
GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Data Science AnalyticsTop 10 Best Document Annotation Software of 2026
Top 10 document annotation software ranked by features and pricing, with a side-by-side comparison for teams, including Kami and UPDF.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Apryse WebViewer is the best fit if your teams need an embedded, revision-aware PDF viewing and annotation workflow with exportable regions, whereas Kami is a stronger choice when you want quick region-anchored PDF markup and collaborative comments for classroom-style reviews.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Apryse WebViewer
Document version comparison that supports side-by-side style change review tied to a shared annotation workflow.
Built for fits when teams need a browser PDF review UI embedded into an application with revision-aware workflows and exportable regions..
Kami
Editor pickRegion-anchored threaded comments in a shared viewer with OCR-enhanced selections for scanned PDFs.
Built for fits when teams need fast PDF review with region-anchored comments and OCR-enabled markup..
UPDF
Editor pickIn-document comment and drawing tools that keep markup precisely aligned to PDF page rendering.
Built for fits when teams need fast PDF page markup and review comments without heavy labeling governance..
Comparison Table
Apryse WebViewer
API-firstEmbedded document viewer SDK with annotation support for PDFs, Office files, images, and more.
Document version comparison that supports side-by-side style change review tied to a shared annotation workflow.
Apryse WebViewer provides an in-browser annotation layer for multi-page PDFs, including comment threads, sticky notes, and drawing markups that stay anchored to the underlying page view. It supports revision comparison and change review patterns that make it practical to review updated documents with a persistent annotation history. For automation, it exposes integration points for embedding the viewer in custom applications and driving annotation operations from external code. For teams building annotation programs, this integration depth matters more than pure UI coverage because workflow logic needs to live outside the viewer.
A key tradeoff is that annotation structure and dataset-ready exports depend on how the integration maps markup types to the target schema, which adds configuration work for each labeling program. Apryse WebViewer fits best when a team needs a browser-based review interface inside an internal application with controlled roles, and when exported regions must align with an external labeling or evaluation system.
- +Browser-based annotation layer keeps marks anchored to PDF pages
- +Revision comparison supports reviewer workflows across updated documents
- +API embedding enables workflow integration into existing portals
- +Annotation export supports coordinate-based outputs for downstream pipelines
- –Dataset-ready output requires careful mapping from markup types to schema
- –Advanced governance and audit controls require integration work in the host app
Legal ops teams
Review redlines across document versions
Faster adjudication of change requests
Computer vision labeling teams
Export labeled regions from PDFs
Cleaner handoff to training pipelines
Show 1 more scenario
Enterprise portal engineering
Embed annotation workflow in web apps
Consistent workflows across teams
An API-driven embedding model supports custom task queues and reviewer interfaces around the viewer.
Best for: Fits when teams need a browser PDF review UI embedded into an application with revision-aware workflows and exportable regions.
Kami
vertical specialistDocument annotation platform for PDFs, worksheets, and classroom materials with collaborative comments and markup.
Region-anchored threaded comments in a shared viewer with OCR-enhanced selections for scanned PDFs.
Kami provides page-level navigation for multi-page PDFs and lets reviewers add markup such as highlights, drawings, and callout-style notes anchored to specific regions. Commenting works as threaded feedback tied to selections, and reviewers can respond without leaving the document view. The OCR layer supports working with scanned content by converting it to selectable text so highlights and selections target recognized characters.
The main tradeoff is that Kami targets document review workflows instead of structured label exports used for training tasks like bounding boxes or polygon segmentation datasets. Kami can fit teams that need faster adjudication of document feedback and evidence capture in one place, especially when reviewers work from browsers and mobile devices.
The best usage situation is a cross-functional review where stakeholders need to annotate the same PDF, attach justification in comments, and produce an annotated output for downstream sign-off or archiving.
- +Threaded comments attach to exact selected regions
- +OCR makes scanned text highlightable and selectable
- +Multi-format markup covers PDFs, images, and web documents
- +Mobile-first markup supports on-the-go review
- –Dataset-style exports for ML labeling need separate workflows
- –Advanced governance and audit controls are not the primary focus
Legal and compliance reviewers
Markup scanned policies with review comments
Faster adjudication of clause edits
QA and engineering teams
Review annotated design and spec PDFs
Clear change history in exports
Show 2 more scenarios
Education and training staff
Provide feedback on student submissions
More actionable student feedback
Instructors mark PDFs and respond inside the document instead of using separate feedback documents.
Procurement and contracts teams
Track contract revisions across stakeholders
Reduced back-and-forth on edits
Stakeholders annotate shared documents and thread responses to specific marked passages.
Best for: Fits when teams need fast PDF review with region-anchored comments and OCR-enabled markup.
UPDF
SMBPDF editor with annotation, highlighting, note-taking, and review tools on desktop and mobile.
In-document comment and drawing tools that keep markup precisely aligned to PDF page rendering.
UPDF’s core workflow keeps annotations attached to PDF pages through tools like highlights, sticky note style comments, and freehand or shape drawing. It supports reading and reviewing changes with page navigation and a revision-friendly viewing experience that reduces context switching during labeling sessions. UPDF’s strength is the tight coupling between markup and document rendering, which helps when ground truth depends on page layout rather than extracted text alone.
A tradeoff appears for teams that need strict annotation schema enforcement across labeling types, because UPDF’s controls are optimized for PDF markup rather than label-ontology governance. The tool fits best when reviewers must correct figures, callouts, and document elements during human-in-the-loop review, especially when many comments must land on specific pages quickly.
- +Annotation tools stay tightly coupled to rendered PDF pages
- +Comment-style feedback works well for page-specific review cycles
- +Drawing and markup tools cover common review interactions
- +Quick navigation supports review across long, multi-page files
- –Schema enforcement for multi-task labeling is limited compared to labeling-first tools
- –Collaboration and governance features are less built around team provisioning
QA and compliance reviewers
Markups on policy and form PDFs
Faster issue turnaround per document
Document production teams
Figure and layout correction loops
Reduced rework from clearer feedback
Show 1 more scenario
Human-in-the-loop labeling staff
Manual review of page-level signals
More accurate ground-truth capture
Annotators capture evidence on rendered pages when extracted text alone is insufficient.
Best for: Fits when teams need fast PDF page markup and review comments without heavy labeling governance.
Adobe Acrobat
enterprisePDF software with commenting, markup, review, and annotation tools across desktop, web, and mobile.
Threaded comment reviews tied to exact PDF locations reduce back-and-forth during multi-round document sign-off.
Adobe Acrobat is a document annotation tool built around PDF markup for comments, highlights, stamps, and drawings. Its core workflow centers on review and annotation across multi-page PDFs with comment threading and exportable review artifacts.
Acrobat also supports redaction and form-filling on the same document canvas, which reduces context switching during review-heavy processes. For data-centric annotation workflows like pixel or polygon labeling, Acrobat is limited because it does not provide a dataset export model such as COCO for region-level ground truth.
- +Comment threading supports structured reviewer feedback on specific PDF locations
- +Redaction and markup tools share the same PDF editing surface
- +Annotation export packages review information for downstream handling
- +Form field editing supports common review artifacts like dates and sign-off marks
- –Bounding-box and polygon-style labeling exports for ML datasets are not native
- –High-volume batch labeling needs extra workflow tooling outside Acrobat
- –Annotation locking and role-based review controls are limited compared with review platforms
- –Automated annotation QA rules and validation constraints require external processes
Best for: Fits when review teams need PDF-first markup, redaction, and threaded comments on shared documents.
Nitro PDF Pro
enterprisePDF software for markup, comments, approvals, and document review in business workflows.
Side-by-side revision comparison aligns markup with version differences inside the PDF review flow.
Nitro PDF Pro turns PDF markup into an end-to-end review workflow with drawing and highlight annotations plus comment-based review inside the document. It supports measurement markup and redaction tools for marking content for concealment, and it can export annotated outputs as documents for downstream consumption.
Nitro PDF Pro also includes side-by-side review and revision-style comparisons that help teams review changes across document versions. For teams that annotate scans or document images, Nitro PDF Pro can add annotations aligned to the PDF page view and work alongside its text extraction pipeline for practical review flows.
- +Side-by-side revision comparisons support faster review of document changes
- +Redaction tools handle content concealment without removing markup context
- +Measurement markup makes markups usable for review and review-by-accuracy checks
- +Drawing and comment annotations support both visual feedback and threaded notes
- –Annotation export options can be limiting for dataset-style training label formats
- –Collaborative review depends more on document sharing than real-time co-editing
- –Annotation organization and filtering are less granular than dedicated labeling workbenches
- –Automation requires more manual steps than API-first annotation systems
Best for: Fits when teams need review-ready PDF markup, redaction, and revision comparisons in a desktop workflow.
Xodo PDF Studio
SMBPDF editor and viewer with annotation, markup, form, and review tools for individuals and teams.
OCR-backed text selection combined with threaded region comments for markups on scanned or low-text PDFs.
Xodo PDF Studio supports PDF annotation workflows with markup tools like highlights, drawing markup, shapes, and sticky notes that are meant for review in document threads. It also includes form field tools and an OCR layer option for making scanned text selectable before annotating.
Collaboration and review are enabled through Xodo’s hosted review links and comment sharing rather than only local markup files. Compared with annotation-first dataset tooling, Xodo focuses more on reviewer markup, revision inspection, and shareable review sessions than on exporting complex label schemas for ML training.
- +Annotation toolbar covers common PDF review marks like highlights, drawings, and callouts
- +OCR makes scanned pages searchable so highlights and comments can anchor to text
- +Comment threads support reviewer dialogue tied to exact document regions
- +Shareable review links simplify review distribution without manual file rework
- –Annotation exports are oriented to document review rather than dataset formats like COCO or Pascal VOC
- –Bulk label workflows for bounding boxes and polygons feel limited compared with dataset platforms
- –Role-based review controls and audit log depth are not designed for strict governance at scale
- –Offline annotation and conflict-safe syncing are less specialized than dedicated collaborative labeling tools
Best for: Fits when review teams need fast PDF markup, threaded comments, and OCR-driven annotation on business documents.
PDF Expert
SMBMac, iPhone, and iPad PDF app with highlighting, notes, markup, and document commenting.
Layer-aware annotation controls that keep multiple review markups readable and toggleable per-page during revision cycles.
PDF Expert pairs a desktop-first PDF viewer with strong in-document annotation controls for highlights, drawing markups, and text notes. It emphasizes markup clarity on the page and quick workflows for reviewing revisions, including comment-style feedback and layered annotation visibility.
Text extraction and search support help reviewers jump to relevant content before applying further markup. Annotation export is oriented toward sharing marked-up documents rather than dataset-style label exports.
- +Touch-like annotation controls on desktop with responsive page navigation
- +Comment-style notes and highlights stay readable at typical zoom levels
- +Search and text extraction help locate passages before marking them up
- +Layered visibility controls make review states easier to manage
- –Dataset-style labeling formats like COCO exports are not its focus
- –Automation and API access for annotation queues are limited
- –Large multi-reviewer workflows are harder than in web-first tools
- –Cross-document version comparison support is basic compared with review suites
Best for: Fits when teams need fast desktop markup, comment-style feedback, and review-ready exports in a standard PDF workflow.
Drawboard PDF
vertical specialistPDF markup and annotation software built for pen, touch, and technical drawing workflows.
Touch-first ink and drawing markup with engineering measurement tools inside the PDF viewer.
Drawboard PDF enables annotation directly on PDF pages with pen, highlight, and comment-style markup, plus structured measure tools for visual reviews. Page-level navigation and a compact viewer make multi-page markup practical, while layers of annotations stay anchored to the underlying document view.
Exports and sharing support review loops focused on captured feedback rather than dataset labeling pipelines. Collaboration features center on review comments and viewing, not on concurrent bounding box or polygon labeling workflows.
- +Ink and markup tools work directly on PDF rendering for fast redlines
- +Annotation placement stays tied to pages during review and re-open
- +Measure and drawing annotations support engineering-style feedback
- +Comment-style workflows fit review cycles that need context
- –Annotation export and label mapping for COCO or Pascal VOC are limited
- –Workflow automation and batch annotation controls are not built for large labeling throughput
- –RBAC, audit log, and admin governance controls are less detailed than dataset tools
- –Advanced segmentation annotation for pixel-precise workflows is comparatively constrained
Best for: Fits when teams need touch-friendly PDF markup and review comments, not dataset-grade labeling exports.
Hypothes.is
educationWeb and document annotation software for shared highlighting, notes, and discussion layers.
Anchored text-range annotations plus threaded comments that remain tied to the original selection.
Hypothes.is renders an annotation layer on top of web pages so readers can highlight, select spans, and attach comments to exact text ranges. It supports reply-threaded discussions and annotation export so reviews can move from conversation to dataset or workflow.
The service also enables authenticated teams to manage who can create, view, and moderate annotations on shared documents. Webhooks and a REST API support automation around annotation creation, retrieval, and synchronization with external systems.
- +Text-range annotations stay anchored to selected spans on dynamic pages
- +Threaded replies keep review context attached to specific highlights
- +REST API enables programmatic creation and retrieval of annotations
- +Annotation export supports downstream analysis and dataset building
- –Governance controls are weaker for large multi-workspace deployments
- –Deep PDF markup workflows depend on document handling outside the web layer
Best for: Fits when teams need web-based collaborative review with API-driven annotation workflows and discussion threads.
DocHub
SMBPDF annotation and document signing software with browser-based editing tools.
Comment threading anchored to PDF locations for contract-style review workflows.
DocHub is a browser-based document annotation tool centered on PDF markup, comment threads, and export of annotated documents. It supports drawing markup, text highlights, sticky-note style comments, and form-like field annotations inside PDF viewers.
DocHub also includes collaborative review workflows with permissions and revision history, which suits teams that need reviewer feedback on contracts and documents. The tool further supports annotation export that preserves markup and comment content for downstream consumption.
- +Browser-first PDF markup with highlights, drawings, and threaded comments
- +Clear comment threading supports multi-reviewer feedback on specific locations
- +Annotation export carries markup and comment context for share and archive
- +Permissioned collaboration supports controlled reviewer participation
- –Annotation workflows are weaker for pixel-level segmentation labeling tasks
- –Limited dataset-grade export formats for training pipelines compared with labeling suites
- –High-volume labeling throughput depends on manual queue management
- –Automation and API extensibility are not geared toward large annotation programs
Best for: Fits when teams need reviewer-friendly PDF markup, threaded feedback, and document handoffs.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 data science analytics, Apryse WebViewer stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right document annotation software
Document annotation software covers tools that let teams attach marks, highlights, and threaded comments to specific PDF regions and later export or share the annotated output for review, approval, or labeling workflows. This guide covers Apryse WebViewer, SuperAnnotate, Scale AI, and other top options including Kami, UPDF, Adobe Acrobat, Nitro PDF Pro, Xodo PDF Studio, PDF Expert, Drawboard PDF, Hypothes.is, and DocHub.
The practical differences show up in how annotation anchors to the PDF rendering layer, how revision comparison is handled, and whether exports map cleanly to dataset-style formats like COCO or Pascal VOC. Apryse WebViewer is included for browser-based revision-aware workflows, while Kami and Adobe Acrobat are included for region-anchored commenting and PDF-first review use cases.
Document annotation software for PDF region markup, threaded review, and exportable annotation outputs
Document annotation software lets users create page-anchored markup like drawing overlays, region highlights, and threaded comments, then use the annotations in downstream review or labeling workflows. Several tools also add OCR-driven selection so scanned documents can be highlighted with region-anchored feedback.
The strongest workflow fit depends on revision-aware review versus labeling-first dataset export. Apryse WebViewer emphasizes document version comparison in a browser viewer with a shared annotation workflow, while Kami emphasizes OCR-enhanced selections combined with region-anchored threaded comments for fast PDF review.
Category-specific feature checklist for document annotation software
Document annotation software earns its value when annotations stay anchored to the PDF rendering layer and remain usable after page navigation, zoom changes, and re-opening. The practical next requirement is workflow-level output, including whether annotations can export in a dataset-oriented shape or remain review-first.
Revision-aware review and side-by-side change comparison
Apryse WebViewer ties a shared annotation workflow to document version comparison with side-by-side review. Nitro PDF Pro also supports side-by-side revision comparison inside the review flow.
Region-anchored threaded comments tied to selections
Kami attaches threaded comments to exact selected regions and adds OCR-enabled selection for scanned PDFs. Adobe Acrobat and DocHub also provide threaded comment reviews tied to precise PDF locations.
OCR-backed selection and highlightability for scanned documents
Kami uses OCR to make scanned text highlightable and selectable so comments can anchor to the selected region. Xodo PDF Studio provides OCR-backed text selection combined with threaded region comments for scanned or low-text pages.
Dataset export readiness for labeling pipelines
Apryse WebViewer is dataset-ready in output, but it requires careful mapping from markup types to the target schema. Adobe Acrobat, Xodo PDF Studio, and Drawboard PDF are document review-first, with limited native support for bounding-box and polygon labeling export formats.
Layer-aware and toggleable markup for revision cycles
PDF Expert keeps multiple review markups readable using layer-aware annotation controls and per-page toggle visibility. Hypothes.is focuses on anchored text-range annotations and threaded replies tied to original selections rather than layered PDF markups.
Touch-first ink and measurement tools for redlining
Drawboard PDF supports touch-first ink and drawing markup with engineering measurement tools inside the viewer. UPDF also keeps in-document comment and drawing tools precisely aligned to PDF page rendering for page-specific review cycles.
Choose by workflow shape: browser revision review versus labeling export versus reviewer markup
The right selection hinges on where the work starts and what the output must feed next. Browser-based revision comparison favors tools that keep annotations attached across updated document versions, while labeling-first needs tools that map markup to dataset-style label formats.
A second axis is whether teams need region-anchored threaded feedback for PDF review or anchored text-range collaboration on dynamic web pages. OCR-backed selection is the deciding factor when scanned PDFs are common in the source document repository.
Pick revision-aware side-by-side workflows if updates drive review cycles
If the core task is reviewing changes between document versions with annotations tied to the shared workflow, Apryse WebViewer fits because it supports document version comparison with side-by-side change review. Nitro PDF Pro also supports side-by-side revision comparisons, but collaborative review is more dependent on document sharing than real-time co-editing.
Pick PDF-region threaded commenting if feedback must anchor to exact locations
For reviewer feedback that must attach to exact selected regions, choose Kami or Adobe Acrobat because both support threaded comments tied to precise PDF locations. DocHub is also tuned for browser-first contract-style review with highlights, drawings, and threaded comments anchored to PDF locations.
Pick OCR-backed selection tools when scanned PDFs dominate throughput
For scanned documents where users need to highlight text and anchor comments, choose Kami because OCR makes scanned text highlightable and selectable. If the team needs fast PDF markup with OCR-driven selection and threaded region comments, Xodo PDF Studio covers that workflow in its PDF viewer.
Pick dataset export mapping when outputs must feed labeling formats
When downstream training pipelines require bounding-box or polygon style labeling outputs, Apryse WebViewer is the labeling-first browser option because it is dataset-ready with schema mapping requirements. If the main goal is review and redaction rather than dataset-ready label formats, Adobe Acrobat, Xodo PDF Studio, and Drawboard PDF fit better than labeling-first suites.
Pick touch-first ink and measurement tools when physical-style redlines are the workflow
If markup is driven by touch ink, measurement, and rapid redlining inside the PDF viewer, Drawboard PDF matches that workflow because it includes ink and engineering measurement tools. UPDF also keeps comments and drawing aligned to rendered PDF pages for page-specific markup cycles without heavy labeling governance.
Who document annotation software is for
Document annotation software fits teams that need repeatable PDF-region feedback and later export for review or labeling workflows. The best-fit tool depends on whether teams prioritize revision comparison, OCR-enabled commenting, or dataset-style output mapping. The category also serves web-first collaboration use cases where annotations stay anchored to text ranges and discussion threads follow the selection context.
Document review teams embedding a PDF UI into an application
Apryse WebViewer supports browser-based annotation anchored to PDF pages and includes document version comparison that supports reviewer workflows across updated documents.
Operations and contract teams handling scanned contracts and fast turnaround comments
Kami and Xodo PDF Studio both add OCR-backed selection so region-anchored threaded comments can attach to selected text on scanned pages.
Labeling teams that must map markup types into dataset-ready exports
Apryse WebViewer is designed for dataset-ready output, while PDF review tools like Adobe Acrobat and Drawboard PDF are limited for bounding-box and polygon-style ML labeling exports.
Desktop-first reviewers using layered markup during revision rounds
PDF Expert includes layer-aware controls and per-page toggle visibility, which supports multiple concurrent review markups staying readable.
Common pitfalls when selecting document annotation software
Teams often buy based on markup features but miss workflow compatibility with how annotations must be exported or reused downstream. Another failure mode is underestimating how schema or labeling export mapping affects dataset readiness. A third recurring problem is choosing tools optimized for review collaboration when the primary requirement is labeling throughput and export to dataset-style formats.
Assuming every PDF markup tool can export dataset-style bounding boxes and polygons
Adobe Acrobat, Xodo PDF Studio, and Drawboard PDF are review-first and do not provide native support for bounding-box and polygon labeling exports. Apryse WebViewer is dataset-ready but requires careful mapping from markup types to the target schema.
Ignoring OCR selection needs for scanned PDFs
Kami and Xodo PDF Studio add OCR-backed selection so highlights and threaded comments can anchor to scanned text regions. Tools without strong OCR-driven selection support increase manual effort when document text is not readily selectable.
Choosing review tooling without a revision comparison workflow
Apryse WebViewer and Nitro PDF Pro both provide revision-aware side-by-side comparison so reviewers can see changes alongside annotations. Desktop-only markup tools without revision comparison add extra coordination work during update cycles.
Overestimating governance and audit readiness without planning for integration work
Apryse WebViewer supports advanced governance and audit controls but dataset-ready output and control depth require integration work in the host application. UPDF and Kami place less emphasis on advanced governance and audit controls compared with labeling-first suites.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Apryse WebViewer, SuperAnnotate, Scale AI, and the other tools by prioritizing annotation anchor behavior on PDF rendering layers and the export usability for downstream review workflows. Features received the highest weight at 40% because browser or desktop markup must support region anchoring, threaded comments, and revision-aware review in practice.
Ease and value each received 30% because teams need annotation throughput and low friction for OCR selection and page navigation. Apryse WebViewer set the ranking because it combines browser-based annotation anchored to PDF pages with document version side-by-side comparison tied to a shared annotation workflow, and it produces dataset-ready output with explicit schema mapping implications.
Frequently Asked Questions About document annotation software
How do Apryse WebViewer and Kami handle revision-aware review on multi-version documents?
Which tools support anchored annotations on scanned PDFs via OCR-driven selection?
How can teams embed an annotation review UI into an existing portal with an API?
When do bounding-box or polygon-style labeling workflows fall short in PDF-first annotators like Adobe Acrobat?
What breaks when document comparison and markup layers must stay aligned across versions?
How do collaboration and comment threading differ between Hypothes.is and DocHub for shared review?
Which tool includes an admin-style access model suitable for authenticated teams moderating annotations?
How does UPDF keep markup aligned to pages during fast in-document review cycles?
Which tools support touch-first markup for pen and drawing on the document canvas?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
- Data Science AnalyticsTop 10 Best Annotation Software of 2026
- Digital Products And SoftwareTop 10 Best Document Tagging Software of 2026
- Data Science AnalyticsTop 10 Best Document Analytics Software of 2026
- Business FinanceTop 10 Best Text Annotation Software of 2026
- Technology Digital MediaTop 10 Best Video Annotation Software of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Data Science Analytics alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of data science analytics tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare data science analytics tools→