GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Technology Digital MediaTop 10 Best Audio Video Mixer Software of 2026
Ranking roundup of top Audio Video Mixer Software tools with vMix, OBS Studio, Wirecast, plus tradeoffs for buyers comparing features.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
vMix
vMix Virtual Camera that exposes the mixer output as a virtual webcam feed
Built for live production operators mixing many inputs who need a camera-compatible output.
OBS Studio
Editor pickAudio filters per source with real-time monitoring and extensive mixer controls
Built for streamers and creators needing a robust mixer with customizable routing and filters.
Wirecast
Editor pickScene-based multiview and live switching with configurable overlays and transitions
Built for live broadcasters needing integrated audio video mixing, switching, and overlays.
Related reading
Comparison Table
The comparison table ranks top audio video mixer tools by integration depth, data model, and automation options through each product’s configuration surface and API behavior. It also contrasts governance controls like RBAC scope and audit log coverage, plus extensibility points that affect provisioning and repeatable deployments. Readers can map each tool’s throughput and schema choices to practical workflow and admin requirements without repeating the same checklist.
vMix Virtual Camera
integrationvMix Virtual Camera exposes vMix mixed output as a virtual camera feed so other apps can ingest the mixed audio-video stream.
vMix Virtual Camera that exposes the mixer output as a virtual webcam feed
vMix Virtual Camera stands out for turning vMix output into virtual camera feeds for conferencing and streaming workflows. It provides live production mixing with video and audio sources, real-time effects, and routing to network streams or capture applications. The workflow centers on comprehensive scene control with transitions and audio monitoring, while the virtual camera option enables easy reuse inside video software that accepts camera inputs.
- +Virtual camera output simplifies using vMix productions in conferencing tools
- +Deep mixing controls cover multi-source video and audio in one engine
- +Real-time effects and transitions support polished live switching
- –Complex control surface makes early setup and routing slower to learn
- –Audio monitoring and levels can require careful configuration for stability
- –Virtual camera integration depends on the host app’s capture behavior
Best for: Live production operators mixing many inputs who need a camera-compatible output
More related reading
OBS Studio
open-sourceOBS Studio is a cross-platform broadcast software that composites multiple audio and video inputs with scenes, filters, and real-time recording or streaming.
Audio filters per source with real-time monitoring and extensive mixer controls
OBS Studio stands out with its node-free, real-time scene and source mixer built for low-latency audio and video capture. It supports audio mixing with multiple input devices, per-source filters, and monitoring tools, alongside video sources such as webcams, capture cards, and windows.
The software enables live streaming and recording using configurable encoders and scene transitions. Extensive plugin and scripting support helps extend control workflows beyond basic mixing.
- +Scene and source mixing enables flexible live layouts quickly
- +Low-latency audio monitoring with filters like noise suppression and EQ
- +Powerful encoder control supports streaming and high-quality recording
- –Initial setup requires careful configuration of devices and sample rates
- –Advanced scene and audio routing can feel complex under time pressure
- –Large projects need disciplined source organization to avoid mistakes
Live streamers who need low-latency audio and video mixing on one machine
Mixing a webcam feed, screen capture, and multiple microphones into scenes for streaming with synchronized audio monitoring and scene transitions
A stable live broadcast with synchronized audio, predictable mix levels, and quick scene switching.
Content creators recording tutorials and gameplay sessions
Capturing window or display sources plus microphone narration, then recording with configurable encoders and clean transitions between scenes
Edit-ready footage that matches the on-screen composition and sound design without manual post-mix.
Show 2 more scenarios
Event operators and broadcast volunteers running a multi-source production booth
Coordinating capture cards, webcams, and system audio into a controlled output for live events using hotkey-driven scene switching
Lower operational risk during live events through repeatable scene layouts and real-time monitoring.
OBS Studio can ingest multiple input devices and capture sources, then apply per-source filters and monitoring to reduce errors during rehearsals and live runs. Scene transitions keep the output consistent across segments.
Technical users who automate streaming and media workflows with plugins and scripts
Using scripting and plugin extensions to control scene changes, audio levels, and device states based on external triggers
More consistent production workflows that require less manual operation during live sessions.
OBS Studio’s plugin and scripting support enables automation beyond manual mixing. External control can drive repeated scene behaviors and audio handling for recurring broadcasts.
Best for: Streamers and creators needing a robust mixer with customizable routing and filters
Wirecast
live streamingWirecast is a live streaming and multi-source video mixing application that adds transitions, overlays, and audio mixing for productions.
Scene-based multiview and live switching with configurable overlays and transitions
Wirecast stands out for real-time production control with direct support for multi-camera streaming and switching workflows. It combines live video mixing, audio mixing, scene control, and overlays into one broadcast-oriented mixing studio.
Users can route multiple inputs, apply transitions and effects, and deliver a configured program feed for recording or live streaming. The tool fits teams that need dependable live output with tight control over sources and timing.
- +Strong scene and source switching for live video and program mixing
- +Reliable audio and video input routing into a single output pipeline
- +Built-in overlays, transitions, and output monitoring for faster production control
- +Supports recording and live streaming workflows from the same studio layout
- –Advanced layouts can feel complex versus simpler mixer tools
- –Resource use can rise with multiple sources and effects running simultaneously
- –Customization beyond presets can require more setup and operator discipline
Independent streamers and solo producers running studio-style shows from a single workstation
Mixing multiple camera feeds into a single live program while controlling cuts, transitions, lower thirds, and synchronized audio levels during a weekly broadcast
A consistent, studio-style live stream with fewer manual errors during camera changes and overlay updates.
Event production teams delivering multi-camera coverage for live conferences and performances
Producing program output from several live camera inputs while applying transitions, managing scene-based overlays, and recording the final show for later distribution
Reliable coverage where the recorded and streamed versions match the live cut decisions made during the event.
Show 2 more scenarios
Corporate communications and internal AV staff streaming remote speakers and slide content
Running a hybrid session with a camera feed for speakers, audio from microphones, and on-screen graphics such as titles and segment cues
A repeatable live briefing workflow that produces clean on-air audio and consistent on-screen labeling.
Wirecast supports controlled program routing so speakers and graphics remain synchronized in the final output. It also centralizes audio and video mixing to reduce coordination steps between separate tools.
Sports and live broadcast operators who need fast live switching across cameras and replay-style inserts
Switching between multiple camera angles and inserting pre-built segments during play-by-play coverage while maintaining stable program timing
Lower-risk live edits during fast-paced moments where camera and audio changes must stay synchronized.
Wirecast supports scene switching and program output control so operators can change camera angles and overlays as the show progresses. It also includes audio mixing controls to prevent level swings when sources change.
Best for: Live broadcasters needing integrated audio video mixing, switching, and overlays
More related reading
XSplit Broadcaster
live streamingXSplit Broadcaster is a live video mixer for creating scenes that combine camera and media inputs with audio mixing, effects, and streaming.
Scene switching with integrated audio mixing and overlay rendering
XSplit Broadcaster stands out for its live scene workflow that combines audio and video sources into a single broadcast-ready canvas. It supports multi-scene switching, real-time overlays, and production-style controls for capturing and mixing.
Built-in audio mixing with filtering and monitoring makes it usable for live streaming and recording without extra DAW routing. The software’s power is strongest for Windows-based live production where a dedicated mixer and scene controller matter more than deep broadcast automation.
- +Scene-based audio and video mixing with rapid live transitions
- +Real-time overlays and capture sources suitable for streaming production
- +Audio monitoring and mixer controls support quick level management
- +Chroma-style customization and layout tools help create polished broadcasts
- –Advanced routing and multi-device setups take time to configure
- –CPU and GPU performance can limit effects at higher source counts
- –Automation and broadcast control features feel less production-system rich
- –Some workflow tasks require more manual setup than simpler mixers
Best for: Live Windows streamers needing fast scene mixing with audio control
Resolume Arena
VJ and live visualsResolume Arena is a live visual performance system that mixes video layers and routing while managing audio playback and synchronization.
Instant scene switching with beat-synced timing across multiple video layers
Resolume Arena stands out as a real-time VJ and live visual mixing engine built around layer-based composition and timeline-free control. It supports multi-layer video, effects, keying, and scene switching with beat-synced workflows that also connect cleanly to audio analysis. The tool also operates as a practical audio and video performance mixer through synchronized inputs, external control mapping, and responsive output routing for live stages.
- +Layered video engine with real-time effects tuned for live performance
- +Beat-synced control and audio-reactive options support tight audiovisual timing
- +Extensive external control mapping enables MIDI, OSC, and controller workflows
- –Audio mixing depth is limited compared with dedicated DAW or AVB tools
- –Complex projects can require careful scene and routing management
- –Learning curve rises when building advanced effect chains and mappings
Best for: Live performers needing real-time audiovisual mixing and scene control
Dataton WATCHOUT
multi-display show controlWATCHOUT is a multi-display show control system that mixes and plays coordinated audio-visual content across many screens.
Scalable multi-machine scene playback with frame-accurate synchronization
Dataton WATCHOUT stands out for real-time video wall presentation control that coordinates multiple computers, projectors, and media feeds. It functions as a show controller that drives synchronized playback, transitions, and blending across distributed AV systems. Audio mixing is typically handled through external audio processors or integrated audio pathways, while WATCHOUT focuses on scene timing, visuals, and cross-device synchronization.
- +Strong multi-computer show control with precise synchronization
- +Scene-based timelines support repeatable stage and exhibit workflows
- +Reliable video wall blending and edge overlap control
- –Audio mixing depth depends on external audio infrastructure
- –Setup complexity rises quickly with large distributed render nodes
- –Editing workflows can feel heavy compared with streaming-centric mixers
Best for: AV integrators building synchronized video wall shows with external audio routing
More related reading
QLab
show controlQLab is a control and playback system for interactive shows that synchronizes audio-visual playback and can blend media for performances.
Cue list show control with OSC and MIDI triggering for automated performance playback
QLab is distinguished by its cue-list driven show control that combines audio playback, timed transitions, and automation in one timeline style workflow. It supports multichannel audio mixing with real-time routing, fader-style mixing, and OSC and MIDI control for external triggers.
The software excels at building repeatable performance sequences using cues, groups, and macros that can coordinate sound, video playback, and system actions. Its core strength is reliability in stage environments, paired with fewer general-purpose mixing features than dedicated DAWs.
- +Cue lists automate complex sound sequences with precise timing
- +Strong OSC and MIDI integration enables hardware and control surface workflows
- +Live-safe playback includes robust pause, restart, and next-cue controls
- +Flexible routing supports multichannel setups beyond simple stereo playback
- –Cue-list logic can feel rigid for exploratory mixing sessions
- –Deep routing and device configuration require setup time
- –Built-in mixing lacks the advanced mixing tools found in DAWs
- –Large show projects can become harder to navigate without strict organization
Best for: Stage teams running cue-based audio and show control with external triggering
MA Lighting MediaMaster
media serverMediaMaster by MA Lighting is a media server and live control tool that mixes video and audio assets for broadcast and installation workflows.
Cue-driven show control for synchronized audio and video playback
MA Lighting MediaMaster stands out as a media playback and mixing application built for event and stage workflows in lighting environments. It supports mixing and cue-based control of audio and video assets so productions can run with reliable show sequencing.
The core value comes from integrating media handling with stage-oriented control patterns rather than offering a generic, DAW-like editor. MediaMaster is best used when playback timing, show cues, and operator control matter more than advanced live mixing depth.
- +Stage-oriented cueing helps run consistent audio video playback sequences
- +Media asset mixing supports practical show control without complex routing setups
- +Designed for lighting-centric productions with workflows that match show operators
- –Live audio mixing depth is limited versus dedicated broadcast or DAW tools
- –Advanced routing and mixing customization feels less granular than specialized AV suites
- –Workflow efficiency depends on learning MediaMaster’s specific cue and control model
Best for: Lighting-focused teams needing show-cue audio and video playback control
More related reading
Millumin
live visualsMillumin is a live visual performance software that layers and mixes video while handling audio cues for real-time shows.
Audio-reactive visual parameters combined with real-time scene and layer mixing
Millumin stands out as a real-time visual performance mixer that tightly integrates audio, video, and show control in one operator workflow. It supports time-synced timeline playback, media layering, and scene switching for live mixed output.
Advanced compositing, transitions, and mapping tools help teams drive LED walls and projection systems with consistent visual timing. Audio input and audio-reactive behaviors connect sound dynamics to visual parameters during performances.
- +Real-time layer mixing with precise scene switching for live AV workflows.
- +Tight timeline and sync handling supports repeatable show playback.
- +Strong visual compositing and transitions geared for stage visuals.
- +Audio-reactive controls link sound energy to visual parameters.
- –Onboarding takes time due to pro-level layout and control concepts.
- –Audio mixing depth is lighter than dedicated DAWs for complex mixes.
- –Project complexity grows quickly with large media libraries and mapping.
Best for: Live event teams needing synchronized audio-driven video mixing for stage displays
vMix Virtual Camera
integrationvMix Virtual Camera exposes vMix mixed output as a virtual camera feed so other apps can ingest the mixed audio-video stream.
vMix Virtual Camera that exposes the mixer output as a virtual webcam feed
vMix Virtual Camera stands out for turning vMix output into virtual camera feeds for conferencing and streaming workflows. It provides live production mixing with video and audio sources, real-time effects, and routing to network streams or capture applications. The workflow centers on comprehensive scene control with transitions and audio monitoring, while the virtual camera option enables easy reuse inside video software that accepts camera inputs.
- +Virtual camera output simplifies using vMix productions in conferencing tools
- +Deep mixing controls cover multi-source video and audio in one engine
- +Real-time effects and transitions support polished live switching
- –Complex control surface makes early setup and routing slower to learn
- –Audio monitoring and levels can require careful configuration for stability
- –Virtual camera integration depends on the host app’s capture behavior
Best for: Live production operators mixing many inputs who need a camera-compatible output
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 technology digital media, vMix Virtual Camera stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Audio Video Mixer Software
This guide covers vMix, OBS Studio, Wirecast, XSplit Broadcaster, Resolume Arena, Dataton WATCHOUT, QLab, MA Lighting MediaMaster, Millumin, and vMix Virtual Camera. It focuses on integration depth, data model choices, automation and API surface, and admin and governance controls that affect repeatable live operations. It translates those factors into concrete evaluation steps and common routing mistakes that show up in production setups.
Audio video mixing and show-control software built for real-time routing, effects, and program output
Audio Video Mixer Software composes multiple audio and video inputs into a single program output with scene or cue control, real-time effects, and deterministic switching behavior. It solves the operational problem of turning device inputs like webcams, capture cards, microphones, and media players into a consistent live feed for streaming, recording, or stage distribution. Tools like OBS Studio manage scenes and sources with per-source filters and monitoring, while Wirecast combines scene switching with overlays and an integrated output pipeline for live production.
Evaluation criteria that map to integration depth, automation, and governance
Integration depth determines whether the mixer can feed other systems in the format they already support. vMix Virtual Camera delivers a camera-compatible output, while QLab provides OSC and MIDI triggers for connected control surfaces and external systems.
Data model clarity determines whether operators can scale setups without breaking routing and timing. OBS Studio relies on scene and source organization, while QLab relies on cue lists with groups and macros that encode repeatable show sequences.
Output handoff format that matches downstream systems
vMix Virtual Camera exposes vMix mixed output as a virtual webcam feed, which reduces friction for conferencing apps and browser tools that accept only camera inputs.
Scene and source data model for routing and switching
OBS Studio uses a node-free scene and source mixer with per-source filters, which supports disciplined organization for large live projects. Wirecast uses scene-based multiview and live switching with configurable overlays and transitions, which centralizes operator control for program output.
Per-input audio processing with real-time monitoring
OBS Studio applies audio filters per source with real-time monitoring and extensive mixer controls, which supports stable microphone and capture-card handling during live capture.
External control integration for automation and operator-triggered playback
QLab combines cue lists with OSC and MIDI control to coordinate audio-visual playback and system actions. Resolume Arena supports extensive external control mapping for MIDI, OSC, and controller workflows tied to live visual mixing.
Cue-driven show sequencing for repeatable live operations
QLab uses cue-list show control with live-safe pause, restart, and next-cue behavior that fits stage environments. MA Lighting MediaMaster and Dataton WATCHOUT also center show-cue sequencing so operators can run synchronized media playback reliably.
Distributed synchronization controls for multi-machine video walls
Dataton WATCHOUT provides scalable multi-machine scene playback with frame-accurate synchronization, which fits AV integrators building distributed render nodes and synchronized projection walls.
Decision framework for selecting an AV mixer tool by workflow control and integration requirements
Start from how the mixed output must be consumed by other software or stage systems. If conferencing software needs camera inputs, vMix Virtual Camera provides a virtual webcam output that reuses the same vMix project as the program feed.
Then map the required control abstraction to the tool’s data model. OBS Studio uses scenes and sources with per-source filters, while QLab uses cue lists with groups and macros for timed show logic and external triggering.
Match the output interface to the receiving application
Select vMix Virtual Camera when downstream apps require selectable camera sources instead of network streams. Select Wirecast or XSplit Broadcaster when the studio needs a single integrated output pipeline for recording and live streaming with overlays and transitions.
Choose the core control model based on operator workflow
Use OBS Studio when scene-based layouts and per-source filters are the primary control pattern for live capture and streaming. Use QLab when the operating model is cue lists with live-safe next-cue controls and OSC or MIDI triggers for external actions.
Confirm audio routing depth and monitoring behavior
Use OBS Studio when per-source audio filters with real-time monitoring matter for multiple input devices. Avoid relying on Resolume Arena, MA Lighting MediaMaster, or Millumin for deep DAW-like mixing depth when complex audio mixing requirements are central to the workflow.
Plan automation and extensibility around documented control surfaces
Choose QLab for cue-based automation with OSC and MIDI integration that supports hardware and control surface workflows. Choose Resolume Arena when external control mapping using MIDI, OSC, and controller workflows drives real-time visual parameters tied to audio.
Validate performance impact of effects and source count
Treat vMix as effect-rich but CPU-sensitive when many audio and video effects run during long sessions since higher effect counts increase CPU load. Treat Wirecast and XSplit Broadcaster as source-count sensitive since resource use rises with multiple sources and effects running simultaneously.
Use show-control or distributed synchronization tools for stage scale
Use Dataton WATCHOUT when frame-accurate synchronization across multiple computers and projectors is the primary requirement. Use MA Lighting MediaMaster or QLab when the operational priority is cue-driven playback reliability with externally triggered show actions.
Who each AV mixer style fits best based on real operator use cases
Different products align to different operational roles because their control abstractions differ. vMix targets multi-input live production operators who need a camera-compatible output, while OBS Studio targets streamers and creators needing customizable routing and filters. Stage and installation teams also select based on cue automation and synchronization models, because show control and distributed playback constraints differ from single-machine streaming workflows.
Live production operators mixing many inputs and needing a camera-compatible output
vMix and vMix Virtual Camera fit this role because vMix offers deep mixing controls for multi-source audio and video and vMix Virtual Camera exposes the mixer output as a virtual webcam feed for conferencing and camera-input workflows.
Streamers and creators who need scene control plus per-source audio filtering
OBS Studio fits because it provides scene and source mixing with audio filters per source and real-time monitoring, which supports device setup with encoder control for both streaming and recording.
Live broadcasters and production teams that need overlays, transitions, and multiview switching in one studio
Wirecast and XSplit Broadcaster fit because they center scene-based multiview or scene switching plus integrated audio and video routing, overlays, transitions, and output monitoring for recording and live streaming.
Live VJ and performance operators mixing layered visuals with synchronized timing
Resolume Arena and Millumin fit because they support layer-based composition and instant scene switching with real-time effects tuned for live performance. Millumin also adds audio-reactive visual parameters that connect sound dynamics to visual parameters.
Stage and AV integrator teams that must run cue-based or distributed synchronized media playback
QLab and MA Lighting MediaMaster fit because they use cue-list or cue-driven show control with OSC and MIDI triggering for repeatable performance sequences. Dataton WATCHOUT fits AV integrators because it provides scalable multi-machine scene playback with frame-accurate synchronization.
Operational pitfalls that break routing, timing, and control reliability in AV mixers
Common failures come from mismatching the product’s control model to the operational reality of the event. Another recurring issue is underestimating configuration effort for audio devices and routing before the first live rehearsal. A third problem is building complex effect and scene chains without checking performance headroom for sustained live sessions.
Building a complex audio and effects chain without validating monitoring and stability
Use OBS Studio’s per-source filters with real-time monitoring to verify device gain staging before production. Configure vMix audio monitoring and levels carefully since long sessions with many effects can stress CPU headroom and require tuning.
Relying on the wrong control abstraction for the show workflow
Use QLab cue lists when operations depend on deterministic next-cue controls and external triggers through OSC and MIDI. Avoid forcing a cue-driven stage model onto general scene mixing when Dataton WATCHOUT or MA Lighting MediaMaster is needed for synchronized stage playback behavior.
Creating an unstructured scene or cue organization that breaks under time pressure
OBS Studio projects need disciplined source organization because advanced scene and audio routing can become complex under time pressure. QLab large show projects become harder to navigate without strict organization since cue-list logic depends on groups and macros.
Underestimating performance impact from high source counts and simultaneous effects
Wirecast and XSplit Broadcaster can show increased resource use when many sources and effects run at the same time. vMix can increase CPU load with added audio and video effects, so effects count and preview settings must be managed for long sessions.
Choosing a single-machine mixer when multi-machine synchronization is required
Select Dataton WATCHOUT for frame-accurate synchronization and scalable multi-computer scene playback. Use WATCHOUT when video wall blending and edge overlap control across distributed render nodes is part of the requirement.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated vMix, OBS Studio, Wirecast, XSplit Broadcaster, Resolume Arena, Dataton WATCHOUT, QLab, MA Lighting MediaMaster, Millumin, and vMix Virtual Camera using the provided feature coverage, ease of use, and value signals. Features carry the most weight in the overall rating, with ease of use and value each playing a smaller role in the final score.
This ranking reflects criteria-based editorial scoring derived from the listed capabilities, strengths, and limitations across the tools. vMix stands out because vMix Virtual Camera turns mixer output into a virtual webcam feed, and that concrete integration mechanism directly lifts the features and value factors for operators who must hand off a camera-compatible program feed.
Frequently Asked Questions About Audio Video Mixer Software
Which audio video mixer tools can output a camera feed for conferencing apps?
How do vMix, OBS Studio, and Wirecast differ in scene switching and routing control?
What is the practical difference between cue-based show control and mixer-style live production?
Which tools support external automation using OSC or MIDI, and where does this fit?
What integration or API options exist for connecting mixer workflows to external systems?
How do these tools handle distributed video wall synchronization across multiple machines?
What security controls and identity options matter when multiple operators share the same system?
How should data migration be handled when moving from a DAW project or prior show setup?
Which tool suits audio-reactive visuals for live stage outputs?
What are common performance bottlenecks and how do the tools mitigate them?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Technology Digital Media alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of technology digital media tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare technology digital media tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.