scenarios
  • Developers and platform engineers

    Use authenticated proxy egress for scripts

    Standardized outbound routing

  • Security teams and researchers

    Run controlled reconnaissance with varied IPs

    More flexible observations

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Web data engineers and scraping teams

    Crawl and scrape with proxy-backed crawlers

    Recurring web data stream

    Proxy-backed scripts and crawlers collect structured or semi-structured website information for downstream systems.

  • Infrastructure and operations teams

    Standardize service egress routing

    Repeatable routing

    Account-based proxy access applies repeatable proxy routing so services need fewer ad hoc client changes.

Best for: Fits when teams need automated proxy provisioning and session stability for recurring scraping pipelines.

#9

Proxyrack

SMB

Residential, datacenter, ISP, and mobile proxy network with unmetered plans.

6.8/10
Overall
Features6.8/10
Ease of Use6.8/10
Value6.8/10
Standout feature

Sticky session support paired with rotating IP pool behavior for longer scrape sessions without full re-login cycles.

Proxyrack is a proxy software provider focused on web scraping and data collection workflows that need controlled proxy routing. The service centers on rotating IP pool delivery for automated fetch jobs and supports session behavior via sticky session options.

Pros
  • +Rotating IP pool options for scripted scraping at scale
  • +Sticky session support helps maintain session affinity during fetch bursts
  • +Username and password authentication for controlled client access
  • +Connection limit controls reduce risk of runaway crawlers
Cons
  • –Limited visibility into per-request routing outcomes compared with larger suites
  • –More work than fully managed scraping stacks for browser-heavy flows
  • –Operational discipline is required to keep IP access controls aligned
  • –Automation depth depends on correct client-side retry and session handling
Use scenarios
  • QA engineers and browser automation developers

    Route Selenium through authenticated proxies

    Repeatable browser sessions

  • Developers and platform engineering teams

    Distribute concurrent HTTP workloads

    Distributed request origins

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Data engineering and web scraping teams

    Run recurring collection with stable sessions

    Controlled request origins

    Recurring data collection uses rotating or session-stable proxy routes to control request origins over long runs.

  • Market research and competitive intelligence teams

    Collect content from selected regions

    Location-specific views

    Teams inspect web content using proxies selected for specific countries or regions.

Best for: Fits when teams need script-driven proxy rotation plus session control for data collection jobs.

#10

SOAX

enterprise

Residential and mobile proxy network with granular geo-targeting controls.

6.7/10
Overall
Features6.7/10
Ease of Use6.7/10
Value6.7/10
Standout feature

Programmatic proxy provisioning via SOAX API tied to job orchestration for repeatable session configuration.

SOAX is a proxy software provider focused on web scraping and data collection workflows that need large pools of rotating IPs. It supports HTTP and SOCKS5 proxy access with authentication and exposes programmatic control through an API for provisioning and session settings.

Pros
  • +API-driven provisioning for proxy sessions across scheduled jobs
  • +HTTP and SOCKS5 proxy interfaces with username password authentication
  • +Multi-region targeting supports geography-specific scraping tasks
  • +Rotating IP pools fit workflows that need churn over time
Cons
  • –Operational complexity rises when managing session strategy and rotation timing
  • –Troubleshooting can require deeper proxy metrics and logs than expected
  • –Consistency controls need careful tuning for sticky session style workloads
  • –Throughput limits depend on request patterns and connection reuse behavior
Use scenarios
  • Data engineering and scraping operations teams

    Assign proxies across automated workers

    Scalable proxy-based collection

  • Developers and automation engineers

    Rotate outbound IP exits for requests

    Managed outbound IP rotation

Show 2 more scenarios
  • QA, fraud, and trust teams

    Verify accounts and workflows by location

    Geo-specific verification results

    Batch checks use controlled proxy locations to produce geo-specific verification outcomes.

  • SEO and competitive intelligence teams

    Monitor search from specific cities

    Location-specific search observations

    Search result monitoring gathers observations from selected cities, countries, or network locations using targeted proxies.

Best for: Fits when teams want API-linked proxy provisioning and multi-region rotation for scraping jobs.

Conclusion

After evaluating 10 proxy software, Bright Data stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
Bright Data

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

Frequently Asked Questions About Proxy Software

How do Oxylabs and Bright Data differ in API-first integration for scraping pipelines?
Oxylabs provides API-led proxy provisioning with job-oriented configuration so environments can reproduce the same proxy behavior across repeated runs. Bright Data focuses on API-managed session behavior, so scraping jobs keep routing rules consistent over long runs even as rotation strategies change.
How does Apify Proxy connect proxy settings to Actors without building separate proxy orchestration?
Apify Proxy pairs with Apify Actors so each run selects proxy settings inside the actor runtime task configuration. This reduces glue code when concurrency and proxy rotation need to follow the same execution model as the actor workflow.
Which tool is better for worker-based rotation that aligns with IP change cadence per scraper worker?
Rayobyte fits teams that segment work across workers and want rotating IP behavior tied to that segmentation. Its standout job-friendly rotation aligns with worker boundaries so per-worker sessions can change IPs on demand without rewriting the core worker logic.
Which platform provides session and connection governance aimed at avoiding abrupt endpoint failures during long scrapers?
IPRoyal emphasizes session and connection governance for long-running scrapers that must avoid sudden endpoint breakage. Its concurrency handling and connection limits are tuned to reduce timeouts during high-volume collection.
When do sticky-session style controls matter more than pure IP rotation in Proxyrack and Webshare workflows?
Proxyrack supports sticky session options alongside rotating IP pool behavior, which helps when multi-request flows require consistent identity handling across steps. Webshare also supports session-aware connection handling, but Proxyrack’s sticky pairing is a closer match for workflows that need longer scrape sessions without full re-login cycles.
What breaks if a scraping stack cannot enforce session affinity while using Nimble or SOAX?
Nimble relies on session affinity controls to keep client consistency across multi-request workflows, so losing affinity can increase bot-detection risk for flows that expect continuity. SOAX can still rotate across regions via its API, but without affinity-aware client logic the session behavior settings can fail to stabilize request patterns.
How do SOAX and Informatica handle job-scoped proxy configuration for repeated pipelines?
SOAX exposes programmatic control through its API so proxy provisioning and session settings can attach to job scheduling. Informatica focuses on API-based provisioning with job-scoped proxy configuration so repeated scraping pipelines can reuse a consistent setup per run.
How do Rayobyte and Webshare support operational troubleshooting for automated crawls?
Webshare targets operational workflows by adding usage controls and logs that support troubleshooting during crawls. Rayobyte emphasizes rotating IP pool access with authenticated proxy endpoints, so troubleshooting typically centers on verifying per-request routing and worker segmentation rather than dashboard-based crawl diagnostics.
Where does Rayobyte tend to fall short compared with Oxylabs for high-volume automation that needs repeatable API provisioning?
Rayobyte aligns best with worker-based rotation and authenticated proxy routing, which can require more client-side configuration to standardize behavior across environments. Oxylabs provides API-led proxy provisioning and job-oriented configuration that better supports repeatable automation for large scraping workloads.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

How to Choose the Right Proxy Software

Options differ most in how they route and manage client traffic—especially around endpoint coverage and access controls. Look closely at routing rules, authentication method, and audit log visibility to predict how the proxy will behave under real browsing and API workloads.

Routing rules and destination filtering

Why it matters

Routing rules and destination filtering decide what traffic the proxy allows, blocks, or forwards, and they control how predictably the system behaves across domains. This matters when you need consistent policy enforcement for both web browsing and API calls.

How to check

In a demo, create two allow/deny rules (one for a test domain, one for a test path) and watch whether requests match the intended outcome. Ask how the product handles rule conflicts (order, specificity, or precedence) and verify with a short test set.

User access controls and authentication

Why it matters

User access controls and authentication determine who can use the proxy and how you prove it later. If you need separation of duties, weak or opaque access control can undermine day-to-day governance.

How to check

Check the interface for user/group or role assignment and whether access can be revoked immediately. During the demo, try access with two different users and confirm the logs and request outcomes change as expected.

Audit logs with request visibility

Why it matters

Audit logs with request visibility help you investigate misuse and demonstrate what happened without guessing. For proxy software, the details of what gets recorded (who, where, and what) directly affect operational confidence.

How to check

Perform a small set of actions in the proxy and then open the audit or access log view to confirm fields like user identity, timestamp, destination, and action result. Ask whether logs can be exported and whether retention is configurable.

IP behavior and rotation options

Why it matters

IP behavior and rotation options affect how stable sessions are and how reliably outbound identity stays consistent for a job. If your workflows expect consistent behavior, overly aggressive rotation can break repeatability.

How to check

Run repeated requests to the same test endpoint and observe whether the outbound IP identity stays consistent. Ask for the exact controls available (whether rotation is optional, how it’s configured, and how quickly changes apply).

Client configuration support

Why it matters

Client configuration support affects adoption because different apps and workflows consume proxy settings differently. If configuration is limited, you may need workarounds that complicate policy enforcement.

How to check

Try configuring a test browser and a simple HTTP client to use the proxy settings you’re shown, then confirm both routes correctly. Ask which standard ways of pointing clients at the proxy are supported and verify them live.

Red flags

  • Routing rules that are vague about precedence or conflict handling
  • Audit logs that omit user identity or destination details
  • IP behavior that cannot be made consistent when workflows require repeatability

Fit by situation

  • If you need consistent policy enforcement across many domains, prioritize routing rules and destination filtering.
  • If you share proxy access across teams, prioritize user access controls and authentication.
  • If you expect investigations and proof after incidents, prioritize audit logs with request visibility.
Commissioned Research

Funding and competing interests

This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.

They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.

Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.