
GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Business Process OutsourcingTop 10 Best Automatic Minute Taking Software of 2026
Top 10 Automatic Minute Taking Software ranking compares Scribe, Fireflies.ai, and Otter.ai for meeting notes, accuracy, and workflows.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Scribe
Auto-generated meeting minutes from recorded sessions with editable, timestamped drafts
Built for teams needing fast, consistent meeting minutes with minimal editing and strong context capture.
Fireflies.ai
Editor pickAutomatic generation of summaries and action items from live meeting transcripts
Built for teams needing automated minutes and action items from recurring meetings.
Otter.ai
Editor pickReal-time transcription with automatic meeting summaries and key action items
Built for teams needing accurate meeting transcription with usable summaries and action items.
Related reading
Comparison Table
This comparison table maps automatic minute taking tools across integration depth, data model, and automation plus API surface for capturing and structuring meeting notes. It also highlights admin and governance controls such as RBAC, provisioning, audit logs, and configuration options that affect rollout and governance. Readers can use these dimensions to assess fit for their meeting capture workflow and extensibility requirements without relying on feature lists.
Scribe
documentation captureScribe captures screen activity and turns it into step-by-step documentation, which can serve as the basis for meeting minutes in business workflows.
Auto-generated meeting minutes from recorded sessions with editable, timestamped drafts
Scribe stands out for turning live meetings into shareable minutes with guided, click-by-click documentation. Auto-capture converts voice and on-screen context into a structured draft minutes document with timestamps and clear sections.
Editing is fast because the output is editable text plus embedded visuals, so teams can correct wording without rebuilding the minutes from scratch. The workflow supports consistent formatting across recurring meeting types and departments.
- +Auto-generates meeting minutes from captured sessions with structured sections
- +Produces editable drafts with timestamps for quick review and correction
- +Tight integration with screen and voice context reduces manual transcription work
- +Reuses consistent templates to standardize minutes across recurring meetings
- –Best results depend on stable capture setup and clear speaking
- –Long meetings can require more cleanup for accuracy and wording
- –Highly customized minute formats may take more manual adjustment
Customer success teams
Weekly account sync minutes from live calls
Quicker action tracking and summaries
Project managers
Agile standup minutes with decisions and blockers
Consistent decision and blocker logs
Show 1 more scenario
Legal operations teams
Contract review meeting minutes with evidence
Audit-ready meeting documentation
Voice and screen context become editable minutes that attach supporting visuals for audits.
Best for: Teams needing fast, consistent meeting minutes with minimal editing and strong context capture
More related reading
Fireflies.ai
AI meeting transcriptionFireflies.ai records meetings, transcribes audio, and generates searchable meeting notes and minutes from calls.
Automatic generation of summaries and action items from live meeting transcripts
Fireflies.ai stands out with automated meeting capture that turns spoken discussion into searchable minutes. It supports meeting transcription from common conferencing sources and produces summaries, action items, and follow-up notes tied to the spoken content.
The platform also enables knowledge capture by extracting key themes and allowing users to review transcripts later with quick search. Collaboration is handled through shared meeting outputs that teams can reference without rewatching recordings.
- +Accurate transcription that supports fast review and keyword search.
- +Action items and summaries are generated directly from meeting audio.
- +Integrates with popular conferencing workflows to reduce manual capture effort.
- +Organizes meeting outputs into reusable records for teams.
- –Summaries can miss nuance in fast or highly technical discussions.
- –Formatting of action items sometimes requires additional cleanup.
- –Searching across large meeting libraries can feel slower than expected.
Sales teams and sales ops
Turn discovery calls into searchable CRM notes
Faster follow-up and cleaner records
Customer support and team leads
Convert support calls into action item briefs
Reduced repeat tickets
Show 2 more scenarios
Product managers and UX leads
Document user interviews with themes and tasks
Quicker product decision notes
Extracted themes and searchable transcripts speed synthesis across interview sessions.
Engineering teams and tech leads
Capture standups into shared execution notes
Clear accountability across teams
Meeting outputs list decisions and action items for engineering execution and review.
Best for: Teams needing automated minutes and action items from recurring meetings
Otter.ai
meeting notesOtter.ai transcribes live meetings and converts transcripts into organized notes suitable for automated minute taking.
Real-time transcription with automatic meeting summaries and key action items
Otter.ai acts as an automatic minute taking tool by pairing real-time transcription with a notes editor built around meeting artifacts like summaries, key points, and action items. The editor works with both recorded audio and uploaded files, which supports review and cleanup after a meeting ends. Meeting history stays searchable through transcripts, so teams can retrieve decisions without manually scanning documents.
A tradeoff is that meeting structure quality depends on audio conditions such as speaker separation and background noise, which can affect how clearly action items and key points are extracted. It fits situations where teams need consistent meeting records across recurring calls, like weekly customer syncs, and where shared transcripts must be usable for follow-ups and documentation handoff.
- +Real-time transcription that stays readable during spoken discussion
- +Automatic summaries and action items reduce manual note cleanup
- +Searchable meeting history helps teams find past decisions quickly
- +Editing and formatting tools make transcripts usable without extra software
- –Speaker labeling can degrade with overlapping speech
- –Action items need verification for accuracy and completeness
- –Transcripts and exports can require cleanup for long technical sessions
RevOps teams
Summarize weekly pipeline and process sync
Faster updates to CRM tasks
Legal operations teams
Turn intake calls into searchable minutes
Lower time finding prior decisions
Show 2 more scenarios
Customer success managers
Document renewal and escalation meetings
Clear ownership of follow-ups
Produces action items from meeting audio so teams track commitments across shared transcripts.
Engineering managers
Record design reviews and decisions
Reduced drift in meeting outcomes
Generates meeting summaries and extracted highlights from transcripts for decision documentation.
Best for: Teams needing accurate meeting transcription with usable summaries and action items
More related reading
Tactiq
AI meeting assistantTactiq transcribes meetings and produces structured notes that can be exported as minutes for teams.
Live meeting transcription with automatic summaries and action-item extraction
Tactiq stands out with meeting-to-notes automation that converts live discussion into structured minutes. It captures spoken content from video calls, then surfaces action items and summaries tied to the meeting flow.
The workflow centers on editing and exporting transcripts as meeting records for shared documentation. Minute taking is strongest when teams want low-friction capture directly from conferencing sessions.
- +Accurate transcript generation from live meetings with usable summaries
- +Action item extraction supports faster post-meeting follow-up
- +Editing tools make transcripts practical for finalized minutes
- +Works well for recurring meeting documentation workflows
- –Minute formatting requires cleanup for highly structured templates
- –Action items can miss nuance when decisions are implied
- –Output quality depends on audio clarity and speaker separation
Best for: Teams needing automated meeting minutes from video calls with quick summaries
Fathom
call summarizationFathom records calls, generates transcripts, and creates summaries that can be used as meeting minutes.
Highlights and searchable summaries generated directly from recorded meetings
Fathom distinguishes itself with browser-based recording that turns meetings into searchable summaries and action-oriented notes. It captures live audio during calls and generates minute-style transcripts with topic and speaker context.
Teams also get highlights that condense long discussions into scannable recaps without manual note typing. The workflow targets recurring meeting documentation where summaries must stay linked to the original recording.
- +Automatic transcripts with speaker attribution reduce manual cleanup during reviews
- +Action-oriented highlights make meeting recaps easier to scan than full transcripts
- +Searchable outputs speed up follow-up work across past calls
- +Recording and note generation stay in one streamlined capture workflow
- –Minutes quality depends heavily on audio clarity and participant speaking overlap
- –Editing and formatting options are limited compared with dedicated collaborative document tools
- –Less control over how summaries are structured for different meeting types
Best for: Sales and customer teams needing fast searchable meeting minutes
Verbit
speech-to-textVerbit provides AI-assisted speech-to-text with meeting-ready transcripts and captions that support minutes generation.
Speaker-attributed transcription with an editing workflow for publication-ready meeting transcripts
Verbit turns meetings into usable outputs by combining automatic speech-to-text with structured transcripts and review workflows. It supports speaker attribution and searchable transcripts that enable faster follow-up than plain recordings alone.
The tool focuses on accuracy and post-processing controls, which matters for regulated and compliance-heavy conversations. Teams can use exported transcripts and meeting artifacts to reduce manual transcription and note-taking effort.
- +High-accuracy transcription with strong speaker attribution for meeting readability
- +Review and editing workflows reduce errors before sharing transcripts
- +Exportable transcript artifacts support downstream documentation and search
- –Setup and workflow configuration can be heavy for smaller teams
- –Not as streamlined for one-click personal note taking as lighter tools
- –Review cycles may be required to reach publication-ready meeting minutes
Best for: Organizations needing accurate, speaker-attributed meeting transcripts with review controls
More related reading
Sonix
transcription platformSonix turns audio and video into accurate transcripts and searchable outputs that can be formatted into meeting minutes.
Speaker diarization with time-coded transcripts for meeting minute reconstruction
Sonix turns spoken meetings into searchable transcripts with time-stamped output and editable summaries. It supports automated diarization so multiple speakers can be separated in a single recording. The workflow centers on uploading audio or video, then using transcripts for minute-style notes, actions, and export-ready documents.
- +Fast transcription with timestamps that map cleanly to minute sections
- +Speaker diarization helps separate agenda items across multi-speaker calls
- +Exports transcripts and summaries into documents for sharing and review
- +Searchable transcript text speeds up locating decisions and action items
- –Summarization accuracy can degrade on domain jargon and heavy accents
- –Minute-style formatting needs manual cleanup for strict templates
- –Less control over meeting structure compared with dedicated note-taking tools
Best for: Teams needing automated transcript-based minutes for recurring meetings
Trint
AI transcriptionTrint transcribes recorded meetings and provides editing and export tools for converting transcripts into minute documents.
Time-coded transcript playback with inline editing
Trint stands out by turning recorded speech into searchable transcripts with strong formatting and quick editing workflows. It supports meeting-style audio ingestion and produces readable documents that can be reviewed, corrected, and shared.
Automated minute taking is driven by speech-to-text with time-coded playback so key moments can be located during edits. Exported transcripts help convert raw recordings into meeting minutes without heavy manual transcription work.
- +Time-coded transcripts make it easy to jump to exact moments during review
- +High-accuracy transcription supports fast editing for meeting documents
- +Exportable text and formatting speed up turning recordings into minutes
- +Collaboration tools support reviewing and refining transcripts for accuracy
- –Speaker attribution is not reliably perfect for messy audio and overlapping speech
- –Manual cleanup is still needed for industry terms and names
- –Long meetings can require more editing time than teams expect
Best for: Teams needing searchable, editable meeting minutes from audio recordings
More related reading
Happy Scribe
meeting transcriptionHappy Scribe automatically transcribes meeting recordings into text that teams can assemble into minutes.
Speaker diarization that improves minute readability by separating who said what
Happy Scribe stands out for turning meeting audio into searchable text with speaker-aware transcripts that can become minutes quickly. It supports multiple languages and provides tools to edit and refine the transcript output that minutes rely on. The workflow is strongest when minutes are driven by transcript accuracy and fast cleanup rather than heavy agenda-specific formatting.
- +Strong speech-to-text quality with speaker labeling for readable minutes
- +Fast editing tools for polishing transcript content into meeting minutes
- +Multi-language transcription supports global teams and cross-border meetings
- –Minutes formatting and templates are limited compared with minute-focused suites
- –Document outputs can require manual cleanup for action items and decisions
- –Agenda metadata and structured fields are not a primary workflow
Best for: Teams that need quick, transcript-driven minutes from recorded meetings
Zoom AI Companion
video-meeting suiteZoom AI Companion supports meeting transcription and summarization so meeting notes and minutes can be produced from Zoom recordings.
Meeting summaries and action items generated from Zoom recordings via Zoom AI Companion
Zoom AI Companion turns Zoom meeting audio into structured artifacts like meeting summaries and action items. It is tightly integrated with Zoom workflows, so it can capture context during live meetings and produce usable notes afterward.
It also supports conversation intelligence style outputs that help identify key topics and decisions from recorded sessions. The minute-taking experience is strongest for Zoom-centric teams that already run most work in Zoom.
- +Produces meeting summaries and action items directly from Zoom audio
- +Fits smoothly into Zoom meeting and recording workflows
- +Captures key topics to reduce manual note drafting
- –Best results depend on meeting audio quality and speaker clarity
- –Less effective for organizations standardizing on non-Zoom meeting sources
- –Limited control over note structure and formatting compared with dedicated note tools
Best for: Teams using Zoom who want automated minutes and action items
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 business process outsourcing, Scribe stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Automatic Minute Taking Software
This buyer's guide covers Automatic Minute Taking Software tools including Scribe, Fireflies.ai, Otter.ai, Tactiq, Fathom, Verbit, Sonix, Trint, Happy Scribe, and Zoom AI Companion. It focuses on integration depth, data model behavior, automation and API surface, and admin and governance controls.
Use this guide to map meeting capture inputs into minutes-style outputs with clear edit paths, search paths, and control paths. It also highlights where speaker attribution, formatting, and structured templates can break down across the listed tools.
Meeting audio and video to structured minutes workflows with automation and capture context
Automatic Minute Taking Software converts meeting audio or video into structured minutes artifacts that support review, search, and follow-up. These tools typically handle transcription, speaker labeling, and minute-style structuring so teams spend less time retyping decisions and action items.
Scribe uses auto-capture from recorded sessions to generate editable, timestamped minutes drafts with consistent sections, while Fireflies.ai generates summaries and action items directly from live meeting transcripts. This category fits teams that need repeatable meeting documentation across recurring calls, project check-ins, customer syncs, or Zoom-centric workflows.
Evaluation criteria for minute automation accuracy, structure, and control surfaces
Minute automation value depends on how the tool turns spoken content into a minutes-friendly structure and how edits map back to timestamped evidence. Scribe, Otter.ai, and Tactiq emphasize structured notes from meeting sessions, while Sonix and Trint emphasize time-coded transcripts that make correction faster.
Integration depth and governance matter because meeting minutes become shared records that need auditability, role-based access, and predictable admin configuration. Verbit adds heavier review and editing workflows for publication-ready outputs, while Zoom AI Companion ties output generation to Zoom meeting recordings for teams standardizing on Zoom.
Timestamped minutes drafts and editability anchored to capture
Scribe generates auto-generated meeting minutes with editable, timestamped drafts, which reduces rework when wording changes are needed. Sonix and Trint provide time-coded transcripts that make it faster to jump to exact moments during minute reconstruction.
Speaker diarization quality and readability under overlap
Otter.ai and Trint rely on speaker handling to keep transcripts usable for action items and decisions, and overlapping speech can degrade labeling. Sonix highlights speaker diarization for separating agenda items across multi-speaker calls, while Happy Scribe also uses diarization to improve minute readability.
Action items and summaries tied to transcript moments
Fireflies.ai and Otter.ai generate summaries and action items from live meeting transcripts, which shortens post-meeting follow-up. Tactiq and Fathom also produce action-oriented outputs from captured recordings, but minute formatting often requires cleanup when templates demand strict structure.
Integration depth into meeting sources and downstream collaboration
Zoom AI Companion produces meeting summaries and action items from Zoom recordings, which fits teams where most meetings run in Zoom. Fathom and Trint focus on searchable, editable outputs from recorded audio, which supports cross-call retrieval without rewatching.
Automation surface and API-first extensibility for workflows
Tools that expose documented automation and API surfaces make it possible to route minutes into existing systems like ticketing, document storage, and internal knowledge bases. In this set, Scribe is positioned around structured drafts and consistent templates, while Fireflies.ai centers on automated generation of summaries and action items that can be used as integration payloads.
Admin and governance controls for accuracy review and publication readiness
Verbit focuses on accuracy with an editing workflow intended for publication-ready meeting transcripts, which supports governance for compliance-heavy conversations. This category also needs configuration control so teams can prevent uncontrolled template drift and enforce review steps before minutes are shared.
A decision framework for selecting a minute automation tool that fits meeting inputs and governance needs
Start with meeting source and output structure, because each tool in this set optimizes a different path from capture to minutes. Scribe favors captured sessions that become editable, timestamped minutes drafts with consistent sections, while Zoom AI Companion favors Zoom recordings tied to structured summaries and action items.
Then validate the automation and control path by checking how edits, speaker attribution, and search behave at the scale of real meetings. Finally, confirm that admin workflows match the accuracy bar, including review cycles for regulated contexts like those emphasized by Verbit.
Match the tool to the meeting source and recording workflow
If most work happens in Zoom, Zoom AI Companion is the tightest fit because it generates meeting summaries and action items from Zoom recordings. If the goal is minutes built from recorded sessions with structured sections, choose Scribe since it auto-generates editable, timestamped minutes drafts from captured sessions.
Score transcript correctness using speaker labeling under real audio conditions
Otter.ai and Trint can experience speaker labeling degradation when overlapping speech occurs, which affects action item extraction. Sonix and Happy Scribe emphasize diarization to keep multi-speaker calls readable, which reduces cleanup time when minutes must be decision-accurate.
Verify that edits map back to evidence using time-coded playback
Trint provides time-coded transcript playback with inline editing, which supports fast correction during minutes finalization. Scribe also anchors edits to timestamped drafts, while Sonix supplies time-stamped transcripts that map to minute sections.
Check whether action items and summaries meet the minutes format requirement
Fireflies.ai and Otter.ai generate summaries and action items directly from live meeting transcripts, which reduces manual note assembly. If highly structured templates are required, validate formatting cleanup needs because multiple tools indicate that minute formatting can require additional cleanup for strict templates, including Tactiq and Sonix.
Plan governance around review cycles and export artifacts
For compliance-heavy work that needs review controls, Verbit emphasizes an editing workflow for publication-ready transcripts. For lighter governance, tools that focus on quick minutes drafting like Scribe still require stable capture setup and clear speaking to achieve best results.
Confirm the automation and integration surface for how minutes move into systems
When minutes must flow into existing knowledge and collaboration workflows, Fireflies.ai and Otter.ai are oriented around searchable meeting outputs, summaries, and action items tied to transcripts. When the workflow is document-first, Scribe’s structured drafts and embedded visuals make it easier to standardize minute outputs across recurring meeting types.
Teams and workflows that benefit from automatic minute taking automation
Automatic minute taking fits teams that repeatedly capture decisions, action items, and context from meetings and then need fast retrieval without scanning recordings. The best fit depends on whether minutes must be structured from the start or whether transcript-first workflows with later formatting are acceptable.
The audience below aligns to the best-fit guidance for each tool based on its stated strengths, including Scribe for structured minutes drafts, Otter.ai for real-time summaries and action items, and Zoom AI Companion for Zoom-centric capture.
Teams that need structured minutes drafts with minimal editing
Scribe is the strongest match because it auto-generates meeting minutes from captured sessions with structured sections and editable, timestamped drafts. This fits recurring meeting types and departments where consistent formatting reduces cleanup.
Teams running recurring meetings and needing action items from live transcripts
Fireflies.ai and Otter.ai generate summaries and action items directly from live meeting transcripts, which supports fast follow-up. Otter.ai adds real-time transcription with automatic summaries and key action items, which reduces the gap between meeting discussion and minutes output.
Video-call teams that want minute-style outputs during or right after meetings
Tactiq is suited to video calls because it produces live meeting transcription with automatic summaries and action-item extraction. This fits workflows that finalize minutes quickly after a call ends and rely on transcript editing tools for correction.
Organizations that require speaker-attributed transcripts with review controls
Verbit fits compliance-heavy conversations because it emphasizes high-accuracy, speaker-attributed transcription plus review and editing workflows. This is the best match when publication-ready transcripts must pass review cycles before sharing.
Zoom-first teams standardizing meeting capture inside Zoom
Zoom AI Companion fits teams that already run meetings and recordings in Zoom because it generates meeting summaries and action items from Zoom audio. This reduces the integration burden compared with tools designed around general audio or video ingestion.
Common failure modes when implementing minute automation from transcripts
Minute automation fails most often when teams assume the minutes output will be structurally correct without cleanup or when speaker attribution breaks during overlapping speech. Several tools also indicate that long technical sessions increase editing time even when transcription is accurate.
Other implementation failures happen when meeting format requirements are stricter than the tool’s minutes structuring approach, which leads to template drift and manual patching. These pitfalls show up across Scribe, Fireflies.ai, Otter.ai, Tactiq, Sonix, Trint, and Happy Scribe.
Treating summaries and action items as publication-ready minutes without verification
Otter.ai and Fireflies.ai generate action items and summaries, but action items can need verification for accuracy and completeness. Teams should run a review step that checks action items against time-coded transcript moments using tools like Trint or Sonix.
Expecting minute formatting to match strict templates on the first pass
Tactiq and Sonix note that minute formatting can require cleanup for highly structured templates. Scribe also flags that highly customized minute formats can require manual adjustment, so template complexity should be treated as a configuration variable, not a constant.
Ignoring speaker overlap effects on diarization and minutes reconstruction
Otter.ai and Trint can degrade speaker labeling with overlapping speech, which can corrupt speaker-attributed decisions. Sonix and Happy Scribe emphasize diarization to keep multi-speaker readability higher, so diarization behavior should be tested on real recordings.
Choosing a tool that cannot anchor edits to evidence for long meetings
Long meetings can require more cleanup across Scribe, Otter.ai, Sonix, and Trint, which increases the cost of editing without time-coded navigation. Trint’s time-coded transcript playback and Scribe’s timestamped drafts reduce rework during minutes finalization.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Scribe, Fireflies.ai, Otter.ai, Tactiq, Fathom, Verbit, Sonix, Trint, Happy Scribe, and Zoom AI Companion using their stated capabilities and practical workflow descriptions, then scored each tool on features, ease of use, and value. Features carried the most weight at 40%, while ease of use and value each accounted for 30% in the overall rating. The final ranking reflects criteria-based scoring across how minutes drafts and transcript artifacts behave in review workflows, how consistently structured outputs are generated, and how much cleanup is typically needed to reach minutes-ready quality.
Scribe set itself apart by generating auto-generated meeting minutes with structured sections and editable, timestamped drafts, which directly raised the features score and reduced editing friction compared with transcript-first or summary-first workflows.
Frequently Asked Questions About Automatic Minute Taking Software
Which tool is best for converting live meetings into structured minutes with minimal editing?
How do Scribe, Fireflies.ai, and Otter.ai differ in how action items and summaries are produced?
Which automatic minute taking options fit teams that run most meetings inside Zoom?
What integration and API capabilities are typically required to automate minutes across conferencing and document tools?
How do the tools handle speaker attribution and speaker diarization when audio has multiple participants?
Which tool is better for regulated conversations that need post-processing controls and review before sharing?
What technical requirement matters most for transcript quality and downstream minutes extraction?
How do these tools differ for video calls where capture is tied to the conferencing source rather than an uploaded file?
What data migration path is most realistic when moving from manual minutes documents to transcript-driven minutes?
What admin controls and governance features should teams look for when multiple departments collaborate on meeting outputs?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Business Process Outsourcing alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of business process outsourcing tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare business process outsourcing tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.
