
GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Technology Digital MediaTop 10 Best Ms Backup Software of 2026
Ranking of top ms backup software tools for IT teams, with notes on BackupAssist, NovaBACKUP, and BDRSuite tradeoffs and strengths.
How we ranked these tools
An editor sets the topic, the inclusion criteria, and the evaluation framework before research starts.
AI search agents find sources, extract figures with provenance, and aggregate written reviews. They also transcribe video reviews and podcasts.
Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
BackupAssist is the best fit for Windows-heavy IT teams managing lots of servers and Hyper-V workloads, while NovaBACKUP is a cheaper entry point if you need consistent restore workflows, and Bacula Enterprise works best where catalog-driven governance across many servers matters.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
BackupAssist
Recovery Assistant workflows that use BackupAssist catalog data to guide granular restore decisions.
Best for: Fits when IT teams manage many Windows server workloads and need repeatable, granular restores.
NovaStor NovaBACKUP
Editor pickBackup catalog indexing drives targeted restores and reduces repository re-scan time during recovery operations.
Best for: Fits when Windows teams need consistent restore workflows across many servers with catalog-based recoveries.
BDRSuite
Editor pickRestore-point catalog with granular selection reduces recovery time when only specific files or items need restoration.
Best for: Fits when an IT team needs Windows-first backup orchestration with catalog-driven granular restores.
Comparison Table
BackupAssist
SMBServer backup software designed for Windows Server and Hyper-V environments.
Recovery Assistant workflows that use BackupAssist catalog data to guide granular restore decisions.
BackupAssist is designed for Microsoft-centric estates where administrators need application-consistent backups and practical restore navigation without manual media hunting. Its catalog and recovery workflow support granular selection for common Microsoft data without requiring operators to rebuild restore steps each time. VSS-aware snapshot orchestration helps keep backups aligned with application consistency expectations for Windows workloads.
A tradeoff appears in environments that expect deep infrastructure-level integrations such as hypervisor-native backup orchestration across large virtual fleets. BackupAssist can still protect virtual Windows guests via supported agents and Windows recovery workflows, but some teams rely on hypervisor tools for broader VM lifecycle mapping. The best fit is a datacenter or mid-market IT team that wants centralized job management, retention governance, and repeatable restore procedures across many Windows servers.
- +VSS-aware backup orchestration for Windows application consistency
- +Catalog-driven restore selection for faster granular recovery decisions
- +Centralized backup job management across multiple Windows servers
- +Retention controls with reporting for traceable backup runs
- –Best results depend on careful configuration of protected workload settings
- –Some hypervisor-native orchestration needs are better handled by platform tools
Microsoft infrastructure teams
Daily backups across multiple Windows servers
Consistent restores during incidents
Messaging administrators
Targeted mailbox or data item restores
Lower downtime for users
Show 1 more scenario
Mid-size IT operations
Audit-friendly backup reporting
Reduced time to verification
Administrators use run history and reporting to track backup success and availability of restore points.
Best for: Fits when IT teams manage many Windows server workloads and need repeatable, granular restores.
NovaStor NovaBACKUP
SMBBackup software for Windows Server environments with local and cloud targets.
Backup catalog indexing drives targeted restores and reduces repository re-scan time during recovery operations.
NovaStor NovaBACKUP fits teams that need consistent Windows Server protection across physical servers and common virtual environments, with policy-style job definitions and repeatable run schedules. The restore experience is built around a backup catalog that enables targeted restores without re-scanning repositories for every recovery. Catalog-backed browsing also helps when multiple backups are stored across a repository and retention rules are applied over time.
A practical tradeoff is that deeper application-consistent setups can require more upfront design and validation than basic file-only backup plans. NovaBACKUP works well when Microsoft workloads need predictable restore paths during incidents and when governance requires controlled scheduling, monitored job status, and repeatable retention behavior.
- +Central console manages multi-server policies and restores
- +Backup catalog supports indexed browsing and faster target selection
- +Retention rules apply directly to scheduled jobs and restore points
- +Bare-metal recovery workflow targets full system rebuild scenarios
- –Application-consistent configuration takes more upfront testing time
- –Large restore catalogs can increase console responsiveness limits
- –Some advanced integrations rely on specific environment components
IT operations teams
Daily Windows Server backup scheduling
Faster time-to-restore decisions
Disaster recovery planners
Bare-metal restore readiness
Reduced recovery planning friction
Show 1 more scenario
System administrators
Targeted file recovery during incidents
Granular restores without extra scans
Catalog browsing helps locate the right restore point for specific directories and files.
Best for: Fits when Windows teams need consistent restore workflows across many servers with catalog-based recoveries.
BDRSuite
SMBBackup and disaster recovery for virtual, physical and cloud workloads.
Restore-point catalog with granular selection reduces recovery time when only specific files or items need restoration.
BDRSuite is organized around backup policies that define what to protect, how often to run, and where backup data lands in the repository. Restore operations are driven by a backup catalog that lets administrators pick restore points and recover individual items instead of always performing a full restore. Snapshot behavior for supported hypervisors relies on VSS-aware mechanisms when protecting Windows systems, which helps keep application-consistent captures for many common workload types.
A key tradeoff is that agent-based coverage creates ongoing management overhead across endpoints and servers, especially when IP changes or OS rebuilds require re-provisioning. A strong usage situation is an IT team that needs consistent Windows server recovery workflows and predictable retention scheduling for on-prem workloads, while maintaining catalog-driven granular restores.
- +Centralized backup policy management across servers and virtual machines
- +Restore-point catalog supports item-level recovery without full restores
- +VSS integration improves consistency for many Windows workload types
- +Role-based administration supports separation of backup operators
- –Agent-based deployment adds lifecycle overhead for frequently changing servers
- –Granular application restore depends on installed integration components
Windows infrastructure teams
Recover deleted files from server backups
Shortened recovery for file-level incidents
Small IT operations
Run scheduled backups across mixed hosts
Consistent backup cadence
Show 1 more scenario
Data protection administrators
Validate restore readiness during incident drills
Repeatable restore testing
Restore workflows tied to catalog entries help teams rehearse recovery without manual backup discovery.
Best for: Fits when an IT team needs Windows-first backup orchestration with catalog-driven granular restores.
Datto SIRIS
SMBAll-in-one BCDR appliance with on-site and cloud backup for servers.
Recovery-oriented restore workflow paired with a backup catalog for granular browse and restore decisions.
Datto SIRIS is a network backup and recovery appliance used by IT teams that need a managed path from backup jobs to restore testing. It combines local storage and offsite replication with a recovery-oriented workflow for VMware and Hyper-V environments.
The product includes a backup catalog for browsing and restoring selected objects rather than whole-machine rollbacks. SIRIS also supports retention policies and immutable storage options for ransomware-focused protection routines.
- +Recovery-focused restore workflow with object-level restore options
- +Built-in offsite replication that reduces manual disaster recovery steps
- +Retention policy controls tied to backup job scheduling
- +Immutable storage options support ransomware-resistant retention
- –Appliance-centric design limits fit for highly distributed edge footprints
- –Restore troubleshooting can require deeper familiarity with image catalogs
Best for: Fits when IT teams want appliance-based backups with guided restore testing and offsite replication.
AOMEI Backupper Server
SMBWindows Server backup and restore software with disk imaging and cloning.
VSS integration for application-consistent snapshots during scheduled server backups without manual quiescing steps.
AOMEI Backupper Server creates Windows server backups with VSS-aware snapshot behavior for application-consistent protection during live workloads. The product supports full, incremental, and differential schedules with retention rules and multiple destination types for a dedicated backup repository workflow.
Administrators can perform restore operations down to files and volumes and can recover systems with bare-metal oriented options for faster rebuilds after disk failure. Management focuses on Windows server agents and restore tooling rather than a centralized cloud control plane.
- +VSS-aware snapshots support consistent backups of active Windows workloads
- +Flexible schedule mix supports full plus incremental or differential capture
- +Volume and file restore paths cover both granular and full recovery needs
- +Centralized admin UI for scheduling, monitoring, and selecting restore points
- –No documented API or automation interface for external orchestration
- –Bare-metal recovery workflows are narrower than dedicated disaster recovery suites
- –Change tracking and deduplication options are limited versus appliance-focused products
- –Cross-platform management and RBAC-style governance controls are not a core strength
Best for: Fits when Windows server teams need reliable scheduled backups and operator-led restore workflows without API-driven orchestration.
Nakivo Backup & Replication
SMBBackup solution for VMware, Hyper-V, and Microsoft SQL Server environments.
Built-in management API for orchestrating backup jobs, monitoring state, and integrating reporting systems.
Nakivo Backup & Replication fits midsize Microsoft shops that need one system for hypervisor-level backup, agent-based workload protection, and fast recovery targets. The product covers VMware and Hyper-V protection with VSS-aware Windows snapshot coordination and supports app-consistent database workflows through workload-aware backup jobs.
It also provides a centralized backup catalog, retention policies, and granular restore paths across servers, VMs, and Microsoft mailbox data. Automation is driven through job templates, scheduled policies, and a documented management API used for orchestration and monitoring integrations.
- +VSS-aware snapshots for consistent Windows server recovery workflows
- +Granular VM restore with catalog-driven browse and file-level options
- +Management API supports automation for job orchestration and reporting
- +Retention policy controls are integrated into the backup job lifecycle
- –Advanced automation and reporting needs more admin discipline
- –Cross-tenant governance requires careful RBAC setup and review
- –Mailbox restore workflows can take longer than VM restores
- –Large environments need tuning to maintain predictable throughput
Best for: Fits when Microsoft-centric teams need VSS-aware VM protection plus mailbox restore and automation.
Bacula Enterprise
enterpriseOpen-source-based enterprise backup software supporting Windows and Microsoft SQL Server.
Central backup catalog records drive granular restore selection and retention enforcement across scheduled jobs.
Bacula Enterprise differentiates itself from many Windows-focused backup tools by offering a policy-driven backup catalog with cross-platform storage targets. It supports scheduled backups, retention handling, and granular restore workflows driven by catalog metadata rather than a single monolithic GUI.
Administrators can extend behavior through Bacula components and configuration files that cover jobs, clients, and storage directives. For environments needing consistent governance across many hosts, Bacula Enterprise centers control in its scheduling and catalog model.
- +Policy-driven jobs and retention mapped to a central backup catalog
- +Granular restores driven by catalog records for files and volumes
- +Configuration-driven automation for jobs, clients, and storage directives
- +Supports varied backup targets through extensible storage configuration
- –Operational setup and tuning demand configuration discipline
- –GUI workflows are limited compared with appliance-oriented tools
- –Advanced automation often depends on administrators editing job definitions
- –Windows application consistency workflows can require additional planning
Best for: Fits when IT teams need catalog-driven governance across many servers and prefer configuration-defined backup jobs.
Hasleo Backup Suite
SMBFree Windows backup and clone software for servers and workstations.
Bare-metal recovery media workflows that pair with the backup catalog to rebuild systems after storage-level failure.
Hasleo Backup Suite targets Windows server and workstation protection with a workflow that combines backup tasks, restore points, and disk or network repository management. It supports both image-level and file-level protection for physical machines and common virtualization environments, with VSS-aware snapshots used for application-consistent points when enabled.
The suite focuses on granular restore and bare-metal recovery paths for machines that need full rebuild after storage failure. Its administrative surface is built around task scheduling, retention controls, and a backup catalog that records what exists in the repository.
- +VSS-aware snapshot integration for more consistent restore points
- +Bare-metal recovery support for full server rebuild scenarios
- +Backup catalog improves what exists in the repository and restore targeting
- +Granular restore supports selecting files and folders from backups
- –Centralized RBAC and delegated administration are limited for large IT orgs
- –Automation and extensibility depend on task configuration rather than an external API
Best for: Fits when Windows-heavy teams need image and file restore plus bare-metal recovery without complex orchestration.
Kopia
API-firstOpen-source, cross-platform backup tool with deduplication and encryption.
Content-addressed repository with a backup catalog enables fast, versioned restores without rebuild-heavy synthetic full workflows.
Kopia performs disk and VM backup by writing content-addressed data into a repository and indexing it with a local backup catalog. It supports incremental forever behavior through deduplication and file and block level workflows via agents for common environments.
Restore targets can be granular at file and directory levels, with catalog-driven discovery of versions. Governance is handled through repository configuration, access controls for the repository endpoints, and auditable backup metadata stored in the catalog.
- +Content-addressed repository reduces duplicate writes across backup histories
- +Catalog-driven restores support version browsing and targeted recovery
- +Encryption is built into the repository workflow for data at rest
- +Runs from common clients with minimal platform-specific dependencies
- –VM and application consistency depend on external integration for some scenarios
- –Repository and retention hygiene need clear operational ownership
- –Large-scale deployments require attention to catalog growth and indexing throughput
Best for: Fits when teams need deduplicated, encrypted backup with reliable versioned restores.
MiniTool ShadowMaker
SMBWindows backup and recovery software for files, systems, and partitions.
Bootable recovery media creation that supports bare-metal style recovery when Windows cannot start.
MiniTool ShadowMaker targets Windows system and data protection with image-based backups and a recovery-focused workflow for PCs and servers. It supports schedule-based jobs, incremental backups, and bootable recovery media to recover systems when the OS is unusable.
The product emphasizes granular restore from backup images, plus VSS integration for application-consistent snapshots when VSS writers are present. Administration is primarily centered on console-managed backup tasks rather than an external API or multi-admin governance layer.
- +Image-based backups with bootable recovery media for offline restores
- +Incremental backup scheduling reduces backup windows for changing systems
- +Granular restore supports recovering specific files without reinstalling the OS
- +VSS-aware snapshot capture improves consistency for active Windows workloads
- –Limited enterprise automation surface compared with IT-oriented backup suites
- –Backup catalogs and reporting lack deep audit logging controls
- –Cross-platform protection for non-Windows targets is not a primary strength
- –Agent deployment and storage planning still require setup discipline
Best for: Fits when small IT teams need Windows image backups with fast recovery and file-level restore.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 ms backup software, BackupAssist stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Ms Backup Software
This guide covers the main options in ms backup software for Windows server and Microsoft workload protection, including BackupAssist, NovaBACKUP, BDRSuite, Datto SIRIS, and Backup & Replication from Nakivo. Each tool review focuses on how restore selection works, how Windows application consistency is handled, and how much automation and governance the admin layer provides.
The included tools also differ in restore ergonomics, since BackupAssist, NovaStor NovaBACKUP, and BDRSuite rely on backup catalog indexing to narrow recovery scope. The list also includes catalog-driven governance with Bacula Enterprise, appliance-centric recovery workflows with Datto SIRIS, and repository-driven version browsing with Kopia.
MS Backup Software for Windows servers and Microsoft workloads with catalog-driven recovery
MS backup software refers to backup platforms that protect Windows server workloads and Microsoft data with Windows-aware consistency mechanisms, recoverable catalogs, and restore workflows built around granular selection. BackupAssist and NovaStor NovaBACKUP both lean on backup catalog data to drive targeted restore decisions and reduce re-scan time during recovery operations.
Across the tools in this guide, Windows consistency behavior is shaped by VSS-aware snapshot orchestration or VSS integration, and restore depth depends on whether the catalog can support object-level or item-level browse. The operational differences show up in admin controls like centralized policy management in BackupAssist and Bacula Enterprise, plus automation surfaces like Nakivo Backup & Replication’s built-in management API.
Windows restore ergonomics, catalog governance, and automation surfaces
Restore decisions fail when the admin cannot narrow scope quickly from backup history, because the catalog and browse layer determine how fast the right objects appear during recovery. For Windows server workloads and Microsoft data, these decisions also hinge on how VSS-aware backup orchestration and restore workflows produce application-consistent restore points without operator guesswork.
Catalog-driven restore selection and granular browse
BackupAssist uses catalog data inside Recovery Assistant workflows to guide granular restore decisions. NovaStor NovaBACKUP indexes a backup catalog to drive targeted restores and reduce repository re-scan time during recovery operations.
VSS-aware Windows application consistency handling
BackupAssist includes VSS-aware backup orchestration for Windows application consistency. AOMEI Backupper Server provides VSS integration for application-consistent snapshots during scheduled server backups.
Policy management and retention enforcement in the admin layer
Bacula Enterprise maps retention policy to a central backup catalog so retention enforcement follows scheduled jobs. BackupAssist concentrates multi-server policy management in a central console to keep protected workload settings consistent across servers.
Automation and API surface for backup job orchestration
Nakivo Backup & Replication includes a built-in management API to orchestrate backup jobs and monitoring state. MiniTool ShadowMaker focuses on bootable recovery media creation and has a limited enterprise automation surface compared with IT-oriented backup suites.
Restore-point catalog workflows for targeted item recovery
BDRSuite uses a restore-point catalog that supports granular selection to reduce recovery time when only specific files or items need restoration. Datto SIRIS pairs recovery-oriented restore workflows with a backup catalog for guided browse and restore decisions.
Bare-metal recovery workflow coverage for Windows rebuild scenarios
Hasleo Backup Suite supports bare-metal recovery media workflows that rebuild systems after storage-level failure. MiniTool ShadowMaker provides bootable recovery media for offline restores when Windows cannot start.
Match restore scope speed and automation requirements to the admin model
Start with how recovery scope is selected and validated, because catalog-driven browse determines whether admins can restore the right set of objects under pressure. Then align automation and governance expectations to the tool’s control plane, since some platforms emphasize guided recovery workflows and centralized catalog usage while others expose API-driven orchestration and reporting integration.
Verify granular restore workflows match real recovery questions
If the recovery question is “restore only selected items from a backup history,” prioritize BackupAssist Recovery Assistant workflows or BDRSuite restore-point catalog item selection. If the recovery question is “browse and restore across many servers with indexed targeting,” focus on NovaStor NovaBACKUP catalog indexing and NovaBACKUP’s indexed browsing.
Confirm Windows application consistency behavior for active workloads
If the environment includes active Windows server workloads that must be application-consistent, check for VSS-aware backup orchestration as seen in BackupAssist or VSS integration as seen in AOMEI Backupper Server. If the workload fit depends on restore troubleshooting and object-level restore options on an appliance, evaluate Datto SIRIS’s recovery-oriented workflow depth.
Pick the admin control plane that fits governance and scale
If centralized policy management across servers and consistent retention enforcement matter, compare BackupAssist central policy management with Bacula Enterprise policy-driven jobs tied to a central catalog. If job configuration discipline and tuning are acceptable in exchange for catalog-governed restores, Bacula Enterprise fits better than GUI-limited appliance approaches.
Choose the automation path based on integration needs
If backup operations must integrate into existing automation and reporting systems, select Nakivo Backup & Replication because it includes a built-in management API for job orchestration and monitoring state. If automation is mostly operator-led and the priority is scheduled backups plus restore media creation, evaluate AOMEI Backupper Server or MiniTool ShadowMaker.
Account for bare-metal recovery expectations during failure modes
If the failure mode includes rebuilding systems after storage-level failure, Hasleo Backup Suite’s bare-metal recovery media workflows are a closer match. If the failure mode includes Windows not starting and the team needs offline recovery media, MiniTool ShadowMaker’s bootable recovery media focus aligns better.
Who benefits from catalog-driven restore and Windows-consistent backup orchestration
Catalog-driven restore selection reduces time spent during recovery triage, which matters for Windows server teams that frequently recover specific objects rather than full system images. Teams also benefit from aligning VSS-aware behavior to their workload types so backup and restore testing reflects how real restores will behave under application-consistent expectations.
Windows server teams with many protected machines and frequent partial restores
BackupAssist supports catalog-driven granular restore decisions through Recovery Assistant workflows. NovaStor NovaBACKUP also emphasizes backup catalog indexing to reduce re-scan time and improve target selection.
IT teams that prioritize admin governance and retention mapped to backup history
Bacula Enterprise uses a central backup catalog to drive retention enforcement across scheduled jobs. BackupAssist offers centralized multi-server policy management that keeps protected workload settings aligned.
Microsoft-centric teams that require automation integration for backup operations
Nakivo Backup & Replication provides a built-in management API for orchestrating backup jobs and monitoring state. This reduces manual step variance compared with tools that rely on task configuration rather than external API orchestration.
Environments where bare-metal restore media is part of the recovery plan
Hasleo Backup Suite pairs a backup catalog with bare-metal recovery media workflows for system rebuild scenarios. MiniTool ShadowMaker focuses on bootable recovery media for offline restores when Windows cannot start.
Organizations that want appliance-style backup and guided restore testing workflows
Datto SIRIS uses an appliance-centric recovery workflow with object-level restore options and built-in offsite replication. This reduces manual disaster recovery steps when offsite recovery is part of standard practice.
Common failure points when selecting Ms Backup Software for Windows workloads
Mistakes usually come from assuming that any catalog equals fast recovery, or assuming that Windows application consistency is automatic without checking the tool’s VSS-aware orchestration path. Admin teams also misjudge automation depth, because some products support external API orchestration while others keep control inside the console and recovery workflow screens.
Selecting on image backup coverage but ignoring granular restore ergonomics
BackupAssist and NovaStor NovaBACKUP both lean on backup catalog indexing to narrow recovery scope quickly. BDRSuite also targets granular selection through a restore-point catalog, so confirm the specific restore question is supported before rollout.
Assuming application consistency without validating VSS-aware behavior for active workloads
BackupAssist emphasizes VSS-aware backup orchestration for application consistency. AOMEI Backupper Server provides VSS integration for application-consistent snapshots, so workload testing should verify restore expectations against those VSS paths.
Underestimating how much governance discipline is required for cross-tenant or large-scale admin control
Nakivo Backup & Replication requires careful RBAC setup for cross-tenant governance. Bacula Enterprise also demands operational setup and tuning discipline because retention enforcement and policy-driven jobs depend on configuration discipline.
Picking the wrong automation model for existing IT operations tooling
Nakivo Backup & Replication includes a built-in management API for orchestrating backup jobs and monitoring state. MiniTool ShadowMaker has limited enterprise automation surface and weaker audit logging controls, which can conflict with automation-first environments.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated BackupAssist, NovaStor NovaBACKUP, BDRSuite, Datto SIRIS, AOMEI Backupper Server, Nakivo Backup & Replication, Bacula Enterprise, Hasleo Backup Suite, Kopia, and MiniTool ShadowMaker with features weighted at 40% and ease plus value each weighted at 30%. Features emphasized catalog indexing and restore selection speed, Windows application consistency mechanisms built around VSS-aware behavior, and how the admin layer supports retention enforcement and recovery workflows. Ease captured how quickly admins can reach a valid granular restore decision using the backup catalog rather than repeating repository scans.
Value captured how restore operations and governance controls reduce recovery friction for Windows server workloads. BackupAssist ranked highest because its Recovery Assistant workflows use backup catalog data to guide granular restore decisions while also providing VSS-aware backup orchestration for Windows application consistency.
Frequently Asked Questions About Ms Backup Software
How do BackupAssist and NovaBACKUP differ in restore indexing and catalog-driven recovery workflows?
Which tools provide VSS-aware snapshot behavior for application-consistent Windows backups?
How does SIRIS handle restore testing for VMware and Hyper-V compared with agent-based Windows restores?
What tradeoff appears when choosing image-level backup tools like Hasleo Backup Suite versus catalog-driven granular selection tools?
When does bare-metal recovery matter most, and which tools cover it in practical workflows?
Which products offer a management API for automation and monitoring integrations?
How do admins apply retention governance and auditing in BackupAssist versus BDRSuite?
Where does Kopia’s deduplication model fall short for teams that need synthetic full backup indexing?
How should teams plan multi-server governance when comparing Bacula Enterprise with BackupAssist central management?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
- Technology Digital MediaTop 10 Best Backup Manager Software of 2026
- Technology Digital MediaTop 10 Best Backup Disaster Recovery Software of 2026
- Technology Digital MediaTop 10 Best Disk Image Backup Software of 2026
- Technology Digital MediaTop 10 Best Block Level Backup Software of 2026
- Technology Digital MediaTop 10 Best Home Network Backup Software of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Technology Digital Media alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of technology digital media tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare technology digital media tools→