GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Manufacturing EngineeringTop 8 Best Arc Flash Software of 2026
Discover top-rated arc flash software solutions to enhance safety. Compare features, find the best fit for your needs – start your search today.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
SKM Power*Tools
Arc Flash computations generated directly from SKM one-line power system models
Built for utilities and engineering firms modeling distribution networks for arc flash compliance.
ETAP
Arc Flash hazard calculations driven by ETAP network and protective device time-current behavior
Built for engineering teams performing arc flash studies with protection coordination.
EasyPower
Arc flash label and report generation from single-line study inputs
Built for electrical teams needing consistent arc flash studies from structured single-line data.
Related reading
Comparison Table
This comparison table ranks arc flash software options used for incident energy calculations and protective device coordination, including SKM Power*Tools, ETAP, EasyPower, UtilityAPI Arc Flash, and SES Arc Flash. Each row summarizes key capabilities so readers can compare modeling workflows, analysis outputs, and integration needs across toolsets used for electrical safety studies.
| # | Tool | Category | Overall | Features | Ease of Use | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SKM Power*Tools Provides arc-flash and protective-device coordination studies by modeling electrical systems and generating incident energy and protective device settings reports. | engineering suite | 8.5/10 | 8.9/10 | 8.0/10 | 8.4/10 |
| 2 | ETAP Performs short-circuit and protective device studies and generates arc-flash hazard results from electrical system models. | power engineering | 8.1/10 | 8.6/10 | 7.8/10 | 7.7/10 |
| 3 | EasyPower Computes short-circuit, protective device coordination, and arc-flash hazard analysis for modeled electrical one-line diagrams. | arc flash analysis | 7.6/10 | 8.0/10 | 7.2/10 | 7.6/10 |
| 4 | UtilityAPI Arc Flash Automates arc-flash data processing and electrical safety calculations for equipment lists using API-driven inputs and outputs. | API-first | 7.8/10 | 8.1/10 | 7.2/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 5 | SES Arc Flash Calculates arc-flash incident energy and hazard category results for electrical equipment based on service conditions and protective device settings. | incident energy | 7.4/10 | 7.5/10 | 7.0/10 | 7.6/10 |
| 6 | eTAP Arc Flash Delivers arc-flash study workflows as part of a larger electrical design and analysis environment for industrial power systems. | suite workflow | 7.6/10 | 7.8/10 | 7.2/10 | 7.6/10 |
| 7 | Mosaic Engineering Arc Flash Generates arc-flash hazard assessments by combining electrical model parameters with protective device behavior for actionable safety labeling. | hazard labeling | 7.2/10 | 7.6/10 | 6.9/10 | 7.0/10 |
| 8 | Arc Flash Pro Provides calculation tools for arc-flash incident energy and protective device coordination guidance tied to electrical equipment parameters. | calculation tool | 7.2/10 | 7.5/10 | 6.8/10 | 7.2/10 |
Provides arc-flash and protective-device coordination studies by modeling electrical systems and generating incident energy and protective device settings reports.
Performs short-circuit and protective device studies and generates arc-flash hazard results from electrical system models.
Computes short-circuit, protective device coordination, and arc-flash hazard analysis for modeled electrical one-line diagrams.
Automates arc-flash data processing and electrical safety calculations for equipment lists using API-driven inputs and outputs.
Calculates arc-flash incident energy and hazard category results for electrical equipment based on service conditions and protective device settings.
Delivers arc-flash study workflows as part of a larger electrical design and analysis environment for industrial power systems.
Generates arc-flash hazard assessments by combining electrical model parameters with protective device behavior for actionable safety labeling.
Provides calculation tools for arc-flash incident energy and protective device coordination guidance tied to electrical equipment parameters.
SKM Power*Tools
engineering suiteProvides arc-flash and protective-device coordination studies by modeling electrical systems and generating incident energy and protective device settings reports.
Arc Flash computations generated directly from SKM one-line power system models
SKM Power*Tools stands out with deep electrical distribution modeling and arc flash calculation workflows driven by SKM’s power system database. Core capabilities include arc flash assessment using industry methods, protective device coordination inputs, and result reporting tied to modeled equipment. The tool supports design iteration by updating one-line data and regenerating arc flash results across the same electrical network.
Pros
- Strong integration between one-line modeling and arc flash calculations
- Supports protective device and coordination data feeding arc flash results
- Produces detailed reports mapped to modeled electrical equipment
Cons
- Setup requires accurate electrical model inputs for trustworthy results
- Interface and workflow can feel complex for small or simple studies
- Arc flash outcomes depend heavily on correct protective device settings
Best For
Utilities and engineering firms modeling distribution networks for arc flash compliance
More related reading
ETAP
power engineeringPerforms short-circuit and protective device studies and generates arc-flash hazard results from electrical system models.
Arc Flash hazard calculations driven by ETAP network and protective device time-current behavior
ETAP stands out for combining arc flash studies with broader electrical power system modeling and protection coordination workflows. The Arc Flash module supports IEC and IEEE style calculations using electrical model inputs, protective device clearing times, and fault current contributions. It also generates documentation outputs for labeling and reporting that align with common industrial arc flash documentation practices. ETAP’s strength is keeping arc flash results connected to the same network model used for reliability and protection analysis.
Pros
- Arc flash results stay tied to the same power system model used for protection studies
- Supports both IEEE and IEC arc flash calculation conventions and exposure options
- Produces exportable reports and label-ready outputs for field documentation
Cons
- Modeling accuracy depends on detailed device and coordination data quality
- Study setup can be heavy for users who only need standalone arc flash outputs
- Iterating design changes requires repeated fault and clearing time recalculations
Best For
Engineering teams performing arc flash studies with protection coordination
EasyPower
arc flash analysisComputes short-circuit, protective device coordination, and arc-flash hazard analysis for modeled electrical one-line diagrams.
Arc flash label and report generation from single-line study inputs
EasyPower from electricalsolutions.com stands out with a dedicated arc flash workflow tied to electrical single-line inputs. The tool supports arc flash calculations and labeling outputs for typical equipment configurations. It focuses on producing documentation deliverables that align with established arc flash methodologies. It is positioned for teams that want repeatable calculations tied to their asset data rather than broad simulation across multiple study types.
Pros
- Arc flash calculation workflow is focused on producing usable labeling and reports
- Single-line based input supports repeatable studies across similar equipment
- Deliverables align with common compliance documentation expectations
Cons
- Scope is primarily arc flash oriented rather than a multi-discipline power study suite
- Workflow can require careful data setup to avoid rework during iterations
- Limited evidence of advanced what-if automation for rapid redesign comparisons
Best For
Electrical teams needing consistent arc flash studies from structured single-line data
More related reading
UtilityAPI Arc Flash
API-firstAutomates arc-flash data processing and electrical safety calculations for equipment lists using API-driven inputs and outputs.
Arc Flash study result generation that supports consistent labeling deliverables
UtilityAPI Arc Flash stands out by focusing on software delivery for Arc Flash studies rather than general electrical engineering document management. It supports workflow for generating and updating Arc Flash labeling results tied to electrical assets. Core capabilities center on modeling inputs, producing protection and risk outcomes, and turning those calculations into usable deliverables for field labeling and documentation. The product is best evaluated for study production speed and consistency across project updates.
Pros
- Arc Flash study production focused on calculation inputs and labeling outputs
- Workflow supports updating results as study assumptions change
- Delivers structured outputs that reduce manual transcription errors
Cons
- Setup depends on correct electrical data formatting and completeness
- Limited evidence of advanced visualization beyond study output generation
- Less suited for teams needing full end-to-end engineering document suites
Best For
Facilities and engineering teams producing Arc Flash labels from standardized studies
SES Arc Flash
incident energyCalculates arc-flash incident energy and hazard category results for electrical equipment based on service conditions and protective device settings.
Incident energy and arc-flash boundary calculation tied to protective device coordination inputs
SES Arc Flash distinguishes itself with a workflow focused on arc-flash study production and documentation for electrical assets. It supports configuring protective device and system parameters to calculate incident energy and arc-flash boundaries using established engineering inputs. The software emphasizes generating study outputs and maintaining calculation traceability across revisions for project handover.
Pros
- Arc-flash calculations connect protection settings and incident energy outputs
- Study generation supports consistent documentation across multiple equipment levels
- Revision-friendly workflow helps keep engineering inputs traceable
Cons
- Input setup can be time-consuming for large one-line models
- Advanced customization needs stronger engineering discipline during data entry
- Visualization and reporting options feel less flexible than broader design suites
Best For
Electrical engineering teams producing repeatable arc-flash studies for power distribution
More related reading
eTAP Arc Flash
suite workflowDelivers arc-flash study workflows as part of a larger electrical design and analysis environment for industrial power systems.
ETAP-based incident energy and arc-flash boundary reporting linked to one-line equipment
eTAP Arc Flash stands out by integrating arc-flash calculations directly with ETAP electrical design workflows. It supports protective device coordination based arc-flash assessment and produces results tied to study cases and equipment models. Core outputs include incident energy and arc flash boundary determination using configurable modeling assumptions. Reporting and export options support review of one-line and affected device scenarios for coordination studies.
Pros
- Tight ETAP model integration keeps arc-flash results aligned with network studies
- Supports protective device coordination inputs used for incident energy calculations
- Produces incident energy and arc flash boundary outputs per studied equipment
Cons
- Requires ETAP study setup discipline to avoid mismatched assumptions
- Workflow can feel heavy for teams using only arc-flash analysis
- Modeling and calculation parameter choices need careful review to prevent errors
Best For
Electrical engineering teams using ETAP for coordination and arc-flash studies
Mosaic Engineering Arc Flash
hazard labelingGenerates arc-flash hazard assessments by combining electrical model parameters with protective device behavior for actionable safety labeling.
Arc-flash study generation that produces report-ready documentation from modeled equipment inputs
Mosaic Engineering Arc Flash stands out with an engineering-first approach that centers on arc-flash study production and report-ready outputs. The workflow typically supports conductor and protective device inputs, standard calculations tied to industry arc-flash methods, and generation of documentation suitable for labeling and compliance use. It also focuses on turning analysis results into actionable switchgear and equipment level findings rather than only presenting theoretical risk curves.
Pros
- Engineering-focused arc-flash calculations aligned to protective device assumptions
- Outputs support report generation for labeling and study documentation
- Encourages consistent input capture across equipment and protective device sets
Cons
- Workflow can feel rigid for teams without established study conventions
- Input modeling effort remains significant for complex one-line coverage
- Limited visibility into what-if scenarios without rebuilding study inputs
Best For
Electrical engineering teams producing arc-flash studies and labeling documentation
More related reading
Arc Flash Pro
calculation toolProvides calculation tools for arc-flash incident energy and protective device coordination guidance tied to electrical equipment parameters.
Incident energy and arc-flash results generation tied to protective device coordination
Arc Flash Pro distinguishes itself by focusing specifically on arc-flash hazard studies and producing deliverables tied to electrical safety requirements. It provides workflow-driven calculation support for selecting protective device coordination and determining incident energy results. The tool also emphasizes reporting outputs that can be reused across equipment and projects. Overall, it is designed to turn arc-flash data into actionable safety documentation.
Pros
- Arc-flash study workflow supports incident energy and protective device decision making.
- Reporting outputs help package safety documentation for electrical systems.
- Project-based reuse of study inputs reduces repetition across similar assets.
Cons
- Setup of electrical parameters and study assumptions can be time-consuming.
- Usability depends heavily on accurate data collection and input formatting.
- Limited insight into model transparency compared with more advanced engineering platforms.
Best For
Electrical safety teams needing repeatable arc-flash studies with structured reporting
Conclusion
After evaluating 8 manufacturing engineering, SKM Power*Tools stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Arc Flash Software
This buyer’s guide covers how to choose arc flash software solutions across SKM Power*Tools, ETAP, EasyPower, UtilityAPI Arc Flash, SES Arc Flash, eTAP Arc Flash, Mosaic Engineering Arc Flash, and Arc Flash Pro. It focuses on calculation workflow fit, model integration depth, and the ability to produce incident energy, arc flash boundaries, and label-ready outputs. It also highlights common setup pitfalls that affect reliability of protective device settings and incident energy results.
What Is Arc Flash Software?
Arc Flash software calculates incident energy and arc flash hazard boundaries for electrical equipment so exposure labeling can be completed with engineering traceability. The tools also tie results to protective device behavior and clearing times so coordination assumptions drive the final hazard category outputs. Typical users include electrical engineering teams and utilities managing medium-voltage and low-voltage distribution studies with one-line models. Tools like SKM Power*Tools generate arc flash computations directly from SKM one-line power system models, while ETAP ties arc flash hazard calculations to ETAP network and protective device time-current behavior.
Key Features to Look For
The right feature set determines whether arc flash results stay consistent across revisions and whether outputs are usable for labeling and field documentation.
One-line model driven arc flash computations
SKM Power*Tools produces arc flash computations directly from SKM one-line power system models so results map to the modeled electrical equipment. ETAP and eTAP Arc Flash also keep arc flash results tied to the same network model used for protection and coordination workflows.
Protective device coordination and time-current behavior inputs
ETAP and eTAP Arc Flash calculate incident energy and arc flash boundary outputs using protective device time-current behavior and clearing time contributions. SES Arc Flash similarly ties incident energy and arc-flash boundary calculations directly to protective device coordination inputs so protective settings become traceable drivers of hazard results.
IEEE and IEC calculation conventions support
ETAP supports IEC and IEEE style calculations and exposure options so the software can align with the calculation conventions used by the organization. EasyPower focuses on structured arc flash workflows tied to single-line inputs that produce deliverables aligned with common compliance documentation expectations.
Label-ready and report-ready documentation outputs
EasyPower generates arc flash label and report outputs from single-line study inputs for consistent documentation deliverables. UtilityAPI Arc Flash emphasizes structured outputs that reduce manual transcription errors for labeling and documentation workflows.
Revision-friendly traceability from inputs to results
SES Arc Flash emphasizes maintaining calculation traceability across revisions so engineering inputs remain traceable during project handover. SKM Power*Tools supports design iteration by updating one-line data and regenerating arc flash results across the same electrical network so repeated studies stay tied to the same modeled system.
Automation for consistent study production from standardized data
UtilityAPI Arc Flash uses API-driven inputs and outputs to generate and update arc flash labeling results tied to electrical assets. Arc Flash Pro and Mosaic Engineering Arc Flash focus on repeatable arc flash studies that turn incident energy outputs into actionable safety documentation suitable for equipment-level findings.
How to Choose the Right Arc Flash Software
Selection should start with the modeling scope and workflow end point, then confirm whether protective device coordination and label outputs match the engineering and field documentation process.
Match the tool to the modeling scope and workflow entry point
For distribution-network studies where electrical modeling must drive arc flash results, SKM Power*Tools fits because it generates arc flash computations directly from SKM one-line power system models. For teams that already run broader electrical power system and protection workflows in ETAP, ETAP and eTAP Arc Flash keep arc flash hazard calculations connected to the same network model and protective device time-current behavior.
Confirm protective device coordination is a first-class calculation driver
ETAP and eTAP Arc Flash use protective device clearing times and fault current contributions to generate incident energy and arc flash boundary outputs. SES Arc Flash is a strong fit when protective device coordination inputs must be directly tied to incident energy and arc-flash boundary calculations for repeatable studies.
Plan for documentation and labeling deliverables, not just hazard numbers
If the primary output is label-ready documentation for field use, EasyPower and UtilityAPI Arc Flash focus on generating labeling and report deliverables from single-line or standardized asset data. Arc Flash Pro also packages incident energy and arc flash results into reusable safety documentation outputs for equipment-level decision making.
Evaluate how study iteration works when electrical assumptions change
SKM Power*Tools supports updating one-line data and regenerating arc flash results across the same electrical network to support design iteration. ETAP can require repeated fault and clearing recalculations when design changes occur, so teams needing frequent changes should confirm the workflow discipline they will apply in ETAP and eTAP Arc Flash.
Validate input data readiness and workflow complexity for the team
When electrical model inputs are complete and accurate, SKM Power*Tools delivers detailed reports mapped to modeled electrical equipment, but accurate protective device settings are essential for trustworthy results. When the workflow needs to be focused and structured for repeatability, EasyPower can reduce scope by focusing on arc flash calculation workflows and label outputs driven by single-line study inputs.
Who Needs Arc Flash Software?
Arc flash software benefits organizations that must calculate incident energy and arc flash boundaries with protective coordination traceability and produce consistent documentation for labeling.
Utilities and engineering firms modeling distribution networks for arc flash compliance
SKM Power*Tools is built for distribution-network modeling because it generates arc flash computations directly from SKM one-line power system models and produces reports mapped to modeled electrical equipment. ETAP also fits utility-style protection workflows because arc flash hazard calculations are driven by the ETAP network and protective device time-current behavior.
Engineering teams performing arc flash studies with protection coordination in an integrated environment
ETAP is the best fit when arc flash results must stay tied to the same power system model used for protection studies and coordination. eTAP Arc Flash suits teams that already structure their electrical design and analysis inside ETAP and need incident energy and arc flash boundary outputs linked to one-line equipment.
Electrical teams needing consistent arc flash studies from structured single-line data
EasyPower is designed for structured single-line inputs and produces arc flash label and report generation from those study inputs. Mosaic Engineering Arc Flash targets report-ready documentation and actionable switchgear and equipment-level findings, which supports consistent study conventions when inputs are standardized.
Facilities teams producing arc flash labels from standardized studies and repeatable data pipelines
UtilityAPI Arc Flash supports API-driven workflows to generate and update arc flash labeling results tied to electrical assets. This focus on consistent labeling deliverables makes it suitable for teams that value structured outputs that reduce manual transcription errors.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Most failures in arc flash programs come from missing or inconsistent input discipline that then propagates into incident energy and hazard boundary outputs.
Using incomplete electrical model data and expecting reliable incident energy
SKM Power*Tools produces detailed results from modeled electrical equipment, but setup requires accurate electrical model inputs for trustworthy calculations. ETAP and eTAP Arc Flash also depend on detailed device and coordination data quality because arc flash results rely on clearing times and time-current behavior.
Treating protective device settings as an afterthought instead of a calculation input
SKM Power*Tools explicitly ties results to correct protective device settings because arc flash outcomes depend heavily on those inputs. SES Arc Flash and Arc Flash Pro both center incident energy and hazard results on protective device coordination, so incorrect coordination inputs will directly distort outputs.
Over-scoping when a focused arc flash workflow is the real requirement
EasyPower narrows scope to arc flash calculation workflows tied to single-line inputs so teams avoid heavy study setup beyond their needs. UtilityAPI Arc Flash also stays focused on generating arc flash labeling outputs from standardized asset data, which reduces the operational overhead of broader power studies.
Expecting instant iteration without recalculation effort for network and clearing changes
ETAP and eTAP Arc Flash can require repeated fault and clearing time recalculations when design changes occur, which affects iteration speed. SKM Power*Tools supports regeneration from updated one-line data, but it still depends on updated protective coordination assumptions and correct input discipline.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated every tool using three sub-dimensions with fixed weights: features at 0.4, ease of use at 0.3, and value at 0.3. The overall rating is the weighted average computed as overall = 0.40 × features + 0.30 × ease of use + 0.30 × value. SKM Power*Tools separated from lower-ranked tools because its features included arc flash computations generated directly from SKM one-line power system models, which strongly connects modeled electrical equipment to incident energy and protective device settings outputs. ETAP and eTAP Arc Flash also scored well on features because arc flash hazard calculations are driven by ETAP network and protective device time-current behavior, but the workflow still requires disciplined model setup to prevent mismatched assumptions.
Frequently Asked Questions About Arc Flash Software
Which arc flash software tool generates incident energy results directly from a modeled one-line network?
SKM Power*Tools generates arc flash computations directly from SKM one-line power system models, so changes to the electrical one-line propagate into updated hazard results. ETAP also keeps arc flash tied to the same network model, linking incident energy calculations to the protection and reliability study context.
What tool best supports arc flash work that starts with protective device time-current behavior and coordination studies?
ETAP supports arc flash studies driven by protective device clearing times and fault current contributions, which keeps hazard results aligned with protection coordination outcomes. eTAP Arc Flash integrates arc-flash assessment into ETAP electrical design workflows and produces incident energy and arc flash boundary reporting tied to study cases and equipment models.
Which option is best for producing arc flash labels and documentation directly from structured single-line inputs?
EasyPower focuses on a dedicated arc flash workflow tied to electrical single-line inputs and outputs label and report deliverables for typical equipment configurations. UtilityAPI Arc Flash centers on generating and updating Arc Flash labeling results tied to electrical assets, emphasizing consistent study result production for field labeling.
Which tools emphasize study production speed and consistency across project updates?
UtilityAPI Arc Flash targets study result generation workflow for producing consistent labeling deliverables when electrical assets or inputs change. SES Arc Flash emphasizes repeatable incident energy and arc-flash boundary calculations and maintains calculation traceability across revisions for project handover.
Which software is suited for incident energy calculations that must maintain calculation traceability for revisions and handover?
SES Arc Flash maintains calculation traceability across revisions while producing study outputs for incident energy and arc-flash boundaries tied to protective device coordination inputs. Mosaic Engineering Arc Flash also targets report-ready outputs from modeled equipment inputs and supports producing documentation suitable for labeling and compliance use.
Which tool integrates arc flash hazard outputs into a broader protection coordination and electrical design workflow?
eTAP Arc Flash integrates arc-flash calculations directly with ETAP electrical design workflows and supports protective device coordination based arc-flash assessment using configurable modeling assumptions. ETAP also combines arc flash module capabilities with power system modeling and protection coordination workflows so hazard outputs remain connected to the same network model.
Which software is best when the primary deliverable is report-ready documentation for compliance and switchgear-level findings?
Mosaic Engineering Arc Flash produces report-ready documentation from modeled equipment inputs and focuses on actionable switchgear and equipment-level findings rather than only theoretical risk curves. Arc Flash Pro is designed to turn incident energy data into actionable safety documentation using workflow-driven calculation support and reusable reporting outputs.
What arc flash workflow is most appropriate for utilities or engineering teams building and iterating on distribution network models?
SKM Power*Tools is a strong fit for utilities and engineering firms because it supports design iteration by updating one-line data and regenerating arc flash results across the same electrical network. ETAP is also suitable for teams performing arc flash studies with broader protection coordination workflows tied to the electrical model.
What is a common output to look for when evaluating arc flash software for field use and labeling readiness?
EasyPower is built around generating arc flash label and report deliverables from single-line study inputs, which supports field labeling workflows. UtilityAPI Arc Flash and SES Arc Flash both focus on turning study computations into usable deliverables that can be reused across equipment and revisions.
Tools reviewed
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Manufacturing Engineering alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of manufacturing engineering tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare manufacturing engineering tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.