Top 5 Best Cpu Bitcoin Mining Software of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE

Environment Energy

Top 5 Best Cpu Bitcoin Mining Software of 2026

Top 10 ranked cpu bitcoin mining software for CPU mining, covering performance and stability across tools like CPUMiner-Multi, XMRig, and SRBMiner-Multi.

26 min readUpdated AI-verified · Expert reviewed
How we ranked these tools
01Feature Verification

Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.

02Multimedia Review Aggregation

Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.

03Synthetic User Modeling

AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.

04Human Editorial Review

Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.

Read our full methodology →

Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy

This ranked list targets operators and technical evaluators running CPU-focused Bitcoin mining who need stable work scheduling and predictable payout behavior. The comparison prioritizes performance characteristics like multi-thread throughput and pool protocol compatibility, plus operational controls that reduce downtime during long runs across mixed hardware.

MinerGate is the best fit if you want a simple Windows desktop GUI for pool CPU mining with ongoing telemetry, whereas Kryptex suits individuals who prefer low-ops personal mining with clear CPU telemetry and withdrawals, and cpuminer is a strong alternative when you’re running a single CPU mining node and can handle manual tuning for a clean pool setup.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

MinerGate

Graphical mining workflow that manages CPU thread allocation and share acceptance monitoring without manual Stratum endpoint setup.

Built for fits when a single Windows desktop needs pool CPU mining with simple controls and ongoing telemetry..

2

Kryptex

Editor pick

Live accepted and rejected share telemetry paired with simple payout tracking inside the client UI.

Built for fits when individuals want CPU mining telemetry and low-ops operation on personal machines..

3

cpuminer

Editor pick

Thread count control mapped directly to mining workload allocation for stable CPU scheduling on fixed hosts.

Built for fits when a single CPU mining node needs simple pool setup and manual tuning discipline..

Comparison Table

1
MinerGateBest overall
SMB
9.5/10
Overall
2
9.2/10
Overall
3
vertical specialist
8.9/10
Overall
4
8.6/10
Overall
5
8.4/10
Overall
#1

MinerGate

SMB

GUI mining client with merged mining pools supporting CPU and GPU cryptocurrency extraction.

9.5/10
Overall
Features9.4/10
Ease of Use9.4/10
Value9.7/10
Standout feature

Graphical mining workflow that manages CPU thread allocation and share acceptance monitoring without manual Stratum endpoint setup.

MinerGate’s core capability is connecting a CPU miner to a pool endpoint and routing accepted and rejected shares back to the pool for payout accounting. The client exposes mining controls like thread count and includes telemetry that tracks hash performance signals and share outcomes during runtime. That shape fits CPU miners that need to start quickly without manual pool configuration for every network change.

A tradeoff is that MinerGate’s experience centers on pool mining workflows, so solo mining control, block-level guidance, and fine-grained protocol tuning are limited compared with miners aimed at Stratum configuration control. MinerGate works well for a single machine use case where thread allocation can be adjusted to manage CPU utilization while monitoring share acceptance.

Pros
  • +Pool-centric setup with share submission and payout attribution via wallet address
  • +Thread allocation controls to balance CPU utilization and throughput
  • +Live telemetry for hash and share status during runtime
  • +Prebuilt client workflow avoids manual miner and pool scripting
Cons
  • Limited solo mining and protocol tuning compared with CLI-first miners
  • Queueing and monitoring depth is thinner than specialized mining suites
  • Advanced hardware-specific tuning hooks are not the primary workflow
Use scenarios
  • Independent miners

    Start CPU pool mining quickly

    Faster pool participation

  • Home lab operators

    Balance mining and daily workloads

    Stable system responsiveness

Show 1 more scenario
  • Small teams

    Standardize one-miner deployment

    Lower setup variance

    Use a guided client workflow to keep miner setup consistent across a small number of machines.

Best for: Fits when a single Windows desktop needs pool CPU mining with simple controls and ongoing telemetry.

#2

Kryptex

SMB

Desktop mining software supporting CPU mining with cryptocurrency withdrawals including Bitcoin.

9.2/10
Overall
Features9.4/10
Ease of Use9.2/10
Value9.0/10
Standout feature

Live accepted and rejected share telemetry paired with simple payout tracking inside the client UI.

Kryptex manages mining operation and pool connectivity in a way that avoids manual stratum protocol setup for most users. Mining telemetry is presented as live status and performance feedback, which helps interpret accepted share versus rejected share behavior without log parsing. Thread allocation settings let users cap CPU usage by tuning mining thread count and overall CPU utilization to reduce desktop impact.

A tradeoff is that Kryptex provides less room for advanced mining-node customization than lower-level tools that expose full stratum control and configuration file tuning. Kryptex works best for home or small office mining where frequent hands-on configuration changes are not the goal and stability matters more than low-level experimentation.

Pros
  • +Thread allocation controls limit desktop CPU utilization during mining
  • +Share outcome visibility reduces reliance on log-based troubleshooting
  • +Operational flow avoids manual stratum protocol configuration for most users
  • +Stable desktop-friendly runtime reduces setup friction
Cons
  • Limited low-level tuning versus configurable mining clients
  • Advanced processor instruction set and memory tuning options are not exposed
  • Fine-grained governance controls for teams are not geared for multi-operator setups
Use scenarios
  • Home desktop users

    Mining in the background with CPU caps

    Lower desktop disruption

  • Independent operators

    Interpreting rejected shares quickly

    Faster issue detection

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Small offices

    Single-machine mining without stratum setup

    Less administration time

    Pool connectivity and runtime management reduce time spent on configuration files.

  • Mac and Windows users

    CPU mining with minimal tooling

    Quicker start

    The client workflow supports mining on common desktops without specialized mining-node deployment.

Best for: Fits when individuals want CPU mining telemetry and low-ops operation on personal machines.

#3

cpuminer

vertical specialist

Multi-threaded optimized CPU miner for Bitcoin and Litecoin supporting Stratum and getblocktemplate protocols.

8.9/10
Overall
Features9.0/10
Ease of Use9.1/10
Value8.7/10
Standout feature

Thread count control mapped directly to mining workload allocation for stable CPU scheduling on fixed hosts.

cpuminer uses a straightforward configuration file to define the wallet or worker identity, pool host and port, and the thread count for CPU hashing. Mining telemetry is mainly via console output and periodic status lines rather than a management API. This shape fits test rigs and single-purpose mining nodes where operational changes happen by editing config and restarting the process.

A key tradeoff is limited automation around worker lifecycle and monitoring, which shifts responsibility to external scripts and system tooling. cpuminer is a strong fit when only one algorithm target is needed and a stable pool connection is expected, such as a fixed CPU host in a controlled network.

Pros
  • +Lean command-line workflow with config-file driven pool connections
  • +Simple thread allocation controls for predictable CPU utilization
  • +Good fit for single-host mining without extra management layers
  • +Mature codebase history supports known operational behavior
Cons
  • Limited automation surface for worker management and health checks
  • Operational tuning relies on thread count selection discipline
  • Telemetry is console-focused rather than API-based monitoring
  • Less suitable for multi-algorithm or multi-pool orchestration
Use scenarios
  • Homelab operators

    Single pool mining on one host

    Consistent share submission rate

  • IT automation teams

    Managed restart on schedule

    Predictable mining uptime windows

Show 1 more scenario
  • Research labs

    Controlled CPU hashing benchmarks

    Repeatable throughput measurements

    Pin thread counts and observe mining output to compare CPU instruction set behavior under load.

Best for: Fits when a single CPU mining node needs simple pool setup and manual tuning discipline.

#4

NiceHash Miner

SMB

Mining software that uses CPU resources and pays supported earnings in Bitcoin.

8.6/10
Overall
Features8.8/10
Ease of Use8.6/10
Value8.5/10
Standout feature

Marketplace-backed hashing purchase ties payout behavior to share results and accepted work tracking.

NiceHash Miner is an easy-to-run CPU Bitcoin mining client centered on paying for hashing power through its marketplace workflow rather than direct solo mining. It manages CPU mining threads, monitors pool-side share results, and keeps logs for accepted and rejected shares so operators can spot instability. The software also provides automation-friendly configuration so mining can be restarted and tuned without manual command-line work.

Pros
  • +Marketplace-style payout flow reduces operational pool bookkeeping
  • +CPU thread control and monitoring simplify hash rate tuning
  • +Share acceptance and rejection telemetry helps diagnose instability
  • +Configuration and process handling support unattended mining runs
Cons
  • Direct control over stratum targets is less granular than pool-native miners
  • CPU tuning changes can require repeated restarts to stabilize throughput
  • Mining telemetry is not deep enough for fine-grained performance forensics
  • Advanced governance and role-based access for team use is limited

Best for: Fits when solo operation is not required and operators want CPU mining with clear share feedback and low operational overhead.

#5

Awesome Miner

SMB

Mining management software that can configure CPU miners and Bitcoin pool algorithms.

8.4/10
Overall
Features8.6/10
Ease of Use8.2/10
Value8.3/10
Standout feature

Device and miner orchestration inside a single management console, with rule-driven restarts and pool failover style workflows.

Awesome Miner is CPU bitcoin mining management software that centralizes multiple mining nodes under one console. It controls common miners via configurable profiles, auto-start policies, and target management for mining pool connectivity and wallet payouts.

It also collects mining telemetry like hash rate, shares, and per-device status so operators can troubleshoot rejections and stratum connectivity issues quickly. Automation features focus on orchestration and monitoring rather than raw CPU hashing performance.

Pros
  • +Central console for monitoring and control across many CPU mining nodes
  • +Profile-based miner and pool configuration reduces repetitive per-host edits
  • +Telemetry includes accepted and rejected share signals for faster triage
  • +Automated restarts help recover from miner hangs or lost pool connections
Cons
  • Real throughput gains depend on choosing and tuning the underlying CPU miner
  • Operational overhead rises when managing many endpoints and custom profiles
  • API surface is limited for bespoke external automation compared with higher-control tooling
  • Granular thread allocation rules can require careful per-device configuration

Best for: Fits when mid-size teams need centralized monitoring and automated recovery for multiple CPU mining endpoints without custom orchestration code.

Conclusion

After evaluating 5 environment energy, MinerGate stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
MinerGate

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

How to Choose the Right cpu bitcoin mining software

CPU bitcoin mining software for hash computations on general-purpose processors typically centers on thread allocation controls, pool connectivity, and share outcome telemetry. This guide covers MinerGate, Kryptex, cpuminer, NiceHash Miner, and Awesome Miner, chosen for stable CPU mining operation and practical day-to-day controls.

The evaluation emphasis favors integration depth and operational control at the mining workflow level, not just raw hashing capability. MinerGate leads with a graphical workflow that manages CPU thread allocation and share acceptance monitoring without manual Stratum endpoint setup. Kryptex is included for its live accepted and rejected share telemetry plus simple payout tracking inside the client UI.

cpuminer is included for config-file driven pool connections and explicit thread count mapping to workload allocation. NiceHash Miner and Awesome Miner are included to reflect marketplace-backed payout flows and centralized multi-endpoint orchestration with rule-driven restarts and profile-based configuration.

CPU bitcoin mining software that runs SHA-256 mining workloads with thread control and pool share telemetry

CPU bitcoin mining software is a mining client that schedules CPU threads to drive SHA-256 hashing, connects to a mining pool using Stratum, and reports share results such as accepted versus rejected. In MinerGate, the workflow focuses on pool-centric controls that adjust thread allocation to balance CPU utilization and throughput while tracking share submission tied to a wallet address.

Kryptex also targets operability on personal machines by pairing live accepted and rejected share telemetry with payout tracking inside the client UI. cpuminer emphasizes explicit control by using a config-file pool setup and thread count selection to keep CPU scheduling predictable on fixed hosts.

CPU mining controls that tie thread scheduling to share telemetry

CPU bitcoin mining software lives or dies by how well it controls CPU thread allocation while showing share outcomes like accepted and rejected submissions. Share telemetry matters because it is the fastest signal that the miner is actually finding valid work for the selected pool settings.

Control depth matters because CPU hashing throughput depends on stable thread scheduling and workload targeting on a fixed host. Integration depth matters because pool connectivity and share submission need to be handled without fragile manual endpoint configuration.

  • Thread allocation controls tied to CPU utilization

    MinerGate provides graphical thread allocation controls that balance desktop CPU utilization and throughput while tracking share acceptance. Kryptex also includes thread allocation controls to cap desktop CPU usage during mining while keeping the UI centered on share outcomes.

  • Live accepted and rejected share telemetry

    Kryptex surfaces both accepted and rejected share visibility in the client UI so troubleshooting does not rely on log-only workflows. MinerGate also monitors share acceptance so operators can confirm pool submissions tied to the configured wallet address.

  • Config-file pool setup with explicit thread count mapping

    cpuminer supports config-file driven pool connections and maps thread count directly to mining workload allocation for predictable CPU scheduling. This setup fits operators who prefer command-line discipline over continuous UI-driven monitoring.

  • Operational orchestration across multiple mining endpoints

    Awesome Miner centralizes device and miner orchestration in a single management console with profile-based configuration and rule-driven restarts. This approach suits multi-node CPU mining where automated recovery and monitoring across hosts matters more than single-machine simplicity.

  • Marketplace-backed payout flow with clear share feedback

    NiceHash Miner ties payout behavior to marketplace-style hashing purchases and tracks accepted work results for transparent share feedback. This design reduces pool bookkeeping compared with pool-native workflows while keeping CPU thread control and monitoring for throughput tuning.

Pick the workflow philosophy: UI monitoring, CLI tuning, or multi-node orchestration

The decision should start with how the operator wants to manage CPU thread allocation and share verification during long-running mining sessions. Miner workflows differ most in how they handle pool connectivity setup, how they surface accepted versus rejected shares, and how they support multi-endpoint recovery.

Next, choose the operational model that matches host count and governance needs. A single desktop needs lightweight telemetry and controls, while multiple nodes need centralized orchestration and restart rules to prevent silent mining failures.

  • Choose a control plane based on host count and recovery expectations

    For one Windows desktop, MinerGate’s graphical workflow with thread allocation controls and share acceptance monitoring reduces the need for manual endpoint setup. For multiple CPU mining endpoints, Awesome Miner’s centralized console and profile-based configuration reduce repetitive per-host edits and enable automated recovery via rule-driven restarts.

  • Decide whether troubleshooting should be UI-driven or config-driven

    If troubleshooting must happen inside a client UI, Kryptex provides live accepted and rejected share telemetry plus simple payout tracking so issues can be detected without log workflows. If operations rely on configuration files and explicit thread count selection discipline, cpuminer maps thread count to workload allocation for stable CPU scheduling.

  • Select the pool and share submission workflow that matches payout expectations

    If payout behavior should follow marketplace-style hashing purchases with clear accepted work tracking, NiceHash Miner shifts operational bookkeeping away from pool-native management. If payout attribution should be tied to a wallet address with share submission and payout attribution visible in the workflow, MinerGate provides pool-centric controls with ongoing telemetry.

  • Verify how granular the miner’s CPU tuning loop is for your hardware

    Use tools that expose thread allocation controls inside the main workflow if desktop CPU utilization must stay within a predictable envelope, which matches MinerGate and Kryptex for personal machines. Use cpuminer when predictable CPU scheduling on fixed hosts matters most and thread count selection is the primary tuning mechanism.

  • Check whether setup and monitoring depth covers the entire mining day

    If queueing and monitoring depth needs to be deeper than basic telemetry, avoid UI-focused tooling with thinner monitoring depth and limited solo mining coverage. If monitoring must include pool failover style behavior and automated recovery across many hosts, Awesome Miner’s orchestration features better match that requirement.

Who benefits from CPU mining software built around thread control and telemetry

CPU bitcoin mining software fits specific operational styles because thread allocation controls and share telemetry depth determine whether mining issues get noticed quickly. The best match depends on whether mining runs on a single desktop, multiple endpoints, or a marketplace-style payout flow.

Each tool in this guide aligns to a different daily workflow pattern, from graphical single-machine mining to centralized multi-node orchestration.

  • Single Windows desktop operators running pool CPU mining

    MinerGate fits because it delivers pool-centric setup with graphical thread allocation controls and ongoing share acceptance monitoring without manual Stratum endpoint setup. Kryptex also fits because it keeps accepted and rejected share telemetry plus payout tracking inside the client UI to reduce log-based troubleshooting.

  • Operators who prefer command-line discipline for stable CPU scheduling

    cpuminer fits because it uses config-file pool connections and maps thread count directly to mining workload allocation for predictable CPU utilization. This model rewards operators who tune through configuration rather than UI-based monitoring loops.

  • Small teams managing multiple CPU mining endpoints

    Awesome Miner fits because it centralizes monitoring and control across many CPU mining nodes in one console. Its profile-based configuration and rule-driven restarts support automated recovery without custom orchestration code.

  • Operators who want marketplace-style payout behavior tied to accepted work

    NiceHash Miner fits because it provides a marketplace-backed payout flow that ties payout behavior to share results and accepted work tracking. This reduces pool-native bookkeeping while keeping thread control and monitoring for CPU tuning.

Common pitfalls when selecting CPU mining software for SHA-256 workloads

Many failed CPU mining setups trace back to mismatches between how operators expect tuning to work and how a tool actually exposes operational controls. The biggest mistakes occur when share verification requires UI depth that the chosen client does not provide or when monitoring and orchestration coverage does not match the host count.

Avoid decisions that lock mining into a workflow with limited solo mining support when solo operation is part of the plan, or that assume tuning changes stabilize without restarts when the miner requires repeated restarts to stabilize throughput.

  • Choosing a UI-first miner but expecting deep monitoring and protocol tuning knobs

    MinerGate provides graphical thread allocation and share acceptance monitoring, but its limited solo mining and protocol tuning depth can become a blocker for operators who need low-level control. Kryptex provides live accepted and rejected telemetry, but it does not expose the same low-level tuning surface as configurable mining clients.

  • Running cpuminer without a tuning discipline for thread count and host stability

    cpuminer maps thread count directly to workload allocation, so throughput stability depends on disciplined thread selection for the fixed host. Skipping a structured tuning pass can lead to CPU utilization swings and inconsistent share outcomes.

  • Using a single-node workflow on multi-endpoint mining without centralized recovery

    Awesome Miner is built for multi-endpoint monitoring with a central console, profile-based configuration, and rule-driven restarts. Selecting a single-machine client for multiple nodes increases operational overhead and can delay detection of failed miners.

  • Assuming marketplace-style payout behavior equals pool-native control granularity

    NiceHash Miner reduces operational pool bookkeeping with marketplace-style payout flow and accepted work tracking. Direct control over stratum targets is less granular than pool-native miners, and CPU tuning changes can require repeated restarts to stabilize throughput.

How We Selected and Ranked These Tools

We evaluated MinerGate, Kryptex, cpuminer, NiceHash Miner, and Awesome Miner on feature coverage for CPU thread allocation and share outcome visibility, plus operational ease for running SHA-256 mining workloads on general-purpose processors. Features received the largest weight at 40%, then ease and value each received 30% to reflect how quickly an operator can keep mining stable and verify accepted versus rejected shares. MinerGate led the ranking because its graphical workflow manages CPU thread allocation and monitors share acceptance without manual Stratum endpoint setup, which reduces setup friction and shortens the feedback loop when shares fail.

Frequently Asked Questions About cpu bitcoin mining software

How do CPUMiner-Multi, XMRig, and cpuminer differ in CPU thread allocation control for stable hashing?
cpuminer centers its workflow on a local configuration file that maps mining threads directly to the mining host workload. MinerGate provides a desktop UI control for CPU thread allocation with live mining telemetry, which helps validate scheduling under real conditions. Kryptex also exposes thread allocation and CPU utilization adjustments, but it prioritizes share outcome visibility over manual pool endpoint setup.
When does a pool-first workflow matter more than solo mining automation in CPU Bitcoin mining software?
NiceHash Miner is designed around marketplace-backed hashing rather than solo mining, so its operational loop targets pool-like share feedback and restart behavior. MinerGate also focuses on pool participation and share submission, so orchestration stays mostly inside the client while solo-specific coordination is not the primary model. Awesome Miner fits multi-node pool operations where central monitoring and automated restarts reduce manual intervention across endpoints.
Which tool provides the clearest accepted and rejected share telemetry inside the client UI?
Kryptex pairs mining telemetry with payout-oriented tracking so accepted and rejected share outcomes are visible during runtime. NiceHash Miner keeps logs for accepted and rejected shares so instability can be identified from share behavior. MinerGate also monitors share acceptance, but it packages that around a graphical mining workflow focused on thread allocation and live telemetry.
What breaks if a miner uses the wrong pool endpoint configuration in a CPU mining setup?
cpuminer depends on correct runtime configuration to reach the mining pool and submit shares, so incorrect pool endpoint or connectivity fails share acceptance. MinerGate reduces endpoint setup friction by packaging the mining workflow for a pool connection, but the client still cannot submit shares if network access or pool settings are unreachable. Awesome Miner mitigates this at scale by managing miner profiles and target management, but a shared misconfiguration still blocks all nodes until profiles are corrected.
How should operators plan data migration when switching from one CPU mining client to another?
NiceHash Miner and MinerGate both tie mining runtime behavior to a wallet address workflow, so migration is mainly about re-entering wallet and ensuring accepted share tracking continues after the switch. cpuminer migration typically involves translating thread and pool settings into its configuration file so the new worker maintains the same runtime tuning. Awesome Miner makes migration easier for fleets because it centralizes multiple miners under profiles, so nodes can be repointed by updating target management settings.
Which approach works better for multi-node operations: centralized management in Awesome Miner or standalone clients on each host?
Awesome Miner centralizes monitoring and automation across multiple CPU mining endpoints and manages miners through configurable profiles. MinerGate, Kryptex, and NiceHash Miner are designed for single-host operation with UI-level controls, so multi-node orchestration requires manual coordination outside the client. For teams that need rule-driven restarts and pool failover style workflows, Awesome Miner reduces the operational surface area compared with running separate desktop miners.
How do logs and monitoring capabilities differ when troubleshooting stale shares and share rejection causes?
NiceHash Miner maintains accepted and rejected share logs so operators can correlate instability with mining restarts and pool-side share results. Awesome Miner collects mining telemetry like hash rate and per-device status across endpoints, which helps isolate whether rejections align with a specific node. Kryptex emphasizes live telemetry paired with rejected share visibility in the client UI, which supports fast checks of CPU utilization changes during runtime.
When does CPU utilization control become a limiting factor for mining throughput on shared systems?
Kryptex includes thread allocation and CPU utilization adjustments, so mining throughput can drop when thread limits are enforced to protect interactive desktop workloads. MinerGate similarly exposes thread allocation controls, so aggressive thread counts can raise hash performance but also increase user-visible CPU load. cpuminer provides direct thread count control via its configuration file, so throughput depends on operator tuning discipline for each host’s available headroom.
What security and admin controls should be considered when multiple users manage mining configuration on the same machine?
Awesome Miner supports centralized operational controls across devices, which reduces the risk of inconsistent miner profiles when multiple operators access management via a single console. MinerGate and Kryptex focus on local desktop operation, so admin control typically remains tied to the user who can change the mining configuration and thread allocation settings. cpuminer’s configuration file model also requires governance around file permissions because incorrect or tampered settings can redirect pool connections and worker behavior.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

Logos provided by Logo.dev

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.