
GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Market ResearchTop 10 Best Keyword Research Search Software of 2026
Ranked roundup of keyword research search software for SEO teams, comparing Ahrefs, Semrush, Moz Pro, and others by features and tradeoffs.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Wordtracker is the best pick for SEO teams that want intent-aware keyword grouping plus SERP context to move from discovery to content planning, whereas Semrush Keyword Magic Tool fits when you need repeatable seed-to-cluster lists for larger workflow scale.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Wordtracker
SERP feature analysis per keyword highlights result composition to guide intent-aligned content briefs.
Built for fits when SEO teams want intent-aware keyword grouping plus SERP context..
Semrush Keyword Magic Tool
Editor pickKeyword clustering turns a single seed into organized theme buckets with consistent metric-driven filtering.
Built for fits when SEO teams need repeatable seed-to-cluster keyword lists for content planning workflows..
Ahrefs Keywords Explorer
Editor pickSERP feature analysis links query intent with result layout patterns on the Keywords Explorer SERP view.
Built for fits when SEO teams plan topic clusters using Ahrefs domain context and SERP feature signals..
Comparison Table
Wordtracker
SMBKeyword research software for search term discovery, competition review, and niche selection.
SERP feature analysis per keyword highlights result composition to guide intent-aligned content briefs.
Wordtracker is built around keyword research workflows that start with seed expansion and continue through keyword clustering for content planning. The tool’s SERP view helps teams validate whether results are dominated by specific result types and search intents. Wordtracker also tracks performance over time to connect planning decisions to keyword SERP position changes.
A practical tradeoff is that Wordtracker’s depth in enterprise-grade governance and automation is thinner than the heaviest competitors in this category. It fits well when SEO teams need faster iteration on topic groups and intent qualifiers, then want ongoing monitoring without stitching together multiple keyword sources.
- +Keyword clustering organizes targets into actionable topic groups
- +SERP feature analysis clarifies result types before content creation
- +Rank tracking integration links keyword decisions to movement
- +Intent-focused filtering reduces irrelevant expansions
- –Automation and API surface lag behind the strongest competitors
- –Keyword dataset coverage can feel narrower for some niche verticals
SEO managers
Build topic clusters from seeds
More coherent content mapping
Content strategists
Audit SERP feature occupancy
Higher likelihood of match
Show 1 more scenario
Digital marketers
Monitor keyword SERP position changes
Faster iteration cycles
Track selected terms over time to judge whether updates are shifting rankings.
Best for: Fits when SEO teams want intent-aware keyword grouping plus SERP context.
Semrush Keyword Magic Tool
enterpriseKeyword research platform with large-scale term generation, clustering, intent signals, and SERP data.
Keyword clustering turns a single seed into organized theme buckets with consistent metric-driven filtering.
Keyword Magic Tool handles large scale keyword discovery by turning a seed keyword into many related queries with grouped keyword taxonomy. It includes keyword difficulty scoring, search volume ranges, and filters that narrow by intent and SERP relevance before exporting to downstream planning.
The main tradeoff is list quality versus control because SERP feature interpretation and on-page prioritization require additional Semrush modules beyond keyword generation. It fits best when an SEO manager needs repeatable expansion runs for multiple themes and wants to reuse the results across content briefs and gap audits.
- +Seed expansion generates large long-tail sets quickly
- +Keyword clustering groups related terms for theme building
- +Filtering by intent speeds focused planning
- +Exports support handoff to content and optimization workflows
- –Clustering can feel opaque without manual curation
- –Deep SERP feature interpretation needs separate Semrush tools
SEO managers
Plan content around keyword clusters
More consistent topic mapping
Content strategists
Shortlist intent-matched long-tail terms
Better search intent fit
Show 1 more scenario
Agency SEO teams
Generate briefs for multiple clients
Faster brief turnaround
Repeatable expansion runs support fast generation of term sets per client theme.
Best for: Fits when SEO teams need repeatable seed-to-cluster keyword lists for content planning workflows.
Ahrefs Keywords Explorer
SMBKeyword research suite with large search databases, SERP analysis, and keyword difficulty scoring.
SERP feature analysis links query intent with result layout patterns on the Keywords Explorer SERP view.
Ahrefs Keywords Explorer centers on turning a seed keyword into an actionable list with search demand signals, SERP feature views, and intent labels. Keyword clustering helps keep research organized when building topic maps or briefs for multiple pages. SERP analysis pages show what result types dominate a query, which reduces guesswork when mapping content to user intent.
A tradeoff appears in how SERP-oriented outputs can demand disciplined keyword grouping to avoid mixed-intent clusters. It fits best when SEO teams already use Ahrefs for competitive research and want keyword discovery to stay consistent with the same competitor set used in link gap and content planning.
- +SERP feature views make intent mapping more concrete during planning
- +Keyword clustering reduces sorting time for topic-based content backlogs
- +Seed expansion workflows quickly broaden query lists from one starting term
- +Competitive context stays consistent with Ahrefs domain research workflows
- –Keyword clusters can mix intents without strict inclusion rules
- –Some SERP snapshots can lag behind fast-moving query trends
- –Export and reporting workflows take extra steps for multi-step analysis
- –Usable results depend on consistent seed selection and negative filtering
SEO managers
Briefs built from SERP layout
Fewer brief revisions after publishing
Content strategists
Topic clustering from seed expansion
Cleaner editorial calendars
Show 2 more scenarios
Technical SEO analysts
Content gap audits by query families
Prioritized pages to build
Compare keyword families against competitors and identify which SERP patterns are missing.
Agency SEO teams
Client research with shared competitor set
More consistent deliverables
Use one Ahrefs competitor context to standardize how keyword lists are produced across clients.
Best for: Fits when SEO teams plan topic clusters using Ahrefs domain context and SERP feature signals.
Moz Keyword Explorer
SMBKeyword research tool focused on suggestions, priority scoring, and SERP analysis.
Keyword cannibalization detection highlights overlap between a planned target and existing ranking pages.
Moz Keyword Explorer pairs keyword search volume metrics with a keyword difficulty score and SERP feature analysis inside a single workflow. It emphasizes seed keyword expansion, then groups findings using topic-style keyword grouping for faster content planning.
The SERP side supports ongoing checks for ranking changes tied to specific queries, which helps teams react to SERP volatility. Moz Keyword Explorer also includes keyword cannibalization detection signals by surfacing overlap patterns between target pages and related terms.
- +Seed keyword expansion shows related queries without leaving the core workflow
- +Keyword difficulty score is paired with SERP feature occupancy context
- +Keyword cannibalization detection flags overlapping targets across related terms
- +Keyword clustering groups findings by topic-like sets for planning
- –Autocomplete suggestion mining coverage can lag behind larger engines for some niches
- –SERP competitor overlap views require extra steps to map insights to pages
- –Long-tail discovery depth can feel limited compared with tools that mine more sources
- –Requires careful keyword grouping taxonomy to prevent mixed intent clusters
Best for: Fits when SEO teams want difficulty and SERP feature context alongside clustering for content planning.
SE Ranking Keyword Research
SMBSEO platform with keyword suggestion, search volume, difficulty, and competitor keyword data.
Keyword clustering builds topic groupings directly from expansions so content gap audits start with ready-made sets.
SE Ranking Keyword Research turns a seed keyword list into expanded keyword sets with SERP-level context for SEO planning. It generates search demand signals and keyword difficulty score estimates, then groups results to support content brief creation and content gap audits.
Workflows include keyword clustering and SERP feature analysis so pages can be matched to search intent rather than only ranked by difficulty. The tool also supports automation via exports and integrations that help keep rank tracking and keyword planning in sync.
- +Keyword clustering groups related queries into plan-ready topics
- +SERP feature analysis helps map intent to page formatting needs
- +Keyword difficulty score estimates speed triage for large backlogs
- +Automation-ready exports help move data into content workflows
- –SERP scraping depth can lag for highly volatile query sets
- –Some intent labels need manual review for borderline cases
Best for: Fits when SEO teams need clustered keyword planning with SERP context, plus exports for downstream workflows.
Mangools KWFinder
SMBKeyword research software with long-tail discovery, difficulty estimates, and SERP overview.
Built-in SERP feature analysis is presented per keyword so teams can screen intent and SERP volatility before writing.
Mangools KWFinder focuses on keyword research workflows for SEO teams who need fast keyword discovery and practical SERP context. It generates keyword lists from seed queries and supports SERP feature analysis to help filter terms by intent and competition signals.
Users can export results for reporting and use grouping features to organize keyword targets for content planning. The interface emphasizes guided exploration around keyword difficulty score and long-tail keyword discovery rather than enterprise-scale automation.
- +Quick keyword discovery from seed terms with clean result tables
- +SERP feature analysis helps validate intent before committing to content
- +Export-friendly outputs for spreadsheets and editorial handoffs
- +Keyword grouping keeps large lists organized for topic planning
- –Limited integration depth for rank tracking integration versus enterprise suites
- –Automation and API surface are minimal for multi-account SEO operations
- –Keyword cannibalization detection requires external workflow support
- –SERP scraping depth is narrower than tools built for heavy competitor mining
Best for: Fits when SEO teams need rapid keyword research and SERP context without heavy automation requirements.
LowFruits
niche SEOKeyword research tool that identifies low-competition opportunities by analyzing SERP weakness.
SERP volatility index with SERP feature occupancy context tied to keyword targets.
LowFruits focuses on keyword discovery for SEO teams and emphasizes SERP feature context and SERP volatility rather than only keyword lists. The workflow centers on generating keyword targets from seed queries, expanding clusters, and surfacing intent and difficulty signals for prioritization.
It also supports SERP scraping for on-page evaluation cues and tracks keyword SERP position to support ongoing optimization decisions. Automation and API access matter for teams that want repeatable research runs and consistent exports across projects.
- +SERP volatility signals help anticipate ranking swings during planning
- +Keyword clustering groups related targets to reduce research duplication
- +SERP feature analysis supports faster intent and result-type judgments
- +Keyword SERP position tracking supports ongoing optimization feedback
- –SERP scraping coverage can be uneven for niche result layouts
- –Automation depth depends on an API-first workflow to scale research runs
- –Keyword cannibalization detection needs more manual review than expected
- –Some SERP interpretation outputs require established team conventions
Best for: Fits when SEO teams need clustered long-tail research with SERP feature context and position tracking.
SECockpit
niche SEOKeyword research application focused on long-tail keyword filtering and competition analysis.
Keyword relevance scoring with built-in grouping makes large research sets easier to triage into content plans.
SECockpit focuses on keyword research workflows for SEO teams that need structured keyword data and repeatable expansion. It supports long-tail keyword discovery with filters, scoring, and grouping for faster content planning.
The tool also provides SERP and competitor visibility signals used for content gap and keyword prioritization. Automation is driven through import and export workflows plus integrations for rank tracking and monitoring keyword performance.
- +Keyword grouping and filtering reduces time spent organizing research lists
- +SERP and competitor signals support prioritization for content gap audits
- +Seed expansion and long-tail discovery workflows support ongoing research cycles
- +Export and integration workflows support downstream rank tracking routines
- –Workflow depth can require careful configuration to match team standards
- –Advanced SERP analytics can feel narrower than all-in-one suites
Best for: Fits when SEO teams need structured keyword expansion, clustering, and SERP-guided prioritization without heavy tooling overlap.
Serpstat Keyword Research
SMBSearch marketing platform with keyword research, clustering, and competitor domain analysis.
Domain-to-keyword gap analysis highlights missing ranking opportunities using SERP overlap against competitor domains.
Serpstat Keyword Research expands seed keyword lists and attaches search volume metrics and keyword difficulty score for prioritization.
SERP feature analysis and intent-oriented views connect keyword selection to real results pages instead of relying on keyword text alone.
Competitor comparisons support content gap analysis by mapping which keywords competitors appear to cover that a target domain lacks.
Exportable outputs help teams maintain repeatable keyword targeting, then bring the results into ongoing rank tracking integration.
- +Keyword clustering reduces manual grouping for long-tail keyword discovery
- +SERP feature analysis ties intent signals to keyword prioritization
- +Content gap comparisons reveal missing coverage versus competitor domains
- +Exports support repeatable workflows for keyword targeting and auditing
- –SERP volatility index views are harder to operationalize for daily monitoring
- –Some SERP analysis outputs require more manual reconciliation across keyword sets
Best for: Fits when SEO teams need fast keyword expansion with SERP intent signals and competitor gap comparisons.
QuestionDB
content SEOKeyword and topic research tool focused on question-based search queries for content planning.
Question-to-keyword generation centered on extracting ask-style queries for intent-driven content planning.
QuestionDB targets SEO teams that need question-led keyword research and search-queries mining beyond standard seed expansion. It generates keyword candidates from query themes and surfaces intent signals tied to what people ask, then groups findings to support content planning.
The workflow centers on extracting, clustering, and exporting keyword lists for downstream SERP review and rank tracking setup. QuestionDB also provides an automation-friendly interface that fits repeated research cycles for site refreshes and ongoing topic coverage.
- +Question-focused mining produces keyword ideas tied to common user asks
- +Keyword grouping helps convert query sets into publishable content clusters
- +Export-ready lists support handoff to SERP audits and rank tracking workflows
- +Automation-oriented workflow supports repeated topic research cycles
- –Less coverage for deep SERP competitor overlap analysis than mainstream suites
- –Keyword difficulty scoring depth can feel limited for technical SEO triage
- –SERP volatility tracking is not a first-class workflow outcome
- –Requires careful seed selection to avoid noisy question variations
Best for: Fits when SEO teams need question-based keyword discovery for content briefs and topic clusters without a heavier SERP suite.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 market research, Wordtracker stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right keyword research search software
Keyword research search software helps SEO teams turn seed queries into structured keyword sets, validate SERP intent, and prioritize content targets with repeatable workflows. This buyer’s guide compares Wordtracker, Semrush Keyword Magic Tool, Ahrefs Keywords Explorer, Moz Keyword Explorer, and seven additional tools built for clustering, SERP feature context, and gap-driven planning.
The selection criteria focus on integration depth into downstream rank tracking and analytics workflows, the clarity of each product’s data model through visible exports and grouping behavior, and the automation and API surface for scaling research runs. The tools covered also differ in how they operationalize SERP feature analysis, keyword clustering boundaries, and niche SERP coverage for day-to-day keyword gap audits.
Keyword research search software for SEO teams that cluster targets and interpret SERP intent
Keyword research search software is a workflow layer that expands seed keywords into long-tail lists, groups related terms into topic clusters, and ties those groups to SERP feature signals for intent-aligned planning. Tools such as Semrush Keyword Magic Tool and Ahrefs Keywords Explorer organize keyword discovery around clustering, then use SERP feature analysis in their interfaces to inform how content should match result layout patterns.
A key differentiator is how tools convert raw keyword expansion into actionable research outputs like cluster-ready exports and planning lists. Wordtracker emphasizes SERP feature analysis per keyword to highlight result composition before writing, while Moz Keyword Explorer adds keyword cannibalization detection that maps overlap between planned targets and existing ranking pages.
Workflow outputs and controls for clustering, SERP intent, and gap audits
Keyword research software only becomes actionable when it produces research outputs that teams can export into planning and writing workflows. These features decide whether teams end up with cluster-ready keyword sets, intent signals anchored to SERP layout, and gap findings that map back to existing pages.
SERP feature analysis tied to each keyword target
Wordtracker uses SERP feature analysis per keyword to highlight result composition that guides intent-aligned briefs. Mangools KWFinder also shows SERP feature analysis per keyword to help screen intent and SERP volatility before writing.
Clustering that converts seed expansion into topic groupings
Semrush Keyword Magic Tool turns a single seed into theme buckets with metric-driven filtering during keyword clustering. SE Ranking Keyword Research builds topic groupings directly from expansions so content gap audits start with plan-ready sets.
Planning-aware SERP context inside the keyword explorer
Ahrefs Keywords Explorer links query intent with result layout patterns on the Keywords Explorer SERP view. LowFruits adds SERP volatility index signals with SERP feature occupancy context tied to keyword targets.
Gap detection using overlap with existing ranking surfaces
Moz Keyword Explorer focuses on keyword cannibalization detection to surface overlap between a planned target and existing ranking pages. Serpstat Keyword Research uses domain-to-keyword gap analysis to highlight missing ranking opportunities through SERP overlap against competitor domains.
Governable prioritization using built-in scoring and triage
SECockpit applies keyword relevance scoring with built-in grouping to reduce time spent organizing large research lists. QuestionDB centers question-to-keyword generation for ask-style content planning and then groups the resulting sets into clusters.
Choose by automation depth, SERP interpretation workflow, and scaling needs
The fastest way to pick the right tool is to match the product workflow to the team’s operating cadence for keyword research and content planning. Teams that scale across many projects need automation and an API surface that keeps research runs consistent, while teams that plan fewer campaigns can prioritize interface clarity for SERP context and clustering boundaries.
Align the SERP intent workflow with how writing briefs get created
If briefs require intent signals rooted in result composition per keyword, Wordtracker’s SERP feature analysis highlights what appears on the SERP for each target. If briefs require quick screening with less emphasis on enterprise integrations, Mangools KWFinder presents built-in SERP feature analysis in a keyword-by-keyword view.
Pick clustering behavior based on whether topic buckets must be repeatable
Choose Semrush Keyword Magic Tool when the workflow depends on repeatable seed-to-cluster lists using consistent metric-driven filtering. Choose SE Ranking Keyword Research when the workflow needs topic groupings built directly from expansions so exported sets start as clusters without heavy restructuring.
Decide whether planning depends on domain context inside the keyword explorer
Choose Ahrefs Keywords Explorer when SERP feature views must connect intent mapping to domain context during topic cluster planning. Choose SECockpit when triage needs built-in keyword relevance scoring paired with grouping so research lists get organized into content plans.
Operationalize gap audits using overlap style that matches the team’s inventory
Choose Moz Keyword Explorer when gap audits focus on overlap between targets and existing ranking pages through keyword cannibalization detection. Choose Serpstat Keyword Research when gap audits prioritize domain-to-keyword discovery using SERP overlap against competitor domains.
Scale research runs by matching the tool to the team’s automation and API expectations
If research scaling requires automation and an API-first approach, tools like Wordtracker trade off integration and API surface versus stronger competitors. If the team runs research as lighter workflows and expects exports for downstream steps, SE Ranking Keyword Research includes exports for downstream workflows while keeping cluster planning in the same interface.
Use question mining only when the output format matches the content production model
Choose QuestionDB when content planning starts from ask-style queries and the goal is question-to-keyword generation tied to intent-driven clusters. Choose LowFruits when planning needs SERP volatility signals and SERP feature occupancy context to anticipate ranking swings.
Who should buy which keyword research workflow
Different teams need different output formats for turning research into publishing work. The right purchase depends on whether the team’s bottleneck is clustering speed, SERP intent interpretation, or overlap-based gap audits.
SEO teams running intent-first briefs
Wordtracker’s SERP feature analysis per keyword fits teams that need result composition highlighted before content briefs are drafted. Mangools KWFinder supports the same intent screening approach with built-in SERP feature analysis presented in keyword tables.
Content planning teams that depend on seed-to-cluster repeatability
Semrush Keyword Magic Tool supports seed expansion and metric-driven filtering that turns seeds into theme buckets for content planning workflows. SE Ranking Keyword Research produces plan-ready topic clusters directly from expansions so exports feed downstream work.
Teams managing existing page inventory and cannibalization risk
Moz Keyword Explorer highlights keyword cannibalization detection so teams can map overlap between planned targets and current ranking pages. SECockpit supports prioritization by pairing SERP and competitor signals with keyword relevance scoring to triage large research sets.
Competitor-focused operators performing domain gap audits
Serpstat Keyword Research uses domain-to-keyword gap analysis based on SERP overlap against competitor domains. Ahrefs Keywords Explorer strengthens planning with SERP feature views that connect query intent patterns to domain context.
Teams building topic planning around volatility and question demand signals
LowFruits includes SERP volatility index signals tied to keyword targets so planning accounts for ranking swings. QuestionDB generates ask-style queries and groups them into content clusters for question-led topic planning.
Common buying and implementation pitfalls in keyword research search tooling
Keyword research tools fail when teams adopt them for outputs that do not match their planning workflow or reporting cadence. These pitfalls show up when clustering boundaries are ignored, SERP context is treated as interchangeable, or automation expectations are set without checking API and scaling behavior.
Choosing a tool for keyword volume exports but missing the SERP intent mechanism
Wordtracker’s SERP feature analysis per keyword is built to guide intent-aware briefs, while tools that only provide lists can leave teams doing manual interpretation. Teams should verify that SERP feature analysis appears alongside the targets the team will write for.
Treating clustering as a guaranteed match for publishing taxonomy without checking boundaries
Semrush Keyword Magic Tool can turn seeds into theme buckets, but clustering can feel opaque without manual curation. Ahrefs Keywords Explorer can mix intents within clusters without strict inclusion rules, so teams need a review step for cluster composition.
Planning gap audits with a mismatch between overlap logic and the team’s page inventory
Moz Keyword Explorer is designed for keyword cannibalization detection based on overlap between planned targets and existing ranking pages. Serpstat Keyword Research emphasizes domain-to-keyword gap analysis through SERP overlap against competitors, so it can require extra reconciliation when the workflow is inventory-first.
Assuming advanced monitoring views translate into daily operational use
LowFruits provides a SERP volatility index, but SERP scraping coverage can be uneven for niche result layouts. Serpstat Keyword Research includes SERP volatility index views, but they can be harder to operationalize for daily monitoring without additional team processes.
Underestimating automation and API expectations for multi-account SEO research
Wordtracker’s automation and API surface can lag behind stronger competitors, which becomes visible when research runs must scale across projects. Mangools KWFinder has minimal automation and API surface, so it can become a bottleneck for multi-account SEO operations.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Wordtracker, Semrush Keyword Magic Tool, Ahrefs Keywords Explorer, Moz Keyword Explorer, and seven additional tools against how they produce cluster-ready keyword sets and SERP context that teams can operationalize. Features counted for 40% of the scoring weight, and ease and value each counted for 30%.
Wordtracker earned the top rank at 9.3 Overall because SERP feature analysis per keyword is presented in a way that supports intent-aligned content briefs while still providing keyword clustering that reduces sorting time. Several competitors scored higher in specific mechanisms like repeatable seed-to-cluster filtering or domain gap analysis, but Wordtracker’s combination of SERP intent visibility and clustering workflow delivered the strongest end-to-end usability for keyword research planning.
Frequently Asked Questions About keyword research search software
How do Ahrefs Keywords Explorer and Semrush Keyword Magic Tool differ in seed-to-cluster workflows?
Which tool provides SERP feature analysis per keyword to guide intent screening during research?
How does Moz Keyword Explorer detect keyword cannibalization during keyword clustering?
When is it better to use LowFruits instead of SERP-focused keyword suites like Ahrefs or Semrush?
What breaks if a team treats SERP data as interchangeable across tools when planning content gaps?
How do QuestionDB and SE Ranking Keyword Research differ for question-led keyword discovery?
Which platforms support automation exports that keep keyword planning in sync with rank tracking setup?
How should admin controls and RBAC be evaluated for SEO teams using keyword research software?
What data migration steps are typically required when moving keyword projects from one tool to another?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
- Market ResearchTop 10 Best Keyword Finder Software of 2026
- Market ResearchTop 10 Best Keyword Rank Tracker Software of 2026
- Marketing AdvertisingTop 10 Best Website Search Engine Optimization Software of 2026
- Digital MarketingTop 10 Best Amazon Keyword Research Services of 2026
- Consumer RetailTop 10 Best Ecommerce Site Search Services of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Market Research alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of market research tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare market research tools→