Commissioned Research
Top 10 Best Employee Absence Software of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE REVIEW

HR In Industry

Top 10 Best Employee Absence Software of 2026

A research roundup comparing employee absence software options, including Hibob and Sage HR, to help HR teams shortlist tools for leave tracking.

20 min readUpdated Editorially scoped research
How we ranked these tools
01Editorial Scope

Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.

02Source Research

Search agents gather the source set and the review record, including transcriptions of video reviews and podcasts.

Read our full methodology →

Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page. This does not influence our reviews. Editorial policy

Employee absence software centralizes leave requests, approvals, and balance tracking into a defined HR data model with auditable state changes. This comparison helps HR teams weigh automation depth against configuration effort, especially when integrating absence workflows with payroll, shift planning, and workforce scheduling.

Hibob is the best pick for HR teams needing policy-driven absence approvals because its workflow routing uses employee attributes across locations and policies while keeping an audit trail of approvals and record changes; UKG Pro is a strong alternative for established enterprise HR thanks to its configurable routing within its HRIS context and consolidated absence data.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

Hibob

Workflow-driven approvals that use employee attributes for dynamic routing across locations and policies.

Best for: Fits when HR teams need policy-driven absence approvals tied to system integrations and audit trails.

2

Sage HR

Editor pick

Configurable approval workflows with action-level audit trails across the absence request lifecycle.

Best for: Fits when HR teams need auditable approval workflows and calendar visibility across multiple absence types.

3

UKG Pro

Editor pick

Configurable absence approval workflows that follow organizational routing rules inside UKG Pro’s HRIS context.

Best for: Fits when established HR teams need policy-controlled leave approvals tied to HR records and enterprise integrations.

Comparison Table

1
HibobBest overall
SMB
9.0/10
Overall
2
8.8/10
Overall
3
Enterprise
8.6/10
Overall
4
8.3/10
Overall
5
8.1/10
Overall
6
7.9/10
Overall
7
7.6/10
Overall
8
7.2/10
Overall
9
6.8/10
Overall
10
Enterprise
6.5/10
Overall
#1

Hibob

SMB

HR platform with attendance and leave management.

9.0/10
Overall
Features9.0/10
Ease of Use9.0/10
Value9.0/10
Standout feature

Workflow-driven approvals that use employee attributes for dynamic routing across locations and policies.

Hibob can centralize time-off requests, approval workflows, and calendar visibility so managers review absences in-context rather than across separate tools. The rules engine supports policy-driven decisioning such as eligibility conditions and approval routing by employee attributes. The system records who changed what and when, which helps when HR needs audit trails for disputes.

A key tradeoff is that organizations with highly custom absence logic often need more configuration time to model their policy variants cleanly. Hibob fits teams that want absence tracking to connect to existing HRIS or workflow automations through API-driven integrations rather than manual exports. It also works well when managers need an approval experience that follows consistent governance instead of email-based approvals.

Pros
  • +Configurable approval workflows for time-off requests reduce email routing
  • +Audit history tracks absence record changes and approvals for governance
  • +API access supports absence data synchronization with HR and payroll systems
  • +Manager views consolidate absence calendars and pending decisions
Cons
  • –Complex policies can require significant configuration effort upfront
  • –Advanced approval routing depends on available employee attributes and setup
  • –Some absence reporting needs data export for custom analytics work
  • –Workflow changes can affect multiple rulesets and require careful testing
Use scenarios
  • HR ops teams

    Route time-off requests by policy rules

    Fewer exceptions and faster approvals

  • People managers

    Review absence calendar and approve requests

    Lower approval cycle time

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Integrations teams

    Sync absence events to downstream systems

    Less manual reconciliation

    An API supports automated data movement for absence records and statuses.

  • Compliance-focused HR

    Maintain audit trails for disputes

    Quicker issue resolution

    Action history records approvals and changes to absence entries for traceability.

Best for: Fits when HR teams need policy-driven absence approvals tied to system integrations and audit trails.

#2

Sage HR

SMB

HR software featuring leave management and shift planning.

8.8/10
Overall
Features8.8/10
Ease of Use8.7/10
Value8.9/10
Standout feature

Configurable approval workflows with action-level audit trails across the absence request lifecycle.

Sage HR covers absence tracking with request capture, approval workflows, and calendar views used for day-by-day visibility. It also supports entitlement and reporting needs through HRIS integration points and standardized reporting outputs. Admin controls support structured governance via configurable absence types and workflow settings, with audit trails that record key actions.

A notable tradeoff is that advanced workforce scheduling integration and payroll impact often depend on the surrounding Sage HR integration setup rather than a single native feed. Sage HR works well when HR needs consistent leave request intake, manager approval routing, and auditable records for internal compliance checks.

Pros
  • +Absence requests route through configurable approval workflows and recorded decisions
  • +Absence calendar views support fast cross-team visibility for managers and HR
  • +Audit trails capture key absence lifecycle events for governance and review
  • +Consistent absence type configuration supports predictable reporting outputs
Cons
  • –Deep payroll impact may require additional integration configuration
  • –Complex leave rule sets can take time to set up correctly
Use scenarios
  • HR operations teams

    Standardize leave requests and approvals

    Fewer approval disputes

  • People managers

    Coordinate coverage using absence calendar

    Improved staffing coverage

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Compliance-focused HR

    Review audit history for decisions

    Better internal traceability

    Compliance teams use audit trails to verify who approved or changed absences and when actions occurred.

  • HRIS administrators

    Connect absence data to HR records

    Lower reporting duplication

    HRIS admins align absence tracking outputs with HR records to support consistent reporting across systems.

Best for: Fits when HR teams need auditable approval workflows and calendar visibility across multiple absence types.

#3

UKG Pro

Enterprise

Enterprise HR and payroll with leave management.

8.6/10
Overall
Features8.6/10
Ease of Use8.6/10
Value8.6/10
Standout feature

Configurable absence approval workflows that follow organizational routing rules inside UKG Pro’s HRIS context.

UKG Pro supports employee absence tracking through configurable leave types, time-off request submission, and leave approval workflows. It ties absence outcomes into broader HR processes via its HRIS core, including entitlement handling and payroll-adjacent reporting for sick leave and holiday usage.

Admins get configuration controls for absence policies and approval routing across organizational units. Integration depth shows up through UKG Pro’s HRIS and ecosystem connectors that can align absence calendars with HR and workforce systems.

Pros
  • +Configurable absence types and policy-driven approval routing
  • +Consolidated absence data inside the HRIS record model
  • +Strong integration pathways for HR and workforce scheduling workflows
  • +Audit trails support review of time-off request and decision history
Cons
  • –Workflow configuration requires governance to avoid approval rule drift
  • –Advanced absence scenarios can involve multiple configurations across modules
Use scenarios
  • HR administrators and managers

    Approve leave with entitlements and calendars

    Fewer manual absence reconciliations

  • HR service teams and employees

    Submit and update requests via self-service

    Less manual HR handling

Show 1 more scenario
  • Payroll and HR operations teams

    Align sick and holiday effects to payroll

    More consistent payroll records

    Use shared employee and absence data to process payroll-adjacent outcomes tied to leave events.

Best for: Fits when established HR teams need policy-controlled leave approvals tied to HR records and enterprise integrations.

#4

BambooHR

SMB

HR platform with built-in PTO tracking and leave management.

8.3/10
Overall
Features8.3/10
Ease of Use8.3/10
Value8.3/10
Standout feature

Manager-driven time-off approvals inside BambooHR with consistent leave balances tied to HR records.

BambooHR pairs employee data management with absence tracking workflows for time-off requests, approvals, and absence calendars. It supports HRIS-linked leave records so staff and managers can submit and review requests against configured absence types and policies.

Pros
  • +Built-in time-off request and approval workflow with manager visibility
  • +Absence records stay consistent with HRIS employee profiles and history
  • +Role-based permissions separate employee self-service from admin actions
  • +Integration options support HRIS-connected reporting for absence trends
Cons
  • –Advanced absence policy edge cases can require careful configuration
  • –Cross-system absence analytics often depend on external reporting or exports
Use scenarios
  • Distributed workforce HR teams

    Route leave approvals for remote staff

    More consistent remote administration

  • HR teams, managers, employees

    Plan annual time off with balances

    More visible absence planning

Show 1 more scenario
  • HR teams and hiring managers

    Coordinate onboarding and offboarding tasks

    Fewer missed lifecycle tasks

    Run employee arrivals and departures workflows that keep status changes tied to HR processes.

Best for: Fits when mid-size HR teams need configurable absence approvals tied to HR records.

#5

Zoho People

SMB

Cloud HR software with leave management modules.

8.1/10
Overall
Features8.1/10
Ease of Use8.1/10
Value8.1/10
Standout feature

Approval routing tied to request fields and configurable absence categories, updated in the absence calendar view.

Zoho People handles employee leave management with request forms, manager approvals, and status updates tied to an absence calendar. Configurable absence types and entitlement logic support setups like carryover and protected categories when HR rules vary by employee group. Reporting includes absence summaries and dashboards that HR can use for exception follow-up.

Pros
  • +Request-to-approval workflow is configurable per absence category
  • +Absence calendar updates with request statuses and dates
  • +HR reporting covers absence trends and entitlement views
  • +Role-based access controls separate employee, manager, and admin actions
Cons
  • –Exception handling workflows need careful setup to avoid approval gaps
  • –Complex statutory coverage often needs rules mapped by HR admins
  • –Some absence analytics require coordination with other HR modules
  • –Workflow changes can be harder to validate without test users
Use scenarios
  • HR operations teams

    Centralize time-off approvals

    Fewer manual follow-ups

  • Mid-market HR admins

    Standardize absence types and balances

    Lower policy inconsistency

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Managers

    Review exceptions and coverage

    Quicker scheduling decisions

    Approve or reject requests and see where absences fall on the team absence calendar.

  • HRIS integration teams

    Connect absence data to payroll

    Reduced re-entry work

    Use Zoho integration options to push absence-related HR data into downstream HRIS and payroll workflows.

Best for: Fits when HR wants absence requests and approvals managed within Zoho, with governance and reporting.

#6

Charlie HR

SMB

HR platform for small teams with time-off management.

7.9/10
Overall
Features7.9/10
Ease of Use7.9/10
Value7.9/10
Standout feature

Configurable approval routing tied to leave requests, including status history and change audit for HR governance.

Charlie HR is an employee absence management tool focused on structured leave requests, approvals, and absence visibility for HR and managers.

Pros
  • +Straightforward request and approval workflow for managers
  • +Absence calendars make coverage gaps easier to spot
  • +Consistent absence types to standardize reporting
  • +Clear audit trail for request and status changes
Cons
  • –Intermittent leave rules need careful configuration upfront
  • –Return-to-work planning depends on manual HR follow-up steps
  • –Calendar and reporting depth lags behind larger HRIS suite tools
  • –API coverage for absence records is limited for complex custom workflows
Use scenarios
  • HR operations teams

    Keep employee records updated during leave

    More reliable HR records

  • Employees and managers

    Request and view approved absence details

    Less HR administrative work

Show 1 more scenario
  • HR administrators

    Restrict sensitive absence access and edits

    More controlled sensitive sharing

    Limit visibility and editing rights for employee records and documents while tracking auditable changes.

Best for: Fits when HR needs controlled leave approval workflows and clear absence visibility without heavy HRIS complexity.

#7

Vacation Tracker

SMB

Simple leave management and PTO tracking tool.

7.6/10
Overall
Features7.6/10
Ease of Use7.6/10
Value7.6/10
Standout feature

Conflict-aware absence calendar that blocks overlaps during request processing based on configured coverage rules.

Vacation Tracker centralizes employee absence tracking with configurable request forms, rule-based approvals, and an absence calendar view for HR and managers. The system supports multiple absence categories, request statuses, and time-off coverage checks so teams can see conflicts before approving.

Pros
  • +Configurable request fields and approval workflow reduce manual handling
  • +Absence calendar and conflict visibility help managers avoid double-booking
  • +Request history captures approval and status transitions for operational traceability
  • +Clear separation between employee submissions and manager review reduces inbox churn
Cons
  • –Integration depth for payroll and HRIS is limited compared with broader HR suites
  • –Rule coverage for complex entitlement and protected leave scenarios can require workarounds
  • –Reporting focuses on operational views rather than deep absence analytics models
  • –Automation options outside approval workflow are limited for advanced routing needs
Use scenarios
  • HR and managers

    Approve requests with conflict checks

    Fewer scheduling surprises

  • HR teams

    Configure request forms and categories

    More consistent request handling

Show 1 more scenario
  • Admins and HR reviewers

    Review audit history for changes

    Faster HR audit review

    Use audit-style history tied to approvals and changes to support HR review workflows in employee absence software.

Best for: Fits when mid-size teams need straightforward absence requests, approvals, and calendar visibility.

#8

Deputy

SMB

Workforce scheduling and time tracking with leave management.

7.2/10
Overall
Features7.2/10
Ease of Use7.2/10
Value7.2/10
Standout feature

Absence requests inherit context from shift scheduling, enabling staffing-aware approvals inside the same workflow.

Deputy combines shift-based workforce scheduling with absence tracking, so time-off requests can tie to who is staffed when they are out. Absence workflows support manager approval paths, configurable leave types, and calendars that reduce guesswork for both employees and HR.

Pros
  • +Absence requests connect to scheduled shifts for staffing-aware decisioning
  • +Configurable leave types and approval workflow steps support consistent handling
  • +Change history and approval records clarify who authorized each outcome
  • +Integration surface aligns absence data with time and workforce records
Cons
  • –More governance effort is needed to keep leave rules consistent across teams
  • –Some absence reporting needs export or downstream processing for custom views
  • –Advanced workflow branching can feel limited versus highly bespoke processes
  • –Calendar views can become busy when many leave types and groups are active
Use scenarios
  • Field service and distributed onsite teams

    Attach checklists to shifts during time off

    More standardized handovers

  • Security and operational scheduling teams

    Manage schedule changes around absences

    Clearer duty coverage

Show 1 more scenario
  • Workforce administrators

    Enforce attendance rules with exceptions

    More consistent labor policy handling

    Use time-clock and exception workflows alongside absence tracking for consistent handling of attendance events.

Best for: Fits when HR teams want absence workflows tied to scheduling and manager approvals across multiple teams.

#9

SAP SuccessFactors

Enterprise

Enterprise HCM suite with time and leave tracking.

6.8/10
Overall
Features6.8/10
Ease of Use6.8/10
Value6.8/10
Standout feature

Absence request and entitlement processing integrates into SuccessFactors HR workflows with auditable approvals and role-scoped access controls.

SAP SuccessFactors supports enterprise absence management with configurable leave types, request workflows, and entitlement handling inside SAP HCM processes. Its integration depth with SAP landscapes and HRIS modules supports HR data alignment across recruiting, performance, and HR core.

Pros
  • +Configurable absence workflows for complex approval chains and routing
  • +Entitlement accrual and carryover logic aligns with HR administration patterns
  • +RBAC controls support role-based access for request, review, and reporting tasks
  • +Audit trails support compliance review of absence edits and decisions
Cons
  • –Workflow configuration can require specialist admin knowledge for edge cases
  • –Intermittent work patterns need careful rules setup to avoid misclassification
  • –Absence analytics depends on data mapping to HR reporting views
  • –Non-SAP HR operations may face integration planning for consistent employee IDs
Use scenarios
  • HR teams and people managers

    Route and track leave approvals

    Traceable pending and approved absences

  • HR operations and administration teams

    Coordinate routine HR workflows with HCM

    More consistent employee records

Show 1 more scenario
  • HR teams responsible for onboarding

    Manage onboarding alongside absence handling

    Structured onboarding process

    Use HCM processes to support onboarding and employee administration with absence requests inside the same environment.

Best for: Fits when enterprise HR teams need controlled workflows, entitlement logic, and SAP-aligned integrations for absence operations.

#10

AbsenceSoft

Enterprise

Enterprise leave and accommodation management software.

6.5/10
Overall
Features6.5/10
Ease of Use6.5/10
Value6.5/10
Standout feature

Rule-driven absence configuration that enforces eligibility and routing at request time.

AbsenceSoft centers absence tracking around configurable absence rules and structured approvals, with reporting built for HR review workflows. It supports time-off request submission and leave approval routing tied to absence types, including sick and other employee absence categories.

Pros
  • +Configurable absence rules drive approvals and entitlements consistently
  • +Leave approval workflow ties decisions to specific absence request records
  • +Absence calendars and analytics support day-to-day HR review
  • +Audit trails record changes across absence requests and outcomes
Cons
  • –Advanced configuration requires governance to avoid rule overlap
  • –Workflow behavior depends on how absence types and eligibility are configured
  • –Integration coverage may lag HRIS needs for organizations with complex systems
  • –Extensibility options can require extra effort compared with API-first vendors
Use scenarios
  • Managers and HR operations teams

    Identify coverage gaps on absence calendars

    Better visibility into availability

  • Employees and managers

    Submit and review time-off requests

    Clearer request decisions

Show 1 more scenario
  • Leave administrators and HR operations teams

    Track intermittent leave patterns

    More complete intermittent absence view

    Record recurring absence events and connect them to the related leave case for ongoing employee absence tracking.

Best for: Fits when HR teams want rule-based absence approvals and clear audit trails without custom development.

Conclusion

After evaluating 10 employee absence software, Hibob stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
Hibob

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

Frequently Asked Questions About Employee Absence Software

How do BambooHR and Sage HR handle leave approval workflows from request to audit visibility?
BambooHR ties time-off approvals to employee HR records and keeps approvals and leave balance changes aligned through HRIS integrations. Sage HR supports configurable approval workflows with action-level audit trails across the absence request lifecycle.
Which tool supports approval routing that changes based on request fields, not only manager hierarchy?
Zoho People can route approvals using request fields tied to configurable absence categories and keeps updates visible in the absence calendar view. Charlie HR focuses routing around leave request details with status history and change audit for HR governance.
How do Zoho People and UKG Pro connect absence data to payroll or HR core processes?
Zoho People includes integrations that support payroll-related HRIS connection needs alongside absence tracking and approvals. UKG Pro ties absence outcomes into its HRIS core, including entitlement handling and payroll-adjacent reporting for sick leave and holiday usage.
What breaks if an organization needs policy-driven entitlement logic across locations and wants approvals to follow those rules automatically?
AbsenceSoft enforces eligibility and routing at request time through rule-driven absence configuration, so cross-location eligibility stays consistent. If the workflow must react to employee attributes for dynamic routing across locations and policies, Hibob’s workflow engine model fits better than forms-only approaches.
When should HR teams choose Deputy for absence tracking instead of a standard HRIS absence module?
Deputy connects absence workflows to shift scheduling context, so time-off requests inherit who is staffed when the request is made. Teams that need staffing-aware approvals and rule-based reminders tend to prefer Deputy over tools that only operate on HR records and calendars.
How do SAP SuccessFactors and SAP-aligned HR tools provide governance for multi-approver approval chains?
SAP SuccessFactors includes RBAC controls and auditability, so role-scoped access and approval visibility work inside SAP HCM processes. UKG Pro also provides enterprise controls for absence policy configuration and approval routing across organizational units, but it is anchored in its own HRIS core.
How is multi-work-pattern coverage handled differently in Sage HR versus BambooHR?
Sage HR tracks absences across multiple work patterns and shows consolidated HR reporting for managers and HR administrators. BambooHR focuses on leave records tied to HRIS-linked data and manager-driven approvals inside BambooHR.
Which tool is best aligned for teams that need an absence calendar that blocks overlaps during request processing?
Vacation Tracker provides a conflict-aware absence calendar that blocks overlaps based on configured coverage rules. Charlie HR and Zoho People emphasize structured leave calendars and request governance, but Vacation Tracker’s conflict blocking is the explicit overlap-prevention mechanism.
What data migration and system onboarding steps matter most when moving from spreadsheets to employee absence management?
BambooHR onboarding typically starts by mapping leave records to configured absence types and tying request handling to HR records through HRIS integration. Zoho People and Sage HR both rely on configuring absence categories or rules first, then aligning existing leave balances and workflow routes so audit trails reflect the new governance model.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

How to Choose the Right Employee Absence Software

We focus on the practical differences that decide whether employee absence software stays accurate and fast when managers and HR act daily. The biggest split is usually in data model, automation and API surface, and audit log coverage for approvals and changes.

Absence data model and editable fields

Why it matters

Absence data model and editable fields determine whether real-world cases fit cleanly without workaround notes. If the schema is rigid, the system turns exceptions into manual records that don’t reconcile later.

How to check

Ask for an example absence record with multiple segments (for example, a single day that becomes partial days) and watch what edits are allowed. Also request the set of required fields for each absence type and whether custom fields can be added without breaking reports.

Approval workflow logic and routing rules

Why it matters

Approval workflow logic and routing rules control throughput during peaks and prevent wrong approvers. When routing is too simple, managers end up chasing approvals outside the system.

How to check

During the demo, set up a scenario with at least two approvers and one policy exception (for example, an alternate approver for a specific team). Confirm whether approvals can re-route, and what happens to audit history when the same request is edited after submission.

Automation and API surface for updates

Why it matters

Automation and API surface decide whether the system can stay current as events happen across tools. If the API is shallow, HR will still re-key absences and edits into multiple places.

How to check

Ask what events trigger outbound updates (create, approve, cancel, modify) and whether there’s a documented sandbox. Then test a sample workflow: can you push an absence request via API and get back the resulting status and identifiers?

Typical range

support for create/modify/cancel plus approval status change notifications

Audit log coverage for changes

Why it matters

Audit log coverage for changes matters when managers, HR, and employees dispute dates or approvals. Without clear history, HR can’t prove what changed, when it changed, and who authorized it.

How to check

Pick an existing absence and perform: edit the dates, change the status, and add a comment. Then open the audit trail view and verify it shows before/after details, actor identity, timestamps, and whether system-generated changes are distinguishable.

RBAC for roles and delegated approvals

Why it matters

RBAC for roles and delegated approvals controls who can create, edit, and approve absences. Tight controls reduce accidental changes and prevent users from seeing cases they shouldn’t.

How to check

Ask the admin to create two roles (for example, manager and HR) and assign a delegated approver for one team. Then test: can each role see and edit only what they should, and do approvals record the original approver vs delegate clearly?

Absence policy configuration flexibility

Why it matters

Absence policy configuration flexibility determines whether the software enforces rules the way your organization actually works. If you can’t model local policies, the system will collect exceptions instead of guiding compliant workflows.

How to check

Request to configure one policy with at least two rule differences (for example, different limits or handling for different absence types). Verify which rules are enforced at request time vs approval time, and ask what happens when a request violates a rule—does it block, warn, or require a special approval path?

Red flags

  • Edits after approval rewrite history without clear before-and-after audit details
  • Approver routing can’t handle alternates or exceptions without manual workarounds
  • API or automation only supports basic records, not full approval status changes

Fit by situation

  • If you frequently adjust absence dates after submission, prioritize absence data model and editable fields.
  • If managers must route requests through different approvers by team and scenario, prioritize approval workflow logic and routing rules.
  • If HR needs other tools to sync absence events reliably, prioritize automation and API surface for updates.
Commissioned Research

Funding and competing interests

This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.

They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.

Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.