GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Wildlife VeterinaryTop 10 Best Hunting Software of 2026
Ranked roundup of top hunting software for tracking and planning hunts, with criteria and tradeoffs for tools like DeerLab, Tactacam, iSportsman.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
DeerLab is the best pick overall for hunting groups that want map-based logging with photo-tagged harvest records across repeated properties, while Tactacam fits solo hunters who need an easier camera-and-app workflow for GPS-backed logs, and HuntProof works well if you’re hunting off a repeatable field plan with offline capture in European markets.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
DeerLab
Harvest photo tagging that keeps each harvest’s evidence linked to the logged location and timeline.
Built for fits when hunting groups need map-based logging and photo-tagged harvest records across repeated properties..
Tactacam
Editor pickTrail camera photo management with hunt-log context linking images to GPS and harvest events.
Built for fits when solo hunters need photo tagging and GPS-based harvest logs without team administration overhead..
iSportsman
Editor pickArea-scoped landowner permissions control what hunters can view and log within specific mapped boundaries.
Built for fits when landowners and hunting groups need controlled, map-based activity tracking with shared access boundaries..
Related reading
Comparison Table
DeerLab
vertical specialistTrail camera image analysis software for deer inventory, pattern tracking, and herd insights.
Harvest photo tagging that keeps each harvest’s evidence linked to the logged location and timeline.
DeerLab’s core workflow centers on map-based logging that connects sightings, stand location tracking, and harvest photo tagging to specific places. DeerLab’s GPS waypoint plotting and layers let users review where events happened without switching tools. DeerLab also focuses on repeatability by keeping land-specific notes and visit history in one place. This makes it a strong match for hunting groups that run the same properties across seasons.
The main tradeoff is that the value depends on how consistently field entries are tagged to locations and dates. Map-heavy logging can feel slower than spreadsheet capture when data needs are minimal. DeerLab fits best when hunts span multiple stands and include photo-tagged harvest documentation tied to the same land context.
- +GPS waypoint plotting for mapping sightings and routes
- +Stand location tracking tied to dated visit history
- +Harvest photo tagging keeps evidence and notes aligned
- +Offline-capable capture supports low-signal hunting days
- –Map-first workflow adds friction for quick text-only logging
- –Requires consistent location tagging to maintain clean records
- –Some advanced reporting needs careful data hygiene
Solo hunters
Plan and review multi-stand seasons
Faster decisions on next stands
Hunting lease managers
Centralize land permissions and visit logs
Clear property activity records
Show 2 more scenarios
Camera-heavy hunters
Relate camera activity to locations
More targeted stand selection
DeerLab connects field observations to map points so camera-driven leads have geographic context.
Hunt crews
Coordinate sightings and harvest documentation
Reduced lost or mismatched notes
DeerLab helps organize shared hunting evidence by location and date for each season event.
Best for: Fits when hunting groups need map-based logging and photo-tagged harvest records across repeated properties.
Tactacam
vertical specialistTrail camera and hunting camera ecosystem with the Reveal app for cellular image delivery and camera control.
Trail camera photo management with hunt-log context linking images to GPS and harvest events.
For solo hunters and small camps, Tactacam supports a photo-first workflow for organizing trail camera photo tagging and reviewing observation history in one place. The system also tracks stand location and other GPS-based entries so scouting notes and harvest records remain connected to where they occurred. This reduces the need to reconcile separate spreadsheets for location notes and photo references after the season.
A key tradeoff is limited depth for multi-user governance, so assigning roles and maintaining an audit trail across larger hunting organizations is not a primary strength. Tactacam fits situations where one person owns the hunting log, then shares selected exports or views with others for coordination.
- +Photo-first organization for trail camera review and tagging
- +GPS waypoint entries connect sightings to location and date
- +Harvest logging ties outcomes to field sessions
- +Offline-friendly notes support continued documentation in the field
- –Limited multi-user governance for larger hunting groups
- –Advanced mapping layers are not a central workflow focus
- –Deep integrations with third-party weather and tracking tools are limited
- –Bulk import and automation options feel narrow for power users
Solo deer hunters
Tag camera photos to sightings
Faster recall of field decisions
Small hunting team
Track stand location history
Cleaner location-based reporting
Show 2 more scenarios
Harvest record keepers
Log harvest photos and outcomes
Reduced post-season cleanup work
Record harvest details with media and location references for season wrap-up.
Field scouting planners
Review offline notes on hunts
Less lost documentation
Continue logging and reviewing saved media when connectivity is unreliable.
Best for: Fits when solo hunters need photo tagging and GPS-based harvest logs without team administration overhead.
iSportsman
vertical specialistHunting and fishing permit management platform used by military installations and public land agencies for check-in and check-out.
Area-scoped landowner permissions control what hunters can view and log within specific mapped boundaries.
iSportsman centers on landowner permission documentation with map-linked hunting activities, so the same boundary context moves from planning to records. The system supports GPS waypoint plotting and hunting area organization, then routes observation and harvest logging to those locations for consistent history. Integration is oriented around exporting and importing hunting-related data rather than deep third-party system synchronization. Governance is clearer than generic note apps because access controls apply to land areas rather than only to individual entries.
A tradeoff appears in setup effort for permission boundaries, because accurate area scoping matters for correct visibility. It fits situations where multiple hunters need shared area context and where landowners want controlled access. It is less suitable for purely personal tracking workflows that do not require permission management or map-linked collaboration.
- +Map-linked harvest logging keeps records tied to hunting locations
- +Landowner permission documentation reduces unauthorized area access
- +GPS waypoint plotting supports consistent planning and post-season history
- +Area-scoped sharing works better than entry-only sharing
- –Permission setup requires careful area scoping to avoid visibility mistakes
- –Camera workflow and media tagging are not as automation-centric as dedicated camera systems
- –Offline mapping and cache controls are less prominent than in field-first apps
- –Deep API-driven integrations are limited compared with developer-focused platforms
Hunting lease managers
Control hunter access by boundary
Access rules stay consistent
Landowners with multiple hunters
Maintain location history for compliance
Records match land history
Show 2 more scenarios
Hunting club coordinators
Share plans with controlled participation
Planning stays in scope
Coordinators publish map-based plans that hunters can use within defined access boundaries.
Bow and rifle group hunters
Track stand and route sightings
Sightings are searchable by spot
Hunters log observations at plotted locations so trip notes remain tied to the same sites.
Best for: Fits when landowners and hunting groups need controlled, map-based activity tracking with shared access boundaries.
onX Hunt
vertical specialistGPS mapping app showing public-private land boundaries, hunting units, and offline maps for hunters.
Public land and parcel boundary layers paired with landowner permission documentation workflows during planning.
onX Hunt focuses on field-ready mapping for hunting plans built around public land and property boundaries. It supports waypoint plotting, route recording, and offline map access so scouting and navigation still work without a signal.
The app organizes observations and harvest details on a map view, which keeps planning and documentation tied to location. Boundary layers and landowner-permission workflows help reduce map ambiguity when access rules vary across parcels.
- +Offline basemap caching keeps boundaries and waypoints usable in low-signal areas
- +Property boundary mapping reduces uncertainty when hunting across parcel lines
- +Map-based entry and exit route recording supports trip replay and planning
- +Observation logging ties notes to locations instead of relying on freeform lists
- –Some workflows require more taps than log-first hunters expect
- –Advanced integrations and automation depend on external exports rather than built-in pipelines
- –Media tagging for large camera roll collections can feel slow without tight organization
- –Permission documentation is harder to maintain for multi-landowner, multi-day plans
Best for: Fits when hunters need reliable boundary-aware mapping plus offline waypoint and route logging during scouting and season trips.
HuntStand
vertical specialistHunting map and land management platform with property boundaries, weather, and hunt logging.
Landowner permission documentation ties contributor access to specific land parcels inside the mapping workflow.
HuntStand turns hunting field notes into a mapped workflow by linking your observations, waypoints, and property overlays to a consistent location history. The app centers on GPS waypoint plotting with offline-ready map layers, plus stand location tracking and harvest logging tied to specific spots.
Admin workflows focus on landowner permission documentation so that multiple people can contribute notes on shared ground without losing ownership context. Built for day-to-day field use, it also supports trail camera photo management with tagging so camera activity stays searchable by location and time.
- +Offline-friendly mapping plus GPS waypoint plotting keeps records usable in low-signal areas
- +Harvest logging and stand location tracking stay attached to exact map points
- +Trail camera photo management uses tags so camera images remain searchable
- +Landowner permission documentation supports shared-ground workflows with clear ownership context
- –Multi-user governance can require disciplined permission setup to prevent attribution confusion
- –Some advanced layers and overlays may require extra manual work to maintain freshness
- –Complex multi-device syncing depends on consistent capture behavior during field use
- –Shot-level tracking workflows are less granular than specialized shot management tools
Best for: Fits when hunters need mapped field notes, camera organization, and shared property permissions in one mobile workflow.
HuntWise
vertical specialistHunting app combining maps, weather forecasting, and hunt prediction algorithms.
Stand location tracking with recurring site history tied to map areas for quick site-to-outcome comparisons
HuntWise focuses on hunting-specific field workflows like stand location tracking and harvest logging, with data tied to places and dates rather than generic tasks. The core capability centers on capturing observations and harvest details, then keeping them organized for later review and planning.
It also supports waypoint-style mapping so hunters can correlate access points, routes, and hunting areas with outcomes. Management features are built around personal hunting records, not team-wide provisioning.
- +Harvest logging ties results to locations for faster post-hunt review
- +Stand location tracking keeps per-site notes and activity history in one place
- +Waypoint-style map workflows reduce context switching between apps
- +Observation entries are structured enough to support consistent records
- –Team hunting use cases need manual process for sharing data
- –Offline basemap caching coverage for remote trips is not a guaranteed workflow
- –Media handling and tagging depth can lag behind photo-first camera managers
- –Advanced automation and API extensibility are limited compared with integration-heavy tools
Best for: Fits when individual hunters need consistent stand and harvest records with simple map-driven context.
GOHUNT
vertical specialistWestern hunting platform with mapping tools, research data, and species distribution information.
GOHUNT integrates hunting planning records with photo tagging workflows so harvest and camera context stay linked during review.
GOHUNT focuses on hunting-specific planning and reporting workflows built around public data, harvest records, and field notes rather than generic CRM features. It supports property and route mapping with offline-friendly map behavior for in-field use, plus photo-centric organization for camera and harvest moments.
The workflow emphasizes repeatable hunt planning, stand location tracking, and seasonal calendars tied to user-managed observations. Data stays in hunting-context records that can be reviewed later for scouting decisions and harvest summaries.
- +Hunt planning records link routes, stands, and sightings into one timeline
- +Offline-friendly map access supports waypoint and boundary review in the field
- +Photo-centered organization helps associate camera captures with hunts
- +Harvest logging keeps outcome notes and supporting media together
- –Best results require disciplined data entry for stands, properties, and observations
- –Automation coverage is thinner than tools that offer multi-step workflow triggers
- –Integration with third-party tracking hardware is limited to supported data formats
- –Advanced mapping layers can add steps when building consistent templates
Best for: Fits when solo hunters or small groups need field-ready mapping plus hunt logging in one workflow.
DeerCast
vertical specialistDeer movement prediction app using weather data to forecast peak hunting times.
Event-to-location linking that attaches sightings and harvest evidence to a specific stand record.
DeerCast is hunting software focused on managing hunting areas, sightings, and harvest records in one workflow. The standout capability is structured stand and location tracking tied to property context, with photo and note capture linked to each event.
DeerCast also supports seasonal planning through rut and weather-informed logs, which helps keep field data consistent across trips. Admin features focus on controlling who can view or edit land and related entries rather than broad general project-management tooling.
- +Stand and location records tie sightings, photos, and notes to the same context
- +Harvest logging keeps shot and photo documentation together for later review
- +Seasonal calendars organize entries around rut timing and trip planning
- +Role-based access limits who can edit property data and field events
- –GPS map depth is lighter than dedicated boundary mapping and route mapping tools
- –Photo management lacks the advanced batch workflows seen in camera-first products
- –Data cleanup depends on consistent event naming and stand structure
- –Automation options are limited for multi-device photo sync and marker overlays
Best for: Fits when hunting groups need structured stand tracking and shared access around properties, sightings, and harvest logs.
SpyPoint
vertical specialistCellular trail camera management platform with photo transmission, camera configuration, and mapping features.
Location-linked trail camera photo management with site-based viewing and sharing workflows.
SpyPoint records and manages trail camera images tied to GPS-located sites, with workflow features for viewing, sorting, and sharing observations. The core hunting-management focus is on organizing camera feeds and property-specific logs so events and site history stay connected.
It also supports waypoint and boundary-oriented workflows for navigation and property context, which helps keep field notes aligned with where photos were captured. Integration depth centers on camera ecosystem connectivity rather than building a custom hunting automation layer via external tools.
- +Camera image management stays tied to locations and site folders
- +Built-in sharing workflow supports collaborative landowner or guide use
- +Waypoint capture supports faster field planning without manual redraws
- +Photo review flow is optimized for quick field decisions
- –Limited automation and API surface compared with higher-integration tools
- –Boundary workflows can be less granular than GIS-first hunting systems
- –Harvest and stand tracking need manual structure for consistent logs
- –External app integration relies more on its ecosystem than open extensibility
Best for: Fits when camera-centric hunting logs must be organized by location with minimal admin overhead.
HuntProof
vertical specialistMobile hunting app focused on navigation, offline maps, and hunt planning in European markets.
Offline-first hunt session capture with later media and location sync into a single hunt timeline.
HuntProof is a hunting workflow tool built around logging field observations and organizing hunt history per property or stand. It centers on GPS-based notes, photo and media attachment to events, and repeatable tracking for setups and outcomes.
The product also supports offline access patterns for field use, with later sync for completed sessions. For hunters who want consistent documentation across trips, HuntProof emphasizes structured entries over free-form journal pages.
- +Event-based logs that attach media to specific hunt moments
- +GPS-driven capture workflow for locations tied to hunts and stands
- +Offline-first entry flow for capturing notes during weak signal
- +Clear hunt history timeline that supports repeat planning
- –Limited evidence of camera SD card sync automation across brands
- –Weather-solunar integration coverage is narrow compared with specialized apps
- –No clear public API surface for syncing harvest logs elsewhere
- –Geospatial layers for public land and boundaries are not deeply configurable
Best for: Fits when hunters need repeatable field logging with photo attachments and location capture during trips.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 wildlife veterinary, DeerLab stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right hunting software
The hunting software lineup in this guide covers map-first logging and boundary-aware planning with tools like DeerLab, onX Hunt, and iSportsman, plus photo-context workflows from Tactacam and GOHUNT. The entries also cover stand and evidence tracking patterns using HuntWise, DeerCast, and HuntProof, and camera-centric site organization from SpyPoint.
This guide emphasizes how integrations and automation surfaces connect GPS waypoints, hunt timelines, and harvest photo tagging across field workflows. DeerLab is the top-ranked tool in the set, based on how it keeps harvest evidence linked to logged location and timeline.
Hunting software for GPS mapping, harvest logging, and photo-tagged evidence workflows
Hunting software coordinates GPS waypoint plotting, stand location tracking, and harvest logging so sightings and outcomes stay attached to specific map points instead of freeform notes. DeerLab focuses on harvest photo tagging that preserves evidence linkage to each logged location and timeline, while Tactacam ties trail camera photo management to hunt logs with GPS context.
Many tools in this category also support offline field use through cached maps, and several options add landowner permission documentation workflows that control what contributors can view and log. Teams evaluating these tools usually compare the map workflow depth in onX Hunt against the area-scoped permission control in iSportsman for shared access governance.
Evaluation criteria for hunting software that ties GPS, permissions, and evidence
Hunting software succeeds when GPS waypoint plotting, harvest logging, and photo evidence land on the same location and timeline so records stay coherent after the season. This guide evaluates how each tool links those artifacts, plus how it handles boundary mapping, offline use, and multi-user permission boundaries when multiple hunters contribute.
Harvest evidence tied to logged location and timeline
DeerLab keeps harvest photo tagging linked to each logged location and time context. Tactacam attaches trail camera photo management to hunt logs with GPS and harvest event context.
Stand and location tracking with visit history
HuntWise maintains stand location tracking with recurring site history to speed site-to-outcome comparisons. DeerCast links event-to-location so sightings and harvest evidence attach to the same stand record.
Boundary-aware planning plus offline field usability
onX Hunt pairs public land and parcel boundary layers with offline basemap caching so scouts can log waypoints and routes with low-signal access. HuntStand also supports offline-friendly mapping with GPS waypoint plotting and harvest and stand tracking attached to exact map points.
Landowner permission control inside mapped areas
iSportsman provides area-scoped landowner permissions that restrict what hunters can view and log within mapped boundaries. HuntStand ties contributor access to specific land parcels inside its mapping workflow.
Photo-first organization for camera review and tagging
Tactacam organizes trail camera review around photo-first tagging with GPS waypoint entries for sightings and dates. SpyPoint keeps camera image management tied to location and site folders with sharing workflows for guides or landowners.
Automation depth for plan-to-field-to-review workflows
GOHUNT links hunt planning records with photo tagging so routes, stands, and sightings stay connected in one timeline. DeerLab focuses on harvest photo tagging as its standout evidence workflow while other tools in the set prioritize mapping or camera organization.
Decision framework for selecting hunting software by workflow and governance
Selection should start with which artifact drives the workflow first. Some tools start from map-first logging and evidence tagging, while others start from camera photos or from stand history tied to recurring site patterns.
The second step should confirm how multi-user access is handled when landowners, guides, and multiple hunters need shared access without attribution confusion. The final step should verify offline and boundary depth for the places and seasons where logging and review must happen.
Pick the primary driver: map-first logging, photo-first review, or stand history
Choose DeerLab if the workflow centers on harvest evidence that stays linked to a logged location and timeline. Choose Tactacam or SpyPoint if trail camera photo management and photo tagging drive day-to-day logging, not map-only entry.
Choose boundary depth and offline behavior based on your scouting terrain
Choose onX Hunt when public land and parcel boundary layers plus offline basemap caching are required for low-signal scouting and season trips. Choose HuntStand when offline-friendly mapping and point-attached harvest and stand tracking must work together inside a single mobile workflow.
Decide how access control should work across land parcels and mapped areas
Choose iSportsman if landowner permission boundaries must be scoped to mapped areas so hunters only view and log inside allowed polygons. Choose HuntStand when landowner permission documentation must tie contributor access to specific land parcels inside the mapping workflow.
Confirm whether stand history is the center of repeat-season decision making
Choose HuntWise when recurring stand location tracking and per-site activity history matter for faster post-hunt review. Choose DeerCast when stand records must act as the hub that connects sightings, photos, and harvest notes back to the same stand context.
Test data-entry discipline against the tool’s automation coverage
Choose GOHUNT when hunt planning records must link routes, stands, and sightings into one timeline that flows into photo tagging. Avoid expecting automation-heavy plan-to-review triggers if team success depends on perfect stand, property, and observation data entry habits.
Validate the governance load for team hunting setups
Choose DeerLab or GOHUNT for evidence-first workflows when the group can keep location tagging consistent to prevent record drift. Choose iSportsman or HuntStand when the group can invest time into careful permission setup to avoid visibility mistakes.
Who benefits from these hunting software patterns
Different hunting groups need different record structures. Evidence-linked harvest workflows, permission-scoped mapping, stand-centric history, and camera-first tagging each create a different logging rhythm during scouting and season trips. This section maps those rhythms to the tools in the lineup.
Hunting groups that log harvest evidence across multiple properties
DeerLab fits when harvest photo evidence must stay linked to logged location and timeline across repeated properties. HuntStand also fits when mobile workflows must keep harvest logging attached to exact map points with shared property permissions.
Solo hunters who rely on trail camera reviews and GPS context
Tactacam fits when photo-first organization must connect images to GPS waypoint entries and hunt-log context without team administration overhead. SpyPoint fits when camera image management must stay tied to location and site folders with built-in sharing workflows.
Landowners and leasing groups that need controlled access inside boundaries
iSportsman fits when area-scoped landowner permissions must restrict what hunters can view and log within mapped boundaries. HuntStand fits when permission documentation must tie contributor access to specific land parcels inside the mapping workflow.
Hunters who make decisions from stand repeatability and site history
HuntWise fits when consistent stand and harvest records require recurring site history tied to map areas. DeerCast fits when stand records act as the anchor that ties sightings and harvest evidence to one location context.
Hunters who run a plan-to-field-to-review pipeline
GOHUNT fits when hunt planning records must link routes, stands, and sightings into one timeline that connects to photo tagging workflows. HuntProof fits when field capture requires offline-first hunt session logging with later media and location sync into a single hunt timeline.
Common pitfalls when adopting hunting software in real logging workflows
Most failures come from mismatches between how data is entered and how the tool expects it to be structured. Map-first systems can frustrate hunters who only want quick text entry, while permission-scoped systems can break collaboration when area scoping is handled loosely. Other issues come from assuming offline caching covers every layer or assuming camera automation will work across brands without extra setup.
Treating map-first logging as optional in a map-centric evidence workflow
DeerLab keeps harvest evidence linked to logged location and timeline, so inconsistent location tagging creates gaps in the final record trail. Use the GPS waypoint flow to keep sightings and routes aligned with each harvest photo.
Under-scoping permissions and then wondering why contributors can see or log the wrong areas
iSportsman needs careful area scoping for landowner permission boundaries so visibility mistakes do not cascade into shared records. HuntStand also ties contributor access to land parcels, so permission setup discipline is required to prevent attribution confusion.
Assuming offline mode covers the layers that matter most for your scouting plan
onX Hunt includes offline basemap caching for boundaries and waypoints, so scouts can keep logging usable in low-signal areas. HuntWise offline basemap caching coverage is not a guaranteed workflow, so remote scouting needs validation before relying on it.
Expecting camera photo management automation to replace data hygiene across stand and property records
GOHUNT can connect hunt planning routes, stands, and sightings into one timeline, but best results still require disciplined data entry for stands, properties, and observations. Tactacam can link photo tagging to GPS and hunt-log context, but it will not compensate for missing location tagging discipline.
Assuming camera SD card sync automation exists across brands without a separate workflow
HuntProof has offline-first hunt session capture with later media and location sync, but limited evidence of camera SD card sync automation across brands is a constraint. Plan for photo capture and sync steps that fit the camera ecosystem used in the field.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated how each hunting software keeps GPS waypoints, stand records, and harvest evidence connected in the same workflow so sightings and outcomes stay attached to specific map points. Features carried 40% of the weighting, with ease and value each carrying 30%.
DeerLab earned the top rank because harvest photo tagging preserves evidence linkage to each logged location and timeline while also providing GPS waypoint plotting for mapping sightings and routes and stand location tracking tied to dated visit history. Tactacam ranked highly for trail camera photo management that links images to GPS and harvest events, while iSportsman and HuntStand scored strongly on landowner permission control tied to mapped areas or parcels for controlled shared access.
Frequently Asked Questions About hunting software
How does DeerLab link GPS locations to harvest evidence for review later?
Which tool is best for camera-first workflows where trail images drive hunt-log context?
How do offline workflows differ between onX Hunt and HuntProof during scouting and session capture?
What breaks if a hunting group needs parcel-level access controls instead of personal records?
How does iSportsman handle landowner permission documentation inside the mapping workflow?
Which software best supports public land and parcel boundary layers for navigation during scouting?
How does GOHUNT keep hunt planning and seasonal calendars connected to field observations?
What security model is actually used for access control, and how do tools differ in practice?
How does data migration typically work when switching from free-form journals to structured hunt logging?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Wildlife Veterinary alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of wildlife veterinary tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare wildlife veterinary tools→