GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
AI In IndustryTop 10 Best Factory Automation Software of 2026
Top 10 factory automation software roundup ranking Twinmotion, Tulip, and MachineMetrics by features, fit, and tradeoffs for manufacturing teams.
How we ranked these tools
Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.
Search agents gather the source set and the review record, including transcriptions of video reviews and podcasts.
Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Twinmotion is the best fit if your priority is interactive factory layout visualization and operator-ready 3D digital twin rendering without touching control logic, whereas Tulip is the stronger choice when you need no-code shop-floor apps with traceable data capture and IoT-driven automation.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Twinmotion
Real-time visualization editing that turns imported industrial geometry into walkthrough media quickly.
Best for: Fits when design teams need interactive plant visualization for operator reviews without running control logic.
Tulip
Editor pickWorkflow apps that collect structured operator inputs and route results through programmable integrations.
Best for: Fits when manufacturing teams need operator workflows, traceable data capture, and integration-driven automation.
MachineMetrics
Editor pickConfigurable work and measurement logic that links machine events to operator actions with consistent reporting.
Best for: Fits when manufacturers need event-to-action visibility across lines with configurable workflows and an integration-focused API.
Comparison Table
Twinmotion
enterpriseReal-time visualization tool for factory layout planning and 3D digital twin rendering built on Unreal Engine.
Real-time visualization editing that turns imported industrial geometry into walkthrough media quickly.
Twinmotion supports a visualization workflow built around imported geometry, materials, and lighting, with rapid iteration via direct editing and scene organization. Interactive outputs include video, still images, and walkthrough-style experiences that can reflect scenario changes through scene logic and triggered states. Factory automation data integration is not its native focus, so it typically relies on external tooling to feed events or synchronize visuals with plant systems. Governance controls such as RBAC, audit logging, and data lineage are not part of the core Twinmotion feature set.
A key tradeoff is that Twinmotion does not replace SCADA, MES, or PLC engineering workflows, so it cannot directly manage field I/O, tags, or production rules. It is best used when visualization must be validated early, such as layout review for operator ergonomics or review of changeover concepts with scenario walkthroughs. It also works when engineering teams already have an external automation layer and only need a controllable visual front end for reviews and training.
- +Fast scene iteration for imported CAD and repeated layout reviews
- +High-quality rendering for operational walkthroughs and design signoff
- +Interactive presentations support scenario-specific visual states
- +Direct authoring workflow reduces dependency on complex scripting
- –No native plant tag database or direct PLC-to-visual synchronization
- –Limited governance features for multi-team approvals and traceability
- –Automation logic lives outside Twinmotion for real operational behavior
- –Large models can strain performance during editing and review
Industrial design and layout teams
Iterate workstation and aisle layouts
Fewer review cycles
Commissioning and change managers
Validate operating concepts before rollout
Clearer operator readiness
Show 2 more scenarios
Training content developers
Create guided factory walkthrough training
More repeatable training
Video and walkthrough outputs present procedures with consistent visual context for trainees.
Automation program managers
Use visuals as an interface layer
Faster stakeholder alignment
External tools map events into Twinmotion scene triggers for review and stakeholder demos.
Best for: Fits when design teams need interactive plant visualization for operator reviews without running control logic.
Tulip
SMBNo-code frontline operations platform for building shop-floor applications with IoT device integration.
Workflow apps that collect structured operator inputs and route results through programmable integrations.
Tulip’s core workflow model lets teams design operator-facing screens, forms, and actions, then bind those UI steps to data sources and process events. Data captured during execution becomes structured records that can be exported or synchronized to historians, MES, data lakes, or ticketing systems via integrations and programmable endpoints. The admin surface supports role-based access, controlled content sharing across workspaces, and change tracking for app artifacts and configuration.
A practical tradeoff is that deep PLC-to-edge control logic still lives in PLCs, and Tulip primarily orchestrates and records work at the shop-floor layer. The best fit is a line or cell where standardized work instructions, quality checks, and traceable genealogy need frequent updates without rebuilding PLC logic. Teams also benefit when they need extensibility for custom events, analytics pipelines, and automated downstream actions triggered by operator submissions.
- +No-code app builder for operator work instructions and structured data capture
- +Event and submission endpoints support integration with external systems
- +Role-based access and workspace controls support controlled rollout to lines
- +Audit logging tracks changes to apps and configuration for governance
- –PLC control logic remains outside Tulip and must be implemented elsewhere
- –Complex data modeling still depends on downstream systems integration work
- –High-frequency control loops can be a poor fit for workflow-oriented execution
Quality operations teams
Digitalize inspection steps per job
Faster NCR routing and reporting
Operations supervisors
Standard work instructions on shop floor
Lower variation across shifts
Show 2 more scenarios
IT and integration engineers
Automated events to enterprise systems
Less manual data syncing
Teams send execution events and submission payloads to downstream platforms through API-driven interfaces.
Continuous improvement teams
Rapid iteration of line work apps
Quicker process rollout
Teams update workflow screens and data capture rules without reprogramming control logic.
Best for: Fits when manufacturing teams need operator workflows, traceable data capture, and integration-driven automation.
MachineMetrics
SMBIoT-based machine monitoring and production analytics platform for discrete manufacturing.
Configurable work and measurement logic that links machine events to operator actions with consistent reporting.
MachineMetrics centralizes industrial data capture and normalizes it into datasets that operators and production engineers can use for OEE-style visibility. Configuration supports defining machine context, mapping incoming signals to business metrics, and building visual monitoring views for supervisors. Automation is practical when teams want alerting on thresholds, guided work execution, and consistent reporting across multiple lines.
A key tradeoff appears in initial signal mapping and workflow design effort, since meaningful results depend on clean tags, stable naming, and agreed business rules. MachineMetrics fits best when a manufacturing organization already has PLC tag databases or a historian feed and needs a tighter loop from data capture to actionable shop-floor workflows.
- +Event-driven dashboards tie machine signals to operational outcomes
- +Workflow configuration connects monitoring to guided shop-floor execution
- +Multi-line setups keep metric definitions consistent for reporting
- +API support supports custom integrations and data pulls
- –Initial tag and rules mapping is required for accurate metrics
- –Complex edge cases need deeper configuration than basic rollups
- –Advanced reporting often depends on disciplined data definitions
- –High customization can increase admin overhead across lines
Manufacturing operations managers
Shift handover based on machine events
Faster containment of abnormal runs
Industrial data and automation teams
Integrate PLC signals into analytics
Reduced custom ETL maintenance
Show 2 more scenarios
Production supervisors
Alerting on threshold breaches
Quicker response to drift
Trigger notifications when defined conditions match machine behavior and process rules.
Quality engineers
Track recurring defects by machine state
Lower defect recurrence rates
Correlate quality events with machine run context to isolate repeat causes.
Best for: Fits when manufacturers need event-to-action visibility across lines with configurable workflows and an integration-focused API.
Ignition by Inductive Automation
enterpriseSCADA platform for building HMI, monitoring, and control applications with unlimited licensing model.
Unified Ignition tag system links real-time, alarms, historian, and web HMI so configuration changes propagate consistently.
Ignition by Inductive Automation targets factory integration with an edge-to-enterprise SCADA and historian stack plus a separate web visualization layer.
- +Gateway-centered architecture supports multi-site integration with consistent tag namespace
- +Event-driven alarms and notification rules connect directly to historical and real-time tags
- +Built-in OPC UA and protocol gateway options reduce custom middleware for many plants
- +Vision module and scripting enable web HMI screens tied to the same tag system
- –Project organization and module versioning can raise maintenance effort at scale
- –Complex deployments rely on careful gateway configuration and role-based access planning
- –Higher-end automation patterns often require disciplined scripting and testing
- –Some vertical workflows depend on additional modules instead of core features
Best for: Fits when factories need tag-based SCADA plus historian, with web HMI and extensibility across multiple sites.
Rockwell Automation FactoryTalk
enterpriseProduction software suite for manufacturing execution, analytics, asset performance, and operations management.
FactoryTalk Services Platform centralizes security, configuration services, and runtime coordination across multiple FactoryTalk applications.
Rockwell Automation FactoryTalk packages SCADA, HMI, and manufacturing operations tools around the FactoryTalk Services Platform. It ties system configuration, historian, and alarm workflows to a consistent Windows-based administration model used with Rockwell controllers.
- +Unified FactoryTalk engineering and runtime tooling for alarms and operator displays
- +Tight alignment with Rockwell controller tag structures for consistent data propagation
- +Historian and alarm processing designed for industrial runtime workloads
- +Integration gateway options support common industrial connectivity patterns
- –Strong Rockwell ecosystem coupling increases effort when standardizing on non-Rockwell PLCs
- –Project governance and role separation take careful configuration across multiple services
- –Extensibility typically depends on specific FactoryTalk services rather than one generic layer
- –Operational troubleshooting spans several components, which slows root-cause analysis
Best for: Fits when Rockwell PLC-centered plants need coordinated SCADA, HMI, alarms, and historian under shared administration.
Parsec TrakSYS
enterpriseMES and operations performance platform for regulated and batch manufacturing environments.
Built-in traceability and quality execution workflows tied to asset and production events reduce custom integration effort.
Parsec TrakSYS is a factory automation software suite aimed at production tracking, quality workflows, and operational visibility. It distinguishes itself by centering equipment performance data capture and traceability workflows around shop-floor execution rather than only industrial telemetry dashboards.
- +Production traceability workflows map cleanly to shop-floor execution steps
- +Configurable work and quality steps reduce reliance on custom UI development
- +Asset-focused tracking supports line and machine level performance reporting
- +Role-based access supports separation between operators and administrators
- –Integration breadth depends heavily on the specific connector and data handoff path
- –Workflow design can require disciplined governance to avoid configuration sprawl
- –Advanced analytics often require additional reporting configuration work
- –Scenarios needing deep edge logic may exceed what TrakSYS handles natively
Best for: Fits when manufacturing teams need end-to-end production and quality traceability with configurable operator workflows.
SCADAforge
SMBCloud-based SCADA platform for remote monitoring of distributed factory equipment.
Event and automation rules tied directly to point states with programmatic exports for system integration.
SCADAforge focuses on configurable industrial data collection and supervisory visualization without forcing a rigid proprietary workflow. Core capabilities include building tag-driven dashboards, mapping signals to points, and routing telemetry to external systems through documented integrations and scripts.
- +Tag-based configuration supports fast creation of point-to-visual mappings
- +Automation rules can trigger on live values and state changes
- +Integration paths support exporting telemetry to other systems
- +Project separation helps manage multiple assets under one admin boundary
- –Advanced orchestration across MES and batch workflows needs external tooling
- –Governance for large operator teams depends on careful role design
Best for: Fits when small to mid-size teams need tag-driven SCADA-style visualization plus integration to existing systems.
Fero Labs
enterpriseAI-powered process optimization platform for heavy industry manufacturing using explainable machine learning.
Change-controlled deployment of automation configurations tied to user permissions and audit visibility across updates.
Fero Labs positions its factory automation software around building and governing industrial workflows that connect to live plant signals. The core offering centers on a visual automation layer tied to an integration surface for PLC and industrial data sources.
- +Governance supports controlled releases of automation configurations
- +API-first integration helps connect plant systems and external services
- +Workflow automation reduces custom scripting for common operations
- +Role-based access supports separation between engineering and operations
- –Protocol coverage depends on add-on integrations for some devices
- –Advanced automation patterns need developer support for best results
- –High-throughput tag ingestion can require careful configuration tuning
- –Complex multi-line deployments take more setup time than expected
Best for: Fits when manufacturing teams need workflow automation with controlled change management and API-based integrations.
AVEVA Production Management
enterpriseManufacturing execution system for production tracking, traceability, and operations intelligence.
Managed production execution workflows that bind operator actions, work status, and performance outputs into one controlled operational timeline.
AVEVA Production Management coordinates manufacturing execution workflows across plants using configuration of production, operations, and quality steps. It integrates shopfloor events with enterprise systems so status, work instructions, and performance signals stay consistent across shifts.
- +Workflow configuration supports end to end production execution across units
- +Enterprise integration supports consistent status propagation to planning and reporting
- +Role-based controls support operational separation between planning and plant roles
- +Performance and quality signals can be linked to execution events
- –Modeling and mapping of plant assets and events takes governance discipline
- –Deep shopfloor integration often requires protocol gateways and system integrator effort
Best for: Fits when manufacturers need managed execution workflows that tie plant events to enterprise reporting and controls.
ThinkIQ
enterpriseManufacturing operations platform providing context-aware production data and supply chain traceability.
Event-to-action analytics workflow that links detected operational patterns to automated operational responses.
ThinkIQ focuses on industrial analytics and AI-assisted decisioning layered on top of live plant data, with an emphasis on automated insights and operational recommendations. Core capabilities center on ingesting signals from existing industrial systems, normalizing data for analysis, and turning event patterns into actionable workflows for operations teams. It also provides an integration and automation surface for connecting operational data sources and coordinating downstream actions in a controlled way.
- +Industrial analytics workflow supports turning sensor events into actions
- +Integration approach favors connecting existing plant data sources quickly
- +Automation surface supports coordinating operational logic without heavy engineering
- +Normalization and analysis steps reduce repeated data wrangling across projects
- –Process control depth for PLC-side logic remains limited compared with SCADA or MES suites
- –Automation governance needs deliberate setup to keep changes auditable
- –Advanced extensibility depends on the available connectors and integration hooks
- –Workflow performance depends on data volume management and ingestion design
Best for: Fits when teams need AI-assisted operational insights from existing plant data without replacing SCADA or PLC control logic.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 factory automation software, Twinmotion stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Factory Automation Software
Factory automation software in this buyer’s guide spans interactive plant visualization, operator workflow capture, event-driven monitoring, tag-based SCADA integration, and production traceability workflows across modern shop floors. The coverage includes Twinmotion, Tulip, MachineMetrics, Ignition by Inductive Automation, FactoryTalk by Rockwell Automation, Parsec TrakSYS, SCADAforge, Fero Labs, AVEVA Production Management, and ThinkIQ.
Each tool review focuses on how configuration changes propagate, how automation and integration surfaces connect to external systems, and how governance controls handle multi-team updates. The ranking emphasizes fit signals like tag namespace consistency in Ignition, workflow routing and submission endpoints in Tulip, and traceability workflow binding in Parsec TrakSYS.
Factory Automation Software for integrating shop-floor automation, operator workflows, and operational data
Factory automation software coordinates shop-floor execution by connecting machine signals, operator inputs, and production events into configured workflows and integrations. In practice, that coordination shows up as Ignition’s unified tag system that links real-time, alarms, historian, and web HMI so changes propagate through one project configuration.
Other tools prioritize different centers of gravity. Tulip builds no-code workflow apps that collect structured operator inputs and route results through programmable integration endpoints, while MachineMetrics ties machine events to operator actions using configurable work and measurement logic. The result is a portfolio of factory automation software approaches that either centralize tag-driven SCADA scope or operationalize execution through structured workflow and event-to-action configuration.
Factory Automation Software features that determine integration control and operator execution
Factory automation software succeeds when configuration changes travel through a consistent automation surface, not when teams duplicate tag mappings and workflow logic across systems. The strongest tools tie real-time signals, operator actions, and event outcomes to the same configuration so runtime behavior stays predictable during updates.
This guide evaluates features that show up in day-to-day operations. Those include tag namespace consistency in Ignition, workflow routing and structured operator submissions in Tulip, event-to-action dashboarding with configurable logic in MachineMetrics, centralized runtime coordination in FactoryTalk Services Platform, and production traceability workflow binding in Parsec TrakSYS.
Tag namespace consistency and propagation across SCADA-style layers
Ignition by Inductive Automation uses a unified Ignition tag system that links real-time, alarms, historian, and web HMI so a configuration change propagates through one project configuration. FactoryTalk by Rockwell Automation coordinates security and runtime coordination across FactoryTalk applications to keep operator displays and alarms aligned with Rockwell controller tag structures.
Structured workflow apps with submission and integration endpoints
Tulip builds no-code workflow apps that collect structured operator inputs and route results through programmable integration endpoints. MachineMetrics ties machine events to operator actions through configurable work and measurement logic that produces consistent reporting.
Event-driven monitoring that connects machine signals to operator outcomes
MachineMetrics provides event-driven dashboards that tie machine signals to operational outcomes and then connects monitoring to guided shop-floor execution. SCADAforge links automation rules directly to point states so live values and state changes can trigger exports for integration.
Governed change control for automation configuration releases
Fero Labs emphasizes change-controlled deployment of automation configurations tied to user permissions and audit visibility across updates. Ignition can still require careful project organization and module versioning at scale, which makes governance discipline part of how configuration changes are maintained.
End-to-end production traceability workflow binding
Parsec TrakSYS includes built-in traceability and quality execution workflows tied to asset and production events, which reduces custom integration work for end-to-end traceability. AVEVA Production Management focuses on managed production execution workflows that bind operator actions, work status, and performance outputs into one controlled operational timeline.
How to choose Factory Automation Software by integration surface and governance depth
Choosing factory automation software is mainly a choice about where automation logic lives and what the system uses as the configuration authority. Some tools center on tag-based engineering so real-time, alarms, historian, and web HMI share one tag system, while others center on workflow execution apps where operator inputs are structured and routed to integration endpoints.
The next steps separate those approaches so evaluation moves beyond feature checklists. The decision points below also account for how multi-team changes are governed, how deployments coordinate runtime components, and how event logic maps from machine signals to operator outcomes.
Decide the configuration authority: tag engineering or workflow execution apps
If the plant model should stay consistent across real-time, alarms, historian, and web HMI, Ignition’s unified tag system is the center of gravity. If the plant model should stay consistent through structured operator work instructions and submission endpoints, Tulip’s workflow app approach becomes the configuration authority.
Map event-to-action needs to the tool’s execution pattern
If machine events must drive guided shop-floor execution with configurable work and measurement logic, MachineMetrics connects event-driven dashboards to workflow execution. If rules must trigger directly from point state changes with programmatic exports, SCADAforge ties automation rules to point states and live values.
Evaluate multi-service coordination and role separation requirements
If multiple FactoryTalk applications must share a coordinated runtime and security model for alarms and operator displays, FactoryTalk Services Platform centralizes security, configuration services, and runtime coordination. If the focus is controlled release of automation configuration with audit visibility across updates, Fero Labs uses change-controlled deployment tied to user permissions.
Use traceability as the workflow backbone when quality and production must stay linked
If traceability and quality execution steps must be tied to asset and production events with configurable operator workflows, Parsec TrakSYS is built for that workflow binding. If execution must include a managed operational timeline that ties operator actions to enterprise integration for status propagation, AVEVA Production Management supports controlled production execution timelines.
Pick for visualization outcomes when operator review needs outrank control logic
If the highest priority is interactive plant visualization for walkthroughs and operator reviews without requiring native plant tag synchronization, Twinmotion converts imported industrial geometry into editable real-time walkthrough media. If operator responses must be driven from detected sensor events with analytics workflows instead of replacing SCADA or PLC control logic, ThinkIQ focuses on event-to-action analytics and automated operational responses.
Who Factory Automation Software buyers should match to tool strengths
Factory automation software buyers usually split into teams that need tag-centered runtime coordination, teams that need structured operator workflows, and teams that need traceability and quality execution tied to production events. The strongest fit depends on which workflow artifacts must remain consistent during updates.
The audience segments below match common shop-floor constraints to the specific tool behaviors described in each card.
Operations and engineering teams that require one tag namespace across HMI, alarms, and historian
Ignition’s unified tag system links real-time, alarms, historian, and web HMI so configuration changes propagate consistently, which reduces drift across runtime components.
Manufacturing teams that need structured operator work instructions with integration-driven automation
Tulip’s workflow apps capture structured operator inputs and route results through programmable integration endpoints, which supports traceable data capture through external systems.
Teams that need event-to-action dashboards that connect machine signals to guided execution
MachineMetrics pairs event-driven dashboards with workflow configuration that connects monitoring to guided shop-floor execution while producing consistent reporting.
Manufacturers standardizing around Rockwell PLC controller tag structures and centralized runtime coordination
FactoryTalk Services Platform centralizes security, configuration services, and runtime coordination across FactoryTalk applications while aligning with Rockwell controller tag structures.
Plants that need production traceability and quality execution steps bound to asset and production events
Parsec TrakSYS provides built-in traceability and quality execution workflows tied to asset and production events with configurable operator steps.
Common Factory Automation Software mistakes that cause integration failure or governance drift
Factory automation mistakes usually appear when teams evaluate features in isolation instead of validating how configuration changes propagate at runtime. Several tools can look similar during demos, but their integration surfaces and governance mechanics create different operational outcomes.
The pitfalls below match the concrete weaknesses and constraints stated in the tool cards.
Assuming tag synchronization exists when the visualization tool has no native plant tag database or direct PLC-to-visual synchronization
Twinmotion supports fast real-time visualization edits for imported industrial geometry, but it does not provide a native plant tag database or direct PLC-to-visual synchronization, so it needs a separate integration path for live plant data.
Placing PLC control logic inside a workflow layer that is designed for operator workflows rather than controller logic
Tulip’s PLC control logic remains outside Tulip and must be implemented elsewhere, so evaluation should confirm where controller logic runs and how it connects to Tulip submissions.
Underestimating the work required to map tags and event rules into correct monitoring and metrics outputs
MachineMetrics needs initial tag and rules mapping for accurate metrics, so rollout planning must include time for mapping validation and edge-case configuration beyond basic rollups.
Choosing a governance-heavy platform without planning for multi-service maintenance effort
Ignition can raise maintenance effort at scale due to project organization and module versioning, so governance planning must cover project structure and versioning discipline rather than only access controls.
Expecting a traceability workflow tool to provide broad connector coverage without connector and data handoff validation
Parsec TrakSYS integration breadth depends heavily on the specific connector and data handoff path, so the production and quality traceability workflow should be validated end-to-end with the intended handoff data sources.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated each factory automation software tool against integration depth and automation surface, focusing on how configuration changes propagate across runtime components and how automation and API surfaces connect to external systems. Features accounted for 40% of the score, ease of setup and operational usability accounted for 30%, and value for the intended automation scope accounted for the remaining 30%. Twinmotion separated itself by delivering real-time visualization editing that turns imported industrial geometry into walkthrough media quickly, which matched the visualization-first automation review workflows described in its card.
Frequently Asked Questions About Factory Automation Software
How do Tulip and Ignition differ when integrating shop-floor events into external systems?
Which tools in this list use a tag-based data model as a central integration primitive?
How does OSIsoft PI compare with Ignition when operational history and downtime analysis are required?
What breaks if a factory team tries to use Tulip for edge-level control logic instead of operator workflow automation?
How do MachineMetrics and AVEVA Production Management handle shift-based visibility across throughput and operations?
When multiple teams need controlled changes, how do Eero Labs and Parsec TrakSYS differ in admin controls and auditability?
How does Ignition support extensibility compared with SCADAforge-style integrations?
How do ThinkIQ and IBM Maximo differ in turning live plant data into actionable operational workflows?
Where does Rockwell Automation FactoryTalk tend to fit short if a plant needs non-Rockwell or cross-vendor PLC abstraction?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Funding and competing interests
This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.
They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.
Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →
- AI In IndustryTop 10 Best Digital Factory Software of 2026
- AI In IndustryTop 10 Best Artificial Intelligence Automation Software of 2026
- Business Process OutsourcingTop 10 Best Automated Document Factory Software of 2026
- AI In IndustryTop 10 Best Automation Technology Services of 2026
- Digital Transformation In IndustryTop 10 Best Automation Integration Services of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
AI In Industry alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of ai in industry tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare ai in industry tools→