GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Legal Professional ServicesTop 8 Best Conveyancing Management Software of 2026
Top 10 Best Conveyancing Management Software. Compare leading tools and rankings for law firms, including cosmoLex, Actionstep, and Clio Manage.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
cosmoLex
Integrated trust accounting and compliance reporting connected directly to matter records
Built for conveyancing-focused firms needing case management plus trust-compliance workflow support.
Actionstep
Visual workflow builder for automating conveyancing matter stages, tasks, and triggers
Built for conveyancing teams needing configurable workflows, document control, and deadline tracking.
Clio Manage
Matter-centered timeline that logs tasks, deadlines, and communication in one view
Built for conveyancing teams managing multiple active matters with structured tasks.
Related reading
Comparison Table
This comparison table reviews conveyancing management software options including cosmoLex, Actionstep, Clio Manage, Karbon, and PracticeEvolve alongside other commonly used platforms. It contrasts core workflow features, matter and document management capabilities, automation and reporting depth, and the practical differences that affect legal operations across firms.
| # | Tool | Category | Overall | Features | Ease of Use | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | cosmoLex Legal practice management centralizes case management, billing, trust accounting, and document management for conveyancing teams. | all-in-one legal practice | 8.8/10 | 9.0/10 | 8.4/10 | 8.8/10 |
| 2 | Actionstep Configurable case management automates conveyancing matter workflows, tasks, and document processes. | configurable case management | 8.3/10 | 8.6/10 | 8.0/10 | 8.1/10 |
| 3 | Clio Manage Legal case management tracks conveyancing matters with tasks, documents, calendaring, and client communications. | cloud legal case management | 8.0/10 | 8.4/10 | 7.8/10 | 7.7/10 |
| 4 | Karbon Intake, workflow, and practice management tools support conveyancing document organization and matter progress tracking. | legal workflow management | 8.1/10 | 8.4/10 | 8.2/10 | 7.6/10 |
| 5 | PracticeEvolve Cloud practice management coordinates case stages, tasks, and document workflows for conveyancing practices. | practice management | 7.3/10 | 7.6/10 | 7.4/10 | 6.9/10 |
| 6 | Tidmarsh Conveyancing case handling and workflow automation manage property transactions, documentation, and follow-ups. | conveyancing workflows | 7.4/10 | 7.8/10 | 7.3/10 | 7.0/10 |
| 7 | CosmoLex Trust Accounting Trust accounting and compliance workflows for legal firms are integrated with case management used for conveyancing. | trust accounting | 7.5/10 | 8.0/10 | 6.8/10 | 7.4/10 |
| 8 | Zendesk Customer support workflows support conveyancing communications with ticketing, automation, and knowledge management. | communication workflow | 7.3/10 | 7.0/10 | 8.0/10 | 6.9/10 |
Legal practice management centralizes case management, billing, trust accounting, and document management for conveyancing teams.
Configurable case management automates conveyancing matter workflows, tasks, and document processes.
Legal case management tracks conveyancing matters with tasks, documents, calendaring, and client communications.
Intake, workflow, and practice management tools support conveyancing document organization and matter progress tracking.
Cloud practice management coordinates case stages, tasks, and document workflows for conveyancing practices.
Conveyancing case handling and workflow automation manage property transactions, documentation, and follow-ups.
Trust accounting and compliance workflows for legal firms are integrated with case management used for conveyancing.
Customer support workflows support conveyancing communications with ticketing, automation, and knowledge management.
cosmoLex
all-in-one legal practiceLegal practice management centralizes case management, billing, trust accounting, and document management for conveyancing teams.
Integrated trust accounting and compliance reporting connected directly to matter records
cosmoLex stands out for its conveyancing-centric case management paired with built-in compliance features for attorney trust accounting workflows. The system supports matter intake, document and form handling, task tracking, deadlines, and email-driven communications within a centralized case file. It also includes audit-ready reporting and structured data entry aimed at keeping case records consistent across the lifecycle of a transaction. Automation centers on repeatable workflows for files, correspondence, and compliance checkpoints rather than generic CRM-style lead management.
Pros
- Built-in trust accounting and compliance reporting tied to each matter
- Strong tasking, deadlines, and centralized file organization per transaction
- Workflow automation for repeatable conveyancing steps and document movement
- Audit-ready audit trails for key actions and matter activity
- Document handling and templates support consistent submissions and correspondence
Cons
- Best fit for law-firm processes, not generic business document management
- Advanced compliance workflows can add configuration complexity
- Interface breadth feels heavier than simple case-tracking tools
- Limited conveyancing-specific integrations compared with niche platforms
- Reporting requires structured data entry to stay consistently accurate
Best For
Conveyancing-focused firms needing case management plus trust-compliance workflow support
More related reading
Actionstep
configurable case managementConfigurable case management automates conveyancing matter workflows, tasks, and document processes.
Visual workflow builder for automating conveyancing matter stages, tasks, and triggers
Actionstep stands out with its no-code workflow automation that maps legal processes into configurable case stages and task assignments. Conveyancing teams can run matter management, documents, deadlines, client communications, and activity tracking in one system for audit-friendly case visibility. The platform also supports role-based access controls and template-driven work to standardize repetitive steps across files. Automation and reporting help reduce manual chasing of tasks and improve handover consistency between fee earners and support staff.
Pros
- Configurable case workflows automate conveyancing steps without engineering work
- Built-in document management supports matter-linked organization and retrieval
- Deadline and task tracking keeps file progress visible across stakeholders
- Templates and standardized forms reduce variation in routine conveyancing tasks
- Role-based permissions support controlled access for teams and support staff
Cons
- Initial workflow setup can be time-consuming for complex conveyancing models
- Reporting customization can require deeper admin configuration than basic users expect
- Bulk changes across many matters can feel slower than spreadsheets
Best For
Conveyancing teams needing configurable workflows, document control, and deadline tracking
Clio Manage
cloud legal case managementLegal case management tracks conveyancing matters with tasks, documents, calendaring, and client communications.
Matter-centered timeline that logs tasks, deadlines, and communication in one view
Clio Manage stands out for pairing matter management with client and team collaboration inside one system. It supports intake, tasks, documents, deadlines, and communication tracking tied to each client matter. Built-in reporting and search help teams monitor workload and find key information quickly. Conveyancing teams also benefit from integrations that connect emails, templates, and workflows with other legal tools.
Pros
- Centralized matter records for deadlines, tasks, and communication history
- Strong document management with versioning and matter-linked organization
- Reporting tools support workload visibility and process accountability
Cons
- Conveyancing-specific workflows require setup rather than turnkey templates
- Automation capabilities can feel limited for highly bespoke case journeys
- Document handling depends on disciplined naming and folder conventions
Best For
Conveyancing teams managing multiple active matters with structured tasks
More related reading
Karbon
legal workflow managementIntake, workflow, and practice management tools support conveyancing document organization and matter progress tracking.
Matter workflow automation that ties tasks, stages, and deadlines to each case
Karbon stands out with a strong practice-wide workflow engine that links matter tasks, contacts, and document requests in one place. It supports conveyancing-specific processes such as case tracking, deadline management, and team task allocation across multiple matters. The system emphasizes collaboration through roles, internal comments, and audit-friendly activity trails that help teams coordinate on time-sensitive exchanges. Reporting and dashboard views support pipeline visibility, which helps conveyancing teams manage workload and handoffs across stages.
Pros
- Configurable workflow tasks help standardize conveyancing handoffs across teams
- Matter-centric records connect contacts, tasks, and communication in one work area
- Deadline and stage visibility improves coordination during time-sensitive exchanges
- Role-based collaboration supports consistent ownership of case actions
- Activity history supports audit-ready tracking of matter changes
Cons
- Deep conveyancing automation often requires careful workflow setup
- Some advanced reporting needs tuning to match unique case stages
- Document handling depends on external integrations for full end-to-end control
Best For
Conveyancing teams needing task automation and matter tracking across multiple cases
PracticeEvolve
practice managementCloud practice management coordinates case stages, tasks, and document workflows for conveyancing practices.
Stage-driven matter workflow that links tasks and document activity to case status
PracticeEvolve focuses on conveyancing workflow management with document-centric case handling and task orchestration. It supports intake, case progression, and communications tied to matter stages so teams can run file work without stitching multiple systems. The solution emphasizes visibility into what is due next and which step each case is in, which fits busy residential conveyancing pipelines. Integrations and custom automation depend on the setup used by each practice and can limit how far workflows can be tailored.
Pros
- Stage-based case progression keeps conveyancing tasks aligned to each workflow step
- Document handling supports running files with fewer spreadsheets and ad hoc folders
- Matter visibility highlights due work so teams can triage quickly
Cons
- Limited evidence of deep conveyancing-specific integrations can force manual steps
- Advanced customization may require process changes that slow initial rollout
- Reporting depth can feel basic for firms needing audit-grade dashboards
Best For
Conveyancing teams managing multiple files with structured stages and document workflows
More related reading
Tidmarsh
conveyancing workflowsConveyancing case handling and workflow automation manage property transactions, documentation, and follow-ups.
Status-driven matter workflow that keeps tasks synchronized with conveyancing stage changes
Tidmarsh focuses on case management for conveyancing teams with a practical end-to-end workflow from instruction intake through completion. Core modules cover matter records, document generation and central storage, and task tracking tied to status changes. The system is designed to support collaborative progression across fee earners, with audit-friendly activity visibility and templated communications. Overall, it targets operational control rather than deep integrations for every legal and back-office system.
Pros
- Matter-centric workflow with clear status-driven task progression
- Document handling built around reusable templates for conveyancing outputs
- Activity tracking supports traceability across fee earner actions
Cons
- Automation depth is limited compared with more configurable workflow platforms
- Integration options appear narrower for niche conveyancing tech stacks
- Reporting and dashboards are less flexible than advanced BI-style tools
Best For
Conveyancing firms needing structured case workflows and template-driven document production
CosmoLex Trust Accounting
trust accountingTrust accounting and compliance workflows for legal firms are integrated with case management used for conveyancing.
Trust ledger reconciliation with auditable entries per client and matter
CosmoLex Trust Accounting stands out by treating conveyancing workflows as a trust-accounting process with built-in audit trails. It supports client and matter tracking, trust and operating fund segregation, and document-centric recordkeeping tied to transactions. Core capabilities include ledger-based reconciliation, trust disbursement handling, and reporting that supports compliance-focused record retention. For conveyancing teams that need more than task lists, it combines matter organization with financial controls in one system.
Pros
- Built-in trust accounting model tied to client matters
- Ledger-driven reconciliation helps maintain auditable fund balances
- Structured reporting supports compliance-oriented recordkeeping
- Matter tracking keeps client, transaction, and documentation linked
Cons
- Conveyancing workflow automation depends on disciplined data entry
- Trust and ledger screens can feel heavy for task-focused users
- Less of a purpose-built deal-room than generic CRM-style tools
- Document handling is stronger for records than for guided matter steps
Best For
Conveyancing firms needing trust accounting controls inside matter management
More related reading
Zendesk
communication workflowCustomer support workflows support conveyancing communications with ticketing, automation, and knowledge management.
SLA policies combined with ticket triggers and automations
Zendesk stands out for its omnichannel customer support foundation paired with workflow tooling like triggers, automations, and ticket routing. It supports case management workflows through customizable ticket fields, SLA policies, and rich reporting across support volume, response times, and outcomes. For conveyancing teams, it can centralize client and solicitor communications, track document requests as ticket tasks, and coordinate escalations when responses stall. However, it lacks conveyancing-specific workflow modules like contract exchange stages, client identity checks, and legal document templates that are purpose-built for property transactions.
Pros
- Omnichannel inbox merges email, chat, and messaging into one ticket stream
- SLA rules and escalation workflows enforce response and follow-up timelines
- Triggers and automations reduce manual routing and document-request chasing
- Reporting tracks workload, first response time, and resolution outcomes
- Robust integrations connect with document and CRM tools via APIs
Cons
- No built-in conveyancing stages or legal workflow states like exchange and completion
- Document handling requires add-ons or custom processes beyond ticket notes
- Complex multi-step workflows need configuration work and disciplined ticket design
- Audit-grade legal record structure is weaker than practice management systems
- Role-based approvals for legal sign-off are not conveyancing-native
Best For
Customer-service-led conveyancing teams needing ticket-based case coordination
How to Choose the Right Conveyancing Management Software
This buyer’s guide explains how to evaluate conveyancing management software using concrete, conveyancing-specific capabilities found across cosmoLex, Actionstep, Clio Manage, Karbon, PracticeEvolve, Tidmarsh, CosmoLex Trust Accounting, and Zendesk. It covers what the software does, which features matter most, which firms benefit most from each tool, and the common mistakes that slow rollouts. The guide also includes the selection methodology used to compare all tools in this set.
What Is Conveyancing Management Software?
Conveyancing management software centralizes conveyancing case handling so teams can run matters with tasks, deadlines, documents, and client communications in one workflow. It reduces missed steps by tying status changes or stages to work items, like the status-driven task synchronization in Tidmarsh and the stage-driven work visibility in PracticeEvolve. It also supports compliance needs when tools connect records to regulated workflows, like cosmoLex’s integrated trust accounting and compliance reporting connected to matter records. Typical users include conveyancing law firms that need audit-ready matter activity and repeatable transaction steps across multiple active files, including teams running structured task pipelines in Clio Manage and Karbon.
Key Features to Look For
These features determine whether conveyancing work stays organized and auditable while the team runs real transaction stages and repeatable document steps.
Matter-linked workflow with stage and status triggers
Workflows should move tasks when a conveyancing stage changes so the due work stays aligned to the file, like the status-driven task progression in Tidmarsh. PracticeEvolve and Karbon both link due work to case progress so teams can see what is next across multiple matters without spreadsheet tracking.
Configurable no-code automation for conveyancing steps
Teams with repeatable but custom conveyancing journeys need automation that can be modeled without engineering, like Actionstep’s visual workflow builder for conveyancing matter stages, tasks, and triggers. Karbon’s practice-wide workflow engine also ties tasks, stages, and deadlines to each case, which helps standardize handoffs across fee earners and support staff.
Document management tied to each matter record
Conveyancing teams need matter-linked document organization so templates, forms, and submissions stay discoverable during handover, like the versioned, matter-linked document management in Clio Manage. cosmoLex also supports document handling with templates and consistent correspondence tied to each centralized case file.
Deadline and task tracking with audit-friendly activity trails
Task tracking must surface what is due and who owns it, like the deadline and task tracking in Actionstep and Karbon. Audit-ready traceability matters for compliance and internal accountability, and both Karbon and Tidmarsh emphasize activity history tied to matter changes.
Trust accounting and compliance workflows connected to matters
Firms that need ledger-level controls should prioritize cosmoLex and CosmoLex Trust Accounting, which both provide trust accounting model support tied to client matters. cosmoLex’s integrated trust accounting and compliance reporting connected directly to matter records improves compliance readiness compared with tools that primarily handle tasks and communications, like Zendesk.
Client communication visibility centered on matters
Centralizing communication history prevents lost context during exchanges and completion steps, like Clio Manage’s communication tracking tied to each client matter. Zendesk can support client communications through an omnichannel ticket stream and SLA escalation workflows, but it does not provide conveyancing-native legal workflow states like exchange and completion.
How to Choose the Right Conveyancing Management Software
The right choice matches the tool’s workflow engine, compliance depth, and document handling to the way the conveyancing practice actually runs cases.
Map conveyancing stages to workflow states and verify task synchronization
Write out the actual stages used for residential conveyancing and check whether the software moves tasks when stage or status changes. Tidmarsh keeps tasks synchronized with conveyancing stage changes, and PracticeEvolve links tasks and document activity to case status for due-work visibility. For configurable stage models, Actionstep’s visual workflow builder and Karbon’s practice-wide workflow engine both support automation triggers based on defined stages and tasks.
Confirm matter-centered document handling and template support
Validate that documents attach to the matter record so the team retrieves the right version during handover. Clio Manage provides strong document management with versioning and matter-linked organization, while cosmoLex supports document handling and templates to standardize submissions and correspondence. If document control depends on naming conventions or external file discipline, the system will slow case work, which is why Clio Manage’s built-in matter-linked structure is a key differentiator.
Assess compliance and trust accounting requirements before choosing a tool
Firms that require trust accounting controls should shortlist cosmoLex and CosmoLex Trust Accounting because both include trust accounting workflows tied to client matters. cosmoLex adds audit-ready compliance reporting connected directly to matter records and ledger-driven reconciliation with auditable entries. Tools focused on case coordination, like Zendesk, support SLA-driven communication but do not provide trust ledger reconciliation for regulated fund handling.
Plan for workflow setup effort based on configuration complexity
Complex conveyancing workflows often require meaningful setup time, especially with configurable automation tools like Actionstep and Karbon. Actionstep’s no-code workflow automation can reduce manual chasing once configured, but complex workflow setup can take time. Karbon and Clio Manage also rely on structured setup for conveyancing-specific workflows, so internal owners should be assigned to model stages and task rules.
Choose the collaboration model that fits the team’s operating style
If the firm runs cases with fee earner coordination and audit-friendly activity history, Karbon and Tidmarsh provide role-based collaboration and activity tracking tied to matter changes. If the firm runs coordination through support-style communication channels, Zendesk can centralize client communications using SLA rules, ticket triggers, and automations. If the firm needs a matter-centered view of tasks, deadlines, and communication in one timeline, Clio Manage’s matter-centered timeline supports fast context switching across active matters.
Who Needs Conveyancing Management Software?
Conveyancing management software fits firms that must run repeatable property transactions with stage-based work, document control, and audit-ready case records.
Conveyancing-focused firms that need trust accounting and compliance connected to matters
cosmoLex is the best fit because it ties integrated trust accounting and compliance reporting directly to matter records. CosmoLex Trust Accounting is also suited for teams that prioritize ledger-based reconciliation with auditable fund entries per client and matter.
Teams that want configurable automation for conveyancing stages without engineering work
Actionstep is built for configurable case workflows with a visual workflow builder that automates conveyancing matter stages, tasks, and triggers. Karbon also supports practice-wide workflow automation that ties tasks, stages, and deadlines to each case for standardized handoffs.
Conveyancing practices managing multiple active matters with structured tasks and a matter timeline
Clio Manage matches teams that need a centralized matter record with tasks, documents, deadlines, and communication history. Its matter-centered timeline supports a single view that logs tasks, deadlines, and communication together for fast workload management.
Customer-service-led conveyancing teams coordinating client contact through escalations
Zendesk fits teams that run client communications as a ticket workflow with omnichannel messaging and SLA escalation workflows. It centralizes communications and automates routing and follow-up, but it lacks conveyancing-native legal workflow states like exchange and completion.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Several repeatable pitfalls show up when conveyancing teams buy case tools without aligning them to stages, compliance workflows, and document discipline.
Buying a general communication or ticket tool for legal conveyancing stages
Zendesk centralizes client communications through ticketing, triggers, automations, and SLA policies, but it does not include conveyancing stages like exchange and completion. Conveyancing teams that require legal workflow states and stage-linked work should prioritize Tidmarsh, PracticeEvolve, Karbon, or Actionstep instead.
Choosing a task tracker when trust accounting and ledger controls are required
Tools that focus on activity tracking without ledger reconciliation are not designed for auditable fund handling. cosmoLex and CosmoLex Trust Accounting provide trust ledger reconciliation with auditable entries per client and matter, which is the compliance posture needed for trust workflows.
Underestimating the setup effort for complex workflow automation
Actionstep and Karbon both support automation that reduces manual chasing once configured, but initial workflow setup can be time-consuming for complex conveyancing models. Clio Manage can also require setup for conveyancing-specific workflows, so workflow modeling should be planned before migration.
Relying on document organization that depends on naming conventions alone
Clio Manage’s document handling depends on disciplined naming and folder conventions, so document retrieval can degrade if conventions are inconsistent. cosmoLex and Tidmarsh place more emphasis on structured matter organization and templated outputs, which reduces the risk of lost or duplicated document versions.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
we evaluated every tool on three sub-dimensions. The features sub-dimension carries weight 0.4. Ease of use carries weight 0.3. Value carries weight 0.3. The overall rating is the weighted average computed as overall = 0.40 × features + 0.30 × ease of use + 0.30 × value. cosmoLex separated from lower-ranked tools with its integrated trust accounting and compliance reporting connected directly to matter records, which strengthened the features score and improved end-to-end conveyancing compliance readiness beyond task management and document organization.
Frequently Asked Questions About Conveyancing Management Software
Which conveyancing management tools provide the most audit-ready workflow history for client matters?
cosmoLex is built around audit-ready reporting and structured matter records with repeatable compliance checkpoints. Karbon also emphasizes audit-friendly activity trails that log task actions and status-linked updates across matters.
What tool best fits a conveyancing firm that needs trust accounting controls tied to case records?
CosmoLex Trust Accounting treats conveyancing workflows as a trust-accounting process with ledger-based reconciliation and auditable entries per client and matter. This approach connects transaction recordkeeping and disbursement handling to matter organization, rather than keeping finance separate.
Which platform supports configurable conveyancing workflows without custom coding?
Actionstep provides a no-code workflow builder that maps legal process stages into configurable task assignments. Teams can standardize repetitive conveyancing steps with template-driven work and role-based access controls.
What option is strongest for tracking what is due next across many active conveyancing files?
PracticeEvolve uses stage-driven matter workflows that keep visibility aligned to case status and the next due step. Tidmarsh similarly synchronizes tasks with status changes from instruction intake through completion to reduce missed handoffs.
Which tool offers a matter-centered timeline that combines tasks, deadlines, and communication history in one view?
Clio Manage is known for a matter-centered timeline that logs tasks, deadlines, and communication tied to each client matter. This reduces the need to cross-reference activity logs stored in separate systems.
Which conveyancing tools are designed to manage document production and centralized document storage as part of the case workflow?
Tidmarsh includes document generation with central storage and keeps tasks tied to status changes in the same workflow. PracticeEvolve also links document activity to stage progression so teams can run file work without stitching systems together.
Which platform helps teams automate internal coordination across multiple matters using a workflow engine?
Karbon ties tasks, stages, and document requests to each case while coordinating team work through roles and internal comments. Actionstep complements this with triggers that assign work based on configurable stages and activity signals.
Which option is best suited for teams that want centralized client communications and escalations using ticket workflows and SLAs?
Zendesk fits customer-service-led conveyancing coordination by combining omnichannel support tooling with ticket routing, SLA policies, and automations. It can centralize client and solicitor communication and track document requests as ticket tasks, but it lacks conveyancing-specific stages like contract exchange templates.
What are common workflow gaps when using a general support ticketing system for property transactions?
Zendesk supports configurable ticket fields and SLA-driven escalation, but it does not include conveyancing-specific workflow modules such as contract exchange stages or purpose-built legal templates for property transactions. Conveyancing-focused case systems like Actionstep and PracticeEvolve map those stages directly to tasks and case status.
Conclusion
After evaluating 8 legal professional services, cosmoLex stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
Tools reviewed
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Legal Professional Services alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of legal professional services tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare legal professional services tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.