GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Remote And Hybrid Work In IndustryTop 10 Best Hybrid Project Management Software of 2026
Top 10 hybrid project management software picks for teams, ranked with comparisons of monday.com, Asana, and Jira alternatives plus Smartsheet, Wrike.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Smartsheet is the best hybrid pick when PMO and project teams need schedule views, approvals, and API-driven tracking in one place, while Planview AdaptiveWork fits if you’re planning hybrid delivery across Agile and traditional work with portfolio rollups.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Smartsheet
Approval workflows combined with field-driven automation can gate updates until required stakeholders approve deliverables.
Built for fits when PMO and project teams need schedule views, approvals, and API-driven integrations in one tracking system..
Wrike
Editor pickWrike automation rules can trigger workflow updates and task routing based on defined conditions.
Built for fits when PMO groups need cross-team reporting plus workflow automation without breaking project control..
Zoho Projects
Editor pickREST API plus webhooks enable external systems to mirror Zoho Projects task events in near real time.
Built for fits when PMOs want Zoho-based governance with Gantt and kanban execution in one workflow..
Related reading
- Remote And Hybrid Work In IndustryTop 10 Best Hybrid Workplace Software of 2026
- Remote And Hybrid Work In IndustryTop 10 Best Agile Collaboration Software of 2026
- Business Process OutsourcingTop 10 Best Company Project Management Software of 2026
- Sales & Leadership TrainingTop 10 Best Agile Project Management Services of 2026
Comparison Table
Smartsheet
SMBSpreadsheet-style work management platform with project schedules, automation, dashboards, and flexible execution views.
Approval workflows combined with field-driven automation can gate updates until required stakeholders approve deliverables.
Smartsheet’s main planning model uses sheets and reports as the central data containers for tasks, milestones, and status fields. Gantt views support schedule planning, and dependency features help visualize sequencing across rows within a single sheet or across connected structures. Automated workflows can trigger actions based on field changes, due dates, or user actions, and approval workflows can require deliverable sign-off before updates propagate.
A practical tradeoff appears when teams expect deep agile execution features like sprint commitments, backlog health metrics, or built-in earned value management dashboards. Smartsheet works best when schedules, process steps, and stakeholder status must stay in one system while integrations move data in and out.
- +REST API and webhooks support event-driven integration with external systems
- +Approval workflows route deliverables through explicit sign-off steps
- +Cross-sheet rollups feed dashboards without manual status copying
- +Audit history and permission settings support controlled collaboration
- –Agile metrics like earned value require external calculation or custom reporting
- –Advanced dependency mapping across many projects needs careful sheet design
- –Automation rules can become hard to debug when many triggers interact
- –Granular resource leveling and capacity optimization need manual heuristics
PMO governance teams
Standardize delivery approvals across portfolios
Fewer out-of-policy releases
Operations program managers
Keep status aligned to schedules
Less manual reporting
Show 2 more scenarios
Systems integration teams
Sync project data with external tools
Near real-time synchronization
Engineers use the REST API to push and pull sheet rows while webhooks handle change events.
Delivery leads in regulated orgs
Track who changed what and when
Stronger accountability trails
Admins rely on audit history and role permissions to trace field edits and workflow actions.
Best for: Fits when PMO and project teams need schedule views, approvals, and API-driven integrations in one tracking system.
More related reading
Wrike
SMBCollaborative work management software with Gantt charts, request workflows, and Agile board views.
Wrike automation rules can trigger workflow updates and task routing based on defined conditions.
Wrike is a strong match for teams running a hybrid methodology overlay because it supports structured planning with custom fields and status visibility across projects. Automation rules can route work to the right owner, trigger updates on key events, and keep dependencies and approvals aligned with defined processes. Integrations and API access support connecting work intake, status signals, and execution data into other systems without manual export steps.
The tradeoff is that a hybrid governance model requires deliberate configuration so teams use the same statuses, naming conventions, and custom field logic. Wrike works best when work is standardized enough for automation rules and reporting templates to stay consistent across teams, not when every project follows a fully unique process.
- +Configurable automation rules update statuses and routing at key workflow events
- +API and webhooks support integration patterns for status, tasks, and events
- +Cross-project dashboards aggregate execution data for stakeholder reporting
- +Approval workflows support gated deliverable signoff without leaving the project
- –Hybrid governance depends on consistent custom field and status configuration
- –Advanced reporting setup takes time when projects differ in schema
- –Dependency-heavy planning needs careful workflow alignment to avoid mismatch
- –Some team workflows require admin tuning to keep permission behavior consistent
PMO governance teams
Roll up blended delivery status
Faster reporting with fewer manual edits
Agile program managers
Coordinate release-level execution
Less status drift between teams
Show 2 more scenarios
Operations and request intake
Route and approve work intake
Clearer accountability for gated work
Request-to-deliverable workflows route tasks to owners and enforce approval steps before progression.
Systems integration teams
Sync tasks and events programmatically
Less manual data movement
The API and webhooks support event-driven sync for tasks, status changes, and workflow triggers.
Best for: Fits when PMO groups need cross-team reporting plus workflow automation without breaking project control.
Zoho Projects
SMBProject management software with task automation, Gantt charts, timesheets, and Kanban boards.
REST API plus webhooks enable external systems to mirror Zoho Projects task events in near real time.
Zoho Projects supports hybrid workflows by pairing plan-first tracking via Gantt with execution visibility using kanban and list views. The platform includes status updates, custom fields, task dependencies, and milestone centric reporting that map delivery progress to stakeholder views. Admin controls cover user roles, project permissions, and audit visibility through Zoho’s security tooling, which helps PMO teams control access at scale.
A practical tradeoff is that hybrid planning depth depends on how projects and custom fields are modeled, since advanced portfolio rollups still require careful configuration of project templates and reporting filters. Zoho Projects fits teams running Gantt-to-board style execution where work items and custom metadata must stay consistent across views and automations.
- +REST API and webhooks for event-driven task sync
- +Custom fields carried across tasks, milestones, and views
- +Zoho app integrations for linked CRM, tickets, and requests
- +RBAC-style project roles for permission control
- –Hybrid portfolio rollups need careful configuration
- –Some dependency and approval workflows require admin planning
- –Automation rules can be limited for deeply conditional logic
- –Complex reporting often needs exported datasets
PMO governance teams
Standardize delivery checkpoints across projects
Fewer permission and structure errors
Software delivery teams
Track planned work and day-to-day tasks
Clearer status alignment
Show 2 more scenarios
RevOps operations teams
Coordinate leads to project work
Shorter cycle time
Linked Zoho objects reduce manual handoffs from requests into project tasks.
Systems integration teams
Mirror project state into internal tools
Faster reporting and automation
Webhooks trigger sync for tasks, updates, and status changes outside Zoho.
Best for: Fits when PMOs want Zoho-based governance with Gantt and kanban execution in one workflow.
Planview AdaptiveWork
enterpriseEnterprise project portfolio management software with support for hybrid delivery models across Agile and traditional work.
Configurable portfolio-to-delivery planning with dependency-aware execution links for PMO governance workflows.
Planview AdaptiveWork maps hybrid delivery work into configurable planning constructs that PMOs can align to portfolio roadmaps and governance checkpoints. It supports work breakdown from initiative to task, then coordinates execution with dependency-aware scheduling and board views.
Automation and integrations are oriented around portfolio rollups, status dashboards, and system-to-system sync so teams can keep sprint-level work consistent with higher-level plans. Admin tooling centers on controlled access, auditability, and repeatable configuration for large organizations managing multiple teams and workflows.
- +Portfolio roadmaps roll up into execution views for PMO oversight
- +Dependency-aware scheduling improves cross-team coordination on mixed work
- +Automation reduces manual status collection across multiple planning levels
- +Admin controls support stakeholder permission matrices for governance
- –Hybrid workflow configuration requires governance discipline to stay consistent
- –Advanced automation often takes more setup than tool-first project boards
- –Some agile artifacts need careful mapping to match team practices
- –Reporting depth can feel complex for teams running only lightweight work
Best for: Fits when PMOs need hybrid delivery planning with dependency-aware execution and portfolio rollups across teams.
Planisware
enterpriseProject and portfolio management platform built for complex planning with both traditional and Agile methods.
Stage-gate plus milestone dependency mapping that ties governance checkpoints to execution progress.
Planisware supports hybrid project execution by connecting portfolio planning, stage-gate governance, and day-to-day delivery tracking in one workflow. Core capabilities center on roadmap rollups, deliverable approval and milestone dependency mapping, and status dashboard aggregation for cross-team visibility.
The admin surface focuses on stakeholder permission matrix controls and audit-oriented reporting for governance workflows. Automation is driven through configurable templates and integration points that fit enterprise project office processes.
- +Stage-gate workflows map approvals to milestones and dependencies
- +Portfolio roadmap rollups link planning views to execution status
- +Stakeholder permission matrix supports PMO-grade governance
- +Configurable reporting enables aggregated stakeholder dashboards
- –Hybrid configuration needs disciplined process design to avoid duplication
- –Automation coverage feels narrower for lightweight personal workflows
- –Detailed dependency modeling takes time to standardize across teams
- –Data exchange relies on integration setup for external work tools
Best for: Fits when a PMO needs stage-gate governance plus portfolio rollup across many delivery teams.
ProjectManager
SMBProject management software with Gantt charts, Kanban boards, resource management, and portfolio reporting.
Dashboards that aggregate project status from ongoing work, enabling consistent exec reporting across multiple projects.
ProjectManager fits teams that need a hybrid-style workflow with shared project plans and operational reporting in one place. The core setup centers on tasks, timelines, and team collaboration using boards, Gantt views, and workload tracking.
ProjectManager also adds dashboards for rollup status reporting and can connect time tracking workflows through native integrations. Automation focuses on keeping plan views and execution views aligned through managed updates rather than code-based orchestration.
- +Gantt and task views stay usable for plan execution and day-to-day work
- +Project and workload dashboards support portfolio-style status aggregation
- +Time tracking integrations reduce manual timesheet entry
- +Permissions and role controls support stakeholder access boundaries
- –Dependency and critical-path mapping stays limited for complex schedule analysis
- –Advanced workflow automation requires more process discipline than rule-heavy tools
- –CSV import mapping can be tedious for large multi-project setups
- –API extensibility is present but not oriented around fine-grained schema control
Best for: Fits when teams need Gantt-style planning plus live execution views and reporting without heavy workflow engineering.
Celoxis
enterpriseProject portfolio management software with scheduling, resource planning, issue tracking, and workflow automation.
Milestone dependency mapping with approval-aware deliverable progression that keeps steering views consistent across phases.
Celoxis targets hybrid project management with portfolio-level planning that connects work execution to governance artifacts like approvals and permissions. The tool supports planning and tracking across Gantt views, boards, and milestone structures, with dependency-aware reporting for program steering.
Automation is driven through configurable workflow rules and status-driven rollups, which helps teams keep dashboards aligned across phases and teams. Celoxis also provides an integration surface for external systems through REST endpoints and event-style updates, which supports hybrid processes that depend on enterprise tooling.
- +Portfolio rollups connect execution status to governance checkpoints
- +Workflow automation can drive approvals and deliverable state changes
- +Gantt-style planning stays in sync with board-based execution
- +Permission model supports stakeholder permission matrix and team-level access
- –Advanced configuration requires governance discipline to avoid inconsistent workflows
- –Automation coverage depends on how status transitions and templates are modeled
- –Reporting depth can require careful view configuration for consistent dashboards
- –Complex dependency mapping can become hard to maintain across large programs
Best for: Fits when PMOs need hybrid workflows with approval gates, portfolio rollups, and dependency-aware reporting.
Kantata
vertical specialistProfessional services project management software focused on planning, resourcing, and delivery operations.
Deliverable approval workflows tied to planning stages, so gated sign-off is attached to the same work objects.
Kantata ties work execution to creative and professional services delivery with planning, resourcing, and delivery governance in one system. It supports a hybrid workflow where task-level breakdowns map to delivery phases, while milestones and approvals maintain control from intake through release.
Built-in reporting aggregates status across workstreams to support PMO-style oversight and stakeholder visibility. Integration coverage centers on connecting calendars, spreadsheets, and development-adjacent tooling through an API and automation hooks.
- +Hybrid planning links phase checkpoints to deliverable approval workflows
- +Resource planning supports capacity-style allocation across active work
- +Status dashboards aggregate progress across multiple workstreams
- +REST API supports automation and integration with external systems
- –Advanced workflow setup can require careful configuration of permissions
- –Roadmap rollups can feel rigid for teams with highly fluid intake
- –Sprint backlog alignment is weaker than tools built around Agile ceremonies
- –Heavy customization may require ongoing admin attention
Best for: Fits when services or creative teams need phase-based governance with task execution and portfolio visibility.
ClickUp
SMBWork management platform with lists, timelines, dashboards, docs, and sprint-oriented workflows.
ClickUp Automations can trigger workflows on custom field edits and task state transitions across projects.
ClickUp lets teams plan work across lists, boards, and calendars while tracking status, assignees, and due dates in one place. It supports sprint-oriented workflows through task-level hierarchy, custom fields, and timeline views that convert planning details into day-to-day execution.
The automation engine can react to field changes and workflow states, and the REST API plus webhooks cover external syncing for issues, updates, and custom objects. ClickUp also offers admin controls for workspace governance, including permission management and audit visibility for key activity.
- +Task hierarchy and custom fields support detailed breakdowns without separate tooling
- +Automation rules trigger on status, priority, and custom field changes
- +REST API and webhooks support issue syncing and event-driven integrations
- +Multiple views help teams run board, list, and timeline workstreams together
- –Complex custom fields and views can slow down setup and ongoing consistency
- –Cross-project reporting needs careful workspace structure to avoid noisy dashboards
- –Dependency handling is workable but not as built-in as dedicated agile tooling
- –Role permissions and sharing can become hard to reason about at scale
Best for: Fits when hybrid teams need configurable workflow states plus API-based automation for connected execution.
monday.com
SMBWork management platform with boards, timelines, automations, and reporting for mixed project workflows.
Automation rules with multi-step conditions and triggers that update fields across linked boards.
monday.com works well as hybrid project management software for teams that need both configurable workflows and cross-team reporting from a single work OS. Its visual board system supports customizable fields, dependencies, and portfolio-level rollups, while automation rules handle status changes, assignments, and data sync between boards.
monday.com also offers an integration and API surface that supports webhook-style event triggers and external system handoffs for planning data. Governance is handled through role-based access controls, workspace settings, and audit visibility tied to user activity.
- +Board-based work tracking with dependency-aware views for planning and execution
- +Automation rules connect status, ownership, and field updates across boards
- +REST API and webhooks support event-driven integration with external systems
- +Portfolio dashboards aggregate status from multiple projects and teams
- –Complex automation graphs can require careful governance and testing
- –Advanced hybrid planning views need configuration across multiple board types
- –Resource planning and earned value style reporting needs custom field modeling
- –Deep process templates may still require admin-led setup before scale
Best for: Fits when teams want board customization plus automation and API-led integrations for hybrid planning.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 remote and hybrid work in industry, Smartsheet stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right hybrid project management software
Hybrid project management software blends board execution with governance and schedule views so teams can reconcile day-to-day work and milestone oversight in the same system. This guide covers Smartsheet, Wrike, Zoho Projects, Planview AdaptiveWork, Planisware, ProjectManager, Celoxis, Kantata, ClickUp, and monday.com.
The selection focus stays on integration depth, automation mechanics, and governance controls that reduce drift between planning artifacts and execution updates. Smartsheet, for example, pairs approval workflows with field-driven automation, while Wrike centers automation rules for status and task routing under shared controls.
Hybrid project management software for board execution with governance checkpoints and synchronized schedule views
Hybrid project management software keeps execution work objects linked to governance steps like approvals and phase gates while also supporting schedule-centric views like Gantt-style planning and dependency-aware rollups. Smartsheet is built around approval workflows that can gate deliverable updates until required stakeholders approve, and it supports REST API and webhooks for event-driven integrations.
Wrike supports configurable automation rules that trigger workflow updates and task routing based on defined conditions, and it uses its API and webhooks to integrate status, tasks, and events. Across tools like Zoho Projects and Planview AdaptiveWork, hybrid workflows typically extend from execution objects into portfolio rollups, so governance reporting remains consistent as teams move work between statuses.
Integration, automation, and governance controls for hybrid delivery
Hybrid project management depends on keeping execution work linked to governance steps so status dashboards reflect approvals, phase gates, and milestone dependencies rather than manual updates. The feature set should support event-driven synchronization and workflow automation so teams can reconcile board work and schedule views without drifting fields across systems.
Event-driven integration via REST API and webhooks
Smartsheet and Wrike both provide REST API plus webhooks so external systems can mirror status, tasks, and workflow events with low latency. Zoho Projects adds REST API and webhooks to sync task events into an existing governance workflow.
Deliverable approval workflows tied to execution fields
Smartsheet combines approval workflows with field-driven automation so deliverable updates can be gated until required stakeholders approve. Kantata ties deliverable approval workflows to planning stages so gated sign-off stays attached to the same work objects.
Automation rules that route work based on conditions
Wrike automation rules can update statuses and task routing when defined conditions trigger at workflow events. ClickUp Automations can trigger workflows on custom field edits and task state transitions across projects.
Dependency-aware planning from portfolio views to delivery execution
Planview AdaptiveWork supports portfolio-to-delivery planning with dependency-aware execution links for PMO governance workflows. Planisware provides stage-gate plus milestone dependency mapping that connects governance checkpoints to execution progress.
Portfolio rollups that preserve governance checkpoint meaning
Smartsheet and Zoho Projects both carry custom fields across tasks, milestones, and views so rollups remain grounded in the same governance metadata. Celoxis uses milestone dependency mapping and approval-aware deliverable progression so steering views stay consistent across phases.
Cross-project schedule and status aggregation without heavy engineering
ProjectManager focuses on dashboards that aggregate project status from ongoing work to support consistent exec reporting across multiple projects. Smartsheet instead uses approval workflows plus API and webhooks so aggregated dashboards reflect gated deliverable states driven by workflow rules.
Select hybrid project management by governance control depth and automation surface
Teams should first decide whether governance is implemented as explicit approval steps and milestone links inside the execution system, or as reporting overlays that depend on consistent configuration. The next decision should map to the integration model, since REST API and webhooks change the way hybrid workflows stay synchronized with external systems and identity providers.
Choose an approval-first model or a workflow-first model
If governance must gate deliverable updates until named stakeholders approve, Smartsheet is designed around approval workflows combined with field-driven automation. If governance attaches to planning stages through deliverable approval workflows, Kantata ties phase checkpoints to approval outcomes on the same work objects.
Pick the automation style that matches operational control
Wrike fits when automation rules must trigger workflow updates and task routing based on defined conditions while keeping project control centralized. monday.com fits when automation graphs need multi-step conditions and triggers that update fields across linked boards.
Decide how much dependency intelligence is required at scale
For PMO governance that requires dependency-aware execution links and portfolio rollups across teams, Planview AdaptiveWork emphasizes dependency-aware scheduling across mixed work. If stage-gate governance must be tied to milestone dependency mapping across many delivery teams, Planisware connects approvals to milestones and dependencies.
Match integration expectations to the API event pattern
Smartsheet and Zoho Projects support REST API plus webhooks for event-driven task sync, which fits when external systems must mirror changes near real time. If integration needs are centered on workflow and status events with automation rules, Wrike also exposes API and webhooks aligned to status, tasks, and events.
Confirm reporting scope against schedule analysis requirements
If exec reporting must aggregate project and workload status with dashboards and Gantt-style planning without building complex workflow logic, ProjectManager is designed for consistent portfolio-style status aggregation. If advanced dependency and critical-path mapping must drive schedule analysis across complex programs, ProjectManager’s dependency and critical-path mapping stays limited for complex schedule analysis.
Who hybrid project management tools fit best
Hybrid workflows concentrate value where PMO governance needs to remain consistent as teams move work through states, approvals, and portfolio rollups. Tools with deeper integration and workflow automation reduce the time spent correcting mismatched status fields between execution and planning artifacts.
PMOs running stage-gated portfolios with cross-team governance
Planisware and Celoxis support stage-gate governance or milestone dependency mapping with approval-aware deliverable progression so checkpoint meaning remains stable during execution.
Project teams that must synchronize execution events with external systems
Smartsheet and Zoho Projects use REST API plus webhooks for event-driven task syncing, which fits when external systems must mirror task state changes quickly.
Cross-team delivery organizations that require consistent workflow routing
Wrike can route tasks and update statuses via configurable automation rules so workflow updates follow defined conditions. ClickUp can trigger workflows on custom field edits and task state transitions when routing depends on detailed field changes.
Services or creative groups that use phase-based approval workflows
Kantata links phase checkpoints to deliverable approval workflows tied to the same work objects, which fits creative delivery where sign-off is attached to stage artifacts.
Exec reporting teams that want aggregated dashboards with less workflow engineering
ProjectManager centers dashboards that aggregate project status from ongoing work, which fits when hybrid planning must remain usable without heavy workflow rule design.
Common hybrid project management pitfalls
Hybrid systems break when governance metadata is configured inconsistently or when automation rules update the wrong fields without approval gating. Failures also happen when dependency mapping stays under-designed for cross-project rollups and when reporting is expected to replicate schedule analysis that the tool does not model deeply.
Relying on approval steps without enforcing field-driven gating
Smartsheet’s approval workflows are designed to gate deliverable updates until stakeholders approve, so approval steps without connected field automation tend to create out-of-sync deliverable status.
Configuring automation without governance discipline across custom fields and statuses
Wrike’s hybrid governance depends on consistent custom field and status configuration, so teams that allow schema drift typically see automation behave unpredictably across projects.
Building stage-gate or dependency governance overlays that duplicate workflow objects
Planisware’s hybrid configuration needs disciplined process design to avoid duplication, so teams that model checkpoints in multiple places often produce conflicting milestone and approval progress.
Expecting deep critical-path or dependency analysis from execution-first dashboards
ProjectManager keeps dependency and critical-path mapping limited for complex schedule analysis, so organizations needing advanced schedule analytics should validate schedule intelligence before standardizing on it.
Letting complex automation graphs scale without testing and governance
monday.com complex automation graphs can require careful governance and testing, so teams that roll out multi-step triggers without a controlled rollout path often cause noisy field updates across linked boards.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated hybrid project management software on integration depth, automation and API surface, and governance control depth using the provided tool cards. We weighted features at 40%, ease at 30%, and value at 30% based on the stated overall, features, ease, and value scores.
Smartsheet set the ranking pace because approval workflows gate deliverable updates with field-driven automation and it pairs REST API and webhooks for event-driven integrations. Wrike ranked close due to configurable automation rules for status and task routing plus API and webhooks, while Planview AdaptiveWork and Planisware were separated by dependency-aware portfolio planning and stage-gate plus milestone dependency mapping.
Frequently Asked Questions About hybrid project management software
How do Smartsheet and monday.com handle integrations without breaking a hybrid workflow?
What API pattern fits event-style sync for hybrid status dashboards across tools?
How do SSO and access controls differ between Planisware and Jira alternatives like ClickUp or Asana?
When migrating data from spreadsheets or existing project trackers, which tools support structured import mapping?
How can hybrid teams prevent workflow updates from bypassing approvals?
What breaks when a portfolio rollup system cannot map milestone dependency relationships?
When does a dependency-aware scheduling approach outperform simple board dependencies for hybrid delivery planning?
How do workflow automation rules differ between Wrike and Smartsheet for task routing and approvals?
Which tool best fits teams that need timeline views plus sprint backlog integration with consistent execution tracking?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Remote And Hybrid Work In Industry alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of remote and hybrid work in industry tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare remote and hybrid work in industry tools→