GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Environment EnergyTop 10 Best Commercial Energy Management Software of 2026
Ranking roundup of commercial energy management software with a top 10 list, criteria, and tradeoffs for facilities teams, including EnergyCAP.
How we ranked these tools
Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.
Search agents gather the source set and the review record, including transcriptions of video reviews and podcasts.
Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Schneider Electric Resource Advisor is the best fit for large facilities that need repeatable, risk-aware procurement and interval reporting across many sites, whereas Energy Elephant works well for governed multi-meter workflows with API-driven reporting, and if you want a lower-cost entry for bill-plus-carbon oversight, EnergyCAP is the one to consider.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Schneider Electric Resource Advisor
Portfolio hierarchy controls drive consistent interval-based insights and reporting views across sites.
Best for: Fits when facilities teams must standardize interval-meter analytics across many sites with repeatable reporting.
Energy Elephant
Editor pickRole-based governance for interval analytics, combined with an API that supports custom data extraction.
Best for: Fits when facilities teams need governed interval workflows and API-driven reporting across many meters.
EnergyCAP
Editor pickConfigurable savings and measurement workflows that tie meter and bill inputs to project outcomes.
Best for: Fits when facilities teams need portfolio bill and interval reporting plus savings tracking across many sites.
Comparison Table
Schneider Electric Resource Advisor
enterpriseResource Advisor provides energy procurement, utility data, sustainability, and risk management for large organizations.
Portfolio hierarchy controls drive consistent interval-based insights and reporting views across sites.
Resource Advisor is built for energy teams that need portfolio-level visibility with consistent calculations across sites. It processes interval usage, meter metadata, and site structure to support operational benchmarking outputs and recurring performance reporting. Integration depth matters here because the system is designed to pull signals from building and meter data flows and then carry those signals through dashboards and exports.
A tradeoff is that achieving dependable automation outcomes depends on correct site mapping and meter configuration before analytics and reporting can align. Resource Advisor is most useful when interval data is already captured reliably and governance is in place to keep portfolio hierarchies and rate-related attributes consistent across locations.
- +Strong interval usage ingestion and site hierarchy modeling
- +Automations and export workflows support recurring reporting cycles
- +Portfolio views keep calculations consistent across multiple facilities
- +Integration focus supports building and utility data alignment
- –Meter and site mapping must be accurate to avoid analytics drift
- –Workflow customization can require specialist administration
- –Some advanced integrations depend on available connector coverage
- –Dashboard setup takes time for multi-team governance
Energy management analysts
Track demand-charge drivers by site
Faster charge attribution
Facilities operators
Trend performance against prior periods
Earlier anomaly detection
Show 2 more scenarios
Utility reporting coordinators
Standardize portfolio reporting exports
Consistent submissions
Configured exports convert interval data and metadata into shareable reports.
ESG and sustainability teams
Support emissions calculations from usage data
Reduced manual reconciliation
Usage-based reporting outputs feed carbon accounting workflows using aligned site context.
Best for: Fits when facilities teams must standardize interval-meter analytics across many sites with repeatable reporting.
Energy Elephant
SMBEnergy and sustainability management software targeting commercial property portfolios.
Role-based governance for interval analytics, combined with an API that supports custom data extraction.
Energy Elephant is positioned for facilities and energy managers who manage many meters and need consistent time-series outputs for operational review and billing support. The workflow centers on bringing interval meter data into a managed structure, then producing analytics and alerts tied to schedules. RBAC and audit-style traceability support multi-stakeholder teams, where engineering staff, analysts, and managers need different views of the same assets. Integration can extend beyond dashboards through an API, which helps teams route cleaned interval data into custom reports and internal tooling.
A key tradeoff is that deeper automation and data governance require upfront configuration for meter mapping, permissions, and reporting definitions. Energy Elephant works best when an energy team already has a reliable interval-data acquisition path and wants a repeatable process for normalization, trend review, and recurring measurement-style outputs for operations.
- +Interval data ingestion supports repeatable analytics across many meters
- +RBAC separates analyst workflows from management reporting access
- +API enables custom reporting and downstream integrations
- +Automated recurring outputs reduce manual month-end effort
- –Meter mapping and configuration take significant early setup time
- –Complex normalization logic may require analyst oversight
- –Some edge-case source formats need preprocessing before ingestion
- –Report customization can be slower than prebuilt templates
Energy analytics teams
Monthly interval reporting automation
Less manual reporting work
Facilities engineering teams
Asset-level diagnostics via time series
Faster anomaly triage
Show 2 more scenarios
Utility data coordinators
Normalize and validate meter feeds
Fewer data-quality issues
Controlled ingestion and governance help ensure consistent interval structure before analytics.
Software integrators
Push outputs to internal tools
Custom reporting without exports
API access supports custom dashboards and data pipelines tied to existing systems.
Best for: Fits when facilities teams need governed interval workflows and API-driven reporting across many meters.
EnergyCAP
enterpriseEnergyCAP centralizes utility billing, energy data, carbon reporting, and cost control for commercial portfolios.
Configurable savings and measurement workflows that tie meter and bill inputs to project outcomes.
EnergyCAP is designed for energy teams managing many facilities under separate utility accounts and rate structures, with reporting that maps consumption to cost. It combines utility bill import, interval data handling, and savings-oriented workflows that can be aligned to project cycles. Integration depth tends to focus on energy data acquisition and enrichment rather than deep building control, and teams typically evaluate it when they need consistent site-level governance across portfolios.
A key tradeoff is that EnergyCAP’s strongest value appears when sites use its established data and savings workflow patterns, which can mean extra configuration for custom reporting logic. It fits best when a facility group wants to normalize metered consumption and bills, then tie results to recurring review cycles for ECMs and M&V-style reporting.
- +Savings workflows connect utility data to project measurement cycles
- +Interval and bill data stay aligned for usage and cost reporting
- +Rules-based automation reduces recurring manual adjustments across sites
- +Portfolio governance supports multi-site rollups and standard reviews
- –Custom reports can require structured configuration to match workflows
- –Integration depth is stronger for energy data than for building controls
Energy managers
Unify bills and interval data
Faster monthly performance reviews
Sustainability teams
Track ECM impacts over time
Repeatable impact reporting
Show 1 more scenario
Portfolio analysts
Standardize multi-site governance
Fewer cross-site discrepancies
Configuration supports consistent rollups and review processes across accounts and facilities.
Best for: Fits when facilities teams need portfolio bill and interval reporting plus savings tracking across many sites.
KWh Analytics
API-firstEnergy data platform providing risk management and operational analytics for commercial energy assets.
Demand-charge analysis built directly from interval meter timelines and tariff structures for repeatable month-end outputs.
KWh Analytics is commercial energy management software that focuses on turning interval meter data into actionable billing, demand, and performance views. It emphasizes automated data ingestion from metering sources and recurring calculations for demand charges and load-driven KPIs.
- +Interval data ingestion supports repeatable demand and cost calculations
- +Recurring KPI and report generation reduces manual spreadsheet work
- +Portfolio-level normalization helps keep metrics comparable across sites
- +Access control options limit who can view energy and billing outputs
- –BAS and SCADA integrations are limited compared with broader control platforms
- –Advanced automation depends on consistent metering and tariff configuration
Best for: Fits when facilities teams need interval-driven demand charge and KPI workflows across multiple meters.
EnerNOC Procurement
enterpriseCloud-based energy intelligence platform for commercial and industrial enterprises managing procurement and efficiency.
Procurement workflow automation that manages utility contract execution details tied to interval-driven performance reporting.
EnerNOC Procurement focuses on automating utility procurement workflows, including tariff and contract management, to reduce manual effort in energy buying and rate compliance. It supports interval meter data handling for decisioning tied to pricing structures and performance tracking. The product also emphasizes cross-utility contract execution and operational reporting that energy teams can run as ongoing processes.
- +Workflow automation for utility procurement tasks and contract tracking
- +Interval data support used for performance monitoring against procurement goals
- +Operational reporting designed around procurement and rate constraints
- +Process controls for multi-site procurement governance
- –Requires strong internal process ownership to keep procurement data current
- –Integration depth depends on external systems and data exchange design
- –Usability can feel administrative when setting up site and account mappings
- –Limited coverage for real-time building controls compared with BEMS-focused tools
Best for: Fits when energy teams need procurement automation and contract operations across multiple accounts.
GridPoint
vertical specialistGridPoint combines commercial building energy monitoring, controls, and equipment optimization.
Measurement and verification style baselining tied to ongoing performance review at the site level.
GridPoint targets energy and sustainability teams that need interval-meter data workflows tied to operations and financial outcomes. The product centers on utility data ingestion, site-level analytics, and energy optimization use cases across portfolios and single facilities.
- +Interval-meter driven analytics mapped to site baselines and ongoing tracking
- +Multi-site configuration support for standardizing workflows across facilities
- +Measurement and verification style reporting for project performance review
- +Extensive utility data handling workflows for ongoing portfolio operations
- –Integration projects can require engineering time for best results
- –Deeper automation depends on external system connectivity and process design
- –User workflows can feel complex when managing many meters and sites
- –Some operational actions require additional configuration beyond dashboards
Best for: Fits when facilities teams need interval-informed baselines plus M&V-style tracking across multiple sites.
EnergyPrint
SMBEnergy benchmarking and reporting tool for commercial real estate portfolios.
API-driven data ingestion and reconciliation workflows that keep meter-to-site mappings consistent for portfolio reporting.
EnergyPrint focuses on utility bill and interval-meter data workflows for facility teams that need recurring analysis across portfolios. The core capabilities center on uploading and normalizing metered usage, organizing accounts and sites, and producing actionable reports for energy benchmarking and operational review.
- +Interval data uploads map cleanly to sites and reporting periods
- +Automation options reduce spreadsheet-based reconciliation for recurring reporting
- +Portfolio reporting supports consistent analysis across many accounts
- +Role-based access controls support multi-team data separation
- –Complex integrations still require careful meter mapping and data validation
- –Some advanced measurement and verification workflows need extra configuration
- –Demand response and load control automation coverage is limited versus full DERMS tools
- –Custom analytics often depend on API or export workflows rather than UI builders
Best for: Fits when multi-site facilities need repeatable bill and interval-data reporting with controlled access.
Eniscope
enterpriseReal-time energy monitoring hardware and software platform for commercial buildings.
Configurable energy data pipelines that normalize incoming interval meter data into consistent reporting-ready series.
Eniscope is a commercial energy management system built for facilities teams that need interval meter data workflows, billing analysis, and performance tracking in one place. It focuses on configurable energy data acquisition, normalization, and reporting pipelines so teams can compare sites over time and reconcile usage against operational context.
- +Configurable interval data import workflows reduce manual data wrangling
- +Site and asset performance reporting supports trend analysis across periods
- +Role-based access helps contain data exposure across operational groups
- +Automation hooks for scheduled data refresh support higher data throughput
- –Advanced demand charge and pricing logic requires careful configuration
- –Deeper BAS and SCADA integration breadth depends on project setup scope
- –Some dataset normalization steps need ongoing data quality checks
- –Modeling complex tariff exceptions can take additional analyst effort
Best for: Fits when facilities teams need controlled interval-meter workflows plus configurable reporting for multiple sites.
IBM Envizi
enterpriseIBM Envizi manages energy, emissions, sustainability data, and reporting across enterprise operations.
Envizi’s governed energy and carbon workflow model ties normalized metering inputs to standardized baselines and portfolio reporting.
IBM Envizi ingests utility interval meter data and normalizes it for reporting, baseline work, and performance analytics. The product focuses on energy and carbon workflows tied to an enterprise energy data model that supports multi-site rollups.
- +Normalization pipeline turns interval meter reads into consistent, comparable reporting outputs
- +Enterprise rollups support portfolio comparisons across sites and asset groups
- +Governance includes RBAC and change history for data and workflow actions
- +Integration patterns map utility and account structures into shared energy views
- –Initial data mapping and onboarding require structured master data and QA cycles
- –Some automation depends on integration configuration rather than out-of-the-box meter types
- –Workflow customization can be configuration-heavy for highly specific reporting needs
- –Advanced analytics coverage varies by data readiness and configured baselines
Best for: Fits when enterprise energy teams need normalized interval data, carbon-capable reporting, and governed multi-site workflows.
Siemens Building X Energy Manager
enterpriseBuilding X Energy Manager provides energy monitoring, analytics, and optimization for building portfolios.
Action-oriented energy measure workflows that track tasks and results against interval-meter baselines inside the Building X environment.
Siemens Building X Energy Manager targets facilities teams that need centralized energy data intake from building systems plus action tracking for conservation measures. It focuses on integration with Siemens building and metering ecosystems, including automated meter reading workflows and interval-meter handling for energy baselines and reporting.
- +Strong integration fit with Siemens building infrastructure and metering workflows
- +Interval data support supports baseline reporting and weather normalization
- +Measure workflows keep conservation actions tied to measured outcomes
- +Site and asset scoping supports governance across portfolios
- –Deeper configuration and onboarding are required before integrations run reliably
- –Cross-vendor BAS integration breadth can be narrower than general-purpose EMIS
- –Advanced analytics depend on data quality from upstream meters and interfaces
- –Automation changes require more system coordination than standalone dashboards
Best for: Fits when facilities teams standardize on Siemens systems and need governed energy monitoring with automated data flows.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 commercial energy management software, Schneider Electric Resource Advisor stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Commercial Energy Management Software
This buyer’s guide covers commercial energy management software used for interval-meter analytics, multi-site reporting, and workflow-driven operations across facilities and energy teams. The covered tools include Schneider Electric Resource Advisor, Energy Elephant, EnergyCAP, KWh Analytics, EnerNOC Procurement, GridPoint, EnergyPrint, Eniscope, IBM Envizi, and Siemens Building X Energy Manager.
After the individual tool reviews, this section frames how teams should compare integration depth, automation and API surface, and governance controls that affect interval ingestion, site hierarchy mapping, and recurring reporting.
Schneider Electric Resource Advisor is highlighted for portfolio hierarchy controls that standardize interval-based reporting views. Energy Elephant is highlighted for governed interval workflows that pair RBAC with an API for custom extraction.
Commercial Energy Management Software for interval-meter analytics, governed reporting, and automation
Commercial energy management software centralizes interval meter ingestion, normalizes usage series for consistent comparison, and drives reporting workflows that stay consistent across sites. Tools such as Schneider Electric Resource Advisor emphasize repeatable interval usage insights by using portfolio hierarchy controls that shape reporting views across multiple sites.
Many deployments also require automation and governed access for analysts versus management reporting use cases. Energy Elephant focuses on role-based governance for interval analytics and pairs that control layer with an API that supports custom data extraction and recurring report outputs.
Integration, data mapping, automation, and governance for interval-meter workflows
Commercial energy management software has to move interval meter data into a repeatable site model so interval analytics and reporting views do not drift from month to month. The comparison below focuses on integration depth, automation and API surface, and governance controls that determine whether teams can run recurring reporting without manual reconciliation.
Portfolio hierarchy controls for consistent multi-site reporting views
Schneider Electric Resource Advisor provides portfolio hierarchy controls that standardize interval-based insights and reporting views across sites, so teams can keep the same rollups across recurring cycles. GridPoint also supports multi-site configuration, but it centers on baseline tracking tied to site performance review.
RBAC and governed interval analytics with an API for extraction
Energy Elephant combines role-based governance for interval analytics with an API that supports custom data extraction for recurring reporting needs. IBM Envizi uses a governed workflow model that ties normalized metering inputs to standardized baselines and portfolio reporting.
Savings and measurement workflows that tie interval and bill inputs to outcomes
EnergyCAP uses configurable savings and measurement workflows that connect utility data to project measurement cycles while keeping interval and bill data aligned for usage and cost reporting. KWh Analytics focuses on demand-charge analysis built directly from interval meter timelines and tariff structures for repeatable month-end outputs.
Measurement and verification style baselining that stays aligned to interval updates
GridPoint drives M&V-style baselining tied to ongoing performance review at the site level using interval-meter driven analytics mapped to site baselines. EnergyCAP also aligns interval and bill inputs for usage and cost reporting, but it emphasizes project measurement cycles over baseline tracking continuity.
API-driven ingestion and reconciliation that preserves meter-to-site mapping consistency
EnergyPrint offers API-driven data ingestion and reconciliation workflows that keep meter-to-site mappings consistent for portfolio reporting. Eniscope focuses on configurable energy data pipelines that normalize incoming interval meter data into reporting-ready series, but it requires careful configuration for advanced pricing logic.
Automation coverage for recurring reporting and cross-system operations
Schneider Electric Resource Advisor supports automations and export workflows that power recurring reporting cycles once meter and site mapping is accurate. EnerNOC Procurement emphasizes procurement workflow automation that links utility contract operations to interval-driven performance reporting, so operational teams can track contract details tied to energy results.
A decision framework for mapping interval data, enforcing governance, and automating reporting
Start with the workflow shape and then validate that the integration and governance model match it, because interval ingestion and reporting outputs depend on how meter-to-site mapping is modeled and maintained. The steps below branch into two different product philosophies: portfolio hierarchy standardization versus governed interval workflows, followed by an automation and integration check tied to the recurring reporting cadence.
Choose the standardization mechanism for multi-site rollups
If the reporting problem is consistent rollups across many sites, Schneider Electric Resource Advisor uses portfolio hierarchy controls to drive consistent interval-based insights and reporting views. If the goal is governed interval workflow execution with controlled access for analysts, Energy Elephant uses RBAC plus an API for custom extraction.
Pick the workflow anchor: demand charges, savings cycles, or procurement operations
For repeatable month-end demand-charge and KPI outputs built from interval timelines and tariff structures, KWh Analytics provides demand-charge analysis workflows. For savings and measurement cycles that tie meter and bill inputs to project outcomes, EnergyCAP is built around configurable savings and measurement workflows.
Validate baseline tracking depth against ongoing interval updates
For M&V-style baselining that stays tied to ongoing performance review at the site level, GridPoint maps interval analytics to site baselines for tracking. For baseline and normalization that connects normalized metering inputs to standardized reporting and carbon-capable workflows, IBM Envizi focuses on its normalization pipeline and governed portfolio rollups.
Stress-test ingestion and mapping reconciliation before committing automation
For recurring reporting that depends on clean meter-to-site mapping, EnergyPrint provides API-driven ingestion and reconciliation workflows to keep those mappings consistent. For teams expecting configurable interval data import and reporting-ready series generation, Eniscope provides configurable pipelines but advanced demand charge and pricing logic requires careful configuration.
Confirm automation requirements match the integration reality of BAS and external systems
For broader automation and export cycles that depend on correct meter and site mapping, Schneider Electric Resource Advisor supports automations and export workflows but requires accurate mappings to avoid analytics drift. For procurement-centric automation tied to interval-driven performance monitoring, EnerNOC Procurement requires internal process ownership to keep procurement data current and depends on integration design for external data exchange.
Who benefits from interval-meter analytics with governance and automation
Teams that operate across multiple sites need an interval-meter model that can be standardized, governed, and automated so recurring reporting stays consistent. The right fit depends on whether the organization needs hierarchy standardization, governed analyst access, or workflow-specific automation tied to savings, demand charges, or procurement operations.
Facilities teams standardizing interval analytics across many sites
Schneider Electric Resource Advisor fits when repeatable interval-meter analytics and reporting views must stay consistent via portfolio hierarchy controls across multiple sites.
Energy analysts and managers needing governed access with API-driven extraction
Energy Elephant fits when RBAC must separate analyst interval workflows from management reporting access while the API supports custom data extraction.
Portfolio teams running savings and measurement workflows with utility data
EnergyCAP fits when utility bill and interval inputs must stay aligned for usage and cost reporting while configurable savings and measurement workflows tie outcomes to project measurement cycles.
Energy teams that must produce demand-charge KPIs from tariffs and interval timelines
KWh Analytics fits when demand-charge analysis and tariff-driven month-end outputs must be generated repeatedly from interval meter timelines.
Enterprise energy organizations that need normalization plus carbon-capable governed reporting
IBM Envizi fits when normalized interval data must feed standardized baselines and governed multi-site workflows with enterprise rollups for portfolio comparisons.
Common pitfalls when selecting Commercial Energy Management Software
Misalignment between meter-to-site mapping practices and the software’s governance model causes inconsistent interval reporting, even when interval ingestion works. Selection errors usually appear as setup-heavy mapping work, thin integration expectations for building control systems, or workflow configurations that do not match how teams run recurring cycles.
Assuming reporting consistency without validating meter and site mapping governance
Schneider Electric Resource Advisor can produce consistent portfolio reporting only when meter and site mapping stays accurate to prevent analytics drift. EnergyPrint also depends on careful meter mapping and data validation even with API-driven reconciliation.
Underestimating early configuration time for normalization and mapping logic
Energy Elephant requires significant early setup time for meter mapping and configuration, and complex normalization logic may require analyst oversight. Eniscope reduces manual wrangling with configurable interval data import, but advanced demand charge and pricing logic still requires careful configuration.
Treating BAS and SCADA integration breadth as an assumed baseline requirement
KWh Analytics has limited BAS and SCADA integration compared with broader control platforms, which can break workflows that need direct building control context. Siemens Building X Energy Manager fits best when standardization stays within Siemens building infrastructure, since cross-vendor BAS integration breadth can be narrower.
Choosing a tool for interval analytics when the organization needs procurement execution automation
EnerNOC Procurement supports procurement workflow automation and utility contract tracking, but it requires internal process ownership to keep procurement data current. EnergyCAP focuses on savings and measurement workflows, so contract execution workflows require additional operational alignment.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Schneider Electric Resource Advisor, Energy Elephant, EnergyCAP, KWh Analytics, EnerNOC Procurement, GridPoint, EnergyPrint, Eniscope, IBM Envizi, and Siemens Building X Energy Manager on feature coverage for interval-meter analytics and recurring reporting workflows, along with ease of setup for multi-site mapping and onboarding. Features counted for 40% of the score, and ease and value each counted for 30% to reflect how quickly teams can reach reliable interval-driven outputs.
Schneider Electric Resource Advisor ranked highest because portfolio hierarchy controls drive consistent interval-based insights and reporting views across sites, and because automations and export workflows support recurring reporting cycles once mappings are correct. Ease scored strongly as a result of the repeatable hierarchy-driven reporting approach, while value held up because the workflow supports standardized views rather than requiring analyst-heavy customization for each site.
Frequently Asked Questions About Commercial Energy Management Software
How does Schneider Electric Resource Advisor handle interval-meter data across multiple sites?
Which tools provide an API surface for pulling interval analytics into downstream systems?
What breaks if interval meter schemas and meter-to-site mappings stay inconsistent during onboarding?
When should EnergyCAP’s savings and measurement workflows be preferred over pure reporting automation?
How do admin controls and auditability differ across governed interval analytics tools?
Which products are designed to connect interval meter workflows to building system data sources?
What is the tradeoff between M&V-style baselining and tariff-driven month-end outputs?
How should teams approach migration of meter, account, and portfolio hierarchy data into IBM Envizi versus Resource Advisor?
When does EnerNOC Procurement fall short compared with interval analytics tools for facilities teams?
How do configuration-first pipelines differ from workflow-first savings processes in day-to-day operations?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Funding and competing interests
This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.
They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.
Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →
- Environment EnergyTop 10 Best Commercial Energy Audit Software of 2026
- Environment EnergyTop 10 Best Commercial Solar Design Software of 2026
- Environment EnergyTop 10 Best Commercial Waste Software of 2026
- Environment EnergyTop 10 Best Energy Trading And Risk Management Software of 2026
- Environment EnergyTop 10 Best Building Energy Efficiency Software of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Environment Energy alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of environment energy tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare environment energy tools→