Top 10 Best Interactive Education Software of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE

Education Learning

Top 10 Best Interactive Education Software of 2026

Compare the top Interactive Education Software picks with a ranked list for classrooms, featuring Kahoot!, Nearpod, and Pear Deck. Explore now!

10 tools compared25 min readUpdated todayAI-verified · Expert reviewed
How we ranked these tools
01Feature Verification

Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.

02Multimedia Review Aggregation

Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.

03Synthetic User Modeling

AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.

04Human Editorial Review

Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.

Read our full methodology →

Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy

Interactive education software drives measurable participation through live responses, formative checks, and collaborative tasks across in-room and remote learning. This ranked list helps educators compare strengths across game-based lessons, interactive video, authoring tools, and classroom platforms so lesson delivery and assessment stay aligned.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

Kahoot!

Live game mode with PIN join and instant leaderboard-driven feedback

Built for teachers seeking fast, interactive quiz delivery with quick class-wide feedback.

2

Nearpod

Editor pick

Live participation with real-time student results across slides

Built for k to higher-education teams needing guided interactive lessons and monitoring.

3

Pear Deck

Editor pick

Interactive Google Slides add-on with live question prompts and response monitoring

Built for teachers creating interactive slide lessons with real-time student checks.

Comparison Table

This comparison table evaluates interactive education software used for classroom quizzes, polls, and live student participation, including Kahoot!, Nearpod, Pear Deck, Blooket, and Quizizz. Each row summarizes key capabilities such as question types, game or presentation modes, assignment workflows, and reporting so teams can match tools to specific teaching and assessment needs. Readers can use the side-by-side details to compare fit across formative lessons, remote instruction, and real-time engagement activities.

1
Kahoot!Best overall
interactive quizzes
9.3/10
Overall
2
live lesson delivery
9.0/10
Overall
3
slide interactivity
8.6/10
Overall
4
game-based learning
8.3/10
Overall
5
quiz platform
8.0/10
Overall
6
formative assessment
7.7/10
Overall
7
content authoring
7.3/10
Overall
8
interactive video quizzes
7.0/10
Overall
9
collaboration walls
6.7/10
Overall
10
collaborative learning
6.3/10
Overall
#1

Kahoot!

interactive quizzes

Interactive game-based learning that delivers live quizzes, discussions, and learning activities to classrooms and remote sessions.

9.3/10
Overall
Features9.2/10
Ease of Use9.6/10
Value9.1/10
Standout feature

Live game mode with PIN join and instant leaderboard-driven feedback

Kahoot! stands out for turning classroom concepts into fast, competitive quiz games with real-time participation. Teachers can create questions in multiple formats, run live sessions, and collect aggregated results immediately. Learners join via game PIN and see questions and answer choices on their own devices. Reporting and sharing options support repeated practice across lessons, classes, and groups.

Pros
  • +Real-time quiz gameplay keeps class engagement high
  • +Question creation supports multiple formats like multiple-choice and true-false
  • +Instant results show performance trends during live sessions
  • +PIN-based joining works across student devices without setup friction
  • +Content sharing enables reuse of existing Kahoot! activities
Cons
  • Competitive pacing can pressure slower readers
  • Live sessions depend on stable student connectivity
  • Deep instructional authoring beyond quizzes stays limited
  • Analytics focus on game outcomes rather than detailed learning objectives
  • Large question banks can become hard to manage

Best for: Teachers seeking fast, interactive quiz delivery with quick class-wide feedback

#2

Nearpod

live lesson delivery

Real-time interactive lessons that stream slide content while collecting student responses and providing teacher control.

9.0/10
Overall
Features9.1/10
Ease of Use8.9/10
Value8.9/10
Standout feature

Live participation with real-time student results across slides

Nearpod stands out for turning teacher lesson slides into interactive, student-paced activities delivered directly in class. It supports live participation with activities like polls, quizzes, collaborative drawing, and web content embedded into lessons. Teachers can launch interactive sessions and monitor real-time results, including responses per slide and overall pacing. The platform also enables assignment workflows with offline-capable student access and teacher view of submitted work.

Pros
  • +Interactive slides with polls, quizzes, and activities built into lesson flow
  • +Real-time student monitoring shows responses as learners progress
  • +Collaborative tools like drawing and polls support engagement during instruction
  • +Assignment mode collects student work with reviewable teacher visibility
Cons
  • Lesson building can feel constrained compared with full authoring suites
  • Some student interactions rely on stable device and connectivity performance
  • Resource organization in large libraries can become time-consuming

Best for: K to higher-education teams needing guided interactive lessons and monitoring

#3

Pear Deck

slide interactivity

Interactive Google Slides and teacher-paced lessons with student check-ins, formative responses, and activity prompts.

8.6/10
Overall
Features8.4/10
Ease of Use8.9/10
Value8.7/10
Standout feature

Interactive Google Slides add-on with live question prompts and response monitoring

Pear Deck stands out with its tight integration between interactive questions and slide-based teaching flows. Presenters add prompts directly onto Google Slides to collect student responses in real time during class. It supports multiple question types like multiple choice, open-ended responses, polls, and collaborative drawing. Teacher dashboards summarize participation and responses so instruction can adapt immediately.

Pros
  • +Interactive questions are embedded directly into Google Slides lessons
  • +Real-time student responses show on teacher dashboards during delivery
  • +Multiple response formats include polls, multiple choice, and open-ended prompts
  • +Student drawing and collaborative visuals support creative activities
  • +Works well for pacing since prompts follow the slide flow
Cons
  • Best experience depends on building content in slide format
  • Open-ended feedback review can become time-consuming for large classes
  • Device constraints can limit smooth student drawing interactions
  • Managing many activities across decks can feel operationally heavy

Best for: Teachers creating interactive slide lessons with real-time student checks

#4

Blooket

game-based learning

Game-based formative learning that lets teachers run interactive questions in live sessions with student dashboards.

8.3/10
Overall
Features8.2/10
Ease of Use8.5/10
Value8.3/10
Standout feature

Game modes like Battle Royale and Tower Defense that make quiz answers drive gameplay

Blooket stands out for turning existing question banks into fast, game-like classroom activities with visible live competition. The platform supports multiple play modes such as live quizzes, tower defense style gameplay, and other time-based game formats that keep answers tied to action. Teachers can create or select question sets, run sessions with student join codes, and review results after play. Student progress is reinforced through leaderboards and game outcomes that map directly to correct responses.

Pros
  • +Quick start classroom sessions using join codes and real-time prompts
  • +Multiple interactive game modes tied directly to quiz questions
  • +Built-in question creation and imported question sets for faster setup
  • +Detailed post-game results highlight correctness by question and player
  • +Student engagement increases through leaderboards and game rewards
Cons
  • Some game modes can shift focus from deep explanations
  • Great for retrieval practice, weaker for complex open-ended responses
  • Content quality varies heavily with user-created question sets
  • Session pacing depends on internet reliability and device performance

Best for: Teachers running competitive quiz lessons and quick review games

#5

Quizizz

quiz platform

Asynchronous and live quiz practice with interactive question types, teacher analytics, and student engagement modes.

8.0/10
Overall
Features7.9/10
Ease of Use7.8/10
Value8.3/10
Standout feature

Live quiz sessions with student-driven pacing and instant feedback

Quizizz stands out for turning classroom review into fast, game-like quiz sessions with student-paced answers. It supports question creation from scratch or imports, then runs quizzes in live, homework, or self-paced modes. Detailed performance reports show question-level accuracy, time on task, and class or student results for instructional follow-up. Built-in question types such as multiple choice and short response help educators vary assessment styles without complex setup.

Pros
  • +Live and self-paced quiz modes support multiple teaching workflows
  • +Question library and import options speed up content creation
  • +Question-level analytics reveal common misconceptions
  • +Student results and pacing metrics support targeted reteaching
Cons
  • Question type variety is narrower than full LMS assessments
  • Real-time classroom pacing can feel rigid for slower classes
  • Custom branding and layout options are limited for advanced needs

Best for: Teachers needing quick, student-paced practice with actionable question analytics

#6

Socrative

formative assessment

Teacher-led interactive assessments with quizzes, exit tickets, and real-time results for classroom feedback.

7.7/10
Overall
Features7.5/10
Ease of Use7.8/10
Value7.7/10
Standout feature

Live “Quick Question” session for instant, teacher-driven polling and responses

Socrative stands out for quick, classroom-ready question delivery and real-time student responses. It supports live quizzes, self-paced activities, and teacher-controlled sessions through a simple interface. Teachers can review results immediately with basic analytics and can export performance data after activities. The tool is designed for rapid feedback loops during instruction rather than complex course management.

Pros
  • +Live quiz mode supports immediate student answers and instant teacher visibility
  • +Self-paced activities let students practice without continuous teacher control
  • +Question types include multiple choice, true false, short answer
  • +Results reporting summarizes performance for quick instructional follow-up
  • +Works well on mobile browsers for student participation
Cons
  • Limited assessment depth compared to LMS-grade testing and question banks
  • Classroom sessions require careful device and browser readiness from students
  • Analytics focus on outcomes and less on item-level diagnostics
  • Advanced customization and branding are minimal for larger teaching programs

Best for: Teachers needing fast formative checks and live feedback across devices

#7

H5P

content authoring

Open-source authoring of interactive HTML5 learning content like quizzes, presentations, and simulations.

7.3/10
Overall
Features7.4/10
Ease of Use7.1/10
Value7.5/10
Standout feature

Interactive video content type with clickable hotspots and embedded knowledge checks

H5P distinguishes itself by enabling interactive content authoring with reusable components like quizzes, interactive videos, and presentations. Core capabilities include a library of ready-made content types and an editor that supports adding interactions to web-based learning experiences. Content can be embedded in websites and integrated into common learning environments, with scoring available for many assessments. Delivery supports both learner engagement features and instructor-friendly tracking for selected activity types.

Pros
  • +Large library of interaction types including quizzes and interactive video
  • +Reusable content blocks speed up building consistent learning modules
  • +Works well with embedding and learning platform integrations
  • +Supports learner analytics for quiz-based activities
Cons
  • Some authoring tasks require technical comfort with templates and tools
  • Advanced branching logic can become complex to maintain
  • Tracking is uneven across content types and interaction patterns
  • Media-rich designs can be heavy for low-bandwidth learners

Best for: Teams building standards-aligned interactive lessons without heavy custom development

#8

Edpuzzle

interactive video quizzes

Interactive video lessons that embed questions into video playback and return student performance data.

7.0/10
Overall
Features7.3/10
Ease of Use6.8/10
Value6.9/10
Standout feature

Timestamped video questions with per-student response tracking in the lesson dashboard

Edpuzzle stands out by turning existing videos into interactive lessons with embedded questions at precise timestamps. Educators can assign video-based homework, run readiness checks, and review detailed student responses in a dashboard. The platform supports question types like multiple choice and open-ended prompts while tracking completion and progress across lessons. Content can be reused through teacher-created libraries and remixed into new activities.

Pros
  • +Interactive video questions trigger at specific timestamps for precise assessment
  • +Student dashboards show completion status and response details per question
  • +Multiple question formats support quick checks and guided feedback
  • +Easy lesson assignment for classes with trackable viewing progress
Cons
  • Lesson building is limited to video-based activities and prompts
  • Open-ended responses lack structured analytics for faster grading
  • Integration depth with school systems can be uneven across setups

Best for: Teachers creating interactive video homework and formative checks for classes

#9

Padlet

collaboration walls

Interactive class boards for collaborative posting with prompts, moderation tools, and student engagement views.

6.7/10
Overall
Features6.8/10
Ease of Use6.4/10
Value6.8/10
Standout feature

Real-time commenting and submission moderation on shared class boards

Padlet stands out with instant, drag-and-drop creation of interactive wall boards for collaboration. It supports multiple layouts like grids and timelines, plus embedding and posting of text, files, links, and media. Roles and sharing controls enable classroom use for viewing, commenting, and posting based on configured permissions. Built-in moderation tools help manage responses for class activities and formative feedback cycles.

Pros
  • +Create interactive boards fast with drag-and-drop blocks
  • +Supports multiple layouts like grid, stream, and timeline
  • +Embed files, links, images, and videos in posts
  • +Class sharing controls enable view, comment, or posting permissions
  • +Moderation tools support managing student submissions
Cons
  • Board sharing requires careful permission setup for classes
  • Advanced workflows depend on external tools for grading
  • Large media-heavy boards can feel slow to navigate
  • Offline creation is limited because editing is web-based

Best for: Classroom activities needing quick interactive sharing and feedback boards

#10

Microsoft Teams Education

collaborative learning

Classroom-ready interactive communication with meetings, assignments, and integrated learning experiences for groups.

6.3/10
Overall
Features6.7/10
Ease of Use6.1/10
Value6.1/10
Standout feature

Assignments in Teams connects rubric scoring to student submissions within each class team

Microsoft Teams Education stands out with deep integration into Microsoft 365 for Education, including Assignments, rubrics, and grading workflows inside Teams. It supports live classes with meeting controls, recordings, and moderated collaboration for group learning. Built-in chat, channels, and file storage keep course content and discussions organized across devices. Education-focused admin and compliance tools help schools manage users, retention, and access for learning data.

Pros
  • +Assignments workflow links student submissions to grades and rubrics inside Teams
  • +Meeting recording and attendance-style participation support review and accountability
  • +Teams channels organize classes, resources, and student discussions cleanly
  • +Microsoft 365 integration centralizes Word, Excel, OneNote, and SharePoint files
Cons
  • Course structure can become cluttered without strict channel governance
  • File sharing is powerful but requires consistent folder and permissions discipline
  • Large classes can feel heavy due to meeting traffic and notification volume
  • Some education-specific tools depend on correct Microsoft 365 configuration

Best for: Schools running Microsoft 365 learning workflows with group collaboration and grading

How to Choose the Right Interactive Education Software

This buyer's guide explains how to select interactive education software tools such as Kahoot!, Nearpod, Pear Deck, Blooket, Quizizz, Socrative, H5P, Edpuzzle, Padlet, and Microsoft Teams Education. It maps specific classroom goals to the capabilities these tools actually provide, including live quiz gameplay, slide-based prompts, interactive video questions, and moderated collaboration boards. It also covers common implementation pitfalls tied to connectivity, content organization, and instructional depth.

What Is Interactive Education Software?

Interactive education software creates learning activities where students respond during instruction or while completing assignments. These tools solve the problems of low engagement, slow feedback loops, and difficulty tracking who answered what in a classroom session. Some tools deliver live quiz gameplay with instant results and joining via a game PIN, such as Kahoot!. Other tools stream guided lesson slides with real-time student monitoring across the lesson flow, such as Nearpod.

Key Features to Look For

The right feature set determines whether interactivity stays focused on instruction or becomes only engagement.

  • Live game mode with instant, aggregated results

    Kahoot! excels at live game mode with PIN-based joining and instant results that show performance trends during a session. Blooket also uses join codes and leaderboards to tie quiz answers to visible game outcomes.

  • Real-time participation monitoring across a lesson flow

    Nearpod provides real-time student monitoring with responses per slide and overall pacing as a lesson progresses. Pear Deck supports live question prompts embedded directly into Google Slides with teacher dashboards that show participation and responses during delivery.

  • Multiple response formats beyond basic multiple choice

    Pear Deck supports multiple-choice, polls, open-ended responses, and collaborative drawing prompts inside slide flows. Kahoot! supports multiple question formats like multiple-choice and true-false, and Edpuzzle supports multiple choice and open-ended prompts embedded into video playback.

  • Question-level analytics for targeted reteaching

    Quizizz delivers question-level accuracy and time on task so teams can identify which items drive misconceptions. Kahoot! and Blooket provide post-game results that highlight correctness by question and player, which supports fast follow-up after live play.

  • Timestamped interactive video with per-student response tracking

    Edpuzzle stands out by embedding questions at precise video timestamps and returning per-student dashboard data for each question. H5P offers interactive video content type with clickable hotspots and embedded knowledge checks for reusable interactive modules.

  • Interactive collaboration with moderation controls

    Padlet enables interactive class boards with real-time commenting and submission moderation to manage student responses. Microsoft Teams Education supports interactive group learning through channels plus Assignments workflows that connect submissions to rubrics and grading inside Teams.

How to Choose the Right Interactive Education Software

Choice should follow the delivery moment, the required response types, and the level of analytics needed for instructional follow-up.

  • Match the tool to the delivery mode: live classroom, student-paced, or embedded into content

    For fast live participation with a game PIN and instant leaderboard feedback, choose Kahoot! or Blooket. For slide-driven instruction where teacher control guides responses throughout the deck, choose Nearpod or Pear Deck. For student-paced practice with live or homework workflows, choose Quizizz or Socrative.

  • Lock in the response types that fit the learning objective

    If learning objectives require embedded prompts inside Google Slides, choose Pear Deck because prompts follow the slide flow and show real-time response monitoring. If objectives depend on video comprehension checks, choose Edpuzzle because questions trigger at specific timestamps and appear in a per-student dashboard. If objectives require open-ended responses, compare tools because Pear Deck and Edpuzzle include open-ended prompts but open-ended grading can become time-consuming for large classes.

  • Verify analytics depth: item-level, per-slide, or per-video-question reporting

    For item-level diagnostics that support reteaching, choose Quizizz because it reports question-level accuracy and time on task. For response monitoring across every slide in a guided lesson, choose Nearpod because teacher view shows responses per slide and pacing. For live quiz outcomes tied to players and correctness by question, choose Kahoot! or Blooket.

  • Plan content creation and reuse around the tool’s authoring workflow

    If teaching relies on quickly running existing quiz content, Kahoot! and Blooket support importing and building question sets for faster classroom sessions. If teaching relies on interactive slide delivery, Pear Deck works best when lessons are built as slide-based prompts. If building interactive learning modules that can embed into web experiences matters, choose H5P for reusable interaction components like interactive video with hotspots.

  • Confirm operational fit for device connectivity and classroom logistics

    If live participation depends on stable student device connectivity, choose Kahoot! or Socrative with a plan for fast joining and low-latency play. If moderation and collaborative submissions must happen in a shared workspace, choose Padlet with configured permissions and moderation controls. If the school already runs Microsoft 365 for Education and needs assignments, rubrics, and grading workflows inside group collaboration, choose Microsoft Teams Education.

Who Needs Interactive Education Software?

Interactive education software fits teams that need live engagement, guided interactive lessons, formative checks, interactive video homework, or collaborative submission workflows.

  • Teachers seeking fast interactive quiz delivery with quick class-wide feedback

    Kahoot! fits because it delivers live game mode with PIN join and instant leaderboard-driven feedback. Blooket fits for classrooms that want competitive game modes like Battle Royale and Tower Defense that drive gameplay with correct quiz answers.

  • K to higher-education teams needing guided interactive lessons and monitoring

    Nearpod fits because it streams slide content and collects student responses while teachers monitor results in real time across the lesson. Pear Deck fits because it embeds interactive questions directly into Google Slides and shows response monitoring on teacher dashboards during delivery.

  • Teachers needing quick student-paced practice with actionable question analytics

    Quizizz fits because it supports live and self-paced modes and reports question-level accuracy plus time on task for instructional follow-up. Socrative fits for simpler formative checks where teachers can run live quizzes or quick question sessions across mobile browsers.

  • Teachers creating interactive video homework and formative checks for classes

    Edpuzzle fits because it embeds timestamped questions into video playback and tracks per-student responses in a lesson dashboard. H5P fits for teams building standards-aligned interactive video content with clickable hotspots and reusable components that can be embedded into learning experiences.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Several recurring pitfalls come from mismatches between instructional goals and the tool’s strongest workflow.

  • Choosing a live quiz tool without planning for device connectivity

    Kahoot! and Blooket rely on stable connectivity for live participation and timely gameplay. Socrative also depends on students using the right browsers and devices for quick live quiz response.

  • Building lessons in the wrong format for the platform’s authoring model

    Pear Deck delivers the best experience when prompts are built into a slide-based flow, so slide alignment matters for classroom pacing. Nearpod can feel constrained for teams that need full authoring beyond interactive slide lessons.

  • Assuming open-ended responses will be fast to grade at scale

    Pear Deck open-ended response review can become time-consuming for large classes. Edpuzzle includes open-ended prompts, but grading speed depends on how the dashboard output is processed for each learner.

  • Overusing game engagement when deep instructional assessment is required

    Blooket game modes can shift focus away from deep explanations and complex open-ended responses. Quizizz focuses on quiz practice with question analytics, while Socrative emphasizes fast formative feedback rather than LMS-grade assessment depth.

How We Selected and Ranked These Tools

We evaluated each of the ten tools on three sub-dimensions. Features carried a weight of 0.4. Ease of use carried a weight of 0.3. Value carried a weight of 0.3. The overall rating equals 0.40 × features plus 0.30 × ease of use plus 0.30 × value. Kahoot! separated itself from lower-ranked tools with its live game mode features that combine PIN-based joining, instant leaderboard-driven feedback, and fast question creation formats that keep classroom engagement high.

Frequently Asked Questions About Interactive Education Software

Which tool fits live classroom quiz delivery with instant participation and results?
Kahoot! is built for live quiz games where learners join via a game PIN and see questions on their own devices. Teachers can run live sessions and immediately review aggregated results.
Which interactive platform best supports teacher-led slide lessons with student responses per slide?
Nearpod turns teacher lesson slides into interactive, student-paced activities that report responses in real time. Pear Deck adds interactive question prompts directly inside Google Slides and summarizes participation on a teacher dashboard.
Which option works best for review games that map correct answers to gameplay?
Blooket connects quiz accuracy to game outcomes through modes like Battle Royale and Tower Defense. Quizizz also uses game-like quiz sessions, but it emphasizes student-paced answering with detailed performance reports.
Which tool is strongest for formative checks that can be launched fast during class?
Socrative is designed for quick, classroom-ready question delivery with live quizzes and teacher-controlled sessions. Kahoot! also supports rapid live engagement, but its game PIN flow centers on competitive quiz participation.
Which platform is best for interactive video homework with embedded questions at exact timestamps?
Edpuzzle converts existing videos into interactive lessons by inserting questions at precise timestamps. H5P supports interactive video content via clickable hotspots and embedded knowledge checks in web-based learning experiences.
Which tool is better for collaboration boards where students post, comment, and moderate submissions?
Padlet enables real-time creation of interactive wall boards with drag-and-drop posts, comments, and multiple layouts like grids and timelines. Its moderation tools help manage student submissions and feedback cycles.
Which option integrates interactive learning into Google Slides or similar slide workflows?
Pear Deck integrates directly into Google Slides by placing prompts on the slide canvas and collecting live student responses. Nearpod also runs interactive slide experiences, with teacher monitoring of results by slide and pacing.
Which tool supports interactive content authoring with reusable components and embeddable learning experiences?
H5P provides an authoring editor plus a library of reusable interactive content types such as quizzes and interactive videos. It supports embedding into websites and common learning environments with tracking for selected activity types.
Which platform is best for managing classes that already run through Microsoft 365 for Education workflows?
Microsoft Teams Education fits schools using Microsoft 365 for Education because assignments, rubrics, and grading workflows run inside Teams. It also supports moderated group collaboration and meeting controls alongside the learning data management needed for administration.

Conclusion

After evaluating 10 education learning, Kahoot! stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
Kahoot!

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

Logos provided by Logo.dev

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.