GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Music And AudioTop 10 Best Live Audio Mixing Software of 2026
Ranked roundup of live audio mixing software for broadcast, streaming, and venues, comparing vMix, Mixxx, Voicemeeter, plus OBS Studio.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Ecamm Live is the best fit for a single Mac operator who needs quick scene-driven mixing for interviews and multitrack recording, while vMix works better when one Windows operator must handle live switching plus reliable recording and audio control.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Ecamm Live
Multitrack recording exports separate audio tracks while scene and live monitoring stay synchronized.
Built for fits when a single operator needs fast scene-driven mixing for interviews and multitrack recording..
OBS Studio
Editor pickMultitrack recording writes separate audio tracks while keeping the live mix coherent across scenes.
Built for fits when scene-based live capture needs consistent mixes for broadcast and post-stem editing..
Streamer.bot
Editor pickUse-case-ready trigger logic that combines MIDI and OSC events into conditional, state-aware cue automation.
Built for fits when show control needs deterministic routing between mixer apps via MIDI and OSC..
Comparison Table
Ecamm Live
creatorMac live streaming software with scene control, audio levels, guest audio, and live production tools.
Multitrack recording exports separate audio tracks while scene and live monitoring stay synchronized.
Ecamm Live is built around a live production timeline of sources and scenes, which makes it practical for talk shows, podcast recordings with video, and remote guest interviews. Audio mixing is source-centric, with per-input level control and monitoring that stays tied to the active scene so changes are reflected immediately during recording or streaming. Multitrack recording lets separate audio files be produced for later editing while keeping a single operator workflow for switching video and audio together.
A tradeoff shows up when the workflow needs deep console-style routing such as complex aux sends and matrix bus layouts for separate monitor mixes. Ecamm Live fits when the operator needs tight turnaround from interview setup to publish output, especially when guests join remotely and the show requires frequent scene changes.
- +Scene switching keeps audio routing aligned to the active production state
- +Multitrack recording captures separate audio files alongside the live mix
- +Source-level controls cover typical talk and interview mixing needs
- +Remote guest workflows stay inside one operator interface
- –Advanced aux and matrix-style routing depth is limited versus dedicated mixers
- –Hardware console control surface style workflows are not a primary focus
podcast and video producers
Remote interview with multitrack capture
Faster editing with isolated stems
church and nonprofit broadcast teams
Live service with source mixing
More stable on-air levels
Show 1 more scenario
independent livestream hosts
Streaming with operator monitoring
Fewer missed routing changes
Active scene control ties monitoring and output to the same production state during shows.
Best for: Fits when a single operator needs fast scene-driven mixing for interviews and multitrack recording.
OBS Studio
creatorFree open source live streaming software with a real-time audio mixer, filters, and multichannel source control.
Multitrack recording writes separate audio tracks while keeping the live mix coherent across scenes.
Scene collections let OBS Studio store and recall audio source states such as mute, volume, and device selection per scene. Audio output routing works through mix tracks and bus-like mixing paths that feed recording and streaming outputs at the same time. Multitrack recording can write separate audio tracks that keep the main mix usable while preserving stems for later editing.
A key tradeoff is that OBS Studio audio workflows rely on a video-centric scene graph, so complex aux or matrix monitor setups can feel less direct than in dedicated live consoles. It fits best for stream studios, church capture rigs, and venue AV teams that need reliable scene switching with consistent downstream outputs.
- +Scene switching recalls audio mutes and levels reliably
- +Multitrack recording exports stems for later mix and edit
- +Extensible audio processing and capture via plugins and scripts
- +Supports tight A/V alignment for broadcast and streamed events
- –Aux and monitor routing depth is weaker than dedicated consoles
- –Advanced workflows often require manual configuration
- –Audio metering and control granularity can lag live-mix expectations
Broadcast audio teams
Run audio alongside scene changes
Fewer mix misses between takes
Streaming studios
Record stems for later editing
Faster post production edits
Show 1 more scenario
Venue AV operators
Switch content during live events
Consistent output routing
Scene collections coordinate audio sources with the on-screen program feed.
Best for: Fits when scene-based live capture needs consistent mixes for broadcast and post-stem editing.
Streamer.bot
creatorLive automation software that integrates with streaming workflows and supports audio control actions during broadcasts.
Use-case-ready trigger logic that combines MIDI and OSC events into conditional, state-aware cue automation.
Streamer.bot is a control layer for live production workflows that can react to MIDI events, OSC messages, timers, and internal bot events. It then executes actions like sending messages out, calling local commands, or invoking functions exposed to its automation runtime. For mixing work, that means cueing gain changes, preset recalls, and transport-style actions in other apps through their control surfaces rather than doing all audio processing inside Streamer.bot.
A key tradeoff is that Streamer.bot does not replace a channel strip, bus routing engine, or multitrack recorder, so it requires a separate mixer or audio app to do the actual audio work. It fits well when a broadcast or venue needs reliable cue timing and consistent state transitions across multiple devices that already expose MIDI or OSC control endpoints.
- +Event-to-action automation graph for deterministic cue sequences
- +MIDI and OSC input handling for show control across devices
- +Command and message execution enables deep integration with other apps
- +Supports stateful logic for conditional audio or scene changes
- –No native channel strip or bus routing engine for audio mixing
- –Complex workflows need careful testing to avoid cue conflicts
- –Real-time responsiveness depends on external app control endpoints
- –Debugging multi-device triggers can be slower than in-audio editors
Independent streamers
Cue overlays and mixer presets together
Fewer missed transitions
Broadcast control teams
Maintain safe cross-app show logic
More reliable run-of-show
Show 2 more scenarios
Venue operators
Control multiple endpoints from one surface
One operator workflow
A single automation layer can map control commands to external mixing and playback systems.
Technical producers
Integrate custom control sequences
Custom cue behavior
Automation can dispatch commands and messages to tools that expose control interfaces.
Best for: Fits when show control needs deterministic routing between mixer apps via MIDI and OSC.
vMix
SMBWindows live production software with an integrated audio mixer for streams, recordings, and live events.
Snapshot recall of mixer state during live operation ties routing, effects, and sources into one repeatable show sequence.
vMix targets live audio and video control with a mixer-centric workflow that includes audio routing, monitoring, and automation on the same timeline. Multitrack recording, scene recall, and snapshot-style switching support broadcast-ready take management.
Hardware and software inputs are handled through device capture and ASIO audio support, which helps keep round-trip latency predictable for monitoring. Audio processing stays practical for venues by combining channel strip style effects with bus routing for FOH and monitor mixes.
- +Scene recall and snapshot-style changes support repeatable show flow
- +ASIO-based audio I O helps reduce monitoring latency variability
- +Multitrack recording supports post show mixing without re capture
- +Aux and matrix style routing supports flexible FOH and monitor builds
- –Automation needs careful rehearsal to avoid unintended scene transitions
- –Advanced routing and effects can feel dense for small setups
- –Extensibility depends more on built in modules than deep API control
- –DSP plugin hosting coverage is narrower than DAW style ecosystems
Best for: Fits when one operator must run live audio and switching with reliable scene recall and recording.
Mixxx
vertical specialistOpen source DJ software with live mixing, monitoring, and performance control for real-time audio sets.
MIDI controller mapping and recall-oriented performance workflow using Mixxx control bindings for repeatable live operation.
Mixxx performs live deck mixing with a full virtual mixer, synchronized playback, and cue-based performance controls. It supports multiple audio inputs and outputs, including typical venue workflows like monitor routing and recording.
Mixxx adds automation via MIDI control, mapping files, and show-style recall of parameters through its internal controller binding system. It also supports multitrack recording for set capture alongside the live mix output.
- +Deck syncing with beat grid control supports tight live timing
- +Configurable audio routing supports multiple outs for FOH and monitors
- +MIDI mapping enables custom controller layouts for performance workflows
- +Multitrack recording captures set stems while continuing live playback
- –Advanced bus constructs like deep matrix routing need careful configuration
- –Automation relies mainly on controller bindings rather than full show scenes
- –DSP plugin hosting support is limited compared with dedicated broadcast mixers
- –Latency tuning across hardware backends can require repeated testing
Best for: Fits when DJs need repeatable live mixing control plus routing and recording, without broadcast-grade scene recall.
MainStage
vertical specialistMac live performance software for processing, mixing, and managing audio instruments and inputs on stage.
Snapshot-like scene recall for complete patch states, including plugin parameters and routing, driven during performance via MIDI.
MainStage is an Apple macOS live performance environment built around instrument and effect racks for concert-scale audio routing. It supports DSP plugin hosting inside patch layouts, along with keyboard, MIDI, and show control triggering to drive channel strips and scene changes during a set.
The software is strongest when a Mac-based system already exists and operator workflows benefit from DAW-like editing plus performance-focused recall. For venue or broadcast mixing, it competes by turning plugins and routing into scripted performance states rather than replacing a dedicated broadcast mixer.
- +Scene recall swaps full patch configurations instantly for set-by-set transitions
- +Native Core Audio routing supports low-latency performance monitoring paths
- +MIDI show control can trigger patch changes without external mixing surfaces
- +Graphical channel strip workflow makes FOH and monitor operator edits repeatable
- –Limited governance features like RBAC and audit logs for multi-operator teams
- –Live mixing depth lags purpose-built broadcast mixers with advanced metering workflows
- –Hardware surface control support depends on MIDI mapping rather than native console integration
- –Complex routings can become hard to troubleshoot mid-show without preflight checks
Best for: Fits when performers need repeatable patch scenes with plugin-driven processing on macOS, with MIDI-triggered show flow.
RME TotalMix FX
hardware ecosystemA software mixer for RME interfaces with low-latency routing, submixes, effects, and monitor control.
TotalMix FX’s hardware-tied mixer graph lets DSP and routing changes apply directly through the RME signal path.
RME TotalMix FX differentiates itself by acting as an interface-matched digital mixer and DSP control layer for RME audio hardware.
It provides configurable channel strip routing, mix matrix control, and real-time DSP per input and output.
The workflow stays anchored to the hardware I/O topology, with monitoring, effects, and routing changes reflected immediately in the device signal path.
TotalMix FX also supports automation-like recall via saved settings across working sessions for stable show operation.
- +Hardware-synced routing makes monitoring changes reflect instantly at the I/O level
- +Per-channel DSP chain editing supports detailed sound shaping for FOH and monitors
- +Scene recall for consistent show states reduces manual reconfiguration risk
- +Matrix and aux style mixing layouts support complex multiroute monitor systems
- –Workflow depends on the connected RME interface topology, limiting cross-device flexibility
- –Large routing sessions can be hard to audit quickly without disciplined naming
Best for: Fits when venues use RME interfaces and need fast, repeatable routing and DSP control during shows.
Steinberg VST Live
vertical specialistA live performance application for audio playback, plugin processing, setlists, and show control.
VST Live scene recall drives plugin parameter states from performance triggers rather than manual mixer moves.
Steinberg VST Live focuses on live performance control by letting audio engineers route, automate, and trigger VST instruments and effects during a show. It uses the same VST ecosystem many studios already rely on, so session-ready plugins can be reused with show-oriented scene recall.
The core workflow centers on MIDI control, parameter automation, and scene switching for repeatable transitions onstage. It also supports audio connectivity patterns typical for small to mid-size rigs, including multitrack recording alignment with external production tools.
- +Scene recall workflow matches predictable show transitions and plugin parameter changes
- +VST plugin hosting supports reusing familiar effects and instruments from existing projects
- +MIDI show control style operation fits keyboard, controller, and click-driven performances
- +Audio output routing and monitoring are practical for FOH and monitor feeds in small setups
- –Built-in live mixing depth can lag DAW-centric or console-centric competitors
- –Scene building and template management require disciplined project organization
- –Extensibility depends on VST and Steinberg-style control integration rather than wide protocol coverage
- –Complex multi-device setups can demand more manual alignment than dedicated broadcast mixers
Best for: Fits when a performer or engineer needs VST-based scene switching tied to MIDI performance workflows.
PreSonus Universal Control
SMBA control and routing application for PreSonus interfaces and StudioLive digital mixers.
Universal Control provides a single configuration workflow for supported PreSonus hardware, including state recall for repeat show setups.
PreSonus Universal Control manages and configures PreSonus audio interfaces and mixers from one host computer using a consistent device control layer. It centralizes routing and device settings that would otherwise live in separate hardware panels, including signal path controls exposed by supported hardware.
The software also supports scene recall style workflows through device-side state handling, which reduces the need to re-tune settings between show runs. Universal Control fits venue setups where the physical console and audio I O hardware are primarily PreSonus, and where configuration time matters as much as mixing speed.
- +Centralized device configuration for supported PreSonus mixers and interfaces
- +Consistent control surfaces reduce mismatched setup across multiple units
- +Snapshot and scene style recall aligns with repeatable show workflows
- +Routing changes are applied through the same control workflow
- –Limited to supported PreSonus hardware paths and exposed parameters
- –Advanced venue workflows depend on external tools for mixing automation
- –Complex routing can require careful attention to device signal flow
- –MIDI and OSC coverage is constrained by what the attached hardware exposes
Best for: Fits when a venue relies on PreSonus hardware and needs fast, repeatable device setup control.
Allen & Heath Director
enterpriseA computer-based editor and control application for Allen & Heath dLive systems.
Scene recall workflow that mirrors console show-state concepts for fast operator handoffs.
Allen & Heath Director is a live mixing control application aimed at teams running Allen & Heath hardware in venues and broadcast workflows. It focuses on channel strip control, aux and matrix mix routing, and scene recall so operators can standardize show states across rehearsals and repeats.
The workflow is centered on networked control of the mixing surface, including multi-user operation for show staff. Director is most distinct for how tightly its control model maps to Allen & Heath console concepts instead of presenting a generic software mixer layout.
- +Console-aligned channel strip and routing controls reduce translation errors
- +Scene recall supports repeatable show states across operators
- +Multi-user control supports coordinated FOH and production workflows
- +Network control fits venue deployments without relying on a DAW session
- –Control depth is tied to compatible Allen & Heath mixing hardware
- –Setup requires careful network and permissions planning for multiple operators
- –Advanced workflows depend on features available on the connected console
- –On-screen layout prioritizes control mapping over broad virtual mixing patching
Best for: Fits when broadcast or venue teams need operator control and scene recall tied to Allen & Heath consoles.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 music and audio, Ecamm Live stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right live audio mixing software
Live audio mixing software is judged by how reliably it turns show intent into repeatable routing, level control, and recorded outputs under time pressure. This guide covers Ecamm Live, OBS Studio, Streamer.bot, vMix, Mixxx, MainStage, RME TotalMix FX, Steinberg VST Live, PreSonus Universal Control, and Allen & Heath Director.
The lineup favors tools that align scene recall with multitrack recording workflows, or tools that separate show control automation from audio mixing. Ecamm Live leads with scene switching that keeps audio routing aligned to the active production state while multitrack recording exports separate audio tracks in sync.
Live audio mixing software for show-state switching, routing control, and recording
Live audio mixing software coordinates input processing, routing, and monitoring during a live session while supporting scene or state changes that an operator can trigger on demand. In Ecamm Live, scene switching is designed to keep audio routing aligned to the active production state and multitrack recording captures separate audio files while the live mix remains synchronized.
In vMix, snapshot recall groups routing, effects, and sources into repeatable show sequences, and ASIO-based audio I O targets more consistent monitoring latency behavior. Tools like OBS Studio follow a scene-driven approach with multitrack recording that exports stems for later edit, while Streamer.bot focuses on deterministic event-to-action automation using MIDI and OSC and does not include a native audio channel strip or bus routing engine.
Show-state recall and recording coherence
Live audio mixing software earns its place when show intent maps to repeatable routing, levels, and outputs without last-minute cleanup. This guide emphasizes scene or snapshot recall tied to monitoring and recording so the operator can trust what hits FOH and what gets exported for post.
Scene-driven switching that stays aligned to the active mix
Ecamm Live ties scene switching to audio routing so routing and levels match the currently active production state. vMix groups routing, effects, and sources into snapshot recall sequences for repeatable show flow.
Multitrack exports that preserve stems and synchronization
Ecamm Live exports separate audio tracks while keeping scene and live monitoring synchronized. OBS Studio writes separate audio tracks so mixes stay coherent across scenes for broadcast and post-stem editing.
Deterministic cue automation via MIDI and OSC
Streamer.bot builds an event-to-action automation graph that combines MIDI and OSC inputs into conditional, state-aware cues. This approach targets show control needs where deterministic routing triggers across apps matter more than a native audio mixing engine.
Hardware-tied routing and DSP control through an interface-centric mixer graph
RME TotalMix FX applies routing and DSP changes through the RME signal path so monitoring reflects changes at the I/O level. PreSonus Universal Control centralizes supported PreSonus device configuration so repeat show setup can be reproduced from one workflow.
Performer-centric patch recall with plugin parameter state
MainStage uses snapshot-like scene recall to swap full patch configurations, including plugin parameters, via MIDI-driven show flow. Steinberg VST Live recalls VST plugin parameter states from performance triggers so effects and instruments change together with MIDI performance.
Controller-driven performance workflow with practical multi-output routing
Mixxx pairs MIDI controller mapping with repeatable live mixing behavior using Mixxx control bindings. It also supports configurable audio routing for multiple outputs used for FOH and monitor mixes.
Choose based on whether mixing and show control must be coupled or separated
The main decision is whether cue automation must drive the mixer and recording in one system or whether show control can sit outside the audio path. Ecamm Live and vMix keep routing, effects, and recordings tied to scene and snapshot state, while Streamer.bot prioritizes deterministic MIDI and OSC cue logic without a native audio channel strip and bus routing engine.
Pick coupled show-state control if scenes must govern audio routing and exports
Choose Ecamm Live when scene switching must keep audio routing aligned to the active production state while multitrack recording exports separate audio tracks in sync. Choose vMix when snapshot recall must group routing, effects, and sources into one repeatable show sequence for operator handoffs.
Pick split show control when deterministic MIDI and OSC triggers matter more than mixing depth
Choose Streamer.bot when show control requires conditional, state-aware cue automation using MIDI and OSC events into deterministic event-to-action sequences. Accept that Streamer.bot lacks a native channel strip or bus routing engine, so audio mixing still needs another tool.
Choose performer-oriented patch scenes when routing is secondary to plugin state recall
Choose MainStage when complete patch states must swap instantly, including plugin parameters, driven by MIDI-triggered scene recall. Choose Steinberg VST Live when VST plugin parameter states must follow performance triggers without manual mixer moves.
Choose interface-centric routing when the venue standardizes on a specific hardware ecosystem
Choose RME TotalMix FX when the venue uses RME interfaces and needs DSP and routing changes that apply directly through the RME signal path. Choose PreSonus Universal Control when the venue relies on supported PreSonus hardware and needs a single configuration workflow that includes repeat show state recall.
Choose console-aligned scene recall when operators must match an existing workflow model
Choose Allen & Heath Director when teams need scene recall that mirrors console show-state concepts for faster operator handoffs. Plan for hardware coupling because control depth is tied to compatible Allen & Heath mixing hardware and requires network and permissions planning for multiple operators.
Choose controller-first live performance when repeatability comes from bindings and deck timing
Choose Mixxx when repeatable live mixing control is driven by MIDI controller mapping and Mixxx control bindings, especially for deck timing with beat grid control. Treat advanced matrix-style routing depth as a careful configuration task rather than a default workflow.
Who benefits from these live audio mixing software designs
Different designs fit different operators. Broadcast and recording workflows lean toward scene recall that stays coherent with multitrack outputs, while venue routing control often fits hardware-tied mixer graphs. Show control teams may prefer deterministic MIDI and OSC automation that triggers other mixer apps.
Single-operator broadcast and streaming setups that need reliable scene-based switching plus multitrack capture
Ecamm Live supports scene switching that keeps routing aligned to the active production state while multitrack recording exports separate audio tracks synchronized to the live mix.
Teams that run repeatable show sequences and want snapshot recall to coordinate sources, routing, and effects
vMix snapshot recall ties routing, effects, and sources into one repeatable show sequence, which matches workflows where rehearsal validates scene-to-scene transitions.
Show control engineers who need deterministic cross-app cue logic using MIDI and OSC inputs
Streamer.bot uses an automation graph to combine MIDI and OSC events into conditional, state-aware cue sequences, even though it does not provide an audio mixing engine.
Mac-based performers who need fast patch or plugin-state scenes triggered during live sets
MainStage and Steinberg VST Live both focus on snapshot-like or VST parameter recall driven by MIDI performance triggers for set-by-set transitions.
Venues standardizing on a specific interface or console ecosystem
RME TotalMix FX fits RME interface-centric venues because routing and DSP changes apply directly through the RME signal path, while Allen & Heath Director fits teams using compatible Allen & Heath consoles and show-state handoffs.
Common pitfalls when selecting live audio mixing software
The most common failures come from confusing show control automation with audio mixing depth, or from assuming that scene recall exists in the same form across products. Another frequent issue is building a complex routing plan without testing rehearsal, since automation can trigger unintended transitions when state changes are not fully rehearsed.
Assuming a show control tool also provides a full audio routing and channel strip engine
Streamer.bot focuses on deterministic MIDI and OSC cue automation and does not include a native audio channel strip or bus routing engine. Audio routing and monitoring still need an audio-capable mixing application.
Designing scene transitions without rehearsal because snapshot recall can trigger unintended state changes
vMix supports snapshot recall and scene-style changes that can repeat reliably, but automation requires careful rehearsal to avoid unintended scene transitions. Test cue ordering and trigger conditions before a live run.
Overbuilding routing using advanced matrix constructs without planning for configuration complexity
Mixxx supports configurable audio routing, but advanced bus constructs like deep matrix routing need careful configuration. Keep matrix depth minimal until the team verifies signal flow.
Planning multi-operator workflows without governance planning when scene recall depends on compatible devices
Allen & Heath Director ties control depth to compatible Allen & Heath mixing hardware and requires careful network and permissions planning for multiple operators. Confirm multi-operator access behavior before relying on shared scene workflows.
Relying on deep routing features when the product is primarily built for patch scenes or post-stem recording
MainStage and Steinberg VST Live prioritize scene or patch recall for plugin and performance parameter states rather than broadcast-grade advanced routing workflows. Pair these tools with an audio routing plan that matches the venue’s monitoring and aux needs.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated live audio mixing software on show-state recall reliability, multitrack recording coherence, and how consistently scenes keep routing and monitoring aligned to exported outputs. Features accounted for 40% of the score, ease and value each accounted for 30% of the score, and tie-breakers favored workflows where rehearsal translates directly into repeatable transitions.
Ecamm Live led the ranking because scene switching kept audio routing aligned to the active production state while multitrack recording exports separate audio tracks synchronized with live monitoring. vMix ranked next for snapshot recall workflows and ASIO-based audio I O aimed at more consistent monitoring latency behavior during live operation.
Frequently Asked Questions About live audio mixing software
How does multitrack recording differ between vMix and OBS Studio during scene changes?
Which tool provides the most deterministic cue automation between audio and control events using MIDI and OSC?
How do ASIO-based workflows affect monitoring latency in vMix compared with Ecamm Live on macOS?
What breaks if a live show requires scene recall tied to an external console concept rather than a generic software mixer layout?
When does hardware-tied DSP control matter more than patch-based plugin hosting in MainStage?
How does data migration or repeat-show setup differ between RME TotalMix FX and PreSonus Universal Control?
Which option handles plugin scene recall natively through VST parameter states during performance control?
What is the key tradeoff when choosing a DJ-focused mixer workflow in Mixxx versus broadcast-style scene control in vMix?
How do operator access and multi-user control differ between Allen & Heath Director and single-operator scene tools like Ecamm Live?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Music And Audio alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of music and audio tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare music and audio tools→