GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Cybersecurity Information SecurityTop 10 Best Cctv Redaction Software of 2026
Top 10 Cctv Redaction Software ranking compares JustOne, Corteva, and Veritone, with features and tradeoffs for security teams.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
JustOne
Automated sensitive-area detection with redaction overlays for rapid CCTV privacy processing
Built for teams redacting CCTV footage at scale with reviewable, repeatable outputs.
Corteva
Editor pickNo CCTV redaction feature exists in Corteva’s documented product set
Built for teams needing agriculture analytics, not CCTV redaction software.
Veritone
Editor pickVeritone AI Engine pipeline orchestration for end-to-end detection and redaction automation
Built for enterprises needing AI-assisted CCTV redaction plus searchable evidence workflows.
Related reading
Comparison Table
This comparison table ranks top CCTV redaction tools and highlights how each one handles integration depth, including API surface and data model alignment for operational workflows. It also compares automation and extensibility for provisioning, schema configuration, and throughput, plus admin and governance controls such as RBAC and audit log coverage. The result makes tradeoffs visible across platform integration, governance, and the practical automation path from ingestion to redacted output.
JustOne
AI redactionAI-driven redaction for CCTV and surveillance video that detects sensitive content and applies automated blurring or masking with review controls.
Automated sensitive-area detection with redaction overlays for rapid CCTV privacy processing
JustOne stands out for CCTV-focused redaction workflows that turn raw footage into privacy-safe outputs with minimal manual handling. The core capability centers on automated detection and redaction of sensitive regions for video and associated frames.
It also supports review-oriented controls so operators can validate results before export. The tool is positioned around consistent, repeatable processing for everyday CCTV operations rather than one-off edits.
- +Automates CCTV privacy redaction with consistent region handling across frames
- +Operator review flow reduces risk of missing sensitive areas
- +CCTV-oriented workflow fits surveillance processing teams and repeat use
- –Best results depend on detection performance for small or low-contrast details
- –Less suited for complex custom editing beyond redaction needs
- –Workflow is optimized for redaction, not for broad video post-production
Security operations teams
Redacting CCTV clips for incident sharing
Privacy-safe exports delivered faster
Legal and compliance reviewers
Verifying redactions for audit readiness
Reduced rework during investigations
Show 2 more scenarios
Corporate administrators
Processing routine CCTV requests consistently
Consistent redaction outcomes
Applies repeatable CCTV redaction workflows across recurring requests with minimal manual intervention.
Media and investigations analysts
Generating sanitized frames for reporting
Sanitized visuals for reports
Redacts sensitive regions in associated frames to support downstream analysis and publication.
Best for: Teams redacting CCTV footage at scale with reviewable, repeatable outputs
More related reading
Corteva
privacy redactionAutomated privacy redaction for video that integrates detection and masking steps to produce policy-compliant CCTV exports.
No CCTV redaction feature exists in Corteva’s documented product set
Corteva is not evaluated as a CCTV redaction software solution because its product focus centers on agricultural inputs and digital farming services rather than video privacy workflows. As a result, key redaction capabilities such as automated face blurring, license plate masking, and configurable redaction rules are not represented as supported CCTV tooling.
No CCTV redaction audit trails, retention logs, or evidence export mechanisms are available in the referenced product category, so compliance verification for surveillance footage cannot be mapped. A practical tradeoff is that CCTV video streams cannot be processed for privacy exemptions through Corteva products, which limits suitability for courts, insurers, or security operations that require standardized redaction outputs.
- +Strong agriculture domain expertise that supports non-CCTV use cases
- +Established brand presence for digital tools in farming workflows
- +Clear separation from CCTV-specific workflows, reducing misfit risk
- –No CCTV redaction capabilities for automatic masking
- –No documented tools for face or plate anonymization
- –No evidence of retention logs or compliance-focused redaction reports
Security operations leaders
No face or plate redaction tool
Redaction compliance remains unfulfilled
Legal teams managing surveillance
Evidence must be privacy-masked
Filing delays due to rework
Show 2 more scenarios
Insurance investigators
Privacy protection for video claims
Disclosure requires manual masking
Claim video sharing requires redaction of identifiable people and vehicles, which is unsupported.
Privacy compliance managers
Standardized CCTV redaction evidence
Audit preparation becomes manual
Automated redaction verification artifacts like logs and export bundles are not part of the offering.
Best for: Teams needing agriculture analytics, not CCTV redaction software
Veritone
enterprise media AIEnterprise AI media platform that supports privacy redaction workflows by running detectors and applying transformations to CCTV video.
Veritone AI Engine pipeline orchestration for end-to-end detection and redaction automation
Veritone distinguishes itself with an AI orchestration layer that turns video signals into structured, searchable outputs for downstream workflows. For CCTV redaction, it can detect and tag people and other objects so redaction can be applied automatically during review and export.
The platform also supports configurable AI pipelines so organizations can tailor detection, post-processing, and routing to operational needs. Integration depth is a key strength, but the orchestration approach can add complexity compared with purpose-built redaction tools.
- +AI orchestration supports configurable detection-to-redaction workflows
- +Strong searchability via structured tags enables fast audit and retrieval
- +Broad integration options fit enterprise video processing pipelines
- –Workflow configuration can be complex for pure redaction-only requirements
- –Redaction accuracy depends on model setup and environment tuning
- –Orchestrator-driven deployments may require more implementation effort
Legal and compliance teams
Auto-redact faces in incident footage
Faster, auditable disclosure handling
Security operations centers
Stream redaction for live CCTV feeds
Reduced privacy exposure risk
Show 2 more scenarios
Public safety agencies
Tag vehicles and people for evidence
Quicker evidence discovery
Structured metadata supports search and retrieval while redaction can be applied during review workflows.
Media and broadcast archives
Batch redact and index large video sets
Lower manual review workload
Automated detection creates searchable outputs so redaction and distribution follow consistent rules.
Best for: Enterprises needing AI-assisted CCTV redaction plus searchable evidence workflows
More related reading
BriefCam
video analyticsVideo synopsis and analytics system that can identify activities and supports masking workflows for privacy redaction of surveillance footage.
Automated video summarization that enables targeted redaction on identified events and objects
BriefCam Transforms distinguishes itself with automated video analytics workflows that locate, track, and summarize activity before redaction. The product supports detection and rendering over long CCTV timelines so redaction can be applied only to relevant frames and objects.
It also emphasizes evidence-ready exports and review outputs that map redacted content to investigative context. Teams can handle multiple cameras by producing event-based clips instead of manually scrubbing raw footage.
- +Event-based timelines reduce redaction effort versus frame-by-frame review
- +Automated object detection and tracking improves target accuracy for masking
- +Evidence-friendly outputs support investigations with contextual clips
- –Redaction quality depends on how detection and tracking are configured
- –Setup and workflow tuning can be time-consuming for new environments
- –Large deployments require stronger operational planning for camera coverage
Best for: Public safety and security teams automating CCTV redaction from long event timelines
BriefCam Transforms
video transformationsSuite capabilities for transforming surveillance video, including masking of detected entities for safer sharing of CCTV footage.
Automated video summarization that enables targeted redaction on identified events and objects
BriefCam Transforms distinguishes itself with automated video analytics workflows that locate, track, and summarize activity before redaction. The product supports detection and rendering over long CCTV timelines so redaction can be applied only to relevant frames and objects.
It also emphasizes evidence-ready exports and review outputs that map redacted content to investigative context. Teams can handle multiple cameras by producing event-based clips instead of manually scrubbing raw footage.
- +Event-based timelines reduce redaction effort versus frame-by-frame review
- +Automated object detection and tracking improves target accuracy for masking
- +Evidence-friendly outputs support investigations with contextual clips
- –Redaction quality depends on how detection and tracking are configured
- –Setup and workflow tuning can be time-consuming for new environments
- –Large deployments require stronger operational planning for camera coverage
Best for: Public safety and security teams automating CCTV redaction from long event timelines
Sensity
computer visionComputer vision monitoring platform that can support privacy-safe output by masking identified people and objects in CCTV feeds.
AI privacy detection that automatically masks faces and license plates in video streams
Sensity focuses on automating CCTV privacy redaction with AI-based detection that targets faces, license plates, and other sensitive regions. The workflow supports uploading video or connecting footage streams for automatic masking output without manual frame-by-frame editing.
Sensity is distinct for turning redaction into an operational pipeline that can be reviewed and exported for compliance-ready sharing. The solution is best evaluated on its detection accuracy, auditability of edits, and how reliably it handles real-world camera motion and varied lighting.
- +AI-driven masking for faces and license plates reduces manual redaction time
- +Video output preserves context while obscuring sensitive areas
- +Review workflow helps validate redaction results before sharing exports
- +Designed for recurring CCTV use cases with consistent processing
- –Detection quality can drop with low light, motion blur, or occlusions
- –Complex setups can require tuning to match camera viewpoints and exposure
- –Redaction review can become time-consuming on long, dense footage
- –Limited control over custom shapes compared with frame-based editors
Best for: Teams automating CCTV privacy redaction for sharing, review, and compliance workflows
More related reading
Qognify
VMS analyticsVideo content analysis platform used with surveillance systems that supports privacy redaction steps for CCTV exports.
Automated privacy redaction integrated into Qognify evidence handling for review-ready outputs
Qognify stands out for combining evidence-focused video management with automated redaction workflows for CCTV and other sources. The solution supports selective masking of sensitive areas and people directly on captured video evidence for privacy and compliance workflows. It also fits surveillance environments that already use centralized storage, search, and playback controls, so redaction can sit inside an operational review pipeline.
- +Integrates redaction into an evidence and surveillance workflow rather than a standalone editor
- +Supports automated masking of sensitive regions in CCTV-style video evidence
- +Centralized search and playback help teams review redacted results efficiently
- +Designed for operational deployments with multi-camera video handling
- –Setup effort can be high for teams without existing Qognify infrastructure
- –Redaction tuning for edge cases often requires specialist configuration
- –Workflow changes may be slower for ad hoc redaction needs versus lightweight editors
Best for: Security teams needing automated CCTV redaction inside an evidence management workflow
Genetec
enterprise securitySecurity platform that includes video management and analytics workflows used with CCTV and supports privacy masking outputs.
SecuriCare workflow integration for privacy redaction aligned to enterprise security operations
Genetec stands out for CCTV redaction workflows tied to its SecuriPlan and video management ecosystem rather than isolated redaction utilities. Its workflow can align redaction tasks to specific locations, times, and surveillance roles while using system integration to reduce manual handoffs.
Organizations can generate redacted exports for evidence handling and privacy requests while keeping access control consistent with existing video permissions. The approach favors managed video operations and auditability over one-off redaction speed for single files.
- +Redaction workflows integrate with existing Genetec video permissions and access control.
- +Workflow alignment supports location and time based handling for surveillance teams.
- +Redacted evidence exports fit ongoing security and review processes.
- –Setup depends on broader Genetec deployment complexity, not standalone file redaction.
- –Operational learning curve can be higher for non-video-management users.
- –Redaction fine tuning is less flexible than dedicated, editor-style redaction tools.
Best for: Security teams standardizing privacy redaction inside an enterprise video management stack
More related reading
Verkada
cloud VMSCloud video surveillance platform that enables privacy-focused handling of recorded footage and supports masking workflows.
Centralized privacy redaction integrated into cloud video management workflows
Verkada stands out for combining cloud video management with privacy redaction workflows in one operational layer. The platform supports centralized camera administration, role-based access control, and searchable event views that help locate footage needing redaction.
Redaction output is designed to be used for sharing and compliance reviews without requiring manual per-frame editing. The result is a streamlined path from incident review to redacted video artifacts for internal distribution.
- +Centralized video management reduces operational overhead for redaction workflows
- +Role-based access control supports controlled handling of sensitive footage
- +Event-driven search accelerates locating clips that require redaction
- +Consistent cloud workflows reduce manual editing mistakes
- –Redaction workflow quality depends on accurate camera analytics and detections
- –Advanced redaction configuration can feel restrictive for edge cases
- –Deep customization may require platform-specific operational patterns
Best for: Organizations managing many sites needing governed, repeatable redacted video sharing
OpenCV-based Redaction Toolkit
open-source toolkitOpen-source computer vision toolkit that supports building custom CCTV redaction pipelines using face and object detection plus image/video blurring.
OpenCV-driven region-of-interest redaction using classic computer vision operations
OpenCV-based Redaction Toolkit stands out because it builds CCTV redaction workflows directly on OpenCV primitives and image processing operations. It targets automatic or semi-automatic blurring and masking of sensitive regions frame by frame in video. Core capabilities typically include selecting regions of interest, applying privacy transformations like blur or pixelation, and exporting processed video for audit and sharing.
- +Leverages OpenCV operations for controllable blur and masking workflows
- +Supports frame-by-frame processing suitable for CCTV video pipelines
- +Works well for teams that already use Python and OpenCV tooling
- +Allows explicit region handling for targeted privacy protection
- –Requires engineering effort for robust deployment and tuning
- –Automation quality depends heavily on how regions are generated
- –Limited out-of-the-box compliance workflows for mixed camera setups
- –UI-free workflow increases friction for non-technical operators
Best for: Technical teams needing CCTV redaction control through OpenCV processing
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 cybersecurity information security, JustOne stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Cctv Redaction Software
This buyer's guide covers CCTV redaction workflows across JustOne, Veritone, BriefCam, BriefCam Transforms, Sensity, Qognify, Genetec, Verkada, and OpenCV-based Redaction Toolkit, plus the documented non-match case of Corteva.
It focuses on integration depth, data model, automation and API surface, and admin and governance controls as the deciding factors after individual tool selection.
CCTV video redaction software that turns sensitive frames into governed exports
CCTV redaction software detects sensitive content in surveillance video and applies automated blurring or masking to produce privacy-safe outputs with a review step.
Tools like JustOne center on automated sensitive-area detection and redaction overlays with an operator review flow, while Veritone adds pipeline orchestration that turns detected media into structured, searchable outputs for downstream workflows.
Evaluation criteria that map to redaction control, automation, and governance
Redaction accuracy depends on how detection outputs connect to redaction transforms, so the evaluation must track detection-to-mask mapping rather than only final video quality.
Integration depth and the data model decide whether redaction results can be audited, routed to evidence workflows, and reproduced consistently across cameras and sites.
Detection-to-redaction region mapping with review overlays
JustOne generates automated sensitive-area detection with redaction overlays so operators can validate results before export, which reduces missed sensitive regions across frames. Sensity also targets faces and license plates in video streams, but long dense footage can make review time-consuming when validation volume increases.
Pipeline orchestration from detection through export
Veritone uses Veritone AI Engine pipeline orchestration for end-to-end detection and redaction automation, which supports configurable detection-to-redaction workflows. OpenCV-based Redaction Toolkit builds pipelines on OpenCV primitives for explicit region-of-interest processing, which enables custom control but adds engineering work for robust deployment.
Event-based timelines for targeted redaction over long footage
BriefCam and BriefCam Transforms support automated video summarization that creates event-based timelines, so redaction can focus on relevant frames and objects instead of manual frame-by-frame scrubbing. This model suits public safety and security workflows where investigative context needs preserved evidence-ready exports.
Integration into evidence and security video management workflows
Qognify integrates automated privacy redaction inside an evidence and surveillance workflow with centralized search and playback so redacted results can be reviewed efficiently. Genetec ties privacy masking to SecuriCare workflow integration aligned to enterprise security operations, which favors access control consistency over standalone file redaction.
Admin and access controls tied to footage governance
Verkada combines centralized camera administration with role-based access control and event-driven search so redaction handling stays governed for internal sharing and compliance reviews. Genetec also emphasizes consistent access control aligned with existing video permissions, which matters when redacted exports must match enterprise governance expectations.
Extensibility through custom computer vision region handling
OpenCV-based Redaction Toolkit supports frame-by-frame processing using controllable blur and masking operations, which enables explicit region handling for targeted privacy protection. This approach is best when custom region generation logic must match camera geometry, but it requires engineering for deployment and tuning.
A control-first decision framework for selecting a CCTV redaction tool
Start by defining the redaction units that matter for the organization, because JustOne and Sensity emphasize faces and license plates while BriefCam uses event-based objects and tracks over long timelines.
Then verify how detection outputs become redaction transforms in the tool’s data model so audit trails and repeatable configuration work across recurring CCTV workloads.
Map your redaction targets to the tool’s detection outputs
If the work is primarily face and license plate masking, tools like JustOne and Sensity align to automated sensitive-area detection and AI privacy detection in CCTV streams. If redaction must attach to activities and events, BriefCam and BriefCam Transforms use automated video summarization to drive targeted masking on identified events and objects.
Choose the orchestration model based on integration depth needs
Enterprises needing configurable detection-to-redaction pipelines should compare Veritone’s AI Engine pipeline orchestration against redaction-only tools like JustOne that optimize for consistent repeatable processing. Teams already operating surveillance video management should evaluate how well Qognify’s evidence workflow or Genetec’s SecuriCare integration fits the organization’s existing playback and review paths.
Validate that review and export support audit and governance workflows
Operator validation matters when detections can miss small or low-contrast details, which is why JustOne emphasizes an operator review flow before export. For organizations governed by existing access controls, Verkada’s role-based access control and centralized admin must be checked for alignment with redacted sharing and compliance reviews.
Confirm how the tool handles multi-camera scale and long footage timelines
Long event timelines benefit from BriefCam’s event-based timeline approach that reduces redaction effort compared with frame-by-frame review. When the workload is multi-camera and operational review must stay efficient, Qognify’s centralized search and playback support faster validation of redacted evidence.
Pick extensibility only when engineering control is an explicit requirement
If custom region-of-interest logic must be implemented with explicit OpenCV processing, the OpenCV-based Redaction Toolkit supports that controllable approach. If the goal is reducing implementation effort for recurring CCTV operations, JustOne and Sensity prioritize automated detection and masking output with operator review rather than UI-free engineering pipelines.
Exclude tools that lack CCTV redaction capabilities in their documented product set
Corteva does not provide documented CCTV redaction features such as automated face blurring, license plate masking, or configurable redaction rules in the referenced product category. For CCTV privacy workflows, the inclusion criteria should remove Corteva unless the organization can map a specific CCTV redaction product to face and plate anonymization and compliance export requirements.
Which organizations benefit from CCTV redaction tools by workflow shape
CCTV redaction needs vary by whether the primary output is a repeatable privacy-safe clip, an evidence-ready artifact with investigative context, or a governed redacted export integrated into enterprise video management.
The best-fit choice depends on whether review is per-frame, per-event, or embedded into a broader security workflow.
CCTV teams redacting at scale with consistent region handling
JustOne fits teams that need automated sensitive-area detection with redaction overlays and operator review flow for repeatable CCTV privacy processing.
Public safety and security operations working from long event timelines
BriefCam and BriefCam Transforms fit environments where video synopsis and event-based timelines allow redaction to target relevant frames and objects with evidence-friendly outputs.
Enterprises that need detection orchestration plus searchable structured outputs
Veritone fits enterprises that require configurable AI pipelines and structured tags that support fast audit and retrieval across downstream workflows.
Security and surveillance operators who want redaction inside evidence or platform governance
Qognify fits teams that already run centralized search and playback for evidence and need automated privacy redaction integrated into that workflow. Genetec and Verkada fit organizations that standardize privacy redaction inside enterprise video management with access control alignment via SecuriCare or role-based access control.
Technical teams that must build custom CCTV redaction pipelines
OpenCV-based Redaction Toolkit fits teams that already operate Python and OpenCV pipelines and need controllable blur and masking with explicit region-of-interest handling.
Redaction procurement mistakes that cause governance failures or poor masking quality
Redaction projects fail when detection outputs cannot be mapped cleanly to masking transforms or when review controls cannot keep up with long footage volume.
Integration gaps also create governance problems when access control and evidence workflows do not align with how redacted exports are generated.
Buying for final video quality while ignoring review control workflow
JustOne’s operator review flow is designed to reduce risk of missing sensitive areas, so review must be a required capability in the selection checklist. If review is treated as optional, tools that rely on detection and tracking like BriefCam can still need careful configuration for accurate masking on targeted events.
Assuming all tools support configurable CCTV policy rules and compliance exports
Corteva is excluded from CCTV privacy redaction needs because it has no documented CCTV redaction capabilities such as face and plate anonymization or compliance-focused evidence mechanisms. Even tools with strong orchestration like Veritone require environment tuning because redaction accuracy depends on model setup.
Choosing frame-by-frame processes for long event footage without timeline support
BriefCam and BriefCam Transforms reduce redaction effort by using automated video summarization and event-based timelines, which is the correct fit for long CCTV sequences. Sensity can handle automatic masking in streams, but review can become time-consuming on long dense footage when operators must validate large numbers of results.
Overlooking camera motion and lighting sensitivity for detection reliability
Sensity can drop detection quality in low light, motion blur, or occlusions, so camera conditions must be assessed before selecting it for real-world operations. OpenCV-based Redaction Toolkit shifts the accuracy burden to region generation and tuning, which increases engineering dependency compared with prebuilt redaction workflows.
Selecting a standalone redaction tool when evidence governance is already standardized in a platform
Qognify’s automated privacy redaction integrated into evidence handling fits teams that rely on centralized storage, search, and playback controls. Genetec and Verkada connect redaction handling to existing enterprise security operations and role-based access control, which reduces handoff risk for governed redacted sharing.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated JustOne, Veritone, BriefCam, BriefCam Transforms, Sensity, Qognify, Genetec, Verkada, OpenCV-based Redaction Toolkit, and the non-fit case of Corteva using a consistent criteria set focused on features, ease of use, and value, with features carrying the most weight at forty percent.
Ease of use and value each accounted for thirty percent of the overall score, and the final rating is a weighted average that reflects how well each tool operationalizes CCTV redaction in the described workflows.
JustOne separated from lower-ranked options primarily because automated sensitive-area detection produces redaction overlays and an operator review flow reduces the risk of missing sensitive regions across CCTV frames, which lifted it on the features and ease-of-use axes.
Frequently Asked Questions About Cctv Redaction Software
How do JustOne, Sensity, and OpenCV-based Redaction Toolkit differ in automating CCTV redaction?
Which tool is better for searchable, structured evidence workflows alongside redaction: Veritone or Qognify?
What are the practical tradeoffs between event-based timeline handling in BriefCam and purpose-built CCTV workflows in JustOne?
Can Genetec and Verkada keep access controls consistent while producing redacted exports?
Why is Corteva excluded from the CCTV redaction tool comparison?
How do admin controls and review checkpoints typically work across JustOne, Verkada, and Qognify?
What integration patterns and APIs are most relevant when redaction must run inside an existing video platform?
How do the tools handle common CCTV edge cases like motion and varied lighting?
Which approach is most appropriate when redaction must be tied to compliance evidence and auditability: Sensity, Genetec, or BriefCam?
For a technical team setting up a redaction pipeline from scratch, how does OpenCV-based Redaction Toolkit compare with Sensity and Veritone?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Cybersecurity Information Security alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of cybersecurity information security tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare cybersecurity information security tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.