GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Employment WorkforceTop 10 Best Automatic Rostering Software of 2026
Compare the top 10 Automatic Rostering Software picks for 2026, including When I Work, 7shifts, and Deputy. Explore the best match.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
When I Work
Availability-based auto-scheduling with recurring shift rules and conflict checking
Built for workforce teams needing fast automated shift rosters with self-service workflows.
7shifts
Smart scheduling that generates coverage from availability, labor goals, and staff constraints
Built for restaurant and retail teams needing fast automated schedules with shift swap control.
Deputy
Scheduling rules that generate shifts from availability, roles, and labor demand constraints
Built for operations teams needing automated rosters with approvals and integrated attendance.
Related reading
Comparison Table
This comparison table evaluates automatic rostering software used for employee scheduling across common workforce tools such as When I Work, 7shifts, Deputy, ZoomShift, and Humanity. It summarizes how each platform handles shift creation, availability management, swap approvals, and assignment rules so teams can compare functionality and operational fit quickly.
| # | Tool | Category | Overall | Features | Ease of Use | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | When I Work Schedules employees with role coverage rules and supports automated or bulk shift creation with swap and approval workflows. | SMB scheduling | 8.4/10 | 8.6/10 | 8.8/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 2 | 7shifts Builds shift schedules for multi-location teams with labor controls and automated scheduling features for restaurant workforce staffing. | restaurant staffing | 8.1/10 | 8.4/10 | 8.2/10 | 7.5/10 |
| 3 | Deputy Generates and manages employee rosters with scheduling automation, shift approvals, and timesheet-driven labor visibility. | workforce management | 8.1/10 | 8.5/10 | 7.8/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 4 | ZoomShift Creates employee rosters with automated scheduling logic and supports shift swaps, time tracking, and rule-based staffing. | shift scheduling | 8.1/10 | 8.5/10 | 8.0/10 | 7.8/10 |
| 5 | Humanity Plans and automates employee scheduling with rostering tools that link to timesheets and absence management. | automation-first | 8.0/10 | 8.2/10 | 7.8/10 | 8.1/10 |
| 6 | Workplan Optimizes employee schedules using automated rostering approaches and constraint-based staffing for shift-based teams. | optimization | 7.7/10 | 8.0/10 | 7.2/10 | 7.8/10 |
| 7 | Crewmeister Schedules employees and automates roster creation with availability management and shift planning for hospitality and operations. | hospitality rosters | 8.0/10 | 8.3/10 | 7.6/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 8 | Optimo Route Assists with workforce scheduling and route-aligned shift planning with operational constraints for dispatch and rosters. | operations scheduling | 7.9/10 | 8.3/10 | 7.2/10 | 8.0/10 |
| 9 | UKG Pro Provides employee scheduling capabilities with automation-friendly workforce management workflows for shift staffing. | enterprise workforce | 8.0/10 | 8.3/10 | 7.6/10 | 8.1/10 |
| 10 | Infor Workforce Management Delivers workforce scheduling and labor management features that enable automated or guided roster planning under constraints. | enterprise suite | 7.4/10 | 7.6/10 | 6.8/10 | 7.7/10 |
Schedules employees with role coverage rules and supports automated or bulk shift creation with swap and approval workflows.
Builds shift schedules for multi-location teams with labor controls and automated scheduling features for restaurant workforce staffing.
Generates and manages employee rosters with scheduling automation, shift approvals, and timesheet-driven labor visibility.
Creates employee rosters with automated scheduling logic and supports shift swaps, time tracking, and rule-based staffing.
Plans and automates employee scheduling with rostering tools that link to timesheets and absence management.
Optimizes employee schedules using automated rostering approaches and constraint-based staffing for shift-based teams.
Schedules employees and automates roster creation with availability management and shift planning for hospitality and operations.
Assists with workforce scheduling and route-aligned shift planning with operational constraints for dispatch and rosters.
Provides employee scheduling capabilities with automation-friendly workforce management workflows for shift staffing.
Delivers workforce scheduling and labor management features that enable automated or guided roster planning under constraints.
When I Work
SMB schedulingSchedules employees with role coverage rules and supports automated or bulk shift creation with swap and approval workflows.
Availability-based auto-scheduling with recurring shift rules and conflict checking
When I Work stands out for scheduling automation built around shift templates, availability rules, and recurring rosters that update as staffing changes. The tool supports employee self-service for time-off requests and availability, then uses policy-based scheduling to fill shifts without manual rekeying. Core functionality also includes shift swaps, approvals, conflict checks, and manager notifications tied to schedule changes.
Pros
- Automated scheduling based on availability and recurring shift rules
- Employee self-service supports time-off requests and reduces manager admin
- Swap and coverage workflows help maintain rosters without manual chasing
- Schedule conflict visibility helps prevent double-booking and rule violations
Cons
- Automation depends heavily on clean inputs and accurate employee availability
- Complex scheduling policies may require more manual adjustments than expected
- Reporting depth for scheduling analytics can lag specialized workforce suites
Best For
Workforce teams needing fast automated shift rosters with self-service workflows
More related reading
7shifts
restaurant staffingBuilds shift schedules for multi-location teams with labor controls and automated scheduling features for restaurant workforce staffing.
Smart scheduling that generates coverage from availability, labor goals, and staff constraints
7shifts stands out with schedule creation built around staff availability, preferences, and labor targets for hourly workforces. It automates shift generation and makes staffing adjustments with an interface designed for managers to review changes quickly. Core capabilities include drag and drop editing, role and skill alignment, time-off handling, and shift swapping workflows. Reporting supports planning decisions with labor and staffing visibility across locations.
Pros
- Automated rostering uses availability and preferences to reduce manual scheduling work
- Role-based shift matching helps keep the right staff on the right tasks
- Built-in swap and request flows reduce scheduling interruptions
Cons
- Advanced edge-case constraints can require more manual intervention
- Multi-location standardization can take setup to stay consistent across teams
- Planning insights depend on accurate inputs like availability and labor targets
Best For
Restaurant and retail teams needing fast automated schedules with shift swap control
Deputy
workforce managementGenerates and manages employee rosters with scheduling automation, shift approvals, and timesheet-driven labor visibility.
Scheduling rules that generate shifts from availability, roles, and labor demand constraints
Deputy stands out by combining automated scheduling with workforce management features like shift approvals, time and attendance, and leave tracking in one system. It supports rule-based shift building from configurable constraints such as availability, roles, skills, and labor needs. The software can reduce manual roster creation by generating schedules and routing them through review and publishing workflows for managers.
Pros
- Rule-based scheduling handles availability, roles, and skill constraints
- Shift approvals and publishing workflows reduce scheduling churn
- Built-in time and attendance integration helps keep rosters consistent
Cons
- Complex constraint setups can slow initial configuration
- Managing edge cases like exceptions requires more manual oversight
- Advanced scheduling behaviors can feel less transparent than spreadsheets
Best For
Operations teams needing automated rosters with approvals and integrated attendance
More related reading
ZoomShift
shift schedulingCreates employee rosters with automated scheduling logic and supports shift swaps, time tracking, and rule-based staffing.
Constraint-based shift assignment with automated coverage when availability changes
ZoomShift stands out for visual scheduling workflows that help teams build rosters around shifts, availability, and role constraints. It supports recurring schedules, shift assignment rules, and automated coverage for typical staffing scenarios like absence and overtime planning. Teams can manage approvals and communicate roster changes through its scheduling interface.
Pros
- Visual roster building speeds up shift setup without complex configuration
- Rule-based assignment supports coverage planning around availability constraints
- Recurring schedules reduce repetitive manual work across future rosters
- Approval workflows help keep changes controlled and auditable
Cons
- Complex constraint sets can require careful rule tuning for expected outcomes
- Advanced reporting depth for forecasting needs may be limited versus niche tools
- Large multi-location scenarios can feel harder to manage than single-site setups
Best For
Workforces needing rule-based rosters with visual scheduling and controlled approvals
Humanity
automation-firstPlans and automates employee scheduling with rostering tools that link to timesheets and absence management.
Rule-based shift generation that assigns coverage across rosters
Humanity focuses on automated workforce scheduling workflows that connect shift planning with team management and HR data. The software supports rule-based rostering, change management, and shift assignment processes designed to reduce manual planning effort. Collaboration features like shift publishing and employee visibility aim to speed up approvals and updates while keeping schedules consistent.
Pros
- Rule-driven rostering reduces manual shift planning effort
- Scheduling changes flow into day-to-day team workflows
- Employee-facing schedule visibility improves update speed
Cons
- Complex constraint setups can be harder to model correctly
- Limited visibility into optimization logic for troubleshooting
Best For
Operations teams needing automated shift planning with team-facing collaboration
Workplan
optimizationOptimizes employee schedules using automated rostering approaches and constraint-based staffing for shift-based teams.
Constraint-based automatic rostering that generates shift schedules from availability and coverage rules
Workplan focuses on automated workforce rostering with configurable work rules for shifts, availability, and coverage targets. The core workflow supports generating schedules from constraints and iterating on drafts for managers to approve and publish. It also centralizes roster visibility and updates so changes propagate across the scheduling view.
Pros
- Constraint-driven roster generation reduces manual shift planning time
- Draft-to-approval workflow supports manager review of schedule outcomes
- Centralized roster visibility helps teams stay aligned on upcoming shifts
Cons
- Constraint setup can take multiple iterations to match real policies
- Complex scheduling scenarios may require administrative oversight
- Limited evidence of deep workforce analytics compared with specialist tools
Best For
Operations teams needing constraint-based shift scheduling and manager approval workflows
More related reading
Crewmeister
hospitality rostersSchedules employees and automates roster creation with availability management and shift planning for hospitality and operations.
Automated roster generation using staffing rules, constraints, and availability inputs
Crewmeister focuses on automating crew scheduling with rule-driven roster generation instead of manual shift swapping. It supports planning across workforces with availability inputs, constraint handling, and role-based assignments for coverage. The system centers on operational workflows with scheduling oversight and updates as plans change. Teams typically use it to reduce planning time and minimize staffing shortfalls through automated suggestions.
Pros
- Rule-based roster generation reduces manual scheduling effort
- Constraint-aware assignments help maintain coverage and role requirements
- Central scheduling workflow supports quick updates when availability changes
- Visibility into rosters improves operational planning and handover clarity
Cons
- Complex rules can be difficult to model without careful setup
- Roster changes may require more administrative touchpoints for edge cases
- User onboarding can feel slower for teams new to automated scheduling
Best For
Operations teams needing automated rosters with constraints and role coverage
Optimo Route
operations schedulingAssists with workforce scheduling and route-aligned shift planning with operational constraints for dispatch and rosters.
Constraint-based automatic scheduling that optimizes roster feasibility under availability and time windows
Optimo Route stands out by focusing on automatic staff and job scheduling using constraint-based routing logic rather than manual rule chains. The core capability centers on creating rosters that respect availability, preferences, skills, and time windows across multiple jobs. It also supports iterative rescheduling as constraints change, so operations can update schedules quickly without rebuilding the full plan. Output can be shared as schedules for dispatch and workforce coordination rather than just route maps.
Pros
- Constraint-driven rostering handles availability, skills, and time windows effectively
- Supports rescheduling when constraints change without recreating schedules
- Works well for multi-job coverage planning across distributed locations
Cons
- Setup of constraints can be complex for teams with irregular rules
- Less suited for ad hoc one-off roster adjustments than planned workflows
- Integration and data preparation effort can slow early adoption
Best For
Operations teams needing constraint-aware automatic rostering across complex job schedules
More related reading
UKG Pro
enterprise workforceProvides employee scheduling capabilities with automation-friendly workforce management workflows for shift staffing.
Scheduling and labor rules driven by workforce data with approval-driven roster workflow
UKG Pro stands out for combining workforce management and human resources data into one system that can drive automated scheduling decisions. It supports rule-based scheduling workflows, shift planning, and labor management needs for multi-location environments. The roster outputs align with timekeeping, staffing, and approvals so schedules can be updated when real attendance data changes. Automation is geared toward operational control with configurable rules rather than standalone, one-purpose roster optimization.
Pros
- Unified workforce and HR data supports scheduling that reflects real employment rules
- Configurable scheduling workflows support approvals, labor rules, and controlled updates
- Integration with time and attendance helps schedules respond to actual clock data
- Scales across locations with centralized management and consistent scheduling governance
Cons
- Setup and rule configuration require process discipline and experienced admin oversight
- Advanced scheduling outcomes depend heavily on how labor rules are modeled
- Day-to-day usability can feel heavy for teams needing simple, fast roster edits
Best For
Enterprises needing controlled automated rosters tied to timekeeping and HR rules
Infor Workforce Management
enterprise suiteDelivers workforce scheduling and labor management features that enable automated or guided roster planning under constraints.
Constraint-based scheduling rules that enforce coverage, labor, and qualification requirements
Infor Workforce Management stands out for combining scheduling and workforce planning with enterprise HR and operations data models. It supports constraint-based rostering with rules for coverage, labor laws, and skill or role requirements. It also includes workforce analytics and forecasting inputs that can drive staffing decisions before schedules are finalized.
Pros
- Constraint-driven rostering rules for coverage and labor compliance
- Works with broader workforce planning and forecasting inputs
- Supports multi-skill and role-based scheduling logic
- Analytics help validate staffing and adherence after rollout
Cons
- Setup and rule modeling can be complex for smaller operations
- User experience can feel heavy compared with purpose-built rostering tools
- Customization depth may require specialized configuration support
Best For
Enterprises needing constraint-heavy rostering integrated with workforce planning
How to Choose the Right Automatic Rostering Software
This buyer’s guide explains how to choose automatic rostering software using concrete capabilities found across When I Work, 7shifts, Deputy, ZoomShift, Humanity, Workplan, Crewmeister, Optimo Route, UKG Pro, and Infor Workforce Management. It covers must-have features like availability-based scheduling, constraint and labor controls, and approval workflows. It also highlights real selection pitfalls like complex rule setup and edge-case handling overhead.
What Is Automatic Rostering Software?
Automatic rostering software generates staff schedules from rules, constraints, and workforce inputs instead of manually building every shift. It reduces scheduling rework by using availability, preferences, roles, skills, and labor demand to create coverage and then routing schedules through review and publishing workflows. Tools like When I Work automate recurring shift creation using availability rules and conflict checking, while UKG Pro uses workforce and HR data to drive scheduling that ties into approvals and timekeeping. Typical users include operations and HR teams that manage shift-based coverage across locations with frequent changes.
Key Features to Look For
The best automatic rostering tools combine rule-based generation with controlled change workflows so schedules stay feasible when availability and labor needs shift.
Availability-based auto-scheduling with recurring shift rules
Look for tools that generate coverage from employee availability and support recurring scheduling rules so future rosters update without rebuilding. When I Work provides availability-based auto-scheduling with recurring shift rules and conflict checking, and ZoomShift supports recurring schedules plus constraint-based coverage when availability changes.
Constraint-based shift generation using labor demand, roles, and skills
Choose software that can treat labor targets and workforce qualification requirements as first-class constraints during generation. 7shifts uses availability, preferences, and labor targets to generate shifts, and Deputy builds schedules from configurable constraints like roles, skills, and labor needs.
Shift approvals and publish workflows for controlled roster changes
Automatic generation should not skip review. Deputy, ZoomShift, and Workplan route generated schedules through draft-to-approval and publishing workflows to keep roster changes auditable and controlled.
Employee self-service for availability and time-off visibility
For teams that want fewer scheduling pings, employee self-service reduces manager admin by collecting availability and time-off inputs. When I Work supports employee self-service for time-off requests and availability, and Humanity provides employee-facing schedule visibility to speed up collaboration on updates.
Shift swapping workflows with conflict checks
Swap workflows matter because most real schedules change after initial generation. 7shifts and When I Work include swap and request flows, and When I Work adds schedule conflict visibility to prevent rule violations like double-booking.
Multi-location planning and rescheduling under changing constraints
If operations span multiple jobs or locations, the tool should handle distributed coverage and iterative rescheduling without forcing a full rebuild. Optimo Route focuses on multi-job coverage with availability, skills, and time windows plus rescheduling when constraints change, while UKG Pro scales governed scheduling across locations using centralized management and labor rules.
How to Choose the Right Automatic Rostering Software
The selection process should map business rules and scheduling workflows to each tool’s specific constraint engine, collaboration model, and operational fit.
Map scheduling constraints to the tool’s rule engine
List the real constraints that create coverage problems such as availability, roles, skills, labor demand, and time windows. Deputy is built for rule-based scheduling from availability plus roles, skills, and labor needs, while Infor Workforce Management enforces coverage, labor compliance, and qualification requirements as constraint-driven rules.
Validate the change workflow from draft to approval to publishing
Automatic schedules need a review path so managers can control edits before rosters go out. Workplan supports draft-to-approval workflows for manager review and publishing, and ZoomShift includes approval workflows that keep changes controlled and auditable.
Test real scheduling edits like swaps and exception handling
Run a scenario with planned coverage plus at least one exception such as a swap request or an absence after generation. When I Work pairs swap and approval workflows with schedule conflict visibility, and 7shifts adds shift swapping workflows and drag-and-drop editing for managers to handle edge cases.
Check whether the tool integrates scheduling with timekeeping and attendance
If scheduling accuracy depends on real clock data, prioritize tools that connect rosters to time and attendance. Deputy integrates built-in time and attendance integration to keep rosters consistent, and UKG Pro ties scheduling outputs into timekeeping and approvals so schedules can update when real attendance data changes.
Match the deployment complexity to operational setup capacity
Rule-based automation can require careful constraint setup for predictable outcomes. ZoomShift and Workplan use constraint tuning for expected results, while Crewmeister and Humanity emphasize rule-driven generation that still benefits from careful setup to model complex rules correctly.
Who Needs Automatic Rostering Software?
Automatic rostering software fits teams that repeatedly generate and revise shift schedules under labor, role, and availability constraints.
Fast-moving hourly workforces that need availability-based automation plus self-service inputs
When I Work is built for fast automated shift rosters using availability-based auto-scheduling with recurring shift rules and conflict checking. It also supports employee self-service for time-off requests and availability to reduce manager administrative chasing.
Restaurant and retail teams that need coverage from availability and labor targets with swap control
7shifts generates smart schedules from availability, preferences, and labor goals while using role-based shift matching to align staff to tasks. It also includes drag-and-drop editing and built-in swap and request flows so scheduling interruptions can be managed inside the same system.
Operations teams that require automated roster generation with approvals and attendance alignment
Deputy combines scheduling automation with shift approvals plus time and attendance integration so rosters stay consistent with workforce records. Workflows include configurable constraints for availability, roles, and labor needs, then routing through review and publishing.
Enterprises that need governed, multi-location scheduling tied to HR rules and labor governance
UKG Pro unifies workforce and HR data to drive scheduling decisions and supports approval-driven roster workflows across locations. Infor Workforce Management supports constraint-heavy rostering integrated with workforce planning and analytics that validate adherence after rollout.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Several implementation patterns repeatedly cause friction across these tools even when automation works on day one.
Entering incomplete or inaccurate availability and time-off inputs
When I Work automation depends on clean inputs and accurate employee availability, and 7shifts planning insights depend on accurate availability and labor targets. Bad inputs lead to coverage gaps and extra manual adjustments in recurring schedules.
Overbuilding complex constraints without testing edge cases early
Deputy, ZoomShift, and Humanity all require careful constraint setup for predictable scheduling behavior because complex constraint setups can slow configuration and complicate troubleshooting. Running a limited pilot with real exceptions like swaps and absences helps reduce later manual oversight.
Ignoring the approval and publishing workflow until the last step
Tools like Workplan and ZoomShift support controlled approvals and publishing, and skipping that path can create uncontrolled schedule churn. Using the approval workflow from the first generated drafts keeps roster changes auditable.
Expecting one-off ad hoc edits to be effortless in constraint-heavy planning tools
Optimo Route is optimized for planned workflows and iterative rescheduling, and it is less suited for ad hoc one-off roster adjustments. Teams that need frequent freestyle micro-edits may find that constraint modeling and data preparation effort increases early adoption time.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated every tool on three sub-dimensions. Features received a weight of 0.4. Ease of use received a weight of 0.3. Value received a weight of 0.3. The overall score is computed as overall = 0.40 × features + 0.30 × ease of use + 0.30 × value. When I Work separated itself because its automation combines availability-based auto-scheduling with recurring shift rules, employee self-service, and conflict checking, which strengthened both the features dimension and day-to-day operational usability.
Frequently Asked Questions About Automatic Rostering Software
Which automatic rostering software best handles recurring shift templates and availability-based scheduling?
When I Work is built around shift templates plus availability rules, so recurring rosters update as staffing changes without manual rekeying. It also includes shift swaps, approvals, and conflict checks tied to schedule changes.
What tool is strongest for hourly workforces that need automated schedules based on labor targets and staff constraints?
7shifts generates schedules from staff availability, preferences, and labor targets, then lets managers review and adjust changes quickly. It supports role and skill alignment, time-off handling, and shift swapping workflows with coverage visibility.
Which platforms combine automated scheduling with approvals and time and attendance in one system?
Deputy unifies automated scheduling with shift approvals plus time and attendance and leave tracking. It routes rule-based shifts through manager review and publishing workflows based on configurable constraints like availability, roles, skills, and labor demand.
Which software is best when teams want visual, rule-driven scheduling with controlled approvals?
ZoomShift focuses on visual scheduling workflows with recurring schedules and constraint-based assignment rules. It supports approvals and communication of roster changes directly in the scheduling interface.
Which option fits organizations that need schedule change management and team collaboration with HR-linked data?
Humanity centers rule-based rostering with collaboration workflows for publishing and employee visibility. It connects shift planning with team management and HR data so changes stay consistent across rosters and approvals.
How do constraint-based rostering tools handle coverage when availability changes mid-cycle?
Workplan generates schedules from constraints and iterates drafts for manager approval and publishing, so updated availability can propagate through the scheduling view. Crewmeister also uses rule-driven roster generation so updates can minimize manual planning and reduce shortfalls.
Which software is designed for complex job scheduling across multiple locations with time windows and rescheduling?
Optimo Route uses constraint-based routing logic to create rosters that respect availability, preferences, skills, and time windows across complex jobs. It supports iterative rescheduling so operations can update plans without rebuilding the entire schedule.
Which platform suits enterprise teams that require automated scheduling tied to labor management and HR rules?
UKG Pro combines workforce management with HR data and drives scheduling decisions through configurable rules. It aligns roster outputs with timekeeping, staffing, and approval workflows so schedules update when attendance data changes.
Which option enforces labor law and qualification constraints while still supporting workforce planning analytics?
Infor Workforce Management supports constraint-based rostering that enforces coverage, labor laws, and skill or role requirements. It also includes workforce analytics and forecasting inputs to guide staffing decisions before schedules are finalized.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 employment workforce, When I Work stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
Tools reviewed
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Employment Workforce alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of employment workforce tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare employment workforce tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.