
GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Environment EnergyTop 10 Best Energy Contract Management Software of 2026
Ranked energy contract management software for utilities, with features, selection criteria, and tradeoffs assessed across listed tools.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
GenieAI is the strongest overall pick for renewable developers and utilities negotiating complex energy agreements across jurisdictions, while Icertis suits enterprise teams that need governed contract data spanning procurement, legal, sales, and core systems.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
GenieAI
The whole project stack is reasoned about together, so a grid connection agreement, an EPC contract and a PPA are assessed against one another. Defined terms, cross-references and liability positions stay connected across documents that will outlive the people who negotiated them.
Built for renewable developers, independent power producers, EPC contractors and asset owners whose commercial teams negotiate project contracts continuously and cannot route every document through legal..
Icertis
Editor pickIcertis’ configurable contract intelligence data model links clauses, obligations, entities, and commercial terms for cross-contract analysis.
Built for fits when utilities need governed contract data across procurement, legal, sales, and enterprise systems..
Contruent
Editor pickChange management links amendments, commitments, forecasts, and schedule effects inside the same capital-project record.
Built for fits when utilities need contract controls tied to large construction and infrastructure programs..
Related reading
Comparison Table
GenieAI
Agentic AI contract drafting and review platformGenieAI uses specialized AI agents to draft, review, edit, negotiate, and research contracts from plain-English instructions, templates, prior agreements, and company-specific standards.
The whole project stack is reasoned about together, so a grid connection agreement, an EPC contract and a PPA are assessed against one another. Defined terms, cross-references and liability positions stay connected across documents that will outlive the people who negotiated them.
A renewable development is a chain of interdependent contracts. Land options lead to grid connection agreements, which shape the EPC contract, which has to support what the power purchase agreement promises an offtaker. A term accepted in one document can quietly break an obligation in another, and the discovery usually comes years later.
GenieAI drafts and reviews these agreements against positions your business has set, and assesses each in the context of the others, so conflicts surface during negotiation rather than during a dispute. Availability guarantees, liquidated damages, curtailment, change in law, termination and step-in rights are the provisions that decide whether a project makes money, and they are what the review concentrates on.
Project-based commercial teams negotiate every agreement, which is exactly where AI assessment tends to be accurate but inconsistent. Holding standards centrally is what fixes that. ISO 27001 certified, no training on customer data, and 150+ jurisdictions for cross-border development.
- +Covers the agreements renewable developers actually sign: PPAs, grid connection, EPC, O&M and land options.
- +Assesses each document against the rest of the project stack, so conflicts appear during negotiation rather than in a dispute.
- +Extracts long-dated obligations and milestone dates into sortable tables across an entire portfolio.
- +ISO 27001 certified, does not train on customer data, 150+ jurisdictions for cross-border development.
- –Project risk positions drive everything downstream, so those come first. GenieAI derives a starting set from project agreements you have already signed and refines them with you, so it is a guided exercise rather than a blank playbook to fill in.
- –Not an asset performance, SCADA or energy trading system, so it sits alongside those.
- –Centred on drafting, review and negotiation rather than signature execution.
- –Not aimed at law firm matter management or billing.
Development teams
Negotiating a power purchase agreement
Project economics protected at negotiation
Project delivery
Aligning EPC and O&M with the head agreements
Fewer retained risk gaps down the chain
Show 2 more scenarios
Asset managers
Tracking decades-long obligations
Fewer missed deadlines on long-lived assets
Availability guarantees, milestone dates and reporting duties are extracted into sortable tables across every project held.
In-house legal at developers
Supporting continuous negotiation
Legal reviews the exceptions, not everything
Standards are set once for recurring agreement types, so routine terms clear automatically and only genuine exceptions escalate.
Best for: Renewable developers, independent power producers, EPC contractors and asset owners whose commercial teams negotiate project contracts continuously and cannot route every document through legal.
Icertis
enterpriseIcertis manages contract creation, obligations, approvals, compliance, and renewals across enterprise departments.
Icertis’ configurable contract intelligence data model links clauses, obligations, entities, and commercial terms for cross-contract analysis.
Large utilities can model supply, sales, procurement, and partner agreements with different templates, approval paths, clause rules, and metadata fields. Icertis Explore supports cross-contract search and analysis, while Icertis Copilots assist with summarization, drafting, and clause-level review. The architecture suits organizations that need one governed contract record across business units and jurisdictions.
Implementation requires careful taxonomy design, template governance, integration mapping, and migration of legacy documents. Icertis does not provide a specialized energy trading workspace for nominations, dispatch, or imbalance settlement, so those processes remain in adjacent systems. It fits procurement, legal, and commercial teams that need centralized obligation tracking across high contract volumes.
- +Configurable data model supports varied agreement types and business-specific metadata
- +Prebuilt integrations cover SAP, Salesforce, Microsoft, and other enterprise systems
- +Copilots assist with contract summaries, drafting, and clause analysis
- +Granular permissions and audit histories support regulated operating models
- –Implementation demands substantial taxonomy, template, and integration governance
- –Energy trading operations require adjacent systems for nominations and dispatch
- –Advanced analytics depend on consistent metadata and extracted contract data
- –User experience can feel administratively dense for occasional business users
Utility procurement teams
Supplier agreement approvals
Controlled approvals and obligations
Renewable procurement teams
PPA approval and amendments
Faster agreement governance
Show 2 more scenarios
Energy legal departments
Contract abstraction and review
Faster legal review
Icertis Copilots extract key terms and summarize clauses for review within governed workflows.
Enterprise integration teams
ERP contract synchronization
Fewer disconnected records
APIs and packaged connectors synchronize approved contract data with ERP and CRM records.
Best for: Fits when utilities need governed contract data across procurement, legal, sales, and enterprise systems.
Contruent
enterpriseEnterprise contract management software for capital-intensive projects.
Change management links amendments, commitments, forecasts, and schedule effects inside the same capital-project record.
Contruent links contract records to project cost and schedule data instead of treating documents as isolated files. Teams can manage amendments, approvals, vendor deliverables, notices, payment workflows, and commercial exposure within the same project-control environment. Configurable workflows, role-based permissions, and audit histories support governance across owners, contractors, and engineering firms.
The main tradeoff is category scope. Contruent is better suited to capital-project agreements than to retail supply contracts, market nominations, meter settlement, or renewable certificate portfolios. A utility building a substation can use Contruent to control contractor changes and commitments, while a power procurement desk may need a separate energy trading or contract lifecycle system.
- +Connects contract changes with project cost and schedule impacts
- +Supports configurable approvals, permissions, and audit histories
- +Handles commitments, invoices, amendments, and vendor correspondence together
- +Provides API access and ERP integration options
- –Does not target wholesale energy trading workflows
- –Implementation requires structured project and contract configuration
- –Commodity price, nomination, and settlement functions are not central
- –Smaller procurement teams may find the capital-project model excessive
Utility capital program teams
Managing transmission construction contracts
Earlier commercial variance detection
Generation project owners
Controlling EPC contract changes
Controlled EPC changes
Show 2 more scenarios
Infrastructure procurement groups
Tracking supplier obligations
Fewer missed deliverables
Teams can assign deliverables, monitor due dates, and connect supplier correspondence with contract records and project milestones.
Project finance controllers
Reconciling contractor commitments
Cleaner project forecasts
Controllers can compare contract values, invoices, approved changes, and forecasts against connected financial-system data.
Best for: Fits when utilities need contract controls tied to large construction and infrastructure programs.
LinkSquares
SMBAI-powered contract lifecycle management platform.
Analyze’s AI-generated summaries and extracted fields provide a fast first pass over uploaded agreements.
LinkSquares brings AI-assisted contract abstraction into a general-purpose contract repository, not an energy-market operations suite. Analyze extracts key terms, dates, parties, and obligations from uploaded agreements, while Finalize manages metadata, approvals, reminders, and search.
LinkSquares Sign handles electronic signatures, and API access supports connected workflows and reporting. The product fits legal and procurement teams managing commercial agreements, but energy operations still need separate systems for dispatch, settlement, and forecasting.
- +AI extraction identifies dates, parties, renewal language, and selected clauses in uploaded agreements.
- +Structured metadata supports organization-specific sorting, filtering, and reporting.
- +Public API supports programmatic access for connected workflows and reporting.
- +LinkSquares Sign keeps signature requests inside the contract workspace.
- –No native energy-market calculations cover dispatch, settlement, or forecasting workflows.
- –Clause extraction requires human review for unusual definitions and heavily negotiated language.
- –Integration projects can require API mapping beyond packaged connectors.
- –Reporting quality depends on consistent metadata configuration across imported agreements.
Best for: Fits when legal and procurement teams need AI-assisted review and workflow control for commercial agreements.
Quorum Software
vertical specialistQuorum Software supports commercial contract workflows for energy industry operations.
Contract-to-cash linkage connects commercial terms with volumes, prices, and settlement data across Quorum energy applications.
Quorum Software links energy contract terms with volumes, prices, and settlement data across operational and accounting workflows. Core capabilities include agreement storage, approval routing, amendments, obligation tracking, and contract-related reporting.
Integration with Quorum land, production, and accounting applications gives energy companies a connected operating context. Coverage for external APIs, renewable instruments, and complex wholesale structures is less clearly defined.
- +Links contract terms to volumes, prices, and settlement calculations.
- +Supports configurable approval workflows and electronic document storage.
- +Integrates with Quorum accounting, land, and production applications.
- +Centralized contract repository supports structured search and controlled access.
- –Public product materials provide limited detail on REST API coverage and webhook support.
- –Complex contract structures can require Quorum implementation expertise.
- –Contract abstraction depth for scanned legacy agreements is not clearly documented.
- –External reporting may depend on Quorum modules and customer-specific integrations.
Best for: Fits when energy companies need contract workflows tied to Quorum accounting and operational data.
ContractSafe
SMBCloud-based contract repository with search and alerting.
Date-based alert automation links reminders to custom fields, counterparties, renewal dates, and other contract events.
ContractSafe gives small and midsize legal, procurement, and operations teams a searchable contract repository centered on custom fields and date alerts rather than complex authoring workflows. It supports bulk uploads, full-text search, permission controls, document versioning, reporting, and signature requests through integrations such as DocuSign.
Automated notice management can track renewal and expiration dates, while Salesforce, Slack, cloud-storage, and Zapier connections extend basic workflow automation. Energy companies still need separate systems for market operations, meter data, specialized clause analysis, and deep ERP integration.
- +Custom fields capture counterparties, renewal dates, departments, and contract categories.
- +Saved searches and filters reduce retrieval time across large document collections.
- +Automated reminders support notice management for renewals and obligations.
- +DocuSign, Salesforce, Slack, storage services, and Zapier extend basic workflows.
- –No native energy operations connectors beyond general business integrations.
- –Approval routing and negotiation controls are less configurable than enterprise CLM suites.
- –ERP integration often requires external connectors or custom development.
- –Reporting lacks specialized analysis for energy quantities, pricing formulas, and settlement calculations.
Best for: Fits when legal and procurement teams need a searchable contract archive with configurable reminders and modest workflow demands.
Quorum Energy Components
vertical specialistEnergy industry software for contract management, nominations, pricing, settlement, and accounting.
Configurable commodity pricing and settlement engine connects contract formulas to transaction-level financial outcomes.
Quorum Energy Components combines commodity contract administration with the operational and financial processing of energy trades. It stores deal terms, pricing formulas, delivery periods, volumes, and counterparties, then applies those values to movements, invoices, and settlement calculations.
Configurable workflows support approvals, amendments, and status controls, while connections to accounting and trading systems extend transaction coverage. The product fits physical commodity organizations better than teams seeking a document-first legal CLM workspace.
- +Captures commodity contracts with formula pricing, delivery terms, and volume commitments.
- +Links deals to nominations, movements, invoices, and settlement records.
- +Supports configurable workflows for approvals, amendments, and contract status changes.
- +Connects operational transactions with accounting and reporting processes.
- –Focuses on commodity operations rather than broad legal CLM administration.
- –User experience can feel dense for teams without energy trading expertise.
- –Document collaboration and clause authoring are less central than transaction processing.
- –Implementation depends on mapping complex pricing, movement, and accounting rules.
Best for: Fits when commodity teams need contract records tied directly to physical transactions and settlement workflows.
Icertis Contract Management
enterpriseEnterprise contract lifecycle management software for authoring, obligation tracking, compliance, and renewals.
Icertis Explore AI identifies clauses, risks, and obligations across large contract collections.
Icertis Contract Management centers on a configurable contract intelligence model that connects legal, procurement, sales, and finance processes. AI-assisted contract abstraction, clause analysis, obligation tracking, approvals, electronic signatures, and repository controls cover core lifecycle work. REST APIs and connectors for SAP, Salesforce, Microsoft, and other enterprise systems support ERP integration, while energy dispatch and settlement remain outside its native scope.
- +Configurable contract types, metadata, clauses, and approvals accommodate complex enterprise agreements.
- +Native connectors and APIs connect workflows with SAP, Salesforce, Microsoft, and procurement applications.
- +Icertis Explore AI identifies clauses, risks, and obligations across uploaded contract collections.
- +Role-based permissions, version history, and reporting support controlled access and review.
- –Implementation requires specialist configuration for taxonomies, workflows, integrations, and permissions.
- –Physical power operations and market balancing require adjacent systems.
- –Complex data models can make administrator training and change control demanding.
- –Energy contract templates and market-specific clause logic need customer configuration.
Best for: Fits when multinational utilities need governed contract intelligence connected to ERP and CRM systems.
FIS Quantum
enterpriseEnergy and commodities trading software with contract capture, valuation, settlement, and risk management.
Quantum's integrated treasury, liquidity, and market-risk workbench
FIS Quantum is a treasury and risk management suite rather than a dedicated energy contract lifecycle management product. Its modules cover cash, liquidity, payments, financial instruments, valuation, and market-risk processes within a configurable finance environment. Utilities can use it to manage financial exposure connected to energy activity, but energy-specific clauses, delivery obligations, certificates, and contract notices require separate systems or custom configuration.
- +Connects treasury, cash, liquidity, and market-risk processes in one finance environment.
- +Supports configurable workflows, permissions, reporting, and approval controls.
- +Handles complex financial instruments and valuation workflows beyond basic contract storage.
- +Can connect finance operations with ERP, banking, and payment environments.
- –No clearly documented native model for energy clauses, volumes, certificates, or delivery obligations.
- –Contract abstraction and renewal notices are not primary workflows.
- –Energy market data feeds require separate architecture or custom integration.
- –Implementation requires treasury expertise and substantial configuration.
Best for: Fits when utility finance teams need treasury and risk controls around energy exposure, not dedicated contract lifecycle management.
ION Endur
enterpriseEnergy trading and risk management software that manages physical and financial commodity contracts.
Endur's configurable deal model links transaction capture, valuation, risk, and settlement logic across complex energy positions.
ION Endur suits utilities and energy traders managing complex physical and financial positions, but ranks tenth because contract administration is secondary to trading operations. Its distinct capability is a configurable deal model for transaction capture, valuation, position management, settlements, and risk controls across power and gas markets.
Endur can represent wholesale power purchase agreements and connect operational workflows such as nomination and scheduling with trading and risk data. The product is less suitable for teams seeking document authoring, clause management, and approval workflows in one dedicated application.
- +Configurable deal models represent physical and financial energy transactions.
- +Valuation and risk calculations run against captured deal data.
- +Front-, middle-, and back-office workflows share a common transaction record.
- +Integration options connect settlement outputs with ERP systems.
- –Document authoring and clause-library functions are not the product's central workflow.
- –User administration and configuration typically require specialist implementation skills.
- –Interface complexity can slow adoption for teams focused only on contract administration.
- –Electronic signing is not a primary Endur capability.
Best for: Fits when large utilities need trading-system controls for complex energy transactions rather than a document-first contract workspace.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 environment energy, GenieAI stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right energy contract management software
This guide compares GenieAI, Icertis, Contruent, LinkSquares, Quorum Software, ContractSafe, Quorum Energy Components, Icertis Contract Management, FIS Quantum, and ION Endur.
The ranking weighs contract data structures, integration and API coverage, automation, governance controls, and energy operations. GenieAI leads for AI-assisted drafting across complex agreements, while Quorum Energy Components connects commodity formulas with transactions and settlement records.
What energy contract management software controls across agreements and transactions
Energy contract management software stores agreements, extracts commercial terms, routes approvals, tracks obligations, and manages renewal or expiration events. Enterprise platforms can connect contract records with ERP, CRM, procurement, accounting, and operational systems.
GenieAI applies persistent context to clauses, figures, cross-references, and negotiation history across complex energy agreements. Quorum Energy Components links formula pricing, delivery terms, volume commitments, nominations, invoices, and settlement records to physical commodity transactions.
Evaluation criteria for energy contract management software
Contract coverage must match the agreements and operating processes that a utility manages. GenieAI handles PPAs, EPC, O&M, offtake, and joint venture agreements, while Quorum Energy Components captures commodity pricing, delivery terms, and volume commitments.
Integration depth determines whether contract terms remain isolated or reach enterprise and operational systems. Icertis connects contract records with SAP, Salesforce, Microsoft, and procurement applications, while Quorum Software links terms with volumes, prices, and settlement calculations.
Agreement drafting and clause extraction
GenieAI retains clauses, figures, cross-references, and negotiation history across multi-document deals. LinkSquares Analyze extracts dates, parties, renewal language, and selected clauses from uploaded agreements, but unusual definitions require human review.
Contract data model and enterprise integration
Icertis links clauses, obligations, entities, and commercial terms for cross-contract analysis through a configurable contract intelligence model. Icertis Contract Management adds connectors and APIs for SAP, Salesforce, Microsoft, and procurement applications.
Commodity transaction and settlement linkage
Quorum Software connects commercial terms with volumes, prices, and settlement calculations across Quorum energy applications. Quorum Energy Components links formula pricing and delivery commitments to nominations, movements, invoices, and settlement records.
Project change and commercial impact control
Contruent connects amendments with commitments, forecasts, and schedule effects inside a capital-project record. ION Endur instead links transaction capture with valuation, risk, and settlement logic for complex physical and financial energy positions.
Repository search, alerts, and finance controls
ContractSafe uses custom fields, saved searches, and date-based alerts for counterparties, renewal dates, departments, and contract categories. FIS Quantum focuses on treasury, liquidity, cash, and market-risk workflows rather than clause abstraction or renewal notices.
Choose by document control, transaction processing, and integration architecture
The first decision separates document-centered platforms from transaction-centered systems. GenieAI and LinkSquares prioritize drafting or extraction, while Quorum Energy Components and ION Endur organize contract or deal records around physical and financial transactions.
The second decision concerns operating ownership and governance depth. Icertis and Icertis Contract Management suit shared enterprise administration, Contruent suits project controls, and FIS Quantum suits finance teams managing energy exposure.
Select a document-first or transaction-first operating model
Choose GenieAI when negotiators need persistent context across complex agreements and plain-English drafting. Choose Quorum Energy Components or ION Endur when commodity formulas, transaction capture, valuation, or settlement logic must drive daily operations.
Match the information model to the operating structure
Choose Icertis for shared contract records that connect clauses, obligations, entities, and commercial terms across departments. Choose Contruent when amendments, commitments, forecasts, and schedule effects belong inside capital-project records.
Separate operational integration from legal workflow coverage
Choose Quorum Software when contract terms must connect with Quorum accounting and operational records. Choose LinkSquares when legal and procurement teams need uploaded-agreement extraction, structured metadata, and workflow control without native dispatch or settlement calculations.
Assign ownership to finance, trading, legal, or procurement
Choose FIS Quantum for treasury, liquidity, cash, and market-risk ownership. Choose Icertis Contract Management for enterprise legal and procurement ownership across configurable contract types, clauses, approvals, and connected business applications.
Test integration controls before approving the architecture
Validate API objects, authentication, event handling, field mapping, and audit records with the target ERP, CRM, procurement, accounting, or energy system. Quorum Software has limited publicly documented REST API and webhook detail, so its integration review requires direct technical validation.
Audience fit across utility contract and energy operations teams
Utilities with complex agreements need different controls from commodity desks that process physical transactions. GenieAI supports negotiated energy agreements, while Quorum Energy Components supports transaction-linked commodity workflows.
Enterprise ownership also changes the selection criteria. Icertis supports shared governance across departments, Contruent connects commercial controls to infrastructure programs, and ContractSafe covers searchable archives with configurable event reminders.
Renewable developers and energy buyers
GenieAI supports PPA, EPC, O&M, offtake, and joint venture drafting across jurisdictions. Plain-English briefs can generate initial drafts without rigid intake forms.
Multinational utilities with shared enterprise controls
Icertis and Icertis Contract Management support configurable contract types, metadata, clauses, approvals, permissions, and connections to SAP, Salesforce, Microsoft, and procurement applications.
Commodity trading and settlement teams
Quorum Energy Components captures formula pricing, delivery terms, and volume commitments, then links deals to nominations, movements, invoices, and settlement records. ION Endur adds valuation and risk calculations for captured physical and financial positions.
Infrastructure program and capital-project teams
Contruent connects contract changes with project cost and schedule impacts. Its configurable approvals, permissions, and audit histories support project-centered commercial control.
Common errors in energy contract software selection
A searchable agreement archive does not provide commodity settlement, dispatch, or market-risk processing. ContractSafe and LinkSquares support document workflows, while Quorum Energy Components and ION Endur address transaction-centered operations.
Enterprise contract intelligence also requires more than importing files. Icertis and Icertis Contract Management depend on defined taxonomies, templates, workflows, integrations, and permissions before cross-contract reporting can operate consistently.
Treating document extraction as energy operations processing
Use LinkSquares or GenieAI for review and drafting, then verify that a separate system handles dispatch, nominations, forecasting, settlement, or balancing. Quorum Energy Components and ION Endur provide transaction-oriented processing that document-first tools do not.
Choosing a transaction platform for clause-heavy legal work
ION Endur centers on deal models, valuation, risk, and settlement logic. Select GenieAI, Icertis, or Icertis Contract Management when document authoring, clause configuration, approvals, and contract intelligence are central requirements.
Ignoring implementation ownership for configurable enterprise platforms
Assign owners for taxonomy, templates, metadata, permissions, workflow rules, and integration mappings before selecting Icertis. Contruent also requires structured project and contract configuration for reliable change-impact control.
Approving integrations without testing event and field behavior
Test API coverage, webhook behavior, authentication, error handling, and downstream field mappings with production-like records. Quorum Software has limited publicly documented REST API and webhook coverage, which makes technical validation a selection requirement.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated GenieAI, Icertis, Contruent, LinkSquares, Quorum Software, ContractSafe, Quorum Energy Components, Icertis Contract Management, FIS Quantum, and ION Endur across contract features, ease of use, and value. Features received 40% of the ranking, while ease of use and value received 30% each.
We assessed contract coverage, data structures, integration surfaces, automation, governance controls, and connections to energy operations. GenieAI ranked first because Eidetic Intelligence preserves clauses, figures, cross-references, negotiation history, and organizational preferences across complex multi-document energy agreements.
Frequently Asked Questions About energy contract management software
Which energy contract management software fits a utility that needs ERP and CRM integration?
How do these platforms handle security and administrative control?
What breaks if a utility uses a document repository for energy contracts without operational integration?
When should a utility choose Quorum Energy Components or ION Endur instead of a document-first CLM platform?
Can these products migrate contracts from shared drives and legacy repositories?
Which tools support AI-assisted contract abstraction and negotiation?
How extensible are the integrations for custom energy workflows?
Which platform fits capital-project contracts rather than retail energy or wholesale power agreements?
What should teams configure first when implementing energy contract management software?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Environment Energy alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of environment energy tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare environment energy tools→