GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Legal Professional ServicesTop 10 Best Cloud Law Firm Software of 2026
Compare the top 10 Cloud Law Firm Software picks with rankings and key features for Clio, MyCase, and PracticePanther. Explore options now.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Clio
Email integration that syncs messages to matters for searchable case histories
Built for law firms needing all-in-one matter management with workflow automation.
MyCase
Client portal with built-in messaging and document access tied to each matter
Built for law firms needing matter tracking and client communication in one system.
PracticePanther
Visual workflow automation for tasks, statuses, and case stages
Built for law firms needing integrated intake, matter tracking, and billing automation.
Related reading
Comparison Table
This comparison table contrasts Cloud Law Firm Software options used for legal practice management, including Clio, MyCase, PracticePanther, Rocket Matter, Tabs3, and other common platforms. It highlights how each tool supports case management, billing, document handling, and client communication so teams can map feature sets to workflow requirements. Readers can scan side-by-side differences to evaluate which system best fits matter types, staff size, and integration needs.
| # | Tool | Category | Overall | Features | Ease of Use | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clio Cloud legal practice management for law firms that combines case management, time tracking, billing, documents, and client communication. | all-in-one | 8.7/10 | 9.1/10 | 8.6/10 | 8.3/10 |
| 2 | MyCase Cloud practice management for law firms that supports case organization, time and billing, document workflows, and client portal messaging. | practice-management | 8.1/10 | 8.5/10 | 8.1/10 | 7.6/10 |
| 3 | PracticePanther Cloud law firm management software that provides case management, time tracking, intake forms, and invoicing with automation. | automation | 7.9/10 | 8.3/10 | 7.6/10 | 7.7/10 |
| 4 | Rocket Matter Cloud practice management for small to midsize law firms with case management, calendars, time tracking, and billing tools. | case-management | 8.0/10 | 8.3/10 | 7.7/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 5 | Tabs3 Cloud-enabled legal practice management that covers case tracking, time and billing, document management, and workflow tools. | billing-and-cases | 8.1/10 | 8.6/10 | 7.9/10 | 7.7/10 |
| 6 | Bill4Time Cloud legal time tracking and billing system that converts tracked time into invoices for law firm clients and matters. | time-billing | 7.3/10 | 7.6/10 | 7.2/10 | 7.1/10 |
| 7 | NetDocuments Cloud document management for legal teams with version control, matter folders, permissions, and secure collaboration. | document-management | 8.2/10 | 8.4/10 | 7.8/10 | 8.2/10 |
| 8 | iManage Cloud legal document and knowledge management that supports firm-wide workspaces, permissions, and retention controls. | content-management | 8.2/10 | 8.7/10 | 7.4/10 | 8.2/10 |
| 9 | ContractPodAi Cloud contract lifecycle management that centralizes contract workflows, clause review, and redlining with AI assistance. | contract-management | 8.0/10 | 8.4/10 | 7.7/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 10 | ConvergePoint Cloud legal cost and time management that provides matter budgeting, workflow approvals, and billing analytics for law firms and corporate legal teams. | cost-management | 7.4/10 | 7.6/10 | 7.1/10 | 7.6/10 |
Cloud legal practice management for law firms that combines case management, time tracking, billing, documents, and client communication.
Cloud practice management for law firms that supports case organization, time and billing, document workflows, and client portal messaging.
Cloud law firm management software that provides case management, time tracking, intake forms, and invoicing with automation.
Cloud practice management for small to midsize law firms with case management, calendars, time tracking, and billing tools.
Cloud-enabled legal practice management that covers case tracking, time and billing, document management, and workflow tools.
Cloud legal time tracking and billing system that converts tracked time into invoices for law firm clients and matters.
Cloud document management for legal teams with version control, matter folders, permissions, and secure collaboration.
Cloud legal document and knowledge management that supports firm-wide workspaces, permissions, and retention controls.
Cloud contract lifecycle management that centralizes contract workflows, clause review, and redlining with AI assistance.
Cloud legal cost and time management that provides matter budgeting, workflow approvals, and billing analytics for law firms and corporate legal teams.
Clio
all-in-oneCloud legal practice management for law firms that combines case management, time tracking, billing, documents, and client communication.
Email integration that syncs messages to matters for searchable case histories
Clio stands out with a tight combination of practice management, time and expense capture, and built-in cloud collaboration for legal teams. It centralizes matters, contacts, documents, and task management so daily work stays in one place. Automation features like email syncing and custom workflows reduce manual updates across case files and calendars. Reporting and dashboards provide visibility into workload, deadlines, and activity tracking across active matters.
Pros
- Unified matters hub combining tasks, time, expenses, and document organization
- Email integration keeps communications attached to the correct matter timeline
- Custom workflows and templates standardize intake, tasks, and recurring steps
Cons
- Reporting depth can feel limited compared to analytics-focused enterprise systems
- Document structures may need upfront setup to match complex firm filing rules
- Some advanced automation requires careful configuration to avoid process drift
Best For
Law firms needing all-in-one matter management with workflow automation
More related reading
MyCase
practice-managementCloud practice management for law firms that supports case organization, time and billing, document workflows, and client portal messaging.
Client portal with built-in messaging and document access tied to each matter
MyCase stands out with an all-in-one legal practice workflow that connects matter management, client communication, and status tracking in one place. Core capabilities include case management, document storage, task and deadline management, and built-in client portals for centralized updates. Reporting tools track matter activity, while automations help streamline intake, workflows, and reminders across active matters. The platform also supports e-signature workflows and integrated communication so teams can reduce context switching between systems.
Pros
- Client portal consolidates updates, messages, and document sharing
- Matter timelines and tasks make it easier to manage deadlines
- Workflow automations reduce manual follow-up across active matters
Cons
- Advanced reporting and analytics feel limited versus enterprise practice tools
- Customization for highly unique workflows can require workarounds
Best For
Law firms needing matter tracking and client communication in one system
PracticePanther
automationCloud law firm management software that provides case management, time tracking, intake forms, and invoicing with automation.
Visual workflow automation for tasks, statuses, and case stages
PracticePanther stands out with an integrated legal workflow that blends case management, intake, and daily task execution in one system. It supports matter organization, document handling, calendaring, time tracking, and billing workflows designed for law firms. The platform also includes client communication features that help route work from lead to resolved matter. Automation and reporting focus on operational visibility, including workload and performance views tied to activities.
Pros
- End-to-end intake to case workflow reduces tool switching
- Built-in time tracking and billing workflows match common firm practices
- Automation rules help standardize tasks across matters
Cons
- Advanced configuration can feel complex for simple workflows
- Reporting depth depends on how data is entered consistently
- Some specialty needs require careful process setup
Best For
Law firms needing integrated intake, matter tracking, and billing automation
More related reading
Rocket Matter
case-managementCloud practice management for small to midsize law firms with case management, calendars, time tracking, and billing tools.
Matter timeline and pipeline-style status tracking across time, tasks, and activity
Rocket Matter stands out for its law-firm workflow focus, combining matter intake, time entry, and pipeline-style tracking in one workspace. It supports practice management basics such as contacts, tasks, documents, and calendaring tied to client matters. Its cloud approach targets firms that need consistent tasking and reporting across staff rather than only individual productivity.
Pros
- Matter-centric workflow keeps time, tasks, and activity organized
- Strong reporting for workload, status, and pipeline visibility
- Mobile-friendly time entry supports remote and on-the-go usage
- Document handling links files directly to the correct matter
Cons
- Customization options can feel limited for complex firm processes
- Reporting depth may not match specialized practice systems
- Admin setup requires careful attention to templates and fields
- Advanced automation is not as strong as dedicated workflow platforms
Best For
Service firms needing matter tracking and staff task workflow automation
Tabs3
billing-and-casesCloud-enabled legal practice management that covers case tracking, time and billing, document management, and workflow tools.
Matter workflow engine for routing tasks and tracking intake through completion
Tabs3 focuses on legal work intake and matter management with a built-in workflow engine for tasks, documents, and status tracking. It centralizes client, matter, and activity records so teams can see what is due and who owns next steps. The platform also supports reporting and operational visibility through dashboards tied to matter activity. Tabs3 is designed for firms that want structured processes rather than spreadsheets or manual email tracking.
Pros
- Workflow automation supports repeatable intake to task routing processes
- Matter-centric records consolidate client, tasks, and document activity
- Dashboards provide operational visibility into work status and throughput
- Configurable forms help standardize intake and data capture
Cons
- Setup and workflow design require careful configuration to match firm practice
- Advanced reporting needs may push users toward additional customization
- Document workflows can feel rigid without consistent naming and templates
Best For
Law firms needing matter workflows and dashboards with strong process standardization
Bill4Time
time-billingCloud legal time tracking and billing system that converts tracked time into invoices for law firm clients and matters.
Recurring invoices tied to matters for scheduled billing cycles
Bill4Time stands out with deep law-firm billing workflows built around time tracking, invoicing, and client matter structure. It supports recurring billing schedules and trust accounting style workflows alongside standard activity tracking. The system emphasizes practical document output through invoice generation and customizable fields that fit common legal billing styles. It also integrates reporting and team-level controls needed for multi-user law office operations.
Pros
- Strong time-to-invoice flow tied to matters and clients
- Recurring billing support for repeating legal work
- Customizable invoice layouts and fields for legal billing needs
- Reporting covers operational billing and utilization signals
Cons
- Setup of matter rules can take focused configuration time
- Some workflows feel less streamlined than purpose-built billing suites
- Navigation can be dense for small teams with simple needs
Best For
Law firms needing structured matter billing and recurring invoices without heavy customization
More related reading
NetDocuments
document-managementCloud document management for legal teams with version control, matter folders, permissions, and secure collaboration.
Rule-based retention and defensible audit trails tied to matter and document metadata
NetDocuments stands out for its cloud-first legal document management that supports client matter organization and cross-workspace collaboration. Core capabilities include rule-based retention, granular permissions, full-text search, and matter-centric document workflows. The platform also adds eDiscovery, email management, and integrations to connect document control with downstream legal processes. Admin tooling supports governance through configurable metadata, audit trails, and standardized naming and folder structures.
Pros
- Matter-centric structure keeps document context attached to legal work
- Strong permissions, retention, and audit trails support defensible governance
- Fast full-text search across large document sets
- Workflow features support consistent document handling at scale
- Integrations connect document management with legal tools and eDiscovery
Cons
- Advanced configuration can be heavy for small teams without admin support
- Workflow setup often requires careful planning to avoid inconsistent metadata
- File migration and structure mapping can be time-consuming during rollout
Best For
Mid-size and enterprise firms standardizing governed document workflows in the cloud
iManage
content-managementCloud legal document and knowledge management that supports firm-wide workspaces, permissions, and retention controls.
iManage Workflows with governed task routing tied to matters and documents
iManage stands out with enterprise-grade document and case management built around strong governance and auditability for law firm environments. The platform centralizes matters and content with controls for access, retention, and versioning across cloud storage. Workflow support and integrations help firms route approvals, enforce conventions, and connect deal and practice systems to a shared knowledge layer.
Pros
- Robust governance controls for access permissions, retention, and audit trails
- Matter-focused organization with advanced document versioning and metadata handling
- Workflow and automation options designed for legal processes and approvals
- Strong enterprise integration capabilities for connecting firm systems to content
Cons
- Administration and configuration require experienced platform governance
- User workflows can feel complex without consistent matter taxonomy and templates
- Customization for unique practices can increase implementation time and change management
Best For
Law firms needing governed matter management, strong auditability, and workflow automation
More related reading
ContractPodAi
contract-managementCloud contract lifecycle management that centralizes contract workflows, clause review, and redlining with AI assistance.
AI contract review with guided redline suggestions and clause-level guidance
ContractPodAi focuses on AI-assisted contract drafting and review inside a structured, guided workflow for legal teams. It supports document assembly with clause libraries, redlining workflows, and collaboration features that keep negotiation history attached to the final output. The platform also provides contract storage and matter-linked organization so teams can search and reuse prior language across active work.
Pros
- AI-guided drafting that helps standardize clause selection
- Clause library and templates improve reuse across contract types
- Integrated redlining workflow keeps negotiation context with drafts
- Searchable contract repository supports faster language retrieval
Cons
- Best results depend on well-maintained clause library governance
- Complex negotiations can require more setup than lightweight tools
- UI can feel dense for teams managing small contract volumes
Best For
Legal teams needing AI drafting plus structured contract collaboration
ConvergePoint
cost-managementCloud legal cost and time management that provides matter budgeting, workflow approvals, and billing analytics for law firms and corporate legal teams.
Workflow automation for matter intake and ongoing process orchestration
ConvergePoint stands out with cloud-based practice management built around workflow automation for legal matters and document-centric work. Core capabilities include case and matter management, task and deadline tracking, and role-based access controls. The system also supports intake to resolution workflows with centralized templates and standardized forms. Collaboration tools focus on matter visibility and audit-friendly record keeping rather than general-purpose productivity.
Pros
- Matter-focused workflow automation reduces manual status chasing
- Centralized task and deadline management keeps work aligned to due dates
- Role-based access supports controlled collaboration across legal functions
- Templates and standardized intake reduce variability across matters
- Audit-friendly record handling supports consistent matter documentation
Cons
- Workflow setup can be heavy for teams with simple processes
- Reporting depth can require configuration to match specific KPIs
- UI navigation can feel optimized for workflows over ad hoc tasks
Best For
Legal departments and firms automating intake-to-resolution workflows
How to Choose the Right Cloud Law Firm Software
This buyer's guide explains how to select cloud legal practice and document platforms using concrete capabilities from Clio, MyCase, PracticePanther, Rocket Matter, Tabs3, Bill4Time, NetDocuments, iManage, ContractPodAi, and ConvergePoint. It maps standout workflow, billing, portal, governance, and AI contract features to the firm types that benefit most from each tool. It also highlights common implementation mistakes that show up across these specific systems.
What Is Cloud Law Firm Software?
Cloud Law Firm Software centralizes legal work in a browser-accessible system for matters, documents, client communications, tasks, and reporting. It reduces work lost across email, spreadsheets, and disconnected storage by linking activity to a matter timeline. Tools like Clio and MyCase combine case management, time capture, and client-facing messaging in one workflow. Document governance platforms like NetDocuments and iManage extend this model with rule-based retention, granular permissions, and defensible audit trails for controlled matter content.
Key Features to Look For
The right tool matches the firm’s workflow shape so intake, matter tracking, collaboration, and billing output stay connected to the same matter records.
Matter-centric workflow automation
Matter-centric automation keeps tasks and statuses tied to case stages so work routes consistently from intake to completion. PracticePanther delivers visual workflow automation for task statuses and case stages. Tabs3 provides a workflow engine that routes tasks and tracks intake through completion.
Email or client communication tied to the correct matter
Communication must attach to the right matter timeline so histories remain searchable and dispute-ready. Clio’s email integration syncs messages to matters for searchable case histories. MyCase includes a client portal with built-in messaging and document access tied to each matter.
Client portal with matter-specific access
Client portals reduce status-chasing by letting clients view documents and exchange messages inside each matter workspace. MyCase provides a client portal that bundles messaging and document sharing tied to the matter. This works best when teams want client updates and document delivery without switching systems.
Pipeline and timeline views for work status
Status visibility helps teams manage throughput and deadlines without guessing where work stands. Rocket Matter offers a matter timeline and pipeline-style status tracking across time, tasks, and activity. Rocket Matter also pairs that visibility with mobile-friendly time entry to keep updates current.
Time-to-billing automation with recurring invoices
Billing workflows need structured matter and client linkage so tracked time converts into invoices without manual rework. Bill4Time emphasizes a strong time-to-invoice flow tied to matters and clients. Bill4Time also supports recurring invoices tied to scheduled billing cycles.
Governed document management with retention and audit trails
Document governance prevents accidental disclosure and supports defensible retention. NetDocuments provides rule-based retention and defensible audit trails tied to matter and document metadata. iManage adds enterprise-grade governance with robust access permissions, retention controls, and governed document workflows.
How to Choose the Right Cloud Law Firm Software
A practical selection approach matches the tool to the primary workflow the firm must standardize first, then validates the supporting systems that must connect to it.
Start with the workflow that cannot break
Identify whether intake-to-resolution orchestration, task routing, or document governance is the workflow that must stay consistent. For intake-to-resolution automation, ConvergePoint provides workflow automation for matter intake and ongoing process orchestration. For governed document-centric work, NetDocuments and iManage focus on retention, permissions, and audit trails tied to matter content.
Verify matter attachment for communications and documents
Require that emails and client interactions attach to the correct matter record to prevent fragmented case histories. Clio’s email integration syncs messages to matters for searchable case histories. MyCase’s client portal keeps messaging and document access tied to each matter.
Validate automation depth against real firm complexity
Confirm whether the tool’s workflow engine supports the firm’s required stages, approvals, and routing rules. Tabs3 provides a matter workflow engine for routing tasks and tracking intake through completion. iManage delivers iManage Workflows with governed task routing tied to matters and documents when governance is non-negotiable.
Confirm billing output requirements before committing to time capture
Decide whether billing needs recurring scheduled invoicing or primarily matter-linked time tracking. Bill4Time supports recurring invoices tied to matters for scheduled billing cycles. Clio also includes billing and time capture inside its unified matters hub when the goal is end-to-end practice management.
Plan rollout around setup-heavy governance or templates
Allocate rollout time for tools that rely on metadata rules, templates, and structured naming conventions. NetDocuments can require careful planning for workflow metadata consistency during setup. iManage requires experienced platform governance and consistent matter taxonomy and templates to keep workflows from becoming complex.
Who Needs Cloud Law Firm Software?
Cloud Law Firm Software fits teams that need structured matter records, consistent workflow execution, and controlled collaboration across legal work.
Firms that want all-in-one matters plus searchable communication histories
Clio is a strong match because it centralizes matters, tasks, time, expenses, documents, and automation with an email integration that syncs messages to matters for searchable case histories. Teams choosing MyCase get a matter workflow with a client portal that includes built-in messaging and document access tied to each matter.
Firms needing integrated intake, daily task execution, and billing automation
PracticePanther fits firms that want an end-to-end intake to case workflow with built-in time tracking and billing workflows tied to matters. Rocket Matter fits service firms that need matter-centric workflow organization with pipeline-style status tracking and mobile-friendly time entry.
Firms that require repeatable process standardization with dashboards and routing
Tabs3 fits law firms that need structured processes with configurable intake forms and a workflow engine that routes tasks and tracks intake through completion. This segment also benefits from Rocket Matter’s matter pipeline visibility when staff tasking must stay consistent across teams.
Firms and legal teams that must govern documents and approvals at scale
NetDocuments is built for mid-size and enterprise standardization with rule-based retention, defensible audit trails, granular permissions, and full-text search across large document sets. iManage is the best fit for governed matter management and strong auditability with iManage Workflows for governed task routing tied to matters and documents.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Implementation issues tend to appear when teams ignore required structure, under-configure workflows, or treat documents and communication as independent systems.
Building workflows without matching firm taxonomy and templates
Workflow platforms can become brittle when matter fields and templates do not match real intake and filing rules. iManage requires consistent matter taxonomy and templates to keep governed workflows from becoming complex, and NetDocuments needs careful planning for consistent metadata so document workflows stay usable.
Leaving communications unattached to matter timelines
When emails and client messages are not synced to matter records, case histories fragment across inboxes. Clio’s email integration ties messages to matters for searchable case histories, and MyCase’s client portal ties messaging and document access directly to the matter.
Underestimating reporting setup and data consistency needs
Operational dashboards depend on consistent data entry and configuration. Rocket Matter delivers workload and pipeline visibility, while Tabs3 dashboards require structured intake and consistent workflow completion to show throughput accurately.
Choosing a billing tool without confirming recurring invoice requirements
Recurring billing needs should be evaluated before final selection because it affects how invoices are generated and scheduled. Bill4Time includes recurring invoices tied to matters for scheduled billing cycles, while general practice tools like Clio may require workflow setup to mirror complex billing schedules.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated each cloud law firm software tool on three sub-dimensions. The features score carries weight 0.4, ease of use carries weight 0.3, and value carries weight 0.3. The overall rating equals 0.40 × features + 0.30 × ease of use + 0.30 × value. Clio separated from lower-ranked tools largely through its features that combine unified matters management with an email integration that syncs messages to matters for searchable case histories, which supports both workflow execution and daily user impact.
Frequently Asked Questions About Cloud Law Firm Software
Which cloud law firm software is best for all-in-one matter management with built-in client communication?
MyCase is built around matter management, client portals, and status tracking in one workflow. Clio also centralizes matters and tasks, with email syncing that attaches messages to the correct matter for searchable histories.
What tool supports visual workflow automation tied to case stages and task statuses?
PracticePanther uses visual workflow automation to move tasks and statuses through defined case stages. ConvergePoint also focuses on workflow orchestration with standardized templates for intake-to-resolution processes.
Which option is strongest for structured intake-to-resolution workflows with standardized forms?
ConvergePoint supports intake to resolution workflows using centralized templates and standardized forms. Tabs3 also emphasizes structured processes with a workflow engine that routes tasks, tracks intake completion, and powers dashboards by matter activity.
How do top platforms handle email and document history so work stays searchable by matter?
Clio stands out for email integration that syncs messages to matters so case histories remain searchable. NetDocuments complements this by enforcing matter-centric document workflows with full-text search and rule-based retention tied to metadata.
Which software is designed for governed document management with defensible audit trails in the cloud?
NetDocuments provides rule-based retention, granular permissions, and defensible audit trails linked to matter and document metadata. iManage adds enterprise-grade governance with access controls, retention, and versioning across cloud storage, plus approval routing via iManage Workflows.
Which tools are best for billing workflows that include recurring invoices and matter-based structure?
Bill4Time is built around structured billing workflows with time tracking, invoicing, recurring billing schedules, and matter-tied recurring invoices. Clio and PracticePanther also support time and expense capture, but Bill4Time is the focused option for recurring invoicing and trust-style billing workflows.
Which platform supports contract drafting and review with AI inside a guided workflow?
ContractPodAi provides AI-assisted contract drafting and clause-level guidance inside a structured workflow. It also supports collaboration with redlining that keeps negotiation history attached to the final output, plus contract storage linked to matters for reuse.
What’s the best fit for teams that want pipeline-style matter tracking across tasks and activity?
Rocket Matter uses pipeline-style tracking that ties matter status to time entry, tasks, and activity across the client workspace. Tabs3 offers an alternative with a workflow engine for routing intake and tracking completion status through structured stages.
Which solution is most suitable when the main requirement is governed document collaboration and retention rules rather than general practice features?
NetDocuments is purpose-built for cloud-first document governance with permissions, retention rules, and audit trails plus eDiscovery and email management integrations. iManage similarly centers on governed matter content with workflow and approval routing, making it strong when document control is the primary driver.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 legal professional services, Clio stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
Tools reviewed
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Legal Professional Services alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of legal professional services tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare legal professional services tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.