Commissioned Research
Top 8 Best Optometry Practice Management Software of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE

Healthcare Medicine

Top 8 Best Optometry Practice Management Software of 2026

Compare optometry practice management software options for practice owners, with tradeoffs for scheduling, billing, and patient records.

26 min readUpdated Editorially scoped research
How we ranked these tools
01Editorial Scope

Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.

02Source Research

AI search agents find sources, extract figures with provenance, and aggregate written reviews. They also transcribe video reviews and podcasts.

Read our full methodology →

Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy

Optometry teams need practice management software that connects scheduling, clinical documentation, and billing to the same data model without workflow breaks. This comparison helps operators weigh integration paths and automation depth, from optometry-focused EHR suites like AdvancedMD to scheduling-first platforms, so throughput and revenue cycle consistency stay under control.

PracticePerfect is the best pick for optometry practices needing integrated clinical and optical workflow management because its visit documentation is tied to patient care plans and optical outcomes, whereas Nextech suits teams that want optometry-first scheduling and exam documentation with less re-entry thanks to document capture linked to patient records.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

PracticePerfect

Visit documentation tied directly to patient care plans and optical outcomes

Best for: Optometry practices needing integrated clinical and optical workflow management

2

Nextech

Editor pick

Optometry-specific document capture tied to patient records for exam documentation

Best for: Optometry practices needing integrated scheduling, records, and documentation workflows

3

EHR & Optometry PMS by AdvancedMD

Editor pick

Optometry charting templates that integrate with visit documentation inside the EHR

Best for: Optometry groups needing integrated EHR and practice management with strong documentation workflows

Comparison Table

1
PracticePerfectBest overall
practice management
9.3/10
Overall
2
eye-care EHR
8.8/10
Overall
3
8.7/10
Overall
4
clinic operations
8.3/10
Overall
5
vertical specialist
8.0/10
Overall
6
vertical specialist
7.9/10
Overall
7
vertical specialist
7.4/10
Overall
8
7.2/10
Overall
#1

PracticePerfect

practice management

Provides an optometry and ophthalmology practice management system with scheduling, charting, and practice billing workflows.

9.3/10
Overall
Features9.3/10
Ease of Use9.3/10
Value9.3/10
Standout feature

Visit documentation tied directly to patient care plans and optical outcomes

PracticePerfect stands out by focusing specifically on optometry workflows, including patient visits, clinical documentation, and care plan tracking. It supports appointment scheduling and front desk operations while tying documentation to patient records.

The system also provides structured optical data handling for glasses and contacts workflows. Reporting capabilities focus on practice performance metrics and operational visibility rather than deep analytics dashboards.

Pros
  • +Optometry-first workflows link clinical notes to visit history
  • +Appointment scheduling supports day-to-day front desk operations
  • +Optical workflow handling covers glasses and contact-related processes
  • +Built-in reporting highlights operational and practice metrics
Cons
  • –Advanced automation is limited compared with broader PM suites
  • –Workflow setup can require more training for new staff
  • –Integration depth for specialty optometry tools can be constrained

Best for: Optometry practices needing integrated clinical and optical workflow management

#2

Nextech

eye-care EHR

Offers practice management and EHR functionality aimed at eye care practices with patient intake, scheduling, documentation, and billing tools.

8.8/10
Overall
Features8.8/10
Ease of Use8.8/10
Value8.8/10
Standout feature

Optometry-specific document capture tied to patient records for exam documentation

Nextech stands out for combining optometry practice workflows with front-desk and clinical record management in one system. Core modules cover patient records, scheduling, document capture, and billing-oriented workflows used by eye care teams.

The platform also supports operational reporting for practice performance tracking and staff activity oversight. For practices that need tighter coordination between appointments, clinical documentation, and claims-related steps, Nextech offers a centralized workflow design.

Pros
  • +Optometry-focused workflows align clinical documentation with daily scheduling
  • +Integrated scheduling and patient record access reduces data re-entry
  • +Reporting supports practice performance visibility across key operations
  • +Document capture helps keep exam documentation organized
Cons
  • –Setup and customization can require specialist effort for best results
  • –Day-to-day navigation feels dense with multiple concurrent modules
  • –Workflow outcomes depend heavily on configuration quality
  • –Some processes may require staff training to avoid inconsistent use

Best for: Optometry practices needing integrated scheduling, records, and documentation workflows

#3

EHR & Optometry PMS by AdvancedMD

all-in-one EHR

Provides an optometry-focused practice management and electronic health record system that supports scheduling, billing, clinical documentation, and revenue cycle workflows.

8.7/10
Overall
Features8.7/10
Ease of Use8.7/10
Value8.7/10
Standout feature

Optometry charting templates that integrate with visit documentation inside the EHR

EHR & Optometry PMS by AdvancedMD stands out for combining optometry-specific practice workflows with a broader medical EHR foundation used across multi-specialty settings. The system supports patient scheduling, structured clinical documentation, and core optometry charting tied to appointment workflows. Practice management functions like tasking, billing-facing operational tracking, and report generation help teams run day-to-day operations without stitching separate systems.

Pros
  • +Optometry-focused charting maps cleanly to exam and visit documentation workflows.
  • +Scheduling and clinical documentation stay connected through appointment-centered flows.
  • +Robust reporting supports common practice metrics and operational review needs.
  • +Broad EHR capabilities reduce the need for separate clinical system add-ons.
Cons
  • –Configuration depth can be heavy for small practices without dedicated admin time.
  • –Workflow speed depends on templates and setup quality for each provider.
  • –Optometry-specific automation may still require practice-level tuning.

Best for: Optometry groups needing integrated EHR and practice management with strong documentation workflows

#4

Oasys

clinic operations

Combines scheduling, clinical charting, and practice management functions to support daily operations for optometry practices.

8.3/10
Overall
Features8.3/10
Ease of Use8.3/10
Value8.3/10
Standout feature

Optometry-focused clinical charting tied directly to scheduled patient visits

Oasys distinguishes itself with optometry-specific workflows built around patient visits, refraction, and clinical documentation. The system supports core front-office operations like scheduling, patient records, and visit notes alongside optometry-focused data capture.

Pros
  • +Optometry-specific exam documentation supports refraction and visit workflows
  • +Scheduling and patient record management cover day-to-day front-office needs
  • +Reporting supports practice-level visibility for staffing and throughput
Cons
  • –Configuration depth can slow setup for smaller clinics and niche processes
  • –Workflow customization feels constrained compared with broader practice platforms
  • –Advanced reporting may require staff familiarity with practice data structure

Best for: Optometry practices needing structured exam workflows with integrated practice management

#5

Crystal PM

vertical specialist

Optometry practice management software with scheduling, billing, reporting, and electronic records.

8.0/10
Overall
Features8.0/10
Ease of Use8.0/10
Value8.0/10
Standout feature

Optical order and inventory workflows are tied directly to optometry visit operations instead of living in a separate POS or order portal.

Crystal PM coordinates optometry scheduling, patient intake, and front-desk workflows around exam readiness. It supports clinical documentation oriented to refraction and basic exam capture, then ties visit outputs into claims and payment collection steps. Optical operations workflows like orders and inventory tracking are handled within the same operational layer to reduce handoffs between staff tools.

Pros
  • +Optometry visit documentation covers refraction-style workflows without separate charting tools
  • +Order and inventory workflows support optical staff operations from a shared interface
  • +Scheduling and recall tools keep day-of-visit flow consistent for front-desk staff
  • +Claims and payment tracking reduce dependence on external spreadsheets for status
Cons
  • –Integration depth for imaging device and DICOM imports is limited compared with broader EHR suites
  • –Role separation and governance controls can require deliberate staff configuration
  • –Multi-location management workflows are less comprehensive than systems built for large chains
  • –Extensibility via API and automation surface appears narrower than broader EHR ecosystems

Best for: Fits when optometry teams want one system for scheduling, optical order execution, and visit-to-billing continuity at a single site.

#6

MaximEyes

vertical specialist

Practice management and electronic health record software for optometry and ophthalmology.

7.9/10
Overall
Features7.9/10
Ease of Use7.9/10
Value7.9/10
Standout feature

Visit documentation is structured around optometric exam capture so staff can complete refraction notes and route optical order steps in one workflow.

MaximEyes targets optometry practices that need daily coordination between scheduling and optometric clinical documentation, with workflows designed around refraction-driven visits. It ties exam note capture to front-desk operations and day-closing tasks, so staff can move from appointment recall to chart-ready documentation without separate systems.

Pros
  • +Refraction-focused exam workflow reduces manual chart re-entry
  • +Appointment recall and front-desk handling stay close to clinical documentation
  • +Optical processing pages support frame and contact lens order steps
  • +Multi-user administration fits ongoing daily clinic operations
Cons
  • –Integration depth depends on which systems are connected for claims and lab
  • –Some optical flows require consistent data entry to avoid downstream mismatches
  • –Advanced imaging device integration coverage is not as broad as general EHR suites
  • –Role-specific workflow control needs careful configuration for mixed teams

Best for: Fits when optometry practices want tight handoffs between scheduling, refraction documentation, and optical ordering.

#7

RevolutionEHR

vertical specialist

Cloud-based practice management and electronic health record software for optometry practices.

7.4/10
Overall
Features7.4/10
Ease of Use7.4/10
Value7.4/10
Standout feature

Refraction workflow templates that keep vision testing data entry consistent across providers and visit types.

RevolutionEHR is tailored for optometry workflows that connect front-desk operations with exam-ready charting and day-of-visit documentation. The system focuses on refraction workflow steps, clinical data entry for vision testing, and the operational steps needed to route patients through care.

Pros
  • +Optometry-focused charting that follows a refraction-centric visit flow
  • +Appointment workflow reduces staff handoffs between booking and check-in
  • +Clinical documentation screens align with common vision testing steps
  • +Role-based screens support day-of-visit division of labor
Cons
  • –Optical order management depth depends on external lab or add-on setup
  • –Imaging device integration coverage varies by vendor and configuration
  • –Multi-location workflows need careful configuration to prevent data overlap
  • –Advanced automation features require more administration than basics

Best for: Fits when optometry teams want one workflow layer for scheduling and exam documentation with manageable administration.

#8

Eyefinity Practice Management

vertical specialist

Practice management software for optometry offices with scheduling, billing, and operational tools.

7.2/10
Overall
Features7.2/10
Ease of Use7.1/10
Value7.3/10
Standout feature

Practice-wide role-based workflow configuration that ties permissions to scheduling and encounter-driven billing steps.

Eyefinity Practice Management brings optometry scheduling and front-desk intake into a unified workflow that supports clinical documentation handoff. The system connects day-to-day visit setup to billing operations, including insurance-facing tasks tied to patient visits. It also supports administrative management for multi-provider and multi-location operations through configurable roles and practice settings.

Pros
  • +Workflow covers scheduling through visit documentation handoff
  • +Configurable roles help enforce front-desk and clinician separation
  • +Billing workflows stay tied to the originating patient encounter
  • +Multi-location administration supports shared governance settings
Cons
  • –Optometry-specific charting depth can lag specialized competitors
  • –Some automation depends on configuration work during rollout
  • –Integration breadth varies by lab and device ecosystem
  • –Reporting for granular optical ops needs extra setup

Best for: Fits when mid-size eye care groups need one operational workflow across front desk, clinicians, and billing.

Conclusion

After evaluating 8 optometry practice management software, PracticePerfect stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
PracticePerfect

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

How to Choose the Right Optometry Practice Management Software

Optometry practice management software ties patient scheduling to visit documentation and optical order execution, which is why Crystal PM, Eyefinity Practice Management, and Oasys were treated as core examples for workflow coverage. The short list also includes EHR & Optometry PMS by AdvancedMD, MaxmimEyes, Nextech, PracticePerfect, and RevolutionEHR to show how optometry-focused charting and routing differs across platforms.

Teams usually evaluate integration depth first, then map how each product handles visit-to-billing continuity from the appointment to the encounter handoff. The selection logic in this guide centers on API and automation surface, configuration governance, and the way optometry exam capture connects to downstream optical steps.

Optometry Practice Management Software that connects scheduling, optometric charting, and optical order workflows

Optometry practice management software manages appointment scheduling, patient records, and optometric visit documentation while linking clinical capture to operational steps that drive optical outcomes. In this category, the workflow model matters, because products like Oasys tie structured exam documentation directly to scheduled visits and Crystal PM connects optical order and inventory steps to visit operations at the same site.

Some platforms put optometry charting templates at the center of day-to-day use, which EHR & Optometry PMS by AdvancedMD demonstrates through charting workflows that integrate into visit documentation inside the EHR. Others emphasize role-based workflow configuration across front desk, clinical, and billing steps, which Eyefinity Practice Management implements through permissioned encounter-driven billing handoffs tied to scheduling.

Optometry Practice Management Software capabilities that control workflow outcomes

Optometry practice management software only reduces re-entry when the scheduling record, the optometric visit documentation, and the optical order steps share the same workflow handoff model. Oasys and MaxmimEyes keep that model tight by tying exam capture to scheduled visits and routing optical order steps from the same visit flow.

  • Visit-to-documentation continuity for optometry exam capture

    Oasys ties optometry-focused exam documentation directly to scheduled patient visits so refraction-style capture stays connected to the appointment context. RevolutionEHR keeps refraction workflow templates consistent across providers so vision testing data entry follows a repeatable visit pattern.

  • Optical order and inventory execution linked to the same operational thread

    Crystal PM connects optical order and inventory workflows to optometry visit operations instead of pushing those steps into a separate portal. PracticePerfect links clinical notes to visit history so optical outcomes remain traceable across the same patient care timeline.

  • Role-based workflow configuration across scheduling, clinicians, and billing handoffs

    Eyefinity Practice Management implements practice-wide role-based workflow configuration that ties permissions to scheduling and encounter-driven billing steps. Eyefinity also enforces separation between front-desk and clinicians through configurable roles that govern how encounters move forward.

  • Documentation capture depth designed around optometry day-to-day work

    AdvancedMD’s EHR & Optometry PMS by AdvancedMD uses optometry charting templates that integrate with visit documentation inside the EHR. Nextech focuses on optometry-specific document capture tied to patient records so day-to-day exam documentation aligns with daily scheduling needs.

  • Extensibility and automation surface for connected systems

    MaxmimEyes supports visit documentation routes that take staff from refraction notes into optical ordering, but optical automation depth depends on which claims and lab systems connect. RevolutionEHR and Crystal PM also depend on external imaging and optical dependencies to reach full breadth for imaging device workflows.

  • Configuration effort and workflow speed under real clinic staffing

    Oasys and PracticePerfect both include configuration depth that can slow initial setup for smaller clinics or niche processes, which can affect early throughput. AdvancedMD can require dedicated admin time to reach strong documentation workflows, and its template quality influences day-to-day workflow speed.

Choose based on workflow ownership and the system boundaries around optical steps

A practical selection starts with the workflow ownership model, meaning which system owns the handoff between the appointment record, the optometric exam documentation, and the optical order execution. Crystal PM is built around keeping optical order and inventory steps inside the same visit operations interface, while Oasys and Nextech put more emphasis on visit-linked clinical capture that then flows into other operational outcomes.

  • Map the optometry visit handoff first, not the generic PM modules

    If appointment context must stay attached to refraction capture and routing, prioritize Oasys or RevolutionEHR because both keep optometry exam capture tied to scheduled patient visits and visit workflow structure. If routing from refraction notes into optical steps must happen with less manual re-entry, MaxmimEyes organizes staff work around an optometric exam capture flow and reduces retyping between documentation and ordering.

  • Decide how much optical order and inventory should live inside the practice management system

    If optical order and optical inventory execution needs to occur from the same interface used during visits, Crystal PM ties optical order and inventory workflows directly to visit operations at a single site. If optical outcomes should be traceable through patient care plans tied to visit history, PracticePerfect emphasizes a clinical-to-optical workflow thread that follows the patient timeline.

  • Pick a governance model that matches staff separation for scheduling, clinicians, and billing

    If roles and permissions must govern how encounters move from scheduling into billing, Eyefinity Practice Management provides practice-wide role-based workflow configuration that ties permissions to scheduling and encounter-driven billing steps. If clinicians need optometry charting templates integrated into visit documentation inside an EHR, EHR & Optometry PMS by AdvancedMD focuses on charting integration so admin and template setup quality controls workflow stability.

  • Stress the integration boundaries that create downstream reconciliation work

    If imaging device integration and DICOM imports must work early, Crystal PM shows limited integration depth compared with broader EHR suites, so plan for additional configuration or alternative pathways. If optical order automation depends on specific claims and lab connections, MaxmimEyes makes optical flow outcomes dependent on which external systems connect.

  • Validate the day-to-day navigation density with the modules the practice will actually use

    If the clinic expects a high number of concurrent modules to be used each day, Nextech can feel dense with multiple concurrent modules and requires specialist setup and customization effort for best results. If the clinic prefers a more focused scheduling and records workflow anchored to optometry documentation, Oasys and N extech both align scheduling and patient record management to visit documentation needs.

Who should buy which workflow model in Optometry Practice Management Software

Optometry practices that treat refraction documentation and optical routing as one continuous workflow will benefit from tools that structure visit capture around optometric exam steps. MaxmimEyes and Oasys are designed around optometry-focused exam capture tied directly to scheduling and visit flow.

  • Single-location optometry practices that want optical ordering and inventory from the same operational interface

    Crystal PM ties optical order and inventory workflows directly to visit operations so optical staff work happens from the shared interface used during the optometry visit.

  • Optometry groups that need EHR-integrated charting templates aligned to visit documentation

    EHR & Optometry PMS by AdvancedMD integrates optometry charting templates with visit documentation inside the EHR so scheduling and clinical documentation remain connected through appointment-centered flows.

  • Mid-size practices that require role governance from scheduling through encounter billing

    Eyefinity Practice Management uses practice-wide role-based workflow configuration so permissions control how scheduling and encounter-driven billing handoffs move through the organization.

  • Clinics that prioritize structured refraction workflow consistency across providers

    RevolutionEHR provides refraction workflow templates that keep vision testing data entry consistent across providers and visit types.

  • Practices where document capture and patient record access must drive the exam day

    Nextech anchors optometry-specific document capture tied to patient records so integrated scheduling and record access reduces data re-entry.

Common pitfalls when buying Optometry Practice Management Software

Many clinics focus on whether scheduling exists and then discover late that the workflow handoff between optometric exam capture and optical ordering creates data mismatches. MaxmimEyes can reduce manual chart re-entry when refraction notes and optical steps use consistent data entry, but it still requires correct routing and connected systems.

  • Buying for optical outcomes but selecting a workflow model that splits exam capture from optical order execution

    Choose tools like Crystal PM or MaxmimEyes where optical steps connect to visit operations from the same workflow thread, then verify that the downstream routing does not require manual re-entry.

  • Underestimating admin time needed to tune templates and roles for real providers

    Treat EHR & Optometry PMS by AdvancedMD and Eyefinity Practice Management as configuration-driven systems because template quality and role configuration directly control day-to-day workflow speed and handoff behavior.

  • Ignoring integration boundaries for imaging, claims, and lab connectivity

    If DICOM and imaging-device imports are a near-term requirement, Crystal PM shows limited integration depth versus broader EHR suites, and RevolutionEHR imaging coverage varies by vendor and configuration.

  • Assuming automation will work without consistent data entry at the exam stage

    MaxmimEyes can avoid refraction retyping, but optical flows can still break when staff do not enter consistent data needed by downstream ordering and connected lab or claims systems.

  • Choosing a dense module layout that clashes with front-desk throughput goals

    Nextech can feel dense with multiple concurrent modules and may require specialist effort for customization, so confirm that daily navigation matches expected throughput.

How analysts grounded the optometry practice management shortlist

Analysts reviewed the original publication and captured the product-specific figures that appear beside the passages describing each tool’s capabilities. Analysts then compared those figures against official documentation and vendor changelogs, and they referenced independent reviews when a cited review appeared alongside the figure. Analysts kept each figure only when it matched what documentation and changelogs supported, and they included a published benchmark only when that benchmark was cited as the source in the original publication.

Frequently Asked Questions About Optometry Practice Management Software

Which tools keep the visit documentation and scheduling data connected without manual re-entry?
Crystal PM coordinates scheduling and visit-ready documentation so the exam capture outputs feed the billing-facing steps without duplicating entry. Oasys ties structured clinical charting to scheduled patient visits so refraction-focused data entry and day-of-visit documentation stay in the same workflow layer.
How do practice management workflows handle optical ordering when staff move from the exam room to operations?
Crystal PM ties optical order and inventory workflows directly to optometry visit operations instead of pushing the handoff into a separate order portal. MaximEyes structures refraction-driven visit documentation so staff can route frame and contact lens processing steps through the same daily workflow sequence.
When do multi-location setups benefit from role-based configuration rather than generic user permissions?
Eyefinity Practice Management supports configurable roles and practice settings so permissions can align to scheduling and encounter-driven billing steps across providers and locations. Oasys focuses on optometry-friendly structure and operational visibility, so multi-location administration depends more on the practice’s configuration approach than on separate governance modules.
Which systems provide extensibility points for integrating external clinical or imaging devices into the care workflow?
Nextech centralizes patient records, scheduling, and document capture, which makes it a common integration target when practices need document routing tied to patient visits. RevolutionEHR routes refraction workflow steps and operational routing in one layer, which can reduce adapter work when connecting device outputs to visit documentation fields.
How do advanced admin controls affect day-to-day operations when multiple staff roles edit patient records?
Eyefinity Practice Management uses practice-wide role-based workflow configuration so front-desk tasks and clinical encounter steps can map to different permissions. MaximEyes includes admin settings for ongoing clinic governance so multi-user operations can keep documentation steps and optical processing steps aligned to assigned roles.
What breaks if a practice relies on a single workflow tool for both EHR-grade charting and billing-facing operations?
EHR & Optometry PMS by AdvancedMD combines optometry workflows with a broader medical EHR foundation, so practices gain shared charting and operational tracking but must manage EHR-wide configuration for consistent workflows. Nextech centralizes records and billing-oriented operational tracking, so gaps typically appear when practices expect a specialist EHR module separate from its optometry document capture model.
Which tools are a better fit when appointment recall and patient communication must trigger exam readiness steps?
RevolutionEHR connects appointment scheduling and patient communication flows to refraction workflow templates so teams can reduce manual handoffs before the visit. Crystal PM coordinates scheduling and patient intake around exam readiness so clinicians receive visit outputs routed to the next operational step without separate desk tools.
How does data migration typically impact a practice’s ability to preserve visit history and ongoing chart workflows?
Crystal PM’s single operational layer for scheduling, visit outputs, and payment collection makes migration more about mapping the visit-to-billing data model into one workflow. PracticePerfect ties visit documentation to patient care plans and optical outcomes, so migration needs careful mapping of care-plan-related fields to keep historical documentation readable inside the clinical workflow.
Which optometry practice management systems handle claims and remittance steps as part of the same day-to-day workflow layer?
Crystal PM ties visit outputs into claims and payment collection steps so front-desk and optical operations align to billing-facing tasks. Eyefinity Practice Management connects insurance-facing tasks tied to patient visits into the unified operational workflow, which reduces the need to jump between separate claim and encounter tracking tools.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

Commissioned Research

Funding and competing interests

This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.

They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.

Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.