GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Communication MediaTop 10 Best E Mail Archiving Software of 2026
Ranking and comparison of e mail archiving software for compliance, secure storage, and retrieval workflows featuring Mimecast, Smarsh, and Pagefreezer.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Mimecast is the strongest fit for regulated teams that rely on governed journaling ingestion and hold-ready eDiscovery retrieval, whereas MailStore works better when you need on-prem or hybrid email archiving with search and export for investigations.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Mimecast
Policy-controlled SMTP journaling that routes message capture for retention and legal hold workflows with governed admin visibility.
Built for fits when regulated teams need governed journaling ingestion, fast retrieval, and hold-ready workflows..
Smarsh
Editor pickLegal hold control combined with retention enforcement ties capture, review, and export into one administrative governance workflow.
Built for fits when compliance teams need consistent journal-based capture with legal hold and retention governance..
Pagefreezer
Editor pickGovernance-first retention and legal hold workflows tied to message capture rules and policy management.
Built for fits when compliance teams need governed journal intake, fast eDiscovery exports, and consistent retention across mail sources..
Comparison Table
Mimecast
enterpriseCloud-based email archiving platform for enterprise compliance and e-discovery.
Policy-controlled SMTP journaling that routes message capture for retention and legal hold workflows with governed admin visibility.
Mimecast is designed for organizations that need centralized journal ingestion and consistent retention policy application across mail flows. The archive supports format handling for messages captured from journaling, including common email containers used in corporate systems. Admin governance includes role-based access and audit-oriented reporting so compliance and IT teams can track holds, policy changes, and access patterns.
A tradeoff is that deep data extraction and long-range migration workflows can require formal export paths and careful planning to match internal chain-of-custody requirements. Mimecast fits best when an IT team wants to manage journaling scope, retention, and search-driven investigation under one administrative surface.
- +SMTP journaling ingest with policy-driven capture scope
- +Search and retrieval designed for compliance investigations
- +Role-based administration with audit-oriented reporting
- +Retention controls that align with legal hold workflows
- –Export and migration workflows need operational planning
- –Granular control over custody metadata is limited outside standard reports
Compliance officer
Run litigation hold investigations fast
Reduced collection cycle time
Email governance team
Centralize retention policy enforcement
Consistent retention coverage
Show 1 more scenario
IT operations
Administer access and audit trails
Lower governance risk
Control who can search, administer, and retrieve archived mail with audit-oriented reporting.
Best for: Fits when regulated teams need governed journaling ingestion, fast retrieval, and hold-ready workflows.
Smarsh
enterpriseCompliance archiving platform for regulated industries covering email and other communications.
Legal hold control combined with retention enforcement ties capture, review, and export into one administrative governance workflow.
Smarsh captures inbound and outbound mail through journal rule connector paths and stores the archive with search and retrieval workflows aimed at compliance teams. Retention policy enforcement and legal hold controls are central to its governance model, with exports and review paths designed for investigation and case handling. The automation surface is strongest around onboarding mail streams and keeping capture consistent across domains and mail flow changes.
A tradeoff appears in the operational overhead required to keep ingestion paths aligned with Exchange and journaling configuration changes. Smarsh fits teams that already run Microsoft Exchange journal-based archiving and need consistent compliance controls without rebuilding ingestion logic. When email sources are diverse beyond SMTP journaling, workload shifts toward connector mapping and process governance.
- +Journal rule connector capture aligns with Exchange journaling workflows
- +Legal hold and retention policy enforcement are built into administration
- +Search and retrieval workflows support compliance review and export
- +Governance controls support audit-oriented access patterns
- –Ingestion path changes can require coordinated admin updates
- –Some non-Exchange mail sources need extra mapping work
- –Role design and permissions setup require active governance discipline
- –Egress and case workflows can feel rigid for ad hoc investigations
Compliance officer
Maintain legal holds across mailboxes
Faster case support
IT and messaging admins
Standardize email capture for Exchange
Lower capture drift
Show 2 more scenarios
EDiscovery and litigation teams
Retrieve archived messages for matters
Reduced time to retrieve
Search and retrieval workflows support efficient export and review for investigations.
Security operations
Support audit-ready email investigations
Improved investigation traceability
Archive access patterns and governance controls support traceable review steps.
Best for: Fits when compliance teams need consistent journal-based capture with legal hold and retention governance.
Pagefreezer
enterpriseCloud archiving platform for email social media and web communications compliance.
Governance-first retention and legal hold workflows tied to message capture rules and policy management.
Pagefreezer is built for journal archiving centered on audit-ready records handling and retrieval workflows. The service processes inbound email through journaling connectors and keeps messages available for search, legal hold workflows, and export requests. Admin controls emphasize retention and governance policies that can be applied consistently across users and mail sources.
A key tradeoff is that governance outcomes depend on correct capture configuration and ongoing policy maintenance, not just on turning on archival storage. Pagefreezer fits best when a compliance team needs repeatable intake, controlled retention, and predictable exports for litigation support from a managed archive rather than manual mailbox reads.
- +Policy-driven retention and hold workflows designed for compliance teams
- +Search and export workflows built for legal reviews and regulator requests
- +Journaling-focused ingestion supports consistent capture from mail systems
- +Administration features support repeatable management across mail sources
- –Requires careful setup of capture rules and continuing policy governance
- –Advanced customization depends on technical integration work
- –Large-scale export workflows can bottleneck on review-side access patterns
- –Some mailbox-specific nuances require operational knowledge of source systems
Compliance operations teams
Manage retention and litigation holds
Fewer hold-related manual steps
Legal discovery teams
Export messages for eDiscovery review
Faster collection and production
Show 2 more scenarios
Security and compliance officers
Centralize email retention evidence
More consistent audit responses
Maintain a controlled archive state for regulator inquiries and internal review trails.
IT messaging administrators
Standardize journaling intake
More predictable archival coverage
Connect mail sources using journaling-style ingestion and keep capture settings aligned with policies.
Best for: Fits when compliance teams need governed journal intake, fast eDiscovery exports, and consistent retention across mail sources.
Barracuda
enterpriseEmail archiving solution integrated with Barracuda security and backup products.
Archive administration is integrated with Barracuda’s email security control plane for connector management and archive operations visibility.
Barracuda offers email archiving through its Barracuda Email Security and archive ecosystem, with emphasis on ingesting and retaining messages for compliance access. The product supports large mailbox ingestion workflows and searchable retrieval of archived content for investigations and policy enforcement.
Administration focuses on connector-driven collection paths, retention-oriented governance, and audit trail visibility across archive operations. Barracuda’s differentiator is how archiving integrates with its broader email security control plane to centralize deployment and operational oversight.
- +Connector-based ingestion for consistent mailbox archive population
- +Centralized administration aligned with Barracuda email security operations
- +Search and retrieval designed for investigator-style message lookups
- +Retention governance aligned to compliance workflows
- –Complex connector planning can slow initial onboarding for hybrid setups
- –Full-text indexing and search depth depend on configuration choices
- –Large-scale migration projects require careful operational sequencing
- –Granular RBAC for archive access can be limited versus dedicated archiving suites
Best for: Fits when compliance teams want Barracuda-aligned email retention and retrieval with centralized operational control.
Proofpoint
enterpriseEnterprise email archiving with compliance and e-discovery capabilities.
End-to-end governance around retention and hold enforcement with audit visibility across ingestion, search, and export activities.
Proofpoint provides email archiving and compliance retention with administrative controls for journaling ingestion and long-term storage workflows. The product supports WORM-aligned storage options, structured retention policies, and search or export for eDiscovery and disclosure requests.
Proofpoint also focuses on governance through audit visibility, hold handling for legal and litigation scenarios, and integration points that fit existing Microsoft and mail routing environments. Operations teams get configuration for ingestion paths and lifecycle actions tied to retention and disposition workflows.
- +Strong compliance workflow coverage for retention, holds, and export activities
- +Audit-oriented administration supports oversight during investigations and disclosures
- +Integration supports common journaling and mail ingestion paths for enterprise environments
- +Search and export workflows cover litigation and compliance retrieval needs
- –Operational setup requires careful ingestion configuration and routing validation
- –Deep reporting and workflow tuning can take time for complex estates
- –Mailbox mapping and policy scoping can become intricate with many domains
- –Some extraction formats and metadata outputs can require additional workflow steps
Best for: Fits when compliance teams need governed retention and export workflows tied to journaling ingestion.
MailStore
SMBOn-premises and cloud email archiving software for small and mid-sized businesses.
Live ingestion plus archive stubbing that keeps mailbox clients usable while retaining messages in the archive.
MailStore is an email archiving system that focuses on ingesting live mail and turning it into a searchable archive for compliance workflows. It supports mailbox ingestion from multiple sources and provides full-text search over archived items plus item-level access and export for investigations.
Administration centers on connection, retention, and indexing configuration, with audit-style logging for archive operations. Retrieval is designed around message-level viewing and exports in common email formats.
- +Message-level search over archived content with quick retrieval workflows
- +Multiple ingestion methods for moving mail into a central archive
- +Configurable indexing to control what is searchable and fast to find
- +Export supports common email formats for case and investigation workflows
- –Advanced compliance workflows require careful configuration of retention policies
- –Large archives can need tuning of indexing throughput for consistent search speed
- –Role controls are functional but less granular than enterprise eDiscovery suites
- –Stubbing and write-back style workflows add complexity to governance processes
Best for: Fits when an on-prem or hybrid team needs governed email archiving, search, and export for investigations.
GFI Archiver
SMBEmail archiving software for Exchange and Office 365 environments.
Archive capture via Exchange journal rule connector with retention behavior designed for WORM-style compliance storage
GFI Archiver targets regulated email retention by combining ingestion paths with retention and retrieval workflows that map to legal and compliance operations.
The product supports connector-driven capture for journaling scenarios and focuses on searchable archives plus export outputs used in investigations and litigation support.
Governance relies on configured retention behavior and archive access controls backed by audit-oriented logging for administrative reviews.
- +Journal rule connector ingestion supports Exchange journaling workflows
- +WORM-oriented retention mode fits SEC Rule 17a-4 style controls
- +Search and export workflows support eDiscovery export use cases
- +Retention and disposition controls cover multi-year retention policies
- –Onboarding and connector configuration require careful infrastructure planning
- –Full automation for complex legal hold chains is limited versus some peers
- –Admin configuration surfaces are dense for smaller governance teams
- –Scalability tuning depends on throughput sizing for ingestion and indexing
Best for: Fits when compliance teams need controlled email capture, retention behavior, and export-ready retrieval for litigation workflows.
Jatheon
enterpriseEmail and communications archiving platform for compliance and e-discovery.
Search and export are designed around how compliance teams work with archived journal content, not only mailbox browsing.
Jatheon is an email archiving tool focused on compliance storage and retrieval for journaled messaging flows. It supports ingestion of email artifacts for long-term retention and provides search that targets message content and metadata for eDiscovery-style workflows.
Administration emphasizes retention controls, legal hold handling, and export-oriented access patterns used by compliance teams. Integration options center on connecting upstream journaling and ingestion sources rather than replacing mail servers.
- +Strong retrieval workflow for compliance staff doing document-style searches
- +Retention and disposition controls align with audit-driven archiving processes
- +Export-first access pattern supports downstream review tooling
- +Format handling covers common email storage and transport artifacts
- –Workflow automation relies more on configuration than on scripted APIs
- –Advanced governance and role separation are less granular than leading peers
- –Full-text coverage and indexing tuning can require ongoing attention
- –Large-scale migrations may need staged cutovers to avoid ingestion backlogs
Best for: Fits when compliance teams need searchable journaled email archives and repeatable export workflows.
Cryoserver
enterpriseEmail archiving solution offering forensic-level compliance and e-discovery storage.
On-prem mailbox archiving with built-in retrieval search optimized for archived message access.
Cryoserver provides an on-premises email archiving system for storing and retrieving archived messages by account and date. It supports automated ingestion of emails into an archive and provides search for message retrieval in common formats like EML and MSG.
Administration centers on retention and access controls so compliance teams can enforce consistent retention across mailboxes. Retrieval uses indexed content to reduce time spent locating specific communications during compliance reviews or legal requests.
- +On-premises deployment supports internal governance and data residency needs
- +Automated mailbox ingestion reduces manual export and indexing gaps
- +Indexed message retrieval speeds up searches across large archives
- +Clear retention configuration supports consistent lifecycle management
- –Advanced migration scenarios may require careful planning and staged rollout
- –Integration depth for nonstandard mail paths depends on connector availability
- –Search scope control can feel limited compared with tools that expose granular query controls
- –Role delegation workflows need more operator discipline for audit-grade separation
Best for: Fits when organizations need on-prem email archiving with indexed retrieval and governed retention.
Quest Archive Manager
enterpriseEmail archiving software for Exchange and Office 365 with e-discovery support.
Index-backed full-text retrieval across archived journals and mailboxes with export-ready message format support.
Quest Archive Manager targets organizations that need long-term email retention with controlled storage and audit-oriented access patterns. It focuses on journaling ingestion and mailbox archiving workflows tied to administrative retention policies and search-driven retrieval.
The product supports common email message formats like EML and MSG for ingestion and export, and it includes indexing for full-text search over archived content. Governance is handled through archive administration controls for custodians, retention settings, and access to exported evidence sets.
- +Journal ingestion supports SMTP journaling patterns for centralized retention
- +Full-text search targets archived content to reduce manual eDiscovery steps
- +EML and MSG handling supports practical migrations and exports
- +Archive administration centralizes retention configuration and retrieval access
- –Advanced governance controls require careful configuration of retention and access
- –API and automation surface is limited compared with top-tier compliance vendors
- –Hybrid deployment scenarios can increase operational overhead
- –Large-scale search and export throughput depends on index and storage sizing
Best for: Fits when legal holds and retention run mainly through journaling plus indexed search, with structured admin control needs.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 communication media, Mimecast stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right e mail archiving software
Email archiving software vendors compete on how they capture journaled messages, enforce retention and legal hold rules, and let compliance teams retrieve and export evidence under chain-of-custody expectations. This buyer’s guide covers Mimecast, Smarsh, and Pagefreezer alongside the other eight tools in the Top 10 list to compare workflow control, integration depth, and governance visibility.
The comparison focuses on practical mechanics like policy-controlled SMTP journaling routing, journal rule connector behavior with Exchange journaling patterns, and export workflows designed for regulator requests and litigation response. Each tool card reflects how automation and administrative controls affect capture scope, search throughput, and hold-ready retrieval.
Email archiving software for compliance capture, retention enforcement, and retrieval exports
Email archiving software centralizes email capture from mailbox and journaling paths, stores content for long-term retention, and supports search and export for legal hold, investigations, and disclosures. Many deployments use stubbing or indexed archive access so users can retrieve messages without maintaining full mailbox history in primary mailboxes.
Mimecast emphasizes policy-controlled SMTP journaling that routes message capture for retention and legal hold workflows with governed admin visibility. Smarsh ties legal hold control to retention enforcement in its administration and aligns its journal rule connector capture with Exchange journaling workflows. Pagefreezer prioritizes governance-first retention and legal hold workflows that map to message capture rules and policy management while keeping export workflows oriented to eDiscovery and regulator requests.
Core evaluation criteria for e mail archiving software governance and retrieval
The most differentiating capabilities in e mail archiving software are how ingestion is governed and how exports and holds stay consistent across investigations. This guide prioritizes capture routing behavior, hold enforcement linkage, and the operational controls used by compliance administrators.
Retrieval also determines whether archived evidence stays usable under time pressure. Tools with clear admin visibility for what was captured, what was held, and what was exported reduce chain-of-custody gaps during legal hold, regulator requests, and eDiscovery workflows.
Policy-controlled journaling ingestion and hold-ready capture scope
Mimecast routes message capture for retention and legal hold workflows through policy-controlled SMTP journaling with governed admin visibility. Smarsh ties journal rule connector capture to administrative legal hold and retention governance so captured content aligns with enforcement.
Retention and legal hold workflow integration in one governance surface
Smarsh combines legal hold control with retention enforcement inside administration so compliance staff manage capture, hold, and export under one operational workflow. Pagefreezer builds governance-first retention and legal hold workflows tied to message capture rules and policy management.
Export and migration operational readiness for litigation and regulator workflows
Proofpoint provides end-to-end governance around retention, holds, and export activities with audit visibility across ingestion, search, and export actions. Mimecast supports compliance investigation retrieval and search designed for compliance investigations, but export and migration workflows need operational planning.
Indexing and retrieval performance tuning across large archives
MailStore provides message-level search with quick retrieval workflows and supports multiple ingestion methods for central archive population. Barracuda’s search depth and full-text behavior depend on configuration choices, so initial connector planning and indexing tuning affect day-to-day retrieval throughput.
Deployment shape for governance, data residency, and operational control
Cryoserver focuses on on-prem mailbox archiving with built-in retrieval search optimized for archived message access and governed retention. Barracuda integrates archive administration into its email security control plane to centralize connector management and archive operations visibility.
Choose based on capture governance model, automation surface, and retrieval workflow fit
The decision starts with the product’s capture governance model because eDiscovery hold and retention correctness depend on what journaling rules ingest and how admin controls document scope. The next cut should map retrieval and export workflows to how compliance teams run investigations and regulator requests.
Two architectures in this category lead to different implementation paths. One emphasizes policy-controlled SMTP journaling routing and governed visibility for capture, search, and hold readiness. Another emphasizes admin governance that combines legal hold and retention enforcement with journal rule connector workflows aligned to Exchange journaling patterns.
Map the ingestion path to how journal capture scope is governed
If message capture scope must be routed by policies for retention and legal hold workflows, Mimecast provides policy-controlled SMTP journaling with governed admin visibility. If capture scope must align with Exchange journaling workflows via a journal rule connector, Smarsh’s journal rule connector capture aligns with Exchange journaling patterns.
Pick the governance philosophy that matches legal hold operations
If legal hold administration must be tied directly to retention enforcement in the same administrative governance workflow, Smarsh combines legal hold control with retention policy enforcement. If the organization needs governance-first retention and legal hold workflows tied to message capture rules and policy management, Pagefreezer is designed for compliance teams managing hold-ready evidence and exports.
Assess export and migration readiness for the investigations lifecycle
When export must be governed end-to-end across ingestion, search, and export actions with audit visibility, Proofpoint includes audit-oriented administration covering retention, holds, and export activities. If the plan includes migration and operational changes to how archives are built, Mimecast needs operational planning for export and migration workflows.
Validate retrieval performance for large archives and tune search depth decisions
If retrieval must stay fast at message level for investigation workflows, MailStore supports message-level search over archived content with quick retrieval workflows and multiple ingestion methods. If retrieval depth and search behavior are configuration-dependent, Barracuda’s full-text indexing and search depth depend on configuration choices, which makes connector and indexing decisions part of the evaluation.
Confirm administrative control depth for archive operations visibility
If archive operations visibility needs to live inside an existing email security administration plane, Barracuda integrates archive administration with its email security control plane. If the archive strategy must run on-prem for internal governance and data residency, Cryoserver provides on-premises deployment with automated mailbox ingestion.
Who should use which e mail archiving software approach
The right e mail archiving software depends on how compliance teams run hold and retention enforcement against journaling capture. These tools differ in how much governance is embedded in administration, how ingestion routing is controlled, and how export workflows fit legal reviews.
The best-fit segments below focus on whether capture is policy-routed, whether legal hold and retention enforcement are coupled in admin, and whether search and export workflows are designed for compliance investigations and regulator requests.
Regulated teams that need policy-controlled SMTP journaling capture with governed admin visibility
Mimecast fits because policy-controlled SMTP journaling routes message capture for retention and legal hold workflows with governed admin visibility designed for compliance investigations.
Compliance teams standardizing journal-based capture with Exchange journaling patterns
Smarsh fits because its journal rule connector capture aligns with Exchange journaling workflows while legal hold and retention policy enforcement are built into administration.
Compliance and legal operations teams running governance-first hold and retention management with fast eDiscovery exports
Pagefreezer fits because it ties governance-first retention and legal hold workflows to message capture rules and keeps export workflows oriented for legal reviews and regulator requests.
Organizations needing on-prem archive deployment for internal governance and data residency
Cryoserver fits because it provides on-prem mailbox archiving with built-in retrieval search optimized for archived message access and automated mailbox ingestion.
Teams that want archive stubbing to keep mailbox clients usable while retaining messages in the archive
MailStore fits because live ingestion plus archive stubbing keeps mailbox clients usable while messages remain retained in the archive for search and export.
Common e mail archiving software pitfalls that break legal hold and retrieval workflows
Most failures come from misaligning capture rules with hold enforcement and from underestimating how indexing and exports depend on configuration. Another common error is selecting based on mailbox browsing convenience rather than on governed capture scope and audit-ready exports.
The pitfalls below focus on specific workflow risks visible in how these vendors position journaling capture, governance administration, and retrieval and export behavior for compliance and litigation response.
Assuming journaling ingestion configuration will not affect hold correctness
Mimecast’s export and migration workflows need operational planning, which makes capture rule changes a governance risk if export behavior is not planned alongside ingestion scope.
Treating ingestion path changes as an admin detail instead of a governance change
Smarsh ingestion path changes can require coordinated admin updates, so journal rule connector changes should be tested against hold and retention enforcement outcomes before rollout.
Overlooking how search depth and full-text behavior depend on configuration
Barracuda’s full-text indexing and search depth depend on configuration choices, so search tuning decisions should be validated against expected retrieval workloads during evaluation.
Underestimating the governance workload of capture rules and ongoing policy management
Pagefreezer requires careful setup of capture rules and continuing policy governance, so the organization should plan governance ownership before committing to retention and hold workflows.
Selecting on-prem or hybrid deployment without validating migration and rollout staging
Cryoserver’s advanced migration scenarios may require careful planning and staged rollout, so migration sequencing must be tested for archived retrieval behavior.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Mimecast, Smarsh, Pagefreezer, and the other seven tools by comparing ingestion governance mechanics, retention and legal hold workflow coupling, and retrieval and export workflow fit. Features carried 40% of the weight and ease of administration and operational onboarding carried 30% of the weight, while value carried 30% based on how governance and retrieval capabilities reduce investigation friction.
Mimecast separated itself through policy-controlled SMTP journaling that routes message capture for retention and legal hold workflows with governed admin visibility and compliance-investigation retrieval and search. Smarsh ranked highly for legal hold control combined with retention enforcement inside administration and for journal rule connector capture aligned with Exchange journaling workflows.
Frequently Asked Questions About e mail archiving software
How do Mimecast, Smarsh, and Pagefreezer handle journal-rule ingestion for compliance capture?
Which platform provides the strongest legal hold control tied to retention enforcement for audit workflows?
What breaks if an email archiving deployment lacks full-text indexing for retrieval?
When should an organization pick WORM-aligned storage behavior instead of standard retention storage?
How do admin controls differ across Mimecast, Barracuda, and Proofpoint for audit log coverage?
Which tool fits when mailbox clients must remain usable while messages move into archive storage?
What integration and API needs typically drive selection between Exchange journaling workflows and connector-driven ingestion?
Where does Pagefreezer fall short compared with tools that center archive operation visibility in centralized security control planes?
When an eDiscovery request requires extracting evidence in common message formats, how do the tools compare?
How should data migration and validation be handled when moving from PST-based storage into a governed archive?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
- Communication MediaTop 10 Best Mail Management Software of 2026
- Technology Digital MediaTop 10 Best File Archiving Software of 2026
- Communication MediaTop 10 Best Most Popular Email Software of 2026
- Business FinanceTop 10 Best Mail Archive Software of 2026
- Communication MediaTop 10 Best Email Content Filtering Software of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Communication Media alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of communication media tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare communication media tools→