GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Healthcare MedicineTop 10 Best Diagnostic Medical Software of 2026
Ranking roundup of top diagnostic medical software tools for teams, with criteria and tradeoffs, including Proscia and PathAI.
How we ranked these tools
Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.
Search agents gather the source set and the review record, including transcriptions of video reviews and podcasts.
Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Proscia is the best pick if pathology teams need governed, AI-assisted slide review with consistent case routing and documentation, whereas PathAI fits teams that want AI-supported, repeatable diagnostic outputs integrated into lab workflows, and GE HealthCare Edison works better for enterprise imaging organizations integrating around PACS and reporting.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Proscia
AI-assisted whole slide review with case tasking and governed annotation captured in a review timeline.
Best for: Fits when pathology teams need governed, AI-assisted review with consistent case routing and documentation.
PathAI
Editor pickInference outputs are tied to pathology case workflows, with review-ready artifacts built around diagnostic model execution.
Best for: Fits when pathology teams need AI-assisted, repeatable case review outputs integrated into lab workflows.
Butterfly iQ
Editor pickDevice-guided acquisition workflow that routes captured evidence into standardized clinician outputs for review.
Best for: Fits when mobile ultrasound teams need consistent findings documentation before PACS archiving.
Comparison Table
Proscia
vertical specialistDigital pathology platform for slide management, diagnostic review, and AI-enabled pathology workflows.
AI-assisted whole slide review with case tasking and governed annotation captured in a review timeline.
Proscia is built for end-to-end pathology review where whole slide images and AI predictions are reviewed together in one workflow. The case layer supports tasking, review assignment, and annotation to capture clinical interpretation steps, not just image viewing. Governance features track user actions and support controlled workflows across readers and sign-out roles. Integration work targets lab IT patterns such as DICOM WSI interchange, HL7-related messaging, and results handoff tied to case identifiers.
A tradeoff is that the strongest value comes when lab teams standardize slide naming, case identifiers, and the review workflow so automation can route tasks reliably. In a high-throughput sign-out setting, the automation surface helps keep AI-assisted review consistent across multiple pathologists. For a smaller team, the most visible benefit is structured, repeatable review documentation rather than deep workflow orchestration across many downstream systems.
- +WSI review workflow links AI outputs to review decisions
- +Case tasking and annotation support consistent documentation
- +Audit trails support accountability for slide and decision steps
- +Automation-oriented integrations support results handoff by case
- –Workflow automation depends on consistent case identifiers and slide mapping
- –Advanced governance setups require careful role and workflow configuration
Pathology lab operations
Standardize AI-assisted sign-out workflow
More consistent sign-out throughput
Pathologists
Review WSI with decision trace
Clearer interpretive documentation
Show 1 more scenario
Health IT integration teams
Automate results handoff to LIS
Fewer manual reconciliation steps
IT teams connect case identifiers to downstream systems so AI outputs and sign-out results stay aligned.
Best for: Fits when pathology teams need governed, AI-assisted review with consistent case routing and documentation.
PathAI
vertical specialistDigital pathology and AI software for diagnostic support, biomarker analysis, and pathology workflow improvement.
Inference outputs are tied to pathology case workflows, with review-ready artifacts built around diagnostic model execution.
PathAI fits teams that already run a pathology digital workflow and need model outputs attached to specific cases, cohorts, and review steps. The practical workflow emphasis is on consistent inference runs, traceable outputs for downstream review, and tight coupling between lab operations and diagnostic use. This structure matters when pathology cases must move through review, validation, and sign-off without relying on manual copy-and-paste steps.
A notable tradeoff is that PathAI’s value concentrates on pathology image analysis rather than broad PACS broker routing or modality worklist management. It is a strong fit when pathology leadership wants automation around segmentation, detection, or classification outputs tied to case review, while PACS continues to handle DICOM archive and query-retrieve behavior.
- +Model outputs are generated for specific pathology cases and review steps
- +Structured results support consistent downstream interpretation and QA
- +Workflow emphasis reduces manual steps between inference and reviewer access
- +Clinical deployment focus aligns with diagnostic governance needs
- –Limited coverage of PACS routing and modality worklist automation
- –Integration depth can require partner-supported setup for local IT environments
- –Segmentation and detection workflows may demand data curation for best results
Digital pathology directors
AI-assisted tumor assessment workflows
More consistent diagnostic review
Pathology informatics teams
Model output workflow integration
Lower manual reconciliation
Show 1 more scenario
Clinical QA and validation leads
Repeatable model performance checks
Tighter governance over AI use
Supports validation processes by keeping inference artifacts aligned with case context for auditing.
Best for: Fits when pathology teams need AI-assisted, repeatable case review outputs integrated into lab workflows.
Butterfly iQ
SMBUltrasound software and device platform for point-of-care diagnostic imaging and guided assessments.
Device-guided acquisition workflow that routes captured evidence into standardized clinician outputs for review.
Butterfly iQ supports the point-of-care capture loop that many PACS-first workflows do not address, with device-to-document steps built around bedside scanning. The documentation flow emphasizes consistent capture and clinician-facing output, which can reduce manual rework when cases move to review and reporting. Integration depth is strongest where downstream systems accept exported clinical content rather than expecting deep DICOM routing as the primary contract.
A key tradeoff is that Butterfly iQ is not positioned as a full PACS archive or router replacement for study routing and query-retrieve workflows. It fits best in environments where clinicians need repeatable bedside documentation and then pass results to an existing PACS or document system for longitudinal storage. Usage tends to concentrate in acute care, outpatient procedural areas, and specialty clinics that benefit from rapid acquisition-to-report handoffs.
- +Point-of-care capture workflow reduces post-scan documentation overhead
- +Structured clinician outputs support consistent bedside-to-review handoffs
- +Mobile-first imaging flow fits rapid clinic and bedside scanning
- –Not a PACS broker replacement for study routing and query-retrieve
- –Deep governance controls may require tighter surrounding infrastructure
- –Integration paths may emphasize exports over full imaging archive connectivity
Point-of-care clinicians
Bedside ultrasound findings documentation
Reduced documentation time
Clinical operations leads
Standardizing exam evidence capture
More uniform documentation
Show 1 more scenario
Imaging IT coordinators
Passing results into existing archives
Lower integration friction
Exports and downstream handoff support continuity with existing PACS storage workflows.
Best for: Fits when mobile ultrasound teams need consistent findings documentation before PACS archiving.
GE HealthCare Edison
enterpriseClinical applications and AI-enabled imaging software platform for diagnostic interpretation and workflow orchestration.
Configurable study workflow behavior that standardizes routing and handoff steps across imaging and reading operations.
GE HealthCare Edison targets imaging and diagnostic workflow integration by connecting clinical systems to DICOM imaging and reporting processes. It provides configurable routing and workflow behavior for how studies move through reading, review, and downstream consumption in healthcare environments.
- +Workflow configuration supports consistent study handling across multiple sites
- +Integration focus fits PACS-adjacent environments that need RIS and downstream reporting linkage
- +Governance controls support role-based operation for reading and workflow tasks
- +Extensibility through interfaces supports custom integration with enterprise systems
- –Configuration depth increases setup time for teams without existing interface patterns
- –Advanced imaging workflow automation may require careful dependency management
Best for: Fits when healthcare organizations need governed, configurable imaging workflow integration around PACS and reporting.
Sectra
enterpriseEnterprise imaging and diagnostics software for radiology, pathology, cardiology, and orthopaedics.
Study routing configuration that enforces imaging workflow rules across modalities before studies reach readers.
Sectra runs imaging and diagnostics workflows with an enterprise PACS and image distribution design that fits hospitals needing governed access to clinical studies. The core system covers DICOM image viewing, study routing, and diagnostic worklists to support reading and reporting across departments.
- +Enterprise imaging workflow support with governed access for distributed reading teams
- +Configurable study routing rules reduce manual triage across modalities
- +Diagnostic worklist handling supports consistent reader intake at scale
- +Strong DICOM viewer integration for day-to-day study review
- –Requires careful configuration of workflow rules to avoid unintended study routing
- –Automation depends on integration patterns with existing hospital systems
Best for: Fits when radiology groups need governed PACS workflows and configurable study routing across multiple sites.
Visage 7
enterpriseHigh-performance medical imaging platform for diagnostic reading, visualization, and enterprise image access.
Visage 7’s configurable study presentation and workflow tooling supports standardized hanging layouts across reading sessions.
Visage 7 is built for radiology imaging viewing and workflow in environments that need tighter control than a generic DICOM viewer. It supports reading workflows with configurable study layouts, hanging protocols, and reporting integrations that plug into established imaging departments.
- +Strong configuration of reading layouts and study presentation for repeatable reviews
- +Workflow features align with imaging-department needs rather than generic document viewing
- +Integration depth supports operational use in PACS-centered environments
- +Extensibility for imaging workflow customization helps teams standardize practice
- –Configuration can demand dedicated governance to avoid inconsistent study presentation
- –HL7 and FHIR coverage depends on site integration design rather than viewer defaults
- –Custom workflow changes may require specialist effort instead of self-service
- –Advanced automation breadth can be harder to validate without a controlled pilot
Best for: Fits when radiology teams need a configurable viewer and imaging workflow controls integrated into PACS operations.
Aidoc
vertical specialistClinical AI platform that flags urgent findings and supports diagnostic imaging triage workflows.
Automated exam triage that assigns priority by detected findings and drives how flagged studies enter radiology review queues.
Aidoc is an imaging-focused diagnostic decision support system built to run alongside radiology workflows rather than replace reporting systems. It supports automated exam triage that flags studies based on detected findings and prioritizes worklists for faster review.
- +Detection-based triage routes flagged exams into review queues faster than manual sorting
- +Configurable study routing rules align alerts with departmental priorities and turnaround targets
- +Interoperability support fits common imaging transport and workflow systems
- +Operational controls help manage alert behavior across sites and scanners
- –Effectiveness depends on consistent imaging acquisition and workflow placement
- –Change control is required to adjust detection thresholds and queue logic safely
- –Some operational details require tight IT coordination with existing imaging infrastructure
- –Coverage breadth across every subspecialty imaging pathway may require validation per site
Best for: Fits when radiology teams want detection-driven triage and configurable routing without rebuilding PACS reporting workflows.
Clarius
SMBPortable ultrasound platform with mobile software for diagnostic imaging in multiple care settings.
Mobile-first ultrasound capture that carries studies into a clinician review and sharing workflow without switching between separate tools.
Clarius targets diagnostic imaging workflows with a focus on ultrasound acquisition, image review, and clinical sharing. The core workflow centers on capturing studies on supported mobile or bedside devices, then continuing interpretation in a web or viewer-centric experience for clinicians. Clarius positions its environment around integration into imaging and clinical processes so organizations can route, store, and reuse studies across teams.
- +Clinical imaging workflow design focused on ultrasound study capture and review
- +Sharing paths support fast handoff for clinicians in patient-facing scenarios
- +Workflow can reduce steps between capture, review, and clinical communication
- +Viewer-first interaction supports interpretation without heavy tool switching
- –Imaging archive and interoperability depth may lag PACS-centric platforms
- –DICOM workflow breadth and advanced routing controls require careful validation
- –Automation and API coverage can be insufficient for complex enterprise governance
- –Extensibility options may depend on partner integrations rather than native connectors
Best for: Fits when imaging teams need mobile ultrasound capture and clinician review with limited on-prem PACS customization.
NVIDIA Clara Imaging
enterpriseAI application framework for medical imaging workflows, inference, and deployment.
Clara Imaging’s AI inference pipeline components target GPU-accelerated, configurable study-level processing tied to DICOM I/O.
NVIDIA Clara Imaging provides medical imaging capabilities built around AI workflow building blocks and clinical-grade deployment options for imaging and diagnostic pipelines. Core capabilities include DICOM image handling, configurable AI inference workflows, and integration points meant to connect imaging sources to downstream analysis and reporting steps.
- +GPU-accelerated AI inference designed for study-scale throughput
- +DICOM-aware I/O paths for connecting imaging data to pipelines
- +Pipeline-style components support segmentation and image preprocessing workflows
- +Inference orchestration fits into larger orchestration stacks via integration surfaces
- –Full diagnostic imaging workflow coverage depends on surrounding systems
- –Clinical governance controls like RBAC and audit logging rely on integration design
- –Operational performance tuning requires GPU and pipeline configuration discipline
- –Interfacing with HIS and ordering flows often needs custom glue code
Best for: Fits when imaging teams need GPU-accelerated AI processing wired into existing DICOM workflows and downstream readers.
Fujifilm Synapse
enterpriseDiagnostic imaging software suite for PACS, visualization, and radiology workflow management.
Workflow orchestration that coordinates imaging inputs, processing steps, and clinical outputs under site-level operational controls.
Fujifilm Synapse targets diagnostic workflow teams that need imaging analytics and clinical content handling tied to enterprise integration, not just viewer features. The product combines imaging data management for reading workflows with configurable routing and reporting outputs that fit radiology operations.
- +Configurable workflow orchestration for study and report handoffs
- +Operational controls for managing integration behavior across sites
- +Imaging-focused processing aligned to diagnostic reading pipelines
- +Extensibility options for workflow automation tied to enterprise systems
- –Requires integration engineering work to fit into existing PACS and RIS flows
- –Advanced governance and audit expectations increase project administration effort
- –Out-of-the-box configuration coverage varies by imaging workflow complexity
- –Certain imaging transformation steps can depend on add-on components
Best for: Fits when radiology groups need workflow orchestration and enterprise integration for imaging-heavy diagnostic operations.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 diagnostic medical software, Proscia stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Diagnostic Medical Software
The diagnostic medical software field includes systems built for imaging and pathology review workflows, from Proscia’s governed AI-assisted whole slide review timeline to PathAI’s case-tied inference artifacts. Teams also compare imaging workflow and routing capabilities across PACS-adjacent platforms like GE HealthCare Edison and Sectra, alongside mobile ultrasound capture in Clarius and device-guided clinician output flows in Butterfly iQ.
This buyer’s guide narrows the selection to tools that matter in day-to-day review, routing, and documentation behavior. It uses integration depth, automation and API surface, and admin and governance controls as the decision lens when the underlying workflow supports those controls, with Proscia, PathAI, and Butterfly iQ used to highlight the tradeoffs between pathology review governance and imaging acquisition handoffs.
Diagnostic Medical Software for imaging workflow routing, review governance, and AI-assisted interpretation
Diagnostic medical software coordinates clinical review and interpretation by connecting acquisition inputs, workflow states, and output artifacts into repeatable handling across radiology or pathology teams. In imaging workflows, that includes study handling behavior around readers and downstream reporting linkages, where tools like GE HealthCare Edison and Sectra focus on configurable routing and handoff steps.
In pathology, diagnostic review hinges on governed case documentation and AI output traceability, which is the core of Proscia’s whole slide review workflow that links AI outputs to review decisions and captures governed annotation in a review timeline. PathAI emphasizes inference outputs tied to specific pathology case workflows that produce review-ready artifacts for consistent downstream QA and interpretation.
Evaluation criteria for Diagnostic Medical Software workflows and governance
Diagnostic medical software must connect review work with the right clinical artifacts, not just display images or generate outputs. The strongest platforms tie automation results to the exact review steps where teams make decisions and where teams later need traceability.
Routing and admin controls determine whether flagged cases arrive with the intended context and whether review decisions stay auditable. The features below focus on integration behavior, automation fit, and governance mechanics across imaging and pathology workflows.
AI output traceability to review decisions
Proscia links AI outputs to governed review decisions inside a whole slide review timeline, with review-ready annotation captured as part of the case workflow. PathAI ties inference outputs to specific pathology case workflows that produce review-ready artifacts for consistent downstream QA.
Configurable study routing and handoff behavior
Sectra provides study routing configuration that enforces imaging workflow rules across modalities before studies reach readers. GE HealthCare Edison adds configurable study workflow behavior to standardize routing and handoff steps across imaging and reading operations.
Reader workflow controls for repeatable interpretation sessions
Visage 7 focuses on configurable study presentation and workflow tooling that supports standardized hanging layouts across reading sessions. Proscia complements interpretation traceability with a governed review timeline that captures how teams act on AI-assisted review.
Detection-driven triage into review queues
Aidoc automates exam triage by assigning priority based on detected findings and routing flagged studies into radiology review queues. Sectra enforces governed routing via study routing rules, which can reduce manual triage across modalities.
Acquisition-to-clinician handoff structure for ultrasound capture
Butterfly iQ uses a device-guided acquisition workflow that routes captured evidence into standardized clinician outputs for review. Clarius carries mobile ultrasound capture into a clinician review and sharing workflow designed to reduce handoff friction without deep on-prem PACS customization.
Automation and orchestration across imaging inputs and clinical outputs
Fujifilm Synapse coordinates imaging inputs, processing steps, and clinical outputs under site-level operational controls. NVIDIA Clara Imaging targets GPU-accelerated inference pipeline components wired into existing DICOM I/O for study-level processing.
How to choose based on workflow ownership, routing complexity, and governance expectations
Choice depends on where operational risk lives in the workflow. For imaging routing, misrouted or inconsistently queued studies create immediate throughput and turnaround issues. For pathology review, missing traceability between AI outputs and review decisions creates QA gaps.
The decision steps below separate teams choosing primarily for governance and annotation behavior from teams choosing primarily for routing, triage, or acquisition-to-review handoffs. Each step routes to a different product philosophy among Proscia, PathAI, and Butterfly iQ while keeping the rest of the top list as the comparison set.
Pick the platform that defines the review record
If the core requirement is a governed review record that ties AI-assisted outputs to the exact decisions and annotations made during review, select Proscia for its review timeline that links AI outputs to review decisions. If the core requirement is review-ready inference artifacts generated per pathology case workflow step, select PathAI for its case-tied inference outputs built around diagnostic model execution.
Decide whether routing is a rules problem or a triage problem
If routing and handoff need governed configuration across modalities and sites, select Sectra for governed study routing rules or GE HealthCare Edison for configurable study workflow behavior that standardizes routing and handoff steps. If prioritization needs to come from detected findings, select Aidoc because it assigns priority by detected findings and routes flagged studies into review queues.
Choose based on where standardization must happen
If standardization must happen at the reading-session UI and hanging layout behavior, select Visage 7 for configurable study presentation and workflow tooling. If standardization must happen at the moment clinicians capture and document findings before review, select Butterfly iQ for device-guided acquisition that routes evidence into standardized clinician outputs.
Evaluate automation scope relative to existing integration patterns
If the requirement is orchestration of study and report handoffs across site-level operational controls, select Fujifilm Synapse for configurable workflow orchestration under operational controls. If the requirement is GPU-accelerated inference pipeline components connected to study-level DICOM I/O, select NVIDIA Clara Imaging for its AI inference pipeline tied to DICOM I/O.
Avoid assuming imaging routing depth matches capture workflows
If the platform is expected to act as a study routing and PACS broker replacement, avoid positioning Butterfly iQ as the routing control plane because it is not a PACS broker replacement for study routing and query-retrieve. If capture and sharing depth under limited on-prem PACS customization is the priority, select Clarius for mobile-first ultrasound capture that carries studies into clinician review and sharing.
Who should use which Diagnostic Medical Software category focus
The top diagnostic medical software fits different operational roles, even when teams use them together. The right fit depends on whether the organization owns routing governance, review documentation, or acquisition-to-review handoffs.
The segments below describe teams that most directly benefit from Proscia, PathAI, and Butterfly iQ, then clarify how other top tools map to adjacent needs.
Pathology departments needing governed AI-assisted whole slide review documentation
Proscia supports AI-assisted whole slide review with governed annotation captured in a review timeline so teams can connect AI outputs to review decisions and documentation.
Pathology labs prioritizing repeatable case-tied inference artifacts for QA
PathAI focuses on inference outputs tied to specific pathology case workflows and builds review-ready artifacts that support consistent downstream QA and interpretation.
Mobile ultrasound teams needing structured capture and bedside-to-review handoffs
Butterfly iQ uses a device-guided acquisition workflow that routes captured evidence into standardized clinician outputs, which reduces post-scan documentation overhead before review.
Radiology groups requiring governed imaging study routing across modalities and distributed reading
Sectra enforces imaging workflow rules with configurable study routing to reduce manual triage across modalities while supporting governed access for distributed reading teams.
Imaging operations teams needing configurable study workflow behavior for routing and reporting linkage
GE HealthCare Edison standardizes routing and handoff steps through configurable study workflow behavior and targets PACS-adjacent environments that link to downstream reporting.
Common pitfalls when selecting Diagnostic Medical Software
Selection failures usually show up as workflow misalignment rather than missing features on a demo checklist. Teams often underestimate how much governance depends on identifier consistency, configuration discipline, and surrounding infrastructure fit.
The pitfalls below map to concrete behavior gaps seen across the evaluated tools.
Treating AI review traceability as interchangeable with inference output generation
Proscia links AI outputs to review decisions and captures governed annotation in a review timeline, while PathAI emphasizes review-ready inference artifacts tied to pathology case workflows.
Assuming mobile capture tools can replace routing control planes
Butterfly iQ is not a PACS broker replacement for study routing and query-retrieve, so imaging routing governance still needs a PACS-adjacent routing layer like Sectra or GE HealthCare Edison.
Configuring routing rules without governance discipline for unintended study handling
Sectra requires careful configuration of workflow rules to avoid unintended study routing, and Aidoc requires change control to adjust detection thresholds and queue logic safely.
Overestimating how quickly automation succeeds without consistent mapping inputs
Proscia workflow automation depends on consistent case identifiers and slide mapping, so mismatched identifiers can break traceability between AI outputs and review decisions.
Choosing an orchestration tool without the integration engineering capacity to fit PACS and RIS flows
Fujifilm Synapse requires integration engineering work to fit into existing PACS and RIS flows, so project administration effort increases when governance and audit expectations are high.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated each tool on workflow integration depth, automation and AI output placement into review steps, and admin and governance control behavior. Features received 40% weight because traceability, routing rules, and reading-session controls determine day-to-day correctness more than display features.
Ease and value each received 30% weight because these platforms require configuration discipline, and the evaluated workflows can increase or reduce operational overhead. Proscia separated itself by linking AI-assisted whole slide review outputs to governed review decisions inside a review timeline with case tasking and annotation support captured as review documentation.
Frequently Asked Questions About Diagnostic Medical Software
How do Proscia and PathAI differ in handling AI outputs during the review timeline?
When comparing PACS-adjacent platforms, how do Sectra and Visage 7 approach study routing rules?
Which tool best supports detection-driven triage into review worklists for radiology studies?
What breaks when a pathology team needs structured reporting tied to AI-assisted review rather than image viewing only?
How do Butterfly iQ and Clarius differ for mobile ultrasound workflows that must feed downstream review?
When orchestration across imaging sites is the priority, how do Fujifilm Synapse and GE HealthCare Edison differ?
How do integrations and APIs typically differ between NVIDIA Clara Imaging and PACS-style workflow platforms like Sectra?
What admin controls and audit behaviors are most relevant when rotating reviewers or auditing who approved which diagnostic content?
Which platform best fits a team that needs study workflow behavior customization around DICOM handling rather than viewer customization alone?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Funding and competing interests
This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.
They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.
Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →
- Healthcare MedicineTop 10 Best Medical Diagnostic Software of 2026
- Healthcare MedicineTop 10 Best Medical Diagnostics Software of 2026
- Healthcare MedicineTop 10 Best Diagnostic Imaging Software of 2026
- Healthcare MedicineTop 10 Best Diagnostic Car Software of 2026
- Healthcare MedicineTop 10 Best Diagnostic Computer Software of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Healthcare Medicine alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of healthcare medicine tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare healthcare medicine tools→