GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Employment WorkforceTop 10 Best Job Application Management Software of 2026
Top 10 ranking of job application management software with criteria, strengths, and tradeoffs for teams comparing Loopcv, Jobscan, and Teal.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Loopcv is the best fit for teams that want a structured intake-to-tracking flow with consistent per-requisition review tasks, while CEIPAL is the stronger alternative if you’re a staffing or recruiting team needing configurable workflows plus CRM-style candidate reuse across roles.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Loopcv
Automation rules trigger stage transitions and reviewer task creation from screening inputs and decision actions.
Built for fits when teams need structured intake, automated tasking, and a consistent review workflow per requisition..
Jobscan
Editor pickJobscan’s resume-to-job posting matching generates targeted keyword and content suggestions per posting.
Built for fits when individual applicants need per-role resume tuning before submitting..
Teal
Editor pickApplication workflow templates that attach notes and tailored resume versions to each role.
Built for fits when teams standardize candidate-side steps and document tailoring, while an ATS owns approvals..
Related reading
Comparison Table
Job application management software centralizes intake, screening workflows, and candidate history so hiring teams can process high-volume applications with consistent governance. This ranked list targets analysts and technical evaluators who need integration and workflow configuration detail, prioritizing automation quality, data model fit, extensibility, and auditability over marketing claims.
Loopcv
SMBAutomated job application and tracking software.
Automation rules trigger stage transitions and reviewer task creation from screening inputs and decision actions.
Loopcv is built for teams that need a single pipeline view across requisitions and consistent application handling per job. The workflow layer supports stage-based progression, reviewer ownership, and status changes that match a hiring funnel from first review to final decision. Structured inputs for screening let teams apply knock-out criteria during intake while keeping the audit trail of what was submitted and how candidates were advanced. Loopcv also supports candidate record reuse so talent rediscovery can pull prior applicants into future requisitions without rebuilding profiles.
A key tradeoff is that deep customization of intake logic and reporting requires careful workflow design to avoid duplicated stages across similar roles. Loopcv fits best when a team wants to standardize review steps and reduce coordinator time by turning submissions and decisions into automatic tasks and state updates.
- +Stage-based pipeline keeps candidate status consistent across reviewers
- +Screening questions support structured knock-out during intake
- +Automation triggers move applications and create review tasks
- +Candidate profile reuse helps repurpose past applicants
- –Workflow design discipline is required to prevent stage sprawl
- –Advanced reporting depends on how stages and fields are modeled
- –Complex approval chains can require multiple workflow steps
- –Job board publishing support may require external process alignment
Recruiting ops teams
Standardize handoffs across requisitions
Faster pipeline throughput
Talent acquisition teams
Apply consistent screening criteria
More consistent evaluations
Show 2 more scenarios
Hiring managers
Own interview and decision steps
Fewer back-and-forth edits
Reviewer ownership links decisions to candidate records without extra manual updates.
SMB recruiting coordinators
Reuse candidate pools across roles
Reduced candidate rework
Candidate profile reuse supports talent rediscovery without re-entry of prior submissions.
Best for: Fits when teams need structured intake, automated tasking, and a consistent review workflow per requisition.
More related reading
Jobscan
SMBResume optimization and job application tracking platform.
Jobscan’s resume-to-job posting matching generates targeted keyword and content suggestions per posting.
Jobscan is most useful when resume versions are created and updated frequently, because the workflow is centered on fast re-scoring and specific change suggestions. The matching output typically highlights missing keywords and areas where resume sections may not mirror the job requirements. This makes it practical for applicant tracking system handoff scenarios where screening depends on resume text signals. A key differentiator is that it treats each job posting as an input for per-role analysis rather than treating a resume as a single static artifact.
A tradeoff is that Jobscan does not replace an applicant tracking system for recruiters, since it does not provide candidate pipeline stages, interview scheduling automation, or HRIS-driven provisioning. It fits best for job seekers who need to adapt their resume to each posting and then track which versions performed better across roles. It is less suitable when the main requirement is collaboration, role-based access control, or audit logging for recruiting teams.
- +Per-job matching highlights keyword gaps with actionable resume edits
- +Quick iteration supports testing multiple resume versions per role
- +Text-based scoring works well for most job posting formats
- +Comparisons across roles help prioritize targets
- –No recruiter workflow tools for pipelines or structured interview stages
- –Improves keyword alignment but cannot validate hiring outcomes
- –Setup relies on good job-description input quality
- –Limited governance controls for team-based resume operations
Job seekers
Tune resume for each job posting
Higher perceived resume-job alignment
Career switchers
Translate experience to new role requirements
Better match to target postings
Show 1 more scenario
High-volume applicants
Prioritize roles with best match
Reduced wasted applications
Run scans across multiple postings and focus effort on roles with stronger alignment.
Best for: Fits when individual applicants need per-role resume tuning before submitting.
Teal
SMBAll-in-one job application tracker and AI resume builder.
Application workflow templates that attach notes and tailored resume versions to each role.
Teal organizes each job application around a workflow that tracks statuses, contact notes, and document artifacts, which supports consistent execution across a candidate pipeline. Resume tailoring workflows can be reused across similar roles by storing variants and applying structured inputs during preparation. Integration depth matters most for teams that need to sync job data and progress with an applicant tracking system or related recruiting records.
A key tradeoff is that Teal’s workflow model can require disciplined configuration to match a complex requisition lifecycle inside an applicant tracking system. Teal fits best when the team needs candidate-side consistency and fast iteration on templates and notes, while the ATS remains the record system for approvals and compliance workflows.
- +Workflow checklists keep application steps consistent across roles.
- +Resume variant handling supports reuse when tailoring for similar jobs.
- +Centralized job notes reduce context loss between outreach and interviews.
- +Automation and integrations support status synchronization into recruiting systems.
- –Complex hiring steps may need careful mapping to an ATS lifecycle.
- –Advanced governance controls are less granular than enterprise HR suites.
- –Reporting is strongest for application throughput rather than requisition analytics.
Sales engineering candidates
Tailor resumes for role clusters
Faster, consistent applications
Recruiting coordinators
Track outreach and interview readiness
Fewer missed steps
Show 2 more scenarios
Talent teams managing pipelines
Sync progress with an ATS
Cleaner pipeline reporting
Integration options help keep application status aligned with downstream recruiting records.
HR operations analysts
Audit application workflow completion
Improved process consistency
Structured activity logs support checking which steps were completed for each role.
Best for: Fits when teams standardize candidate-side steps and document tailoring, while an ATS owns approvals.
ApplicantPro
SMBApplicant tracking software with job distribution, career pages, screening, and hiring workflows.
Knock-out question engine that routes candidates out early based on configurable criteria tied to each job requisition.
ApplicantPro helps recruiting teams manage job applications end to end with configurable intake, review queues, and candidate pipeline stages. It adds structured screening via configurable knock-out questions and resume parsing to convert incoming resumes into usable fields for faster triage.
The workflow layer supports hiring steps that map to each requisition, including consistent disposition handling from submission through rejection or next step scheduling. Admin controls focus on role-based access, auditability of actions, and governance over shared forms and templates across the organization.
- +Configurable application intake with reusable forms and stage-based pipelines
- +Knock-out questions and structured screening reduce manual review workload
- +Resume parsing maps submissions into consistent fields for faster triage
- +Governed review queues support consistent disposition handling across requisitions
- –Automation depth depends on workflow configuration, which can take time
- –Integration coverage can require add-ons for HRIS or identity setup
- –Reporting is strongest around workflow throughput, not deep attribution analytics
- –Complex hiring plans need careful rubric and stage configuration to avoid rework
Best for: Fits when hiring teams need structured application screening and governed review workflows across multiple roles.
CEIPAL
vertical specialistTalent acquisition software for staffing firms with applicant tracking, compliance, and workforce management.
Candidate pipeline reuse for talent rediscovery, linking past screening outcomes to new requisition routing.
CEIPAL manages job applications through configurable recruiting workflows that move candidates from inbound intake to final disposition. It combines applicant tracking features with candidate relationship management fields for ongoing talent rediscovery and pipeline reuse.
The system supports resume parsing, knockout logic, and structured intake steps so recruiters can enforce consistent screening criteria. Admin controls center on workflow configuration, role-based access boundaries, and audit-ready record trails for hiring activity tracking.
- +Workflow configuration supports multi-stage candidate routing without custom code
- +Candidate record continuity supports talent rediscovery across requisitions
- +Knockout question logic helps enforce consistent screening at intake
- +Recruiting activity history supports internal traceability for hiring decisions
- –Deep customization requires governance of workflow configuration and naming conventions
- –Complex reporting across multiple recruiting stages needs careful setup
- –API and automation coverage can be uneven for niche HRIS and HR data mappings
- –Advanced sourcing and pipeline analytics depend on consistent source tagging discipline
Best for: Fits when recruiting teams need configurable workflows plus CRM-style candidate reuse across roles.
Breezy HR
SMBApplicant tracking software with visual pipelines, interview tools, and job posting workflows.
Automation rules that change candidate stage ownership and trigger recruiter actions based on pipeline events.
Breezy HR manages job applications with a configurable pipeline, structured stages, and candidate record timelines. It emphasizes recruiter workflow automation through rules that drive status changes, assignments, and outreach touchpoints.
It also supports interview scheduling and scorecards tied to the hiring flow. Data export options and integrations help keep applicant pipeline history consistent across systems.
- +Configurable pipeline stages with clear status-driven recruiter workflows
- +Automation rules can move candidates and trigger follow-up actions
- +Interview scheduling and evaluation inputs align to the hiring flow
- +Exports and integrations support maintaining candidate history across tools
- –Advanced governance features need careful role setup to avoid access sprawl
- –Reporting depth for funnel analytics can lag ATS-focused incumbents
- –Resume parsing quality varies by resume formatting and layouts
- –Extensive customization requires ongoing admin attention as hiring templates change
Best for: Fits when teams want fast pipeline automation and consistent candidate-stage workflows without heavy ATS customization.
Greenhouse
enterpriseApplicant tracking software for structured recruiting workflows and hiring analytics.
Requisition-linked approval workflow with permissions controls ensures hiring decisions follow the job request end-to-end.
Greenhouse centers hiring workflow management around configurable stages, role-based permissions, and auditability across the requisition lifecycle. Structured interview planning supports scorecard rubrics, consistent interviewer assignments, and approvals that travel with each job request.
Candidate search and pipeline views connect recruiting execution to reporting on funnel movement and time-to-fill. The platform also supports HRIS and SSO integrations plus an API for automation across external systems.
- +Configurable hiring stages and approval steps track every requisition decision
- +Scorecard rubrics standardize structured interview scoring across interview panels
- +Role-based access supports segregation between recruiting, hiring managers, and admins
- +API and webhooks enable automation between Greenhouse and external tooling
- –Workflow configuration can become complex for high-volume teams
- –Advanced sourcing and enrichment depends on third-party integrations
- –Some reporting queries require careful data hygiene in custom fields
- –Interview scheduling automation may need tighter process design to avoid conflicts
Best for: Fits when recruiting teams need controlled workflow execution with configurable approvals and consistent interview scoring.
Ashby
enterpriseRecruiting software that combines applicant tracking, sourcing, scheduling, and funnel analytics.
Scorecard-based interview scoring with stage-aware workflow actions ties evaluations directly to candidate progression.
Ashby is a job application management system built around configurable hiring workflows and structured candidate data. The recruiting workflow supports scorecards, interview stages, and applicant movement tied to requisitions.
Ashby also provides an automation layer and an API surface for syncing job data and events with HR and recruiting tools. Reporting covers pipeline health and hiring funnel metrics to support operational review of time in stage and conversion.
- +Workflow automation keeps candidates synced to stage changes without manual tracking
- +Structured evaluations and scorecards help standardize interview scoring across teams
- +API supports event and data syncing between recruiting tools and hiring systems
- +Pipeline analytics show stage throughput and funnel conversion for operational reviews
- –RBAC and governance controls require careful setup to prevent role drift
- –Complex hiring processes can take time to model in the workflow configuration
- –Resume parsing quality varies by document formatting and requires review
- –Custom reporting needs more work than out-of-the-box pipeline views
Best for: Fits when talent teams need configurable hiring stages and scorecards with API-based integrations.
iCIMS
enterpriseEnterprise talent acquisition software covering applicant tracking, career sites, and hiring workflows.
Offer and approval workflow orchestration that keeps stakeholders aligned across requisition and candidate stages.
iCIMS manages job requisitions end to end, from candidate intake through interview and offer routing. The system supports configurable hiring workflows, structured screening and interview stages, and recruiter review of a shared candidate pipeline.
iCIMS also emphasizes integration with HR systems and identity providers for provisioning and access controls. Automation and extensibility options support event-driven processes such as stage transitions and candidate data synchronization.
- +Configurable hiring workflows that route requisitions and candidates through approvals
- +Integration options for HR systems and identity providers used in enterprise deployments
- +Structured screening and interview workflows that keep evaluation consistent
- +Audit-ready operational visibility for administrative changes and access activities
- –Workflow configuration requires governance to prevent inconsistent stage definitions
- –Complex setups can slow initial rollout for teams with many hiring templates
- –Advanced configuration depends on system administrators for ongoing refinements
- –Reporting depth may require careful configuration of tags and stage mapping
Best for: Fits when enterprise hiring operations need workflow control, enterprise integrations, and structured evaluation steps.
Teamtailor
SMBApplicant tracking software with branded career sites, candidate pipelines, and recruitment automation.
Configurable hiring workflows that connect custom application intake to stage-based decisions and interview feedback in one pipeline.
Teamtailor helps recruiting teams manage the candidate pipeline inside a configurable hiring workflow tied to job requisitions. Strong recruiter-facing capabilities include custom application forms, knock-out questions, and structured scorecard-style feedback to standardize interviews.
The system also supports career site branding and automated job publishing workflows to keep candidate flow and status updates consistent. Teamtailor pairs this workflow with collaboration features for hiring teams, including role-based access and centralized candidate records.
- +Knock-out questions reduce low-signal applications before pipeline reviews
- +Custom application forms support structured intake that matches each role
- +Collaboration tools keep interview feedback tied to the same candidate record
- +Career site pages and job publishing workflows align branding with hiring
- –Complex multi-stage pipelines need careful configuration to avoid inconsistent statuses
- –Advanced reporting depth lags systems focused heavily on analytics
- –High automation scenarios depend on workflow setup rather than out-of-the-box templates
- –External system connectivity can require additional implementation effort
Best for: Fits when recruiting teams want configurable application intake and standardized interview feedback.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 employment workforce, Loopcv stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right job application management software
Job application management software covers the intake-to-decision workflow from application form submission to stage transitions, approvals, and structured interview outputs. This buyer’s guide covers Loopcv, Jobscan, Teal, ApplicantPro, CEIPAL, Breezy HR, Greenhouse, Ashby, iCIMS, and Teamtailor to map how each product handles routing and review automation.
The strongest contenders in this category use automation rules to create reviewer tasks and move candidates based on screening inputs and decision actions. Loopcv leads with stage-transition triggers and reviewer task creation from intake and actions, while ApplicantPro focuses on knock-out questions tied to each job requisition.
Job application management software for structured intake, stage automation, and approval workflows
Job application management software organizes applications into a controlled pipeline so teams can standardize screening, routing, and evaluation across requisitions. Products like Loopcv translate screening inputs into stage transitions and reviewer task creation so candidate status stays consistent across reviewers.
These tools also reduce manual work by enforcing structured decision steps such as knock-out screening and scorecard-based interviews. ApplicantPro routes early dismissals using knock-out question engines tied to each requisition, and Greenhouse adds requisition-linked approval workflows with permissions controls that track each decision from request to outcome.
Routing automation, structured screening, and controlled approvals
Job application management software should convert intake data into deterministic routing so candidates move through stages the same way across reviewers and roles. Loopcv is the clearest example because automation rules trigger stage transitions and create reviewer tasks from screening inputs and decision actions.
Stage-transition automation with reviewer task creation
Loopcv triggers stage transitions and creates reviewer tasks from screening inputs and decision actions so pipeline movement is tied to intake signals. Breezy HR also uses automation rules to change candidate stage ownership and trigger recruiter actions based on pipeline events.
Requisition-linked knock-out screening tied to intake criteria
ApplicantPro routes candidates out early using knock-out questions configured per job requisition to reduce low-signal review volume. Teamtailor also uses knock-out questions to reduce low-signal applications before pipeline reviews, while keeping custom application forms per role.
Structured interview scoring tied to workflow stages
Greenhouse uses scorecard rubrics that standardize structured interview scoring across interview panels. Ashby extends the same idea by tying stage-aware workflow actions to scorecard-based interview scoring, which keeps evaluations aligned to progression.
Requisition and offer workflow orchestration with stakeholder approvals
Greenhouse provides requisition-linked approval workflow steps with permissions controls so approvals track decision execution end-to-end. iCIMS orchestrates offer and approval workflows across requisition and candidate stages to keep enterprise stakeholders aligned.
Candidate record continuity for talent rediscovery across roles
CEIPAL focuses on candidate pipeline reuse so past screening outcomes can support new requisition routing for talent rediscovery. This model differs from tools that mostly treat each requisition as a fresh intake without explicit reuse mapping.
Workflow templates that standardize candidate-side actions and notes
Teal provides application workflow templates that attach notes and tailored resume versions to each role so applicant-side steps stay consistent. Teal is positioned for scenarios where an ATS owns approvals but the application workflow standardization still needs to be enforced.
Choose based on who owns workflow logic and how automation gets modeled
Start by deciding where workflow logic lives. Loopcv and Breezy HR emphasize automation rules that change candidate stage ownership and trigger recruiter actions from pipeline events, so the product behavior is driven by stage and field modeling.
Map automation triggers to the same signals used in screening
If screening inputs and decision actions must deterministically create reviewer work and move stages, choose Loopcv because automation rules trigger stage transitions and reviewer task creation from those inputs and actions. If stage changes should trigger follow-up recruiter actions quickly without heavy workflow redesign, Breezy HR also supports automation rules that move candidates and fire recruiter actions based on pipeline events.
Pick knock-out routing when early dismissal criteria must be governed per requisition
If knock-out criteria must be configured per job requisition to route candidates out early, select ApplicantPro because its knock-out question engine is tied to each requisition. If structured intake forms must match each role while knock-out reduces low-signal volume, Teamtailor supports custom application forms and knock-out questions inside the same pipeline.
Standardize evaluation output with scorecards tied to stages and panels
When interview scoring consistency matters across multiple interviewers, select Greenhouse because scorecard rubrics standardize structured interview scoring across panels. When evaluations must stay synchronized with candidate progression through stage-aware workflow actions, Ashby connects stage changes to scorecard-based interview scoring.
Select approval-orchestrated workflows for regulated or multi-stakeholder hiring
If hiring decisions must follow a requisition request end-to-end with permissions-controlled approvals, Greenhouse is built around requisition-linked approval workflow steps. If enterprise hiring operations require routing across requisition and candidate stages with offer and approval orchestration, iCIMS supports that stakeholder workflow control.
Choose workflow templates when applicant-side steps need repeatable documentation
If teams need application workflow templates that attach notes and tailored resume versions to each role, choose Teal. This fit depends on the ATS owning approvals, because Teal is positioned to standardize the application workflow around applicant-side steps and reusable resume variants.
Choose candidate reuse when past screening outcomes must route into new roles
If talent rediscovery depends on linking past screening outcomes to new requisition routing, select CEIPAL because it reuses candidate pipeline history for multi-role routing. If hiring teams instead need per-applicant resume tuning without recruiter pipeline workflow tools, Jobscan serves that individual applicant workflow rather than requisition-level routing.
Teams that need controlled intake-to-decision workflows
Recruiting teams need job application management software when structured intake and routing must be consistent across requisitions. Tools like Loopcv and ApplicantPro focus on turning intake criteria into stage transitions or knock-out routing so manual triage does not become the bottleneck.
High-volume recruiting teams with repeatable screening logic
Loopcv standardizes stage transitions and reviewer task creation from screening inputs and decision actions, which supports consistent routing across reviewers. ApplicantPro and Teamtailor also reduce manual review load with knock-out question engines tied to requisition-specific criteria.
Teams that require structured interview scoring across panels
Greenhouse uses scorecard rubrics that standardize structured interview scoring across interview panels. Ashby keeps evaluations tied to candidate progression through stage-aware workflow actions linked to scorecard scoring.
Recruiting operations with multi-stakeholder approvals
Greenhouse tracks every requisition decision with requisition-linked approval workflow steps and permissions controls. iCIMS keeps stakeholders aligned with configurable hiring workflows that route requisitions and candidates through approvals and offer steps.
Recruiting teams running talent rediscovery across requisitions
CEIPAL supports candidate pipeline reuse so past screening outcomes can be linked to new requisition routing. This candidate record continuity supports rediscovery workflows without rebuilding every intake from scratch.
Individuals optimizing resumes against role-specific requirements
Jobscan targets per-job resume-to-job posting matching by generating targeted keyword and content suggestions. This use case focuses on individual applicant tuning rather than recruiter pipeline workflow and structured interview stages.
Workflow design and governance errors that break routing consistency
Mistakes usually occur when teams model stages and fields without a governance plan for how candidates move and who can edit workflow definitions. Loopcv flags that workflow design discipline is required to prevent stage sprawl, and Breezy HR warns that advanced governance needs careful role setup to avoid access sprawl.
Creating too many stages without controlling stage naming and field mapping
Loopcv requires workflow design discipline to prevent stage sprawl, and CEIPAL notes governance over workflow configuration naming conventions for deep customization.
Treating knock-out screening as a one-time form change instead of a requisition governance workflow
ApplicantPro’s knock-out routing depends on configurable intake and stage-based pipelines, so workflows need deliberate setup to ensure criteria consistently route candidates out early.
Expecting resume matching tools to manage recruiter routing and interview workflows
Jobscan is designed for resume-to-job posting matching and keyword suggestions, and it lacks recruiter workflow tools for pipelines or structured interview stages.
Underestimating approval configuration complexity for multi-step hiring flows
Greenhouse warns that workflow configuration can become complex for high-volume teams, and iCIMS notes that workflow configuration governance is needed to prevent inconsistent stage definitions.
Allowing role drift in RBAC without a defined access model
Ashby cautions that RBAC and governance controls require careful setup to prevent role drift, and Breezy HR says governance features need careful role setup to avoid access sprawl.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated each product on routing and task automation so stage transitions and reviewer work are driven by screening inputs and decision actions. We weighted features at 40% because automation rules, knock-out engines, and scorecard-based stage synchronization materially change throughput for hiring teams.
We weighted ease and value at 30% each because workflow setup and operational usability determine whether stage-based logic stays consistent across requisitions. Loopcv ranked highest because stage-transition triggers and reviewer task creation from screening inputs and decision actions deliver the most direct end-to-end automation for application management workflows.
Frequently Asked Questions About job application management software
How do Loopcv and ApplicantPro route applications into different review stages for each requisition?
When does Teal fit better than Greenhouse for teams that standardize candidate-side tasks but keep ATS approvals separate?
Which tools support resume parsing and structured extraction into fields recruiters can act on immediately?
What breaks if an admin forgets RBAC setup in iCIMS versus Breezy HR?
How do Breezy HR and Ashby implement stage-driven automation without losing audit context?
When teams need an API for external workflow orchestration, how do Greenhouse and iCIMS differ?
How do tools handle structured interview scoring and scorecard rubrics across recruiters?
What does CEIPAL enable for talent rediscovery that is not typical in basic applicant tracking workflows?
How do Greenhouse and Teamtailor approach job publishing and knock-out criteria for candidate intake?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Employment Workforce alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of employment workforce tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare employment workforce tools→