GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Technology Digital MediaTop 10 Best Pod Software of 2026
Top 10 best pod software options ranked by features and costs, with side-by-side notes for podcasters choosing tools like Castos, Spreaker, Captivate.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Castos is the best pick for teams that want reliable hosted podcast distribution tied to a WordPress publishing workflow, whereas Acast fits production groups who need monetization and ad reporting managed in the same admin workflow.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Castos
WordPress integration ties episode publishing to hosted audio management and RSS feed updates.
Built for fits when teams need reliable hosted podcast distribution with a WordPress publishing workflow..
Spreaker
Editor pickWeb studio workflow that keeps recording, multitrack assembly, and publishing steps connected.
Built for fits when teams need browser-based recording and editing with RSS-driven publishing management..
Captivate
Editor pickAutomated show note and chapter generation with editable episode page templates inside the same publishing workflow.
Built for fits when teams need hosting plus branded episode pages and episode-level tracking..
Related reading
Comparison Table
Podcast software choices hinge on how recordings get captured, tracks get processed, and episodes get distributed with audit-friendly workflows. This ranked list targets analysts and operators who need concrete comparisons of hosting, remote recording, and publishing automation, with placement driven by integration depth, data handling, and operational controls rather than marketing claims.
Castos
SMBPodcast hosting with WordPress integration via Seriously Simple Podcasting.
WordPress integration ties episode publishing to hosted audio management and RSS feed updates.
Castos is built around hosted podcast delivery, with a show dashboard for episode publishing, media management, and RSS feed generation. The platform fits teams that want a dependable publishing loop without building their own hosting stack, especially when WordPress production is already in place. Admin controls are geared toward managing shows and contributors through account-level access patterns rather than newsroom-grade governance tooling. Platform extensibility comes from integrations that connect site publishing workflows to hosted audio delivery.
A tradeoff appears in post-production depth because Castos does not position itself as a full multitrack editor or mastering studio. Teams that need non-destructive multitrack sessions, LUFS workflows, and mastering-grade loudness tooling often add an external editor. Castos fits organizations that primarily need fast episode publishing, RSS-based syndication, and consistent hosting for multiple shows.
- +WordPress-centered publishing workflow connects site posts to episodes
- +RSS feed generation and directory distribution support standard syndication
- +Media management keeps show assets organized and reusable
- +Hosted playback reduces the need to operate streaming infrastructure
- –Limited built-in multitrack editing and mastering workflows
- –Advanced workflow automation needs external tooling for deeper steps
- –Contributor governance is account and show oriented rather than role granular
- –Remote recording production still requires external recording setup
WordPress publishing teams
Publish episodes from site drafts
Faster publish to directories
Small media operations
Run consistent multi-show hosting
Less operational overhead
Show 2 more scenarios
Marketing teams
Launch campaign podcasts on schedule
Timely audience reach
RSS feed delivery supports predictable distribution across podcast apps.
Agency podcast producers
Manage multiple client shows
Cleaner production handoffs
Hosted media and episode management reduce client-side hosting complexity.
Best for: Fits when teams need reliable hosted podcast distribution with a WordPress publishing workflow.
More related reading
Spreaker
SMBPodcast hosting with live broadcasting and monetization tools.
Web studio workflow that keeps recording, multitrack assembly, and publishing steps connected.
Spreaker targets creators who want to run the full episode lifecycle from recording through publishing without moving projects across many tools. The built-in studio workflow supports recording from within the site and an editor experience geared toward assembling episodes as multitrack sessions. Loudness-related processing and episode metadata workflows help standardize releases and reduce manual steps before distribution.
A key tradeoff is that Spreaker’s editorial depth is shaped around its own studio and publishing workflows, which can feel limiting for teams that rely on external DAWs and complex post-production chains. Spreaker fits best when a small team needs repeatable production, quick episode turnaround, and one place to manage show assets and release distribution.
- +Browser studio supports recording and episode assembly in one workflow
- +Built-in multitrack editing reduces round-trips to external editors
- +RSS-based publishing and episode metadata workflow are designed for repeat releases
- +Publishing assets for shows and episodes simplify ongoing release management
- –Advanced mastering workflows may require exporting to a dedicated DAW
- –Automation and API coverage is limited compared with enterprise publishing stacks
- –External double-ender and remote pipelines are less configurable than DAW-first setups
- –Governance controls are oriented around workspace roles rather than detailed RBAC
Independent creators
Frequent episodes with minimal tool switching
Faster episode turnaround
Small podcast teams
Multitrack sessions managed in-browser
More consistent releases
Show 1 more scenario
Audio publishers
Ongoing show catalog distribution
Simplified syndication operations
RSS-based syndication and show asset management support repeated directory distribution.
Best for: Fits when teams need browser-based recording and editing with RSS-driven publishing management.
Captivate
SMBPodcast hosting with marketing tools and growth analytics.
Automated show note and chapter generation with editable episode page templates inside the same publishing workflow.
Captivate provides podcast hosting and publishing management with RSS feed based updates, so episode metadata changes and player embeds live in one place. Episode pages can be customized to support show branding, and analytics provide visibility into downloads and listener engagement at the episode level. The admin workflow also includes automation hooks for content augmentation like show notes and chapters so routine edits are less repetitive.
A practical tradeoff is that teams that want a highly custom player experience or advanced post-production editing must pair Captivate with external audio editors. Captivate fits best when remote publishing is the priority, where producers need consistent page formatting, repeatable episode templates, and tracking across directories and embeds.
- +Integrated show pages and player embeds reduce reliance on external sites
- +Episode publishing and updates flow through RSS-driven metadata management
- +Automation support for show notes and chapters cuts repeat production work
- +Analytics tie performance to episodes for faster iteration on formats
- –Advanced audio mastering and deep editing still require external DAWs
- –Highly customized player behavior may depend on theme or embed constraints
- –Transcription and diarization quality can require manual review for edge cases
Marketing teams
Launch consistent branded show pages
Faster campaigns, fewer web handoffs
Producer teams
Weekly remote production workflow
Lower editing time per episode
Show 1 more scenario
Growth analysts
Iterate formats based on episode metrics
More targeted content decisions
Review episode-level performance signals to identify which topics and lengths drive better retention.
Best for: Fits when teams need hosting plus branded episode pages and episode-level tracking.
Buzzsprout
SMBPodcast hosting platform with episode distribution to major directories.
Integrated loudness normalization tied to export, keeping episode levels consistent without external mastering steps.
Buzzsprout pairs podcast hosting with production utilities like an audio editor, waveform playback, and loudness-focused export settings. Show publishing centers on RSS distribution and directory-ready metadata such as chapters and ID3 tagging.
Content management emphasizes episode organization, bulk actions, and clear export and replacement flows for updated audio. The admin experience focuses on controlling where feeds publish and which assets map to each episode.
- +Waveform editor supports trimming and reordering within the browser
- +Loudness normalization targets consistent integrated levels for exports
- +Chapter and metadata workflows reduce manual formatting errors
- +RSS publishing stays tightly coupled to episode asset management
- –Advanced editing workflows depend on limited multitrack support
- –API surface lacks clear coverage for detailed episode asset automation
- –Remote recording workflows are not the primary focus of the tool
- –Search and reporting depth is lighter than analytics-first host designs
Best for: Fits when a small team needs hosting plus in-browser editing and consistent loudness exports without building custom tooling.
Podbean
SMBPodcast hosting and monetization platform with live streaming support.
Built-in episode publishing workflow that ties hosted media, RSS updates, and directory distribution to each upload lifecycle.
Podbean runs podcast hosting and publishing with a unified workflow for distributing shows to major directories via RSS. Podbean includes episode management, show page creation, and in-browser player support for web publishing.
It also supports content syndication through podcast feeds, plus audience and download reporting tied to show activity. Editing and studio-grade mastering are not Podbean’s focus, so recording and audio cleanup typically depend on external editing tools.
- +Podcast hosting and distribution are managed from one episode workflow
- +RSS-based syndication supports consistent directory publishing patterns
- +Show pages and players are generated directly from hosted content
- +Audience reporting maps to episode publishing activity
- –Audio mastering and loudness workflows depend on external tools
- –Advanced editorial automation is limited compared with specialist production suites
- –Multitrack session editing is not a native recording workflow focus
- –Governance for multi-user show operations is less granular than enterprise CMS
Best for: Fits when a team needs reliable podcast hosting, RSS publishing, and episode operations without building a custom publishing stack.
Transistor
SMBPodcast hosting with unlimited shows and private podcasting support.
Built-in transcription with chapter generation directly on episode publishing pages.
Transistor is a podcast hosting and publishing system aimed at teams that need fast episode workflows with built-in publishing controls. It supports an RSS-based distribution model plus editorial tools for show pages, episode pages, and metadata such as titles, descriptions, and artwork.
Transistor also includes transcription and chapter tooling for episode pages, along with analytics for downloads and listener behavior. The product is geared toward managing production output and audience distribution in one place rather than stitching separate recording and hosting systems.
- +Episode workflow stays in one UI from drafts to publishing
- +Transcription and chapter generation reduce manual show notes work
- +Download analytics include attribution-style breakdowns for episodes
- +RSS publishing works cleanly for podcast directory distribution
- –Advanced production editing features remain limited versus full DAW pipelines
- –Team governance controls like RBAC and audit logs are not as deep
- –Automation for episode metadata updates is constrained for large catalogs
- –Double-ender remote recording workflows require outside tooling
Best for: Fits when teams want hosted publishing with episode-level transcription and chapters.
Acast
enterprisePodcast hosting and monetization platform with programmatic advertising.
Built-in ad and performance reporting that stays linked to each published episode across show activity.
Acast pairs podcast hosting with ad-focused publishing and audience reporting, which differentiates it from recording-first tools. Shows are managed through a web admin that handles feed-based distribution, episode publishing, and content updates without requiring third-party tooling.
Media delivery is built around podcast RSS workflows, including episode metadata management and directory distribution. Advertising and performance analytics are integrated into the publishing lifecycle rather than handled solely through an external dashboard.
- +Integrated advertising workflow tied to episode publishing
- +Detailed audience reporting linked to show activity
- +Stable RSS-driven distribution with managed episode metadata
- +Web-based admin reduces reliance on custom publishing scripts
- –Editing and mastering tools are limited compared with DAW-style workflows
- –Automation options depend heavily on the Acast API and setup
- –Remote or multitrack recording features are not the core focus
- –Granular role governance and audit workflows are less explicit than enterprise editors
Best for: Fits when production teams want hosted publishing and ad reporting under one admin workflow.
Zencastr
SMBBrowser-based remote podcast recording with local track separation.
Browser-based waveform editing directly on per-speaker tracks within the same recording session workspace.
Zencastr is a remote podcast recording tool focused on producing clean multitrack takes for each participant. Its workflow centers on double-ender style capture that keeps audio separate per speaker and reduces mixing work later.
Zencastr also includes built-in editing in the browser so post production can start before exporting. Centralized show delivery and publishing-oriented outputs are handled from the same workspace that manages recordings.
- +Separate tracks per participant with consistent session handoff
- +Browser waveform editor supports quick edits without external tooling
- +Automatic transcription and diarization reduce manual show prep time
- +Admin workspace manages multiple shows and recording sessions
- –Audio quality depends on participant local capture and stability
- –Editing features stay lighter than dedicated DAWs for complex fixes
- –Workflow needs careful client audio setup to avoid re-records
- –Automation and exports can require an extra step for distribution
Best for: Fits when distributed teams need reliable double-ender multitrack capture and quick browser edits.
Hindenburg Pro
vertical specialistProfessional audio editor designed for journalists and podcasters.
Hindenburg Pro’s nondestructive multitrack workflow keeps processing adjustable during mastering passes without destroying waveform edits.
Hindenburg Pro centers on a multitrack session editor with waveform editing and processing stages that remain adjustable until export.
The loudness monitoring and mastering-oriented export checks are designed to keep episodes aligned to a target loudness profile.
Integrated noise reduction tools support cleanup inside the same editing workflow instead of requiring a separate audio chain.
Remote recording workflows rely on its companion approach, so session management stays inside the app but stays lighter than full studio systems.
- +Waveform editor supports nondestructive, production-style edits
- +Loudness monitoring and export targets help keep episodes consistent
- +Multitrack session workflow fits double-ender and remote takes
- +Noise reduction tools are integrated into the editing pipeline
- –Advanced podcast automation needs external tooling
- –Project handoff to other editors can require manual relinking
- –Remote workflow is less granular than full double-ender studios
- –Automation around transcripts and chapters is limited without extra steps
Best for: Fits when producers need nondestructive multitrack editing with loudness control and a streamlined remote workflow.
Alitu
SMBAutomated podcast production tool from recording to published episode.
Guided audio cleanup and editing that turns uploaded recordings into a ready-to-publish episode with minimal manual mastering.
Alitu is an end-to-end podcast production and publishing workspace that combines audio cleanup, editing, and distribution in one guided flow. It is built around upload-and-process workflows that generate a finished episode from source audio with less manual editing time.
Alitu also handles show assembly tasks like episode metadata management and RSS output for podcast directory distribution. The tool’s focus stays on repeatable episode production for small teams rather than deep multitrack recording and custom DAW-style session control.
- +Guided episode workflow reduces manual mastering steps for every release
- +Audio cleanup tools target common voice issues during import
- +RSS feed generation supports standard podcast directory publishing
- +Metadata and episode assembly stay centralized in one production flow
- –Limited control for complex multitrack sessions and routing needs
- –Automation choices can be harder to fine-tune than DAW-based editing
- –Fewer governance controls than larger-team hosting and admin tooling
- –Transcription, if used, may require review for diarization accuracy
Best for: Fits when one-person shows or small teams need fast, repeatable episode production with basic publishing automation.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 technology digital media, Castos stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right pod software
This guide covers the tradeoffs between podcast hosting, in-browser production, and editor-first multitrack workflows across Castos, Spreaker, Captivate, Buzzsprout, Podbean, Transistor, Acast, Zencastr, Hindenburg Pro, and Alitu.
It explains how to pick a tool based on distribution workflows, recording-to-editing depth, loudness and metadata handling, automation, and governance controls that matter for ongoing shows.
Podcast software that ties recording, editing, and publishing into repeatable episode workflows
Pod software supports recording and post-production tasks like multitrack editing and loudness-controlled export, plus publishing tasks like RSS feed delivery and podcast directory distribution.
Many tools also attach show administration to episode assembly so recurring releases are faster and metadata stays consistent. Castos and Buzzsprout emphasize hosted publishing and syndication through RSS feed updates, while Zencastr and Hindenburg Pro emphasize browser or desktop multitrack production control for remote recording and editing.
How pod software tools differ in production depth and publishing control
Feature fit depends on whether the workflow is built around hosted distribution, browser-based studio editing, or multitrack editing with nondestructive processing.
Tools also differ in how much automation touches show notes, chapters, transcription, and metadata updates, plus how well governance scales beyond a single show owner.
WordPress-connected episode publishing with RSS-fed distribution
Castos ties episode publishing to a WordPress-centered workflow that keeps hosted audio management and RSS feed updates in sync. This fits teams that want editorial work to live on a website and episode assets to follow through syndication without extra stitching.
Browser studio that combines multitrack assembly and publishing
Spreaker keeps recording, multitrack editing, and episode publishing connected in a browser workflow. This reduces round-trips to external editors when teams want to assemble episodes and manage directory-ready metadata in one place.
Automated show notes, chapters, and editable episode page templates
Captivate generates show notes and chapter markers and lets those artifacts stay editable inside the same publishing workflow. This matters when repeat releases need less manual formatting and when episode pages must align with a branded site experience.
Loudness normalization built into export and episode metadata workflows
Buzzsprout applies loudness normalization tied to export so episode levels stay consistent without separate mastering steps. That design choice supports teams that need repeatable loudness targets while keeping chapters and metadata workflows manageable.
Guided audio cleanup that turns uploads into ready-to-publish episodes
Alitu uses a guided workflow that cleans up audio and assembles episodes from uploaded source without deep multitrack routing control. This suits one-person shows that need consistent results with minimal mastering work and straightforward RSS feed output.
Double-ender multitrack capture with waveform edits per participant
Zencastr produces separate tracks per participant in a double-ender remote recording flow and adds browser waveform editing for quick fixes. This is a strong fit for distributed teams that need clean, separated takes before heavier editing.
Nondestructive multitrack editing with loudness monitoring and mastering-style checks
Hindenburg Pro focuses on nondestructive multitrack editing so processing stays adjustable during mastering passes without destroying waveform edits. It also provides loudness monitoring and integrated noise reduction tools inside the editing pipeline.
Pick a pod workflow pattern, then validate depth on multitrack, loudness, and publishing
Start by mapping the intended workflow pattern to a tool’s native strength, then validate the depth of recording and post-production before committing to hosted distribution. Castos, Podbean, and Transistor center on publishing and show admin, while Zencastr and Spreaker push earlier into recording and editing, and Hindenburg Pro pushes hardest into nondestructive production control.
Next, check where automation stops for your catalog size and how governance fits team operations. Captivate and Transistor automate transcription and chapter or metadata generation, while Spreaker, Buzzsprout, and Castos emphasize editing or syndication depth that may require external tooling for deeper mastering.
Choose the workflow center: hosted publishing, browser studio, or editor-first multitrack
Castos and Podbean center on hosted episode publishing with RSS-fed directory distribution, which fits teams that want the publishing system to act like the episode control plane. Spreaker centers on a browser studio workflow that connects recording and multitrack assembly, while Hindenburg Pro centers on nondestructive multitrack editing and loudness monitoring for producers who treat production as the primary work.
Match multitrack depth to your editing reality
If remote contributors need separate takes with minimal setup, Zencastr provides per-speaker tracks and lets editing start in-browser during or soon after the session. If complex fixes and mastering passes require nondestructive control, Hindenburg Pro’s multitrack nondestructive workflow is the closer match than hosted-only editors.
Validate loudness and mastering expectations against export behavior
Buzzsprout targets consistent integrated loudness through loudness normalization tied to export, which reduces the need for separate mastering steps. Spreaker and Hindenburg Pro can reach production-quality outcomes, but Spreaker’s advanced mastering may still require exporting to a dedicated DAW, while Hindenburg Pro is built to keep loudness checks inside the editing pipeline.
Decide how much publishing automation must be inside the same admin
Captivate is built around automated show notes and chapter creation with editable episode page templates, which reduces manual formatting work for repeat releases. Transistor also adds built-in transcription with chapter generation on episode publishing pages, while Alitu focuses on guided cleanup and episode assembly with RSS output rather than deep editorial customization.
Check governance and team workflow constraints before onboarding collaborators
If contributor control needs to be show-level rather than role-granular, Castos and several hosting-first tools keep governance more account and show oriented. If a team needs deeper operational controls and role-based governance, multiple tools in this list keep that area lighter, and larger-team publishing stacks may require external governance discipline alongside these products.
Plan remote recording handoff and double-ender pipeline gaps
Zencastr supports double-ender style capture and keeps session handoff inside the same recording workspace, which reduces mixing later. For browser-first and hosted publishing tools like Spreaker, remote and double-ender pipelines can depend on external recording setup, so integration into the team’s existing capture process should be validated early.
Which pod software pattern fits each team type
Different pod software tools fit different production shapes, like hosted syndication for publishing calendars or double-ender multitrack capture for distributed teams.
Selecting the wrong shape usually shows up as missing depth in multitrack control, extra external steps for mastering, or friction when automation and governance do not match team operations.
Teams that publish from WordPress and want RSS distribution to follow automatically
Castos fits this audience because it ties WordPress-centric publishing to hosted audio management and RSS feed updates. This also supports teams that want show assets organized for reuse rather than managing media in separate systems.
Teams that need a browser studio where recording and multitrack assembly happen together
Spreaker fits teams that want recording plus multitrack editing in the browser and a connected episode publishing workflow. It reduces round-trips to external editing tools when episode assembly and metadata work are recurring.
Creators that need branded episode pages and editable automated show notes and chapters
Captivate fits teams that want hosting plus episode pages with trackable listener journeys and automation for show notes and chapter generation. Its editable templates keep marketing-site constraints aligned with publishing output.
Distributed teams running remote double-ender sessions with per-speaker track separation
Zencastr fits distributed teams because it keeps separate tracks per participant and provides browser waveform editing within the session workspace. This supports quick early fixes without waiting for export to a full DAW.
Producers who prioritize nondestructive multitrack editing, loudness monitoring, and noise reduction in one editor
Hindenburg Pro fits teams that treat production as the core work and need nondestructive processing adjustable during mastering passes. It also integrates loudness monitoring and noise reduction tools into the editing pipeline for consistent outputs.
Pitfalls that cause rework in pod production and publishing workflows
Common mistakes come from choosing a tool optimized for hosting instead of production depth or assuming automation covers the full editorial pipeline. Several gaps show up around mastering workflow depth, remote capture handoff, and governance granularity.
These pitfalls can force manual relinking, extra exports, or repeated formatting work when teams scale beyond a single release pattern.
Buying a hosting-first tool for deep mastering passes
Castos and Podbean focus on hosted publishing and RSS-driven distribution, so complex mastering workflows tend to depend on external DAWs. Buzzsprout helps with loudness normalization tied to export, but advanced multitrack editing depth still depends on external workflows in practice.
Assuming browser editing covers every multitrack fix without export
Spreaker includes browser studio multitrack editing, but advanced mastering may require exporting to a dedicated DAW for certain workflows. If the edit style needs nondestructive multitrack control during mastering, Hindenburg Pro is the closer fit.
Underestimating remote recording setup requirements for double-ender handoff
Zencastr is designed for double-ender multitrack capture with participant separation, so remote sessions start with better audio organization. Tools like Spreaker and Transistor can require external double-ender or remote recording setup, which can add setup risk if the team lacks a standardized capture routine.
Relying on automation without validating transcription and diarization quality for edge cases
Captivate and Transistor provide transcription and chapter or note automation, but diarization accuracy can require manual review for edge cases. Teams that publish highly structured interviews should plan time for transcript correction rather than assuming chaptering is always perfect.
Overlooking governance limits for contributor collaboration beyond show ownership
Castos keeps contributor governance oriented around account and show rather than role-granular control, which can strain larger editorial teams. Spreaker also keeps governance more workspace role oriented than enterprise-grade RBAC, so additional admin process may be needed for controlled publishing.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Castos, Spreaker, Captivate, Buzzsprout, Podbean, Transistor, Acast, Zencastr, Hindenburg Pro, and Alitu using three criteria: features, ease of use, and value. Features carried the most weight at forty percent, while ease of use and value each accounted for thirty percent in the overall rating. This ranking reflects editorial research and criteria-based scoring using the capabilities and workflow details described for each tool, without private benchmark experiments or hands-on lab testing beyond what is captured in the provided review content.
Castos ranked highest because its WordPress integration connects episode publishing to hosted audio management and RSS feed updates, which raised its features and ease-of-use fit for WordPress-centered publishing workflows.
Frequently Asked Questions About pod software
How do Castos and Podbean handle RSS publishing from episode assets in the admin?
Which tools provide browser-based multitrack editing during remote recording sessions?
How does Captivate differ from Transistor for episode pages and listener-facing content?
When should a team choose Buzzsprout over Hindenburg Pro for loudness workflows?
What breaks if a workflow needs nondestructive multitrack session control instead of upload-and-process?
How do transcription and chapter markers work in Transistor compared with Zencastr?
Which tool best fits show notes and chapter automation for repeat releases?
How do SSO and access controls typically differ between Spreaker and production-focused desktop tools?
What is the practical tradeoff between Acast’s ad reporting linkage and a studio-first editor workflow?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Technology Digital Media alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of technology digital media tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare technology digital media tools→