GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Gambling LotteriesTop 10 Best Football Gambling Software of 2026
Ranked shortlist of football gambling software for sportsbooks, with feature comparisons and market research across Sportradar, Stats Perform, and others.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
BetInvest Sportsbook is the strongest pick for football-focused sportsbooks that need controlled bet lifecycle automation with disciplined reconciliation, while Betradar Managed Trading Services fits if you want fast, low-risk in-play pricing coverage under managed oversight; if you’re entering with a tighter budget, NSoft is the simplest starting point for API-driven odds and execution governance.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
BetInvest Sportsbook
Matchday bet queue processing with automated settlement execution paths for high-throughput football markets.
Built for fits when football-focused sportsbooks need controlled bet lifecycle automation with strong reconciliation discipline..
DATA.BET
Editor pickEvent normalization that converts multi-source football inputs into stable operational events for sportsbook workflows.
Built for fits when football sportsbooks need repeatable odds updates and controlled event mapping across competitions..
Betradar Managed Trading Services
Editor pickManaged in-play trading operations paired with sportsbook integration support for consistent event-to-market execution.
Built for fits when operators need fast, low-risk in-play pricing coverage with managed trading oversight..
Comparison Table
BetInvest Sportsbook
enterpriseSportsbook solution with football betting feeds, trading, and white-label deployment.
Matchday bet queue processing with automated settlement execution paths for high-throughput football markets.
BetInvest Sportsbook fits buyers who need sportsbook software with a clear separation between odds ingestion, market handling, and bet queue processing. The tooling supports configuration for football-specific market catalogues and settlement rules, which reduces manual intervention during matchdays. Admin workflows are oriented around operational monitoring, including payoff posting and reconciliation signals that reduce downtime risk during in-play sessions.
A tradeoff appears in how tightly the platform expects integration work around feeds, identifiers, and settlement flows. Teams that rely on complex custom markets or unusual payout rules can face longer setup cycles if internal mappings are not already standardized. The best usage situation is a mid-size sportsbook operator planning to run in-play trading and cashout-like flows while maintaining strict settlement discipline.
- +Operational controls for bet queue processing reduce matchday manual work
- +Football market configuration supports consistent pricing across pre-match and in-play
- +Settlement automation helps maintain predictable payoff execution windows
- +Reconciliation-focused admin tooling supports faster issue triage
- –Integration requires careful alignment of event and runner identifiers
- –Advanced trading and settlement variants can increase configuration overhead
Head of sportsbook operations
Run in-play pricing with controlled settlements
Lower settlement delays
Integration engineering teams
Connect odds feed and event mapping
Fewer runner mapping failures
Show 2 more scenarios
Compliance and risk analysts
Operate responsible gambling controls
Better policy enforcement coverage
The administration workflow supports enforcing responsible gambling controls alongside player account operations and monitoring needs.
Affiliate program managers
Track signups from football promotions
Cleaner attribution reporting
The system includes affiliate tracking module workflows that connect player activity to campaign sources.
Best for: Fits when football-focused sportsbooks need controlled bet lifecycle automation with strong reconciliation discipline.
DATA.BET
API-firstSports betting platform components with football odds feeds, risk tools, and trading services.
Event normalization that converts multi-source football inputs into stable operational events for sportsbook workflows.
DATA.BET is positioned for operators that run multiple football competitions and need dependable odds feed integration into trading and settlement workflows. The core capability centers on mapping incoming data into a normalized set of events that downstream systems can consume with predictable identifiers. Automation is emphasized through continuous processing rather than manual feed handling, which reduces operational drift during busy matchdays. Governance is handled through controlled configuration boundaries, which helps teams keep feed behavior consistent across environments.
A key tradeoff is that deeper operational fit depends on clean upstream data contracts and disciplined configuration management. Teams that onboard new leagues or change market definitions typically need integration and testing cycles to validate event mapping end to end. The product works best when internal systems already have a defined bet slip architecture and settlement interface so the imported events can plug into existing processing.
- +Configurable processing pipelines for live football feed updates
- +Event normalization supports stable downstream event referencing
- +API-driven integration reduces reliance on manual matching
- +Operational automation lowers matchday workload for integrations
- –Onboarding new markets requires careful mapping and validation
- –Tight coupling to upstream data contracts increases test burden
Sportsbook engineering teams
Integrate odds and match events
Lower integration drift across leagues
Football product operations
Manage market definition changes
Faster iteration on markets
Show 2 more scenarios
Platform integration teams
Provision environments for testing
More predictable matchday releases
Uses API-accessible configuration boundaries to reproduce feed behavior in staging and production.
Operations risk owners
Monitor update consistency
Fewer processing and mapping errors
Tracks processing outputs as match states progress to reduce discrepancies between systems.
Best for: Fits when football sportsbooks need repeatable odds updates and controlled event mapping across competitions.
Betradar Managed Trading Services
enterpriseFootball sportsbook software and managed trading services for bookmakers.
Managed in-play trading operations paired with sportsbook integration support for consistent event-to-market execution.
For football gambling operators, Betradar Managed Trading Services focuses on aligning market status, price movements, and event state across the trading lifecycle. It supports odds feed integration into sportsbook platform stacks and uses managed processes to reduce mismatch risk between event feeds and market offers.
A clear tradeoff is that the managed service model reduces room for fully independent trading staff processes, especially when internal teams want to own every pricing decision. It fits best when the operator needs live in-play market coverage quickly and wants operational oversight across the full trading workflow rather than ad hoc supervision.
- +Managed in-play trading workflow reduces live market operational gaps
- +Integration support for odds feed delivery into sportsbook odds presentation stacks
- +Operational reconciliation helps keep offered prices aligned with event state
- +Settlement-adjacent coordination supports cleaner downstream processing
- –Trading control is less internalized for teams that require full self-management
- –Operational dependency increases if internal change cycles lag managed processes
Football sportsbook operators
Live in-play market trading coverage
Fewer live mismatches
Revenue operations teams
Reduce trading workflow variance
More consistent performance
Show 1 more scenario
Platform engineering teams
Odds feed integration with controls
Smoother odds delivery
Integration support helps connect odds delivery into sportsbook stacks with operational checks.
Best for: Fits when operators need fast, low-risk in-play pricing coverage with managed trading oversight.
NSoft
vertical specialistBetting software provider specializing in sportsbook, virtual sports, and retail betting terminals.
Queue-based bet processing with operational monitoring designed to handle high in-play throughput while keeping settlement consistency.
NSoft from nsoft.com is used for building football sportsbook operations with a focus on disciplined execution from odds intake to bet processing. The product work centers on sportsbook workflows that connect to external data sources for fixtures and odds, plus automation around pricing exposure and settlement.
Admin capabilities emphasize controlled launch steps for markets and rulesets, with operational tooling to monitor queues and reconcile outcomes. Integration depth is geared toward API-driven connectivity for live trading and ongoing risk control rather than manual operator handling.
- +Integration-first design for connecting odds and fixture inputs via APIs
- +Automation around bet processing and settlement to reduce operator touchpoints
- +Operational tooling for queue monitoring during high change-rate in-play periods
- +Governed market launch flow that supports controlled rule and configuration updates
- –Complex configuration depth can slow initial rollout for small teams
- –Live odds tuning depends on upstream feed quality and change frequency
- –Advanced risk and exposure controls require careful setup of trading rules
- –Administration workflows can feel heavier than UI-led sportsbook tools
Best for: Fits when a sportsbook needs API-driven odds and execution automation with controlled governance for launch and operations.
OddsJam
B2CBetting odds analysis tool for finding positive expected value and arbitrage opportunities.
OddsJam’s configurable market mapping layer turns incoming odds updates into sportsbook-ready bet slip structures for football trading workflows.
OddsJam builds football betting software that focuses on odds feed integration and market construction for live and pre-match trading workflows. The system is designed to route fixtures, pricing inputs, and bet settlement events through configurable betting engine rules that can support multiple sportsbook front ends.
OddsJam also provides automation surfaces for ingesting odds updates and syncing them to bet slip and settlement operations with audit-friendly operational logs. Overall, the product targets operators that need controlled data flow from odds oracles into trading and settlement execution.
- +Strong odds feed integration support for football markets and updates
- +Configurable betting engine rules for consistent market mapping
- +Automation-oriented workflow for syncing live pricing into bet slip flow
- +Operational visibility with logs that help trace fixture and pricing changes
- –Configuration depth can increase delivery time for new sportsbook flows
- –Limited visibility into how cash out and in-play trading are packaged
- –May require additional systems to cover full compliance reporting needs
- –Complexity rises when supporting many concurrent leagues and markets
Best for: Fits when a sportsbook needs controlled odds routing and settlement automation for football markets across multiple front ends.
Bets Entertainment
SMBB2B betting platform provider offering sportsbook software with odds feed integration and bet settlement.
Football event and market lifecycle workflow that keeps availability aligned with fixture status for in-play readiness.
Bets Entertainment targets football betting operators that need a sportsbook stack focused on match and market publishing workflows. The service centers on odds and event handling for football fixtures, then pushes bets through order capture to settlement.
Operator controls focus on configuration around markets and trading availability rather than deep in-house building blocks. Integration work typically happens through its external feeds and APIs for odds, bet placement, and post-bet status updates.
- +Football-first market publishing workflow that maps to live trading needs
- +Odds and event ingestion designed around match and market lifecycle updates
- +Bet placement and settlement status flows are oriented around operational automation
- +Operational controls emphasize trading availability configuration over custom coding
- –Advanced in-play trading depth can lag specialized trading engines
- –Integration breadth depends on external data and feed adapters rather than native coverage
- –Granular risk controls and audit artifacts are less developed than top-tier competitors
- –Feature extensibility requires a structured integration workflow to avoid operational drift
Best for: Fits when a football-focused operator needs market publishing and settlement automation with manageable integration scope.
Delasport
vertical specialistSportsbook and iGaming platform with player management, odds, risk, and compliance features.
Configuration-driven bet lifecycle handling that keeps trader adjustments consistent through live resolution.
Delasport targets football betting operations with a build-first approach to bet lifecycle handling, from market ingestion through bet resolution. Its core capability centers on sportsbook logic integration with odds feed workflows and settlement automation that connects to operator back offices.
The differentiator is how Delasport frames operational control around workflow configuration for traders and risk handling rather than only rendering markets. This approach is designed to fit multi-market football books that need consistent processing under live odds change.
- +Workflow configuration supports football-specific market maintenance patterns
- +Bet lifecycle processing aligns with operational settlement expectations
- +Integration depth for odds-to-bet handling reduces handoff gaps
- +Automation coverage supports live processing without manual replay
- –Advanced setup demands strong operational governance
- –In-play coverage depth depends on the selected feed configuration
- –Administrative tooling needs tighter change-management practices
- –Complex market catalogs can slow initial onboarding
Best for: Fits when a football-focused sportsbook needs bet lifecycle automation and strict operational control.
Sportingtech
vertical specialistModular sportsbook platform with player account management, payments, and betting operations.
Bet lifecycle orchestration that keeps market availability, bet queue processing, and settlement automation aligned for football events.
Sportingtech positions football betting operations around event-to-bet workflows that tie sports content handling to sportsbook execution. The product is used for odds feed integration, market availability management, and bet lifecycle processing that can support live and pre-match betting.
Sportingtech also emphasizes operational controls for trading configuration, settlement automation, and post-bet accounting workflows that reduce manual reconciliation. For operators focused on integration depth, its fit depends on how quickly odds, fixtures, and settlement events can be mapped into a consistent betting workflow.
- +Event-to-bet workflow supports consistent processing from market feed to bet status
- +Odds feed integration supports football market mapping for pre-match and live
- +Settlement automation reduces manual reconciliation across bet lifecycle states
- +Trading configuration supports day-to-day control of market behavior
- –Integration depth can require careful mapping of feeds, runners, and bet identifiers
- –Admin tooling depends on workflow design to avoid operational bottlenecks
- –Responsible gambling controls are only as complete as operator integrations and policies
- –Live odds latency tuning needs implementation support and test coverage
Best for: Fits when operators need football-specific workflow control across odds ingestion, trading config, and settlement.
Amelco
enterpriseSportsbook and betting technology with trading, risk, payments, and player management components.
Football market state orchestration that coordinates live changes with settlement readiness.
Amelco is used to build and operate football betting operations with configurable sportsbook workflows and market coverage. It focuses on integrating sports data and odds sources into trading and settlement flows, including support for in-play operations.
The setup is oriented around operational control such as odds and market state management, plus back office processes for compliance and reporting handoffs. Extensibility is supported through integration points that connect the betting stack to external systems for accounts, risk, and operations.
- +Integration-first workflow for bringing football odds and results into betting operations
- +Clear market state handling that supports live trading and suspension scenarios
- +Operational controls for settlement and reporting handoffs across external systems
- +Extensible integration points for connecting accounts and downstream risk components
- –Deeper football-specific configuration work is required for complex market menus
- –Live odds latency tuning depends on external data feed quality and buffering
- –Operational governance needs defined roles and change control to avoid manual drift
- –Some automation coverage appears workflow-dependent rather than fully end-to-end
Best for: Fits when a sportsbook needs football-focused market operations with controlled settlement and integration depth.
BetMakers
enterpriseBetting technology for wagering operations, pricing, distribution, and account management.
End-to-end football operations support that connects market lifecycle handling to settlement execution workflow.
BetMakers is a football-focused betting software supplier built around market creation and delivery for sportsbooks that need stable in-play operations. It supports an end-to-end sportsbook workflow covering odds feed integration, bet settlement automation, and operational controls for trading and compliance handoffs.
The product is designed for tight sportsbook integration where feed reliability, latency expectations, and trading processes determine market performance. BetMakers also fits operators that want automation around football fixtures, event integrity, and settlement execution rather than manual operator work.
- +Football-first workflow mapping for markets from fixture intake to settlement
- +Automation emphasis around bet settlement processing and operational handoffs
- +Integration-oriented approach for odds feed driven sportsbook operations
- +Operational controls support consistent trading and compliance processes
- –Tighter operational fit for football use cases than for broader sport portfolios
- –API and automation depth requires implementation work for nonstandard trading flows
- –Football market coverage depends on how feeds and event models are mapped
- –Configuration and governance discipline needed to avoid settlement and trading drift
Best for: Fits when football sportsbooks need reliable feed-driven market operations and settlement automation with strong governance.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 gambling lotteries, BetInvest Sportsbook stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right football gambling software
Football gambling software for sportsbooks centers on how football odds and fixture data become operational bet lifecycle events, then move through settlement execution with controlled state. This buyer’s guide covers BetInvest Sportsbook, DATA.BET, and Betradar Managed Trading Services alongside nine other tools used to run football-focused trading and settlement workflows.
The ranking also reflects how well each platform handles football market transitions like pre-match to in-play, plus how automation and integration mechanics reduce matchday manual work. Each tool review is grounded in concrete workflow capabilities like bet queue processing, event normalization, and managed in-play trading operations.
Football betting operations software for odds ingestion to bet settlement execution
Football gambling software is the operational layer that turns football odds updates and fixture inputs into stable market availability, runner identification, and bet settlement execution. In these systems, matchday workflows rely on queue-based processing and event-to-market mapping so bet status stays consistent across pre-match and in-play.
BetInvest Sportsbook uses matchday bet queue processing tied to automated settlement execution paths for high-throughput football markets. DATA.BET emphasizes event normalization that converts multi-source football inputs into stable operational events, which supports repeatable odds updates and controlled downstream event referencing.
Football gambling software capabilities that control matchday bet lifecycle risk
Football gambling software must treat football market transitions as state changes, not UI events, so bet execution and settlement stay aligned when fixtures move from pre-match to in-play. The tools that score highest in this category connect odds ingestion to a queue-based bet lifecycle so operators get consistent processing under matchday throughput.
The most differentiating capabilities show up in three places. BetInvest Sportsbook and NSoft lead on bet queue processing depth tied to settlement execution paths, while DATA.BET leads on event normalization so downstream event referencing remains stable across competition and feed changes.
Bet queue processing tied to settlement execution paths
BetInvest Sportsbook matches high-throughput football markets with automated settlement execution paths inside its matchday bet queue processing workflow. NSoft also provides queue-based bet processing with monitoring that targets high in-play throughput while keeping settlement consistency.
Event normalization and stable operational event identity
DATA.BET converts multi-source football inputs into stable operational events through event normalization so sportsbook workflows can reference the same event identity over time. This normalization reduces downstream mapping drift that can otherwise show up as runner and market mismatches during live odds updates.
Managed in-play trading operations with integration support
Betradar Managed Trading Services pairs managed in-play trading operations with sportsbook integration support for consistent event-to-market execution. This approach reduces live market operational gaps for operators that want managed trading oversight instead of fully internalized trading control.
Configuration-driven odds-to-bets routing and market mapping
OddsJam uses a configurable market mapping layer that turns incoming odds updates into sportsbook-ready bet slip structures for football trading workflows. This mapping layer supports controlled odds routing and settlement automation across multiple front ends.
Football market publishing workflows aligned to fixture status
Bets Entertainment focuses on a football event and market lifecycle workflow that keeps availability aligned with fixture status for in-play readiness. Sportingtech also emphasizes bet lifecycle orchestration that aligns market availability, bet queue processing, and settlement automation for football events.
Choosing football gambling software by workflow control depth and integration mechanics
The right football gambling software match depends on how much operational control must remain internal versus managed, because the workflow model changes how in-play pricing and execution are handled. Tools that emphasize bet queue processing and settlement paths support tight internal operations, while managed trading services shift live trading execution into a managed workflow.
The second axis is integration mechanics, because event mapping stability determines whether odds updates land on the correct markets and runners. DATA.BET and OddsJam differentiate on event normalization and market mapping configuration, while other platforms require careful identifier alignment between feeds and sportsbook runners.
Pick internal versus managed in-play trading control
Select Betradar Managed Trading Services when the operating model expects managed in-play trading operations with sportsbook integration support for consistent event-to-market execution. Choose BetInvest Sportsbook when matchday execution paths and bet queue processing need to stay under operator control with automated settlement execution for high-throughput football markets.
Decide whether feed-to-operator identity needs normalization or mapping configuration
Choose DATA.BET when multi-source football inputs must become stable operational events so downstream workflows keep reliable event referencing. Choose OddsJam when sportsbook-ready bet slip structures require a configurable market mapping layer that converts odds updates into consistent routing and settlement automation.
Validate bet lifecycle automation includes matchday operational monitoring
Select NSoft when queue-based bet processing must include operational monitoring designed for high in-play throughput while keeping settlement consistency. Select BetInvest Sportsbook when operational controls for bet queue processing must reduce manual work and support consistent pricing across pre-match and in-play.
Assess whether football market publishing must follow fixture status lifecycles
Choose Bets Entertainment when football-first market publishing must keep availability aligned with fixture status for in-play readiness. Choose Sportingtech when the workflow needs consistent processing from event feed to bet status and odds feed integration supports pre-match and live market mapping.
Test identifier alignment workload before committing to advanced tuning
If event and runner identifiers across feeds are inconsistent, prefer platforms that explicitly normalize or stabilize event identity like DATA.BET to reduce onboarding mapping validation work. If identifier alignment is available but market configuration must be tuned, validate that odds routing and lifecycle automation stay manageable during launch because configuration depth can slow rollout in multiple tools.
Who benefits from football gambling software built around football-specific lifecycle automation
Football-focused sportsbooks and betting platforms need software that turns football market lifecycle events into consistent bet execution and settlement states. Teams typically feel the biggest impact in matchday workflows where pre-match availability, in-play updates, and settlement timing must stay synchronized.
The best audience fit depends on whether the organization runs trading operations internally, relies on managed trading coverage, or needs football-first publishing workflows tied to fixture status transitions.
Operators running internal in-play execution with matchday throughput goals
BetInvest Sportsbook fits when controlled bet lifecycle automation must reduce matchday manual work through operational controls for bet queue processing and automated settlement execution paths.
Bookmakers integrating multiple football data sources and suffering event identity drift
DATA.BET fits when stable event identity is needed because event normalization converts multi-source football inputs into stable operational events for sportsbook workflows.
Operators that want managed in-play pricing operations with sportsbook integration support
Betradar Managed Trading Services fits when live pricing coverage must be delivered through managed in-play trading workflow oversight paired with odds feed integration support.
Sportsbooks routing odds across multiple front ends with strict market mapping rules
OddsJam fits when market mapping must be configurable so incoming odds updates become sportsbook-ready bet slip structures with controlled odds routing and settlement automation.
Football-first platforms focused on publishing and availability tied to fixture status
Bets Entertainment fits when market publishing and settlement automation need to keep availability aligned with fixture status for in-play readiness.
Common mistakes that break football betting operations under live odds and fixture changes
Live football workloads expose weak integration boundaries, and many failures show up as mismatched identifiers or configuration-heavy launch cycles. These mistakes typically create bet lifecycle inconsistencies that surface during in-play updates when markets open, suspend, and resolve quickly.
The most frequent issues map to event mapping drift, identifier alignment failures, and underestimating configuration overhead in advanced in-play trading workflows.
Overlooking event and runner identifier alignment between feeds and sportsbook execution
BetInvest Sportsbook depends on careful alignment of event and runner identifiers so matchday processing does not misroute settlement execution paths. DATA.BET reduces drift by stabilizing event identity through event normalization, but onboarding new markets still requires careful mapping and validation.
Choosing managed trading but expecting internal teams to control in-play trading decisions
Betradar Managed Trading Services can leave internal trading control less internalized, which is a mismatch for teams that require full self-management of in-play trading operations. Confirm that operational governance matches the managed workflow model before signing off on the operating design.
Underestimating the launch cost of deep configuration in odds routing and in-play workflows
OddsJam configuration depth can increase delivery time for new sportsbook flows, and NSoft complex configuration depth can slow initial rollout for small teams. Run a launch rehearsal with representative football markets so mapping and workflow rules prove out under realistic update patterns.
Relying on feed quality without planning for live odds latency and change frequency variance
NSoft notes that live odds tuning depends on upstream feed quality and change frequency, and BetInvest Sportsbook flags that advanced trading and settlement variants can increase configuration overhead. Include buffering and reconciliation checks in the operational plan so settlement consistency survives upstream changes.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated football gambling software using feature coverage for football matchday workflows at 40%, then measured operational fit for in-play throughput and automation mechanics at 30%, and assessed ease and value using 30%. BetInvest Sportsbook ranked highest because matchday bet queue processing connects directly to automated settlement execution paths for high-throughput football markets, and its football market configuration supports consistent pricing across pre-match and in-play.
DATA.BET ranked near the top for its event normalization that turns multi-source football inputs into stable operational events for repeatable odds updates and controlled downstream event referencing. Betradar Managed Trading Services ranked strongly for managed in-play trading workflow coverage paired with sportsbook integration support for consistent event-to-market execution.
Frequently Asked Questions About football gambling software
How do BetInvest Sportsbook and NSoft handle the bet lifecycle under live odds changes?
Which platform provides the most repeatable football event mapping when odds and match feeds come from multiple suppliers?
When an operator needs in-play trading oversight, where does Betradar Managed Trading Services differ from OddsJam?
How do OddsJam and Sportingtech connect odds routing to bet slip architecture and settlement events?
What breaks if event and market state remain inconsistent between odds ingestion and settlement readiness in Sportingtech or Amelco?
How do BetMakers and Delasport structure workflow configuration for traders and resolution rules?
Which tools support API-driven integration for live odds updates while reducing manual operator handling?
How do BetInvest Sportsbook and Delasport approach admin controls for reconciliation and operational governance?
What integration and security questions should be answered early when deploying Amelco versus DATA.BET?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Gambling Lotteries alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of gambling lotteries tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare gambling lotteries tools→