GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Data Science AnalyticsTop 10 Best Fx Charting Software of 2026
Ranked roundup of fx charting software for FX traders, with side-by-side features and tradeoffs against TradingView, MetaTrader 4, Sierra Chart.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Sierra Chart is the right best choice for FX traders who want deeply customized charts with automated alerts wired to a controlled workflow, while MetaStock fits analysts needing repeatable rule backtesting. If you’re cost sensitive, Quantower is a strong lower-friction desk option.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Sierra Chart
Chart-based order workflow with detailed trade and account state feedback across linked windows.
Built for fits when fx traders need deeply customized charts and automated alerts tied to a controlled data workflow..
MetaStock
Editor pickBacktesting runs indicator-based rules on historical FX data with measurable results for repeat iteration.
Built for fits when FX analysts need repeatable desktop charting plus indicator rule backtesting..
Quantower
Editor pickWorkspace layout synchronization plus chart templates that keep multi-monitor FX analysis consistent across sessions.
Built for fits when FX desks need repeatable visual chart workflows with automation hooks..
Related reading
Comparison Table
FX charting software matters because trading decisions depend on data integrity, chart computation speed, and repeatable configurations across devices and users. This ranked list targets analysts and operators who compare chart rendering, scripting depth, and integration options, using verified capabilities instead of marketing claims.
Sierra Chart
enterpriseProfessional desktop charting platform supporting futures and FX markets.
Chart-based order workflow with detailed trade and account state feedback across linked windows.
Sierra Chart is built around chart-driven trading and market analysis on a desktop installation, with support for multi-window workspaces and repeatable chart configurations. The platform’s automation surface includes custom studies and alerting tied to chart data, which supports repeatable workflows for technical setups and trade monitoring. Sierra Chart’s differentiation is its depth of chart customization and the breadth of integration paths for getting data into charts and acting on it.
A tradeoff is that the feature depth increases setup and ongoing configuration work for data feeds, study parameters, and chart templates. Sierra Chart fits teams and individuals who need highly tailored charting and automation tied to their specific execution and data pipeline, rather than those who want a mostly preset charting experience.
- +Highly configurable chart layouts across multiple monitors
- +Custom studies support complex indicators and multi-series logic
- +Alerting can be driven by chart conditions and data states
- +Strong automation hooks around trading activity and chart events
- –Advanced configuration is required for many feed and chart setups
- –Scripting requires learning Sierra Chart study conventions
- –Complex workspaces can take time to standardize across users
- –Some integration paths depend on external connectivity components
FX traders on multi-monitor desks
Run repeatable chart templates with alerts
Fewer missed setup signals
Quant analysts
Validate custom studies on historical charts
Faster indicator iteration
Show 2 more scenarios
Integrations and automation teams
Feed external data into chart workflows
Consistent chart inputs
Selectable feed and integration options let charts reflect the same data used elsewhere in the stack.
Prop trading operators
Monitor execution-linked chart states
Tighter execution oversight
Trading activity can be monitored through chart context and linked state feedback.
Best for: Fits when fx traders need deeply customized charts and automated alerts tied to a controlled data workflow.
MetaStock
SMBTechnical analysis software with extensive charting and forecasting tools.
Backtesting runs indicator-based rules on historical FX data with measurable results for repeat iteration.
MetaStock’s core FX workflow centers on multi-window charting, saved chart templates, and indicator-driven studies built to run repeatedly over the same symbols and time frames. Charting features cover common technical overlays and comparison of historical segments, with tools designed for analysts who iterate on rules rather than drag-and-drop only. The development surface includes custom indicator scripting and automation through its chart and scan rule system.
A key tradeoff is that MetaStock’s customization and automation depth is stronger for indicator logic than for exchange-like live execution workflows, so it fits chart-first FX analysis more than broker-integrated trading. MetaStock is most useful when FX research teams maintain a consistent desktop environment and want to re-run the same scan logic and backtests across multiple currency pairs.
- +Indicator research workflow stays consistent across saved charts and templates
- +Backtesting engine supports repeatable indicator rule testing on historical data
- +Scripting supports building custom indicators and scan criteria
- +Good fit for FX technical analysis focused on charts and rule studies
- –Automation and integration options are limited compared with API-first platforms
- –Complex indicator builds can require more setup than click-only charting
FX research desks
Validate indicator rules across currency pairs
Faster rule selection cycles
Technical analysts
Standardize chart layouts for reviews
Lower review-to-review variance
Show 2 more scenarios
Quant-minded traders
Build and test custom indicators
Custom signal iteration
Use MetaStock’s indicator scripting to implement proprietary signals and then test them.
Risk and compliance reviewers
Export analysis for documentation
Clearer research traceability
Produce repeatable study outputs that can be referenced in written review workflows.
Best for: Fits when FX analysts need repeatable desktop charting plus indicator rule backtesting.
Quantower
SMBMulti-asset trading platform with advanced charting and volume analysis.
Workspace layout synchronization plus chart templates that keep multi-monitor FX analysis consistent across sessions.
Quantower delivers charting functions used in FX analysis such as candlesticks, tick-oriented views, volume-by-price style overlays, and cross-chart comparison with saved templates. It also includes a programmable side via custom indicators and automation interfaces, which fits teams that standardize chart studies and reduce manual review. Data ingestion can be configured from supported market feeds and broker connections, which matters when latency-to-fill tracking and execution visibility must line up with the same charts.
A tradeoff appears in custom workflow setup. Desktop installation and connection configuration can be heavier than web charting when multiple accounts or symbol mappings must stay consistent. Quantower fits situations where traders iterate on chart studies during live sessions and operations teams need repeatable layouts for a daily routine.
- +Multi-monitor workspace keeps correlated FX charts visible
- +Chart templates and layouts support consistent daily workflows
- +Automation hooks for indicators and trading-related events
- +Broker and feed connections align charts with execution context
- –Broker and symbol mapping needs careful setup for multi-venue FX
- –Some advanced chart study workflows take time to standardize
- –Desktop operation adds maintenance compared with pure web terminals
FX trading desks
Standardize live chart reviews
Faster, consistent decision review
Quant and automation teams
Attach alerts to custom indicators
Fewer missed triggers
Show 1 more scenario
Broker operations analysts
Validate execution context on charts
More reliable execution verification
Operations reviews whether fills and chart states match by checking connected account activity alongside charts.
Best for: Fits when FX desks need repeatable visual chart workflows with automation hooks.
TradingView
enterpriseWeb-based charting platform with extensive community scripts and multi-asset coverage.
Pine Script publishable indicators plus alert condition scripting on chart events for repeatable FX analysis routines.
TradingView pairs a browser-first charting workspace with custom indicator scripting in Pine Script, which makes FX chart workflows easy to share and extend. The charting stack supports multi-timeframe analysis, a wide drawing-tool set, and alert conditions tied to indicator logic.
Integration is strong through chart link sharing and published scripts, while data access relies on supported market data feeds rather than direct broker bridges. For FX chart review and strategy prototyping, it delivers faster iteration than client-heavy terminals and deeper collaboration than most single-user tools.
- +Pine Script indicator logic supports reusable custom technical studies
- +Alert conditions can reference indicator outputs for automated notification rules
- +Chart layouts and drawing tools are easy to standardize across sessions
- +Large public ecosystem of indicators and templates speeds FX workflow setup
- –Backtesting focuses on chart signals rather than a full FX order simulation
- –Broker-side execution bridges and FIX-style integrations are not native
- –Direct historical tick import for custom tick modeling is limited
- –Advanced automation and API extensibility are narrower than dedicated quant platforms
Best for: Fits when FX teams need shared chart templates, scripted indicators, and alerting for analysis workflows.
MetaTrader 4
enterpriseLegacy FX trading platform with widely supported MQL4 custom indicators.
MQL-compatible custom indicators can both render on charts and drive alert conditions using the same codebase.
MetaTrader 4 provides desktop charting and trading around custom indicator scripting in MQL, with tight broker-terminal integration. The chart workspace supports multi-monitor layouts, saved chart templates, and time-frame aggregation across standard and custom indicators.
The platform also supports alerts tied to indicator logic and a backtesting engine that runs the same indicator code used on charts. Data export and historical chart inspection are supported through platform tools and external workflows that pull indicator and price series into spreadsheets.
- +MQL indicator and alert logic runs directly against chart data
- +Chart templates save and reuse layout, indicators, and time frames
- +Backtesting executes strategy logic in the same scripting ecosystem
- +Multi-monitor workspace layout supports parallel chart review
- –Market depth style visuals and order flow overlays are not native
- –Renko, Point and Figure, and tick-derived chart types need extra indicator work
- –Complex indicator sets can slow redraw during fast price updates
- –Server-side admin controls for multi-user setups are limited in the terminal
Best for: Fits when traders need MQL-based chart automation, repeatable chart templates, and local backtesting tied to indicators.
cTrader
enterpriseECN trading platform with depth-of-market charting and algorithmic trading support.
Renko and Point and Figure charting with time-frame aggregation controls inside the same workspace.
cTrader targets traders who want charting tied closely to their execution workflow and local analysis controls. Its chart workspace supports multi-monitor layouts, chart templates, and a workflow centered on desktop installation rather than a web-only terminal.
Advanced chart types include time-frame aggregation views plus Renko and Point and Figure, and the indicator stack supports custom indicator scripting. Built-in alert conditions integrate with the platform’s order management context to reduce manual monitoring.
- +Multi-monitor workspace and chart templates for repeatable analysis layouts
- +Renko and Point and Figure chart types with time-frame aggregation controls
- +Custom indicator scripting for chart logic beyond stock indicators
- +Alert conditions align with order-related workflows in the terminal
- –Indicator scripting adds friction for users who only want point-and-click changes
- –Advanced order flow visuals are limited compared with dedicated market-data analytics tools
- –Historical tick import formats require more preparation than CSV OHLC workflows
- –Charting and execution tuning can take time when multiple brokers are used
Best for: Fits when traders need charting that stays tightly coupled to execution workflows and repeatable chart setups.
NinjaTrader
enterpriseDesktop trading platform with custom charting and market analyzer tools.
Event-driven strategy automation that can consume chart series updates for live and historical evaluation.
NinjaTrader targets FX charting users who want desktop workflows, local add-ons, and automation tied to order and execution context. It provides chart types and trading tools that support advanced technical analysis, plus a built-in automation layer for indicator logic and strategy-style calculations.
The platform also supports data import and export paths for historical market data so chart studies can be validated and replayed. NinjaTrader’s key differentiator versus web charting tools is the tighter coupling between chart annotations, indicators, and an automation surface that can react to live and historical bars.
- +Automation hooks connect chart events to strategy-style logic
- +Flexible charting toolbox with annotation and study customization
- +Historical data workflows support CSV import and export
- +Desktop multi-monitor workspace fits sustained chart review sessions
- –FX-specific data and broker connectivity can require setup work
- –Coding custom indicators and strategies takes scripting effort
- –Advanced chart study depth depends on installed add-ons
- –Tick-level workflows can be slower on large imported datasets
Best for: Fits when FX traders need desktop charting plus event-driven automation tied to execution logic.
ProRealTime
enterpriseWeb-based charting platform with proprietary technical analysis tools.
Strategy and indicator scripting that shares the same rule engine for chart logic, backtests, and alert conditions.
ProRealTime targets FX charting with a desktop-style workflow and an indicator and strategy scripting model built around ProRealTime’s own language. It provides charting plus an integrated research loop with backtesting and performance metrics over historical market data.
Chart customization supports advanced overlays and automated rule-based studies, with alerting tied to the same scripting environment. For teams that need consistent chart views across monitors, ProRealTime’s chart layout and template reuse workflows reduce manual setup during trading sessions.
- +Integrated backtesting and strategy evaluation inside the charting workflow
- +Custom indicator and rule scripts drive both studies and automated alerts
- +Chart templates and multi-monitor layouts reduce session-by-session setup time
- +Strong FX chart annotation tools for manual technical workflows
- –Scripting language is not plug-and-play with Pine Script or MQL-compatible ecosystems
- –API access for external automation and data integrations is limited
- –Advanced data import and reconciliation steps require careful symbol mapping
- –UI-based configuration can be slower than code-first indicator pipelines
Best for: Fits when FX traders need chart-driven scripting with integrated backtesting and repeatable chart templates.
MultiCharts
SMBProfessional charting and trading platform with EasyLanguage compatibility.
Integrated strategy research and execution workflow links indicators to backtests and live automation in one desktop environment.
MultiCharts runs desktop-based FX charting tied to strategy backtesting and order automation workflows. The software focuses on custom indicator scripting and automated strategy execution built around its own scripting engine.
It provides detailed chart tools for price visualization and historical analysis, including data import and export paths that fit chart research routines. MultiCharts also supports extensibility through broker integrations and external market data connectors used for live charting and testing.
- +Strategy backtesting connects directly to charting workflows for FX research
- +Custom indicator scripting supports repeatable signals across charts and strategies
- +Desktop installation supports multi-monitor trading layouts and persistent workspaces
- +Historical data import and CSV export support offline research and reconciliation
- –Configuration and debugging are slower than lighter chart-only tools
- –Broker connectivity depends on integration paths that vary by execution setup
- –Shared chart templates and team governance controls are limited compared with managed platforms
- –Real-time data handling and latency behavior require careful validation per feed
Best for: Fits when traders need desktop charting plus automated strategy research for FX execution testing.
ATAS
SMBVolume analysis trading platform with specialized order flow charts.
Order-flow oriented visualization built around tick timing and liquidity behavior for FX monitoring and post-trade review.
ATAS is a desktop-focused FX charting solution aimed at traders who need market depth context alongside price and time. It centers on tick-driven charting, including order-flow style visuals, plus advanced annotation and multi-chart layouts for fast trade review.
ATAS supports indicator workflows with programmable automation options, which matters when trading signals must run consistently across symbols and sessions. The software is also used by teams that want a repeatable chart setup for monitoring and analysis rather than ad hoc charting.
- +Tick-based chart workflows support intraday decision making with price granularity
- +Order-flow style visuals help connect price action with liquidity behavior
- +Chart templates and layouts speed up multi-monitor monitoring routines
- +Backtesting and strategy-style evaluation are usable for indicator-driven iteration
- –Automation and indicator customization require more setup than basic charting tools
- –Integration with external execution workflows is limited versus FIX-centered terminals
- –Browser-style access is not the default fit for traders who prefer web-only terminals
- –Multi-symbol throughput can feel constrained during heavy historical recalculation
Best for: Fits when intraday FX traders need tick-level charts, depth-linked visuals, and repeatable chart setups.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 data science analytics, Sierra Chart stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right fx charting software
FX charting software in this guide spans order workflow charting in Sierra Chart and repeatable analysis workflows in TradingView, MetaTrader 4, and Quantower.
The coverage also includes indicator and strategy scripting in ProRealTime and MultiCharts and event-driven automation tied to chart series updates in NinjaTrader. Order-flow and tick-focused visualization are covered via ATAS, while MetaStock and cTrader focus on desktop charting and alternative chart types for FX time-frame aggregation.
FX charting software for desktop chart signals, alert conditions, and automated strategy workflows
FX charting software maps FX price and time-series data into chart views, then connects those chart series to indicators, alerts, and backtesting or strategy logic. Sierra Chart emphasizes chart-based order workflow tracking across linked windows so chart actions reflect detailed trade and account state feedback.
TradingView and MetaTrader 4 focus on custom indicator logic that can drive chart event alert conditions, while MetaStock and ProRealTime emphasize repeatable backtesting or strategy rule evaluation on historical FX data. Quantower adds workspace layout synchronization so multi-monitor chart setups stay consistent across sessions, and ATAS centers intraday tick-level chart workflows tied to liquidity and order-flow style visuals.
FX charting requirements: chart workflow, scripting, and automation surface
FX charting software matters most when chart actions stay traceable to trade state, indicator outputs, and repeatable workflows across sessions. The top tools in this list connect chart series to alerts, strategy evaluation, or event-driven automation with clear boundaries between visual setup and logic execution.
The strongest differentiators show up in how each platform handles chart workflow control, custom indicator scripting, and backtesting scope on historical FX data. Sierra Chart centers chart-based order workflow tracking with linked windows, while TradingView and MetaTrader 4 focus on scriptable alert conditions tied to chart events.
Order workflow chart state visibility
Sierra Chart provides a chart-based order workflow with detailed trade and account state feedback across linked windows so chart actions map to execution context.
Repeatable indicator rule backtesting on FX data
MetaStock runs indicator-based rules on historical FX data and returns measurable results for repeat iteration across saved chart setups.
Multi-monitor workflow consistency via synchronized layouts
Quantower synchronizes workspace layouts and chart templates so multi-monitor FX analysis stays consistent across sessions.
Shared chart templates plus publishable scripted alerts
TradingView supports Pine Script indicator logic and alert conditions that reference indicator outputs, which keeps scripted FX analysis routines shareable inside teams.
MQL-compatible indicator logic for chart-driven alerts
MetaTrader 4 uses MQL-compatible custom indicators that render on charts and drive alert conditions using the same codebase.
Integrated chart logic for strategy-style rule evaluation and alerts
ProRealTime uses a shared rule engine so indicator and strategy scripting powers both chart studies and integrated backtests with alert conditions.
FX charting selection: align chart workflow control with automation depth
The best choice depends on whether charting needs to stay tightly coupled to order workflow feedback, or whether chart signals and alerting are the primary output. This category splits into three practical philosophies: desktop chart workflow control, script-first shared analysis routines, and strategy-oriented backtesting loops.
The decision should also match the automation surface that gets consumed by real workflows. Tools vary on scripting ecosystem, how chart event outputs feed alerts, and how broadly backtesting covers FX signal evaluation rather than full order simulation.
Choose chart-first order workflow tracking if trade state must be visible in the chart workspace
Sierra Chart is built around a chart-based order workflow where linked windows reflect detailed trade and account state feedback. This fit is strongest when execution context must remain readable while chart actions are being configured and monitored.
Choose script-first alerting if reusable indicator outputs must trigger chart event conditions
TradingView uses Pine Script indicator logic plus alert condition scripting that references indicator outputs. MetaTrader 4 provides a parallel workflow with MQL-compatible custom indicators driving alerts from the same codebase, which keeps indicator logic and notification logic tightly aligned.
Choose desktop backtesting repeatability when indicator rules must be re-run on historical FX data
MetaStock supports repeatable indicator rule testing on historical FX data and produces measurable results for each run. ProRealTime shifts the same idea into a single chart workflow where strategy and indicator scripting share one rule engine for backtests and alerts.
Choose workspace synchronization when multi-monitor FX analysis must stay consistent day after day
Quantower emphasizes workspace layout synchronization and chart template reuse so correlated FX charts remain visible with consistent structure. This helps when daily chart templates must persist across sessions without manual re-layout.
Choose event-driven strategy automation when chart series updates must drive live evaluation
NinjaTrader connects automation hooks to chart events so strategy-style logic can consume chart series updates for live and historical evaluation. This is a better fit than chart-only alerting when strategy logic must react to the stream of series updates.
Choose chart-type depth and aggregation controls if alternative FX chart constructions are central to analysis
cTrader pairs Renko and Point and Figure charting with time-frame aggregation controls inside one workspace. This matches workflows where FX chart construction choices matter as much as indicator scripting.
Who benefits from these FX charting software capabilities
FX teams benefit when charting tools preserve workflow repeatability and make logic outputs traceable to alerts or strategy evaluation. Different tools serve different job roles based on how they handle chart templates, scripting, and automation hooks.
Sierra Chart and Quantower target chart workflow control and visual consistency, while TradingView and MetaTrader 4 emphasize scripted indicator and alert routines. MetaStock, ProRealTime, and MultiCharts focus on backtesting and strategy research loops tied to chart workflows.
FX traders who need chart-based order workflow tracking across linked windows
Sierra Chart supports detailed trade and account state feedback in a chart-first order workflow, which helps during active monitoring and chart configuration.
FX analysts who run repeated indicator rule evaluations on historical FX data
MetaStock provides repeatable indicator rule backtesting on historical FX data with measurable results, which supports iterative analysis.
FX desks standardizing daily multi-monitor chart setups
Quantower keeps correlated charts visible with synchronized workspace layout and reusable chart templates, which reduces daily manual rearrangement.
FX teams sharing scripted analysis routines and alert conditions
TradingView supports Pine Script publishable indicators and alert condition scripting tied to chart events, which keeps the same logic consistent across shared templates.
Traders who want strategy-style automation driven by chart series updates
NinjaTrader’s event-driven strategy automation can consume chart series updates for live and historical evaluation, which supports reactive logic.
Common FX charting software pitfalls during tool selection
Many selection mistakes come from picking based on chart visuals instead of how logic is executed and reused. Another frequent failure is assuming backtesting scope matches the charting scope, which can break the expected workflow when alerts and strategy evaluation behave differently.
Several tools in this list require specific setup discipline around connectivity, mapping, or scripting conventions. These issues show up quickly when a platform is deployed into a real FX desk workflow with multiple venues and symbols.
Choosing chart-first visuals without checking whether backtesting simulates orders or only evaluates chart signals
TradingView’s backtesting focuses on chart signals rather than a full FX order simulation, so strategy assumptions can drift if order-level behavior is expected.
Assuming automation and integration are equally mature across all desktop charting tools
MetaStock’s automation and integration options are limited compared with API-first platforms, which can constrain workflows that require external program control.
Underestimating multi-venue symbol and broker mapping work for shared templates
Quantower requires careful broker and symbol mapping for multi-venue FX, so teams can lose automation reliability when mapping rules are incomplete.
Picking a scripting ecosystem and then discovering it does not match the team’s existing indicator strategy code
ProRealTime scripting is not plug-and-play with Pine Script or MQL-compatible ecosystems, which increases migration effort when a desk already has scripts in those environments.
Assuming alternative chart types like Renko and Point and Figure are equally supported without additional indicator work
MetaTrader 4 needs extra indicator work for Renko, Point and Figure, and tick-derived chart types, while cTrader includes Renko and Point and Figure charting with time-frame aggregation controls in the core workspace.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Sierra Chart, TradingView, MetaTrader 4, MetaStock, Quantower, cTrader, NinjaTrader, ProRealTime, MultiCharts, and ATAS against chart workflow control, repeatability, and automation depth. Features drove 40% of the ranking weight, while ease and value each drove 30%, using the provided overall, features, ease, and value scores.
We prioritized measurable alignment between chart series outputs and the next workflow step, like alerts, integrated backtests, or event-driven automation. We gave Sierra Chart the highest ranking because it combines chart-based order workflow tracking across linked windows with detailed trade and account state feedback while still supporting highly configurable multi-monitor chart layouts.
Frequently Asked Questions About fx charting software
How do TradingView and Sierra Chart differ in sharing and reproducing FX chart setups across teams?
Which FX charting tools support automation that reacts to chart updates using the same logic across live and historical data?
What breaks if an FX team needs direct broker connectivity for charting and execution context, then chooses TradingView instead?
When should Sierra Chart be preferred over Quantower for FX analysis that depends on controlled data workflow and detailed trade-state feedback?
How does NinjaTrader handle event-driven automation for FX chart series compared with MetaStock’s historical rule testing focus?
Which tools offer chart template and multi-monitor layout reuse to reduce setup time during FX trading sessions?
How do ATAS and cTrader differ when the workflow requires tick-level visualization and non-time-based chart types?
Where does MultiCharts fall short for teams that want strict desktop-only workflows without any connector-based data path changes?
What security and administration capabilities should be evaluated for SSO and access control when choosing between desk-based FX charting tools?
How should a team plan data migration if historical FX ticks or chart studies must be re-imported into a new charting platform?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Data Science Analytics alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of data science analytics tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare data science analytics tools→