GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
SalesTop 10 Best Building Quoting Software of 2026
Compare the top 10 Building Quoting Software tools for fast bids and accurate estimates, with picks like Sage Estimating and Buildxact.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Sage Estimating
Estimating templates and structured cost breakdowns that produce consistent, revision-aware quotes
Built for estimating teams needing repeatable, traceable building quotes with structured cost breakdowns.
STACK Estimating
Calculator-driven estimating that converts structured takeoff quantities into priced line items
Built for contractors standardizing building estimates and producing itemized client quotes.
Buildxact
Built-in quote versioning and variation handling tied to a single project
Built for home builders and renovators needing fast, repeatable quote documents for standard scopes.
Related reading
Comparison Table
This comparison table evaluates building quoting software across products such as Sage Estimating, STACK Estimating, Buildxact, Booqable, and Jobber. Readers can compare quote creation workflows, takeoff and estimating features, integrations, and deployment options to identify which tool fits specific estimating and project needs.
| # | Tool | Category | Overall | Features | Ease of Use | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sage Estimating Sage Estimating supports takeoff, cost build-up, and bid pricing workflows for construction estimating and quoting. | enterprise estimating | 8.1/10 | 8.6/10 | 7.7/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 2 | STACK Estimating STACK Estimating automates estimating and bid pricing by connecting quantities, costs, and proposal outputs for contractors. | construction estimating | 7.5/10 | 7.8/10 | 7.1/10 | 7.5/10 |
| 3 | Buildxact Buildxact generates quotes and proposals for trades and builders with estimates, templates, and conversion tracking. | SMB quoting | 7.9/10 | 8.2/10 | 7.6/10 | 7.8/10 |
| 4 | Booqable Booqable manages construction job documentation and quoting workflows for service providers using itemized pricing and proposals. | job management quoting | 8.1/10 | 8.4/10 | 7.9/10 | 7.8/10 |
| 5 | Jobber Jobber creates and sends estimates, tracks job progress, and manages customer communications for trades. | field sales quoting | 8.1/10 | 8.4/10 | 8.2/10 | 7.6/10 |
| 6 | eSUB Construction eSUB Construction software manages subcontractor estimating, change orders, and pricing workflows for bids. | subcontractor estimating | 8.0/10 | 8.3/10 | 7.7/10 | 8.0/10 |
| 7 | Procore Procore supports construction quoting through RFQ workflows and bid management tied to project information. | RFQ bid management | 8.1/10 | 8.4/10 | 7.9/10 | 7.8/10 |
| 8 | Knowify Knowify helps contractors produce estimates and proposals with CRM, quoting, and job scheduling features. | CRM quoting | 7.2/10 | 7.4/10 | 7.0/10 | 7.1/10 |
| 9 | Contractor Foreman Contractor Foreman manages estimates and quoting with scope details, pricing calculations, and customer documents. | field quoting | 7.3/10 | 7.6/10 | 7.4/10 | 6.8/10 |
| 10 | invoicera invoicera creates quotes and invoices with customizable pricing, client management, and exportable bid documents. | billing quoting | 7.4/10 | 7.2/10 | 7.8/10 | 7.3/10 |
Sage Estimating supports takeoff, cost build-up, and bid pricing workflows for construction estimating and quoting.
STACK Estimating automates estimating and bid pricing by connecting quantities, costs, and proposal outputs for contractors.
Buildxact generates quotes and proposals for trades and builders with estimates, templates, and conversion tracking.
Booqable manages construction job documentation and quoting workflows for service providers using itemized pricing and proposals.
Jobber creates and sends estimates, tracks job progress, and manages customer communications for trades.
eSUB Construction software manages subcontractor estimating, change orders, and pricing workflows for bids.
Procore supports construction quoting through RFQ workflows and bid management tied to project information.
Knowify helps contractors produce estimates and proposals with CRM, quoting, and job scheduling features.
Contractor Foreman manages estimates and quoting with scope details, pricing calculations, and customer documents.
invoicera creates quotes and invoices with customizable pricing, client management, and exportable bid documents.
Sage Estimating
enterprise estimatingSage Estimating supports takeoff, cost build-up, and bid pricing workflows for construction estimating and quoting.
Estimating templates and structured cost breakdowns that produce consistent, revision-aware quotes
Sage Estimating focuses on standardized building cost estimating with repeatable takeoff-to-quote workflows. It supports line-item estimating, trade and labor structures, and project templates to speed consistent bids. Estimators can manage revisions through change-aware estimating and generate quotable outputs built from the estimating data. The solution is designed for estimating teams that need accuracy, traceability, and disciplined quoting practices across multiple projects.
Pros
- Template-driven estimating speeds repeat bids with consistent cost structures
- Trade and cost breakdown support helps maintain detailed, auditable quotes
- Revision handling supports controlled updates to pricing and documentation
Cons
- Workflow configuration can require more setup effort than basic quote tools
- User experience feels estimation-centric rather than drag-and-drop for takeoff beginners
- Collaboration features for distributed teams are less prominent than core estimating functions
Best For
Estimating teams needing repeatable, traceable building quotes with structured cost breakdowns
More related reading
STACK Estimating
construction estimatingSTACK Estimating automates estimating and bid pricing by connecting quantities, costs, and proposal outputs for contractors.
Calculator-driven estimating that converts structured takeoff quantities into priced line items
STACK Estimating stands out for turning building takeoffs into structured estimates with calculators that map line items to measurable quantities. It supports quote creation workflows with itemized scopes, pricing logic, and outputs designed for client-ready proposals. The system focuses on repeatable estimate builds so teams can standardize assemblies and reduce manual rework. It is best assessed on how well it handles estimator input, quantity takeoff structure, and the clarity of generated quote documents for subcontractor and client communication.
Pros
- Estimate generation links line items to structured scope entries
- Supports repeatable quoting workflows with consistent item organization
- Produces clear, itemized quote outputs for faster internal review
Cons
- Workflow setup can feel rigid for highly custom estimating methods
- Limited evidence of advanced automation beyond standard calculator logic
- Document outputs may require cleanup for complex, multi-scope quotes
Best For
Contractors standardizing building estimates and producing itemized client quotes
Buildxact
SMB quotingBuildxact generates quotes and proposals for trades and builders with estimates, templates, and conversion tracking.
Built-in quote versioning and variation handling tied to a single project
Buildxact focuses on turning lead and project details into building quotes with structured templates and automated estimation steps. It supports common quoting workflows such as preparing variations, managing materials and selections, and producing professional quote documents for clients. The system also emphasizes repeatability for estimators who generate similar scopes across residential or light commercial jobs. Collaboration stays anchored in project records so quote revisions stay traceable through the quoting lifecycle.
Pros
- Quote generation stays structured with reusable estimating inputs and document templates
- Variation and revision workflows keep changes tied to the same project quoting record
- Client-ready quote outputs reduce manual formatting work for estimators
- Project organization centralizes scope, selections, and quote versions in one place
Cons
- Advanced custom quoting logic can require setup discipline and careful template design
- Quote workflows feel less efficient when a team uses highly nonstandard estimating methods
- Document customization depth can be limiting for edge-case formatting requirements
Best For
Home builders and renovators needing fast, repeatable quote documents for standard scopes
Booqable
job management quotingBooqable manages construction job documentation and quoting workflows for service providers using itemized pricing and proposals.
Equipment-availability driven quotes that reflect stock and scheduling constraints during estimate creation
Booqable stands out with a quote-and-booking workflow built around real project equipment and availability. It supports estimating with line items and detailed scope fields, then converts that work into customer-facing proposals. The system centers on creating documents quickly while keeping inventory and scheduling constraints in the same operational flow.
Pros
- Quote generation is tightly connected to equipment availability
- Line-item quotes capture project scope with configurable fields
- Document output streamlines proposal creation for client delivery
Cons
- Estimating setups can require careful configuration before scaling
- Advanced quoting logic is less flexible than specialist estimator tools
- Complex multi-party workflows may need process workarounds
Best For
Contractors needing equipment-aware quoting with repeatable proposals
More related reading
Jobber
field sales quotingJobber creates and sends estimates, tracks job progress, and manages customer communications for trades.
Job board that ties quotes to job timelines, status updates, and invoicing
Jobber stands out with end-to-end job management that connects quoting, scheduling, and invoicing in one workflow. It supports building service quotes with line items, add-ons, and client approvals tied to specific jobs. Quote templates and client communication tools help standardize proposal content and reduce back-and-forth. Project status tracking keeps quoting and fulfillment aligned from first estimate through completion.
Pros
- Quote templates with line items and add-ons speed repeat estimate creation
- Job-based workflow links quotes to scheduling and invoicing without separate tools
- Client-facing quote delivery supports approval tracking for fewer follow-ups
Cons
- Limited advanced estimating features for complex takeoffs and assemblies
- Customization options can feel constrained for highly specialized quoting formats
- Automations may require workarounds for multi-step contractor approval flows
Best For
Small to mid-size contractors needing job-linked quoting and client approvals
eSUB Construction
subcontractor estimatingeSUB Construction software manages subcontractor estimating, change orders, and pricing workflows for bids.
Estimate-to-quote template library that standardizes line items across projects
eSUB Construction stands out for estimating workflows tailored to subcontractors, with takeoff, quoting, and bid management designed around trade work. The platform supports structured cost-building from line items and templates, then ties pricing to project documents and scopes. Quote output can be generated for client submission with branding and revision control built into the workflow. Collaboration features support internal estimate review and job tracking from quote stage into execution planning.
Pros
- Trade-focused estimating workflow for subcontractor quoting
- Template-driven line item building speeds consistent bid creation
- Quote generation supports branded, client-ready deliverables
- Revision and estimate review workflow improves bid governance
Cons
- Setup of templates and estimating structures takes deliberate time
- User experience feels estimate-centric rather than document-first
- Integrations for broader ERP accounting workflows are limited
Best For
Subcontractors needing structured takeoff to quote workflow without heavy customization
Procore
RFQ bid managementProcore supports construction quoting through RFQ workflows and bid management tied to project information.
Cost Management linking budgets, commitments, and field changes to bid outcomes
Procore stands out by connecting quoting inputs to field execution data through a shared project platform. It supports bid workflows with commitments, subcontractor management, and document control that keeps pricing and scope aligned. Deep integration with project schedules, RFIs, and cost tracking reduces rework caused by mismatched numbers across teams.
Pros
- Bid and contract workflows stay linked to project documentation
- Cost tracking reduces quote revisions caused by scope drift
- Field-to-office data visibility improves change order accuracy
- Role-based controls support coordinated quoting and approvals
Cons
- Quoting workflows can feel complex for small estimating teams
- Setup effort is high for standardized templates and bid packages
- Reporting requires careful configuration to match estimator views
Best For
General contractors needing quote-to-project traceability across teams
More related reading
Knowify
CRM quotingKnowify helps contractors produce estimates and proposals with CRM, quoting, and job scheduling features.
Reusable quote templates that standardize scope, line items, and document output
Knowify focuses on accelerating building quotes with structured estimating, line-item breakdowns, and reusable templates for repeat work. The system supports turning project inputs into client-ready quote documents and helps standardize scope language across submissions. Quoting teams can manage proposal versions and track the information that feeds calculations into each revision. The overall workflow supports quoting through documentation, though deeper job costing and complex bid workflows depend on how the organization structures data in the tool.
Pros
- Template-based quote creation speeds repetitive estimate production.
- Line-item structure improves consistency across scope descriptions.
- Revision handling helps reduce confusion between quote versions.
Cons
- Advanced cost models require careful setup of item structures.
- Collaboration features for internal approvals can feel limited.
- Integrations for downstream estimating workflows are not a strong focus.
Best For
Contractors needing repeatable quote documents with structured line items
Contractor Foreman
field quotingContractor Foreman manages estimates and quoting with scope details, pricing calculations, and customer documents.
Project-based quote management that links proposals directly to job tracking
Contractor Foreman differentiates itself by combining building estimate creation with an operational workflow for contractors, using projects as the center of quoting and delivery. Core capabilities include quote and proposal building, line-item estimating, and job tracking that ties sales documents to ongoing work. The tool also supports team coordination through user roles tied to project activities. Reporting focuses on project and quote outcomes rather than deep bid analytics.
Pros
- Quote creation is tightly linked to project job tracking
- Line-item estimating supports practical takeoff-style workflows
- Project-based organization keeps quotes and job activity in one place
- Role-based access helps manage internal quote approvals
Cons
- Advanced quote analytics and bidding insights are limited
- Customization depth for complex estimating logic is constrained
- Document formatting and proposal branding controls feel basic
Best For
Contractors needing project-linked quotes and lightweight job management
invoicera
billing quotinginvoicera creates quotes and invoices with customizable pricing, client management, and exportable bid documents.
Quote-to-invoice conversion for turning approved estimates into billable documents
Invoicera stands out for combining building quote creation with invoicing and payment workflows in one app. It supports creating quotes from line items, managing customer and job data, and converting approved quotes into invoices. Built-in templates and editable fields help standardize proposal content for repeat projects.
Pros
- Quote-to-invoice conversion supports a direct estimating-to-billing workflow
- Line-item quotes and adjustable templates help standardize recurring job documents
- Customer and project records reduce retyping across estimates and invoices
Cons
- Advanced construction-specific features like takeoff and spec-driven quoting are limited
- Estimating complexity can feel constrained for multi-phase scope and change orders
- Automations for approvals and multi-user estimating review are not the primary strength
Best For
Small contractors needing fast quoting and invoice handoff without advanced estimating tools
How to Choose the Right Building Quoting Software
This buyer's guide explains how to match building quoting workflows to software capabilities across Sage Estimating, STACK Estimating, Buildxact, Booqable, Jobber, eSUB Construction, Procore, Knowify, Contractor Foreman, and invoicera. It covers key features that show up repeatedly across tool strengths and the tradeoffs that commonly cause implementation friction.
What Is Building Quoting Software?
Building quoting software creates client-ready quotes by turning project scope into priced line items, then managing revisions and proposal outputs tied to a job or project record. These tools reduce manual retyping by standardizing templates, structured cost breakdowns, or calculator-driven quantity-to-price logic. Sage Estimating shows this category through template-driven estimating and revision-aware quote generation built from structured cost breakdowns. Buildxact shows the category through reusable templates, variation handling, and project-tied quote versioning for repeat residential or light commercial scopes.
Key Features to Look For
The right feature mix determines whether quoting becomes repeatable and traceable or stays dependent on estimator formatting and manual cleanup.
Template-driven estimating that produces consistent quote outputs
Sage Estimating uses estimating templates and structured cost breakdowns to produce consistent, revision-aware quotes. eSUB Construction and Knowify also emphasize estimate-to-quote template libraries that standardize line items and scope language across submissions.
Calculator-driven quantity-to-line-item conversion for faster pricing
STACK Estimating uses calculator-driven estimating to convert structured takeoff quantities into priced line items. This design supports repeatable estimate builds by mapping line items to measurable quantities.
Quote versioning and variation tracking tied to the same project record
Buildxact includes built-in quote versioning and variation handling tied to a single project. Procore also connects bid and contract workflows to project documentation so cost tracking and field changes reduce quote drift.
Equipment-aware quoting that reflects availability constraints
Booqable connects quote generation to real equipment availability and scheduling constraints during estimate creation. This keeps proposals aligned with operational constraints rather than treating equipment as an afterthought.
Job-linked workflow that ties quotes to scheduling, delivery, and invoicing
Jobber ties quotes to a job workflow so scheduling and invoicing stay aligned with quote approvals. invoicera strengthens this handoff by converting approved quotes into invoices to support an estimating-to-billing path.
Construction platform traceability from bid inputs to field execution changes
Procore provides cost management that links budgets, commitments, and field changes to bid outcomes. This reduces rework caused by mismatched scope and numbers between field execution and office quoting.
How to Choose the Right Building Quoting Software
Selection should start with the estimating method, the level of quote governance required, and how much quoting must connect to project operations.
Match the tool to the estimating workflow type
Choose Sage Estimating when repeatable bids depend on trade and labor structures with disciplined, auditable cost breakdowns. Choose STACK Estimating when takeoff quantities must convert into priced line items through calculator logic and structured quantity inputs.
Validate how revisions and changes stay traceable
Choose Buildxact when quote variations must remain tied to a single project record with built-in versioning. Choose Procore when revision governance must connect to field execution data through cost management linking budgets, commitments, and field changes.
Confirm the quote output style matches internal and client expectations
Choose eSUB Construction when subcontractor quoting requires branded client-ready deliverables and a template-driven estimate-to-quote workflow. Choose Jobber when client-facing quote delivery needs line items, add-ons, and approval tracking tied to a job timeline.
Assess operational dependencies like equipment, scheduling, and invoicing handoffs
Choose Booqable when proposals must reflect equipment availability and scheduling constraints at quote creation time. Choose invoicera when the quoting process must convert approved estimates into invoices in the same operational flow.
Stress test setup effort versus ongoing repeatability
Choose Sage Estimating or eSUB Construction when the team can invest in workflow configuration to gain disciplined, repeatable quoting across multiple projects. Choose Jobber, Contractor Foreman, or invoicera when the goal is project-linked quoting and document generation without deep estimation structure setup.
Who Needs Building Quoting Software?
Building quoting software benefits teams that must produce repeatable proposals, control revisions, and keep quote numbers aligned with project scope and delivery.
Estimating teams that need traceable, repeatable building quotes with structured cost breakdowns
Sage Estimating fits teams that want template-driven estimating and revision-aware quotes built from trade and cost breakdown structures. eSUB Construction also fits teams that need consistent subcontractor line items through an estimate-to-quote template library.
Contractors standardizing takeoff-to-quote builds with itemized client proposals
STACK Estimating fits teams that need calculator-driven estimating that converts structured takeoff quantities into priced line items. Knowify also fits contractors that want reusable templates for quote documents with structured line items and scope standardization.
Home builders and renovators producing fast, repeatable quotes for common scopes
Buildxact fits builders and renovators who need reusable estimating inputs, professional quote documents, and built-in quote versioning tied to a single project. Booqable fits teams that also need equipment-aware quoting reflected directly in customer-facing proposals.
Small to mid-size contractors managing quoting plus job execution or billing workflows
Jobber fits contractors needing a job-linked quote workflow with client approval tracking tied to job timelines and invoicing. invoicera fits contractors who need a direct quote-to-invoice conversion path with line-item quotes and editable templates.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
The most common buying failures come from choosing a tool that does not match the estimating depth required or that underestimates setup discipline for templates and quoting structures.
Buying a tool that can’t enforce disciplined revision-aware quoting
Choose Sage Estimating for revision handling that supports controlled updates to pricing and documentation built from structured cost breakdowns. Choose Procore or Buildxact when revision governance must stay connected to project records or field changes.
Expecting drag-and-drop takeoff behavior from estimation-first products
Sage Estimating is estimation-centric and can feel less drag-and-drop for takeoff beginners. For calculator-first takeoff conversion, STACK Estimating provides structured quantity to priced line-item conversion.
Ignoring setup effort for template-driven workflows
eSUB Construction and Sage Estimating require deliberate time to set up templates and estimating structures that standardize bids. Knowify and STACK Estimating also require careful item structure design when advanced cost models or calculator logic must map cleanly to the estimator’s method.
Leaving operational constraints like equipment availability out of the quoting workflow
Booqable avoids this mistake by driving quote creation from equipment availability and scheduling constraints. Tools that focus on general line-item quoting without inventory-aware logic can force process workarounds when equipment constraints matter.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
we evaluated every tool on three sub-dimensions using a weighted average. Features carried weight 0.40, ease of use carried weight 0.30, and value carried weight 0.30. The overall rating equals 0.40 × features + 0.30 × ease of use + 0.30 × value. Sage Estimating separated itself from lower-ranked tools by combining estimating templates and structured cost breakdowns with revision-aware quote outputs, which strengthens features alignment for teams that need traceable, repeatable quoting.
Frequently Asked Questions About Building Quoting Software
How do Sage Estimating and STACK Estimating differ in takeoff-to-quote structure?
Sage Estimating uses structured line-item estimating with trade and labor structures plus project templates to keep bids consistent across revisions. STACK Estimating emphasizes calculator-driven estimating that maps takeoff quantities into priced line items, which helps standardize assemblies and reduce manual rework.
Which tools support quote variations and revision control during the estimating lifecycle?
Buildxact is built around quote versioning and variation handling tied to a single project record. Sage Estimating also supports change-aware estimating so revisions remain traceable through disciplined quoting outputs.
What software best fits equipment-aware quoting workflows with availability constraints?
Booqable connects quoting to equipment availability by using an equipment-and-scheduling flow that stays in step with estimate creation. That design keeps customer-facing proposals aligned with stock and calendar constraints, unlike tools focused purely on cost data.
How do Procore and eSUB Construction handle traceability between bid inputs and project execution?
Procore links quoting inputs to field execution data through a shared project platform, so commitments, RFIs, and cost tracking stay connected and reduce mismatched numbers. eSUB Construction focuses on subcontractor-oriented estimating and bid management that ties trade work pricing to project documents and scopes for controlled quote outputs.
Which platform is strongest for standardizing client-ready quote documents for repeat residential or light commercial scopes?
Buildxact targets home builders and renovators with fast, repeatable quote documents driven by structured templates and automated estimation steps. Knowify also prioritizes reusable templates and standardized scope language so proposal versions keep the same estimating line-item breakdowns.
Which tools connect quoting with project status tracking and invoicing workflows?
Jobber links quotes to jobs with client approvals, project status updates, and invoicing in one workflow so quoting stays aligned with fulfillment. invoicera focuses specifically on quote-to-invoice conversion, turning approved quote line items into billable invoices.
What is the key difference between quoting for general contractors and quoting for subcontractors?
Procore is geared toward general contractors that need quote-to-project traceability across teams, with commitments and document control tied to execution. eSUB Construction is tailored to subcontractors, using takeoff, quoting, and bid management designed around trade work and template-driven line items.
How do teams typically reduce rework caused by mismatched scope language or inconsistent line items?
Sage Estimating and eSUB Construction both use templates and structured cost breakdowns to keep line-item estimating disciplined across projects. STACK Estimating and Knowify reduce rework by converting structured takeoff quantities into priced line items via calculators or reusable template logic that standardizes what gets quoted.
Which tool supports a lighter operational layer around sales documents without deep bid analytics?
Contractor Foreman centers projects as the hub for quote and proposal building, line-item estimating, and job tracking tied to ongoing work. Its reporting focuses on project and quote outcomes rather than deep bid analytics, which suits teams that want sales-to-operations linkage without heavy bid modeling.
What common setup tasks help teams get started with a repeatable quoting workflow in these tools?
Sage Estimating and eSUB Construction both benefit from configuring project templates that define repeatable line items and structures before starting bids. Buildxact, Knowify, and Jobber improve repeatability by setting up quote templates and version workflows so estimator inputs, scope fields, and client-ready outputs stay consistent from one job to the next.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 sales, Sage Estimating stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
Tools reviewed
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Sales alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of sales tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare sales tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.