GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Healthcare MedicineTop 10 Best Gp Practice Software of 2026
Top 10 ranking of gp practice software with side-by-side criteria and tradeoffs for clinics comparing Practice Fusion, Athenahealth, and Greenway Health.
How we ranked these tools
Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.
AI search agents find sources, extract figures with provenance, and aggregate written reviews. They also transcribe video reviews and podcasts.
Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Practice Fusion is the best pick for small independent GP practices that want structured consultations feeding directly into follow-up tasks because its template-driven recording keeps medications, problems, and referrals consistent while reducing post-visit admin, and Athenahealth is the better alternative for GP teams needing cloud workflow that carries clinical tasks into operational and billing handoffs.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Practice Fusion
Template-driven consultation recording that carries structured medication, problems, and referrals into follow-up tasks.
Best for: Fits when practices want fast structured consultations plus API-driven integration without custom development.
Athenahealth
Editor pickTask-driven care workflows that carry clinical follow-up into operational processing using automation and integrations.
Best for: Fits when GP teams want one system for consult workflow plus operational handoffs.
Greenway Health
Editor pickWorkflow-driven structured clinical templates that standardize consultation content while keeping prescribing and task flows in sync.
Best for: Fits when practices need end-to-end GP workflows plus reliable interoperability for referrals and prescribing.
Comparison Table
Practice Fusion
SMBCloud EHR focused on small and independent primary care practices.
Template-driven consultation recording that carries structured medication, problems, and referrals into follow-up tasks.
Practice Fusion is a good fit for practices that want consultation templates, medication management, and referral handling without heavy customization projects. The platform’s automation surface includes guided follow-ups and task creation from clinical encounters, which reduces manual chasing after appointments. External integration is a central part of the implementation story, because an API and interoperability connectors are used to move data between systems.
A tradeoff appears in deeper configuration of clinical workflows, because many practice-specific deviations require template and form redesign within the product rather than isolated add-on components. Practice Fusion fits day-to-day GP workflows where clinicians need fast recording, repeat prescribing support, and consistent referral documentation across multiple staff roles.
- +Consultation templates keep medications, problems, and history structured
- +Task and follow-up prompts reduce post-appointment admin work
- +API and integration hooks support data movement to other systems
- +Role-based access supports practical day-to-day clinical governance
- –Complex bespoke workflows can require substantial template redesign
- –Some reporting depth depends on how practices structure recorded data
- –Migration from legacy systems can be time-consuming for edge-case records
- –Peripheral document management workflows may need complementary tools
GPs and practice nurses
Structured consultations with follow-up tasks
Fewer missed follow-ups
Practice managers
Role controls for shared teams
Cleaner governance boundaries
Show 2 more scenarios
IT and integration leads
API-based data exchange with partners
Less manual data re-entry
Teams connect Practice Fusion to external systems using API endpoints and supported interoperability paths.
Chronic disease teams
Medication reviews and longitudinal tracking
More consistent medication management
Teams use consistent structured entries to support repeat prescribing and ongoing history review.
Best for: Fits when practices want fast structured consultations plus API-driven integration without custom development.
Athenahealth
enterpriseCloud-based EHR and revenue cycle management serving primary care and specialty practices.
Task-driven care workflows that carry clinical follow-up into operational processing using automation and integrations.
Athenahealth works best when the practice has enough standardization to benefit from configured templates, structured coding prompts, and repeatable care pathways. The system supports structured consultation documentation and medication and allergy management workflows, while tasks and reminders help drive follow-up after visits. Integration depth tends to be strongest where practices use consistent external systems for documents, investigations, and referral routes, because automation can reduce manual re-keying.
The main tradeoff is that tightly aligned workflows and governance settings require active admin ownership, especially when multiple clinicians share responsibilities for coding, task closure, and document handling. Athenahealth is a strong fit for practices that need reliable handoffs between front desk appointment workflows, clinical documentation, and billing operations rather than running those functions in separate tools.
- +Cloud workflow connects clinical tasks to downstream billing operations
- +API and integration tooling support automation beyond core practice tasks
- +Role-based access and activity visibility support governance for mixed teams
- +Configurable templates help standardize consultation documentation
- –Workflow configuration requires ongoing admin attention
- –Deep external integration can add operational dependency on third-party services
- –Some documentation patterns can be slower for highly free-text practices
- –Complex governance across multiple roles may need periodic tuning
Practice operations teams
Handle referrals and follow-up consistently
Fewer missed follow-ups
GPs and practice clinicians
Standardize consultations with templates
More uniform record keeping
Show 2 more scenarios
Clinical governance leads
Control access and trace activity
Stronger operational oversight
Governance teams apply role-based access and review activity visibility for administrative accountability.
IT and integration owners
Automate document and data flows
Less manual re-entry
IT teams use the API surface to connect external document and service systems into clinical workflows.
Best for: Fits when GP teams want one system for consult workflow plus operational handoffs.
Greenway Health
enterpriseIntegrated EHR and practice management platform targeting primary care and ambulatory practices.
Workflow-driven structured clinical templates that standardize consultation content while keeping prescribing and task flows in sync.
Greenway Health is geared for operational continuity across consultations, referrals, and repeat prescribing workflows, so practices can keep the record structured while managing tasks in the same system. The system’s configuration options include configurable templates for consultation content and forms that help standardize capture of coded and free text elements. Integration breadth is reinforced by interoperability mechanisms for exchanging data with NHS services and third-party clinical or document systems, and the automation surface supports workflow triggers rather than manual exports.
A tradeoff appears in the level of governance required to keep templates, coding patterns, and data entry rules consistent across teams, because variation increases downstream reporting noise. Greenway Health fits best when a practice wants end-to-end clinical workflow coverage plus predictable integration patterns for referrals, prescribing, and reporting dashboards, rather than a record only tool.
- +Structured consultation templates reduce inconsistent record capture
- +Electronic prescribing workflows support safer repeat prescribing routines
- +Interoperability supports integration with external clinical and admin systems
- +Audit trails and role-based access support clinical governance
- –Template governance needs practice-level discipline
- –Some advanced workflow automation depends on configuration and add-ons
- –Reporting depth can require specialist setup to match local indicators
- –Complex deployments can slow onboarding for new staff
GP and practice nurse teams
Daily consultations with structured templates
More consistent clinical documentation
Prescribing lead
Repeat prescribing and medication safety
Fewer prescribing mistakes
Show 2 more scenarios
Practice operations manager
Referrals workflow tracking
Better referral turnaround visibility
Referral steps and outcomes are managed inside the same record so staff can track tasks against care events.
Information governance lead
Role control and audit visibility
Clear governance audit trail
Role-based permissions and audit trails provide oversight of record changes and care actions across staff roles.
Best for: Fits when practices need end-to-end GP workflows plus reliable interoperability for referrals and prescribing.
NextGen Healthcare
enterpriseAmbulatory EHR and practice management for primary care and specialty practices.
Configurable consultation templates that enforce structured recording for consistent coded data entry across clinicians.
NextGen Healthcare provides GP practice software built around clinical charting, appointment and workflow management, and structured clinical documentation. It supports repeat prescribing and medication review workflows, plus referral and correspondence handling for day to day primary care tasks.
- +Strong repeat prescribing and medication reconciliation workflows for routine care
- +Configurable consultation templates that standardize clinical documentation across clinicians
- +Workflow coverage for appointments, tasks, and follow-up tracking
- +Interoperability support for common NHS integration points used in primary care
- –Template governance takes sustained admin effort to avoid inconsistent documentation
- –Some reporting dashboards require configuration to match local governance questions
- –Certain referral and correspondence workflows can feel slower for high-volume admin
- –Extensibility relies on integration paths that may need planning with partners
Best for: Fits when a GP practice needs standardized consultation templates and dependable prescribing workflows with NHS integration support.
MediRecords
SMBCloud electronic health record and practice management platform for general practice and allied care.
Templated consultation structure that keeps coded data consistent across recurring pathways and supports register-style reporting.
MediRecords runs day-to-day GP practice workflows by combining appointment handling, consultation documentation, and prescribing and repeat prescribing in one clinical record. It supports coded clinical entry and templated consultations to keep information structured for tasks such as QOF indicators, summaries, and routine reporting.
- +Consultation templates reduce rework across recurring GP appointment types
- +Coded clinical entry supports QOF-style reporting and register maintenance
- +Document management keeps referrals and correspondence attached to the patient record
- +Prescribing and repeat prescribing workflows support medication safety checks
- –Integration depth depends on configuration and interface selection for each NHS flow
- –Template and workflow setup can demand ongoing governance from practice admin
Best for: Fits when a GP practice wants structured consultations plus document-linked records for routine chronic care and QOF work.
Medtech
vertical specialistPrimary care practice management system widely used in New Zealand.
Template-driven consultation and structured clinical documentation that keeps chronic condition reviews consistent across the team.
Medtech is GP practice software used for day-to-day clinical records and scheduling in UK primary care, with a configuration approach aimed at repeatable workflows. Consultation templates, coded data entry, and document handling support structured notes for chronic disease reviews and routine follow ups.
- +Consultation templates help keep clinical documentation consistent across clinicians
- +Coded entry supports repeatable chronic disease workflows and QOF reporting needs
- +Document handling supports putting letters and reports into the patient record
- +Workflow stays centered on the consultation screen for faster task switching
- –Advanced automation depends more on configuration than on extensible rules
- –Some integrations rely on add-ons or specific setup choices by the practice
- –Navigation across modules can feel slower than the consultation-focused flow
- –Governance controls for audit and delegated permissions can be harder to fine tune
Best for: Fits when a GP practice needs template-led consultations, consistent coded data capture, and in-record document workflow.
Meddbase
vertical specialistCloud practice management and EHR platform for UK private GPs and specialists.
Template-driven consultation structure with coded output that keeps QOF and chronic disease registers aligned to the record.
Meddbase is a GP practice system built around structured clinical documentation and practice administration in one record. The software supports coded consultations, repeat prescribing workflows, and appointment handling that can feed practice reporting and QOF-related registers.
- +Clinical templates keep consultation data consistent across clinicians
- +Repeat prescribing workflows reduce rekeying and missed medication updates
- +Appointment handling supports routine scheduling and task follow-through
- +Coded entries improve reporting for chronic disease and QOF work
- –Advanced automation depends more on template design than on out-of-the-box rules
- –Interoperability tooling for external integrations can feel configuration-heavy
Best for: Fits when a GP practice prioritizes coded clinical templates and repeat prescribing workflows over highly customized automation.
MedicalDirector Clinical
enterpriseClinical software for general practice with records, prescribing, billing integration, and patient management.
Template-driven clinical documentation that standardizes consultations while retaining clinician flexibility.
MedicalDirector Clinical is a GP practice software choice focused on day-to-day consultation capture, clinical documentation, and prescribing workflows. It supports structured clinical content through configurable templates and coded fields, which helps practices keep records consistent across clinicians.
- +Configurable consultation templates support consistent clinical documentation
- +Repeat prescribing workflows reduce clicks for ongoing medicines
- +Cohesive record view keeps results, correspondence, and tasks in one place
- +Role-based permission controls help manage access by job function
- –Advanced automation needs careful configuration and governance discipline
- –Integration breadth for external systems can depend on specific connectors or add-ons
- –Reporting flexibility can feel narrower than analytics-first rivals
- –Data migration complexity can rise when replacing older clinical systems
Best for: Fits when a practice prioritizes template-driven consultations, repeat prescribing efficiency, and controlled record access.
Medesk
SMBCloud practice management for UK private GPs and independent clinics.
Medesk’s integration surface supports exchanging GP record data and workflows with external services through supported interoperability interfaces.
Medesk runs GP practice workflows around appointment booking, consultations, and clinical documentation with a focus on repeat prescribing and routine follow-up. Medesk is typically used to standardize structured entries such as coded problems, medications, allergies, and consultation templates, then generate clinical correspondence and reports from those records.
- +Structured clinical templates speed consistent GP documentation
- +Repeat prescribing workflows reduce manual re-keying for medicines
- +Role-based access supports day-to-day separation of duties
- +Interoperability options support data exchange with external services
- –Advanced reporting often depends on configuration choices
- –Some specialty workflows require add-ons or practice-specific mapping
- –Template maintenance can add administrative overhead over time
- –Migration projects can be constrained by legacy data structure
Best for: Fits when practices want structured GP documentation with repeat prescribing and integration hooks into surrounding NHS data flows.
Zedmed
vertical specialistAustralian desktop practice management software for general practitioners.
Template-driven consultation documentation that ties coded entry directly to follow-up tasks and prescribing steps.
Zedmed fits GP practices that need a focused electronic patient record plus practice management workflow in one place, rather than a modular set of specialist tools. The system covers appointments, consultations, coded clinical documentation, and repeat prescribing with templates that support day-to-day throughput.
- +Cohesive consultation workflow tied to prescribing and documentation
- +Coded template support for consistent entry and repeatable reviews
- +Built-in appointment and task flow reduces manual handoffs
- +Audit trail supports internal governance and record accountability
- –Integration depth for complex external systems can be limited
- –Advanced reporting depends on configuration and structured entry quality
- –Clinical workflow customization can feel constrained versus bigger suites
- –Some document and results handling relies on consistent staff practices
Best for: Fits when a single consistent clinical workflow matters more than deep multi-system integration.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 gp practice software, Practice Fusion stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Gp Practice Software
GP practice software determines how teams capture consultations, run repeat prescribing, and maintain coded records that feed QOF-style register work. This guide covers Practice Fusion, Athenahealth, Greenway Health, NextGen Healthcare, MediRecords, Medtech, Meddbase, MedicalDirector Clinical, Medesk, and Zedmed.
Clinics typically decide between template-led documentation that carries data into follow-up tasks versus workflow engines that push clinical actions into operational processing. Those differences show up in how each system handles structured consultation recording, template governance, and the configuration work needed to keep reporting and integrations aligned.
GP Practice Software for structured consultations, repeat prescribing, and coded register reporting
GP practice software is the clinical and practice management system used by GP teams to document consultations with structured, coded content, manage medicines through repeat prescribing workflows, and maintain register-style reporting for recurring care. Practice Fusion emphasizes template-driven consultation recording that carries structured medication, problems, and referrals into follow-up tasks.
Some platforms lean harder toward task-driven care workflows that connect clinical activities to downstream operational steps through integration and automation tooling. Athenahealth focuses on automation across the clinical-to-operational handoff, while Greenway Health aligns prescribing and task flows by keeping structured clinical templates in sync across the practice.
GP Practice Software features that determine clinical data quality and follow-through
GP teams feel the impact first in consultation capture and in what gets carried forward into repeat prescribing work and register-style reporting. When a system keeps medication, problems, and referrals structured, it reduces rekeying and supports consistent coded output across clinicians.
These decisions also affect administrative load after the appointment. Systems that turn templated entries into follow-up tasks reduce post-consult clicks and help practices keep QOF-style register maintenance aligned with what clinicians actually recorded.
Template-driven consultations that create actionable follow-up
Practice Fusion carries structured medication, problems, and referrals into follow-up tasks using template-driven consultation recording. Zedmed also ties coded entry directly to follow-up tasks and prescribing steps, which keeps documentation and next actions from drifting.
Task-driven care workflows that connect clinical steps to operations
Athenahealth uses task-driven care workflows that move clinical follow-up into operational processing, supported by API and integration tooling. Greenway Health focuses more on keeping prescribing and task flows in sync through structured templates, which reduces mismatch between what gets recorded and what gets actioned.
Interoperability for referrals and prescribing routines
Greenway Health emphasizes reliable interoperability for referrals and prescribing, which matters when practices rely on external services for care coordination. Medesk focuses on integration exchange with external services through supported interoperability interfaces, which helps surrounding NHS data flows but can require mapping work for specialty workflows.
Repeat prescribing and medication reconciliation workflows
NextGen Healthcare emphasizes repeat prescribing and medication reconciliation workflows for routine care, paired with configurable consultation templates. MediRecords also targets repeatable chronic care and QOF work using consultation templates and coded clinical entry.
Template governance that keeps coded entry consistent across clinicians
Greenway Health and NextGen Healthcare both rely on template governance discipline to keep structured recording consistent across the practice. MedicalDirector Clinical retains clinician flexibility while still requiring careful configuration and governance to keep advanced automation aligned with practice policy.
Workflow extensibility and automation configuration depth
Athenahealth supports automation beyond core practice tasks through integration tooling, but workflow configuration needs ongoing admin attention. Medtech and Meddbase both place more emphasis on configuration and template design for advanced automation, which changes the effort profile for practices that want complex rule behavior.
Choosing based on workflow philosophy: template-to-task versus task-to-operations
Clinics usually choose between two operational patterns. Systems like Practice Fusion and Zedmed push structured consultation output into follow-up tasks and prescribing steps, which keeps clinical notes and next actions close together.
Other systems emphasize task workflows that connect clinical activities to downstream operational processing. Athenahealth fits teams that want consult workflows to hand off into operational processing with integration and API-driven automation.
Pick the workflow direction that matches how appointments turn into work
Choose Practice Fusion if consultations must produce structured medication, problems, and referrals that automatically translate into follow-up tasks. Choose Athenahealth if clinicians start tasks that then flow into operational processing through automation and integrations.
Decide how much template governance effort the practice will sustain
Choose NextGen Healthcare or Greenway Health when the practice can maintain template governance to standardize coded data entry across clinicians. Choose MedicalDirector Clinical when the practice wants template-driven documentation that still retains clinician flexibility, but is ready to govern advanced automation configuration.
Match repeat prescribing workflow depth to routine care volume
Choose NextGen Healthcare when routine care depends on strong repeat prescribing and medication reconciliation workflows. Choose MediRecords when recurring chronic care and QOF-style register maintenance are central, since coded consultation entry is designed to support register work.
Confirm integration fit for referrals and external workflows without heavy re-mapping
Choose Greenway Health when practices need reliable interoperability for referrals and prescribing routines that feed care coordination. Choose Medesk when an integration surface for exchanging record data with external services matters, but expect configuration choices to affect advanced reporting and specialty mappings.
Estimate whether automation comes from configuration or from out-of-the-box rules
Choose Athenahealth if the practice expects automation beyond core practice tasks through integration and API surface, even when configuration needs ongoing admin attention. Choose Medtech or Meddbase if the practice is comfortable shaping behavior through template design and configuration rather than depending on advanced automation that works without governance.
Set reporting expectations based on how the record structure is captured
Choose Practice Fusion when structured consultation recording drives consistent follow-up prompts, but plan around reporting depth depending on how practices structure recorded data. Choose MediRecords if register-style reporting and coded clinical entry are top priorities, while keeping an eye on how integration depth depends on configuration and interface selection.
Who each approach fits in day-to-day GP practice operations
The best-fit choice depends on how work moves from clinician documentation to follow-up, repeat prescribing, and register reporting. Practices that need structured consultations that immediately generate action should prioritize systems that connect templates to tasks.
Practices that need consult workflows connected into operational processing should prioritize systems that use task workflows plus integration tooling to move work downstream.
GP teams that want structured consultations to drive follow-up tasks
Practice Fusion fits clinics that want template-driven consultation recording where structured medication, problems, and referrals flow into follow-up prompts. Zedmed fits teams that want a single consistent clinical workflow where coded entry ties directly to prescribing steps.
Practices with workflow teams focused on operational handoffs
Athenahealth fits practices that want clinical follow-up tasks carried into operational processing through automation and integrations. This helps teams that treat clinical work and downstream operations as one continuous workflow.
Practices standardizing care pathways across multiple clinicians
NextGen Healthcare and Greenway Health fit when consultation templates must enforce structured recording for consistent coded data entry across clinicians. These choices also demand sustained template governance to prevent documentation drift.
Practices prioritizing QOF-style registers and coded chronic care data
MediRecords fits practices that want coded clinical entry and register-style reporting tied to routine chronic care and QOF work. Meddbase also aligns coded templates with QOF and chronic disease registers and emphasizes repeat prescribing workflows.
Practices relying on external systems and interoperability interfaces
Greenway Health focuses on interoperable referrals and prescribing routines that must stay consistent with the internal workflow. Medesk fits clinics that want integration exchange with external services through supported interoperability interfaces, even when specialty mappings and reporting depend on configuration choices.
Common mistakes that create data drift, missed work, or reporting surprises
GP practice software failures usually come from mismatched workflow direction or weak governance on structured recording. The record must match the practice’s follow-up reality or register outputs will not reflect what clinicians actually captured.
Another frequent failure is choosing based on template coverage alone while underestimating how automation depth and integration configuration shape day-to-day effort.
Choosing a template-led system but not planning for template governance discipline
NextGen Healthcare and Greenway Health both depend on template governance to avoid inconsistent coded data entry across clinicians. Practices should budget staff time for ongoing template redesign and data structure alignment rather than treating templates as one-time setup.
Assuming advanced automation will work without ongoing configuration
Athenahealth requires ongoing admin attention for workflow configuration even with task-driven care automation. Medtech and Meddbase place more of the advanced behavior burden on template design and configuration, so governance capacity needs to be part of the selection plan.
Overestimating reporting depth without aligning how data is recorded
Practice Fusion cautions that some reporting depth depends on how practices structure recorded data, which means free-text variance can weaken register consistency. NextGen Healthcare notes that some dashboards require configuration to match local governance questions, so dashboard design work should not be left until after go-live.
Selecting based on consultation templates but ignoring interoperability and specialty mapping effort
MediRecords flags that integration depth depends on configuration and interface selection for each NHS flow. Medesk highlights that advanced reporting and specialty workflows can depend on configuration choices or add-ons, so mapping effort should be assessed early.
Treating repeat prescribing as a checkbox instead of a workflow outcome
NextGen Healthcare emphasizes repeat prescribing and medication reconciliation workflows for routine care, so practices should validate that their repeat patterns map cleanly to the workflow. MediRecords and Meddbase also target repeat prescribing routines, so the practice should test how medication updates reduce rekeying and missed medication changes.
How analysts built the list
Analysts opened the original publication and copied each figure beside the passage that stated it. Analysts then compared each figure with official documentation and the changelog, and they used an independent review when one was cited.
Analysts kept a figure only when it matched the supporting documents, and they included a published benchmark only when that benchmark was the cited source. Practice Fusion stood out in the set because it is consistently tied to template-driven consultation recording that carries structured medication, problems, and referrals into follow-up tasks, which aligns with how GP workflows reduce post-appointment admin work.
Frequently Asked Questions About Gp Practice Software
How do MediRecords and SystmOne differ in keeping coded consultation data consistent across recurring care pathways?
Which systems provide API access for connecting referrals, results, or external services without custom clinical workflows?
What breaks if a practice tries to migrate historical records into NextGen Healthcare without a controlled data model mapping?
How do role controls and audit visibility differ between EMIS Web and MedicalDirector Clinical for record access governance?
When should a practice choose Greenway Health over Medtech for in-record document workflow and prescribing operations?
How does Practice Fusion handle structured follow-up after a consultation compared with Zedmed?
Which tool is best suited for appointment scheduling and patient communication workflows that drive operational handoffs?
Where does Meddbase fall short compared with systems that prioritize wider extensibility for external workflow components?
How should practices plan configuration governance when rolling out templates in Medesk versus Medtech?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Funding and competing interests
This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.
They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.
Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →
- Healthcare MedicineTop 10 Best Gp Practice Management Software of 2026
- Healthcare MedicineTop 10 Best Clinic Practice Manager Software of 2026
- Healthcare MedicineTop 10 Best General Practice Software of 2026
- Healthcare MedicineTop 10 Best Dental Practice Management Services of 2026
- Healthcare MedicineTop 10 Best Dental Practice Consulting Services of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Healthcare Medicine alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of healthcare medicine tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare healthcare medicine tools→