GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Non Profit Public SectorTop 10 Best Fundraising Management Software of 2026
Ranking roundup of top fundraising management software, comparing OneCause, Bloomerang, and Aplos by features and fit for nonprofit teams.
How we ranked these tools
Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.
Agents extract product evidence with provenance, then collect written reviews and transcribe video reviews and podcasts.
Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
OneCause is the best fit when your fundraising runs through events and you need pledge-to-gift workflows with CRM sync, while Bloomerang works well for teams focused on structured recurring-donor stewardship and donor-centric reporting, and Little Green Light is the lower-cost entry if you just need solid attribution and gift-tracking operations.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
OneCause
Pledge processing with status-driven movement into gift records, including soft credit handling and acknowledgement linkage.
Best for: Fits when fundraising teams need campaign hierarchy and pledge-to-gift workflows with CRM sync.
Bloomerang
Editor pickRecurring giving automation that links donor status changes to stewardship tasks and campaign reporting in one workflow.
Best for: Fits when fundraising teams need structured stewardship automation and donor-centric reporting for recurring donors.
Aplos
Editor pickCampaign-aware fundraising workflows that carry appeal context through gifts, pledges, and acknowledgments.
Best for: Fits when fundraising teams need controlled gift processing, pledge tracking, and attribution reporting.
Comparison Table
OneCause
event-ledFundraising software for events, auctions, online giving, and donor engagement.
Pledge processing with status-driven movement into gift records, including soft credit handling and acknowledgement linkage.
OneCause is strongest for teams that need campaign-focused workflows that span solicitation, pledge tracking, and gift processing with operational controls. Campaign hierarchy support helps keep multi-layer campaigns organized during peak periods. The product’s automation covers common fundraising handoffs like pledge-to-gift movement, soft credit handling, and gift acknowledgement status tracking.
A tradeoff appears when organizations want ultra-custom data models beyond OneCause’s fundraising schema, because many customization paths depend on integration work rather than native field design. OneCause fits teams that run recurring giving and peer-to-peer alongside major gift pipeline activities, and that need consistent data movement into a donor CRM.
- +Strong campaign workflow coverage across events, pledges, and recurring giving
- +Batch-friendly gift processing reduces rework during high-volume periods
- +Integration and API support data movement to donor CRM and accounting flows
- +Acknowledgement workflow status tracking supports donor communication consistency
- –Setup complexity increases when aligning campaign hierarchy to existing processes
- –Deep customization often requires integration work instead of native schema changes
Development operations teams
Manage pledge-to-gift processing
Fewer reconciliation gaps
Peer-to-peer program staff
Attribute activity to appeals
Cleaner reporting structure
Show 2 more scenarios
Recurring giving managers
Operate recurring donor workflows
More consistent donor data
Managers run recurring giving operations while keeping downstream records aligned for reporting and follow-up.
Gift processing teams
Run batch updates and acknowledgements
Faster donor communications
Staff handle high-volume gift updates while acknowledgement workflow states stay synchronized.
Best for: Fits when fundraising teams need campaign hierarchy and pledge-to-gift workflows with CRM sync.
Bloomerang
SMBDonor management software with fundraising, marketing, reporting, and donor retention features.
Recurring giving automation that links donor status changes to stewardship tasks and campaign reporting in one workflow.
Bloomerang supports donor CRM workflows with gift history views, recurring giving tracking, and structured campaign reporting tied to appeals and segments. Built-in automation covers recurring donor processes and stewardship follow-up, which reduces reliance on spreadsheets for routine actions. Admin control centers on managing user access, configuring workflow triggers, and standardizing operational steps across teams.
A common tradeoff is that complex edge-case workflows can require heavier configuration and tighter process discipline to stay consistent across staff. Bloomerang works best when fundraising operations need repeatable pledge and gift follow-up cycles, with clear ownership of tasks and acknowledgements.
- +Recurring giving workflows stay tied to donor activity history
- +Stewardship and acknowledgement steps reduce manual follow-up work
- +Moves management tasks keep major gift pipelines structured
- +Campaign reporting supports consistent appeal attribution views
- –Multi-step edge workflows can need extra configuration discipline
- –Advanced customization can slow down change cycles for nontechnical admins
- –Complex fund accounting workflows may require external integration effort
Fundraising operations teams
Run stewardship and acknowledgement cycles
Fewer missed acknowledgements
Major gift programs
Track moves in a pipeline
More consistent cultivation follow-through
Show 2 more scenarios
Recurring giving teams
Manage subscriptions and renewal workflows
Cleaner renewal operations
Recurring giving workflows maintain donor continuity and trigger operational follow-up tied to gift changes.
Development leadership
Report on appeal performance
Faster fundraising performance reviews
Campaign reporting provides structured views of giving outcomes tied to appeals and segments for review.
Best for: Fits when fundraising teams need structured stewardship automation and donor-centric reporting for recurring donors.
Aplos
SMBNonprofit software that combines donor management, fundraising tools, accounting, and reporting.
Campaign-aware fundraising workflows that carry appeal context through gifts, pledges, and acknowledgments.
Aplos is a donor CRM built around fundraising operations such as gift entry, pledges, and campaign hierarchy so teams can execute moves without spreadsheet handoffs. The workflow model supports recurring giving management and gift acknowledgment steps, and it retains campaign-level context for later reporting and follow-up. Automation coverage centers on attribution and recurring transaction behavior instead of generic marketing automation.
A key tradeoff is that advanced governance features like granular RBAC and enterprise audit controls can require tighter configuration than some donor CRM options that ship more roles out of the box. Aplos fits best when fundraising staff need consistent gift processing and campaign reporting, and when finance teams need a reliable handoff for batch reconciliation and downstream accounting sync.
- +Fundraising workflows tie gifts, pledges, and campaigns together
- +Recurring giving and pledge handling support day-to-day program operations
- +Attribution-driven reporting supports solicitation follow-up
- +Batch-oriented processing helps keep gift entry consistent
- –Granular RBAC and audit depth can demand careful setup discipline
- –Some advanced fund accounting and GL edge cases may require add-on mapping
Development operations teams
Run gift batching and reconciliation
Fewer data corrections
Membership and recurring programs
Manage recurring giving schedules
Lower churn follow-up
Show 2 more scenarios
Major gift teams
Track major gift pipeline
Cleaner stewardship history
Campaign and solicitation context supports consistent stewardship after gift activity.
Finance and reporting coordinators
Sync fundraising data to accounting
More reliable month-end close
Structured transaction exports support downstream fund accounting and GL posting workflows.
Best for: Fits when fundraising teams need controlled gift processing, pledge tracking, and attribution reporting.
Donorbox
SMBOnline fundraising software for recurring giving, donation forms, donor management, and campaign tracking.
Donation-driven gift acknowledgment workflows that trigger from donation lifecycle events and keep donor communications aligned.
Donorbox manages fundraising workflows with a focus on donation capture, recurring giving support, and donor-facing payment experiences. It connects campaign collection, pledge and recurring schedules, and downstream reporting into a single operational flow for common fundraising motions.
- +Recurring giving setup and management for online donations
- +Webhooks and API support for syncing donors and transactions
- +Campaign pages designed for donation conversion workflows
- +Gift acknowledgment workflow tied to donation lifecycle events
- –Limited depth for complex moves management and pipeline stages
- –Soft credit allocation rules can be constrained for multi-party giving
- –Batch reconciliation and fund accounting sync may require external handling
- –Role-based governance controls are not as granular as enterprise CRMs
Best for: Fits when fundraising operations center on online giving, recurring donors, and integration-led data sync with external CRMs.
Givebutter
SMBFundraising platform for donation forms, campaigns, events, donor engagement, and payment processing.
Peer-to-peer fundraising pages that feed donation capture and campaign attribution into shared fundraising reporting.
Givebutter collects and manages online gifts through campaign pages and peer-to-peer fundraising tools that route donations into a centralized fundraising record. The system tracks pledges and recurring giving, supports gift acknowledgments, and carries campaign attribution across contributions.
- +Peer-to-peer fundraising pages connect campaign promotion to donation capture
- +Recurring giving tools reduce manual renewal work for ongoing campaigns
- +Gift acknowledgment workflow ties communications to donation events
- +Campaign attribution stays attached to contributions for reporting
- –Advanced fund accounting and general ledger posting are limited
- –Automation depends on configuration of campaign workflows and communication steps
Best for: Fits when teams need online-first fundraising capture with peer-to-peer, recurring gifts, and acknowledgment workflows.
Givecloud
SMBOnline fundraising platform with donation forms, donor management, events, stores, and payment processing.
Workflow-driven gift processing links acknowledgment and campaign context to each donation record.
Givecloud manages fundraising programs with donation capture, pledge workflows, and campaign reporting built around real donor activity. Teams can run multi-campaign operations with structured forms, segmentation, and acknowledgments tied to gift records.
- +Campaign setup uses configurable donation forms and routing
- +Gift workflow supports staged processing from submission to acknowledgment
- +Campaign reporting surfaces outcomes by period and segment
- +Constituent organization is practical for frequent fundraising cycles
- –Moves management support is limited for complex pipeline governance
- –Fund accounting and GL posting coverage is shallow for tight month-end controls
- –Integration breadth depends heavily on specific connectors and exports
- –Fine-grained authorization controls feel less granular than enterprise CRM
Best for: Fits when organizations need structured fundraising workflows and campaign reporting without deep fund accounting control.
Raisely
API-firstFundraising platform for donation pages, peer-to-peer campaigns, recurring gifts, and supporter engagement.
Participant and team management within peer-to-peer campaigns keeps attribution and progress aligned across gifts and pledges.
Raisely differentiates itself with a fundraising operations workflow centered on peer-to-peer and team fundraising management rather than just donation recordkeeping. It provides tools for campaign setup, pledge and gift collection, and donor-facing participation experiences that tie contributions back to people and groups.
- +Peer-to-peer team fundraising workflows map cleanly to participant roles
- +Pledge and donation tracking keeps contributions aligned to campaigns and people
- +Recurring giving management reduces separate processes for ongoing donors
- +Campaign and participant reports make operational follow-up more direct
- –Donation and fund reporting depth can fall short for complex accounting needs
- –Advanced automation often depends on integration paths instead of native rules
- –Data governance is less granular than CRMs that offer extensive permission sets
- –Some gift attribution configurations require careful campaign setup discipline
Best for: Fits when fundraising teams run peer-to-peer campaigns with participants, pledges, and recurring gifts and need operational oversight.
Little Green Light
SMBAffordable nonprofit CRM software for donor records, gift tracking, acknowledgments, and reporting.
Campaign hierarchy tracking keeps appeals and attribution aligned across multiple concurrent campaigns and reporting views.
Little Green Light is fundraising management software built for charities that run many campaigns with structured reporting and staff accountability. It combines constituent records, donation workflows, and multi-campaign tracking into a single operating surface for operations teams and fundraising staff.
- +Campaign hierarchy tracking keeps cross-campaign reporting consistent
- +Gift acknowledgment workflow reduces missed thank-you steps
- +Moves through clear operational queues for gift entry and updates
- +Appeal and solicitation code attribution stays attached to records
- –Reporting setup needs governance discipline to avoid mislabeled attribution
- –Deep accounting workflows may require coordination with external fund accounting processes
Best for: Fits when fundraising teams need reliable campaign attribution and operational workflows without heavy custom development.
Funraise
SMBFundraising software for donation pages, peer-to-peer campaigns, events, and donor management.
Campaign hierarchy configuration that propagates attribution and reporting across peer-to-peer and standard fundraising gifts.
Funraise runs a full fundraising operations workflow, from campaign setup and peer-to-peer fundraising to donor management and gift processing.
- +Native peer-to-peer campaign workflows connect fundraising pages to CRM records.
- +Recurring giving tracking keeps pledges and payments aligned to campaign targets.
- +Attribution fields like solicitation codes and campaign hierarchy flow into reporting.
- +Role-based access supports separate admin, manager, and reviewer responsibilities.
- –Complex campaign hierarchies can require careful setup before launching multiple appeals.
- –Some finance-grade reporting depends on external fund accounting processes.
Best for: Fits when mid-market teams need peer-to-peer driven campaigns with recurring giving tracking and controlled admin workflows.
DonorDock
SMBFundraising CRM software for donor management, online giving, campaigns, and automated communications.
Moves management with assignment-aware workflow stages that drive task ownership across campaigns.
DonorDock targets fundraising teams that need day-to-day case and campaign administration without heavy customization work. It supports constituent and gift workflows for moves management, plus donation processing and acknowledgment paths for standard fundraising operations.
- +Moves management workflows track actions from assignment through closure
- +Gift acknowledgment workflow ties donors to campaign activity and dates
- +Campaign hierarchy supports multi-level reporting across appeals
- +Role-based access helps separate data entry from approvals
- –API and integration details appear limited compared with top CRMs
- –Batch reconciliation and GL posting depth can require external accounting handling
- –Some advanced governance workflows need more manual coordination
- –Limited visibility into complex soft credit rules for edge cases
Best for: Fits when mid-market teams need practical moves and campaign administration with controlled access.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 fundraising management software, OneCause stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Fundraising Management Software
Fundraising management software helps teams coordinate donor records, campaign hierarchy, and gift processing across pledges, recurring giving, and acknowledgements. This buyer’s guide covers OneCause, Bloomerang, Blackbaud Net Community, Neon One, and eight additional tools from the fundraising management category.
The guide’s direction centers on whether each platform connects operational workflows to reporting outcomes through integration, automation, and governance controls. OneCause is used as a benchmark for pledge-to-gift status movement and soft credit handling. Bloomerang is used as a benchmark for recurring giving automation that ties donor status changes to stewardship tasks and campaign reporting.
Fundraising Management Software for campaign-to-gift workflows, recurring giving, and acknowledgement tracking
Fundraising management software manages the end-to-end path from solicitation and campaign attribution into gifts, pledges, and acknowledgements. These systems typically connect donor CRM records to campaign context so teams can keep reporting consistent while they move records through operational workflow stages.
OneCause centers on pledge processing that moves status-driven items into gift records with soft credit handling and acknowledgement linkage. Bloomerang ties recurring giving automation to donor status changes so stewardship actions and campaign reporting stay aligned inside one workflow. For teams comparing tools like Donorbox or Givecloud, the core differences usually show up in how tightly donation lifecycle events trigger acknowledgement steps and how much governance depth exists for complex moves management.
Fundraising workflow control, integration surface, and governance depth
Fundraising management software has to convert campaign intent into gift, pledge, and acknowledgement records without breaking attribution across recurring giving, peer-to-peer capture, and staged acknowledgements. OneCause is the reference point for status-driven pledge-to-gift movement tied to soft credit handling and acknowledgement linkage.
Pledge-to-gift status movement and acknowledgement linkage
OneCause moves status-driven items into gift records and links acknowledgement steps to those pledge-to-gift transitions with soft credit handling. Aplos also ties fundraising workflows across gifts, pledges, and acknowledgements, but it leans into campaign-aware context that can demand careful setup for access and tracking.
Recurring giving automation tied to donor activity and stewardship
Bloomerang links recurring giving workflows to donor status changes so stewardship tasks and campaign reporting stay aligned in one process. Little Green Light focuses on campaign hierarchy tracking and attribution across multiple concurrent campaigns, which reduces attribution drift during ongoing recurring activity.
Campaign hierarchy and appeal context propagation across records
OneCause and Aplos both support campaign hierarchy and carry appeal context through the operational path from pledge and gift handling into acknowledgements. Funraise also propagates campaign hierarchy configuration across peer-to-peer and standard gifts, which matters when multiple appeals must share consistent attribution views.
Online-first capture with event-driven acknowledgement triggers
Donorbox centers online donation lifecycle events and triggers gift acknowledgements to keep donor communications aligned with each transaction. Givecloud also links acknowledgement and campaign context to each donation record through workflow-driven processing that stages items from submission to acknowledgement.
Peer-to-peer participant and team attribution management
Raisely maps peer-to-peer participant and team fundraising roles to people and campaign tracking so progress stays aligned across gifts and pledges. Givebutter also supports peer-to-peer fundraising pages that feed donation capture and campaign attribution into shared fundraising reporting, which fits teams that prioritize online capture.
Moves management stages with task ownership and workflow stages
DonorDock provides moves management with assignment-aware workflow stages that drive task ownership across campaigns. DonorDock’s focus on move stages contrasts with OneCause’s pledge-to-gift workflow depth, which is more oriented toward pledge processing than complex pipeline governance.
Integration-ready automation surface and API-accessible workflow hooks
Donorbox pairs webhooks and API support with online giving so teams can sync donors and transactions with external donor CRM systems. DonorDock’s API and integration details appear limited compared with tools that support deeper workflow automation around pledge and recurring giving.
Choose by workflow architecture: pledge processing, recurring automation, or peer-to-peer operations
Shortlists usually fail when teams pick based on campaign features rather than the operational path that actually produces gifts, pledges, and acknowledgements. OneCause and Bloomerang set two different workflow architectures, with OneCause anchored in pledge processing and Bloomerang anchored in recurring giving automation.
Start from the record path that creates revenue
If the daily work is pledge processing that must become gift records with soft credit handling and acknowledgement linkage, OneCause fits the workflow shape shown in pledge status movement. If stewardship and reporting need to follow recurring donor status changes automatically, Bloomerang fits the recurring giving automation workflow shape.
Pick the campaign hierarchy model that matches how appeals run
If multiple concurrent appeals must share consistent attribution views, Little Green Light emphasizes campaign hierarchy tracking across reporting views while also supporting gift acknowledgement workflow to reduce missed thank-you steps. If appeals must carry appeal context through gifts, pledges, and acknowledgements with workflow ties, Aplos emphasizes campaign-aware workflows.
Confirm acknowledgement triggers match the donation capture channel
For online giving where acknowledgement steps must align with donation lifecycle events, Donorbox provides donation-driven gift acknowledgement workflows backed by webhooks and API support. For organizations that want staged gift processing from submission to acknowledgement with campaign context, Givecloud emphasizes workflow-driven gift processing and acknowledgement linkage.
Evaluate how peer-to-peer attribution and team roles are enforced
If peer-to-peer team fundraising needs participant and team oversight that keeps attribution and progress aligned, Raisely is built around participant and team management for peer-to-peer campaigns. If the priority is peer-to-peer page-driven capture plus campaign reporting in shared views, Givebutter fits the peer-to-peer pages feeding donation capture and attribution.
Stress-test moves management against pipeline governance needs
If fundraising operations rely on assignment-aware moves stages that close tasks across campaigns, DonorDock is oriented around moves management workflow stages and closure tracking. If pipeline governance is tied to pledges and recurring giving operations rather than assignment stages, OneCause and Bloomerang align better with the operational path used for pledge-to-gift and recurring stewardship.
Map finance-grade constraints to fund accounting and GL posting depth
If fund accounting and GL posting depth must support tight month-end controls, tools with shallow finance coverage like Givecloud and DonorDock may force external accounting handling. If teams mainly need recurring giving and pledge workflows that feed reporting with manageable finance edge cases, Bloomerang and OneCause can reduce rework in high-volume periods.
Who should buy based on the operating model inside fundraising teams
Fundraising management software works best when it matches the way teams move records through operations. OneCause suits teams that need pledge-to-gift movement with soft credit handling and acknowledgement linkage built into the workflow.
Campaign operations teams managing pledge workflows across CRM sync
OneCause fits when campaigns rely on pledge-to-gift status movement with soft credit handling and acknowledgement linkage that must remain consistent through the workflow. It also supports campaign hierarchy coverage across events, pledges, and recurring giving while reducing rework during high-volume periods.
Recurring giving and stewardship teams running automated lifecycle follow-up
Bloomerang fits when recurring giving automation has to tie donor status changes to stewardship tasks and campaign reporting in one workflow. Its recurring workflows stay tied to donor activity history, which helps teams avoid manual follow-up drift.
Organizations that run peer-to-peer campaigns with participant and team oversight
Raisely fits when participant roles and team attribution must stay aligned across gifts and pledges inside peer-to-peer campaigns. It keeps attribution and progress mapped to people, which reduces errors during participant-driven fundraising.
Online giving teams that depend on donation lifecycle events for acknowledgements
Donorbox fits when web-based donation capture must trigger gift acknowledgement workflows and keep donor communications aligned with each transaction. Its webhooks and API support also helps teams sync donors and transactions with external donor CRM systems.
Mid-market teams that manage task ownership through moves stages
DonorDock fits when moves management requires assignment-aware workflow stages that drive task ownership across campaigns. It also ties gift acknowledgement workflows to donors with dates while focusing governance on move stages.
Common buying and implementation pitfalls in Fundraising Management Software projects
Teams often compare features but underestimate configuration discipline needed to keep attribution consistent across campaign hierarchy, access rules, and staged workflows. OneCause and Aplos both highlight how setup complexity rises when campaign hierarchy must align to existing processes and when customization depends on integration work.
Choosing based on campaign reporting screenshots instead of the pledge-to-gift workflow stage behavior
OneCause is built around status-driven pledge processing that moves items into gift records while maintaining soft credit handling and acknowledgement linkage. Teams should validate that their pledge lifecycle and acknowledgement steps match that stage behavior instead of assuming reports will fix workflow gaps.
Underestimating how recurring edge workflows require configuration discipline
Bloomerang can require extra configuration discipline for multi-step edge workflows that link donor status changes to stewardship tasks and campaign reporting. Teams should plan governance for how those edge cases are configured so automation does not stall or misroute tasks.
Assuming online acknowledgement automation covers complex moves management
Donorbox centers donation-driven gift acknowledgements and focuses on online giving event triggers with webhooks and API support. Givecloud and OneCause show how workflow-driven processing can include staged acknowledgements tied to campaign context, but moves management depth can still be shallow for complex pipeline governance in some tools.
Ignoring finance-grade constraints like fund accounting and GL posting depth until month-end
Givebutter and Givecloud show limited depth for advanced fund accounting and general ledger posting compared with workflows that focus on capture and acknowledgement. DonorDock can require external accounting handling for batch reconciliation and GL posting depth, which creates late-stage delays.
Launching peer-to-peer without validating participant and team attribution rules
Raisely emphasizes participant and team management so attribution and progress stay aligned across gifts and pledges. Givebutter supports peer-to-peer pages feeding donation capture and shared fundraising reporting, so teams should test how participant roles map to campaign reporting before scaling.
Analyst-checked workflow and integration evidence for Fundraising Management Software
Analysts gathered product figures by opening the original publication and copying each figure beside the passage that describes a capability or workflow claim. Analysts compared every copied figure with official documentation and the changelog, and they used an independent review only when a review was cited as the figure source.
Analysts kept a figure when it matched those documents and they added a published benchmark only when that benchmark was the cited source. OneCause stood out in the selection because the pledge-to-gift status movement pattern with soft credit handling and acknowledgement linkage repeatedly aligned with how similar workflow claims were documented.
Frequently Asked Questions About Fundraising Management Software
How do fundraising management tools handle campaign hierarchy and attribution across multiple campaigns?
Which platforms provide APIs or automation hooks for syncing gift and pledge data to other systems?
What breaks when teams rely only on donor CRM fields instead of a pledge-to-gift workflow?
When does SSO or RBAC matter for large fundraising teams running shared queues?
How do teams migrate historical gifts, pledges, and acknowledgment status without losing linkage?
Which tools handle peer-to-peer and participant management with ongoing pledges and recurring giving?
What is the tradeoff between workflow depth and deep fund accounting control?
How do gift acknowledgment workflows differ when donations trigger events versus staff-driven queues?
Where does moves management or case-style administration fit, and which systems support it best?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Funding and competing interests
This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.
They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.
Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Non Profit Public Sector alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of non profit public sector tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare non profit public sector tools→