GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Digital Transformation In IndustryTop 10 Best Business Operating System Software of 2026
Ranked roundup of Business Operating System Software tools, comparing monday.com, Microsoft Power Platform, and Salesforce Platform for business teams.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
monday.com
Board automations with triggers and conditions for self-updating workflows
Built for teams standardizing cross-functional workflows with visual tracking and automation.
Microsoft Power Platform
Editor pickPower Automate cloud flows with connector-based workflow automation and rich triggers
Built for teams automating operations with Microsoft ecosystem integration and low-code app delivery.
Salesforce Platform
Editor pickFlow automations with reusable Flow components for multi-step business processes
Built for enterprises standardizing CRM-driven operations with low-code automation.
Related reading
Comparison Table
This comparison table ranks Business Operating System software by integration depth, shared data model design, automation and API surface, and the admin and governance controls that shape RBAC, provisioning, and audit log coverage. It highlights how monday.com, Microsoft Power Platform, and Salesforce Platform handle schema, extensibility, and API-driven workflow throughput across work, process, and service workflows.
monday.com
workflow-centricProvides a configurable work operating system that manages strategy, projects, workflows, and dashboards across teams.
Board automations with triggers and conditions for self-updating workflows
monday.com stands out with highly configurable work management boards that can model workflows across teams without requiring custom software builds. It supports task views, dashboards, automations, and structured data fields that power tracking for projects, operations, and cross-functional processes.
Reporting and integrations connect execution to visibility through portfolio-style rollups and linked tools. It also offers role-based access and workflow governance features that help standardize how teams run repeatable work.
- +Flexible boards with custom fields enable tailored workflows across departments
- +Powerful automation rules reduce manual updates for recurring processes
- +Dashboards and reporting provide real-time visibility into work status
- +Robust integrations connect issue tracking, chat, documents, and calendars
- +Permissions and automations support consistent execution at scale
- –Complex automations and permissions can become hard to troubleshoot
- –Advanced reporting needs careful setup to avoid misleading views
- –Large board ecosystems can feel cluttered without strict naming conventions
Revenue operations teams
Pipeline updates across sales and marketing
Faster lead-to-forecast accuracy
Project management offices
Portfolio rollups for multi-team delivery
Clear cross-program visibility
Show 2 more scenarios
Operations and compliance teams
Audit-ready workflows with approvals
Reduced audit remediation work
Role-based access and governance enforce approvals, checklists, and traceable status changes.
Product operations teams
Roadmap tracking with structured work items
Fewer missed launch dependencies
Custom fields capture feature intake, dependencies, and delivery dates with automated handoffs.
Best for: Teams standardizing cross-functional workflows with visual tracking and automation
More related reading
Microsoft Power Platform
enterprise automationEnables process automation and business app development using Power Apps, Power Automate, and data modeling with the Dataverse.
Power Automate cloud flows with connector-based workflow automation and rich triggers
Microsoft Power Platform stands out by combining low-code apps, automated workflows, and analytics with strong integration into Microsoft 365 and Azure. Power Apps enables business app creation with connectors, data modeling, and model-driven or canvas-based interfaces.
Power Automate delivers event and scheduled workflow automation across SaaS and on-prem systems, while Power BI adds self-service reporting over governed data. Common data and identity ties across the ecosystem make it usable as a coherent business operating layer rather than isolated tools.
- +Unified suite ties apps, workflows, and analytics to shared data patterns
- +Large connector library spans Microsoft 365, Dynamics, and many external SaaS systems
- +Model-driven apps support business logic, forms, views, and role-based security
- –Governance and lifecycle controls require deliberate setup to prevent sprawl
- –Complex workflows can become hard to debug without disciplined naming and testing
Finance operations teams
Automate invoice intake and approvals
Faster cycle times
Customer service operations teams
Create case workflows with CRM data
Reduced manual handling
Show 2 more scenarios
IT governance and platform teams
Standardize app creation with controls
Lower compliance risk
Governed data, environment policies, and reusable components support consistent deployment across business units.
Sales and revenue operations teams
Build pipeline dashboards on governed data
More accurate forecasting
Power BI delivers self-service reporting over cleansed datasets with consistent definitions and refresh schedules.
Best for: Teams automating operations with Microsoft ecosystem integration and low-code app delivery
Salesforce Platform
CRM platformDelivers a business operating platform for workflow automation, case and service processes, and custom application development on the Lightning experience.
Flow automations with reusable Flow components for multi-step business processes
Salesforce Platform stands out through tight integration of CRM data, low-code app building, and automation across enterprise workflows. It supports custom app development with Lightning components and an extensible data model using objects and APIs.
Automation is delivered via Flow and programmatic actions, while governance, sharing, and security controls are built into the platform. Reporting and analytics tie back to operational data through dashboards, Einstein Analytics, and integration patterns for broader system reach.
- +Flow automation connects UI, data, and external calls with reusable logic
- +A strong permission and sharing model supports multi-team enterprise governance
- +Lightning components enable custom user experiences on top of standard entities
- +Robust API and integration options support real-time and batch system sync
- +Salesforce reporting and analytics integrate directly with platform data
- –Complex org setup and security tuning can slow rollout for new teams
- –Deep customization can create maintenance overhead across multiple layers
- –Performance and data modeling choices require careful design for scale
- –Some advanced automation patterns demand developer support
Revenue operations teams
Automate lead to opportunity workflows
Faster pipeline creation
Customer support managers
Build service apps on Lightning
Quicker case resolution
Show 2 more scenarios
IT platform administrators
Enforce data governance and access
Controlled cross-system access
Sharing rules, field-level security, and audit controls manage access across custom objects and integrations.
Operations analysts
Report on operational performance
Actionable real-time insights
Dashboards and Einstein Analytics summarize operational metrics from CRM objects and connected systems.
Best for: Enterprises standardizing CRM-driven operations with low-code automation
SAP Signavio
process intelligenceSupports business process intelligence and process management for digital transformation initiatives using modeling, discovery, and workflow design capabilities.
Process intelligence discovery with variant and performance analytics over real event logs
SAP Signavio stands out with a process-intelligence and process-management suite built around business process discovery, modeling, and continuous improvement. It supports process mining workflows, BPMN modeling, and workflow collaboration to align teams on how work should run. Strong integration with SAP ecosystems and enterprise governance helps connect documented processes to transformation initiatives and operational metrics.
- +Process intelligence to discover bottlenecks and variants from event data
- +BPMN modeling with collaboration tools for structured process governance
- +Strong fit with SAP landscapes for end to end transformation programs
- –Modeling and governance workflows can require substantial configuration effort
- –Usability varies across process mining and modeling tasks
- –Advanced analytics setup can be heavy for teams without data ownership
Best for: Enterprises standardizing business processes and improving execution using process intelligence
ServiceNow
enterprise workflowsRuns enterprise workflows for IT service management, customer service, and operations with configurable process apps and orchestration.
Workflow automation using ServiceNow Flow Designer with approvals, SLAs, and scoped task routing
ServiceNow stands out for unifying IT and business operations on a single workflow engine tied to a configurable data model. Core modules include ITSM, ITOM, customer service, case management, HR service delivery, and automated process orchestration.
It also supports integration, workflow governance, and analytics through dashboards and reporting across operational workflows. The platform typically reduces handoffs by routing work via configurable approvals, SLAs, and task assignments.
- +Highly configurable workflow automation with approvals, SLAs, and task routing
- +Strong service management depth across ITSM, ITOM, and customer service
- +Robust integration ecosystem for connecting operational systems and data
- +Enterprise-grade reporting and dashboards across processes and service performance
- –Setup and customization require specialist configuration to avoid workflow sprawl
- –Role and permission design can become complex across many processes and teams
- –Performance tuning and upgrade impacts can demand ongoing admin effort
- –Advanced capabilities can increase project scope beyond initial process mapping
Best for: Enterprises standardizing service workflows across IT and business departments
Atlassian Jira Software
agile deliveryTracks agile software delivery with issue management, boards, releases, and automation for planning and execution at scale.
Workflow Builder with Jira Automation for state-driven rules and notifications
Atlassian Jira Software stands out for combining configurable issue workflows with deep integration to development work. It supports agile planning through Scrum and Kanban boards, along with release and roadmap views for tracking delivery.
Teams can automate status changes and notifications using workflow rules and Jira Automation. Reporting becomes actionable through dashboards, advanced search, and analytics from issue and sprint data.
- +Highly configurable workflows that match real development lifecycle states
- +Scrum and Kanban boards support sprint planning and continuous delivery tracking
- +Powerful automation rules reduce manual updates and keep projects consistent
- +Strong reporting with dashboards, burndown, and advanced search across issues
- –Workflow configuration complexity can slow setup for non-admin teams
- –Cross-project reporting can require careful permission design and planning
- –Scaling performance and governance depend heavily on administration and hygiene
Best for: Software teams needing agile planning, workflows, and traceability in one system
Atlassian Confluence
knowledge hubOrganizes team knowledge and operating procedures using collaborative pages, templates, and structured documentation.
Jira Smart Links that embed live issue and status context inside Confluence pages
Atlassian Confluence turns team knowledge into structured spaces with pages, blogs, and templates that keep documentation findable. It integrates tightly with Jira and Atlassian apps to link requirements, issues, and work artifacts directly to pages.
Strong collaboration features include real-time editing, page permissions, and team-wide search across content. It serves as a practical business operating layer for planning, governance, and shared decision records across projects.
- +Jira-to-page linking keeps requirements, issues, and documentation in sync
- +Robust page search and organization with spaces, hierarchies, and labels
- +Granular permissions support teams, projects, and restricted content workflows
- –Information architecture overhead increases as spaces and templates multiply
- –Advanced governance needs careful setup to avoid duplicated or outdated pages
- –Cross-system processes require more manual coordination than workflow platforms
Best for: Teams maintaining Jira-linked documentation, runbooks, and shared operating procedures
Smartsheet
planning and reportingManages work execution with spreadsheet-like planning, task tracking, approvals, and reporting built for cross-functional operations.
Automation rules that drive field updates, notifications, and workflow changes across sheets
Smartsheet stands out for turning work plans into structured grid-based execution that can scale across teams and departments. It supports configurable workflows, automated update rules, and reusable templates for project tracking, intake, and cross-team coordination. The platform adds lightweight reporting via dashboards and analytics, plus strong collaboration features like comments, approvals, and activity visibility.
- +Highly configurable grid layouts for projects, operations, and resource tracking
- +Automation rules update fields, assignees, and statuses without custom code
- +Dashboards and reports summarize work across sheets and portfolios
- –Complex formulas and large workspaces can make governance harder
- –Automation coverage depends on modeling work into sheet structures
- –Advanced portfolio coordination can feel less streamlined than dedicated PM suites
Best for: Operations teams standardizing workflows on spreadsheets with automation and dashboards
Workday Adaptive Planning
planning and analyticsSupports planning and performance management workflows for budgeting, forecasting, and operational planning across business units.
Driver-based planning with scenario modeling for multi-dimensional what-if analysis
Workday Adaptive Planning stands out by pairing planning and forecasting built for finance and enterprise planning with deep Workday integration for shared data definitions and close alignment to operational cycles. It supports driver-based planning, scenario modeling, and what-if analysis across multiple planning dimensions, with workflow and approval steps embedded in the planning process. Strong reporting and dashboarding tie planning outputs to performance tracking, while its budgeting and forecasting capabilities focus on controllership-grade requirements and repeatable planning cycles.
- +Driver-based planning supports scalable budgeting and forecasting models
- +Scenario and what-if analysis enables fast comparisons across assumptions
- +Workflow and approvals embed governance into the planning process
- +Workday integration supports consistent data definitions and planning alignment
- –Model setup requires significant expertise to avoid planning and calculation issues
- –Less suited for lightweight, simple planning use cases without structured processes
- –Customization can increase complexity for ongoing model maintenance
Best for: Mid-market to enterprise finance teams managing driver-based planning cycles
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
ERP operating systemRuns core enterprise operations with financials, procurement, project management, and operational execution workflows in a unified ERP suite.
Advanced Approvals and workflow orchestration across Fusion Financials and operational modules.
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP stands out for its deep Oracle Fusion Applications suite integration across financials, supply chain, procurement, and project execution. It supports end-to-end business process control with configurable workflows, advanced approvals, and audit-friendly ledgers.
Built-in analytics and reporting connect operational activity to financial outcomes through real-time operational data and planning views. Strong security, role-based access, and governance features support enterprise compliance needs across global organizations.
- +Integrated suite coverage across finance, procurement, supply chain, and projects.
- +Configurable approvals and workflow management supports governed end-to-end processes.
- +Strong security controls with role-based access and enterprise auditability.
- +Embedded analytics ties operational execution to financial performance tracking.
- –Implementation and process design effort can be heavy for complex organizations.
- –Some UI flows feel enterprise-dense and require training to use efficiently.
- –Business process reporting often depends on configuration and data modeling work.
Best for: Enterprises standardizing ERP processes with governed workflows and analytics.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 digital transformation in industry, monday.com stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Business Operating System Software
This buyer's guide covers business operating system software choices across monday.com, Microsoft Power Platform, Salesforce Platform, SAP Signavio, ServiceNow, Atlassian Jira Software, Atlassian Confluence, Smartsheet, Workday Adaptive Planning, and Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP.
The guide focuses on integration depth, the underlying data model, automation and API surface, and admin and governance controls that determine whether workflows stay maintainable at scale.
The selection criteria also connect directly to how each tool’s data and automation primitives work in practice, including board triggers in monday.com, connector-based flows in Power Automate, and Flow automations in Salesforce.
Evaluation criteria that determine integration breadth and governance control depth
Integration depth determines whether the system can connect work artifacts, identity, and operational systems without duplicating data or building fragile glue. Microsoft Power Platform’s connector-based automation and Dataverse data modeling make it easier to build consistent app and workflow layers across Microsoft 365, Dynamics, and external SaaS.
Data model and automation surface decide whether workflows remain maintainable when teams add use cases. monday.com’s structured board fields and ServiceNow’s workflow engine tied to a configurable data model both drive governance and reporting, but they impose different setup and hygiene requirements.
Automation triggers with condition logic
Automation must move beyond simple notifications and update workflow state based on triggers and conditions. monday.com board automations support triggers and conditions for self-updating workflows, while ServiceNow Flow Designer supports approvals, SLAs, and scoped task routing tied to workflow steps.
API and extensibility surface for cross-system orchestration
Automation and integration depend on how workflows call external systems and reuse automation logic through APIs and components. Salesforce Platform delivers Flow automations with reusable Flow components and supports robust API and integration options for system sync, while Microsoft Power Automate cloud flows use connector-based automation with rich triggers.
Shared data model tied to governance and reporting
A consistent data model prevents reporting drift by grounding dashboards and analytics on the same structured entities. Microsoft Power Platform uses Dataverse modeling and shared identity and data patterns, while ServiceNow unifies workflows on a configurable data model and delivers enterprise dashboards and reporting across operational workflows.
RBAC, sharing controls, and admin governance tooling
Admin and governance controls determine whether teams can scale without permission chaos. Salesforce Platform includes a strong permission and sharing model with multi-team enterprise governance controls, and monday.com provides role-based access and workflow governance features to standardize repeatable work.
Lifecycle controls that prevent workflow sprawl
Governance also includes lifecycle discipline, naming conventions, and testing support because complex workflows can become hard to debug. Microsoft Power Platform requires deliberate governance and lifecycle setup to prevent sprawl, and Jira Software workflow configuration complexity depends heavily on admin hygiene for cross-project reporting.
Operational reporting aligned to workflow state
Reporting has to read the workflow state without misleading operators. monday.com offers dashboards and reporting for real-time visibility, while Atlassian Jira Software adds dashboards, burndown, and advanced search over issues and sprint data to make execution status actionable.
A decision path that matches your integration and governance needs to the right execution model
Start by matching the tool’s workflow execution model to how the organization runs work, since board-based tracking behaves differently than ERP or service workflow engines. monday.com is strongest for configurable cross-functional workflows with board automations, while ServiceNow targets enterprise service and operations workflows with approvals, SLAs, and scoped routing.
Next, validate that the data model and automation surface support integration breadth without creating ungoverned sprawl. Microsoft Power Platform, Salesforce Platform, and Jira Software all provide automation layers, but each tool’s governance and lifecycle requirements shape rollout risk.
Map the workflow engine to the process type
Use monday.com when the operating model needs configurable boards with structured fields plus board automations for repeating work across teams. Use ServiceNow when the process needs approvals, SLAs, and task routing inside a workflow engine tied to operational service modules like ITSM and customer service.
Validate the data model that will back reporting and automation
Choose Microsoft Power Platform when the shared entity layer must be Dataverse-backed so apps, workflows, and analytics align on governed data patterns. Choose Salesforce Platform when CRM-driven operations require an extensible data model using objects backed by APIs and Flow automation.
Confirm automation extensibility and integration call patterns
Confirm that Power Automate cloud flows use connector-based workflow automation with rich triggers for event and scheduled logic across SaaS and on-prem systems. Confirm that Salesforce Flow supports reusable Flow components for multi-step business processes that call external systems with robust API and integration options.
Stress-test governance and admin controls before scaling use cases
If rollout will involve many teams, validate RBAC and workflow governance settings in tools like monday.com and Salesforce Platform where role-based access and sharing model design are central. If many workflow variants are expected, validate lifecycle discipline for complex automations in Power Platform or workflow configuration complexity controls in Jira Software.
Plan for reporting that matches operators’ mental model
Use monday.com dashboards for real-time work status when operators track progress through board state and structured fields. Use Jira Software dashboards and burndown when execution is managed through Scrum and Kanban issue workflows with advanced search and analytics.
Add process intelligence or knowledge artifacts where the gap is visibility, not execution
If the main requirement is process discovery from event logs and BPMN collaboration, use SAP Signavio to analyze variants and performance over real process signals. If the gap is runbooks and decision records tied to live work, use Atlassian Confluence with Jira Smart Links that embed live issue and status context inside pages.
Which organizations get the most control and automation from these business operating system tools
Different tools optimize different parts of the operating system stack, so the best fit depends on whether the organization prioritizes work orchestration, governed app automation, service workflow routing, finance planning, or ERP process control.
The segments below map directly to the best_for positioning for each reviewed tool and the specific mechanisms each tool uses to deliver control at scale.
Cross-functional operations teams standardizing repeatable workflows with visual execution
monday.com fits when work must be modeled as boards with structured data fields and updated through board automations with triggers and conditions. Teams get governance from role-based access and workflow governance features that help standardize execution across departments.
Teams automating operations inside the Microsoft ecosystem with low-code app delivery
Microsoft Power Platform fits when the operating layer must connect Power Apps, Power Automate, and Power BI to Dataverse data modeling and identity patterns. It supports connector-based workflow automation with rich triggers for event and scheduled logic across Microsoft 365, Dynamics, and external SaaS.
Enterprises standardizing CRM-driven processes with reusable, multi-step automation logic
Salesforce Platform fits when CRM objects and APIs must back automation and reporting while governance is controlled by a permission and sharing model. Flow automations with reusable Flow components support multi-step processes, and Lightning components enable custom user experiences on standard entities.
Enterprises standardizing service delivery and routing with approvals and SLAs
ServiceNow fits when workflow orchestration must include approvals, SLAs, and scoped task routing across ITSM and customer service operations. Its configurable data model unifies workflows under a single workflow engine and supports enterprise dashboards and reporting.
Finance teams running structured budgeting and forecasting cycles with scenarios
Workday Adaptive Planning fits when planning and performance management needs driver-based modeling, scenario and what-if analysis, and embedded workflow approvals. It also aligns planning cycles through Workday integration and consistent data definitions.
Pitfalls that break governance, integration, and automation maintainability
Business operating system deployments fail when automation and data models are added without admin controls or without lifecycle discipline. The reviewed tools show recurring issues around sprawl, troubleshooting complexity, and performance and configuration hygiene.
The fixes below connect directly to the friction points called out in the reviewed tools and to the governance mechanisms that prevent recurrence.
Building complex automations without a troubleshooting plan
monday.com automations and Power Platform workflow logic can become hard to troubleshoot when triggers and conditions scale beyond a small set of cases. Use disciplined naming and test workflows early in Power Platform and enforce strict automation structure in monday.com to keep state changes traceable.
Under-designing governance for permissions and cross-system access
ServiceNow role and permission design becomes complex across many processes and teams, and Salesforce Platform org setup security tuning can slow rollout. Start permission modeling early for ServiceNow workflows and sharing model design for Salesforce so cross-team access stays consistent as new processes get added.
Letting configuration sprawl degrade reporting clarity
monday.com can feel cluttered without strict naming conventions when board ecosystems grow, and Power Platform governance requires deliberate setup to prevent sprawl. Enforce naming conventions for monday.com boards and apply Power Platform governance and lifecycle controls to limit uncontrolled workflow variants.
Relying on documentation without closing the loop to live execution state
Confluence alone can become an information architecture overhead when spaces and templates multiply, and it can require manual coordination for cross-system processes. Use Atlassian Confluence with Jira Smart Links so embedded live issue and status context stays connected to actual execution.
Using spreadsheet-like automation when the process needs a stronger workflow engine
Smartsheet field-driven automation depends on modeling work into sheet structures, and governance gets harder with complex formulas and large workspaces. Use Smartsheet for operational tracking on grids, and move to ServiceNow Flow Designer or Jira Software workflow rules when approvals, SLAs, or state-driven execution require tighter workflow semantics.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated monday.com, Microsoft Power Platform, Salesforce Platform, SAP Signavio, ServiceNow, Atlassian Jira Software, Atlassian Confluence, Smartsheet, Workday Adaptive Planning, and Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP using three scoring categories that reflect operational deployment outcomes. Features carries the most weight because integration depth, data model fit, and automation and API surface determine whether teams can implement real workflows without rebuilding core logic. Ease of use and value each contribute meaningfully because governance controls and workflow setup complexity affect rollout speed and long-term administration.
The ranking uses an overall rating computed as a weighted average where features leads with the largest share, and ease of use and value each add the same amount. monday.com stands out in this set because its board automations with triggers and conditions deliver self-updating workflows while keeping execution anchored to structured board fields, which lifted its features strength and overall score through integration-ready execution.
Frequently Asked Questions About Business Operating System Software
Which Business Operating System tools model workflows without custom software development?
How do the top platforms handle integrations and API access for cross-system automation?
What options exist for SSO, identity governance, and access control?
How should data migration be approached when moving operational processes into a new system?
Which tool best supports admin controls and workflow governance across departments?
What extensibility mechanisms matter most when organizations need to extend the data model or UI?
How do process intelligence platforms compare to workflow-first tools for improving execution?
Which systems are strongest for audit logs, traceability, and compliance-friendly operational records?
What are common failure modes when teams automate workflows, and which platforms mitigate them best?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Digital Transformation In Industry alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of digital transformation in industry tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare digital transformation in industry tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.