GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
General KnowledgeTop 10 Best Cl Software of 2026
Top 10 Cl Software picks ranked for collaboration and project workflows. Compare Notion, ClickUp, and Monday.com to find the right fit.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Notion
Databases with relations and dynamic page-linked views
Built for knowledge-heavy teams needing flexible documentation and task tracking in one workspace.
ClickUp
Workflow Automations that trigger actions across tasks, statuses, assignees, and due dates
Built for teams centralizing projects, tasks, and documentation into one configurable workspace.
Monday.com
Automations that trigger actions across items and boards based on field changes
Built for cross-functional teams needing visual workflow automation with minimal setup effort.
Related reading
Comparison Table
This comparison table maps core work-management and productivity capabilities across Cl Software’s set of tools, including Notion, ClickUp, monday.com, Airtable, and Linear. Readers can compare features, workflows, and collaboration patterns side by side to identify which platform aligns with planning, tracking, and execution needs.
| # | Tool | Category | Overall | Features | Ease of Use | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Notion Provides workspace pages, databases, wikis, and task tracking with permissions, search, and collaborative editing. | all-in-one | 8.4/10 | 8.8/10 | 8.2/10 | 8.2/10 |
| 2 | ClickUp Delivers work management with tasks, docs, goals, dashboards, and automation across teams and projects. | project-management | 8.2/10 | 8.8/10 | 7.7/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 3 | Monday.com Offers configurable work management boards for projects, workflows, reporting, and automation. | workflow-automation | 8.0/10 | 8.7/10 | 8.2/10 | 6.8/10 |
| 4 | Airtable Uses spreadsheet-like interfaces backed by relational records to build apps, workflows, and lightweight databases. | database-apps | 8.4/10 | 9.0/10 | 8.3/10 | 7.7/10 |
| 5 | Linear Provides issue tracking and project planning for software teams with fast workflows and integrated planning views. | issue-tracking | 8.3/10 | 8.4/10 | 9.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| 6 | Jira Software Manages software development work with issue tracking, agile boards, workflows, and integrations. | enterprise-issue-tracking | 8.3/10 | 8.7/10 | 7.8/10 | 8.1/10 |
| 7 | Confluence Supports team knowledge bases with collaborative documentation, spaces, and search with permissions. | documentation | 8.2/10 | 8.6/10 | 8.3/10 | 7.5/10 |
| 8 | Slack Enables team communication with channels, messaging, file sharing, search, and automation via integrations. | team-communication | 8.4/10 | 8.6/10 | 8.8/10 | 7.7/10 |
| 9 | Microsoft Teams Provides chat, meetings, and collaboration with file sharing, channels, and organization-wide administration. | collaboration-suite | 8.3/10 | 8.6/10 | 8.3/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 10 | Google Workspace Delivers Gmail, Drive, Docs, Sheets, Meet, and shared administration for collaborative work across teams. | productivity-suite | 8.0/10 | 8.3/10 | 8.7/10 | 6.8/10 |
Provides workspace pages, databases, wikis, and task tracking with permissions, search, and collaborative editing.
Delivers work management with tasks, docs, goals, dashboards, and automation across teams and projects.
Offers configurable work management boards for projects, workflows, reporting, and automation.
Uses spreadsheet-like interfaces backed by relational records to build apps, workflows, and lightweight databases.
Provides issue tracking and project planning for software teams with fast workflows and integrated planning views.
Manages software development work with issue tracking, agile boards, workflows, and integrations.
Supports team knowledge bases with collaborative documentation, spaces, and search with permissions.
Enables team communication with channels, messaging, file sharing, search, and automation via integrations.
Provides chat, meetings, and collaboration with file sharing, channels, and organization-wide administration.
Delivers Gmail, Drive, Docs, Sheets, Meet, and shared administration for collaborative work across teams.
Notion
all-in-oneProvides workspace pages, databases, wikis, and task tracking with permissions, search, and collaborative editing.
Databases with relations and dynamic page-linked views
Notion stands out with a unified workspace that combines wiki-style documentation, databases, and project pages in one interface. It supports structured knowledge and workflows using customizable databases, relations, and views, plus team collaboration with comments and mentions. It also enables lightweight automation through templates, linked pages, and integrations that connect work content to other systems. Notion serves both as a content hub and as a configurable operational layer for teams that manage tasks, assets, and processes.
Pros
- Databases with relations and multiple views enable structured work tracking
- Templates and page reuse speed up consistent process documentation
- Comments, mentions, and shared spaces support active team collaboration
- Permission controls support shared wikis and scoped project areas
- Integrations and API expand workflows beyond manual page updates
Cons
- Advanced database modeling can feel complex for simple team needs
- Performance can degrade with large databases and highly nested pages
- Automation remains limited compared with dedicated workflow platforms
- Reporting across linked data can require careful configuration
- Role-based governance across many pages can become labor intensive
Best For
Knowledge-heavy teams needing flexible documentation and task tracking in one workspace
More related reading
ClickUp
project-managementDelivers work management with tasks, docs, goals, dashboards, and automation across teams and projects.
Workflow Automations that trigger actions across tasks, statuses, assignees, and due dates
ClickUp differentiates itself with a highly configurable work-management workspace that supports lists, boards, timelines, and docs in a single system. Core capabilities include task management with custom fields, workflow automation, reporting dashboards, and multiple views for planning work. Collaboration features cover comments, mentions, file management, and goals tracking tied to execution. The platform also supports integrations and API-based customization for teams standardizing processes across projects.
Pros
- Custom fields and multiple views map complex work to one system
- Workflow automation reduces repetitive task updates across projects
- Goals and dashboards provide traceability from planning to execution
- Robust permissions support structured collaboration across teams
Cons
- Highly configurable setups can feel complex for new teams
- Large workspace structures can slow down navigation and search
- Reporting relies on correct custom field modeling to stay accurate
Best For
Teams centralizing projects, tasks, and documentation into one configurable workspace
Monday.com
workflow-automationOffers configurable work management boards for projects, workflows, reporting, and automation.
Automations that trigger actions across items and boards based on field changes
monday.com stands out with a highly configurable work operating system built around boards, dashboards, and automation rather than rigid project templates. Core capabilities include task and workflow management, customizable fields, SLA-ready tracking, dashboards, and request intake via forms. Team collaboration features include comments, mentions, file attachments, and status updates, plus workflow automation that triggers actions across boards. Reporting supports cross-board visibility through dashboards and recurring performance views for program and operations work.
Pros
- Highly configurable boards with custom fields for diverse workflows
- Robust automation that moves work across teams based on triggers
- Dashboards and reporting enable cross-team visibility without manual rollups
- Collaboration tools like mentions, comments, and attachments stay inside each item
Cons
- Scaling complex board logic can create maintenance overhead
- Some workflows feel board-centric compared with traditional PM tooling
- Reporting can be limited when data lives across heavily customized structures
Best For
Cross-functional teams needing visual workflow automation with minimal setup effort
More related reading
Airtable
database-appsUses spreadsheet-like interfaces backed by relational records to build apps, workflows, and lightweight databases.
Linked records with rollups for relational summaries inside Airtable views
Airtable blends spreadsheet familiarity with relational database modeling, strong views, and flexible automation. It supports custom apps built from tables, links, and rollups, then presents data through grid, calendar, form, and kanban-like views. It also connects workflow steps via automations and external integrations, enabling teams to route work and keep records consistent across processes.
Pros
- Relational fields with linked records and rollups model real workflows
- Multiple view types like grid, calendar, and form-based entry
- Automation builder routes updates across records and connected apps
- Reusable base structure with granular permissions
Cons
- Complex formulas and rollups become hard to debug at scale
- Performance and usability can degrade with very large, heavily linked bases
- Advanced governance requires careful structure and disciplined data entry
Best For
Teams building workflow-tracking apps with lightweight relational modeling
Linear
issue-trackingProvides issue tracking and project planning for software teams with fast workflows and integrated planning views.
Cycle analytics in Linear shows throughput, cycle time, and bottlenecks
Linear stands out with a clean issue tracker that centers work in one place and keeps status visible through its board and activity feed. It supports issue types, labels, milestones, and customizable views that let teams manage delivery without heavy process setup. Tight integrations with GitHub, Jira Cloud import, and Slack make it practical for software delivery workflows and cross-tool traceability. Automation via Linear’s webhook APIs and rules reduces manual triage by updating fields based on events.
Pros
- Fast, focused UI that makes triage and planning workflows fluid
- Board and cycle view support clear prioritization and delivery visibility
- Deep GitHub integration keeps code and issues connected
- Automation rules reduce repetitive updates during issue lifecycle
- Robust search with filters helps find context quickly
Cons
- Limited built-in reporting compared with heavyweight portfolio tools
- Advanced governance like complex permissions can feel restrictive
- Customization for workflows is smaller than in configurable ticketing suites
Best For
Software teams needing streamlined issue tracking with strong dev-tool integration
Jira Software
enterprise-issue-trackingManages software development work with issue tracking, agile boards, workflows, and integrations.
Workflow automation rules that update fields, transition issues, and enforce delivery processes
Jira Software stands out for its highly configurable issue and workflow model that supports software delivery tracking from idea to release. It delivers core agile capabilities like Scrum boards, Kanban boards, backlog management, and roadmapping features built for development teams. Advanced automation, release planning, and integrations with development tools extend it beyond pure ticketing into end-to-end delivery visibility. Governance controls for workflows, permissions, and audit-friendly administration support scaled portfolio work across teams.
Pros
- Configurable workflows and issue types support tailored delivery processes
- Scrum and Kanban boards connect backlog, work-in-progress, and sprint execution
- Powerful automation reduces manual status updates across high-volume work
Cons
- Workflow configuration complexity increases the learning curve for new teams
- Maintaining custom fields and automation can become operational overhead
- Reporting accuracy depends on consistent issue hygiene and disciplined usage
Best For
Software teams needing configurable agile tracking and delivery transparency across projects
More related reading
Confluence
documentationSupports team knowledge bases with collaborative documentation, spaces, and search with permissions.
Jira smart links that maintain traceability between issues and Confluence pages
Confluence stands out for turning shared team knowledge into structured pages that link across projects, policies, and workspaces. It delivers wiki-style authoring, powerful search, and page templates that standardize documentation. Native integrations with Jira enable bidirectional traceability between tickets and the knowledge base. Built-in permissions and audit controls support secure collaboration across teams.
Pros
- Jira-linked documentation keeps requirements, tickets, and decisions connected
- Strong page search and global find makes locating knowledge fast
- Granular permissions and space-level controls support collaboration boundaries
Cons
- Document sprawl can increase maintenance work without governance
- Complex permission setups can be confusing for large cross-team structures
- Performance and navigation suffer with very large spaces and heavy indexing
Best For
Knowledge bases for teams linking documentation to Jira workflows
Slack
team-communicationEnables team communication with channels, messaging, file sharing, search, and automation via integrations.
Threads for focused replies that keep channel timelines readable
Slack stands out with fast team communication built around channels, threaded replies, and searchable history. It supports file sharing, voice and video calls, and integrations that connect workflows to tools like Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, and GitHub. Robust admin controls enable SSO, user provisioning, retention policies, and audit trails for compliance use cases. Its app directory extends Slack with custom automations through workflows and bots to reduce manual coordination.
Pros
- Threads keep discussions readable during high-volume channel activity
- Strong search and message organization across channels and direct messages
- Deep integrations with collaboration, developer, and ticketing tools
- Workflow automation reduces handoffs between tools and teams
- Enterprise-ready admin controls for access, retention, and auditing
Cons
- Message overload can still happen without strong channel governance
- Fine-grained knowledge management requires deliberate tagging and structure
- Automation can become complex without clear ownership and standards
Best For
Teams coordinating across functions with channel-based communication and integrations
More related reading
Microsoft Teams
collaboration-suiteProvides chat, meetings, and collaboration with file sharing, channels, and organization-wide administration.
Teams Channels with threaded conversations for organized, searchable communication
Microsoft Teams stands out by unifying chat, meetings, and document collaboration inside a single workspace. Channels, threaded conversations, and @mentions streamline team communication and follow-ups. Built-in Teams calling and meeting recordings integrate with calendar scheduling for consistent stakeholder access. Microsoft 365 file collaboration and permissions support shared work without separate tooling.
Pros
- Channel-based teamwork with persistent threads keeps decisions discoverable
- Calendar-integrated meetings and recording improve handoff and review
- Microsoft 365 document collaboration stays aligned with team permissions
- Robust search across chats, files, and meeting artifacts speeds retrieval
- Extensive integrations with Microsoft services reduce tool sprawl
Cons
- Large tenants can make permissions and content visibility hard to audit
- Notification noise is common without careful policies and moderation
- Advanced automation often requires additional services beyond core Teams
Best For
Organizations needing secure chat, meetings, and file collaboration in one hub
Google Workspace
productivity-suiteDelivers Gmail, Drive, Docs, Sheets, Meet, and shared administration for collaborative work across teams.
Real-time co-authoring with automatic version history in Google Docs, Sheets, and Slides
Google Workspace stands out for tightly integrated web apps that share data, identity, and collaboration across Gmail, Drive, Docs, Sheets, Slides, and Meet. Core capabilities include real-time co-authoring, version history, granular sharing controls, and enterprise-grade admin for users, devices, and security settings. Search and discovery are strong through Drive indexing and cross-app file retrieval tied to user permissions. Communication and meetings connect through Gmail, Calendar, and Google Meet with scheduling and meeting link workflows.
Pros
- Real-time co-editing in Docs, Sheets, and Slides with conflict-free collaboration
- Drive indexing enables fast search across files, people, and folders
- Centralized admin supports user lifecycle, SSO, and policy-based security controls
- Meet and Calendar scheduling integrates smoothly with Gmail workflows
- Fine-grained sharing and permission inheritance reduce accidental exposure risk
Cons
- Advanced workflows require add-ons, scripts, or third-party tools for scale
- Complex retention and legal workflows can be harder to configure than expected
- Offline editing and compatibility can vary across document formats
- Deep customization often depends on Workspace Marketplace or APIs
Best For
Teams needing secure collaborative documents and integrated email, calendar, and meetings
How to Choose the Right Cl Software
This buyer’s guide helps teams match Cl Software tools like Notion, ClickUp, monday.com, and Airtable to real workflow needs. It also covers software delivery and engineering collaboration with Linear, Jira Software, and Confluence, plus team communication hubs with Slack, Microsoft Teams, and Google Workspace.
What Is Cl Software?
Cl Software tools organize work and knowledge into shared digital spaces with structured tasks, documentation, and automated coordination. These platforms solve problems like tracking execution across projects, connecting decisions to records, and reducing handoffs between tools. Some tools act like configurable work hubs such as ClickUp and monday.com. Other tools act like knowledge and workflow systems such as Notion and Confluence, with strong traceability into Jira-centered delivery work.
Key Features to Look For
The features below map directly to how the top tools actually handle planning, execution, collaboration, and cross-tool coordination.
Relational records and linked summaries
Airtable supports linked records and rollups so relational summaries stay inside the same app views. Notion supports databases with relations and dynamic page-linked views so structured work tracking stays navigable in one workspace.
Workflow automation that moves work across states
ClickUp can trigger workflow automations across tasks, statuses, assignees, and due dates to reduce repetitive updates. monday.com supports automations that trigger actions across items and boards based on field changes, which helps cross-team routing when fields drive the process.
Issue tracking with delivery-focused views and lifecycle automations
Linear centers issue tracking with board and cycle views that prioritize software delivery workflows. Jira Software combines configurable issue workflows with automation rules that update fields, transition issues, and enforce delivery processes.
Jira-connected knowledge and traceability
Confluence includes Jira smart links that maintain traceability between issues and Confluence pages. This setup keeps requirements, decisions, and documentation tied to delivery artifacts without manual cross-referencing.
Collaboration surfaces designed for fast decision-making
Slack uses threads to keep focused replies readable in busy channels, which reduces the cost of searching for decisions. Microsoft Teams provides channel-based threaded conversations and searchable chat artifacts so teams can retrieve context without switching tools.
Collaborative documents and meeting workflows with built-in versioning
Google Workspace provides real-time co-authoring with automatic version history across Docs, Sheets, and Slides. Teams that run planning and review meetings also benefit from Meet and Calendar scheduling workflows tied to Gmail and shared workspace identity.
How to Choose the Right Cl Software
The selection process should start with where work needs to live and how execution must move through statuses, teams, and artifacts.
Pick the system of record style
Choose Notion when a knowledge-heavy team needs databases with relations and dynamic page-linked views for both documentation and task tracking. Choose ClickUp when a team wants one configurable workspace that mixes tasks, docs, dashboards, and automation in the same work management surface.
Match the workflow engine to how work changes
Select ClickUp when workflow automation must trigger actions across tasks, statuses, assignees, and due dates with less manual triage. Select monday.com when automation needs to react to field changes and move work across items and boards for cross-functional coordination.
Choose the data model approach for relational work
Select Airtable when workflow-tracking apps require linked records and rollups that produce relational summaries inside grid, calendar, form, and kanban-like views. Select Notion when dynamic views must be page-linked to database relations so the team can pivot through structured work without exporting data.
Decide whether delivery planning is central or supporting
Select Linear when software teams need streamlined issue tracking with tight GitHub integration and fast cycle analytics for throughput and bottleneck identification. Select Jira Software when agile tracking must support configurable workflows, Scrum and Kanban boards, and automation rules that transition issues and enforce delivery processes.
Integrate knowledge, communication, and collaboration where the team already works
Select Confluence when documentation must stay traceable to Jira issues via Jira smart links. Select Slack or Microsoft Teams when execution updates need to land in channels with threaded replies for searchable decision trails, and select Google Workspace when real-time co-authoring with automatic version history is the baseline collaboration requirement.
Who Needs Cl Software?
Cl Software tools fit teams that must coordinate work and information in shared spaces, then use search, permissions, and automation to keep the shared system usable.
Knowledge-heavy teams that manage processes and tasks together
Notion fits teams that need flexible documentation and task tracking in one workspace using databases with relations and dynamic page-linked views. Confluence also fits teams that want wiki-style documentation with strong search and Jira smart links for traceability into delivery work.
Teams that want configurable work execution across projects in one place
ClickUp fits teams centralizing projects, tasks, and documentation into one configurable workspace with custom fields and workflow automation. monday.com fits cross-functional teams that need visual workflow automation using boards and dashboards with automations triggered by field changes.
Teams building lightweight workflow-tracking applications with relational data
Airtable fits teams that want spreadsheet-like interfaces backed by relational records, including linked records and rollups. This approach supports routed workflow steps and multiple views for data entry and monitoring.
Software teams coordinating issue delivery with engineering integrations
Linear fits software teams that need streamlined issue tracking with fast UI, robust search filters, and cycle analytics for throughput and cycle time bottlenecks. Jira Software fits software teams needing configurable agile tracking, Scrum and Kanban boards, and automation rules that transition issues and enforce delivery processes.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
The most common failures come from building complex structures that are hard to govern, slow down search, or break traceability across linked records and automated transitions.
Over-modeling data for simple workflows
Notion database modeling can feel complex for simple team needs, especially when nested pages create extra navigation effort. ClickUp and Airtable also rely on correct custom field and relational setup, which can turn small processes into heavy configuration work.
Allowing automations without field standards
Workflow automation becomes fragile when custom fields are modeled inconsistently, which directly impacts reporting accuracy in ClickUp. Cross-board automation in monday.com can also become harder to maintain when field logic is inconsistent across many boards.
Building knowledge without governance
Confluence can suffer from document sprawl, which increases maintenance work without space-level governance. Notion can also become labor intensive when role-based governance must be applied across many pages.
Using communication tools as the only system of record
Slack message overload can happen without channel governance, which makes decisions harder to retrieve even with strong search. Microsoft Teams can also generate notification noise without moderation policies, so decisions scatter across chat instead of landing in structured tasks and docs.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
we evaluated every tool on three sub-dimensions: features with weight 0.4, ease of use with weight 0.3, and value with weight 0.3. The overall rating equals 0.40 × features plus 0.30 × ease of use plus 0.30 × value. Notion separated itself from lower-ranked options through its database relations plus dynamic page-linked views, which strengthens both structured work modeling and navigation experience inside one workspace. That combination supports flexible documentation and task tracking at the same time, which improves practical usability compared with tools that focus on only one side of the workflow.
Frequently Asked Questions About Cl Software
Which CL software tools work best as a single workspace for both knowledge and execution?
Notion combines wiki-style documentation with databases, relations, and task views in one interface. ClickUp and monday.com also centralize execution, but they focus more on work boards, automation, and reporting than documentation-first knowledge bases.
What tool is most suitable for routing work with lightweight relational modeling?
Airtable supports spreadsheet-like editing while adding linked records, rollups, and multiple views such as calendar and kanban. ClickUp and Monday.com can model workflows with custom fields, but Airtable’s relational primitives make cross-record summaries and tracking feel more like a data app.
Which CL software option fits software teams that need issue tracking tied to development workflows?
Linear provides a streamlined issue tracker with cycle analytics and strong GitHub and Slack integrations. Jira Software goes further by supporting configurable agile workflows, release planning, and governance controls that scale across multiple development teams.
How do teams link documentation to tickets and keep traceability intact?
Confluence pairs wiki-style pages with Jira integrations that maintain traceability via smart links. Notion can connect pages and workflows through linked databases and integrations, but Jira-linked documentation stays tighter when the work system is the source of truth.
Which CL software options support workflow automation across tasks or boards?
ClickUp triggers workflow automations based on task attributes like status, assignees, and due dates. monday.com automates actions across boards when field values change, while Linear uses rules backed by webhook API events to update issue fields during delivery.
What is the best fit for dev and ops teams that need fast coordination and searchable conversations?
Slack organizes communication into channels with threaded replies and searchable history. Microsoft Teams also supports threaded conversations and file collaboration inside channels, but Slack’s app ecosystem and bot-based workflows often integrate smoothly with engineering tooling.
Which toolset is strongest for secure enterprise collaboration across documents and meetings?
Google Workspace consolidates Docs, Sheets, Slides, Gmail, and Meet with real-time co-authoring and version history. Microsoft Teams pairs chat and meetings with Microsoft 365 file permissions, which helps enterprises centralize collaboration controls in one identity and file system.
How do teams handle request intake and structured processing without heavy setup?
monday.com supports request intake via forms, then routes work through boards and dashboards with automations. ClickUp can also standardize intake using custom fields and automations, while Airtable often fits best when intake requires building a data-centric workflow app.
What CL software choices help when engineers need to reduce manual triage and keep status current automatically?
Linear’s automation uses webhook APIs and rules to update fields based on external events, which cuts down on manual triage. Jira Software provides advanced automation rules that transition issues and update delivery statuses, while Confluence smart links keep the knowledge base synchronized with ongoing work.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 general knowledge, Notion stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
Tools reviewed
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
General Knowledge alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of general knowledge tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare general knowledge tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.